Authors: Simon Smith, Effie Dalakiouridou.
This paper contextualises the benefits and challenges of participation and eParticipation in the EU in two respects: historically and theoretically.
This document provides a critical review of a paper by van Bortel and Mullins (2009) that analyzed the shift from vertical to horizontal network governance in urban regeneration projects. The review discusses how previous regeneration initiatives were top-down but have increasingly involved local councils, private sectors, and communities. While network governance has benefits like increased community consultation, it also has drawbacks such as potential power imbalances between actors. The review examines different perspectives on the influence and effectiveness of network versus hierarchical governance approaches.
J Millward Citizen Involvement In The Policy ProcessJason Millward
This document discusses citizen involvement in the policy process in Australia. It finds that while demands for greater citizen engagement and needs for new ways of government operation could foster more involvement, Australia's experience has been limited by bureaucratic rules and governments focused on media and elections. Recent examples of citizen involvement in Australia include welfare reform trials in Indigenous communities, but fully embedding these successes has faced challenges. The document suggests greater use of online tools could enable more iterative citizen engagement in policy processes and parliamentary inquiries.
Citizenship, Democracy, and ProfessionalismJay Hays
This document presents a curriculum for citizenship, democracy, and professionalism. It discusses six interdependent elements - citizenship, democracy, professionalism, empowerment, community, and sustainability. It argues these elements form a complex adaptive system and must work together synergistically. The curriculum is designed to develop the capabilities and dispositions that these elements require to build and sustain healthy communities. It involves learning through doing, working collaboratively, and engaging in critical reflection.
Local governance, democracy and representationRachel Palmen
This document discusses local governance, democracy, and representation. It summarizes research on participatory governance spaces in two case studies - a neighborhood regeneration program in England and participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre, Brazil. The research found that while increased participation is assumed to lead to better representation, this is often not the case in practice. Conceptions of representation varied between key players and community representatives, and were used strategically to either legitimize or dismiss community input. Representation of minority groups also proved problematic.
This document discusses how a complex systems perspective can provide an interpretative application in futures studies. It hypothesizes that using concepts from complexity science to reinterpret drivers of change called DESTEP factors could better integrate complexity into pragmatic futures exploration. The document explores this approach through examples of applying complexity concepts like political subsystems and the edge of chaos to reinterpret political polarization, and through examples of two futures studies projects where this reinterpretation inspired new scenario narratives. It concludes that complexity science has potential to shift feedback loops strengthening problems like polarization towards more cooperative interactions and influence pragmatic futures outcomes.
Presentation by Yanuar Nugroho for the "Knowledge Economy and Information Society" course, dealing with the use of IT and the internet in Civil Society Organisations (roughly, these are voluntary, NGOs).
The document discusses how hydraulic fracturing is portrayed in the media and the influence this has. It analyzes the issue from public relations and media perspectives using an interdisciplinary approach. Key insights include how public relations professionals frame issues regarding fracking but the media can further distort the messages through agenda setting and framing. There is also conflict as both fields use the same theories like framing but implement them differently based on their goals and disciplines. The document proposes finding common ground between the perspectives to help form a collaborative solution.
This document provides a critical review of a paper by van Bortel and Mullins (2009) that analyzed the shift from vertical to horizontal network governance in urban regeneration projects. The review discusses how previous regeneration initiatives were top-down but have increasingly involved local councils, private sectors, and communities. While network governance has benefits like increased community consultation, it also has drawbacks such as potential power imbalances between actors. The review examines different perspectives on the influence and effectiveness of network versus hierarchical governance approaches.
J Millward Citizen Involvement In The Policy ProcessJason Millward
This document discusses citizen involvement in the policy process in Australia. It finds that while demands for greater citizen engagement and needs for new ways of government operation could foster more involvement, Australia's experience has been limited by bureaucratic rules and governments focused on media and elections. Recent examples of citizen involvement in Australia include welfare reform trials in Indigenous communities, but fully embedding these successes has faced challenges. The document suggests greater use of online tools could enable more iterative citizen engagement in policy processes and parliamentary inquiries.
Citizenship, Democracy, and ProfessionalismJay Hays
This document presents a curriculum for citizenship, democracy, and professionalism. It discusses six interdependent elements - citizenship, democracy, professionalism, empowerment, community, and sustainability. It argues these elements form a complex adaptive system and must work together synergistically. The curriculum is designed to develop the capabilities and dispositions that these elements require to build and sustain healthy communities. It involves learning through doing, working collaboratively, and engaging in critical reflection.
Local governance, democracy and representationRachel Palmen
This document discusses local governance, democracy, and representation. It summarizes research on participatory governance spaces in two case studies - a neighborhood regeneration program in England and participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre, Brazil. The research found that while increased participation is assumed to lead to better representation, this is often not the case in practice. Conceptions of representation varied between key players and community representatives, and were used strategically to either legitimize or dismiss community input. Representation of minority groups also proved problematic.
This document discusses how a complex systems perspective can provide an interpretative application in futures studies. It hypothesizes that using concepts from complexity science to reinterpret drivers of change called DESTEP factors could better integrate complexity into pragmatic futures exploration. The document explores this approach through examples of applying complexity concepts like political subsystems and the edge of chaos to reinterpret political polarization, and through examples of two futures studies projects where this reinterpretation inspired new scenario narratives. It concludes that complexity science has potential to shift feedback loops strengthening problems like polarization towards more cooperative interactions and influence pragmatic futures outcomes.
Presentation by Yanuar Nugroho for the "Knowledge Economy and Information Society" course, dealing with the use of IT and the internet in Civil Society Organisations (roughly, these are voluntary, NGOs).
The document discusses how hydraulic fracturing is portrayed in the media and the influence this has. It analyzes the issue from public relations and media perspectives using an interdisciplinary approach. Key insights include how public relations professionals frame issues regarding fracking but the media can further distort the messages through agenda setting and framing. There is also conflict as both fields use the same theories like framing but implement them differently based on their goals and disciplines. The document proposes finding common ground between the perspectives to help form a collaborative solution.
E-consultations: New tools for civic engagement or facades for political corr...ePractice.eu
E-consultations are emerging as a popular tool for civic engagement in policymaking. While they provide new opportunities for interaction between citizens and political actors, their actual impact on policy outcomes is less clear. Existing evidence suggests that citizen inputs from e-consultations are often arbitrarily integrated into policies and their inclusion depends on political will. This raises the question of whether e-consultations meaningfully engage citizens or merely serve as facades of political correctness in the online space.
Ponencia marco impartida por el presidente de la Asociación Kyopol -Pedro Prieto Martín- en el marco de la jornada sobre Redes Digitales y Participación Local organizada por la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, el 16 de Mayo de 2013.
Lee más sobre el evento en: http://rumboalorien.kyopol.net/redes-digitales-y-participacion-local/
-- "Challenges for the application of ICT for participation at the local level"
Keynote Speech by Pedro Prieto-Martín (President of the Association Kyopol) in the Workshop on "Digital Networks and Local Participation" organised by the Univesitat Autónoma de Barcelona, May 16th, 2013.
Read about the event here: http://roadtolorien.kyopol.net/digital-networks-and-local-participation/
Theorizing Citizenship in Late Modern ICT SocietiesJakob Svensson
This document discusses theorizing citizenship in late modern information and communication technology (ICT) societies. It proposes understanding citizenship as participation and action upon shared meanings regarding societal organization. Citizenship is enacted in political communities that address societal organization and construct values and norms. The paper aims to define citizenship in networked and individualized societies by avoiding deterministic views of technology or society, and recognizing their mutual reinforcement. It explores how digital technologies and late modern societal changes interact and challenge conceptions of political participation and citizenship.
This document discusses local governance and the role of associations in collective management in the city of Agadir, Morocco. It examines how local governance that promotes participation of associations can improve management of public affairs. The study hypothesizes that effective collective management requires involvement of local people through associations. It analyzes definitions of participation and levels of citizen involvement. Associations in Agadir contribute to management by supporting initiatives for human development, strengthening social ties, and inventorying their roles. While associations play a strategic role, their participation in management remains limited due to lack of resources and support from local authorities.
This document appears to be a student's assignment responses for a public management course. It includes the student's name, course code, title, assignment, and lecturer. The responses provide summaries of concepts like Arnstein's Ladder of Participation and analyses of a case study about William Robertson, a public administrator in Los Angeles. Key stakeholders that ensured Robertson's success included neighborhood councils, elected officials, peers, and subordinates. He identified and responded to their needs through various engagement strategies.
We make the Future - Communications CampMaija Viherä
The document describes Communication Camps, which are week-long camps that aim to inspire future orientation through hands-on media production and interaction. Key aspects include:
- Camps have been held since 1987 and involve participants producing a daily newspaper, video, radio program, and staffing an information desk through rotating roles.
- They aim to teach communication skills and meet basic human needs of organization, belonging, and having a meaningful role through the collaborative media production and community experience.
- Technology is used to enhance interaction and self-expression, with the goal of preparing participants for an envisioned future "Interaction Society" with widespread communication abilities.
Intermunicipal cooperation municipal amalgamation and the price of creditBernard Ommeren,van
This document discusses a study examining the effects of intermunicipal cooperation and municipal amalgamation on the price of credit in the Netherlands. The study finds that intermunicipal organizations consistently pay higher interest rates on loans than municipalities, despite having an identical credit risk of zero. Municipal amalgamation does not result in higher interest rates. The number of municipalities cooperating in an intermunicipal organization does not affect interest rates. This suggests that the introduction of extra hierarchical layers from cooperation, and reduced monitoring, are probable explanations for the higher interest rates paid by intermunicipal organizations.
Cs regulation part i background on ngo accountabilityGhetnet Metiku
The document provides background information on accountability in the civil society/NGO sector. It discusses how NGO accountability has gained increased prominence due to the growth in number and role of NGOs. It defines key concepts such as what accountability means for NGOs. The document analyzes the four core elements of NGO accountability: who is accountable, to whom, for what, and how. It discusses how NGOs are accountable to a range of internal and external stakeholders, and the complexity of balancing these relationships. The document also outlines different mechanisms for NGO accountability, including mandatory regulatory frameworks and voluntary self-regulation approaches.
Critical evaluation of the potential of stakeholder theory to contribute to u...Kennedy Mbwette
Critical evaluation of the potential of stakeholder theory to contribute to understanding of large-scale public service IT projects and their implementation
10 kelly mulgan muers creating public valueJordi Puig
This document discusses the concept of "public value" as a framework for assessing the goals and performance of public policy. It argues that public value provides a broader measure than traditional approaches, taking into account outcomes, means of delivery, trust, legitimacy, equity, and accountability. The document outlines three dimensions of public value - services, outcomes, and trust/legitimacy - and examines how well current public management addresses each dimension. It concludes by suggesting tools and techniques need to be adapted to make public value a practical concept for policymaking.
REDD+ Policy Network Analysis: Update and IntroductionCIFOR-ICRAF
Updates from CIFOR research on Policy Network Analysis of REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation). Read the papers at www1.cifor.org/gcs/about-gcs/national-redd-processes-and-policies/policy-network-analysis-actors-and-power-structures.html
Participatory Communication and the Interplay of Counter Insurgency in Nigeri...inventionjournals
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
Plenary agnes meinhard_immigrant integration and inclusionocasiconference
This document discusses immigrant integration and inclusion in Canada from a complex systems perspective. It examines the many players that work together both formally and informally to help immigrants settle into Canadian society. This includes governments that design settlement programs, and organizations that implement these programs. The research aims to understand how these complex partnerships serve both new immigrants and Canadian society. A model is presented that depicts concentric circles representing different players and jurisdictions that must work together synergistically to help immigrants achieve full citizenship. The research will examine relationships between various players through six related research pods, in order to provide a holistic understanding of how partnerships can be improved to better serve immigrants through the integration process.
Community participation the arnstein ladderTim Curtis
The document discusses different levels of community participation, from non-participation to citizen control. It presents the "Arnstein ladder" which ranks levels of tokenism and non-participation at the bottom rungs versus citizen power and citizen control at the top. Lower rungs include informing, consultation, placation while higher rungs involve partnerships, delegated power, and citizen control. It also discusses common strategies for participation like citizens' juries and barriers to meaningful participation from both community members and powerholders.
This document discusses principles for how development should happen after 2015 based on participatory research with people experiencing poverty in 29 countries. It calls for a post-2015 framework that recognizes the rights and priorities of those in extreme poverty and marginalization. It emphasizes that change must occur through more democratic and accountable relationships between citizens and governments. Sustainable change requires addressing the multiple and intersecting inequalities that characterize extreme poverty, through a holistic people-centered approach. The document recommends basing the post-2015 framework on rights and meaningful participation of the poorest in policymaking to improve accountability.
2013vol26nr2 finale versie-druk_-article_p_debusscherDr Lendy Spires
This document examines how the European Union frames gender equality in its development aid towards Sub-Saharan Africa compared to civil society organizations. It analyzes 28 EU policy documents and compares them to 10 texts from civil society groups using critical frame analysis. The document finds that while the EU promotes gender mainstreaming, its approach focuses more on using gender equality to achieve existing development goals rather than challenging gender relations or power structures, which is more in line with the frames of civil society organizations. There is a gap between the EU's policy framing of gender issues and the views expressed by civil society that can be partly explained by the EU's reluctance to fully incorporate civil society perspectives.
CO e-Service: the Italian eGovernment revolution for the Compulsory Communica...ePractice.eu
The CO e-Service is an innovative Italian e-government system that centralizes and standardizes reporting of employment status data. It allows real-time sharing of information between public and private employers and agencies that manage employment services. The system simplifies administrative processes, increases efficiency and transparency, and helps combat undeclared work. Since launching in January 2008, over 10 million notifications have been processed from 380,000 registered users, demonstrating its success in streamlining reporting obligations.
Methodologies to identify best practice in barrier-free web design ePractice.eu
The document discusses the BIENE-Wettbewerb contest in Germany which aims to identify and honor the most accessible websites. It began in 2003 to promote accessible web design for people with disabilities. Websites are evaluated based on criteria for accessibility and usability by an advisory board and jury. The contest methodology involves application categories, a three-step evaluation process, and input from disability organizations. In 2007, the criteria were adjusted based on a study examining how people with disabilities can benefit from new Web 2.0 technologies.
Creating a regional agency to foster eInclusion: the case of South Yorkshire,...ePractice.eu
Author: Bridgette Wessels
The focus within regions in Europe, in line with the Riga Ministerial Declaration (2006), is to foster eInclusion by providing access for all, building e-skills and e-literacy, providing broadband infrastructures and inclusive eGovernment. Regional partnerships are emerging as agents in creating innovative use of information and communication technology (ICT) for eInclusion in relation to local needs, contexts and aspirations.
Good practice exchange from a Web 2.0 point of viewePractice.eu
Authors: Ramon Sangüesa and Roc Fages
In this paper we summarize our findings, explore three significant initiatives and try to identify future trends in the interconnection of good practice exchange and 2.0 potentialities.
The document discusses how universities can better utilize Web 2.0 technologies like social networking, self-publishing and collaboration platforms to improve teaching, research, and administration. It suggests moving beyond traditional virtual learning environments to a more personalized learning environment that connects users to university resources in a way that suits each individual user. Participants are asked to collaborate in discussing how their university's learning development department could exploit Web 2.0 tools to enhance communication and collaboration.
E-consultations: New tools for civic engagement or facades for political corr...ePractice.eu
E-consultations are emerging as a popular tool for civic engagement in policymaking. While they provide new opportunities for interaction between citizens and political actors, their actual impact on policy outcomes is less clear. Existing evidence suggests that citizen inputs from e-consultations are often arbitrarily integrated into policies and their inclusion depends on political will. This raises the question of whether e-consultations meaningfully engage citizens or merely serve as facades of political correctness in the online space.
Ponencia marco impartida por el presidente de la Asociación Kyopol -Pedro Prieto Martín- en el marco de la jornada sobre Redes Digitales y Participación Local organizada por la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, el 16 de Mayo de 2013.
Lee más sobre el evento en: http://rumboalorien.kyopol.net/redes-digitales-y-participacion-local/
-- "Challenges for the application of ICT for participation at the local level"
Keynote Speech by Pedro Prieto-Martín (President of the Association Kyopol) in the Workshop on "Digital Networks and Local Participation" organised by the Univesitat Autónoma de Barcelona, May 16th, 2013.
Read about the event here: http://roadtolorien.kyopol.net/digital-networks-and-local-participation/
Theorizing Citizenship in Late Modern ICT SocietiesJakob Svensson
This document discusses theorizing citizenship in late modern information and communication technology (ICT) societies. It proposes understanding citizenship as participation and action upon shared meanings regarding societal organization. Citizenship is enacted in political communities that address societal organization and construct values and norms. The paper aims to define citizenship in networked and individualized societies by avoiding deterministic views of technology or society, and recognizing their mutual reinforcement. It explores how digital technologies and late modern societal changes interact and challenge conceptions of political participation and citizenship.
This document discusses local governance and the role of associations in collective management in the city of Agadir, Morocco. It examines how local governance that promotes participation of associations can improve management of public affairs. The study hypothesizes that effective collective management requires involvement of local people through associations. It analyzes definitions of participation and levels of citizen involvement. Associations in Agadir contribute to management by supporting initiatives for human development, strengthening social ties, and inventorying their roles. While associations play a strategic role, their participation in management remains limited due to lack of resources and support from local authorities.
This document appears to be a student's assignment responses for a public management course. It includes the student's name, course code, title, assignment, and lecturer. The responses provide summaries of concepts like Arnstein's Ladder of Participation and analyses of a case study about William Robertson, a public administrator in Los Angeles. Key stakeholders that ensured Robertson's success included neighborhood councils, elected officials, peers, and subordinates. He identified and responded to their needs through various engagement strategies.
We make the Future - Communications CampMaija Viherä
The document describes Communication Camps, which are week-long camps that aim to inspire future orientation through hands-on media production and interaction. Key aspects include:
- Camps have been held since 1987 and involve participants producing a daily newspaper, video, radio program, and staffing an information desk through rotating roles.
- They aim to teach communication skills and meet basic human needs of organization, belonging, and having a meaningful role through the collaborative media production and community experience.
- Technology is used to enhance interaction and self-expression, with the goal of preparing participants for an envisioned future "Interaction Society" with widespread communication abilities.
Intermunicipal cooperation municipal amalgamation and the price of creditBernard Ommeren,van
This document discusses a study examining the effects of intermunicipal cooperation and municipal amalgamation on the price of credit in the Netherlands. The study finds that intermunicipal organizations consistently pay higher interest rates on loans than municipalities, despite having an identical credit risk of zero. Municipal amalgamation does not result in higher interest rates. The number of municipalities cooperating in an intermunicipal organization does not affect interest rates. This suggests that the introduction of extra hierarchical layers from cooperation, and reduced monitoring, are probable explanations for the higher interest rates paid by intermunicipal organizations.
Cs regulation part i background on ngo accountabilityGhetnet Metiku
The document provides background information on accountability in the civil society/NGO sector. It discusses how NGO accountability has gained increased prominence due to the growth in number and role of NGOs. It defines key concepts such as what accountability means for NGOs. The document analyzes the four core elements of NGO accountability: who is accountable, to whom, for what, and how. It discusses how NGOs are accountable to a range of internal and external stakeholders, and the complexity of balancing these relationships. The document also outlines different mechanisms for NGO accountability, including mandatory regulatory frameworks and voluntary self-regulation approaches.
Critical evaluation of the potential of stakeholder theory to contribute to u...Kennedy Mbwette
Critical evaluation of the potential of stakeholder theory to contribute to understanding of large-scale public service IT projects and their implementation
10 kelly mulgan muers creating public valueJordi Puig
This document discusses the concept of "public value" as a framework for assessing the goals and performance of public policy. It argues that public value provides a broader measure than traditional approaches, taking into account outcomes, means of delivery, trust, legitimacy, equity, and accountability. The document outlines three dimensions of public value - services, outcomes, and trust/legitimacy - and examines how well current public management addresses each dimension. It concludes by suggesting tools and techniques need to be adapted to make public value a practical concept for policymaking.
REDD+ Policy Network Analysis: Update and IntroductionCIFOR-ICRAF
Updates from CIFOR research on Policy Network Analysis of REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation). Read the papers at www1.cifor.org/gcs/about-gcs/national-redd-processes-and-policies/policy-network-analysis-actors-and-power-structures.html
Participatory Communication and the Interplay of Counter Insurgency in Nigeri...inventionjournals
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
Plenary agnes meinhard_immigrant integration and inclusionocasiconference
This document discusses immigrant integration and inclusion in Canada from a complex systems perspective. It examines the many players that work together both formally and informally to help immigrants settle into Canadian society. This includes governments that design settlement programs, and organizations that implement these programs. The research aims to understand how these complex partnerships serve both new immigrants and Canadian society. A model is presented that depicts concentric circles representing different players and jurisdictions that must work together synergistically to help immigrants achieve full citizenship. The research will examine relationships between various players through six related research pods, in order to provide a holistic understanding of how partnerships can be improved to better serve immigrants through the integration process.
Community participation the arnstein ladderTim Curtis
The document discusses different levels of community participation, from non-participation to citizen control. It presents the "Arnstein ladder" which ranks levels of tokenism and non-participation at the bottom rungs versus citizen power and citizen control at the top. Lower rungs include informing, consultation, placation while higher rungs involve partnerships, delegated power, and citizen control. It also discusses common strategies for participation like citizens' juries and barriers to meaningful participation from both community members and powerholders.
This document discusses principles for how development should happen after 2015 based on participatory research with people experiencing poverty in 29 countries. It calls for a post-2015 framework that recognizes the rights and priorities of those in extreme poverty and marginalization. It emphasizes that change must occur through more democratic and accountable relationships between citizens and governments. Sustainable change requires addressing the multiple and intersecting inequalities that characterize extreme poverty, through a holistic people-centered approach. The document recommends basing the post-2015 framework on rights and meaningful participation of the poorest in policymaking to improve accountability.
2013vol26nr2 finale versie-druk_-article_p_debusscherDr Lendy Spires
This document examines how the European Union frames gender equality in its development aid towards Sub-Saharan Africa compared to civil society organizations. It analyzes 28 EU policy documents and compares them to 10 texts from civil society groups using critical frame analysis. The document finds that while the EU promotes gender mainstreaming, its approach focuses more on using gender equality to achieve existing development goals rather than challenging gender relations or power structures, which is more in line with the frames of civil society organizations. There is a gap between the EU's policy framing of gender issues and the views expressed by civil society that can be partly explained by the EU's reluctance to fully incorporate civil society perspectives.
CO e-Service: the Italian eGovernment revolution for the Compulsory Communica...ePractice.eu
The CO e-Service is an innovative Italian e-government system that centralizes and standardizes reporting of employment status data. It allows real-time sharing of information between public and private employers and agencies that manage employment services. The system simplifies administrative processes, increases efficiency and transparency, and helps combat undeclared work. Since launching in January 2008, over 10 million notifications have been processed from 380,000 registered users, demonstrating its success in streamlining reporting obligations.
Methodologies to identify best practice in barrier-free web design ePractice.eu
The document discusses the BIENE-Wettbewerb contest in Germany which aims to identify and honor the most accessible websites. It began in 2003 to promote accessible web design for people with disabilities. Websites are evaluated based on criteria for accessibility and usability by an advisory board and jury. The contest methodology involves application categories, a three-step evaluation process, and input from disability organizations. In 2007, the criteria were adjusted based on a study examining how people with disabilities can benefit from new Web 2.0 technologies.
Creating a regional agency to foster eInclusion: the case of South Yorkshire,...ePractice.eu
Author: Bridgette Wessels
The focus within regions in Europe, in line with the Riga Ministerial Declaration (2006), is to foster eInclusion by providing access for all, building e-skills and e-literacy, providing broadband infrastructures and inclusive eGovernment. Regional partnerships are emerging as agents in creating innovative use of information and communication technology (ICT) for eInclusion in relation to local needs, contexts and aspirations.
Good practice exchange from a Web 2.0 point of viewePractice.eu
Authors: Ramon Sangüesa and Roc Fages
In this paper we summarize our findings, explore three significant initiatives and try to identify future trends in the interconnection of good practice exchange and 2.0 potentialities.
The document discusses how universities can better utilize Web 2.0 technologies like social networking, self-publishing and collaboration platforms to improve teaching, research, and administration. It suggests moving beyond traditional virtual learning environments to a more personalized learning environment that connects users to university resources in a way that suits each individual user. Participants are asked to collaborate in discussing how their university's learning development department could exploit Web 2.0 tools to enhance communication and collaboration.
eGovernment measurement for policy makersePractice.eu
Author: Jeremy Millard.
The eGovernment policy focus has moved over the last five years from being mainly concerned with efficiency to being concerned both with efficiency and effectiveness. This paper examines the current and future development of eGovernment policy making, and the critical role that measurement and impact analysis has in it.
Towards a sustainable e-Participation implementation model ePractice.eu
Author: M. Sirajul Islam.
This paper proposes a framework for an effective e-Participation model that can be suitable under certain socio-economic settings and applicable to any country. Most of such previous initiatives were experimental in nature and lacked in both public awareness and clearly defined expected outcomes.
A new relevant relationship between communities and local authorities through...José Carlos Mota
This document discusses new models for digital creativity in the relationship between communities and local authorities. It addresses the difficulties in this relationship including a democratic deficit and lack of transparency. It sees potential for community self-organized civic movements to emerge and help improve citizen participation. There are challenges around coordinating these diverse groups and integrating their views. The role of technology could enable bottom-up and engaged processes to produce more democratic decision making through creative uses like online and offline dialogue arenas, knowledge facilitators, and knowledge sharing.
Energy Awareness and the Role of “Critical Mass” In Smart Citiesirjes
This document proposes a novel analytical model to define a new concept of critical mass in the context of spreading energy awareness in smart cities. The model incorporates centrality measures in both single-layer and multilayer social networks. Simulation results show that including centrality measures and a multilayer approach lowers the critical mass needed to trigger and spread good consumer habits. Specifically, the model calculates critical mass values using eigenvector centrality in single layers and a heterogeneous eigenvector-like centrality in multilayers. Considering network structure and central nodes' influence allows a smaller critical mass to foster diffusion compared to models that do not account for centrality. Extending the analysis to multilayers further reduces critical mass by increasing tie strength between nodes.
This article reflects, from a holistic and interdisciplinary perspective, on the challenges surrounding the development of eParticipation in Europe, with special focus on EU programs. To this end, we firstly assess the field’s practical and theoretical achievements and limitations, and corroborate that the progress of eParticipation in the last decade has not been completely satisfactory in spite of the significant share of resources invested to support it. We secondly attempt to diagnose and enlighten some of the field’s systemic problems and challenges which are responsible for this unsettling development. The domain’s maladies are grouped under tree main categories: (1) lack of a proper understanding and articulation with regard to the “Participation” field; (2) eParticipation community’s ‘founding biases’ around e-Government and academy; and (3) inadequacy of traditional Innovation Support Programmes to incentivize innovation in the eParticipation field. In the context of the ‘Europe 2020 Strategy’ and its flagship initiative “Innovation Union”, our final section provides several recommendations which could contribute to enhance the effectiveness of future European eParticipation actions.
This document defines and discusses several types of capital as they relate to digital citizenship and narrowing the digital divide. It defines human capital as the skills, abilities, and knowledge of employees that contribute to organizational performance. Knowledge capital is described as the know-how and experience within an organization that creates long-lasting competitive advantages. Social capital refers to the connections between individuals and groups that can provide economic benefits. The document also discusses how governments and stakeholders should collaborate to address factors that contribute to the digital divide through accessible e-services, understandable content, and strategic frameworks.
Innovating Public Service Delivery Through Crowdsourcing: What Role for The T...CSCJournals
The document discusses the use of crowdsourcing to innovate public service delivery. It begins by setting the context of New Public Governance and the need for more citizen engagement and public-private partnerships. It then reviews literature on crowdsourcing, defining it as outsourcing tasks to an undefined public via an open call. The paper aims to analyze examples of crowdsourcing in the public sector and assess the role of nonprofit organizations in facilitating these processes. It finds most examples are from English-speaking countries where citizens are consulted, not co-creators. The paper concludes that crowdsourcing could be expanded if nonprofits took a leadership role, improving communication between governments and citizens.
Hacia un método inductivo para investigar la formación de valores con respect...Alexandro Escudero-Nahón
Las condiciones económicas y políticas desafiantes están atrayendo a las personas a involucrarse en el compromiso cívico. Algunas de estas acciones están creando nuevas formas de participación y ampliando la ciudadanía activa, lo cual es deseable, pero otras amenazan los valores democráticos. La investigación en educación moral tiene el papel clave de descubrir la relación entre formas sin precedentes de ciudadanía activa y la formación de valores morales democráticos. Este artículo propone un proceso de investigación inductivo destinado a rastrear la formación de valores morales en la ciudadanía activa, teniendo como pilar la epistemología de la teoría del actor y la red, y el proceso de investigación general de la teoría fundamentada.
BIG SOCIETY, BIG DATA. THE RADICALISATION OF THE NETWORK SOCIETYTwittercrisis
This document discusses the emergence of the "big society" in the context of increasing digitization and the internet empowering citizens. It argues that citizens are now better informed and able to self-organize, challenging traditional power structures. While this has benefits like new models of crowdfunding, it also creates uncertainty around responsibilities. The network society is still developing, with citizens adopting new technologies faster than institutions. Overall, digitization is fueling a shift from top-down governance to a more horizontal and disruptive distribution of power between state, market and society.
1) The document discusses how communication can contribute to social change and empowerment through bottom-up approaches that involve local communities.
2) It provides examples of projects like Dream Hamar in Norway and workshops in Ecuador that engaged communities through participatory design processes and online platforms to reimagine public spaces.
3) These tactics prioritized communication and collaboration over top-down strategies, empowering communities and contributing to locally-owned reforms.
In order for the internet to play a greater role as an instrument for social and personal empowerment, we need to understand what the everyday life of an individual belonging to a minority or marginalized community encompasses. Such an approach calls for closer examination of the practices, system of relations and context of particular minority and marginalized users in order to figure out what is meaningful to them and how they use (or do not use) different forms of the internet for meeting their objectives. There is a need to acknowledge the multiple conceptualizations and forms of internet use as disadvantaged users apply these differently for meeting specific agendas.
This article presented three projects working with minority and marginalized users. In the context of future research on internet use, three broad sets of variables are closely connected and require careful attention:
• The type of marginalized group;
• The goals, expectations and identification of what particular marginalized users consider to be meaningful in their everyday life; and
• The selected method of research.
Balancing the Four Es; or Can We Achieve Equity for Socia.docxjoney4
Balancing the Four Es; or Can We Achieve Equity for Social Equity in Public
Administration?
Author(s): Kristen Norman-Major
Source: Journal of Public Affairs Education, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Spring 2011), pp. 233-252
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23036113
Accessed: 25-05-2020 01:51 UTC
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23036113?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Journal of Public Affairs Education
This content downloaded from 139.182.75.138 on Mon, 25 May 2020 01:51:03 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Balancing the Four Es;
or Can We Achieve Equity for
Social Equity in Public Administration?
Abstract
Although social equity was brought to the table in the New Public Administration
of the 1960s and named the fourth pillar of public administration by the National
Academy of Public Administration near the turn of this century, it still struggles
to find its place as an equal among the traditional public administration values
of economy efficiency, and effectiveness. The question to be addressed here is,
"How do we elevate social equity to equal playing status with the other pillars of
public administration?" In addressing this question, three key areas are examined:
definitions, measures, and curriculum. By examining how we currently define,
measure, and teach about the values of public administration, including social
equity, this paper provides ideas for "imagining and improving the future" so
that social equity becomes an equal among its peers and becomes a standard
of practice as opposed to a stand of courage among public administrators and
policy makers.
In 1968, a group of young public administration scholars gathered in
Minnowbrook, New York, to discuss a new direction for the study and practice
of public administration. Rejecting the traditional ideas of a politics-administration
dichotomy and public administration practiced by neutral competents, these
young scholars argued that public administration by its nature cannot be neutral;
it must consider the values of American society, including responsiveness, public
participation in decision making, social equity, citizen choice, and administrative
responsibility (Wooldridge & Gooden ...
Saskia Sassen - Digital Formations of the Powerless slidesttw2011
Digital networks unsettle standard meanings of knowledge by allowing widespread circulation. This informalizes and particularizes formalized knowledge. Networks open categories and trajectories for knowledge to exit institutional controls. Critical steps are informalizing knowledge and reassembling it into novel informal mixes, which can then feed into new political and economic conditions. Two cases examined are electronic financial networks and activist networks. Both utilize distributed access and interconnectivity but produce different outcomes due to non-technical variables like user social logics and objectives. Networks do not guarantee democratic or distributive outcomes but make globality a resource for diverse actors.
This document provides an overview of systems approaches to addressing complex public sector challenges. It discusses the need for systems thinking given increasing complexity in policy issues. Traditional linear and sectoral approaches are often inadequate for "wicked problems" that have many interconnected elements. The document then outlines some of the challenges of using systems approaches in the public sector, such as the difficulty of changing systems that must continue operating. It provides examples of systems approaches being used for issues like child protection, domestic violence, and transportation. The key is focusing on outcomes, bringing together multiple actors, and implementing interventions to transform existing systems into desired future systems. Case studies and emerging evidence suggest systems approaches have potential but also face challenges in public sector contexts.
Ladder of Citizen Participation Journal ReviewNicolai Sidek
This document summarizes Sherry Arnstein's 1969 article that introduced the "ladder of citizen participation", which outlines different levels of public participation in planning and decision making processes, ranging from non-participation to full citizen power. It discusses Arnstein's model and its limitations, as well as complementary models developed by others to address issues like location and approach. Overall, the document reviews literature on defining community participation and analyzing techniques to effectively involve communities to influence planning outcomes.
This document summarizes a paper on the effects of public administration reforms in Western Europe. It discusses how traditional bureaucratic structures and employment conditions for civil servants have changed over time due to factors like new public management doctrines, budget constraints, and demands for more private sector practices. While many countries have adopted reforms, there is little empirical evidence about their actual outcomes and effects. The document concludes that further research is still needed to understand what reform approaches work best under different conditions and how to balance various objectives around administrative efficiency, ethics, and workforce issues.
Global environmental governance involves multi-level interactions between various actors including states, non-state organizations, and grassroots groups. Grassroots organizations have increasingly engaged in global governance by reframing global norms, connecting different issue areas, and developing new forms of representation and expertise. For example, transnational indigenous networks have influenced climate negotiations to advocate for control over climate funds and territorial rights. Grassroots groups challenge global governance through new representative forms emerging from the local level and direct collective action.
Similar to Contextualising Public (e)Participation in the Governance of the European Union (20)
ePractice workshop on Open Source Software, 7 April 2011 - Matteo MelideoePractice.eu
The document discusses Qualipso Competence Centres, which aim to boost innovation and growth by fostering Free/Libre Open Source Software. The centres will form a federated network of organizations from industry, academia, and the public sector. They will provide expertise and services related to FLOSS, such as legal consultancy, interoperability testing, quality measurement, and business model advice. The centres will operate according to a shared framework defined in the Qualipso Network Agreement.
ePractice workshop on Open Source Software, 7 April 2011 - Daniel ColettiePractice.eu
The document discusses the growing success of open source software in the Argentinian federal government. It notes that the 2001 economic crisis proved that open source software is reliable, cheaper, and can help avoid costly software upgrades. The government is increasingly adopting open source strategies, either following Brazil's model of prioritizing domestic open source software or simply using open source solutions while remaining neutral. Several agencies such as the national tax administration, highway administration, and social security agency have implemented open source software successfully.
ePractice workshop on Open Source Software, 7 April 2011 - Flavia MarzanoePractice.eu
The document discusses key issues for cloud computing including data protection, interoperability, standardization, accessibility, and openness. The European Commissioner Neelie Kroes stated these were core objectives of her digital agenda policies. Additionally, the document calls for portability of data, code and applications between cloud providers to avoid vendor lock-in, as well as adoption of existing standards and open interfaces. It provides principles of an open cloud from an open cloud manifesto focusing on addressing challenges through collaboration and standards while promoting innovation.
ePractice workshop on Open Source Software, 7 April 2011 - Christina Gallar...ePractice.eu
The document summarizes the Osepa project, which aims to create synergies around open source software (OSS) adoption among public administrations in Europe. The project brings together partners from various countries and experience levels to share perspectives on technical, policy and other barriers to OSS adoption. Expected results include surveys of OSS usage, procurement guidelines, conferences, and recommendations to support a European strategy for public sector use of open source.
ePractice workshop on Open Source Software, 7 April 2011 - Thomas BiskupePractice.eu
The OpenSAGA project aims to provide a development platform for e-government applications that are compliant with the SAGA standard. The technical approach uses an executable web application model, graphical modeling, and the Eclipse IDE. The communal approach involves public sector partners, scientific councils, sponsors, and integration partners. After one year, there was a lack of knowledge about SAGA, lack of community and trust in open source for the public sector. Missing links include open source strategy, marketing, and lobbying in the public sector. Lessons learned are that a commercially viable open source approach exists with tangible benefits for the public sector.
ePractice workshop on Open Source Software, 7 April 2011 - Mikael Torp & Oll...ePractice.eu
A three year cross border project between universities in Sweden and Finland funded the development of a digital communication system between parents and daycares called Parents' Meeting. The system allows for 24/7 communication about daily activities and plans. It has been implemented in over 300 daycares and schools in Sweden and Finland. The project also developed two e-systems for the municipality of Korsholm using open source software to reduce costs compared to expensive proprietary systems. Going forward, the project aims to commercialize Parents' Meeting, strengthen the open source community around it, and help other municipalities implement similar systems.
ePractice workshop on Open Source Software, 7 April 2011 - Davide Dalle Carbo...ePractice.eu
The document discusses open source software and its role in cross-border environments. It describes a tool called Spago4Q that measures and monitors quality in ICT products, processes, and services. Spago4Q uses open standards and models to define service level agreements and key performance indicators. It provides dashboards and reports to ensure transparency and help public administrations purchase quality services.
ePractice workshop on Open Source Software, 7 April 2011 - Philippe LaurentePractice.eu
Compatibility of free and open source software (FLOSS) licenses refers to whether code distributed under different licenses can be combined. Strict compatibility is one-way, as GPL code cannot be added to BSD code, though BSD code can be added to GPL. Copyleft licenses like GPL have predominant effect, making other licenses incompatible. Newer licenses like GPLv3 and EUPL include clauses to improve compatibility, such as allowing additional permissions or defining compatible licenses. Compatibility issues must be considered before and during development to allow code reuse and acceptability.
ePractice workshop on Open Source Software, 7 April 2011- Patrice-Emmanuel Sc...ePractice.eu
The EUPL is an open source license approved by the European Commission to promote sharing of software between governments in Europe. It provides a common legal framework for licensing software in all EU languages. Several EU countries have begun adopting policies that recommend or require the use of the EUPL for government-developed software. While adoption is still uneven, the EUPL is establishing itself as an important part of the legal infrastructure supporting open source and sharing of software in the public sector in Europe.
ePractice workshop on Open Source Software, 7 April 2011-Panagiotis Rentzepop...ePractice.eu
OSOR.eu is a collaborative platform launched in 2008 by the European Commission to help public administrations share open-source IT solutions, experiences, and knowledge. The platform includes an observatory with news and studies to inform decision-makers, and a repository where developers can upload, download, and collaborate on over 2,400 open-source projects under licenses like the EUPL. OSOR.eu aims to promote open-source software adoption among public administrations by allowing them to find and reuse existing solutions.
ePractice workshop on Open Source Software, 7 April 2011- Szabolcs Szekaks, ...ePractice.eu
This document discusses the rationale and benefits of strategic collaboration between organizations. It argues that collaboration can improve visibility, reduce costs, increase transparency, remove barriers, and reduce time to market by allowing organizations to share resources and solutions. The document introduces the ISA Programme, which facilitates cross-border cooperation between public entities to jointly deliver electronic services. It lists key principles of the programme like technological neutrality and sharing of code, assets, and best practices. It also references related projects and websites for open-source software and interoperability.
Eyepea implemented an open source VoIP solution for EURid using Asterisk. EURid is the European registry for .eu domain names and needed an enterprise telephony system to support its distributed call centers for registrars across Europe. The new system provides high availability, intranet integration for call center agents, and SIP trunking between data centers. After six months of operation, the solution has had 100% uptime and a high level of satisfaction among customers, agents, and management.
ePractice workshop on Open Source Software, 7 April 2011- Jacques GripekovenePractice.eu
Eyepea implemented an open source VoIP solution for EURid using Asterisk. EURid is the European registry for .eu domain names and needed an enterprise telephony system to support its distributed call centers for registrars across Europe. The new system provides high availability, intranet integration for call center agents, and SIP trunking between data centers. After six months of operation, the solution has achieved 100% uptime and a high level of satisfaction among customers, agents, and management.
ePractice: eProcurement Workshop 25 May 2011 - Van SteelandtePractice.eu
The document summarizes Flanders' action plan to mandate e-submission for public contracts between 2010 and 2011. Key points include:
- E-submission was allowed starting in 2010 and became mandatory in 2011 for all public contracts in Flanders.
- The action plan provided training for 800 government officials and support for economic operators through an online help desk and road shows.
- Metrics such as the percentage of contracts with e-submission and e-tenders were used to measure progress of both public authorities and economic operators in adopting e-procurement.
- Issues around e-signatures for foreign companies were addressed to reduce costs and comply with EU law.
ePractice: eProcurement Workshop 25 May 2011 - Dusan SoltesePractice.eu
The document discusses the current state of e-procurement in the EU. It outlines the main benefits expected from e-procurement such as increased transparency, wider reach, and support for SMEs. However, implementation at the national level has been slow and inconsistent. The document calls for stronger EU directives and legislative support to speed up adoption of e-procurement and realize its cost-saving and competitiveness benefits across the EU.
ePractice: eProcurement Workshop 25 May 2011 - Dimitrios Perperidis, EUROPEAN...ePractice.eu
1) The NHS sid4health platform enables suppliers to create online profiles containing pre-qualification information to reduce barriers for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) competing for public sector contracts.
2) Over 500 NHS contracting authorities and 80,000 suppliers have registered with the platform since its launch in 2009. It facilitates sharing of supplier information across NHS authorities.
3) Lessons learned include the importance of joint operational teams to resolve issues, engaging users in design, and maintaining backwards compatibility to reassure existing users. The platform could potentially be expanded across the UK and Europe.
ePractice: eProcurement Workshop 25 May 2011 - Zoran JanevskiePractice.eu
The document discusses a study on user satisfaction of e-procurement systems in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. It finds that while over 75% of registered economic operators report time savings from automated notifications, only around half have actually submitted bids through the system. Users report satisfaction with increased transparency and speed, but less than half find the system easy to use. Most users call for upgrades to stability, accessibility, and training.
ePractice: eProcurement Workshop 25 May 2011 - Lars-Johan FroylandePractice.eu
PEPPOL is an EU-funded project that aims to enable cross-border eProcurement across Europe. It establishes a common infrastructure and set of standards to allow any supplier in the EU to communicate electronically with any European contracting authority for procurement processes. The project is coordinated by the Norwegian Agency for Public Management and involves 18 beneficiaries from 12 countries. It has connected existing national eProcurement systems through access points to create an interoperable network for exchanging documents like eCatalogues, eOrders, and eInvoices across borders.
ePractice: eProcurement Workshop 25 May 2011 - João Frade-Rodrigues ePractice.eu
The European Commission has been switching to e-Procurement since 2007. The presentation discusses the e-PRIOR solution, which provides an e-Procurement platform for the European Commission. e-PRIOR allows for electronic ordering, invoicing, catalogues and more. It provides benefits like faster processing, increased transparency, and significant cost reductions compared to paper processes. The e-PRIOR solution is fully operational and ready for other public administrations to implement.
The Role of White Label Bookkeeping Services in Supporting the Growth and Sca...YourLegal Accounting
Effective financial management is important for expansion and scalability in the ever-changing US business environment. White Label Bookkeeping services is an innovative solution that is becoming more and more popular among businesses. These services provide a special method for managing financial duties effectively, freeing up companies to concentrate on their main operations and growth plans. We’ll look at how White Label Bookkeeping can help US firms expand and develop in this blog.
The Steadfast and Reliable Bull: Taurus Zodiac Signmy Pandit
Explore the steadfast and reliable nature of the Taurus Zodiac Sign. Discover the personality traits, key dates, and horoscope insights that define the determined and practical Taurus, and learn how their grounded nature makes them the anchor of the zodiac.
Prescriptive analytics BA4206 Anna University PPTFreelance
Business analysis - Prescriptive analytics Introduction to Prescriptive analytics
Prescriptive Modeling
Non Linear Optimization
Demonstrating Business Performance Improvement
SATTA MATKA DPBOSS KALYAN MATKA RESULTS KALYAN CHART KALYAN MATKA MATKA RESULT KALYAN MATKA TIPS SATTA MATKA MATKA COM MATKA PANA JODI TODAY BATTA SATKA MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER MATKA RESULTS MATKA CHART MATKA JODI SATTA COM INDIA SATTA MATKA MATKA TIPS MATKA WAPKA ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE MATKA RESULT KALYAN MATKA RESULT DPBOSS MATKA 143 MAIN MATKA KALYAN MATKA RESULTS KALYAN CHART INDIA MATKA KALYAN SATTA MATKA 420 INDIAN MATKA SATTA KING MATKA FIX JODI FIX FIX FIX SATTA NAMBAR MATKA INDIA SATTA BATTA
During the budget session of 2024-25, the finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, introduced the “solar Rooftop scheme,” also known as “PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana.” It is a subsidy offered to those who wish to put up solar panels in their homes using domestic power systems. Additionally, adopting photovoltaic technology at home allows you to lower your monthly electricity expenses. Today in this blog we will talk all about what is the PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana. How does it work? Who is eligible for this yojana and all the other things related to this scheme?
Unlocking WhatsApp Marketing with HubSpot: Integrating Messaging into Your Ma...Niswey
50 million companies worldwide leverage WhatsApp as a key marketing channel. You may have considered adding it to your marketing mix, or probably already driving impressive conversions with WhatsApp.
But wait. What happens when you fully integrate your WhatsApp campaigns with HubSpot?
That's exactly what we explored in this session.
We take a look at everything that you need to know in order to deploy effective WhatsApp marketing strategies, and integrate it with your buyer journey in HubSpot. From technical requirements to innovative campaign strategies, to advanced campaign reporting - we discuss all that and more, to leverage WhatsApp for maximum impact. Check out more details about the event here https://events.hubspot.com/events/details/hubspot-new-delhi-presents-unlocking-whatsapp-marketing-with-hubspot-integrating-messaging-into-your-marketing-strategy/
Enhancing Adoption of AI in Agri-food: IntroductionCor Verdouw
Introduction to the Panel on: Pathways and Challenges: AI-Driven Technology in Agri-Food, AI4Food, University of Guelph
“Enhancing Adoption of AI in Agri-food: a Path Forward”, 18 June 2024
Ellen Burstyn: From Detroit Dreamer to Hollywood Legend | CIO Women MagazineCIOWomenMagazine
In this article, we will dive into the extraordinary life of Ellen Burstyn, where the curtains rise on a story that's far more attractive than any script.
SATTA MATKA DPBOSS KALYAN MATKA RESULTS KALYAN CHART KALYAN MATKA MATKA RESULT KALYAN MATKA TIPS SATTA MATKA MATKA COM MATKA PANA JODI TODAY BATTA SATKA MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER MATKA RESULTS MATKA CHART MATKA JODI SATTA COM INDIA SATTA MATKA MATKA TIPS MATKA WAPKA ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE MATKA RESULT KALYAN MATKA RESULT DPBOSS MATKA 143 MAIN MATKA KALYAN MATKA RESULTS KALYAN CHART
The Most Inspiring Entrepreneurs to Follow in 2024.pdfthesiliconleaders
In a world where the potential of youth innovation remains vastly untouched, there emerges a guiding light in the form of Norm Goldstein, the Founder and CEO of EduNetwork Partners. His dedication to this cause has earned him recognition as a Congressional Leadership Award recipient.
Tired of chasing down expiring contracts and drowning in paperwork? Mastering contract management can significantly enhance your business efficiency and productivity. This guide unveils expert secrets to streamline your contract management process. Learn how to save time, minimize risk, and achieve effortless contract management.
SATTA MATKA DPBOSS KALYAN MATKA RESULTS KALYAN CHART KALYAN MATKA MATKA RESULT KALYAN MATKA TIPS SATTA MATKA MATKA COM MATKA PANA JODI TODAY BATTA SATKA MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER MATKA RESULTS MATKA CHART MATKA JODI SATTA COM INDIA SATTA MATKA MATKA TIPS MATKA WAPKA ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE MATKA RESULT KALYAN MATKA RESULT DPBOSS MATKA 143 MAIN MATKA KALYAN MATKA RESULTS KALYAN CHART
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Contextualising Public (e)Participation in the Governance of the European Union
1. Contextualising Public (e)Participation in the Governance of
the European Union
This paper contextualises the benefits and challenges
of participation and eParticipation in the EU in two
respects: historically, by reviewing the last decade of Simon Smith
legislative and policy initiatives relevant to public
Centre for
participation in European policy-making; and
Digital
theoretically, by defining the governance regime which Citizenship, Institute of
operates in the EU and, taking into account the Communications Studies,
governance 'reform programme' which EU institutions University of Leeds
have also laid out, theorising the scope for public
participation in this political context. While noting a
certain gap or lag between rhetoric and reality, such
Efpraxia
that participation opportunities remain biased in
Dalakiouridou
practice towards structured events, a number of risks
DESS,
are identified in the apparent future strategy of
University of Macedonia
'listening better' by diffusing participation beyond the
'strong publics' which have hitherto dominated
participative policy-making in Europe. Keywords
participation, (network)
These risks are referred to as the 'low benefit – high governance, democratic
cost' scenario, the 'pathologies of learning', the 'tyranny deficit, Plan D, European
Public Sphere, enclaves
of light', and the difficulty of targeting marginalised
groups, with the need to protect and yet connect
'enclaves' in the European public sphere.
The pursuit of
The underlying challenge for a network governance governmental
regime like the EU is how to maintain a productive objectives involves attempts
to mobilise the self-governing
tension between system-oriented and actor-driven
capacities of individuals,
participation. eParticipation tools may prove useful in
groups and communities,
this balancing act. such that 'active citizenship'
is normalised as a
responsibility as well
as a right.
European Journal of ePractice · www.epracticejournal.eu 1
Nº 7 · March 2009 · ISSN: 1988-625X
2. 1 Introduction
Participation has become something of a mantra in late modern societies. As commonly used by policy-makers,
it also goes by a number of near synonyms such as engagement, involvement and empowerment, any of which
may be prefaced by an adjective like public or community. Typically, the benefits claimed for participation relate
to service effectiveness and efficiency (e.g. more detailed knowledge of the public’s needs and wants for
service planning), decision-making quality and legitimacy (e.g. generating awareness, acceptance and
commitment to policies), or active citizenship (e.g. generating social capital and mobilising people’s voluntary
labour, including their intellectual labour for problem-solving purposes). Participation using information and
communication technologies (ICT) – eParticipation – may bring three additional types of benefit: reduced
transaction and coordination costs in social and political relationships, greater deliberativeness due to certain
qualities of the medium, and the enhanced information-processing capacity of information technology.
This paper argues that participation is ‘asked’ to perform different functions according to the governance
context in which it occurs. Ultimately, the benefits of participation can be understood in terms of how its effects
change, stabilise or improve a certain governance regime. Having traced the recent history of legislation and
policy on citizens’ participation in the European Union, we attempt to define the governance regime that
prevails at the level of the EU, arguing that a network mode of governance provides a reasonable first
approximation, and finally we deduce some implications about the role of participation and eParticipation as a
governance tool for Europe.
2 Governance
Governance is usually defined in relation to government. Both are about securing “the conditions for ordered
rule and collective action” (Stoker, 1998: 17). However, the growth in popularity of the term governance reflects
a sense that contemporary transformations (fragmentations) of the state, markets and society have changed
the nature of many governing processes, blurring the boundaries between and within public, private and non-
governmental/non-profit sectors and necessitating the formation of more or less diffuse coalitions and
partnerships in order to govern, where previously this was achieved through the directive power of central
authorities. This gives us a definition that, in one crucial respect, is in conflict with government, since
“democratic government presumes exactly what democratic governance does its utmost to erode, namely a
clear distinction between system and life world” (Bang, 2003: 242). Nevertheless this paper retains a somewhat
state-centric definition of governance because even if many of the tasks of governing are devolved to non-state
actors, the state provides a sense of direction to societal processes. These are defined by strategies (i.e.
“asymmetrical privileging of some outcomes over others” (Jessop, 2003: 108)), and refer to public values
which, when fixed in space-time, have the status of 'official norms' within an always temporary but often quite
stable state-society settlement, providing some sense of 'steer' to lower-order societal processes, including
participation.
3 Participation
Participation, as defined here, relates mainly to inputs to policy- and decision-making for political or public
policy purposes, both within formal systems but also through informal systems where these can have a real
impact at any stage of the policy lifecycle. Participation will have direct impacts on, and relations to, public
policy goals and values like democracy, but it is not understood only in the context of democracy or any other
public value. Participation can lead to benefits which take the form of either public or private goods: often the
intrinsic benefits are appropriated privately (by participants), whereas the instrumental benefits may be
appropriated publicly. In addition to these criteria, this paper is concerned with participation at the European
scale.
Participation is a defining characteristic of democracy, but two caveats should be added. Firstly, the reverse
does not hold true: there is nothing intrinsically democratic about participation or about regimes that promote it
as a governance tool. Authoritarian regimes have often been characterised by extremely high levels of
participation of one form or another. Public service organisations such as health authorities or social housing
providers at the local level, or autonomous regulatory agencies at the EU level, which govern (or co-govern) a
specific policy domain, may make use of participatory methods to do so even though they are not democratic
bodies in terms of their structures and procedures. Secondly, participation does not lead deterministically to any
particular type of democracy, such as direct democracy (with which it is frequently equated). It is just as
conceivable, and empirically demonstrable, that participatory methods can bolster representative democracy
and undermine direct democracy. In France, for example, Premat (2006, 2008) has shown that some mayors
use participatory methods such as online discussion forums to position themselves at critical nodes for the
European Journal of ePractice · www.epracticejournal.eu 2
Nº 7 · March 2009 · ISSN: 1988-625X
3. translation of citizens’ demands to the policy-making process and for reconnaissance work among constituents,
thus channelling grassroots participatory energy into the formal representative system and obviating the need
for more direct forms of democracy.
4 Why do contemporary governance regimes aspire to become
participative?
Logically, there are many circumstances in which non-participatory decision-making is legitimate and effective.
Participation activities then become ‘low-benefit’ and ‘high-cost’ interventions (Irvin & Stansbury, 2004). In the
situation described by these authors participation was perceived as unnecessary by the population concerned
for a relatively simple policy process (flood management in a small valley), but for more complex issues there is
a feeling that increased participation can be one part of a response to the limitations on the state's capacity to
direct society and redistribute resources to the same extent that was the norm in the 20th century (in both
'halves' of Europe). 21st century states are attempting instead to ‘enable’ society to regulate itself and to
‘coordinate’ a new division of labour between partners from all three sectors in order to achieve collective goals
and create public goods and values. They arguably find themselves confronting indeterminate issues and risks
requiring exploratory solutions, in an age of unclear rules, unintended consequences and uncertain pay-offs
(Jessop, 2003; Peters, 2006).
For these reasons, participation is increasingly demanded of us by modern states. The pursuit of governmental
objectives involves attempts to mobilise the self-governing capacities of individuals, groups and communities,
such that 'active citizenship' is normalised as a responsibility as well as a right. Thus it has been argued that
'advanced liberal government' reserves a major role for the 'technologies of agency' (Dean, 1999: 167-8).
Participation has become a moralising discourse (responsible citizens should be active in managing their own
risks, and those who cannot need to be empowered to do so), a functional requirement of the post-welfare state
(necessary to tap localised knowledge because needs assessment is increasingly undertaken not by
bureaucrats but by service users themselves), and a normative discourse (a means to overcome a perceived
division between governors and governed in representative regimes (Jessop, 2003: 104)). Empowering people
to co-govern and self-govern has become a key governance strategy because “unless they are prepared to
assume responsibility for and participate actively in solving their own everyday problems, the system stands
little chance of being able to connect with them and deliver them the welfare goods they demand” (Bang, 2003:
243).
There is a potential tension between system-oriented participation (what we might call co-governance) and self-
governance as the practice of political freedoms on an actor's own terms. Bang’s concept of culture governance
implies that to utilise people’s self-governing capacities to the full extent, rulers must “pay heed to the
irreducibility of the 'small tactics' of lay people in the political community for making a difference” (Bang, 2003:
248) and link this popular creativity to goal-setting, if only indirectly. This means guaranteeing a space for
participation within what Goffman would call back regions of the social system. Participation, as a specific form
of social integration, can be thought of as 'regionalised' according to the locales in which it takes place. Each
locale acts as a power container, and there exists a hierarchy of locales, through which social and system
integration are articulated across time-space (Giddens, 1984). Back regions – essentially locales which are
distant from power centres – resemble Habermas’ literary public sphere in the sense of being insulated from
1
dominant power relations, both governmental and commercial (Habermas, 1989). Here, participation may be
driven by a search for cognitive reassurance rather than the pursuit of interests.
5 The EU's 'democratic deficit'
The term democratic deficit has emerged in connection with the EU, above all to indicate the opaqueness of
decision-making (Lebessis & Paterson, 1999). According to the Europa website 2 , “The democratic deficit is a
concept invoked principally in the argument that the European Union and its various bodies suffer from a lack of
democracy and seem inaccessible to the ordinary citizen because their method of operating is so complex.”
Considerable effort has therefore been invested to create processes of transparency and accountability with
regard to the exercise of public power in the EU and its legitimacy. Accountability is considered a source of
1 Discursive practice in the literary public sphere is insulated from determination by power relations, which is not the
same as saying that the two are completely unconnected: the public sphere, as a component of civil society, is always in a
fundamental sense in opposition to the power of the state.
2 http://europa.eu/scadplus/glossary/democratic_deficit_en.htm
European Journal of ePractice · www.epracticejournal.eu 3
Nº 7 · March 2009 · ISSN: 1988-625X
4. legitimacy which the EU institutions are highly dependent on. Transparency is perceived as a necessary
condition for democracy, as it ensures that citizens obtain all the information they need to call public authorities
to account. Legitimacy demonstrates the capacity of European institutions to provide a system of good
governance and fulfil their functions in an impartial manner. Citizens and other actors reflexively assess both
the processes and the outputs of governance in terms of their legitimacy. Yet the relationship between these
variables is quite complex (see Tsoukas 1997, Diamandouros, 2006, Lebessis and Paterson, 1997). Measures
already taken to promote transparency and accountability by EU institutions might seem to provide citizens with
more opportunities to be informed, but in reality citizens feel scarcely able to shape their future as Europeans,
resulting in largely passive expressions of citizenship (Dalakiouridou, Tambouris & Tarabanis, 2008).
In fact, “the term 'democratic deficit' often masks an unjustified presupposition that the EU should follow similar
democratic practices to those found in national arenas.... [when in fact] a legitimate and democratic Union may
involve innovations for which there are no precedents in national experiences of democratic politics.” (Lord,
2000: 21) These innovations could include forging links between a ‘listening’ Commission and citizens or their
formal and informal advocates. It was in this spirit that the European Constitution was introduced as an
instrument to bolster legitimacy and support for the EU, and it was intended to “politicize and democratize the
EU in a way that encouraged a shared sense of citizen engagement in a common project” (Moravcsik, 2006).
The same author argues, however, that there is no empirical evidence to verify that greater political
participation would result in greater institutional trust and political legitimacy.
As we have already cautioned against the temptation to elide the concepts of participation and democracy,
these limits to expected causalities should not surprise us. This paper is not seeking a solution to the EU's
'democratic deficit', although concern about the latter is clearly an important contextual factor in discussing
participation. Concern with transparency is more directly relevant, since it would seem to constitute a necessary
(but not sufficient) condition for democracy and participation alike. Below we outline how a fuller understanding
of governance in the EU indicates some ways in which participation, combined with a certain level of
transparency, might contribute to regime legitimation. First, however, we trace the recent history of legislation
and policy on citizens’ participation in the European Union.
6 EU legislation and policy on participation and eParticipation
In this section we investigate the legal constituencies embedded in primary and secondary legislation, followed
by a review of policy documents that appear to be relevant to aspects of citizen empowerment. 3 In the
discussion that follows we refer to the institutional milestones concerning citizens' participation, transparency,
openness, accountability and legitimacy.
The EU’s primary legislation appears to address the issue of participation indirectly, as no references are made
to participatory democracy until the Treaty of Lisbon. The Treaty on the European Union, the Treaty of
Amsterdam and the Treaty of Nice anchor representative democracy through political parties and the rights of
European citizens to address petitions to the European Parliament. However, the Treaty of Amsterdam fortifies
the notion of transparency and the basis for consultations. It is clearly stipulated that “The Commission should
consult widely before proposing legislation and, whenever appropriate, publish consultation documents, except
in cases of particular urgency or confidentiality”, and some of the policy documents discussed below formulate
the functional basis for consultations.
It is in 2004, with the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe 4 that the democratic foundations of the EU
are delineated, as the principles of democratic equality, representative democracy and participatory democracy
are included. The Treaty also inaugurates the right of initiative of citizens, according to which a specified
number of citizens can invite the Commission to initiate specific legislation. The Treaty was drafted in an
awkward period where the democratic deficit had become a concern and the response in the Treaty was to
underline that decisions should be taken as openly as possible and as closely as possible to citizens, as an
endeavour to bridge the communicative gap between the institutions and citizens. Nonetheless, citizen
participation is still captured on a representative level, as each citizen is heard through political parties.
3 The second and third pillar of the European Union are ignored, as well as other sources of EU law, such as
agreements or negotiations with third parties or other preparatory acts. The primary tool of research is EUROLEX which
enabled access to legal documents.
4 We note that the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe was rejected and the Treaty of Lisbon has not been
ratified as of January 2009, but we treat these documents as public statements of the values endorsed by a consensus-
building process within the EU institutions. Indeed the use of a Convention to draft the former makes it a good example of
the outputs of deliberation in strong publics.
European Journal of ePractice · www.epracticejournal.eu 4
Nº 7 · March 2009 · ISSN: 1988-625X
5. Finally, the Treaty of Lisbon confirms democratic equality, as all citizens are given equal attention from the
Union, representative democracy through enhanced rights for national parliaments, and participatory
democracy based on the citizens’ initiative and enhanced interaction with the institutions. No specific or
extended references are made to the realisation of participatory democracy on a practical level.
Secondary legislation does not incorporate nor institutionalise the notion of citizens’ participation,
notwithstanding stand alone decisions which reaffirm the right of access to documents. Another partial
exception was the 'Europe for citizens' programme decision which envisages the strengthening of European
citizenship, enabling citizens to partake in the construction of Europe.
Although the Treaties provide the legal basis for citizen engagement and the status of democracy, other policy
documents specify and provide the overall framework for achieving the general objectives of the Treaties. The
institutional arrangements embodied in the documents analysed below have a particular bearing on
accountability, good governance, transparency and legitimacy. Citizens’ participation, however, only became
evident after 2001, and eParticipation was explicitly mentioned in 2007 as the Commission began to realize the
participatory potential of ICT. (Dalakiouridou, Tambouris & Tarabanis, 2008)
Until 2000, the predominant view of democracy was implicitly connected to public access to documents which
in turn makes the legislative procedure and the institutions responsible for the legislation more accountable and
transparent. The first signs of ICT used to foster accountability are expressed in the White Paper on reforming
the Commission, in 2000. Further, the Commission, in the Communication on a new framework for co-operation
on activities concerning the information and communication policy of the EU in 2001 acknowledges the
necessity for Europe to be closer to citizens and overcome barriers related to the general communication
strategy of the Commission. The Europa portal and the Europe Direct service are also mentioned as a means
to achieve a higher level of communication and enhance citizens' rights to information.
Principles of good governance were formulated to address the perceived mistrust of European citizens in the
European edifice. The White Paper on European Governance acknowledges the need for greater citizen
5
involvement and openness, and sets out the minimum standards for consultations on EU policies, while
national governments remain responsible for nurturing a culture of debate and dialogue as well as improving
their own national consultative processes. EU-wide consultations remain limited on the Europa portal while
policy formulation is not yet a multi-level partnership. In parallel, the European Commission’s Interactive Policy
Making online tool emerged, first as a means to analyse the reaction of citizens and enterprises, evaluate
existing policies and unite interest groups under a single online panel. Later, however, it was extended to
impact assessment and then became the focal point of inclusive consultations at an EU level through the
Debate Europe portal.
2005 marked a significant change in communication policies, when the Commission set out the aspiration to
effectively communicate EU policies and activities and better connect to citizens. The Action plan to improve
Communicating Europe explicitly adopts a 'listening' attitude by pursuing feedback from consultations and other
sources. The Commission had been urged for some time to enrich channels of representation and reform its
communication strategy to create openness at all stages of policy making (Lebessis & Paterson, 1999). The
Action plan focuses on publicity facilities as well as improvements to the Europa portal to support wider
communication.
Citizen empowerment remains visible only at a conceptual level until 2005, which coincides with the negative
referenda on the proposed constitution and the subsequent 'period of reflection' due to the constitutional crisis.
Calling for democratic 'renewal', the Commission then adopted Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate
which encompasses a variety of tools to make citizens heard, stimulate debate and generate dialogue on
European issues. The majority of actions are clearly orientated around a 'going local' strategy, i.e. relying on
member states and local authorities to capture citizens’ apprehensions (this was seen as its most successful
component), but there are also measures to maximize the impact of consultations and develop a new website
devoted to debates.
Communication channels between institutions and European citizens remain fragmented due to the incapacity
of the EU to base its communication strategy on the existence of a genuine European Public Sphere. The 2005
European Communication policy attempts to stimulate the formation of such a public sphere through
5 Also stipulated in the document 'General principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties' in
2002. The rationale behind the consultation standards is embedded in the Treaties as previously discussed, which however
do not envisage its achievement though ICT.
European Journal of ePractice · www.epracticejournal.eu 5
Nº 7 · March 2009 · ISSN: 1988-625X
6. communications technologies, such as the creation of citizens’ fora, virtual meeting places, audiovisual facilities
and technologically-enhanced channels of communication. From this point in time, the Your Europe website is
consistently promoted as the basic communication vehicle with citizens.
Meanwhile, Plan D was revisited in 2006, refocusing on the following components: local 'European public
spaces', national round-table debates, support for bottom-up civic initiatives that relate to EU policy goals, and
online debate. 6 The Commission has championed citizen consultation and involvement in policy-making, and
the use if ICT to achieve this. However, no specific measures were put into place until recently.
In 2007, the Communicating Europe in Partnership document re-negotiates citizen empowerment and positions
it in a different context. Activities already adopted in the context of Plan D are maintained, but a new Internet
strategy now supports audiovisual networks, and pilot information networks to unite stakeholders and other
communication tools are promoted to support the creation of a European Public Sphere and to centralise the
communication approach, which hitherto relied on local players more than an EU-wide holistic approach. As a
follow up, the 'Communicating about Europe via the Internet - engaging the citizens' document begins to
demarcate an eParticipation approach, as the Commission starts to build upon the potential of ICT to legitimise
the institutions and bridge the gap between the institutions and citizens. The upgrading of the EUROPA portal
as a focal point for information and content creation, the enhancement of online communications activities in
the Commission’s representations and rendering online information easily accessible and broadly
7
comprehensible now complement the existing communications activities.
2008 marks the Commission’s intention to invest in the creation of a public sphere by acknowledging the
contributing role of the media and the creation of pan-european programmes. Audiovisual media were thus
recognised as critically important to citizens' understanding of European politics. Last but not least, Plan D was
reformulated (and renamed Debate Europe after the Commission's dedicated Plan D website) to better listen to
citizens and better explain EU politics. Transparency and access to information is recognised as the first step to
citizen participation, as access to information renders citizens better informed and better equipped to
participate, debate and deliberate on EU issues. Participatory democracy is now approached indirectly at a
local, regional, national and cross-border level through the development of specific Plan D-funded projects. A
clear eParticipation follow up to Plan D is intended to further enable citizens to articulate their wishes to
decision makers by holding direct debates, interactive fora, European public spaces, additional Internet debates
etc.
In summary, from 2000 onwards, the documents adopted by the Commission relate to transparency and
accountability, while from 2002, consultations are given more prominence as a citizen contribution to the policy
making cycle. Some less formal and less static forms of interaction with civil society have been emphasised in
policy documents since 2005, in keeping with the Plan D motto of 'listening better', and ICT is heralded as an
important tool for 'listening' institutions. In fact, the practical efforts made by the Commission appear to
correspond to the working definition of eDemocracy made by the European Parliament, as including all
electronic means of communication that enable and empower citizens in the effort to hold politicians
accountable for their actions in the public realm, thereby increasing the transparency of the political process,
enhancing the direct involvement of citizens and improving the quality of opinion formation by opening new
spaces of information and deliberation (Kies, Mendez & Schmitter, 2003). Citizen participation in the democratic
process is conceptualised around the citizen who is informed and empowered to make his/her voice heard and
participate in consultations or other structured events, rather than active and spontaneous contribution to the
policy making cycle.
7 The EU as a network governance regime and the scope for
participation
Governance regimes are always hybridised, mixing elements of hierarchical, market-based and network modes
of governance. So the governance regime which currently exists within the European Union contains elements
of market-based modes of governance, for example to regulate the ICT sector itself, wherein a combination of
state metagovernance and market coordination is held to be the most transparent solution feasible given the
complex organisation of the sector which transcends national and even European jurisdictions (Felch, 2006).
Elements of hierarchical modes of governance also persist in the European political system, notably concerning
6 Information note from Vice President Wallström to the Commission, Plan D - Wider and deeper Debate on Europe
(2006).
7 For the first time, a clear budget line is given to the Internet toolbox to assist the realisation of Plan D.
European Journal of ePractice · www.epracticejournal.eu 6
Nº 7 · March 2009 · ISSN: 1988-625X
7. the role of the European Parliament, whose powers and popular legitimacy are, however, much lower than
most national parliaments. A strong argument can be made that network governance has always featured
prominently in the coordination of social and economic activity at the level of the EU, both in respect of the
pooling of sovereignty between member states, and more particularly with regard to the involvement of non-
state actors in policy-making, including the establishment of committees (the Economic and Social Committee
and the Committee of the Regions) designed to strengthen the role of civic opinion in decision making 8 . This
structure is essentially corporatist, which Streeck & Schmitter (1991) consider to be a variety of network
arrangements, and one of its most notable features has been what amounts to the chartering by EU institutions
of peak level interest organisations 9 , and the role they have assumed in legitimising EU policy making within a
system of 'bargaining democracy' and dispersed power. This nurtured an intensive, if not very extensive form of
participative policy-making, revolving around 'strong publics' (Eriksen & Fossum, 2002).
A leitmotif of the discussions around the preparation and consultation of the White Paper on European
Governance was the idea that the European Union was not yet networked enough in the light of changing
conditions and fresh challenges, notably enlargement, and a general aspiration was expressed to reach out to
citizens. It nevertheless remains the case that organised civil society is given a pivotal intermediary role, such
that, for example, the transnational discussion processes that took place under Plan D from 2005 to 2007 as
well as the recently-launched European Citizens' Consultations project have been managed by civil society
organisations, enabling the Commission to speak of “consultations held by civil society” as one of its new
governance tools (COM(2008)158/4).
It is important to note that what is being delegated through most of the EC's policy networks is problem-solving
capacity rather than decision-making authority 10 (Eriksen & Fossum, 2002: 409). Hitherto this delegation has
been to strong publics such as committees, consultative fora and, since 1999, specially-chartered conventions.
Latterly the attempt has been to diffuse problem-solving capacity within the general public sphere. If this is the
case, there are twin risks in such a strategy. The first one is the ‘low benefit – high cost’ scenario: does the
governance process require a high level of participation for effective functioning, and is there a social demand
for it? Capturing the attention of an audience (a prerequisite for any participatory process) is more complicated
than merely staging a performance (Curtin, 2007). Given a lack of popular enthusiasm for 'European' affairs
and the EU project, there is a risk of misinterpreting citizens' motivations to participate by failing to make
sufficiently clear links between the European problems citizens are being asked to help solve and the everyday
problems of the lifeworld which are likely to preoccupy them most of the time. The re-scoping of the Debate
Europe website to allow citizens more choice about the subjects for debate could be interpreted as a positive
development in this light, since it promises to increase network governance capacity by relaxing central control
over the participation process. The corollary, however, is an increased potential for conflict within networks
about the rules as well as the outcomes of cooperation (Davies, 2005).
The second risk is what Eder (2007) calls the pathology of learning. If we assume that a relatively high level of
participation is desirable within network modes of governance, then this is so to the extent that they facilitate
collective learning. That is what networks are good at. But by the same token they are vulnerable to failure if an
imbalance develops between participation and deliberation. Eder cites the fascist state as an extreme example
of the expansion of participation at the expense of deliberation (one person deliberates and the entire society
participates in ‘living out’ the leader’s wise policies). The reverse situation – too much deliberation with too little
participation – is also a pathology of learning, since it will likewise reduce the problem-solving capacity of
networks. Lieber raises this concern in relation to the European Parliament: it will only be successful in taking
on the role of a hub in the public sphere, which it has recently begun to stake out, on the condition that MEPs
and citizens learn “to learn mutually from each other” (Lieber, 2007: 277).
8 The European Economic and Social Committee has existed since the Treaty of Rome. It is the institutionalised
representative of organised civil society, whose representatives (nominated by member states for their experience and
knowledge) form opinions on Community policy proposals and other aspects of European integration via a deliberative
process. The Committee of the Regions, established by the Treaty of Maastricht, is the political assembly that provides local
and regional authorities with an input, via consultation, whenever new proposals are made in areas that have repercussions
at regional or local level.
9 And more recently also 'political foundations' affiliated to European political parties under regulation (EC) No.
1524/2007, which have an awareness-raising and 'citizen training' brief.
10 This is in keeping with a network governance approach, in which knowledge production and circulation assumes a
more prominent place in the repertoire of governing than the actual taking and implementing of collective decisions and
choices (Pinson, 2003).
European Journal of ePractice · www.epracticejournal.eu 7
Nº 7 · March 2009 · ISSN: 1988-625X
8. Similar tensions exists around transparency, which is a prerequisite for participation, but not in the sense that
'maximum transparency produces maximum participation'. The logic of the EC's transparency initiative (which
in practice involves publishing details of policy processes online and codifying the terms of participation in its
policy networks) is to expose strong publics to the gaze of the general public. One difficulty here occurs due to
the irreducibility of many types of knowledge to the types of objectified information (such as indicators, targets
and benchmarks) which authorities tend to emit in the name of greater transparency. This can lead to a 'tyranny
of light' under which the real needs of citizens are obscured by decontextualised, quantifiable indicators of
societal 'need' (Tsoukas, 1997).
Another difficulty in making governance processes more transparent is identifying, addressing and mobilising
some of the stakeholders who ‘need’ to participate in the more complex division of labour of a network mode of
governance, but may not themselves realise that they ‘need’ to do so. The current phase of Debate Europe
stresses the importance of targeting women and young people, groups which were under-represented in the
pilot phase (though it provides little guidance about how to do so). Yet participation by some excluded social
groups may actually be less likely in a more transparent environment and more likely in enclaves that are not
exposed to publicity. Moreover, given that much public debate on Europe is inevitably filtered through national
media and framed with reference to ‘national interests’, whereas there are well-founded doubts about the level
of public interest in affairs which are constructed as ‘European’, it is important to consider ways of improving
the quality of deliberation on Europe within national 'enclaves'. eParticipation is demonstrably good at
facilitating enclave deliberation, which is usually interpreted as an anti-deliberative feature of the Internet
(Wilhelm, 2000: 13) but can be a positive factor for democracy under some conditions, especially with a view to
11
social inclusion.
8 Conclusion
In any hybridised governance regime there will be a need for different modes of participation and eParticipation
in different spheres of activity or policy areas. Market-based modes of participation (the citizen acting as a
'consumer' or service user, exercising choice between predefined options) are relevant for mobilising and
aggregating opinion among the diffuse general public beyond the Brussels-centric policy networks, whereas
hierarchical modes of participation (the citizen as elector/constituent) could strengthen democratic
accountability – the EU's achilles heel – by promoting forms of participation (i.e. vertical interaction) that link
parliamentarians to their constituents and accentuate the former's intermediary role.
But insofar as network governance features prominently in the EU governance regime, this characterisation
also disguises a need for varied modes and locales of participation. Organised groups still dominate the
significant policy networks within the EU, but their role has become wider and more flexible. They play the
multiple roles of supplier of expert knowledge, unofficial opposition in a consensus-based political system,
agent of popular legitimacy and source of demands for more participation. Referring to the role of civil society
organisations in the Plan D process, the Commission calls them multipliers and disseminators “through their
political and media networks” (COM(2008)158/4). It is notable, however, that European institutions do not yet
make much use of, and have not really developed policies about how to link to participation and eParticipation
processes hosted by third parties such as media organisations (where considerable public debate about
European affairs goes on). Thus there remains a tension between the chartering or co-opting of networks by
European institutions and a more bottom-up form of networking that starts from and works with the associations
of citizens as they emerge and re-group spontaneously.
Furthermore, since open and inclusive networks tend to generate conflict, governments are often confronted
with the choice of either reimposing hierarchical means of securing compliance with 'system-oriented' goals
(which may well undermine trust and therefore subdue participation itself), or not intervening and therefore
having to deal with networks which may either pursue goals that conflict with government strategies, or self-
destruct due to indivisible conflicts between stakeholders (Davies 2005). European institutions do not,
apparently, have the same power to intervene as national governments, but they do choose both the terms of
debate for the participation processes they initiate, and which other networks (whose networks) to partner with.
11 The European Citizens' Consultation portal (www.european-citizens-consultations.eu) is structured according to the
principle that debate is best fostered within national 'enclaves' to start with, followed by the subsequent integration of
proposals at a face-to-face European Citizens' Summit in Brussels, before the final set of recommendations for policy-
makers is subjected to further discussion, again within national online 'public spheres'. This tiered model may conceivably
facilitate wider participation.
European Journal of ePractice · www.epracticejournal.eu 8
Nº 7 · March 2009 · ISSN: 1988-625X
9. A “dialectical relationship between network and hierarchy” (Davies, 2005: 342) will always underlie these
choices, necessitating a compromise between conflicting benefits of participation.
Our analysis of recent EU policy documents suggests that participation is conceived rather one-dimensionally,
based on a particular construction of the citizen, and it lacks an appreciation of the complex spatial and
temporal 'regionalisation' of participation as actually practised in European societies. We therefore argue that
one of the main challenges for the future lies in ensuring a sufficient diversity of learning environments
connected to European policy-making. It is less a question of raising the overall level of participation than of
securing the existence of channels for different modes of participation which could complement one another. A
key priority should be to create and safeguard a public sphere composed of enclaves in which different kinds of
collective learning and problem-solving can thrive (with different access rights and different ways of establishing
legitimacy and representativeness). This can be justified from both a bottom-up (actor-oriented) and a top-down
(system-oriented) perspective. In the first respect, such a public sphere would allow space for types of
participation that actors themselves choose in order to realise autonomous goals oriented towards achieving
cognitive reassurance (Pinson, 2003) or 'everyday making' (Bang, 2003). This is crucial for motivating people to
participate. The Commission partially recognises this in framing Debate Europe as a way of “chang[ing] the
perception that EU matters are too abstract and disconnected from the national public sphere to be of interest
to citizens” (COM(2008)158/4), although the same should apply for other enclaves based around non-national
identities. From a top-down perspective, a European public sphere composed of diverse enclaves of
participation carries the risk of group polarisation, but this is arguably outweighed by its importance as a means
of preserving a repertoire of alternative development paths essential for the long-term ability of social systems
to adapt to changing circumstances. eParticipation may be one route towards making more effective links
between enclaves. More generally eParticipation tools can bridge between actor-driven and system-oriented
12
modes of participation (as demonstrated empirically by Monnoyer-Smith, 2006 ). In doing so – by providing a
flexible, multi-channel menu of participation options, including those that emerge in the back regions of the
European public sphere – it could allay some of the risks connected to a strategy of participatory governance
which were highlighted above.
References
Bang, H. (2003). A new ruler meeting a new citizen: culture governance and everyday making. In Bang, H. (ed.)
Governance as social and political communication, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 241-66.
Curtin, D. (2007). Transparency, audiences and the evolving role of the EU Council of Ministers. In Fossum, J. &
Schlesinger, P. (Eds.) The European Union and the public sphere: a communicative space in the making? London:
Routledge, 246-58.
Dalakiouridou, E. Tambouris, E. & Tarabanis, K. (2008). eParticipation in the European Institutions: an overview.
Proceedings of the Eastern European eGovernment Days, Prague, April 2008.
Davies, J. (2005). Local governance and the dialectics of hierarchy, market and network. Policy Studies, 26 (3/4),
311-35.
Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality. Power and Rule in Modern Society, London: Sage.
Diamandouros, P.N. (2006). Lecture by the European Ombudsman, Professor P. Nikiforos Diamandouros, at the
School of Advanced International Studies of the Johns Hopkins University, Bologna, Italy, 17 October 2006.
Eder, K. (2007). The public sphere and European democracy. Mechanisms of democratisation in the transnational
situation. In Fossum, J. & Schlesinger, P. (Eds.) The European Union and the public sphere: a communicative space
in the making? London: Routledge, 44-64.
Eriksen, E. & Fossum, J. (2002). Democracy through Strong Publics in the European Union. Journal of Common
Market Studies, 40 (3), 401-24.
Falch, M. (2006). ICT and the future conditions for democratic governance. Telematics and Informatics, 23, 134-156
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois
Society, Cambridge: Polity.
12 In the case of a public consultation around the choice of site for a third airport for Paris, an online forum proved to be
a very effective tool for ordinary citizens to regain some control of the debate (which also helped to widen participation)
because it enabled participants to revisit fundamental issues about transport and the environment which had been 'scoped'
out of the heavily-orchestrated offline events. Certain technological and cultural affordances of the online environment
quot;favour a redefinition of the subjects [of debate] that actors find pertinentquot; (Monnoyer-Smith, 2006).
European Journal of ePractice · www.epracticejournal.eu 9
Nº 7 · March 2009 · ISSN: 1988-625X
10. Irvin, R. & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration
Review, 64 (1), 55-65.
Kies, R., Mendez, F. & Schmitter, P. (2003). Evaluation of the use of new technologies in order to facilitate
democracy in Europe. European Parliament: Scientific and Technological Options Assessment Series, STOA 116.
Jessop, B. (2003). Governance and meta-governance: on reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. In Bang, H.
(ed.) Governance as social and political communication, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 101-16.
Lebessis, N & Paterson, J. (1997). Evolution in Governance. What lessons for the Commission, a first assessment.
European Commission: Forward Studies Unit.
Lebessis, N & Paterson, J. (1999). Improving the Effectiveness and Legitimacy of EU Governance, A possible reform
agenda for the Commission. European Commission: Forward Studies Unit.
Liebert, U. (2007). Transnationalising the public sphere? The European Parliament, promises and anticipations. In
Fossum, J. & Schlesinger, P. (eds.) The European Union and the public sphere: a communicative space in the
making? London: Routledge, 259-78.
Lord, C. (2000). Legitimacy, Democracy and the European Union: when abstract questions become practical policy
problems. Policy Paper 03/00, University of Leeds: Department of Politics.
Monnoyer-Smith, L. (2006). Etre créatif sous la contrainte. Une analyse des formes nouvelles de la délibération
publique. Le cas DUCSAI. Politix, 75, 75-101.
Moravscik, A. (2006). What can we learn from the collapse of the European Constitutional Project. Politische
Vierteljahresschrift, 47 (2), 219 241 (part of a forum with Fritz Scharpf, Michael Zuern, Wolfgang Wessels and
Anderas Maurer).
Peters, B. (2006). Forms of Informality: Identifying Informal Governance in the European Union. Perspectives on
European Politics and Society, 7 (1), 25-40.
Pinson, G. (2003). Le chantier de recherche de la gouvernance urbaine et la question de la production des savoirs
dans et pour l'action. Lien social et Politiques, 50, 39-55.
Premat, C. (2006). À la recherche d’une communauté perdue: les usages de la proximité dans le discours participatif
en France. Argumentum, 5, 59-78.
Premat, C. (2008). L’usage des nouvelles technologies par les maires français. COMMposite, 11 (1), 64-86.
Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50 (155), 17 –28.
Streeck, W. & Schmitter, P. (1991). Community, market, state – and associations? The prospective contribution of
interest governance to social order. In Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levačic, R. & Mitchell, J. (Eds.) Markets,
Hierarchies & Networks: the coordination of social life, London: Sage, 227-42.
Tsoukas, H. (1997). The tyranny of light. The temptations and the paradoxes of the information society. Futures, 29
(9), 827-43.
Wilhelm, A. (2000). Democracy in the Digital Age: challenges to political life in cyberspace, London: Routledge.
European official documents consulted
Primary legislation
Articles 138a and 138d of the Treaty of the European Union Official Journal C 224 of 31 August 1992.
Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities,
Official Journal C 340 of 10 November 1997.
Treaty of Nice, amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and
certain related acts, Official Journal C 80 of 10 March 2001.
Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, Official Journal C 310 of 16 December 2004.
Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Official Journal C 306 of 17 December 2007.
Secondary legislation
Resolution of the Council and the Ministers of Youth meeting within the Council of 8 February 1999 on youth
participation Official Journal C 042 , 17/02/1999 P. 0001 - 0002
2006/957/EC: Council Decision of 18 December 2006 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of
an amendment to the Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to
justice in environmental matters
Decision no 1904/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 establishing for the
period 2007-2013 the programme “Europe for Citizens” to promote active European citizenship, OJC L 378/32,
Brussels, 27.12.2006
Policy documents
European Journal of ePractice · www.epracticejournal.eu 10
Nº 7 · March 2009 · ISSN: 1988-625X
11. European Commission: Reforming the Commission, A White Paper – Part II, COM(2000) 200, Brussels, 1.3.2000.
European Commission: A new framework for co-operation on activities concerning the information and
communication policy of the European Union, COM (2001)354, Brussels, 27.6.2001.
European Commission: European Governance, a White Paper, COM (2001)428, Brussels, 25.7.2001.
European Commission: General principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties by the
Commission, COM(2002)704.
European Commission: Communication from the Commission on impact assessement, COM(2002)276, Brussels,
5.6.2002.
Action plan to improve communicating Europe by the Commission (2005), available at
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/communication/pdf/communication_com_en.pdf
European Commission: The Commission’s contribution to the period of reflection and beyond: Plan-D for Democracy,
Dialogue and Debate, COM(2005) 494, Brussels, 13.10.2005.
European Commission: White Paper on a European Communication Policy, COM(2006) 35, Brussels, 1.2.2006.
Eurobarometer: EU Communication and the citizens, September/October 2006, available at
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_189b_en.pdf and http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_189a_en.pdf
European Parliament: Report on the White Paper on a European Communication policy, A6-0365/2006, Brussels,
16.10.2006.
European Commission: i2010 eGovernment Action Plan: Accelerating eGovernment in Europe for the Benefit of All,
COM(2006)173, Brussels, 25.4.2006.
European Commission: European Transparency Initiative Green Paper, COM(2006) 194, Brussels, 3.5.2006.
Information note from Vice President Wallström to the Commission, Plan D - Wider and deeper Debate on Europe,
SEC(2006)1553, Brussels, 24.11.2006.
European Commission: Communicating Europe in Partnership, COM(2007) 568, Brussels, 3.10.2007.
European Commission: Communicating about Europe via the Internet, engaging the citizens, SEC(2007)1742,
Brussels, 21.12.2007.
European Commission: Communicating Europe through audiovisual media, SEC(2008) 506/2, Brussels, 24.4.2008.
European Commission: Debate Europe – building on the experience of Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate,
COM(2008)158/4, Brussels, undated.
Authors
Simon Smith
Research Associate
Centre for Digital Citizenship, Institute of Communications Studies, University of Leeds
S.O.Smith@leeds.ac.uk
http://www.epractice.eu/people/13552
Efpraxia Dalakiouridou
Researcher
DESS, University of Macedonia
http://www.epractice.eu/people/12218
The European Journal of ePractice is a digital publication on eTransformation by ePractice.eu, a portal created by the
European Commission to promote the sharing of good practices in eGovernment, eHealth and eInclusion.
Edited by P.A.U. Education, S.L.
Web: www.epracticejournal.eu
Email: editorial@epractice.eu
The texts published in this journal, unless otherwise indicated, are subject to a Creative Commons
Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivativeWorks 2.5 licence. They may be copied, distributed and broadcast provided that the
author and the e-journal that publishes them, European Journal of ePractice, are cited. Commercial use and derivative
works are not permitted. The full licence can be consulted on
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/
European Journal of ePractice · www.epracticejournal.eu 11
Nº 7 · March 2009 · ISSN: 1988-625X