The Causes Of The Great War

The Causes Of The Great War
There were many events that led to The Great War, also known as World War I. A big reason why so many countries were sucked into the war is
because of the alliances that were formed. The alliance system created a two–sided structure in which countries were forced to pick a side. Some
countries based their decisions on age–old disputes and cultural alliances. Countries like Austria and Germany joined together to form the Triple
Alliance. Opposing the Triple Alliance was the Triple Entente, consisting of France, Russia, and Britain. Entente is a French term that means mutual
understanding. The members of the Triple Entente were concerned with Germanyз—ґ growing nationalism and military power. Nationalism is a sense
of belonging to a particular
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Triple Alliance Dbq
The Entente's odds in 1917 were grim. Both major offensives ended up in failure, the Russians abandoned the war, the Italians were close to
annihilation after Caporetto, and the Americans sent over troops in small droves that were not battle ready. However, behind the wins of the Triple
Alliance, things were not boding well for them. The British blockade was slowly starving them, and Germany's primary ally, Austria–Hungary, was
more of a liability than a help. Come 1918, Germany knew they needed a big push for the win. Their supplies were rapidly depleting as all efforts to
thwart the continuation of Britain's blockade via "unrestricted submarine warfare" were unsuccessful. American troops were being shipped in, albeit
slowly, and Germany

Battle Of The Marne Essay
After a series of quick victories for the Germans, the First Battle of the Marne marked the first use of trench warfare on the Western front and the
French were able to gain a critical victory for the Allies using good communication and better organization than the Germans. In the first few weeks
of the war, the Germans were trying to push the Russians back to Russia in the east. In the fifth week of the war, the Germans had destroyed the
Russian army at the Battle of Tannenberg. Before the Battle of the Marne, at the end of August, the Germans had been advancing on Paris for two
weeks. The path the Germans planned to take to defeat the French was based on the Schlieffen Plan. This was a German military strategy for a
two–front war with France and Russia created by Count Alfred von Schlieffen, the chief of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When the Germans came within about 20 miles from Paris, the commander of the French army, General Joseph Joffre, formed a new Sixth Army to
protect Paris while he was also communicating with his subordinates and planning a counterattack on the Germans with the rest of his armies. This
newly recruited army was a great advantage over the exhausted Germans who had been marching and fighting for over 300 miles. Perhaps the
defining factor in the Germans' loss was their armies' lack of communication. The German chief of staff General Helmuth von Moltke was over 200
miles away in Luxembourg, and his generals did not know what each other were doing. The crucial turning point (in the direction of defeat) for the
Germans was on September 6th, when General Michel–Joseph Maunoury and his troops got to the battle front in Parisian buses and taxis, causing
General Alexander von Kluck (of Germany) to quickly move southwest to meet the attack, which created a gap between his troops and those of
General Karl von Bulow's Second Army that was northeast of the

Stalemate On The Western Front Research Paper
The stalemate on the Western Front was a predicament which was not foreseen by either the Allies or Central Powers. The stalemate that had
established by the commencement of 1915 was the ramification of a multitude of factors. These factors emerged due to the failures of the Allies' and
Central Powers' war plans and their implementation of unsuccessful and obsolete tactics, the fluctuating nature of warfare and naive prospects of war.
The unrealistic expectations of war by all European nations directly contributed to the development of stalemate on the Western Front. With the
commencement of war in August 1914, there was a communal excitement and credence that the war would be "brief, glorious and over by Christmas".
Military commanders placed ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both sides originally believed that the Great War would be over quickly. InGermany, this belief was based on the long–established Schlieffen Plan. The
German generals were confident in the success of the war plan that Kaiser Wihlem II proclaimed that he would have "Paris for lunch, St. Petersburg for
dinner", enticing that Paris would be captured in 42 days and would then shift their focus to the Eastern Front and defeat the Russians. The Schlieffen
plan however relied on strict timing, with no interruptions in its timetable and the assumption that Russia would still be feeble after their defeat in the
Russo–Japanese War, thus taking longer to mobilise. With the failure of not considering other alternatives, Schlieffen's conception assumed the
absence of any enemy in which was "...an astonishing assumption for a commander" (AJP Taylor). Schlieffen retired in 1906 and was replaced
swiftly by Helmuth von Moltke whom was considered a more vigilant and audacious leader, preceding to his amendments of the original plan,
"dooming the plan before it was ever launched" (L.C.F. Turner). Moltke disregarded the original plan of luring the French into Germany through
Alsace–Lorraine, and instead diverted a portion of men from the upper right hook into Paris and to the defence of Alsace–Lorraine. Furthermore,
Moltke made the decision to not travel through Holland and make use of their rail system. As a result, the German Army became bottlenecked and
their "fighting power was practically numbed by physical exhaustion" due to their "supplies [failing] to keep pace" (Liddel–Hart). In turn, French
strategy was heavily preoccupied with breaking German borders through Alsace–Lorraine, thus neglecting defence along the Belgian border, allowing
Germany to penetrate these borders and advance closer towards Paris. Heavy

The First Battle of the Marne was one of the most significant battle in the first stages if the emerging war to later be known as the "Great War". It was
conducted by the Allied French and British forces against the German advance emerging from Belgium. The Germans had major successes in previous
battles against the French in France's north east until finally being slowed to a halt at the Marne River. New tactics and techniques were utilized at this
time in order to gain any upper hand against the opposing forces; tactics such as radio signal interception and aerial reconnaissance. This battle also
forced the German into fortifying themselves into series of elaborate trenched in order to maintain the front, which became typical of the western front
until the end of the war.
On 6 September 1914, the First Battle of the Marne was an offensive conducted by the French army and the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) against
advancing Germans who had, at this time, already invaded Belgium and northeastern France. Allied forces were becoming desperate by this time
because ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After numerous German victories hitherto, the French had found an opportunity to halt the German successes by exploiting a gap between the German
second and third armies at the Marne River. French air reconnaissance and radio intercepts (the first to be used in a major conflict) identified this
opportunity to the French commander–in–chief Joseph Joffre. On 6 September, The French fifth army and the BEF were ordered to exploit the gap and
isolate the German first army. The next day the German first and second armies were threatened by encirclement. With the news being reported to
German high command, the forces were ordered to retreat to a defensive position behind the Aisne River, negating the Schlieffen Plan and reversing the
German momentum in the start of the

World War 1 Turning Point Essay
The Greatest Turning Point In History World War 1, a major combat fought amid 1914 and 1918 between the Allied Powers and the Central Powers. A
catalyst for the purpose of industrialization, advanced manufacture and technology, and the development of new strategies. As a whole, it was the
second deadliest conflict in history, with over 9 million combatants killed at the hands of hefty technological advances in artillery. The assassination of
the Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the main motivation for starting the war. After Ferdinand's assassination, Austria declared war on Serbia.
Then, Russia prepared in order to defend its ally, Serbia. Germany declared war on Russia to Protect Austria. This caused France to declare war on
Germany... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was a devastating loss for Russia, which lost an entire army, 400 guns, as well as other military equipment. Alexander Samsonov the Russian
commander and general committed suicide because of the fact that he felt defeated by the Germans.
In September of 1914,the Battle of Marne, German Marshal Alfred Von Schlieffen brought up a plan to capture Paris. When the army under German
General Alex Von Kluck targeted the north of Paris, they were to pass into the River Marne valley and cross French defenses, which only exposed
them. Yet, French General Joseph Joffre ordered a halt to French retreat and reinforced the left flank. It was a great strategic victory for France, which
enabled them to continue the war and evade capture from Germany by pushing them 45 miles away.
Throughout an eight month period,the 1915–1916 Battle of Gallipoli was initiated with a failed naval attack by British and French ships on the
Dardanelles Straits in February–March 1915 and continued with a major land invasion of the Gallipoli Peninsula on April 25, involving British and
French troops as well as divisions of the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps. Was an unsuccessful attempt by the Allied Powers to control the sea
route from Europe to Russia where they could attack Constantinople, the Ottoman

World War 1 Cause And Effect Essay
World War I, which is well known as "The First World War" and "The Great War" and "The War to End All Wars". This war was called "The First
World War" because it was the first war that happened in world history. World War 1 is called "The Great War" because over fifty
–nine million troops
were organized for war, over eight million people died during this war, and over 29 million people were injured during the fight for their country.
World War 1 was called "The War to End All Wars" because there were people who felt that the government would be damaged that would and could
lead to war. The main cause of World War 1 was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria on June 28, 1914. Archduke Franz
Ferdinand and his wife, Sophie were assassinated by 19 year old Serbian nationalist... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Following the Schlieffen Plan, heading towards Paris, when France planned a surprise attack on the Germans which started the First Battle of
Marne. Because of their loss at the Battle of Marne, the Germans were not able to eliminate the second front of World War 1, the war was to last
years rather than months. Second, on February 21, 1916, the Battle of Verdun begun. This battle was the longest battle in World War 1, and was
most definitely the bloodiest. With a total of 1,250,000 people that died during the Battle of Verdun. There were many more soldiers and civilians
killed during this battle. This battle lasted from February 21, 1916 to December 18, 1916. This battle was the largest, and one of the largest in World
War 1. Third, on January 19, 1917, Germany sent the secret Zimmerman Telegram to Mexico in an effort to attract Mexico to join the war. The secret
Zimmerman Telegram was a secret diplomatic communication supplied by the German Foreign Office in January 1917 that proposed a military
alliance between Germany and Mexico in the before event of the United States entering World War 1 against

Papa Joffre Character Analysis
Papa Joffre, a name that connotes a rather lighter tone, and conveys a sense of compassion and sympathy in one's conduct: qualities that sharply
contrast the unpleasantries of war. His title is a faГ§ade that overlooks his true achievements as French commander–in–chief during the first world war.
Joseph Joffre changed the outcome of the conflict due to his execution of the war plan, leadership in the Battle of the Marne, and leadership in other
offensives. He was a force to be reckoned with, a man who dominated the field, and a man who drastically impacted the war. Joseph Joffre consistently
served with distinction, which led to his rise to power. While studying at Ecole polytechnique, a military academy, he "served as an officer in the Franco
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His predisposition to heavy offensives also contributed to his downfall, because they were "unsuccessful...against the German lines". In addition, he
"removed most of the heavy guns from the fortress of Verdun" which led to a disaster at the battle of Verdun (Rickard). His resolve and resilience,
had in exchange been replaced with stubbornness, in his pursuit of his offenses. It demonstrated that he had disregard for men, heartless, and
sometimes even clueless which would lead one to speculate how one was competent to lead. This style of leading led to "bundles of dead man and
overcrowded hospitals" (Stokesbury 59). It was callous, and heartless. In spite of his actions, the little guys took the fall, and "lost their posts". But, it
was only a matter of time before it ate away at Joffre's fame. Eventually, his unscrupulous actions led to his resignation as commander–in–chief, but he
was "promoted away from the front line, created a Marshal of France". Despite the prestigious title, his final years were performing "symbolic duties"
and nothing in particular of substance. In the end, he is a figure who is "still the subject of much controversy" to this day (Rickard).
He was not without flaws. He overstepped his boundaries, and as a result, his pitfall. Joseph Joffre was a flawed man, but that does not overshadow his
overall legacy: Halting the Germans at the Battle of the Marne. What

Causes Of World War 1 Essay
World War 1 Causes It all started in June 28, 1914 when Archduke Ferdinand who was the prince of Austria
–Hungary got assassinated in Sarajevo,
Bosnia where a person by the name Gavrilo Princip that shot Archduke Ferdinand and his wife SofГa Chotek while riding back from the town hall in
Sarajevo. This big action led Austria–Hungary to declare war on Serbia because the Serbia army did not turn in the assassin to do his crime in
Austria–Hungary and also blame the government for not stopping the plot after the government heard about it. Austria–Hungary knew that they could
not win the war by them self with Serbia because there army was weak and unprepared, the Austria–Hungary asks there ally Germany who was a friend
to them to help them to fight of the Serbians. This led Serbia to ask Russia which was friends with France and Great Britain to protect them from the
attack.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This battle led Germany their first victory and advance further in France. After days of fighting the Triple Entente who was France, Great Britain and
Russia were losing the war with to the Triple Alliance who was Germany, Austria
–Hungary, and Italy. Great Britain asks United States to help them but
United States couldn't because they were in a depression of their own and also they were neutral. On May 7, 1915 a German U–boat torpedoed and
sank the RMS Lusitania which hade Americans board in the ships from New York to Liverpool, United Kingdom which led the United States to enter
World War 1 and to go against Germany. On April 6, 1917, the U.S. joined its allies Britain, France, and Russia which made a huge turn on the war
when United States came with improved tanks, artillery, airplanes and

Battle Of The Marne
The first battle of World War 1, better known as The Battle of the Marne, included many significant battles. This is one battle in particular worth
spotlighting when thinking about the United States Army and its allies. The Battle of the Marne holds such importance to U.S. history and the world.
For the very first time in history, the use of radio intercepts and automotive transport of troops in wartime commenced during this battle. The Battle of
the Marne took place September 6, 1914 through September 12, 1914 some 30 miles from Paris. During this time, the offensive strategy by the French
Army and the British Expeditionary forces resembles what we do in modern day warfare. The use of trench and flanking offensive strategies utilized...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The stand at the Aisne River marks another historic landmark in World War 1. During the end of the battle of the Marne, most German forces had
regrouped in the Aisne River. This marked the beginning of trench warfare. Both opposing forces began to use trenches on the Western front of
the Aisne River. On September 13, 1914, opposing forces began flanking maneuvers in which today we call the Race to the Sea. During the Race
to the Sea, the French failed to remove the German stance north of the Aisne River. Several key factors caused the quick turnaround that caused the
German Armies to retreat. Primarily the German's underestimated French tactics. They realized that once German's First Army was close to Paris,
the French would give in and retreat. While the French in fact were retreating, they were using rail systems to transport troops back and forth. The
German First Army found their advance hampered by broken bridges and rails lines on their side of the French border. This caused shortage in food
supplies and ammunition to German Armies. This major issue also caused the breakdown in communication within German's First and Second
Armies causing huge gaps in their defensive line. This was enough for French and British troops to come up with the plan to flank the gap the
Germans had created during their advancement into Paris. The First Battle of the Marne was a huge success for the French and British Army at the
cost of thousands of troops. This did not end the conflict, but was more of a start of conflicts to come during World War 1. This key victory was able
to push German's back at least 40 to 50 miles from the capital city of

German Military Strategist In 1914
German military strategist were ready when the declarations of war began flying all over Europe. They intended to lock off the Russians in the east,
smoothly kick France out of the war through a plan known as the Schliefffen Plan, then throw their full force, collaborating with Austria–Hungary,
against the Russians. The Schliefffen Plan, named after General Alfred von Schlieffen who created it during 1905, called for invading the small
countries like Luxembourg and Belgium in order to bypass to the north the strong fortifications along the French border. After a rapid conquest of the
small countries, the German advance would continue into northern France, spin around Paris to the west and take the French capital. It almost worked,
but German commander in chief General Helmuth von Moltke decided to send his troops east of Paris to engage and defeat the weakened French
army straightly. In doing so he displayed his rightwing to counterattack by the French and a British Expeditionary Force, resulting in the First Battle of
the Marne, September 6–10, 1914. Despite casualties in the hundreds of thousands, the battle was a stalemate, but it stopped the German drive on Paris.
Both sides began digging a network of trenches.

World War 1 Turning Point Essay
World War 1 or the Great War was a turning point for war in itself and for the people's view of it. Before war was something to be celebrated but the
creation of machine guns, gasses, and other horrible creations of the 1910s made war something to be feared by everyone. The assassination of
Austrian Prince Archduke Ferdinand by a Serbian Nationalist Gavrilo Princip stirred up tensions leading to World War 1 starting in mid
–August 1914,
which put the Allied powers ( Great Britain, France, Russia, Italy Japan, and in 1917 the United States) against the Central powers ( Germany,
Austria–Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire). World War 1 lasted 4 years and brought more casualties and wounded that any other war up until that point
and a fear of a war of this magnitude ever happening again. The first major battle of the Marne fought on the Western Front to the final battle of the
Argonne Forest. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They invaded France on the west through Belgium and invaded Russia on the east creating the Eastern and Western Front. On September6, 1914
British forces confronted the invading German army and started the battle of the Marne. Germany was within 30 miles from Paris and the Allied
troops led by Joseph Joffre and forced the Germans north of the Aisne River and both sides dug into trenches and the next three days of fighting
would characterize the rest of the war. The battle of the Somme was fought July through November 1916 was the bloodiest battle in a of World War 1
where 1.5 million troops on both sides would die in the battle. During the Somme a Franco–British offensive attacked the Germans on the other side of
the river with the British taking the north side and the French taking the South side. The Germans were forced to retreat weakened by the battle to new
shorter defence

Schlieffen Plan Strengths
Strength and Weaknesses of the Schlieffen Plan The First World War raged through the world from 1914 to 1918. Germany and Austria
–Hungary
fought the allies consisting of Great Britain, France, Italy, Japan, Russia, and the United States. The war led to massive destruction and many
deaths on both sides. All the European powers had to move millions of men so that they could be at their positions and be ready for war. One of the
most famous war plans in First World War was the Schlieffen Plan. The plan was created by the chief of the German general staff Alfred von
Schlieffen from 1891 to 1905. The plan's main purpose was to avoid a two–front war with France and Russia but it had major issues. The plan took big
risks and was very inflexible. The plan depended on that France would be quickly beaten, and that Russia would be slow to mobilize and was
therefore based on assumptions. The Schlieffen Plan had strengths but the weaknesses were too big for the plan to be successful.... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
This made them weaker both on both sides. Even though the attack on France almost succeeded the Battle of Marne was lost and since this was a
major part of the plan it contributed to the failure of the plan. The plan could only continue and be successful if Germany had defeated France quickly
instead the war turned to trench warfare especially since the Schlieffen Plan was the only plan Germany had. The Schlieffen Plan weaknesses were
major in comparison to the strengths. Germany had to complete the plan completely as it was planned. In order for it to be successful since their
actions depended on that certain things would happen. Therefore it only needed minor mistake to change the success of Germany. Relying on
assumptions as they did through the Schlieffen plan ended up having major consequences for Germany and for the following course of First World

Binyon For The Fallen
For the Fallen by Laurence Binyon is a third person tribute to the British men killed in action. Written following the Battles of Mons and Marne,
the first heavy fighting of the war by the British, this poem deals largely with the finality of death for the men who fought at these battles who no
longer will enjoy friends and will never grow old as their surviving comrades do and those who did not fight do. It describes soldiers as sons of
England and recognizes their sacrifices as acts of martyrdom that the survivors of war and those at home are not to forget. In its final two stanzas it
recognizes their place among the stars, beings that will never truly be gone.
2) In this poem, Binyon is trying to say that there is a justification and glory in the death and that these young men who gave their lives have not died
in vain, but "in the cause of the free". He also insists that despite the fact they may not enjoy their worldly lives anymore, they serve forever as a light
to guide England through the war.
3)Binyon personifies England as the mother to the dead soldiers her children, as well as parallel structures particularly in the fifth stanza. He repeats
"They" in reference to the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The references to soldiers as "spirit of her spirit", her referring to England, suggests that these soldiers and their deaths are a source of great pride
to the motherland. This perspective is one that would have been peddled mostly by domestic supporters of the war and propaganda offices as it is
very inspirational and ideal, creating an image of death that would not scare soldiers away from enlistment. It is an account much more typical of
someone who was not a soldier during the war as it features no references to violence and isn't cynical in nature, and ignores that survivors of these
two battles had already begun to suffer from forms of PTSD(Gilbert CH.

Battle Of Belle Wood Essay
The Battle of Belleau Wood is significant in Marine Corps history because it spawned its most notable nickname "The Devil Dogs". It was the
Germans who gave them this name because of their fighting strength and it also produced some of the most famous quotes in history. During World
War 1 Germany occupied France in Belleau Wood which is located near the Marne River. "In March 1918, nearly 50 additional German divisions were
sent to France or the Western Front after the surrender of the Russians on the Eastern Front." (History–com, pg.3). They hoped to defeat the allies
before reinforcements could be sent. The British Fifth Army was virtually destroyed and German forces reached had some North Bank near the Marne
River near the end of May 1918.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They fought off nearly five divisions of German troops; often reduced to bayonet fighting or even using their fists in hand to hand combat. On June
26th, a report was sent out stating quite simply "Woods now US Marine Corps entirely." This battle was one of the most ferocious and bloodiest
battle of World War 1. The US suffered a total of 9,777 injuries of these, 1,811 were deaths. Many were buried in the nearby American cemetery. There
is no conclusive number of German casualties; although 1,600 Germans were taken prisoner. (History.com, pg.6). After the battle the French renamed
the wood of Wood ofthe Marine brigade and a special German report also states that the Marines were vigorous self–confident and remarkable
marksman. A US Army General also stated that the deadliest weapon in the world is a Marine and his rifle. A common nickname of the US Marines
is Devil Dogs. Although the history is unclear of when or what exactly was said by the Germans is generally accepted that the Germans did give them
the nickname Teufelshund as a loose translation this comes out dogs from hell. Some believe that the name comes from a diary of a German soldier
killed in battle. In his diary,

Mission Command Analysis of Helmuth Johannes Ludwig Von...
"One either lets me do as I want or one gives me concrete orders," General Donrad Krafft von Dellmensingen, German Sixth Army Chief of Staff
responsed when it was suggested he suspend offensive employment of his army.
The First Battle of the Marne, also classified as the most, "significant land battle of the twentieth century," impresses one for its scale, decisiveness, and
devastating use of rapid small arms fire, machine guns, hand grenades, and artillery. From 5 through 11 September, Germany and France each fielded
over 2 million men (British 130,000) between Paris and Verdun. The most modern military technology to date was brought to bear by both sides to
terrible effect. During the month of August, each country suffered ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was to be "a lightning forty–day wheel through Belgium and northern France ending in a victorious entry march into Paris, followed by a
redeployment of German armies to the east to halt the Russian steamroller." Germany began the war on 3 August occupying the whole of France's
eastern border from Switzerland up to Luxembourg with Seventh, Sixth, Fifth, and Fourth armies. Third Army then proceeded to occupy Luxembourg,
without resistance, before fighting through Belgium's extensive fortifications beginning on 6 August and culminating on 16 August with the fall of
LiГЁge, Belgium's most significant fortification. Afterwards, the German Army began to push First and Second armies, which combined made up over
two–thirds of Germany's Western forces, into northern France. Refer to Figure 1, Map of theFirst Battle of the Marne, 1914.
First and Second armies formed the spoke of the wheel, while the hub was created by the Third and Fourth armies. This left Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh
armies to hold the line against the aggressive French Plan XVII. Plan XVII called for a French frontal attack at Alsace–Lorraine with the British
Expeditionary Force (BEF) protecting the left flank. From 14 to 31 August, over eight battles raged between German and French soldiers with the
Germans gaining ground and forcing the Entente powers to retreat back towards Paris, ending French Plan XVII. French Army Chief of Staff, Joseph
Joffre, called an orderly retreat and restructured his

Mission Command Effectiveness
Mission command is a critical part of leadership. Commanders drive the operations process and are the most important participants. Analyzing a
commander's effectiveness in the six principles of the operations process will help to assess how effective a commander is at using mission command
properly and how it affects the outcome of the battle. This paper will analyze Chief of Staff von Moltke's ineffectiveness in the principles of operations
during the First Battle of the Marne.
The First Battle of the Marne took place from 05–12 September 1914 between the Germans, led by Chief of Staff Helmuth Johannes von Moltke, and
the British and French led by General Joseph Joffre. This battle took place approximately one month after the outbreak of World... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Competent commanders must be able to understand the plan in order to visualize their desired end–state. Germany's Schlieffen Plan was a realistic one
however; the Germans were unable to achieve it because their commander was not competent enough to fully visualize what the plan entailed. Once a
commander visualizes his plan, he then describes it to his staff and subordinates in order to facilitate shared understanding and purpose.7 These three
principles go hand in hand with each other because if a commander is incapable of one of these he will unquestionably fail at the other

Failure Of The Stalemate On The Western Front
The main theatre of fighting in World War One was on the Western Front. The Western Front was a stretch of land weaving through France and
Belgium from the Swiss Boarder to the North Sea. The belligerents on the Western front consisted of the central powers, Austria– Hungary and
Germany pitted against the Entente Powers. This involved the British empire, the Russian empire and the French with the addition of the United
States from 1917 onwards. The creation of the stalemate on the Western Front is linked to a variety of reasons. These include the failure of the
Schlieffen plan, The Battle of the Marne, Plan 17 and the Race to the Sea and the defensiveness of weapons. Failure of the Schlieffen Plan To a large
extent the failure of the Schlieffen plan was the most significant reason for the creation of the western front. The Schleiffen Plan was a defensive
military strategy to deal with the French and Russian forces , staunch allies, in order to avoid a war on two fronts. Which was not what Germany
wanted. This plan created by Von Schleiffen Outlined that troops being sent through Belgium and the Netherlands whilst simultaneously having the
bulk of troops travel down to defend the Alsace Lorraine region which Germany had gained in the Franco Prussian war (1970). The troops at Belgium
would attack as a hammer swing effect for they would travel south and around Paris capturing the city whilst the French forces were distracted.
However, on the contrary

The Importance Of Mission Command In The First Battle Of...
Mission Command in the First Battle of the Marne
The First Battle of the Marne was the first major battle of World War I. Fought in September of 1914, the battle marked the end of the German advance
toward Paris and the beginning of trench warfare. The battle exhibited a number of firsts in the history of warfare, motorized movement of troops and
interception of radio communications. It indicated that the war would not be a quick victory for Germany (Klein, 2014). Joseph Joffre, the French
Commander in Chief, exhibited ingenuity and leadership to yield a significant victory while the Helmuth von Moltke the younger, the German chief of
staff, demonstrated a failure of mission command resulting in defeat.
The Schlieffen Plan was a German battle plan to fight a two front war devised in 1905 by Alfred von Schlieffen as the Chief of the General Staff for
Germany. The plan called for the German army to apply overwhelming force in France to capture the capital of Paris within six weeks before
changing focus to Russia. The plan intended to achieve a quick and decisive victory by sweeping a line of armies through neutral Belgium and into
France. In actuality, Helmuth von Moltke made significant changes to Schlieffen's original plan before and during World War I. Ultimately, the plan
ended in failure when the German advance halted at the First Battle of the Marne (Limbach, 2014).
The advent of World War I saw the swift movement of German forces through Europe into France.

The Four Main Causes Of World War One
Pro: The United States was successfully able to end WW1. The Great War was a conflict that occurred in 1914 between the Triple Alliance (Germany,
Italy, Austria–Hungary) and the Triple Entente (Britain, France, Russia). The four main causes were militarism, alliance, imperialism, and nationalism,
which concentrated on the forms of management. The alliance was built between foreign nations in case of a conflict due to the great amount of
tension and interests of surpassing others. The event that sparked the first World War was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria.
Due to the alliance, one nation after another was brought into the conflict. If the confrontation is reevaluated and summarized under consideration, it
can be

How Did World War 1 Occur
World War one happened because an archduke of Austria
– Hungary named Franz Ferdinand was assassinated by a Serbian nationalist. It was the first
world war and it was also a global war that began in Europe on the 28th of July 1914. The United Sates got into the war when they joined their allies;
France, Britain, and Russia. First the U.S. wanted to remain neutral but, instead they decided to join. Some soldiers wanted to remain neutral. The
trigger for the war was the assassination of Ferdinand. The triple Entente and the Central Powers were fighting against each other in a war using the
trench warfare method. Imperialism was another reason for U.S. involvement. Their job was to make sure that Germany didn't defeat the allies. They
also had

November 11: France's Armistice Day
Parades go through the streets of France with flowers and memorials. The crowd is silent and weeping for those dead. Shops are closed and
houses quiet as the President comes forth to give a long speech for those lost. It's France's huge mourning day. Appropriate for the day, to honor
those who have died fighting for France, and a great happiness for the end of World War 1. November 11th has always been known as Armistice
Day. This holiday, also known as L'Armstice in France, has been honored and remembered every year since World War 1. On Armistice Day the
shops, schools and offices of France are closed. Instead thousands of people gather for parades and church services to honor those lost. Many
significant people including the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Austria declared war with Serbia, and Russia responded by declaring mobilisation. Russia tried to negotiate terms with Austria, but they wouldn't
comply. On August 1 of 1914, Austria declared war on Russia. Germany declared mobilisation on the same day as Russia did, and they already
had a plan known as the Schlieffen plan, which was to invade France and then turn and invade Russia. They decided that with their mobilisation
they would try to attack France. France disagreed to military pressure made by Germany and on August 3rd, 1914, Germany declared war on
France. The war continued for about 4 years after the declaration of war. Germany was prepared to go along with the previously made Schlieffen
Plan and attack France. The initial plan was to defeat Belgium and get to France, thinking Belgium would be an easy win. This proved to be quite
the opposite as Belgium put up an incredibly fierce fight despite it's small size. In addition to it's persistence Britain also helped to fight for Belgium's
neutrality in the war. This held up Germany for a little and it lost more troops than it was expected to. However Germany still stayed on schedule with
the plan. Britain's army that came to help was very small, but it was very highly–skilled. They were almost defeated by Germany many times, but they
managed to hold them off long enough that the French troops had time to arrive and help hold them off. On September 4th, the retreat of the French
and British troops was

Battle of Belleau Wood Essay
In March 1918, with nearly 50 additional divisions freed by the Russian surrender on the Eastern Front, the German Army launched a series of attacks
on the Western Front, hoping to defeat the Allies before U.S. forces could be fully deployed. In the north, the British 5th Army was virtually destroyed
by two major offensive operations, Michael and Georgette around the Somme. A third offensive launched in May against the French between Soissons
and Reims, known as the Third Battle of the Aisne, saw the Germans reach the north bank of the Marne river at ChГўteau–Thierry, 95 kilometres (59
mi) from Paris, on 27 May. Two U.S. Army divisions, the 2nd and the 3rd, were thrown into the Allied effort to stop the Germans. On 31 May, the 3rd
Division... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, the Marines failed to scout the woods. As a consequence, they missed a regiment of German infantry dug in, with a network of machine gun
nests and artillery.[7] At dawn, the Marine 1st Battalion, 5th Marines–commanded by Major Julius Turrill–was to attack Hill 142, but only two
companies were in position. The Marines advanced in waves with bayonets fixed across an open wheat field that was swept with German machine gun
and artillery fire, and many Marines were cut down.[9][10] Captain Crowther commanding the 67th Company was killed almost immediately. Captain
Hamilton and the 49th Company fought from wood to wood, fighting the entrenched Germans and overrunning their objective by 6 yards (5.5 m). At
this point, Hamilton had lost all five junior officers, while the 67th had only one commissioned officer alive. Hamilton reorganized the two companies,
establishing strong points and a defensive line.[11] In the German counter–attack, then–Gunnery Sergeant Ernest A. Janson–who was serving under the
name Charles Hoffman–repelled an advance of 12 German soldiers, killing two with his bayonet before the others fled; for this action he became the
first Marine to receive the Medal of Honor in World War I. Also cited for advancing through enemy fire during the counter
–attack was then–Gunner
Henry Hulbert.[12] The rest of the battalion now arrived and went into action.

The Events During The World War I
Introduction The First World War went down in history as one of the worst wars ever to be fought, owing to the magnitude of destruction and loss of
life it left in its wake. The war started in 1914 ending in 1919, and has been described variously as the ГЇВїВЅGreat WarГЇВїВЅ, ГЇВїВЅthe War of
NationsГЇВїВЅ and the ГЇВїВЅWar to End All WarsГ
ЇВїВЅ. (Dwight E, 1966) It was fought by many nations around the world, with Europeans being
the main players, and is very significant for the way it shaped the continents years after it ended. Many explanations for the possible causes of the war
have been given, some of which have been accepted while others have been disputed. The war was fought in a series of battles fought at different
locations at different times... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Dwight E, 1966) Secondly, at about the same time, the Scramble for Africa was taking place, and there was a myriad of conflicts among the various
colonial powers. The rush to acquire new territories led to enmity between the colonists over disputed regions. To make matters worse, the 1870 to 1871
war between the French and the Germans in which Germany won helped to foster distrust between the two nations. (Dwight E, 1966) Furthermore, the
feelings of nationalism among the nations were at their peak especially in BismarckГЇВїВЅs Germany. People were very eager to prove how strong or
important their country was and each felt superior in comparison to other countries. This nurtured hatred among the countries and made them eager to
go to war to prove their might. Another significant cause of the war is a set of alliance systems that had been put in place to prevent war. After the
Franco–Prussian war, a system of tangled alliances between European nations emerged. Some of the most famous alliances include BismarckГЇВїВЅs
Greater Germany, BritainГЇВїВЅs Splendid Isolation, The Three Emperors League and Dual Alliance of Germany, Austria
–Hungary and Russia, The
Triple Alliance consisting of Germany, Austria
–Hungary and Italy. There was a secret Franco–Italian Alliance, whereby in event of war, and Germany
attacked France, Italy would remain neutral. Other alliances included the Reinsurance Treaty between Germany and

Role of American Soldiers Essay
Running head: THE ROLE OF AMERICAN SOLDIERS
The Role of American soldiers during and after the Second Battle of Marne
Susan Byrd
University of Phoenix
THE ROLE OF AMERICAN SOLDIERS
The Role of American Soldiers during and after the Second Battle of Marne
In the beginning, World War Iwas considered to be "The European War"
During the beginning of the war, Americans had decided to remain neutral. Many Americans felt that it was not the United States' war to fight. Things
quickly turned around when America's ability to trade was compromised (Schultz, 2011). Another situation leading to the US joining the war was the
sinking of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The two main gases that used were Chlorine gas and mustard gas. These gases caused the enemy to drown in their own bodily fluid once exposed.
Using poisonous gases came with positives and negatives. The major positive was is caused major problems to the enemy. One of the major negatives
was that some of the troops would be caught in gas that was meant for the enemy (Bull, 2002).
Trench mortars were used to have a safe place to be protected while attacking or resisting an attack from the other side. Although it was not an actual
weapon itself, it was essential in survival of many troops on both sides.
Army tanks were first introduced during World War I (Bull, 2002). It was used to provide mobility and protection. Many of the tanks were equipped
with machine guns. The tanks were also used in order to extract injured soldiers from the battle zone.

The living conditions of World War I was horrible for soldiers. There were many different things that affected the troops. One of the major concerns
was the rats that were in the trenches. There were millions of rats located in the trenches with the soldiers (Duffy, 2009). The rats caused infection and
contaminated lots of the scarce food that the soldiers had (Duffy, 2009).
THE ROLE OF AMERICAN SOLDIERS
Soldiers would also become infected with lice during the war. Lice was a huge problem due to the dirty living

Imperialism In Germany
World War I, also known as the Great War, was a traumatic experience across Europe; the continent was in shock while experiencing the first total war.
During the late 1800s to early 1900s, industrialization was at its peak while the leading powers avidly extended their control through imperialism.
However, this golden age did not last long as alliances began to divide and create tension among leading powers. Militarism with a strong sense of
nationalism further led to Germany's invasion through Belgium and into Marne. As a result, the total war broke out on either side of Germany with
multiple nations involved including Russia, France, Britain, Austria–Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire. With this in mind, despite some believing that
the assassination... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In particular, after Russia and the Ottoman Empire ended the Russo–Turkish War with the Treaty of San Stefano, German Chancellor Bismarck
successfully annulled the treaty. Although Germany was dissociated with the war strictly between Russia and the Ottoman Empire, Bismarck claimed
that the unbalance of power Russia caused was unfair. This being said, Germany took the land that Russia gained away; Russia left the League of the
Three Emperors (an alliance between Germany, Austria–Hungary, and Russia). As a result, Germany and Austria formed the Dual Alliance of 1879
that stated, "Should, [...] one of the two Empires be attacked by Russia the High Contracting Parties are bound to come to the assistance one of the
other with the whole war strength of their Empires (Article I). Basically, if one of the two countries were attacked, the other would equally defend
them. Similarly, Russia allied with France when the Franco Russian Entente in 1894 which progressed into the Triple Entente when Britain became
involved. Evidently, Germany caused the division of world powers with their alliances which led to World War I. More specifically, when
Austria–Hungary went to war with Serbia after their archduke was assassinated, the two alliances clashed. Russia, who aided Serbia, had backup from
France and Britain and Austria–Hungary had Germany who was also allied with the Ottoman Empire. Seeing this caused both parties to declare major
war, Germany's alliances did cause tension that resulted in World War

Marne Turning Point
I am doing my paper on The first and second battle of Marne. The first battle was more important from a historical standpoint which I agree with
because it was a major turning point in the war. Some historians believe that if the allies hadn't won this battle they would've lost the war. I am going to
be writing about why I think the first battle of the Marne is the most important battle of World War One. Im going to start with some description of the
battle. Then in the end i will use evidence from my writing to why I think this is the most important battle of World War One.
After French commander in chief Joseph Joffre ordered an offensive in September 1914 General Michel Joseph Maunoury's French Sixth Army opened
a gap between Germany's First ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He decided to launch a diversion attack further south. This was to lure Allied troops away from the main attack in Flanders. These attacks were
Ludendorff's attempts to divide and conquer the French forces. The French were joined by about 85,000 troops from the United States as well as a
portion of the BEF (BEF were mostly in Flanders) and had hundreds of tanks ready. When the Germans began their advance after artillery
bombardment they found out the French had set up false trenches and artillery positions manned by very few defenders. The real front line of trenches
was further away and was barely scratched by the bombardment. The Germans had been deceived by French Commander in Chief Philippe Petain. The
Allies then formed a massive counter attack to end the German army for good.
I believe the Battles of the Marne are the 2 most important battles of World War One. The first battle was very important in keeping the French in the
war. And setting up a standstill for around 4 years. Without this battle I don't think the Allied powers would have won the war. France most likely
would have fallen if they wouldn't have held strong at the Marne. If France would've fallen many historians believe that the end of the war would've
been different with the Central powers on top. The second battle of the

The Schlieffen Plan Created By General Alfred Von Schlieffen
The Schlieffen Plan created by General Alfred Von Schlieffen in 1905 in WWI was believed to be a foolproof operation intended for German victory
over the French and Russian alliance by holding off Russia with minimal strength and swiftly defeating France by a massive movement through the
Low Countries. Failure of precise instruction led to Britain declaring war on Germany. The Schlieffen plan was an ineffective approach on the
Germans behalf as Britain, the rivalry country to Germany, had mobilized their troops to help France against Germany in accordance to the alliance
treaty withholding Britain, Serbia and Russia (Entente Alliance). There are abounding reasons of failure however time, direction and change come in
as the most logical to the argument. Timing had to be everything, using the Schlieffen Plan, the German army had to defeat France before Russia could
mobilize. The plan was made on the assumption that Germany would mobilize its units, send them to France and defeat France before Russia could
finish their mobilization. For this to result germany had to mobilize first, however during the war had Russia mobilized their troops first in response to
Austria–Hungary 's planned attack on Serbia. Now when the Germans began sending their men to France while Russia were close to finishing their
mobilization. So when the Germans were approaching Paris, the Russian's quickly attacked into Germany 's eastern front which was guarded by only a
few soldiers, since most

The First Use Of Vehicles During The U.s. Army
THE FIRST USE OF VEHICLES IN THE U.S. ARMY1
THE FIRST USE OF VEHICLES IN THE U.S. ARMY
USAACE
NCOA
SFC Francis C. League
15E SLC
17–003
SFC Maradol
THE FIRST USE OF VEHICLES IN THE U.S. ARMY2
Since the founding of the United States innovations and technologies have intermittently intersected providing critical direction in how we fight on the
battlefield. From breech–load cannons, fully automatic machine guns, airplanes, helicopters...to computers, night vision goggles, and lasers; each
exerted influence on the trajectory of modern warfare. However, arguably one of the greatest innovations that forever changed the battlefield landscape
was the advent of the motor powered vehicle. Motor powered ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
ARMY3
distance of one hundred and twenty miles on a tank of gas, (Model T Forum, 2010). This newfound speed to press an objective quickly could
decisively change an outcome of a battle.
In 1912, a forward thinking U.S. Army military leader, Captain Alexander E. Williams persuaded Quartermaster General James B. Aleshire, to approve
an elaborate off–road military convoy operations test, (FourbyFour, 2016). The test evaluated the viability of motorized trucks as replacements for
mules and wagons.
Captain Williams visited several factories; Ford, Mack, Aldcn Sampson, Garford, White and the little known FWD, seeing what trucks the companies
had to offer for the challenge. Of those companies only Mack, White and FWD fielded trucks that withstood the rigors of the exercise(s).
A subsequent test involved supplying a provisional regiment throughout a one hundred and fifteen mile march from Dubuque, Iowa to Sparta,
Wisconsin. And, although every truck that participated in the convoy broke down and needed repair at some point along the route, the exercise

successfully demonstrated that trucks had a future use and purpose in the U.S. Army. In spite of this achievement, Captain Williams's superiors were
reticent in their approval to move the Quartermaster (QM) Corps into the mechanized age. Over the coming years, the events of the war in Europe laid
the groundwork to the realities of

How Important Was The Battle Of Gallipoli
How significant was the Battle of Gallipoli?
The Battle of Gallipoli was a battle that had great significance in World War One. The Battle of Gallipoli was a struggle that took place in World War
One when British and Anzac forces tried to take a series of straits called the Dardanelles. The main purpose of this attack was to break through the
straits, Eliminate The Ottoman Empire from the war, and get troops and supplies to the Eastern Front where Russia had been fighting Germany all by
themselves. The first Allied troops to set foot at Gallipoli after a naval attack failure arrived on April 25, 1915. These troops will be the Allied side of
the uphill battle for about 11 months, starting from the first bombardment. As the Battle of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Only a select group of countries found any significance in it. Gallipoli is mainly celebrated in a small number of countries. one of said countries is
Turkey. Formerly part of the Ottoman Empire, Turkey celebrates the protecting of their land and home every year. The Ottoman Empire was seen
as a country that wasn't going to last long in terms of a war previous to the invasion of Gallipoli. Allied forces were not expecting to be there for a
whole ten to eleven months against small numbers of Turkish troops. However, Even though Turkish forces were few, they had the advantage of
terrain on their side. The Allied forces had inaccurate maps and charts that hadn't shown how rugged the terrain really was. Poor planning led to
the advantage of Turkish forces in the battles to come. The beaches that Allied troops had landed on were led into narrow paths which typically had
machine guns and other Turkish defenses posted in defensive positions that were able to keep Allied troops from gaining any more ground than
they already had. The Turkish people celebrate the overcoming of a seemingly superior force yearly and they hold great pride for the Battle of
Gallipoli. Another country to whom Gallipoli was of significance to was Australia. Australia was part of the Anzac forces in cooperation with Great
Britain at Gallipoli. Australia had made up most of the forces along with New Zealand. Australia hadn't really been recognized before Gallipoli was
launched in April of 1915.

Causes Of The Schlieffen Plan
The Schlieffen plan was made in 1905 by Alfred von Schlieffen. It took almost 9 years to devise the plan. He started making the plan in 1897 and
presented in 1905. After a year the plan was revised again (1906). The Schlieffen plan was a plan of attack for Germany, mobilization and war were
the same thing. The Schlieffen plan was also the only Germany's plan for war ("GCSE Bitesize: Extra Facts." BBC. BBC, n.d Web.). Some of the
reasons this plan failed was because. the lack of communication between the soldiers and their leaders and, the leadership that the leader led them
throughout the plan, the amount of assumptions that the Germans made during the plan and the bad planning of the plan and the resistance of the
Belgium army. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One time the lack of communication led The German infantry and cavalry had to wait days for resupply of food, ammunition and fodder for their
animals. This issue could have been solved in a lot easier way through may be communication between the food supplier and the German infantry
/army or through earlier planning for the food in advance and to talk to the supplier earlier. Another example of lack of communication was when
Helmuth von Moltke changed the plan. He dramatically reduced the number of troops that the plan required by 30% which didn't let the Germans
the ability of changing their tactics or strategy if the unexpected occurred as they lacked the number of troops that are necessary to do so (Mixon,
Jon. "Why Didn't the Schlieffen Plan Work?") I think that they could have solved the issue with more advanced planning and better communication
with all of the army and the leaders and solve their way throughout the issues that they were facing. The way they use to communicate throughout out
the plan was using pigeons and flags which was probably a very difficult way to send messages with a pigeon that the France army might see with a
note and shoot it. Or with weird flags at the grass trying to transfer a message for your army friends in a war

Immigration : The Gold Paved Road
1. Gold Paved Road– The gold paved road in our container is a symbol for the theme immigration. The gold paved road is symbolic of the
immigrant's beliefs of a better and more luxurious country that they would be able to make a life in compared to their home countries, much like the
luxurious nature of a gold paved road. Immigration relates to the theme of industrialization because of the horrible factory conditions that were
endured for low pay because of an immigrant's need for money in America. 2. Religious Cross– The religious cross in our container is a symbol for the
theme of expansion. The religious cross is symbolic of the faith that both the explorers and settlers had to have ingrained in their minds in order to
discover and develop the American west, much like how a cross is used to profess faith to God. Expansion relates to the historical impact of Native
American discrimination because of the newly discovered (westward expansion) land that was claimed by settlers and originally settled upon by Native
Americans, creating tension between the Native Americans and the white settlers. 3. Human Anatomy Diagram– The human anatomy diagram in our
container is a symbol for the theme of revolution. The human anatomy diagram is symbolic of the importance of the early American colonies coming
together to work towards the ultimate goal of independence, much like how the different parts of the human body have a purpose in the ultimate
function of living in the human body.

United States And The First International War
There have been several wars within countries itself and across the world, but there has only been one World War I or what some people may call
The First International War. This war had pitted the central powers of countries against each other causing alliances to form and having an
unbelievable amount of manpower need to fight over the years of 1914 to 1918. Most people around my age do not know anything about this war
due to the fact that it possibly has not been taught to them. However, the war consumed so many people in it because it was so violent. It damaged
those who were involved because there was no sight of the end after the first few months it began. Also, not all of the world's major powers joined
right away. The United States... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
But, with this event happening there were ideas of war from other countries already in mind such as Serbia and Russia who were quick to jump aboard
for each other and support the cause for Serbia that would give them an advantage to strike first. With an understanding of what was coming,
Austro–Hungary plan to declare war but, had to wait on the Germany to give an assurance of support. In addition, there was the development of Britain
prior to war of taking down the communication of their enemies to have an advantage:
British officials developed plans to wage information warfare prior to 1914. Members of the British government charged with contemplating the
defense of the empire studied international communications in 1891, in 1898, and again in 1911. They examined how to protect imperial
communications and how to destroy enemy submarine telegraph cable connections in wartime. (Winkler 848) With including that information some
can say that all war tactics were not about manpower or firepower but, to temporally take away the communication of their enemy especial Germany.
Then it happened, on July 28, Austria–Hungary declared war on Serbia and within a week, Russia, Belgium, France, Great Britain and Serbia had lined
up against Austria–Hungary and Germany, and World War Ihad begun "World War I History". When war was first started The Battle of Marne was
said to be the first turning point for Germany in which France and Britain took to the

General Chief Of Staff: Moltke The Younger
General Chief of Staff Helmuth Von Moltke, also known as Moltke the Younger, foreshadowed his own demise as well as that of the German Armies
upon his appointment to General Chief of Staff. Moltke fully admitted that his personal shortcomings and lack of self–confidence did not suit him for
the demands of the position . He lived in the shadow of his uncle, the great Helmuth Karl Bernhard Von Moltke, also known as Moltke the Elder.
Moltke the Elder, considered an architect of military victories that led to the creation of modern Germany , left a legacy for his nephew to follow and a
military leadership reputation to uphold. Moltke the Younger's mission command and leadership style left the troops of the great German armies
searching for ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This rapid turn of events thrust Motlke's forces into an unforeseen two front battle. The German Armies now had to fight the Russians on the right and
the French on the left. The British forces were yet another underestimation on Moltke's behalf. Germany assumed that the alliance between Britain
and France was merely words and did not expect the British Expeditionary Forces (BEF) to deploy and advance on the German Army in the manner
they did. When Moltke's Generals assumed operational control and diverted from the Schlieffen plan, it opened a gap in the German's offensive line
approximately 48km wide, allowing the BEF and the French fifth Army to flank the German troops. This decisive turning point denied Paris to the
Germans and forced the German Army back to the river Aisne where they repelled successive allied attacks from the shelter of the trenches . Finally,
Moltke's inability to retain control and communication with his Armies' Commanders led to a disjointed effort, enabling British and French forces to
break through critical gaps in the offensive line. Utilizing a system of decentralization, with Moltke based in Koblenz, almost 500 kilometers (km)
away, his Generals often did what they saw best, not always in the best interest

The Causes Of World War I
World War I was also known as the First World War or the Great War. It was an international conflict from 1914
–1918 that involved most of the
countries in Europe, the United States, the Middle East, Russia, and others (World War I). World War I had some major events like the sinking of the
Lusitania, The First Battle of Marne, and The Russian Revolution.
In 1900 the British Empire was spread over five continents, and France had control of large amounts of Africa. This created a fight between them and
Germany for land. Between the empires, militarism, and nationalism there was so much competition that it created a war. Militarism was a major cause
of World War I. The governments had given the military so much power that Germany, France, and Britain were in a major race to have the best
military that could claim and protect the seas around their country. Nationalism was also a huge cause of World War I because everyone believed their
country was best, which led to people fighting over whose country was better (Crocker).
World War I started after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand on June 28, 1914, and lasted until 1918. The assassination of Franz Ferdinand
was blamed on the Serbian government. In early July the Serbian government was convinced that Austria–Hungary was ready for war so the Serbians
ordered their Army to mobilize. On July 5, 1914, Austria Hungary got a secret alliance from Germany. On July 28, 1914, Austria
–Hungary declared
war on Serbia. Throughout

First Battle Of The Marne Chapter Summaries
The book starts out with an introduction that is a few pages long that includes information on the first and second Marnes attack, a map of the region,
explains what countries were involved at this particular time, key leaders, and provided some much needed background details pre–battle. It would
take the combined efforts of French, British, American, and two Italian divisions to defeat the German offensive. Chapter one starts out talking about
the First Battle of the Marne in 1914 and how successful the Allied forces were. The battle took place in the beautiful Marne River Valley, it was
known for its famous champagne and breathtaking land views. This First Battle immediately obtained an important status with the French and British
people because it was the largest battle ever fought, had more than 2 million men, and stretched more than 160 miles in length. It is said that,... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Neiberg wrote the Second Battle of the Marne that covers this specific battle that took place in World War I. The book offers great detail on the battle
with different points of view from all the countries that were involved. There are several diary clippings, commentary from several different
historians, and accounts of specific attacks and counterattacks that happened within the battle as well. To write the book Neiberg used several
primary sources, which enhanced the overall detail of the book. There were a few parts that were confusing in the beginning of the book where he
compares the First Battle of the Marne to the second and how the Armies and countries were different in their techniques, skills, and weaponry but its
hard to depict which battle he is talking about at times. Overall, I liked the detail in the chapters and that the author did add commentary and not just
fact after fact. I also liked the he focused on the French army and their leadership as well as the other countries to see how they all worked together to
finally end the

The Battle Of The Marne
Some would look at the second battle of the Marne as the turning point in WW1. It is fair to say that this battle's accomplishment did set the Allied
forces on an offensive that would see the end of the war in just 100 days after the offensive's end. Although this is a rock hard truth other factors
certainly contributed to the Allies push forward which eventually saw the end of the war. Consider this: the "Dough Boy" American forces had come
into the war fresh for fight at the time of the 2nd Battle of the Marne. Additionally the German forces did make several key tactical errors which aided
the tide of the battle. So what maneuvers and or intelligence could have swayed the way this battle went? As we take a look into this scenario I pose ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Paris was still a free area to the Allies and aside from that fact holding a great moral advantage it was also a key to war essential industry. Although
this was the case the area surrounding the Marne was very restricted both by the Germans and the Allied forces. Due to the first battle of the Marne
conductions were ideal for trench warfare which. This would be primarily what the 2nd battle would be. Additionally the Germans maintained
control of most northern logistic lines. As such it was difficult to get supplies to the troops on either the east or west flank of the Allies line. The
Germans also maintained hold of some of the railways in the area. This was a significant piece of key terrain as it restricted the flow of troops in and
out of the area. Due to the placement of the German lines (approximately 75 miles from Paris), they were close enough to conduct long range bombing
and air strikes on France's capital city.
As America was entering the war and it was clear there would need to be a strong spring offensive the Allies assembled a very intricate conceptual
plan of action comprised of three phases. They planned on first absorbing an assault from the enemy which would in theory tire the enemy and exhaust
some of their resources. Once the Allies accomplished this portion of the plan they would launch a counter attack in attempt to force the enemy forces
into a retreat. The three phases were the

1. First Battle of the Marne Soldiers of the 1st Battalion, Middle sex Regiment (Duke of Cambridge's Own) under shrapnel fire, 8 September
1914. Soldiers of the 1st Battalion, Middle sex Regiment (Duke of Cambridge's Own) under shrapnel fire, 8 September 1914. Q 51489 At the start of
the First World War, Germany hoped to avoid fighting on two fronts by knocking out France before turning to Russia, France's ally. The initial German
offensive had some early success, but there were not enough reinforcements immediately available to sustain momentum. The French and British
launched a counter–offensive at the Marne (6–10 September 1914) and after several days of bitter fighting the Germans retreated. Germany's failure to
defeat the French... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
General Sir Ian Hamilton decided to make two landings, placing the British 29th Division at Cape Helles and the Australian and New Zealand Army
Corps (ANZAC) north of Gaba Tepe in an area later dubbed Anzac Cove. Both landings were quickly contained by determined Ottoman troops and
neither the British nor the Anzacs were able to advance. Trench warfare quickly took hold, mirroring the fighting of the Western Front. Casualties
mounted heavily and in the summer heat conditions rapidly deteriorated. Sickness was rampant, food quickly became inedible and there were vast
swarms of black corpse flies. In August a new assault was launched north of Anzac Cove. This attack, along with a fresh landing at Suvla Bay, quickly
failed and stalemate returned. In December, it was decided to evacuate – first Anzac and Suvla, and then Helles in January 1916. Gallipoli became a
defining moment in the history of both Australia and New Zealand, revealing characteristics that both countries have used to define their soldiers:
endurance, determination, initiative and 'mateship'. For the Ottomans, it was a brief respite in the decline of their empire. But through the emergence
of Mustafa Kemal (later known as AtatГјrk) as one of the campaign's leading figures, it also led to the foundation of modern Turkey. 3.

The Hundred Days Offensive In World War One
World War One began in 1917 when Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated.
During the war, there were the Allies and Central powers along with the many battles included. The Allied countries such as Great Britain, France,
Russia, Italy, United States and Canada were opposing the Central Powers which were Germany, Austria Hungary,
Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria. The Hundred Days Offensive was a series of battles that led to the ending of the first world war. It led to a serious
advantage to victory in World War One.
Among the hundred days were many victories for the allied powers.
Generalissimo Ferdinand Foch took advantage of the disorganization of the German army and ordered a counter offensive. Following the
counteroffensive was the Second
Battle of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After this, Foch started plotting some amazing plans for attacks in order to defeat Germany. On September 26th, the American Army attacked in the
MeuseArgonne following by the British First and Third armies the next day that attacked eastwards towards Cambrai. Following that was an attack in
Flanders and the grand finale, the attack on the Hindenburg Line. These attacks were known as the four stage concentric offensive plan. These attacks
brought Germans to their breaking point and forced their own General Erich Von Ludendorff to seek for peace. A note was sent to theUnited States
president Woodrow Wilson which included the acceptance his
"Fourteen Points" for negotiations. Although it took many notes and discussions,
Germany finally signed an Armistice on November 11th, 1918.
Many battles were fought across the globe. Although The Hundred Days
Offensive wasn't a battle itself, it led many vicious battles which resulted to victory for the Allied powers and brought an end to World War One. This
was the "happy ever after" for the Allied powers. With great leaders and ambitious ideas for attacks,
Germans had no

The Causes Of The Great War

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Shauna Joy

More from Shauna Joy (6)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Causes Of The Great War