Details of Assignment In order to make effective change within .docx

Details of Assignment:
In order to make effective change within an organization, an
analysis of the current organizational state is essential. In this
assignment, you will be analyzing the current innovative status
within your own organization or an organization of your choice.
This organization will also be used in several subsequent
assignments. In your 500-750 word organizational analysis
paper, address the following questions:
1. What are your organization's competitors' current trends of
innovation?
2. How does your organization's innovativeness compare to its
competitors'?
3. Within your organization, which stakeholders are responsible
for supporting innovation? In what capacity?
4. Examining your organization's structure, systems, and people,
how adaptable is the organization for implementing innovative
principles and practices?
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the
APA Style Guide,
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
RUBRICS
Top of Form
Organizational Innovation Analysis
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Competitor Trends
Current innovation trends of the competitor are not included.
Current innovation trends of the competitor are minimally
included, but lack detail and description.
Current innovation trends of the competitor are minimally
included and described.
Current innovation trends of the competitor are included and
described in detail.
Current innovation trends of the competitor are included and
described in exemplary detail.
15.0 %Trend Comparison
A trend comparison of an organization and its competitors is not
included.
A trend comparison of an organization and its competitors is
included, but lacks clarity and detail.
minimally included and described.
included and described in detail.
included and described in exemplary detail.
20.0 %Stakeholder Analysis
Stakeholders responsible for innovative support are not

identified or defined.
Stakeholders responsible for innovative support are identified or
defined.
Stakeholders responsible for innovative support are minimally
identified and defined.
Stakeholders responsible for innovative support are
appropriately identified and defined.
Stakeholders responsible for innovative support are identified
and defined with exceptional detail.
25.0 %Organizational Structure Analysis
An organizational analysis of the structure, systems, and people
is not included.
An organizational analysis of the structure, systems, or people
is included, but lacks a description of innovative adaptability.
is included with a brief description of innovative adaptability.
is included with an appropriate description of innovative
adaptability.
is included with an exemplary description of innovative
adaptability.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper.
Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim
in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are
present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
assignment)
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is
rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors
in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and
style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting
errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

Bottom of Form
HSCO 500
Research Paper – Working Outline Instructions
Using current APA format, you will create a Working Outline as
the next step towards your Final Research Paper. This outline
will include a title page and a references page(s), making any
corrections from the Research Topic Paper and Annotated
Bibliography Paper feedback.
You will outline your proposed Final Paper into various
sections. You must include a brief summary (thesis statement)
of the kind of content and scholarly sources you plan to include,
giving a clear direction for your Final Research Paper.
You must cite ALL the sources from your Annotated
Bibliography paper into the Working Outline (carefully review
the provided Working Outline Example!). You can add or delete
sources as you build your outline, however, ALL proposed
sources (minimum of 10 books and journals) must be cited in
the outline!
Sources must be referenced as appropriate, following current
APA format, and you must include your references in an APA
References page at the end of the Working Outline. Make sure
to review the “Working Outline Example” and follow that
format in your Working Outline paper that you upload for
grading!
This assignment is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of
Module/Week 5.

Working Outline
A working outline is crafted after all of your preliminary
research is done. It is a solid
tool to organize all of the concepts you will address in your
research paper and can easily be
converted into a final draft of your actual paper.
Use standard outlining format (see below), with your thesis
statement above the first
Roman numeral entry; it will become the foundation for your
introductory paragraph. (which in
APA style is never preceded by a heading titled “introduction”):
numerated as Roman
numerals (I, II, III). These
should be left-justified, in standard outline format. They will
later become your Level 1
headings (see page 62 of your APA manual). Include some
bullets or phrases to support
each, with citations in proper APA format for the resources in
your reference list.
Complete sentences are not necessary in an outline.

be labeled with capital
letters (A, B, C). These should be indented ½”, in standard
outline format. They will
later become your Level 2 headings.
labeled with Arabic
numbers (1, 2, 3). These should be indented 1”, in standard
outline format. They will
become your Level 3 headings.
lowercase letters (a, b, c).
These would be indented 1-1/2”, in standard outline format.
They would become your
Level 4 headings.
sues supporting the Level 4
headings, which would be
labeled with lowercase Roman numerals (i, ii, iii). These would
be indented 2”. They
would become Level 5 headings.
As with all outlines and papers, there must be at least two
divisions for each level used, if
any. Outlines cannot have a “I” without a “II” or an “A” without
a “B,” for example. Likewise,

APA papers cannot have just one Level 2 heading under a Level
1 heading; there must be at least
two Level 2 headings under that Level 1 heading, or no Level 2
headings there at all. In other
words, if you don’t plan to divide the larger section into two or
more smaller sections, do not
divide it at all. Each new larger section starts anew. It is
possible to have five Roman numerals,
with capital letters under just the fourth one; others may have
capital letter divisions under every
Roman numeral.
Also note that the information included under each section
should NOT be in compete
sentences. Phrases should be short and direct. A standard title
page and reference page are
also required, as required in all APA assignments. Sample
working outline follows on the
next page, with an example of how you would take that outline
and convert it into an actual APA
paper.
.

Running head: SAMPLE PAPER 1
A Sample Paper for the Purpose of Correct Formatting
Student Name
Liberty University
Per the Publication Manual of the American Psychological
Association (APA; 6th edition), double-space the
entire paper (p. 229), except with charts or tables. Do not add
any extra spacing. Use Times New Roman,
12-point font. Do not use bold except for headings as necessary
(see page 62 of your APA manual).
Margins are set for 1" on top, bottom, and sides. All page
references will be to the APA manual, 6th edition.
Add two spaces after punctuation at the end of each sentence,
except in the reference list, for the sake of
readability (pp. 87-88). The header on the cover page is
different from the headers on the rest of the paper.

Only the cover page header includes the words Running head
(without the italics; p. 41). The header is flush
left but the page numbers are flush right (see bottom of p. 229).
Make sure the header font is the same as the
rest of the paper. Handouts on how to format the cover page (as
well as other handouts) are available on the
Online Writing Center’s webpage:
http://www.liberty.edu/index.cfm?PID=17176, and a superb
YouTube
video demonstration that provides visualized step-by-step
instructions for setting a paper up in proper APA
format is available at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUjhwGmhDrI
Note: Comments inside boxes are not part of the formatting of
the paper. Section or page number references
to the APA manual are denoted in parentheses throughout. Most
citations within the body of this paper are
fictional, for instructional purposes only, but are also included
in the reference list for illustrative purposes of
correlating citations in the body of the paper with resources in
the reference list.
Note: Center the following information in the top half of the
page: title, your name, and school name (2.01, p.

23; 41). Some professors require the course title and section,
the instructor’s name, and the date; add those on
the lines beneath the required title page information. Do not use
contractions in formal papers—in either the
title or the body of the paper (i.e., use “do not” rather than
“don’t”). Titles should include no more than 12
words. Titles use upper and lowercase letters (i.e., “title case;”
20.1, p. 23; see also 4.15 on pp. 101-102).
Prepared by Christy Owen, Brian Aunkst, and Dr. Carmella
O’Hare. Last updated June 28, 2016.
http://www.liberty.edu/index.cfm?PID=17176
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUjhwGmhDrI
SAMPLE PAPER 2
A Sample Paper for the Purpose of Correct Formatting
Thesis: God designed and created man with an internal yearning
to have close interpersonal
relationships and attachment to Him and others, thus behavioral
issues resulting from attachment
disorders have spiritual implications.
I. The Core Causations of Reactive Attachment Disorder:

A. Attachment Theory and Development of Attachment Styles
1. John Bowlby; Jane Ainsworth.
2. Anxious/ambivalent, avoidant, or secure (Besharat, 2011, p.
475).
a. 16% = anxious/ ambivalent;
b. 21% = avoidant;
c. 63% = secure (Levy, Ellison, Scott, & Bernecker, 2011, p.
193).
3. Childhood attachment styles develop into lifelong patterns.
B. Pathways to Depravity:
1. RAD develops during the first three years of a child’s life;
2. Due to lack of adequate and appropriate caretaker;
3. RAD = lack of empathy; research = confirmed link between
compromised levels

of empathy and “an increased propensity to engage in antisocial
behaviors”;
(Thompson & Gullone, 2008, p. 123).
C. Statistics:
1. United States:
a. 38-40% of foster children;
b. 195,000.
2. International:
a. 1% of all children worldwide;
b. 22,000,000 (Hall & Geher, 2003, p. 149).
SAMPLE PAPER 3
II. Correlations Between One’s Attachment to Others and
Corresponding Attachment to God
A. Attachment to Others:

1. People = flesh-and-bone correlation of God’s design.
2. By definition = children with RAD shun true intimacy with
everyone/God.
B. God Image and Attachment:
1. Scriptural correlations:
a. “Man is designed to relate to God and the human brain is [in
fact] ‘wired
for God’” (Fayard, Pereau, & Ciovica, 2009, p. 167).
b. Jesus Christ = “living water” (John 4:10, 13).
c. Bible = replete with imagery of God as a compassionate,
caring, involved,
devoted and doting father to His children (Fayard et. al., 2009,
p. 172).
d. God’s own example = emotional intimacy, bonding, secure
attachment.
2. Impact of personal religiosity on attachment:
a. Parents with higher levels of personal religiosity = “stronger

authoritative
parenting skills … and report less parent-child conflict”
(Pickering &
Vazsonyi, 2010, p. 98).
b. Children with a genuine relationship with God = stronger
resilience in
navigating the adolescent years (Pickering & Vazsonyi, 2010, p.
111-
112).
C. Spiritual Implications:
1. RAD = spiritual implications because it necessarily interferes
with the person’s
ability to relate to God;
2. It interferes with a person’s ability to relate to others.
III. Conclusion
SAMPLE PAPER 4
References

Besharat, M. (2011). Development and validation of adult
attachment inventory. Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 475–479.
Fayard, C., Pereau, M., & Ciovica, A. (2009). ‘Love the Lord
with all your mind’: Explorations
on a possible neurobiology of the experience of god and some
implications for the
practice of psychotherapy. Journal of Psychology and
Christianity, 28(2), 167-181.
Hall, S., & Geher, G. (2003). Behavioral and personality
characteristics of children with reactive
attachment disorder. The Journal of Psychology, 137(2), 145-
162.
Levy, K., Ellison, W., Scott, L. & Bernecker, S. (2011).
Attachment style. Journal of Clinical
Psychology: In Session, 67(2), 193-203.
Pickering, L., & Vazsonyi, A. (2010). Does family process
mediate the effect of religiosity on
adolescent deviance?: Revisiting the notion of spuriousness.
Criminal Justice and
Behavior, 37, 97-118. doi: 10.1177/0093854809347813
Thompson, K., & Gullone, E. (2008). Prosocial and antisocial
behaviors in adolescents: An

investigation into associations with attachment and empathy.
Anthrozoos, 21(2), 123-137.
doi: 10.2752/175303708X305774

Details of Assignment In order to make effective change within .docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from simonithomas47935

More from simonithomas47935 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Details of Assignment In order to make effective change within .docx