This document provides an overview of 40Ar/39Ar geochronology methods, challenges, and applications. It discusses:
- Justifications for using 40Ar/39Ar to date mafic igneous rocks given suitable minerals and sample size requirements.
- Methodological approaches including sample preparation, irradiation, mass spectrometry, and testing results using standards.
- Difficulties posed by alteration and approaches to overcome them such as comparing untreated and acid-treated aliquots.
- Successful studies dating mafic magmatism in Australia, Brazil, and altered volcanic rocks both onshore and offshore.
- Current projects and developments including improving dating of hydrothermally altered samples.
1. 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of mafic
magmatism: problems, solutions,
and applications
Paulo M. Vasconcelos – The University of Queensland
paulo@earth.uq.edu.au
Isabela O. Carmo – Petrobras S.A.
icarmo@petrobras.com.br
Contributions: David Thiede,Allan Gomes, Karine Carvas, Tracey Crossingham,
Ben Cohen, Kurt Knesel, Zorano Souza, Umberto Cordani, Leila Marques, Emanuel
Jardim de Sá, Marcos Nascimento, João Marinho de Morais Neto.
2. Roadmap:
• brief introduction to UQ-AGES and TANG3O
• justify why 40Ar/39Ar geochronology is useful, necessary, or sometimes the only method
• illustrate the methodological approaches in 40Ar/39Ar
• show some of the difficulties
• show steps to overcome some of the difficulties
• illustrate some successful studies in Australia
• illustrate some successful studies in NE Brazil
• illustrate some successful studies in southeasthern Brazil
• illustrate some advantages in dating altered volcanic rocks (on shore and offshore)
• current projects
• developments
18. Test of the reliability of the 40Ar/39Ar
results
• Analysis of an international standard
with known age:
GA1550 biotite,
age 98.8 ±
0.5Ma (McDougall
& Harrison 1999)
19. Irradiation at OSU Reactor
http://radiationcenter.oregonstate.edu
Approach and Methods
20. Noble Gas Mass Spectrometry:
• Single collector
• Peak Hopping
Approach and Methods
21. Why date mafic igneous rock
by 40Ar/39Ar geochronology?
• Mineralogy:
- mafic magmas are often devoid or poor in U-rich minerals suitable for U-Pb
geochronology (zircon, baddeleyite)
- zircons may occur as xenocrysts in volcanic sequences
- rich in various minerals (feldspars, biotite, amphibole) datable by 40Ar/39Ar
- both phenocrysts and matrix datable
- datable by whole rock analysis
• Mass:
- need several kgs to extract zircon or baddeleyite
- only small fragments (< 2-3 mm) needed for 40Ar/39Ar geochronology
• Process:
- 40Ar/39Ar method provides information on timing of extrusion/cooling
- 40Ar/39Ar method also provides information on susequent re-heating and/or
alteration
• Intercomparison:
- date all samples by the same method in a magmatic province
Disadvantages: K-minerals susceptible to alteration and diffusional losses
22. 40Ar/39Ar Geochronology
High Precision-High Accuracy Geochronological Method for:
• Extrusive Igneous Rocks and Minerals
• Rapidly Cooled Intrusive Igneous Rocks and Minerals
• Rapidly Cooled Metamorphic Rocks and Minerals
• Rapidly Cooled Hydrothermal Rocks and Minerals
• Chemical Sediments
• Diagenetic Minerals
• Weathering Minerals
40Ar/39Ar Geochronology
23. Closure temperature (Tc) is the temperature at which a system (rock, mineral, etc.)
becomes closed to gains and losses of parent and daughter isotopes for a given isotopic
system, assuming an stable and monotonic
cooling history.
For the K-Ar system,
closure temperature is given by:
Tc
E
{Rln[A(D0 /a2
)]}
Tc = closure temperature
Ea = activation energy for molecular diffusion
(in kJ/mol or kcal/mol)
R = Universal Gaas Constant (8.31441 J/mol/K)
A = geometric factor
D0 = frequency factor (in cm2/s),
a = radius of diffusion domain
T = dT/dt = cooling rate
{[RTc
2
]/[E(dT /dt)]}
27. 40Ar/39Ar Thermochronometry
Application of 40Ar/39Ar method to any K-bearing
earth material that formed above and slowly cooled
below its closure temperature.
Thermochronometric method used to study:
• Slowly cooled intrusive igneous rocks and minerals
• Slowly cooled metamorphic rocks and minerals
• Slowly cooled hydrothermal phases
• Sediments with complex thermal histories
• Any rock or mineral that underwent re-heating after
its formation
35. 3 Decades on…
(where do we go from here?)
Compilation in:
Vasconcelos, Knesel, Cohen & Heim, AJES (2008)
36. & Why?
Provides a powerful tool for testing & informing plate
reconstructions & for unraveling tectonic events
37. Working hypothesis:
This collision should have caused a
change in the motion of the
Australian plate
&
this change should be recorded in
hotspot tracks
38. • 15 volcanic centres
spanning c. 800km
• > 300 mineral grains
& groundmass
fragments from ~ 100
samples by laser
incremental heating
Our 40Ar/39Ar experiment
Cohen, Vasconcelos & Knesel, AJES (2007)
Knesel, Cohen, Vasconcelos, & Thiede, Nature (2008) and …..
many more…
40. 25
Westward deflection + reduced
migration rate
provide strong evidence for
first contact between the OJP & Melanesian arc at 26 Ma.
41. Slower plate velocity explains
why SE Qld area is anomalous
The volcanoes erupted between 26-23 Ma are
anomalous:
larger
overlap
have more crustal melts
Slower plate velocity enabled greater time over hotspot
for volcano construction & to melt crust
Knesel, Cohen, Vasconcelos, Thiede, Nature 2008
SRTM data: www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm
Tweed Digital Elevation Model
Many of the volcanoes are
quite big – the largest is
Tweed, which is ~100 km
across
64. Paraná Flood Basalts:
Rapid Extrusion Hypothesis
Supported by New 40Ar/39Ar Results
School of Earth Sciences
David S.Thiede &
Paulo M. Vasconcelos
65. The Controversy
• Duration of the volcanism in the Paraná continental
flood basalt province has two conflicting sets of 40Ar/39Ar
geochronology data.
• One set of results [Renne et al., 1992] indicates that the
Paraná flood volcanism began at 134±1 Ma (corrected for
the currently used value of 28.02±0.09 Ma for the Fish
Canyon fluence monitor) and lasted less than 1 Ma.
• Another set of results [Turner et al., 1994; Stewart et al.,
1996] indicates an interval of 10 Ma, beginning at ca. 138
Ma and ending at ca. 128 Ma.
68. The Possible Causes
• each group of researchers collected and analyzed their own sample
suite and employed different 40Ar/39Ar methodologies.
• Renne et al. (1992):
- samples collected from four vertical Serra Geral sections;
- incremental-heating method on plagioclase and whole rock grains;
- geochronological information from plateau ages in % 39Ar release
spectra.
• Turner et al. (1992) and Stewart et al. (1994):
- sampled a broader region in Brazil, Paraguay, and SE Uruguay
- used a combination of laser and furnace stepped heating on single
crystals, whole rock grains, and in situ laser total fusion extraction
of Ar from various spots in their samples;
- derived age information by plotting the results from stepped
heating or spot analysis onto an 39Ar/40Ar vs. 36Ar/40Ar isotope
correlation diagram (inverse isochron method).
69.
70.
71. UV Pulsed Laser
50-200 µm
laser fusion pit
Laser Total-Fusion Spot Analysis:
• selected areas in the grain are instantaneous fused
72. Visible (blue-green) Continuous Ar Laser
1-2 mm
defocused laser beam
Laser Incremental-heating Analysis:
• the whole grain is incrementally and homogeneously heated
73. UQ-AGES Approach
• we re-dated, by the laser incremental-heating
method, three samples previously analyzed by
Turner et al., 1994 and Stewart et al., 1996.
• we dated three 1-2 mm total rock grains extracted
from the exact same hand specimens analyzed by
these authors (supplied by Marcel Regelous), which
represented the oldest [138.4±1.3 (1s) Ma, sample
PAR-1] and youngest [127.7±4.6 (1s) Ma, sample
DSM23; 129.4±1.3 (1s) Ma, sample DSM05A]
samples in the 10 Ma age range reported by Turner
et al. (1994) and Stewart et al. (1996).
74.
75.
76. Conclusions
• widespread age distribution obtained by Turner et al. (1994)
and Stewart et al. (1996) is an artifact of the methodology
used, and it does not record a true age spread.
• all nine grains analyzed in this study are within error from
each other and correspond, within error, to the ages obtained
by Renne et al. (1992) suggesting that the duration of the
Paraná volcanism was less than 2 Ma.
• geological models that assume that the Paraná flood basalt
volcanism extends for more than 2 Ma are not supported by
geochronological information currently in the literature.
84. Best age determination for each sample:
All 40Ar/39Ar ages are within the main emplacement stage of
134.7 ± 1 Ma proposed by Renne (2015).
Sample
Thiede and
Vasconcelos (2010)
Present study
DSM-05A 134.2 ± 0.8 Ma 135.01 ± 0.35 Ma
DSM-23 134.6 ± 1.1 Ma 134.96 ± 0.36 Ma
PAR-01 134.8 ± 0.7 Ma 135.18 ± 0.33 Ma
• Untreated sample;
• 1 year after irradiation.
• Both untreated and acid-
treated samples;
• 6 months after irradiation.
Take Home Message: Baksi’s Concerns not Justified
96. MBB-211
Idade de cristalização da lava basáltica
(fenocristal de plagioclásio)
MBB-211 (Plagioclase)
Fresh
Ca-plagioclase
phenocryst
Plagioclase phenocryst
Plateau age compatible with
isochron and probability ages.
113.4 ± 0.5 Ma
Fresh plagioclase
(bytownite/labrad
orite)
113.3 ± 0.4 Ma
Fresh matrix
101. Post-salt intrusion – 40Ar/39Ar Geochronology
89 ± 5 Ma
85.4 ± 0.7 Ma
78.4 ± 0.8 Ma
amphibole
biotite
plagioclase
gabbro
102. Diffusion
• Mechanism for Ar loss from a mineral over geologic
residence time
• Governed by the Arrhenius equation:
diffusion rate (D/a2) = (D0/a2) e-Ea/RT
Activation Energy (Ea)
higher = more retentive
Diffusion Constant (D0/a2)
lower = more retentive
• A measure of the ‘conductance’ of diffusion paths in a mineral
- Musset, 1969
103.
104. • systematic variations in diffusive behavior with apparent closure
temperatures for 0.1–1 mm grains of 200–400 °C (assuming a 10 °C/Ma
cooling rate)
• there is no broadly applicable set of diffusion parameters that can be
utilized in feldspar thermal modeling
• sample-specific data are required
• considerable inaccuracies may exist in published thermal histories obtained
using multiple diffusion domain (MDD) models fit to Arrhenius plots for
exsolved alkali feldspar
105. Determine the most probable thermal history
40Ar/39Ar modelling of K-feldspar experiment on resistance furnace
Resistance furnace experiment
Calculate fractions of 39Ar released
Determine diffusion parameters
Plot/Interpret Arrhenius diagrams
Use diffusion coefficients and activation energy
(+ thermochronological constraints) to invert data
From Morais Neto
116. Take Home Message:
• South Atlantic offshore basins offer a
great new frontier of opportunities in the
refinement and application of 40Ar/39Ar
geochronology