EM monitoring of CO2 sequestration

453 views

Published on

use of electromagnetic method in reservoir monitoring.

Published in: Education, Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
453
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
15
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • The transmitting fields are similar to that of induction log in well logging.
  • It is unfeasible to permanently deploy galvanic (conventional) electrodes owing to their continual electrochemical degradation, and the effects of changing groundwater content and temperatures in the near surface, which act to produce measurement artifacts. Terrains where other E-field sensors do not function well, such as desert, frozen tundra, gravels, and volcanic rock, etc.Regions where environmental invasion should be minimized and/or permitting is difficultCircumstances where fast cycle times, small crews, or minimal materials and gear are desirable, such as remote or distant locations, large projects, and for noise/sensitivity surveillance and characterization for feasibility studies and survey designApplications for which stability is critical such as time-lapse surveys and permanent or semi-permanent installation for continuous monitoring.
  • The experimental work to test an integrated EM acquisition, processing, and imaging system for the permanent monitoring, verification, and accounting of CO2 in deep reservoirs will be conducted in the Kevin Dome sequestration site located in northern Montana in collaboration with the Big Sky Carbon Sequestration Partnership.The goal of the BSCSP is to help identify the best approaches for permanently storing regional carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions
  • This is #D resistivity model prepared by authors from resistivity logs and other lithologs. And this is the proposed project site where co2 is produced naturally and transported 6 miles away to injection wells into duperow dolomite.Resistivity of 66 ohm-m without CO2 and of 100 ohm-m when CO2
  • This method overcomes the standard limitation of the conventional IE method related to the use of a horizontally layered background only. The new 3D IE EM modeling method still employs the Green’s functions for a horizontally layered 1D model. However, the new method allows us to use an inhomogeneous background with the IE method. We also introduce an approach for accuracy control of the IBC IE method. This new approach provides us with the ability to improve the accuracy of computations by applying the IBC technique iterativelyRead More: http://library.seg.org/doi/abs/10.1190/1.2358403
  • We can see here the increase in resistivity as the radius of co2 plume increase and hence 3d inversion of BSEM data could be effectively used tomonitor co2 sequestration.
  • EM monitoring of CO2 sequestration

    1. 1. Zhdanov M S, Endo M Presented by Saurabh wagh 10411033
    2. 2. Where do we sequester
    3. 3. How does it get stored  CO2 is stored in a supercritical state in deep saline reservoirs where buoyancy forces drive the injected CO2 upward in the aquifer until a seal is reached. It is stratigraphically and structurally trapped below an impermeable rock layer. Secondary mechanisms include a) Residual trapping of small amounts of CO2 in pore spaces, b) Solubility trapping whereby CO2 dissolves in existing formation fluids c) Mineral trapping - CO2 dissolves in the brine, forming a weak carbonic acid and over the time on reacting with minerals, into solid carbonate minerals.
    4. 4. Monitoring
    5. 5. Technique of monitoring  There is a strong correlation between the change in CO2 saturation and the change in water saturation in a saline reservoir.  Dissolved salts react with the CO2 to precipitate out as carbonates thereby decreasing the electrical resistivity.  As a result, there is a direct correspondence between the change in saturation and the measured electric field at the ground surface, which makes electromagnetic (EM) methods well suited for monitoring CO2 sequestration  Until recently, the seismic method was the dominant technique used for reservoir monitoring In this paper the authors have discussed a permanent electromagnetic monitoring technique using BSEM (Borehole to surface electromagnetic )
    6. 6. Why BSEM ? One of the main challenges in application of the EM method for reservoir monitoring is related to the fact that the target reservoir is relatively thin and deep.  Considering the diffusive nature of EM fields, it is difficult to accurately resolve movement of fluids at depth based on surface observations only. One possibility for overcoming this limitation of surface data acquisition systems is to place the source of the EM field in the borehole close to the reservoir, while keeping the receivers on the ground. This approach is implemented in the borehole-to-surface EM (BSEM) method that consists of a borehole-deployed transmitter, and a surfacebased array of receivers
    7. 7. Comparison
    8. 8. BSEM (Borehole to surface Electromanetic) In the BSEM method, the horizontal (Ex and Ey) and/or the radial components, Er, of the electric field are measured on the surface of the Earth These are excited by two vertical electric bipole transmitters (one electrode for each transmitter is located on the surface, while others are located above and below the target layer) with some specific frequencies in the range from 0.1 Hz up to 100 Hz. Er1 and Er2 are the radial components of the field generated by vertical electric bipole sources A0A1 and A0A2, respectively. We can then calculate a difference signal, ΔE=Er2 – Er1, which represents the response of the target reservoir. The Advantage of using a difference field, ΔE, for analysis and inversion of the BSEM data is based on the fact that in this field the effect of nearsurface geoelectrical inhomogeneities(such as borehole casing, nearsurface infrastructure, pipelines, other cultural EM noise,etc.) is significantly reduced.
    9. 9. Schematic view
    10. 10. Sensors CO2 sequestration encounters variations in formation resistivity and hence E-field as against B-field measurements would yield better sensitivity. For this purpose GroundMetrics developed and introduced a new type of E-field sensor named as ‘ecube’ that employs chemically inert electrodes that couple capacitively to electric potentials in the Earth. This coupling is a purely electromagnetic phenomenon, which, to the first order, has no temperature, ionic concentration, or corrosion effects, providing unprecedented measurement fidelity.  The sensor contacts the ground via an insulated metal surface which, under normal atmospheric conditions, forms a protective and selfhealing oxide.  This can potentially provide an operational lifetime of tens of years, even when exposed to extreme environmental conditions.
    11. 11. Sensors • These sensors could reliably achieve a sensitivity of 1 nV/m in 1second measurements at a frequency of 1 Hz, and a factor of two better at 10 Hz.
    12. 12. Computer simulation of the BSEM survey over Kevin Dome
    13. 13. … continued The authors have constructed a 3D resistivity model of the Kevin Dome from a lithologically-constrained geostatistical inter/ extrapolation from all resistivity logs available in the site. The model consists of 12 layers with the approximate resistivity range between 30 to 150 ohm-m. It is assumed that CO2 be injected in the Devonian Duperow (dolomite) Formation (target layer, approximately from 1110 m to 1140 m depth), where CO2 is naturally trapped, with a resistivity of 66 ohm-m without CO2 and of 100 ohm-m when CO2 is present
    14. 14. Modelling and Inversion of Simulated Data The synthetic BSEM data over this model by using a 3D EM modeling algorithm based on the integral equation (IE) method (Zhdanov, 2009) has been simulated Also a 3D inversion of this BSEM data was performed.  The inversion algorithm is based on the iterative regularized conjugate gradient method, which ensures rapid and robust convergence of the iterative process (Zhdanov, 2002). The forward modelling required for the inversion algorithm is done by the contraction integral equation method with inhomogeneous background conductivity (IBC), which allows for different discretizations within the different parts of the Kevin Dome model.  This is important because accurate modelling of the cased-borehole and nearsurface geoelectrical inhomogeneities requires fine discretization in those areas, while larger cell size can be used elsewhere.
    15. 15. Results  In the forward modelling simulation of the BSEM survey data,it was assumed that the geometry of the target reservoir is known from available well-log and geophysics data; however, the resistivity distribution within the target reservoir, which reflects the CO2 propagation, is unknown.  The results of 3D inversion show a comparison between the true resistivity model and the inverse model at the same depth of 1125 m for different stages of CO2 sequestration( i.e plume radius equal to 1000 m, 1500 m, 2000 m, and 2500 m, respectively).  The left panels in the figures show the horizontal slices of the true models, while the right panels present similar sections of the corresponding inverse models.  In these figures, the areas of CO2 propagation are manifested by increased resistivity in the inverse images. As one can see, the CO2 plume can be recovered well from these images  Thus, the 3D inversion of the BSEM data can effectively be used for EM monitoring of CO2 sequestration in deep reservoirs.
    16. 16. Results obtained from 3D inversion of BSEM data
    17. 17. Conclusion  The most widely considered approach to carbon capture and storage is the one based on storing CO2 in natural deep saline reservoirs.  An important problem arising in this case is monitoring and verification of the injection process and long-term geological integrity of the reservoir seal.  Thus, geophysical methods of reservoir monitoring should play a critical role in CCS process. In this paper it is demonstrated that EM methods, especially borehole-to-surface (BSEM) surveys, may represent effective techniques for monitoring CO2 injection in deep reservoirs.  Computer simulation has shown that BSEM data provide a clear indication of the location of the CO2 plume in the underground formation.  However, a practical field test is necessary for optimizing and practical evaluation of this technique. It has been planned to conduct a field experiment on the BSEM survey technique in the Kevin Dome sequestration site in the near future based on the computer simulations.  Also, a Recent BSEM survey conducted by Saudi Aramco for reservoir monitoring have been successful.
    18. 18. References He, Z., Liu, X., Qiu, W. and Zhou, H. [2005] Mapping reservoir boundary by borehole surface TFEM: Two case studies. The Leading Edge He, Z., Hu, W., and Dong, W. [2010] Petroleum electromagnetic prospecting advances and case studies in China. Surveys in Geophysics Hibbs, A. D. and Nielsen T. K. [2007] US patent application US12/000, 234. Marsala, A.F., Al-Buali, M.H., Ali, Z.A., Ma, S.M., He, Z., Biyan, T., Zhao, G. and He, T. [2011a] First borehole to surface electromagnetic survey in KSA: Reservoir mapping and monitoring at a new scale. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver Advances in Electromagnetics for Reservoir Monitoring by Strack, K.-M. http://www.groundmetrics.com/
    19. 19. Demontration of ecube

    ×