Despite steady advances in marketing execution and measurement technologies, B2B marketing leaders still struggle to measure marketing’s impact on the business. In this webinar, SiriusDecisions Research Director Ross Graber & Allocadia CMO James Thomas look at the current state of B2B marketing measurement and share guidance on how successful organizations align their business objectives with measurable marketing impact.
Join us to hear SiriusDecisions' research-based recommendations for how to:
- Establish a meaningful view of marketing’s contribution to revenue
- Develop measurement priorities, and align those priorities with marketing investments
- Structure a system of measurement that effectively demonstrates results.
The ROI Dilemma: Aligning Marketing Priorities with Measurable Performance
1. The ROI Dilemma: Aligning Marketing
Priorities with Measurable Results
Featured Analyst:
The
ROI
Dilemma
2. Ross Graber
Services Director, Marketing
Operations Strategies
@RossGraber
James Thomas
CMO
@jthomas_44
Presenters
3. Agenda
Housekeeping
• Questions? Use the Chat Panel
or on Twitter
• Technical Difficulties? Contact
brittany.wong@allocadia.com
• The ROI Dilemma: marketing
measurement challenges and trends
• How to leverage effective planning
processes to drive effective
measurement using the SiriusDecisions
Campaign Framework
• How to deploy strategic planning
processes with investments, measurement
and performance using Allocadia
#SDWebinar
4. Ross Graber
Service Director, Marketing Operations Strategies
@RossGraber #sdwebinar
37. Key Takeaways
• A better way of measurement starts with
better planning
• Drive towards a sense of impact. Set
marketing’s goal and develop expectations
for performance
• Define how marketing will contribute and
what they will drive for the business
38. Questions
Please your questions in the Chat
panel.
To see a demo of Allocadia, go to:
learn.allocadia.com/demo
39. Thank you.
• Receive a copy of this presentation
• Get a personalized demo of Allocadia
learn.allocadia.com/demo
James Thomas
CMO | Allocadia
james.thomas@allocadia.com
@Jthomas_44
@allocadia
Ross Graber
Services Director, Marketing
Operations Strategies
Ross.graber@siriusdecisions.com
@RossGraber
@siriusdecisions
Editor's Notes
I’m here today to talk about the dilemma marketers find themselves in when it comes to showing return on marketing investment. At the heart of dilemma is the fact that marketing leaders almost universally agree upon the importance of showing marketing ROI, but very few marketing organizations even claim to be able to do it – muchless understand how to go about creating a view of marketing ROI. That is in essence the definition of a dilemma – we know we need to do it, we’re being asked to do it, we can’t do it today and we’re not sure what it’s going to look like or how we’re going to get there.
Which takes us to what I’m going to cover today.
We’ve been talking to marketing leaders and here’s what they’re telling us. There are a lot of things that have gotten a lot better. [fill in]
But there are still some bit challenges…
Most businesses are looking for a single marketing ROI metric and not having success.
Connections are not being made between marketing’s actions and business impact.
And evaluating the effectiveness of activities not intended to directly create demand is still difficult.
[Many things may be better, but the core problem hasn’t been solved]
--
The highest driver of change cited by CMOs (31 percent) was the need to show ROI
Fewer than 20 percent of b-to-b organizations are comfortable with their ability to quantify the returns on marketing spend
Let’s take a look at why this is happening.
The thing most businesses struggle with is that that ask the question “what is marketing contributing” before they answer key questions about how marketing should be contributing. Marketing’s job changes based on the company’s go to market focus. When marketing focuses on large accounts…. And that’s much different than when marketing focuses on smaller accounts….
[different expectations deliver different results and need different ways to measure the return]
Which tells us how important it is to set goals for marketing and marketing reporting. At SiriusDections, we’ve researched the process orgs go through for developing measurement - and it is very much as process. The first of 3 phases of reporting development is the goal setting phase. While we see a lot of organizations jump directly to execution because they feel it will yield faster results, that’s rarely the answer. Time spend aligning reporting goals with the organization’s expections for how marketing is going to contribute to acheiveing business goals is time well spent.
[use the process to set expectations, otherwise you’re guessing]
When set our goals for measurement, it’s important that we have a strong handle on the types of measurements that are available to us. We’ve developed a Metrics Spectrum that defines this for marketers. The most basic element of what we measure is activity – what we did. This is not ROI.
Then there;s output. With all the technological advances in marketing systems, we have more of this than ever. But doesn’t show us business impact. And without a strategy, you’ll never be able to make the connection between outputs and business results.
Which takes us to Impact metrics – these are the ultimate results that the business cares about. Revenue, market share, profitability. When systems of measurement work, they’re able to tie a series of actions and their outputs to the business results that they are intended to contribute. [NEXT SLIDE]
[vocabulary helps make the distinctions between what be do and the results we need – but without objectives, we can’t get to results]
And then there’s tactic attribution….
For those not familiar, tactic attribution is a technique which looks to apportion revenue value to each marketing tactic execute. And tactic attribution tends to work completely outside of the goals setting process. Let me describe it…
Here’s the basic premise behind how tactic attribution models work. - They look to associate individual marketing tactics with the revenue they are considered to have produced. The revenue produced is calculated by making a claim against the won opportunity value of opportunities associated with that tactic. So if a buyer downloads a white paper and later signs a $100K deal with me, that white paper get’s credited $100k (or some share of it). The won revenue amount is divided by the cost of the tactic, let’s say $25K in this example to arrive at a Tactic ROI. Let’s move on an dig into some of the variations we see and their implications.
First is single touch.
….. This isn’t the answer. We can’t start with the tactics if we want to show marketing impact.
H
A better way starts with better planning. I like to use our campaign measurement framework as the example. Campaign, defined buyer need and audience. Builds from the top down, starting with objectives then breaking out into performance areas – reputation, DC, SE , MI – the things that marketing does. These need objectives too. Then tactics need to be constructed to achieve those program objectives – they’re mid-term indicators of progress – most sales cycles are long and we can’t wait until the end to measure.
Then we can understand tactics relative to their own performance. Did they do what they needed to do.
- Work top down!
Now let’s be specific – this is what goals can look like….
Review goals, then discuss tactic performance and comparisons. Knowing the activities and outputs.
Looks great – How do I do that
Most marketers I share this with can immediately relate. They know what they’re being asked to do and know it’s more involved than just assigning revenue to stand-alone tactics. But why do they still struggle.
- For one thing, they lack the process to set goals and align them with a planning approach.
- Sales marketing and product alignment is difficult work and it’s difficult to chart a course for marketing and develop organizational buy in
- And organizations with the desire to plan this way find them lacking the tools to support showing results against their objectives and attain the visibility required to manage the process
It may be hard work, but there is a path to take. Next I’m going to focus on planning so we can develop what types of returns are expected of marketing.
And I find that it begins with developing the strategies for how a business is going to develop revenue. It comes from one of four places…
The next step is to be specific about how our segmented approaches are going to produce revenue – how we’re going to measure success. Because we may choose different marketing approaches based on what our objectives are. Let’s start by focussing on where our revenue is going to come from . It helps us drive what we need to do.
Then let’s break that down one step further. And this is a worksheet we’ve developed for defining that next level of program objectives. We call it the obstacles and opportunities worksheet. It’s meant to force us to be specific about what our efforts are going to accomplish. [ Give examples] rank them] use this as a guide to develop metrics, narrow the list of what you’re going to measure and think about your allocation of resources.
The solution to the ROI dilemma is to reshape the problem – and then own it. Marketing leaders need to define how marketing is going to contribute – and it’s not just leads – and be upfront about these being the things that marketing will drive. Define what marketing will deliver.
There’s not one thing that will be delivered, so use the roadmap for measurement to sort out what marketing will do and then produce the collection of metrics that tell a more complete story.
Getting this right is about producing connections between the things we do and the impacts they’re supposed to create. Drawing those linkages allow use to tie immediate results to mid term and long term results.
And then put your money where it counts. Use a purposeful planning process to match your resources with the organization’s specific objectives and religiously track your acheivement against them. The reason that we care about ROI is that we need to show how marketing is delivering – and with a purposefully driven approach to measurement, more b-to-b organizations can confidently show the value marketing creates.
To set marketing’s goals for performance reporting, you need to first align the marketing organization as a whole.
Most marketing orgs today are silo-ed, and it doesn’t have to be that way.
Allocadia is designed to manage your global and regional investments, so all your marketing spend and results becomes aligned across teams, BUs, channels, agency vendors, etc.
It is a starting place for marketing organizations to set a foundation to align business priorities with marketing performance.
Ultimately, as Ross mentioned, leadership can set the stage to drive towards making a sense of “Impact” , so we can answer critical business questions like:
How can we understand Marketing’s Impact against business goals and performance?
Let me show you how we can do that with Allocadia.
--- how to ---
In Allocadia, you can create a marketing hierarchy that makes sense to your organization from an investment and results view.
This is a typical example of a global B2B organization: Field Marketing split out by region (or product line, business unit, channel/MDF and agency vendor spend)
[Build 1 – Folder highlights]
As you can see here, managing your marketing org hierarchy is as simple as thinking of this as folders and subfolders.
[Build 2 – User Share Permissions]
Aligning your teams, you can also set the appropriate share permissions and access rights to different marketers. [speak to example]
[Build 3 – Multi-currency]
With global organizations, you often need to use multi-currencies. We can manage multi-currencies and roll-up into a master currency.
In order to report on performance, you need visibility across your organization in two critical areas:
[Build 4 – Investment/Returns Hierarchy]
First, your investments. You need to understand how and where you’re investing. This is where you manage all your global investment planning and spend.
Second, your results. How you can tie your investments to your results and performance. This is where you manage your program lead targets and results.
WHAT YOU GET: Create alignment and gain full visibility across your marketing organization
From a very rudimentary basis, as marketers, we’re given a budget from finance and we need to show how we’re spending against it AND share what results we’re driving for our businesses.
And we can do that by aligning our TOP-DOWN target / budget allocations with our BOTTOMS-UP marketing plans.
Here’s how we can do that:
[Build 4 – Top-down Budget Allocation for North America]
Let’s look at the North America budget as an example. This “arrow” is where finance can input the budget allocation for North America by quarter. They would do the same for each budget.
Now that the budget is established, the North American marketing team needs to align their marketing plans to their target budget. Let’s go into the North America plan and budget.
[Builds – there’s a lot]
I think you can speak to this slide well
Special notes:
Details Panel – Objectives. “Taking the SiriusDecisions Objectives that Ross mentioned, we’re able to align the Objective with our programs.
Details Panel – Program Family. “Further, we can align the SiriusDecisions Program Families with the programs as well.
It becomes really easy for field teams to align PROGRAM SPEND to BUSINESS PRIORITIES.
WHAT YOU GET: Your strategic plans, investments and budgets, all in one place.
Because all of the budgets globally are brought together in one place, these become the critical strategic data points that your organization can now segment by.
Let me know show you what I mean in the analytics.