PULMONARY EMBOLISM
THE GREAT MASQUERADER
INTRODUCTION
• One of “the big three” cardiovascular killers.
• Case fatality rate about 15%.
• Survivors with impaired quality of life.
• Common problem yet difficult to diagnose.
• No diagnostic test in utility unless PE is kept in D/D.
• Prevention is much easier than diagnosis and treatment.
CLASSIFICATION
 Clinical classification
 MASSIVE PE
 SUB MASSIVE PE
 SMALL TO MODERATE PE
CLASSIFICATION
 Temporal classification
 Acute
 Subacute
 Chronic
 Anatomical
 Saddle
 Lobar
 Segmental
 Subsegmental
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
• Modifiable risk factors:
• Obesity
• Metabolic syndrome
• Cigarette smoking
• Hypertension
• Abnormal lipid profile
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
• Not readily modifiable risk factors
• Advancing age
• Arterial disease
• Personal or family history
• Recent surgery, trauma or immobility
• CCF
• COPD
• Air pollution
• Long haul air travel
• Pregnancy, OC pills
• Cardiac devices
• Hypercoagulable states
• Factor V Leiden
• Prothrombin gene mutation
• Antithrombin deficiency
• Protein C deficiency
• Protein S deficiency
• Antiphospholipid anti body syndrome
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
 Relationship between DVT and PE :
 Thrombus forms in vein
 Via venacava to RA and RV
 Pulmonary arterial circulation
 Large embolus may lodge at bifurcation of pulmonary artery forming
saddle embolus.
 More commonly major pulmonary vessel is occluded.
 Usually in patients with PE, no doppler evidence of DVT.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
• Pulmonary Infarction, atelectasis
• Increased pulmonary vascular resistance caused by vascular
obstruction, neurohormonal changes or baroreceptors
• Impaired gas exchange
• Alveolar hyperventilation due to reflex stimulation of irritant
receptors
• RV dysfunction and failure
• Myocardial ischemia and circulatory failure
CLINICAL FEATURES
 S/S nonspecific.
 Clinical suspicion is of paramount importance.
 SYMPTOMS
 Otherwise unexplained dyspnea
 Chest pain either pleuritic or atypical
 Anxiety
 Cough
CLINICAL FEATURES
 SIGNS
 Tachypnea
 Tachycardia
 Low grade fever
 Left parasternal lift
 TR murmur
 Loud P2
 Leg edema, erythema, tenderness
Pretest probability assessment
CLASSIC WELLS CRITERIA
SCORE POINTS
DVT symptoms or signs 3
An alternative diagnosis is less likely
than PE
3
Heart rate >100/min 1.5
Immobilization or surgery within 4
weeks
1.5
Prior DVT or PE 1.5
Hemoptysis 1
Cancer treated within 6 months or
metastatic
1
INVESTIGATIONS
 NONIMAGING METHODS
 CBC, RFT, BNP, Troponin
 Plasma D-dimer assay
 Highly sensitive but not specific.
 Other causes of elevations should be ruled out.
 ABG analysis
 Electrocardiogram
 Normal
 Sinus tachycardia
 Incomplete or complete RBBB
 RAD
 S1Q3T3 complex
 T wave inversion in leads III, aVf
 T wave inversion in leads V1-V4 – greatest accuracy for identification of right
INVESTIGATIONS
INVESTIGATIONS
 CHEST X-RAY
 Hampton’s Hump
 Westermark’s Sign
 Pallas Sign
INVESTIGATIONS
INVESTIGATIONS
 ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
 Normal in about half of cases
 Not recommended for routine
diagnostic test
 SIGNS:
 RV enlargement or hypokinesis with
apical sparing( The McConnel Sign)
 IV septal flattening and paradoxical
motion toward left ventricle
 Tricuspid regurgitation
 Pulmonary hypertension
 Dilated IVC
 Direct visualization of thrombus
INVESTIGATIONS
 CHEST COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
 Has supplanted pulmonary radionuclide
perfusion scintigraphy
 Overall negative predictive value 99.4%
 Both diagnostic and prognostic test.
 One-stop shop.
 Also other lung diseases can be scanned
 RV enlargement protends a complicated
hospital course.
INVESTIGATIONS
 Lung Scanning
 Uses radio labelled aggregates of albumin or microspheres that lodge in pulmonary
microvasculature.
 Multiple perfusion defects.
 Ventilation perfusion mismatch.
 Magnetic resonance imaging
 Pulmonary angiography
 Formerly the reference standard
 Now, rarely performed.
 But is required when interventions are planned
 Doppler venous ultrasound
Diagnostic approach
 Pretest probability assessment
 D- Dimer testing
 Definitive diagnostic imaging
MANAGEMENT
 Initial management
 In Massive PE
 Circulatory support
 IV Fluids
 Vasopressors
 Respiratory support
 Supplemental oxygen
 Ventillatory support
MANAGEMENT
 ANTICOAGULATION
 Unfractionated heparin
 Starting bolus of 80 units/kg, followed by an infusion at 18 units/kg per hour
 Titrate the infusion rate every four to six hours to a goal activated partial
thromboplastin time (aPTT).
 Low molecular heparin
 Inj Enoxaparin 60 mg SC BD
 Inj Fondaparinux 5 mg SC OD
MANAGEMENT - THROMBOLYSIS
 In Massive PE
 Overall, 90% of patients with PE appear to respond favourably to
thrombolysis as indicated by clinical and echocardiographic improvement
within the first 36 h.
 The greatest benefit is observed when treatment is initiated within 48 h of
symptom onset, but thrombolysis can still be useful in patients who have had
symptoms for 6–14 days.
European Heart Journal (2012) 33, 3014–3022
SURGICAL OR INTERVENTIONAL
TREATMENT
 Pulmonary embolectomy
 Catheter directed thrombolysis
 Thrombus fragmenation
 Rheolytic thrombectomy
 Suction thrombectomy
 Rotational thrombectomy
 Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis
MANAGEMENT
 IVC filters
 Used as a means of primary or secondary PE prevention.
 Retrievable inferior venacava filters have a place mostly when
 anticoagulation is absolutely contraindicated, or
 in cases of recurrence despite therapeutic dosing of
anticoagulants
SECONDARY PROPHYLAXIS
 Warfarin
 Target INR 2-3.
 New oral anticoagulants
 Rivaroxaban
 Apixaban
 Dabigatran
SECONDARY PROPHYLAXIS
Optimal duration of antucoagulation
CLINICAL SETTINGS RECOMMENDATION
First provoked PE/proximal DVT 3 to 6 months
First provoked upper extremity DVT or
isolated calf DVT
3 months
Second provoked DVT Uncertain
Third VTE Indefinite duration
Cancer and VTE Indefinite duration or until cancer is
resolved
Unprovoked PE/proximal leg DVT Consider indefinite duration
First unprovoked calf DVT 3 months
Second unprovoked calf DVT Uncertian
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
 Anxiety, pleurisy, costocondritis
 Pneumonia, bronchitis
 Myocardial infarction
 Pericarditis
 Congestive cardiac failure
 Idiopathic pulmonary hypertension
PREVENTION
 Most preventable cause of inhospital death.
 Pharmacological prophylaxis measures.
 IV Heparin
 IV Enoxaparin
 New oral anticoagulants
 Mechanical measures:
 Intermittent pneumatic compression
 Graduated compression stockings
PROGNOSIS
 If Left untreated, 30% mortality. But decreases to around 10 % with
anticogulation.
 Death usually within first 7 days.
 Recurrence of PE. 25% at 5 years
 Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension(CTEPH)(1-4%)
TAKE HOME MESSAGE
 High Suspicion
 Rapid and accurate risk stratification into stable and
unstable PE.
 All patients should receive injectable anticoagulation.
 High risk PE should undergo immediate thrombolytic,
surgical or interventional therapy.
 Personalized assessment for optimal duration of
anticoagulation.
 Emerging management strategies may simplify secondary
prevention in future.
10. Pulmonary Embolism.pptx

10. Pulmonary Embolism.pptx

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
    INTRODUCTION • One of“the big three” cardiovascular killers. • Case fatality rate about 15%. • Survivors with impaired quality of life. • Common problem yet difficult to diagnose. • No diagnostic test in utility unless PE is kept in D/D. • Prevention is much easier than diagnosis and treatment.
  • 4.
    CLASSIFICATION  Clinical classification MASSIVE PE  SUB MASSIVE PE  SMALL TO MODERATE PE
  • 5.
    CLASSIFICATION  Temporal classification Acute  Subacute  Chronic  Anatomical  Saddle  Lobar  Segmental  Subsegmental
  • 6.
  • 7.
    PATHOPHYSIOLOGY • Modifiable riskfactors: • Obesity • Metabolic syndrome • Cigarette smoking • Hypertension • Abnormal lipid profile
  • 8.
    PATHOPHYSIOLOGY • Not readilymodifiable risk factors • Advancing age • Arterial disease • Personal or family history • Recent surgery, trauma or immobility • CCF • COPD • Air pollution • Long haul air travel • Pregnancy, OC pills • Cardiac devices • Hypercoagulable states • Factor V Leiden • Prothrombin gene mutation • Antithrombin deficiency • Protein C deficiency • Protein S deficiency • Antiphospholipid anti body syndrome
  • 9.
    PATHOPHYSIOLOGY  Relationship betweenDVT and PE :  Thrombus forms in vein  Via venacava to RA and RV  Pulmonary arterial circulation  Large embolus may lodge at bifurcation of pulmonary artery forming saddle embolus.  More commonly major pulmonary vessel is occluded.  Usually in patients with PE, no doppler evidence of DVT.
  • 10.
  • 11.
    PATHOPHYSIOLOGY • Pulmonary Infarction,atelectasis • Increased pulmonary vascular resistance caused by vascular obstruction, neurohormonal changes or baroreceptors • Impaired gas exchange • Alveolar hyperventilation due to reflex stimulation of irritant receptors • RV dysfunction and failure • Myocardial ischemia and circulatory failure
  • 12.
    CLINICAL FEATURES  S/Snonspecific.  Clinical suspicion is of paramount importance.  SYMPTOMS  Otherwise unexplained dyspnea  Chest pain either pleuritic or atypical  Anxiety  Cough
  • 13.
    CLINICAL FEATURES  SIGNS Tachypnea  Tachycardia  Low grade fever  Left parasternal lift  TR murmur  Loud P2  Leg edema, erythema, tenderness
  • 14.
    Pretest probability assessment CLASSICWELLS CRITERIA SCORE POINTS DVT symptoms or signs 3 An alternative diagnosis is less likely than PE 3 Heart rate >100/min 1.5 Immobilization or surgery within 4 weeks 1.5 Prior DVT or PE 1.5 Hemoptysis 1 Cancer treated within 6 months or metastatic 1
  • 16.
    INVESTIGATIONS  NONIMAGING METHODS CBC, RFT, BNP, Troponin  Plasma D-dimer assay  Highly sensitive but not specific.  Other causes of elevations should be ruled out.  ABG analysis  Electrocardiogram  Normal  Sinus tachycardia  Incomplete or complete RBBB  RAD  S1Q3T3 complex  T wave inversion in leads III, aVf  T wave inversion in leads V1-V4 – greatest accuracy for identification of right
  • 17.
  • 18.
    INVESTIGATIONS  CHEST X-RAY Hampton’s Hump  Westermark’s Sign  Pallas Sign
  • 19.
  • 20.
    INVESTIGATIONS  ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY  Normalin about half of cases  Not recommended for routine diagnostic test  SIGNS:  RV enlargement or hypokinesis with apical sparing( The McConnel Sign)  IV septal flattening and paradoxical motion toward left ventricle  Tricuspid regurgitation  Pulmonary hypertension  Dilated IVC  Direct visualization of thrombus
  • 21.
    INVESTIGATIONS  CHEST COMPUTEDTOMOGRAPHY  Has supplanted pulmonary radionuclide perfusion scintigraphy  Overall negative predictive value 99.4%  Both diagnostic and prognostic test.  One-stop shop.  Also other lung diseases can be scanned  RV enlargement protends a complicated hospital course.
  • 22.
    INVESTIGATIONS  Lung Scanning Uses radio labelled aggregates of albumin or microspheres that lodge in pulmonary microvasculature.  Multiple perfusion defects.  Ventilation perfusion mismatch.  Magnetic resonance imaging  Pulmonary angiography  Formerly the reference standard  Now, rarely performed.  But is required when interventions are planned  Doppler venous ultrasound
  • 23.
    Diagnostic approach  Pretestprobability assessment  D- Dimer testing  Definitive diagnostic imaging
  • 24.
    MANAGEMENT  Initial management In Massive PE  Circulatory support  IV Fluids  Vasopressors  Respiratory support  Supplemental oxygen  Ventillatory support
  • 25.
    MANAGEMENT  ANTICOAGULATION  Unfractionatedheparin  Starting bolus of 80 units/kg, followed by an infusion at 18 units/kg per hour  Titrate the infusion rate every four to six hours to a goal activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).  Low molecular heparin  Inj Enoxaparin 60 mg SC BD  Inj Fondaparinux 5 mg SC OD
  • 26.
    MANAGEMENT - THROMBOLYSIS In Massive PE  Overall, 90% of patients with PE appear to respond favourably to thrombolysis as indicated by clinical and echocardiographic improvement within the first 36 h.  The greatest benefit is observed when treatment is initiated within 48 h of symptom onset, but thrombolysis can still be useful in patients who have had symptoms for 6–14 days.
  • 27.
    European Heart Journal(2012) 33, 3014–3022
  • 29.
    SURGICAL OR INTERVENTIONAL TREATMENT Pulmonary embolectomy  Catheter directed thrombolysis  Thrombus fragmenation  Rheolytic thrombectomy  Suction thrombectomy  Rotational thrombectomy  Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis
  • 30.
    MANAGEMENT  IVC filters Used as a means of primary or secondary PE prevention.  Retrievable inferior venacava filters have a place mostly when  anticoagulation is absolutely contraindicated, or  in cases of recurrence despite therapeutic dosing of anticoagulants
  • 31.
    SECONDARY PROPHYLAXIS  Warfarin Target INR 2-3.  New oral anticoagulants  Rivaroxaban  Apixaban  Dabigatran
  • 32.
    SECONDARY PROPHYLAXIS Optimal durationof antucoagulation CLINICAL SETTINGS RECOMMENDATION First provoked PE/proximal DVT 3 to 6 months First provoked upper extremity DVT or isolated calf DVT 3 months Second provoked DVT Uncertain Third VTE Indefinite duration Cancer and VTE Indefinite duration or until cancer is resolved Unprovoked PE/proximal leg DVT Consider indefinite duration First unprovoked calf DVT 3 months Second unprovoked calf DVT Uncertian
  • 33.
    DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS  Anxiety,pleurisy, costocondritis  Pneumonia, bronchitis  Myocardial infarction  Pericarditis  Congestive cardiac failure  Idiopathic pulmonary hypertension
  • 34.
    PREVENTION  Most preventablecause of inhospital death.  Pharmacological prophylaxis measures.  IV Heparin  IV Enoxaparin  New oral anticoagulants  Mechanical measures:  Intermittent pneumatic compression  Graduated compression stockings
  • 35.
    PROGNOSIS  If Leftuntreated, 30% mortality. But decreases to around 10 % with anticogulation.  Death usually within first 7 days.  Recurrence of PE. 25% at 5 years  Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension(CTEPH)(1-4%)
  • 36.
    TAKE HOME MESSAGE High Suspicion  Rapid and accurate risk stratification into stable and unstable PE.  All patients should receive injectable anticoagulation.  High risk PE should undergo immediate thrombolytic, surgical or interventional therapy.  Personalized assessment for optimal duration of anticoagulation.  Emerging management strategies may simplify secondary prevention in future.

Editor's Notes

  • #35 Riva: 15 mg bd for 3 weeks, then 20 mg od…no overlap In the EINSTEIN-PE study,6 4832 patients were enrolled. Recurrent venous thrombo-embolism occurred in 2.1% of patients receiving rivaroxaban compared with 1.8% of those on standard enoxaparin/warfarin therapy. Rivaroxaban was non-inferior to standard therapy (P ¼ 0.003). Major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 10.3% of rivaroxaban patients compared with 11.4% standard therapy patients (P ¼ 0.32); however, major bleeding was observed in only 1.1% of patients taking rivaroxaban compared with 2.2% of those on enoxaparin/warfarin