Resurrection Research Paper

Resurrection Research Paper
The state of one raised from the dead, the rising again to life of all the human beings before the final
judgment. N. T. Wright defines resurrection as being when "the present state of those who had died
would be replaced by a future state in which they would be alive once more.
From researching the resurrection the evidence is overwhelming; however the proof is the disciples,
telling the story of how each one of them saw Jesus alive and recorded what they had seen before
His death and after His death except. However, Thomas was not there.
The other disciples therefore said unto Thomas, we have seen the Lord. But he said unto them,
"Except I shall see in His hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails,
and thrust my hand into His side, I will not believe" (John ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
(Mark 16:4). That Jesus was raised from the dead. The angel who announced the good news, of the
Resurrection to the women gave four messages:
1. Don't be afraid, the resurrection should bring joy to us (Mark 16:6).
2. He isn't here, Jesus is not dead, he is alive in a believer's heart, we would never find Jesus among
the dead, unless he is quicking a dead spirit to life and bringing glory to GOD (Mark 16:6).
3. Come see, for the tomb was empty. Research tells me the tomb is empty even unto this today. The
Resurrection is a historical fact (Mark 16:6).
4. Go quickly and tell they were to spread the joy of the Resurrection. We are to spread the Good
News Resurrection if the key to the Christian faith (Mark 16:7).
Christian's were martyred, because they believe what they saw and believe in their heart no matter
what we must keep cling too the truth, willing to face persecution, imprisonment, torture and death.
Paul suffered persecution, beatings imprisonment and execution for his steadfast commitment of
Christ's
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Research Paper On Paul's Views On Life After Death
Paul's last major topic, is theologically the most important, which highlights the afterlife. In
addressing this topic, many Corinthians challenged Paul's teaching about the afterlife for various
reasons. One group questioned the necessity of a future bodily resurrection because they had
negative views of the physical body, making the concept of a future resurrection body undesirable.
Another group denied Paul's concept of bodily resurrection because they shared the Greek
philosophical view that a future existence is purely spiritual.
Nonetheless, to demonstrate that bodily resurrection is a reality, Paul brings back to the Corinthians
remembrance that Jesus rose from the dead. Paul further argues that if there is no resurrection, then
Christ

Religion In The Chronicles Of Narnia
Someone in today's day and age resurrecting from the dead is unheard of. Yes, there are some
unexplainable medical mysteries, but the only time we ever hear of someone returning from the
dead is in works of literature or art. Anytime a character is resurrected from the dead, it's alluding to
the biblical story, The Resurrection. The story is about Jesus who died on the cross for sins of God's
people and three days later rose from the dead in accordance with the scripture and God's word. It
was found that Jesus had risen from the dead, when two women walked to his tomb to find Jesus not
lying there. They walk back to tell the disciples what had just happened. Later in the story, Jesus is
recognized during the breaking of the bread. He shows ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He alludes to The Resurrection, in his work The Winter's Tale. During the story, King Leontes
wrongfully accused his wife, Hermione, and childhood friend, Polixenes, of adultery. He goes as far
as ordering the death of Polixenes, ordering his wife to be tried in court, and ordering the child
Hermione is pregnant with to be abandoned. After his wife dies, the King realizes his wrongdoings.
Sixteen years go by and suddenly a recently completed statue of Hermione comes to life, an allusion
to the resurrection of Jesus. In Act 5 Scene 3, the sculptor, Paulina says, "'Tis, time, descend, be
stone to more, approach". She continues to say "Bequeath to death your numbness, for him dear life
redeems you." Hermione then steps down from her pedestal and King Leontes says "O! If this be
magic, let it be as lawful as eating." This scene in the play alludes to John 20:14 "At this, Mary
Magdalene turned around and saw Jesus standing there", as well as John 20:18 "Mary Magdalene
went to the disciples with the news saying "I have seen the Lord". The simile "as lawful as eating" is
used by King Leontes after seeing Hermione come to life. This helps show the reader the King's
desperation for this so called "magic" to not be temporary or short lived. Shakespeare comparing it
to something as common as eating, he demonstrates the feeling of longing from the King, that he
has felt for so many years since the death of his

The Resurrection Of Christ Jesus
"The Resurrection of Christ Jesus according to the Apostle Paul"
The example in the Gospels can express many examples of resurrection which delivers a strong
message In the New Testament. The term resurrection by Webster definition explains, "Life,
raising from the dead." The Greek defines it as, "A standing up again, recovery." John 11:25
explain Jesus speaking to Martha concerning her Brother Lazarus's death. He says, "I am the
resurrection, (standing up again), and the life (breath), he who believes in Me shall live even if
he dies." There is much to contemplate when death and life have expression, as to stand up and
breath.
The commencement of this information will be organized in several parts to search and compare
a topics of this essay. Theologians give commentary to this topic as well and explain historical
content to understand. Many have believed Christ had not resurrected but was taken away and
buried. Some believed it to be a rumor to validate that which had been preached among the many
disciples. Eyewitnesses came forth to speak what happened and to solidify and cancel rumors.
The Apostle Paul converted to Christianity receiving a one on one account with the risen Lord
during his reign of terrorism in his day. My goal is to gather information to focus on the
comparison and contrast to the subject, "The resurrection of Christ".
To achieve this goal I have organized insight in three paragraphs, to include scriptures on eye
witnessed

What Is The Significance Of Resurrection To The Created World
TH501X2 Basic Christian Doctrine
Brian Edgar
Significance of Resurrection to the Created World
Requirement #4
April 24, 2015
Christie M. Berty
Around the world, every spring, in many different types of celebrations, millions of people
acknowledge that around twenty centuries ago Jesus Christ was raised from the dead; commonly
known as "Easter." Easter is a celebration of the significance of the resurrection of Jesus and it has
significance for the created world.
The origin of the word Easter is uncertain. It is commonly thought to come from the name of the
Teutonic Spring Goddess, Eastre [1]. Ēostre or Ostara (Old English: Ēastre, Northumbrian dialect
Ēostre; Old High German: *Ôstara) is a Germanic divinity who, by way of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The resurrection of Jesus from the dead is the foundation of the Christian system (cf. 1 Corinthians
15:14ff). Without the resurrection, Christianity would be a deception. However, the resurrection is
the certainty that all Christians should center their Christian experiences around. This being the
case, just what is the significance of Jesus' resurrection to the created world?
In this scientific age it is a challenge to believe in the resurrection of Jesus Christ. However, it was a
challenge to believe it even to the Disciples who were present. It is common knowledge and has
been common knowledge even in the first century that dead people stayed dead. So it is important to
examine the events that led the earlier followers of Christ to believe that He was resurrected from
the dead. As a frightened and discouraged group the Disciples did not expect His resurrection to
take place on Good Friday. In fact, it is not likely that they called the day Christ was crucified Good
Friday at all. N.T. Wright is the author of the book, 'The Resurrection of the Son of God' and he
makes an argument for the resurrection [5].
The Case for Resurrection
1. Resurrection was a Jewish belief among the Pharisees.
2. The followers of Jesus did not expect resurrection.
3. The tomb was empty
4. Jesus, in some form was seen by his followers after death.

5. By word of mouth the Christian Church spread rapidly in the Greek and Roman World reaching
Rome in 20–25 years even while

The Christ Foretold By Old Testament Prophecy
Hebrew 9:27 states, it appointed unto man once to die, but after this the judgement. Each and every
man, women and child has an appointment with death due to our sinful nature that separates us from
our Creator God. Due to sin, mankind therefore is hopelessly lost and separate from God. But God
put into motion a plan to redeem lost humanity back to him. Being eternal, the plan of God does of
course have a reasonable sequence; the decision to let Jesus die on the cross follows the first
decision to send him to the earth. God so love the world he sent his only begotten son Jesus to show
us the way back to him. Jesus made the claim that His death and resurrection fulfilled prophecy and
proved Him to be the Christ foretold by Old Testament prophecy. The main purpose of Jesus '
miracles was to confirm that His teaching was from God and His claims are accurate. When a
person has a message from God, it is important for an individual to decide whether or not this claim
was true. If a man could perform deeds that are impossible by natural law, people would then
recognize God was in working through that person and would thus believe in his teachings. In many
ways, the resurrection of Jesus is the greatest phenomenon that ever occurred, and is supported by
eyewitness testimony. It proves Jesus ' claims and teaching are true. Surely, God would never have
raised Jesus if He proved to be a false teacher and not who He claimed. The multitudes who heard
the Jesus

Explain Why The Tomb Was Empty
The workbook states that the most basic evidence was the empty tomb. "If the tomb was really
empty and no natural explanation can be provided for it, then Jesus did resurrect. Yet, many scholars
and nonbelievers actually agree that the tomb was empty, but object to the resurrection by stating
that there are natural explanations as to why the tomb was empty." However, I want to suggest three
more: First, Christ foretold His resurrection. The Bible accounts that, "From that time forth began
Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the
elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day" (Matthew
16:21). Although His disciples lacked the understanding of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For if the dead rise not, then is not Christ raised: And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye
are yet in your sins" (1 Corinthians 15:13–14, 16–17).
The Resurrection of Jesus is a testimony to the restoration or rebirth of humanity, which is a
fundamental principle of the Christian faith. Distinct from all other religions, Christianity by itself
holds a Creator who exceeds or rises above death and who assures that His followers desires the
same. All other religions were established by men whose end was the permanent eternal grave. As
Christians, we have consolation in the Truth that God became a man, died for our transgressions,
and rose from the dead on the third day. Death could not restrain Jesus Christ.
Despite where everyone stands on this matter, both Christians and atheists agree that the
Resurrection is vitally important to Christianity. Because, if the Resurrection were not true, we
would still be in our sins. Both believers and non–believers agree that if Jesus rose from the dead,
then we have a rational sensible case that the claims of Christianity are true. If Jesus did not rise
from the dead, then all of Christianity falls entirely and fails us

The Resurrection Of Jesus The Christ
INTRODUCTION The Resurrection of Jesus the Christ validates who Jesus was and is. Jesus has,
or had not been resurrected everything about Him is annulled. Furthermore, it invalidates who we
are as followers of Christ; the passage where this truth is emphasized more than any other is in
John's writing of his account of the Gospel with the foretold and predictions of the righteous,
unrighteous, and of Jesus' own resurrection; John 5:24–29 . If one was to look in the Holman
Christian Apologetic Study Bible (Holman 2003), they may see a note that is in reference and a
prediction (or prophecy) of this passage of scripture that deals with Jesus (a person whom has
already died an earthly death is in reference to Job) own resurrection, in which it is found in Job
(19:23–27); the Scripture says, "I wish that my words were written down, that they were recorded
on a scroll or were inscribed in stone forever by an iron stylus and lead! But I know my living
Redeemer, and He will stand on the dust at last. Even after my skin has been destroyed, yet I will
see God in my flesh. I will see Him myself; my eyes will look at [Him], and not as a stranger. My
heart longs within me." This critique and analyze the following passage of Scripture that will outline
the One whom is it that John is talking about (in the Gospel of St. John; chapter 5 verses 24 thru
29); who is it that Jesus is talking, who shall be "judged" (is the righteous or the unrighteous); who
is being addressed, and

Review Of Mccullough's Argument For The Resurrection Of Jesus
The four "facts" and subsequent points listed in this article, are the most convincing argument for
Christ's resurrection
1. After his crucifixion, Jesus was buried in the tomb by Joseph Arimathea.
2. On Sunday following the crucifixion, Jesus his tomb was found empty by a group of his woman
followers.
3. On multiple occasions under various circumstances, different individuals and groups of people
experienced appearances of Jesus alive from the dead.
4. The original disciples believe that Jesus was risen from the dead despite their having every
predisposition to the contrary.
Reading through these arguments alone, I believe are very compelling with regard to the validity of
the claims the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
The importance of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I think upon reviewing these they are good general principles, however, as to whether each of these
points have been satisfactorily meet is judged individually by the one review the material. To the
Christian mindsets, it is much easier to be convinced that all the areas outlined by McCullough have
been fulfilled. However, to the sceptic or critic these explanations may not hold the same credence.
Nonetheless. I do believe that the evidence set forth with regard to Christ's resurrection here and
elsewhere in insurmountable and also meets McCullough's six criteria.
It has great explanatory scoop – which means that it explains well why there was an empty tomb
and why so many claims have exist that Christ has risen from the dead and was seen by many
witnesses
It is great explanatory power – this means that it it sets forth why his body was never found despite
the fact that it well documented that there was in fact a execution
. It is plausible – This means that this makes clams. I believe this is one of the weaker points where
those who are skeptics would say that to believe that anybody could be raising dead is impossible.
However, Jesus life itself clearly demonstrates that He Himself performed many miracles and the
Bible itself support the existence of

‘Resurrection Is More Likely to Be True Than...
'Resurrection is more likely to be true than reincarnation.' Discuss
In discussing this statement, we must first define the words resurrection and reincarnation to
decipher what they mean. Resurrection is the act of rising from the dead or returning to life and
reincarnation is the rebirth of a soul in a new body. There are many problems surrounding the two
due to mainly religious beliefs. I will be focussing mainly of the religion of Hinduism as they
believe in reincarnation, and Christianity which believes in resurrection.
Reincarnation is a common belief in the eastern part of the world, with Buddhism as well as
Hinduism, supporting the idea of rebirth. In Hinduism each person has an essential self which is
called the Atman, and is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He wrote a book, 'Twenty cases suggestive of reincarnation', where he looked at cases where people
had seen to be reincarnated from someone else in the past from India, Ceylon and Brazil. He used
examples of children to make his judgement more reliable as they would not be influenced by
society or money in such a way that adults might. In one case there was a boy, Imad, who talked
about a family whom he used to live with, and the family had no connection to this other family at
all. He gave the name of where he lived and the family name, events and people that he knew there,
and could even direct them to the area of where he used to live. Stevenson later found out that a
man, Ibrahim, had died there and which matched up to all the events that the man had seen. The
reincarnation was not immediate but was nine years later. This extraordinary case gives strong belief
that reincarnation is true. However philosopher John Locke studied Steveson's book and suggests
that the dead person has left behinf some psycic traces or husks and therefore has a 'memory' of the
previous life, and is therefore not reincarnated.
Reincarnation completely goes against the teachings of many other religions, such as Christianity,
Islam and Judaism as resurrection is the key to their religion. Without resurrection there would be
no point to the religion. For

The Cornerstone of Christian Faith: the Resurrection of Jesus
The resurrection of Jesus Christ separates Christianity from all other religions. Christianity without
the literal, physical resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead is merely one religion among many.
"And if Christ is not risen," said the Apostle Paul, "then our preaching is empty and your faith is in
vain". (1 Corinthians 15:14) Furthermore, "You are still in your sins!" Paul could not have chosen
stronger language. (Mohler)
Still, the resurrection of Jesus Christ has been under persistent attacks since the Apostolic age.
Why? Because it is the central confirmation of Jesus' identity as the incarnate Son of God, and the
ultimate sign of Christ's completed work of atonement, redemption, reconciliation, and salvation.
Those who oppose ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For to this day the Manichees say that the resurrection of the Savior was phantom–wise, and not
real." (Hanegraaff)
Like the church fathers, the medieval church and the Reformation produced compelling confessions
concerning the bodily resurrection. Thomas Aquinas condemns those who "have not believed in the
resurrection of the body, and have strained to twist the words of holy Scripture to mean a spiritual
resurrection." the Westminster Confession assert: "On the third day he rose from the dead, with the
same body in which he suffered; with which also he ascended into heaven, and there sittith at the
right hand of the Father." (Hanegraaff)
Finally, the characteristics of Christ's body bear eloquent truth to his physical resurrection. Jesus
invited the disciples to examine His resurrected His resurrected body so that they would know
beyond the shadow of a doubt that it was the exact same one that had been fatally tormented. He
also ate food as proof of the nature of His resurrected body.
Jesus provided the final exclamation mark for His physical resurrection by telling the disciples that
His resurrected body was comprised of "flesh and bones." "Touch me and see;" He says, "a ghost
does not have flesh and bones, as you see I have" (Luke 24:39).
Those who would attack the Church and reject its gospel must direct their arrows at the most crucial
truth claim of the New Testament

N. T. Wrights Youtube Video: Death, Resurrection And The...
Death, Resurrection and the Afterlife: Death, resurrection and the afterlife have always been a topic
of debate. The resurrection of the body itself has been an even more discussed topic. In NT Wrights
youtube video, "Death, Resurrection, and the Afterlife" he discusses this very subject. He says that
this question is rarely mentioned in the Old Testament. In the New Testament this topic does arise
more often, but does not show a great significance. However, he answers these questions. What is
the importance of life after death during the time that Jesus lived? What are the teachings found in
the New Testament that relate to the resurrection of Jesus,? Why are the theological teachings of the
resurrection necessary and what is the portrayal that they Bible illustrates of a believer's death?
Also, how will the resurrection effect the earth and how do the teachings in the Bible about death,
resurrection and the afterlife differ from what most Christians believe today. NT Wright begins his
video with his explanation of Life After Death. NT Wright does not only believe in Life After Death,
but he believes in "Life after Life after Death. He explains this belief as a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The four gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John all focus on the Jesus's life; that include the
crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus.The purpose of this teaching is to continue the work that Jesus
Christ had begun while on earth. The apostles want to share the good news with world. As NT
Wright stated, they wanted to "work towards a loving, restorative and justice in the present world."
Because of the fact that no one in the First Century expected the Messiah to be crucified it was
imperative that they got this message out. Also, with the knowledge of Jesus and a new
understanding of the Old Testament they were better equipped to do this. Without this knowledge,
the theology of the Resurrection would be

Mark 3-35 Analysis
The three classifications are a direct and simplistic method for offering the initial evidence with
regards to the disciples being convinced in accepting that Jesus rose and appeared to them. "First,
we have Paul who claims to have known and fellowshipped with the disciples firsthand. He says
that they said it.
Second, we know of some very early oral tradition that was circulating within the church before the
New Testament was even written and points to the disciples saying it. Third, we have written
tradition that portrays or assumes the disciples saying that Jesus had appeared to them after He rose
from the dead."
When accepting or overlooking the New Testament, the debate for the resurrection needs to explain
its agreement with ancient ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although objections exist, the notion has been well accepted, along with the evidence that Christ,
indeed, resurrected from the dead. As the Apostle Paul states in 1 Corinthians 15:14, "And if Christ
be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain."
The resurrection account is one ingrained with rational analysis and textual affirmation or
authentication, in the worldview of an advocate of Christianity. Besides major resources featuring
eyewitness accounts of the resurrection of Christ, advocates are confident in the sacrificial deeds of
the apostles following the crucifixion of Jesus. There can be no more clarification for the
remarkable historic details that are accepted to be true except for the authenticity or evidence of the
resurrection. The Christian worldview holds authenticity in expressing worthiness of the
resurrection. With the death of the apostles as testimony, many are obligated to believe that Christ
did in fact miraculously resurrect from the dead enabling many to possess a hope

Jesus Resurrection Research Paper
Jesus' Resurrection is of paramount importance to the Christian faith and is a central component of
this belief system. The account of the Resurrection is so significant that "without it, there would
have been no new story to tell," however these notions of rising from the dead is not exclusive or
originate solely with the Christian faith. As this essay will explore, the Resurrection account in the
New Testament can be seen to be influenced by ancient stories and beliefs circulating at the time of
its composition. However, as the apostle Paul states in 1 Cor. 15:12–15, Jesus' Resurrection is key to
the beliefs held and identities of the Christian followers. Thus several traditional and important
features this key story will also be explored. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Jesus' identity as a Messiah was very different from the beliefs of the time and the Messianic hopes
of the various first century Jewish groups. This role, associated with violence and ferocity was
laughable to be associated with Jesus, who eventually died a painful and humiliating death on the
Cross. As explored by Wright, the Jewish nation as a whole at the time of Jesus' death believed that
their Messiah would not succumb to death and thus this turn of events was a very unexpected and a
surprise. However, this role as a suffering Messiah is what makes Jesus' Resurrection so different to
the myths of the time as the concept of 'gratuity' is evoked. Jesus resurrected as described by Alison,
is "entirely gratuitous" as Jesus is able to give something to us which is beyond our merit and
warrant. Jesus crucifixion at the Cross and Resurrection evokes the symbol of the Paschal Lamb at
the Passover, with Jesus acting as the Lamb, the sacrifice . Jesus dies on the Cross for us, complete
and pure, and this Cross is the ultimate symbol of his love and forgiveness for our sins as our own
path to God is unlocked. This important message and loving function of the Resurrection is unique
to Jesus' story and is not seen to be reciprocated in the tales of the ancient world. In Ancient
Mesopotamia the notion of people rising from the dead may have been a belief commonly shared,
however it was not associated with a greater cause done in a gratuitous fashion for humanity, rather
it was a power controlled by gods and goddesses which could be employed when they pleased as
they passed through the kingdoms of the dead and living. Thus, the nature of Jesus' loving
forgiveness during his Resurrection is a defining characteristic of this central Christian belief, as too
is the additional factor of the circumstances surrounding the empty

Critique On The Resurrection Of Christ : Theological...
Critique In our second article critique we have to critique an article about "The Resurrection of
Christ: Theological Implications" written by Daniel B. Wallace. Before getting to the content in this
article we must first talk some about the author. Daniel B. Wallace has taught Greek and New
Testament courses on a graduate school level since 1979. He has a Ph.D. from Dallas Theological
Seminary, and is currently professor of New Testament Studies at his alma mater. His Greek
Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament (Zondervan, 1996) has
become a standard textbook in colleges and seminaries. He is the senior New Testament editor of
the NET Bible. Dr. Wallace is also the Executive Director for the Center for the Study of New
Testament Manuscripts. In this article by Dr. Wallace he says that a number of Christians feel that
their gospel presentations should include simply the fact of Christ's death, but not his resurrection.
some go so far as to have a crucifix in their homes or around their necks with a corpse hanging on it.
Certainly such a picture elicits remorse and pity. But does it offer hope? Does it suggest that sins are
forgiven, or just that they are the cause of such a vile punishment, of the innocent dying in the place
of the wicked? He started his brief study by taking a quick look at the resurrection in the Old
Testament, followed by the resurrection of Christ in early Christian preaching. Dr.

Comparing The Afterlife In Hinduism And Christianity
Many religions differ in the way they believe a life will be after death. Hinduism and
Christianity both believe in an "afterlife" but in completely different ways. The Hindu term for an
afterlife is reincarnation. This is when the soul is eternal and returns into another physical body and
completes this cycle of life many times. Christians believe in a life after death in
Heaven. They also believe in the resurrection of Jesus and other humans throughout history. His
resurrection was after his crucifixion where he was said to be risen again and in the same body form
then ascended into heaven. Even though these ideas are very different there are still some
similarities with the concept of an afterlife.
First, what do the Hindus believe happens ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Hinduism, it is shown that this cycle never ends and everybody's soul will return forever unless
they gain spiritual insight to stop the cycle. The motive for this cycle is to gain complete spiritual
knowledge and learn more about meditative practices from the
Hindu religion only gods understand.
The first known reference of Hindu reincarnation was written in the Vedas, the ancient
Hindu scriptures. During the process of reincarnation, karma takes an important part in the soul.
Karma is essentially the good deeds and actions a person commits during his or her former lifetime
before they enter a new body. Everything in existence is considered to have two parts, the soul and a
body structure. The soul will never die and never change when the physical body structure does
throughout each new reincarnation. There is no lasting heaven or hell in Hinduism since after death
the soul will immediately retain a new form. However, if one has bad karma and no intention of
good deeds his soul can remain in hell for a short period of time but regain a new form in his new
life.
Resurrection is a term frequently used in the Christian religion. It is the basis

Does Jesus Rise From The Dead
Is Jesus God? Well, we can explore that in many ways. One of the ways that we can know if he is
God, is if we know whether not he rose from the dead. And from this paper I would like to address a
question, did Jesus truly rise from the dead? This paper will prove Jesus' resurrection by refuting the
objections of the reliability of Jesus' biographies and the swoon and stolen body theory, and by
evidence from the Bible. There are however many who disagree with this. We know that Jesus really
rose from dead.
One of the biggest objections of Jesus Christ's resurrection is that the biographies of Christ are
unreliable. There are four biographies in the bible; they are called the four gospels. There are four
gospels that consist of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Matthew was a disciple of Jesus, who wrote
his Gospels roughly twenty–five years after ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Jesus resurrection matters because it tells us that Jesus was a man of power who sacrificed his life
for me and you. In the book of John 19 it talks about the sentencing of Jesus' death, which then
leads to Jesus being placed on the cross. One of the major holidays that we celebrate is Easter which
is the celebration of Jesus resurrection, this shows us the importance of Jesus and his life. Once
Jesus died on the cross he was placed in the tomb and left there and guarded so that no one was able
to see him. Even though there are some non–believers and people that suspect that the resurrection
never happened, there is proof that it did by the bible verses and evidence that are presented.
Thirdly, the center of Christianity is the resurrection, if you get rid of that, then you lose
Christianity; so surely the early Christians did not make up the one thing that makes their religion;
there not going to fake the one thing that they believe in and die for it. Strobel

1 Corinthians 15: The Belief In The Resurrection Of Jesus...
Belief in the resurrection of Christ is essential to Christian faith. In 1 Corinthians 15, Paul makes
this point clear. Moreover, the chapter illustrates that through Christ's death and resurrection we
have been given victory over sin and death. Verses 1–10 are primarily concerned with the
resurrection of Christ and the grace given to the apostles to spread the good news. The resurrection
of the dead is addressed in verses 12–34. Finally, the passage closes (verses 35–58) with a
proclamation of the victory attained through Jesus' resurrection.
First, Paul seeks to prove to the Corinthians that Christ was raised from the dead. It is the foundation
of our faith. Therefore, no Christian should partake in denying this foundational truth. He applies
evidence from scripture and eyewitness accounts to prove that Christ's resurrection was far from
allegorical: ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Christ died for our sins, just as the Scriptures said. He was buried, and he was raised from the dead
on the third day, just as the Scriptures said. He was seen by Peter and then by the Twelve. After that,
he was seen by more than 500 of his followers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though
some have died.Then he was seen by James and later by all the apostles. Last of all, as though I had
been born at the wrong time, I also saw him" (1 Corinthians 15:3–8, NLT).
The apostle is adamant about confirming the account of the resurrection because believing that
Christ is alive is imperative. Without the basis of trust in this event, the Corinthians cannot approach
any other matter within Christian faith correctly. Essentially, anyone who denies that Jesus rose
from the dead will be unable to backup any other claims concerning

Comparing the Teaching on the Resurrection in I...
Comparing the Teaching on the Resurrection in I Corinthians and the Thessalonian Letters
The purpose of this paper is to compare the teaching on the resurrection of Jesus Christ as it is noted
in Paul's letter to the Corinthians and Thessalonian letters. The resurrection of Jesus Christ is one of
the primary doctrines of study in the Bible because it reveals the victory that believers have over
death, hell and the grave. However, the belief in a bodily resurrection has been the central focus of
controversy since the death of Jesus Christ.
So, before we begin with our comparison of Paul's teaching on the resurrection, we need to begin by
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, in order for us to understand the basic elements for a resurrection, we must consider the
following statement. "The spirit or the soul does not die, and therefore the spirit or soul cannot be
raised. Only the body can lie down in death, and only the body can stand up in the resurrection"
(McGee 396). This means that our body is only a temporary dwelling place because it will one day
give way to corruption. The main teaching of the early followers was of Christ dying for the sins of
mankind, and then being resurrected on the third day. So, in order to understand the difference
between the teaching on the resurrection in the letter to the Corinthians and the Thessalonian letters,
we must understand that the primary difference is not found in the reality of a literal resurrection,
but in the ones who will be resurrected. In I Corinthians chapter 15 Paul basically focuses on the
resurrection of Jesus Christ. This chapter is devoted to the understanding that Jesus was resurrected
in order to give believers victory over the powers of the grave. In I Corinthians 15 Paul tells us that
some people believe that Christ has risen, but deny the fact

The Bodily Resurrection Of Jesus
The bodily resurrection of Jesus was the turning point of history and is central to the sermons
throughout the book of Acts. To the apostles, the bodily resurrection was not an isolated event.
Instead, it could be considered as a "crowning seal to the whole unified revelation of God's
redemptive plan," Acts begins with a statement that Jesus "appeared to the apostles from time to
time, and he proved to them in many ways that he was actually alive"(Acts 1:3 NLT). Peter states
that being a witness of the resurrection was a fundamental qualification for apostleship (Acts 1:21–
22), so the resurrection assumes a vital place in the apostolic preaching. In Peter's sermon at
Pentecost, he says, "God raised him from the dead freeing him from the agony of death because it
was impossible for death to keep its hold on him" (Acts 2:24 NIV). Similarly, Peter refers to our
Lord as "this Jesus" whom "God raised up" (Acts 2:32). In later sermons Peter refers to Jesus as
God's "servant" whom he ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this case, biblical teachings emphasize the fact that God is eternal. Since Christ's bodily
resurrection serves as a foundational aspect of the Christian faith, it means that it represents the
abundance and eternity of life as prophesied. The bodily resurrection of Christ looks forward to the
future resurrection of every individual that believe in God (1 Corinthians 15:13–18). Last year I held
my dad's hand as he passed from this life. It was a sad moment, because I will miss my dad. And at
the same time, because of the resurrection of Jesus, I have hope. Death no longer is the end. The
resurrection of Jesus changed everything. The resurrection demonstrates that Jesus is the Christ who
fulfills Jewish prophecies (Psalm 16). The Psalm wasn't used to prove the resurrection, but rather
the messianic status of Jesus, which would have been crucial in delivering messages to the

Proof Jesus Resurrection
Valerie Wild
Instructor Christian Kettering
Philosophy 240–C01
7 April 2018
Proof of the Resurrection Jesus was raised from the dead can be proven. I have learned this from
reading the book The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus. All the points in this book are very solid
proof of Jesus resurrection. The book clearly provides evidence which leads me to this Bible verse.
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him
should not perish, but have everlasting life" (KJV, John 3:16). Jesus being raised from the dead has
good solid evidence that it happened. I have learned from the minimal facts approach that one can
solidly defend Jesus' Resurrection. These minimal facts are strongly attested ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
I think a main one would be that God does exist. If the Resurrection did not happen how could God
even exist. God was the one who raised Jesus from the dead. So, this gives evidence of God existing
in Heaven. Habermas and Lincona said, "The writers of the New Testament asserted that it was God
who raised Jesus from the dead" (136). Someone might say that science proves no one comes back
to life. Scientifically no one will rise from the dead due to natural causes. It is not implied that Jesus
came back to life naturally (Habermas and Licona 136). "The Resurrection is not an isolated event;
it occurred in an interconnected religo–historical context that helps to provide meaning, Habermas
and Licona said (136). If the Resurrection explains that God exists, then I believe also that this
means the Creation happened just as it says in the Bible in Genesis. Everything was created by

The Resurrection of the Dead
As with most other Pauline attributed documents, 1 Corinthians is believed to be a single document
that addresses salient topics and rationalizes Paul's view of faithfulness to Christ with Corinth
citizens. The newly founded church of Corinth was in correspondence with Paul requesting his
answers to questions they posed on topics ranging from marriage to the resurrection of the dead; the
latter being one of the most highlighted in 1 Corinthians. Paul's assurance of resurrection illustrates
a concern for Corinth as he admonishes their disbelief in resurrection of the dead with a series of
explanations as to why such doubt would render the faith of Christ "in vain". Given the context of
the time, Paul's correspondence with Corinth clearly ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Beginning as a direct rebuttal of Corinth beliefs regarding resurrection and eventually evolving into
a explicit and according to Paul irritable account of the events that lead to resurrection of the dead.
The passage showcases Paul's authority on followers of Christ and just how seriously his
understanding and beliefs regarding Christ were taken. Again as 1 Corinthians is in part a direct
address to his intentions in helping the church and part response to Corinth inquiries.The
Resurrection of the Dead passage Paul structures his response in a way that makes no room for his
commentary to be misinterpreted or ignored. Verses 12–19 are a clear formulation of taking
Corinthian rebuttals to resurrection and using their own phrasing to admonish their disbelief.These
verses are structured as a continuous unfolding of Paul's response. It begins in verse 12 with an
acknowledgement that some in Corinth do not believe in resurrection of the dead and then continues
on verse after verse appealing to that disbelief. The structure is a very much a "this, then this, then
this argument, mounting the consequences of not believing in resurrection of the dead on top of one
another until he reaches a conclusion that should cause all disbelief to vanish; if Corinthians do not
believe in resurrection then they cannot believe that Christ was resurrected and if they do not
believe that then their faith must be in vain.
Paul's intent is didactic and he utilizes

Essay about The Resurrection Validates Who Jesus Is
The Resurrection validates who Jesus is. If Jesus is not Resurrected everything about Him is
invalidated. Furthermore, it invalidates who we are as followers of Christ; the passage where this
truth is emphasized more than any other is in Paul's writing of First Corinthians 15:12–19:
Now if Christ is preached, that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that
there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there is no resurrection of the dead, not even Christ has
been raised; and if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is vain, your faith also is vain.
Moreover we are even found to be false witnesses of God, because we testified against God that He
raised Christ, whom He did not raise, if in fact the dead are not ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Jesus promised our enemy, the devil, and his destruction would begin with the defeat of his two
biggest tools sin and death. Death is the separation of man from God; God is Lord of the living. The
truly dead spend eternality Satan in Hell where he wants them away from God. Reese says;
He who perishes is forever separated from God, Heaven, and a blessed eternal life. His destiny is to
share the fate of Satan in the eternal torment of Hell. In the Word "perished" is involve all that
would follow if a man had no salvation, no atonement for sins. They will miss Heaven: they are
doomed, lost, damned.
If Jesus could not even be raised the dead, He would first be a liar and condemned to Hell. Secondly
there would be no one to prove that Resurrection is possible as Jesus claimed, then we would have
to assume that death is our destiny forever. Furthermore, this means no one would see Heaven
either, because we too would still be dead and the work that secured Heaven for us is left
uncompleted.
The saving work of Jesus that would free us from Hell was through His role as priest and sacrifice.
He was the sacrifice to free us from Hell's penalty. The shedding of blood the of the perfect
sacrifice, and pouring on the altar was the only way to pay for sin. When Jesus was on the cross, it
was as if, the lamb's blood was poured into the bowl waiting to go on the altar [or the ark], but there
was not a priest to apply it. Jack Cottrell in The Faith

The Resurrection Of Jesus Christ
Introduction: I came across an article on BBC news written on April 9,2017 that stated, A quarter of
people who describe themselves as Christians in Great Britain do not believe in the resurrection of
Jesus. To take the resurrection out of Christianity is like taking the heat out of fire, the darkness out
of the night, all the blood out of a man. Simply put, you cannot separate the resurrection from
Christianity. The resurrection of Christ is the hinge on which Christianity hangs. It is the foundation
of our faith. Yet there are many who try to refute this momentous history of the church. Josh
McDowell said, "The resurrection of Jesus Christ is either one of the most wicked, vicious, heartless
hoaxes ever foisted on the minds of human ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He was seen by the Apostles, and by over five hundred people at one time. It was inconceivable to
deny bodily resurrection if Christ was raised from the dead. Let's look at his argument.
V:12, Now if Christ is preached, that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you
say that there is no resurrection of the dead? Paul presents a dilemma to the believers at Corinth. On
one hand, Paul preached to the Corinthians that Christ has been raised from the dead and the they
believed it. Let's look back at what Paul says at the beginning of chapter 15:1–3,11. "Now I make
known to you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received, in which also
you stand, by which also you are saved, if you hold fast to the word which I preached to you, unless
you believed in vain. For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ
died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, according to the Scriptures,
and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures... look at what he says in verse
11, whether then it was I or they, so we preach and so you believed. Now they were buying into the
lie that there is no resurrection of the dead. They were inconsistent and illogical in their beliefs.
In verse 13 Paul's makes a simple point, if you deny the resurrection of the dead, then you denied
the resurrection of Jesus. Listen to what he says, "But

How Does Hume Support The Theories Of Resurrection
Resurrection is a Christian, materialist view that the body rises after death in a physical form, with
the main evidence of this being the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Resurrection is central to the
Christian faith as it marks the start of Christianity from the Jewish scriptures. There are many
differing views about the plausibility of resurrection. Some may believe that resurrection is only
based on theories, therefore not proved beyond doubt, and that these theories don't make sense.
Hard materialists such as Hume will support this view, saying that death is the end and the
decomposing body is evidence of that. However this opinion may not necessarily be true. The base
of many theories of resurrection is the bible, which suggests that ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He argues that this is logical as if the first two arguments are believable then the final one must be
too. St. Paul supports John Hick's theory that there is another spiritual world. He says it is a logical
argument, and uses a plant as evidence. Paul said 'when you sow a seed in the ground, it doesn't
sprout to life unless it dies'( 1 Corinthians V36) and 'God provides that seed with the body he
wishes; he gives each seed its own proper body'( 1 Corinthians V38). Likewise with a person – it is
a physical being and has the potential to become a 'mature spiritual person' in heaven in a replica
form with forces from God. This new body however, is different as it is immortal, non–physical and
higher up in the hierarchy below God and angles. This can be considered to be a logical conclusion
as it supports the view from the bible that we are 'a little lower than angels'. It is also logical as it
makes sense to suggest that a miraculous event such as this would come from an all powerful being,
and there is nothing more powerful than God. As the resurrected place is spiritual it is not subject to
the laws of nature, for example aging, so it is rational to suggest that they could be eternal as the
bodies are no longer in a physical world. Swinburne provides further evidence to support the
evidence of the bible as in his book 'The existence of God' he formulates the 'principle of credulity'
which argues that any experience should be trusted as

The Resurrection Research Paper
The resurrection in the gospel message is very important to any reader/believer. Its very important
for many reasons, first off the gospel would be incomplete without the resurrection. If Jesus walked
the earth and was the messiah, he was a healer, a sinless man, performed miracles, and taught about
the kingdom of God but then died then we would have no hope in the afterlife.
1 Cor 15:13–14 tells us "For if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ has not been raised
either. And if Christ was not raised, then all our preaching is useless, and your trust in God is
useless." So we must decide for ourselves if what we believe in is the truth or not, just examining
the fact we can see that Jesus has been raised from the dead, the tomb ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
But this is our God, He does the unthinkable, He can blow someone's mind off with His miracles,
and that's the kind of God I want to believe in. The kind of God where nothing in my life is too hard
for Him to take care of, the kind of God that either orders it or will use whatever's happened in my
life.
The resurrection is also important because it has accomplished four major things through out our
history and the Bible.
1.) the resurrection is the vindication of Jesus Christ righteousness. This means that to be just and
proven. In 1 timothy 3:16 we find that it says Jesus appeared in His flesh and was shown to be
righteous in His spirit.
2.) the demonstration of His power over sin and death. We learned that there are about seven
scriptures in the old testament that prophesied about the resurrection and tied with Jesus having
power over sin and death. All of these scriptures were then fulfilled.
3) the resurrection is confirmed by His deity. Hosea 6>2 it says that in a short time he will restore us
so that we can live in His presence. If there is no resurrection then every witness is a false witness.
Gods character would be called into

Theme Of Recalled To Life
A Tale of Two Cities (1859) is a novel by Charles Dickens, set in London and Parisbefore and
during the French Revolution. The novel depicts the plight of the French peasantry demoralized by
the French aristocracy in the years leading up to the revolution, the corresponding brutality
demonstrated by the revolutionaries toward the former aristocrats in the early years of the
revolution, and many unflattering social parallels with life in London during the same period.
Charles Darnay – A French aristocrat by birth, Darnay chooses to live in England because he cannot
bear to be associated with the cruel injustices of the French social system. Darnay displays great
virtue in his rejection of the snobbish and cruel values of his uncle, the Marquis ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
By this sacrificial death, Carton who has been leading a life of profligacy, is morally regenerated.
This moral regeneration or redemption is a kind of resurrection for him. Secondly, when Carton
conceives his bold plan to save Darnay's life, the words of the Christian Burial Service are echo in
his ears, "I am the Resurrection and the life, saith the Lord: he that believeth in me though he were
dead yet shall he live: and whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die." Carton had heard
these words at the time of his father's funeral, and these words now come to him as a promise that
the man who believes in Lord Jesus Christ never dies. These words echo in his ears when he is
actually going to be executed. Thus, Carton dies, feeling sure that he will find himself alive in
another world. Carton dies with the certainty of

The Resurrection Of Jesus The Christ
Introduction The Resurrection of Jesus the Christ validates who Jesus was and is. Stipulating
whether Jesus has, or had not been resurrected as the Scriptures proclaim entirety, and all that was
foretold, happened, and predicted about Him is annulled. Furthermore, it invalidates the Church and
more importantly Christians that are followers of Christ.
Introductory of John 5:24–28 – The passage where this truth is emphasized more than any other is in
John's writing of his account of the Gospel with the foretold and predictions of the righteous,
unrighteous, and of Jesus' own resurrection; John 5:24–29. Focal point of the Gospel of John and
seeing the life–giving power according to the Gospel of John; supposing if one was to look in the
Holman Christian Apologetics Study Bible the individual may see a note that is in reference and a
prediction (or prophecy) of this passage of scripture that deals with Jesus (a person whom has
already died an earthly death is in reference to Job) own resurrection, in which it is found in Job
(19:23–27); the Scripture says, "Oh that my words were written! Oh that they were inscribed in a
book! Oh that with an iron pen and lead they were engraved in the rock forever! For I know that my
Redeemer lives, and at the last he will stand upon the earth. And after my skin has been thus
destroyed, yet in my flesh I shall see God, whom I shall see for myself, and my eyes shall behold,
and not another. My heart faints within me! "
This critique

A Survey Of Related Literature
Status Quaestionis: A Survey of Related Literature As the study advances, it is worthwhile to note
that resurrection of Jesus is a topic widely discussed and has captured the interests of many
commentators in the span of four decades or so ago. Aside from the commentaries on the Gospel of
Matthew, several studies appeared on the resurrection of Jesus and some of them are described
below. The following sources are briefly discussed each according to the dates of their publication.
LADD, G.L. I Believe in the Resurrection of Jesus (1975). The work of G. L. Ladd provides a
strong historical argument for the bodily resurrection of Jesus in a brief but informative manner. His
work focuses on the interaction between historical evidence and faith and proposes the use of
inductive historical method rather than the "scientific" historical–critical method. Thus, he stated,
"We must first appreciate the importance of the doctrine of the resurrection. We must make clear the
problem of faith and history that so much colors the contemporary discussion. Then our primary aim
is to try to explain the rise of the resurrection faith." He also treats the Nature of the Gospels and the
Witness of the Gospels. The Nature of the Gospels is a brief treatment that sets forth Ladd 's
conservative conclusions on the dates and trustworthiness of the Gospels but consequently lays the
foundation for his evaluation of the Witness of the Gospels. Moreover, Ladd also

Resurrection Of Jesus Christ Research Paper
The resurrection of Jesus Christ
I do believe they was an resurrection of Jesus Christ, they are several scripture of the Bible that
reveal the resurrection of Jesus Christ and these scripture are Matthew 28:1–20; Mark 16:1–20;
Luke 24:1–53; and John 20:1–21:25. Also the resurrection was taken place in the book Acts (Acts
1:1–11). From these passages you can gain several substantiations that Jesus Christ was resurrect
from the death. First is the melodramatic change in the disciples. They went from a group of men
frightened and in hiding to strong, courageous witnesses sharing the gospel throughout the world.
The apostle Paul. What changed him from being a persecutor of the church into an apostle for the
church? It was when the risen Christ appeared to him on the road to Damascus (Acts 9:1–6). A third
convincing proof is the empty tomb. If Christ were not raised, then where is His body? The disciples
and others saw the tomb where He was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A key passage on Christ's resurrection is 1 Corinthians 15. In this chapter, the apostle Paul explains
why it is crucial to understand and believe in Christ's resurrection. The resurrection is important for
the following reasons: 1) If Christ was not raised from the dead, believers will not be either (1
Corinthians 15:12–15). 2) If Christ was not raised from the dead, His sacrifice for sin was not
sufficient (1 Corinthians 15:16–19). Jesus' resurrection proved that His death was accepted by God
as the atonement for our sins. If He had simply died and stayed dead, that would indicate His
sacrifice was not sufficient. As a result, believers would not be forgiven for their sins, and they
would remain dead after they die (1 Corinthians 15:16–19). There would be no such thing as eternal
life (John 3:16). "But now Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who are
asleep" (1 Corinthians 15:20

1 Corinthians 15: 1-11 Resurrection
The implications of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ are best discussed in 1 Corinthians 15:1–11 in
which we see the struggles of the Christians in the Greek city of Corinth living some twenty years
after the resurrection. They were afraid of being disembodied souls or spirits after death because
they had not embraced the Christian belief that human beings will experience resurrection to eternal
life. The apostle Paul addresses the Corinthians' confusion by proclaiming the absolute reality of
Christ's bodily resurrection. He reinforces the vital fact of the Christian faith as the resurrection of
Jesus Christ from the dead. If the story of the life of Jesus Christ had ended at the crucifixion, there
would be no good news to share, no bold church ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Paul's point is that if all we got out of Christ is a little inspiration for a few short years, if he was
only a good moral teacher, then there's no foundation for a church or religion. Christianity would
have just been a small blip in the timeline of world religions. If there is no resurrection, trying to
live a life of spiritual wholeness wouldn't have seemed worth doing or worth teaching to others.
Without the resurrection, every person who has ever lived would be hopelessly lost in sin and
without something to believe in. The hope inspired by the resurrection called people to the church
by giving them a reason to act morally and to trust in the teachings of the apostles. If Christ had
remained dead, then when we died we would remain dead and damned as the Bible says the reward
of sin is death (Romans 6:23). But Christ indeed has risen from the dead and "has become the first–
fruits of those who have fallen asleep" (v. 20), assuring that we will follow Him in resurrection. This
promised an afterlife for Christians and this motivated them to join the church to save themselves
and to convince the ones they loved to join as well. Both of these allowed it to spread and build
upon itself to be the world wide institution it is

1 Corinthians 15
The initial theme of 1 Corinthians 15 appears as a vivid narrative containing an important argument
about the resurrection. The resurrection causes warfare among the believers in Corinth. The
resurrection of Jesus from the dead is the one most important and the best established facts in all
history." The entire chapter of 1 Corinthian 15 is directed to the question of the validity of bodily
resurrection, as indicated in 1 Corinthian 15:12, "some among you say there is no resurrection of the
dead." In fact, the words for resurrection in their noun (anastaij) or verb (egeirw) forms are found 22
times in the passage (1 Corinthians 15:4 – 52). The entire chapter of 1 Corinthian 15 is directed to
the question of the validity of bodily resurrection, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, first–fruits are the initial quantity brought into the view as part of human being and we
cannot inseparable them from the whole resurrection account. We must be clear that the use of
metaphor by Paul was not fiction because the narrative of Jesus Christ die in the gospel is not
fiction. Christ is truly die and was raised from the dead. Yes we use metaphors or theories to explain
the significance of the death of Christ. This does not mean that the death of Christ is not really died
for our sins. Or did Jesus Christ really deals with our guilty. I believed that our worry about using
metaphor is not a fiction but use of metaphor happens to refer to event actually happened. The
resurrection of Jesus Christ is guarantee for us to the future bodily resurrection of believers. We can
just imaging the dawn glorious of Easter morning when our thought are turned to the resurrection of
our Lord Jesus Christ and how we appreciated our Father in heaven for the great plan of salvation
that has been provided for us freely that was our future bodily resurrection of believers will look
like. I think upon this point Paul's letter to the Corinthians has been primarily focus on the matter of
behaviors in

James 's Martyrdom As A Verifiable Origin For Information
James, the Half Brother of Jesus was Abruptly Transformed
There is not as much information about James as there is about Paul, but he is also significant for
the evidence offered, and another witness as well. The same reasoning can be utilized in regard to
James because his belief is that he actually saw a resurrected Jesus and that he was ready to die for
the identical belief as Paul and the other disciples. "James's martyrdom is attested by Josephus,
Hegesippus, and Clement of Alexandria. We no longer have any of the works of Hegesippus or the
writings of Clement where the event is mentioned. However, sections have been preserved by
Eusebius. Therefore, his martyrdom is attested by both Christian and non Christian sources." This
fact ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Here is where a resurrection appearance to James is discovered, leading to his transformation.
Actually, "most scholars' think this was the reason James became a believer." James, just like Paul,
offers concrete evidence of someone being transformed to Christianity, after what they believed to
be an appearance of the resurrected Jesus.
Skepticism of History and Other Explanations
Reports or events of the ancient past are labored with practical naturalism, which prevents the
discovery of miracles to be impartial historic evidence. Peter Kirby, the creator of
EarlyChristianWritings.com, asserts that, "Many scholars doubt the historicity of the empty tomb."
Robert M. Price believes that, "apologists love to make the claims ... that the resurrection of Jesus is
the best attested event in history," however "probabilistic arguments" demonstrate that "the
resurrection is anything but an open–and–shut case."
Robert Greg Cavin, a Philosophy and Religion lecturer at Cypress College, asserts that, "our only
sources of potential evidence, the New Testament Easter traditions, fall far short of providing the
kind of information necessary for establishing the resurrection hypothesis."
Bible researcher Geza Vermes examines this topic in the book, "The Resurrection." He assumes that
there are eight achievable proposals to

Jill Farrant Essay
Kennedy Knaul
Core 2 – Science Review 2 " I wrote in my diary about a plant that had died and came back after the
rain," Jill Farrant, a biology professor at Cape Town University in South Africa recalled. She
remembered stumbling across a resurrection plant at the age of nine and being amazed by its ability
to revive and seemingly immortal properties. Resurrection plants are able to "come back to life after
death", meaning they act and seem dead in a dormant state, but begin to revive within a few hours of
being watered. Naturally, being a farmer's daughter, plants were a life passion for Farrant.
Experiencing a dead plant reviving after a rainfall started her interest in resurrection plants. "The
dead plant on the rocks was alive but Dad ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"In the same way that humans have bred plant species together over the centuries to create oats,
maize, and wheat, so too can we breed desiccation–tolerant (the ability of an organism to withstand
or endure extreme dryness or drought–like conditions), drought resistant crops in the Eragrostis (a
family of perennial grasses) family without having to go the genetically modified route." She
explains that all plants have the genes that enable tolerance to periods with a lack of water, but most
only use them when they make seeds. Resurrection plants, however, can also switch these genes on
in their leaves and roots whenever water isn't available. In response to desiccation, the cellular
activity in resurrection plants can be summarized as: Dehydration –> Activation of desiccation
related genes –> Alterations in metabolism (Accumulation of protective solutes such as sucrose,
trehalose, and proline that stabilize proteins and cellular membranes. Production of antioxidant
compounds such as galloylquinic acids. Biochemical alterations in membrane and cell wall
composition.) –> Production of protective proteins ("dehydrins" and "expansins" that help preserve
the structure of the cell walls of the

John Stein's Account Of Jesus Resurrection From The Dead
The final chapter of Stein's book talks about Jesus' resurrection from the dead, his ascension into
Heaven and Christians waiting for his eventual return. This chapter describes the most important
aspect of the life of Jesus. It also tells various beliefs on why the accounts of Jesus' resurrection are
true and negates the claims on why he didn't rise from the dead.
The facts as are stated are that Joseph put Jesus in a tomb. The tomb was then sealed so that no one
could get into the tomb to steal the body. The last fact of the matter is that there were guards
guarding the tomb to make sure no one came to remove the body. There was an earthquake scaring
the guards of the tomb and they left to report it. Once the guards came back they realized ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Stein refutes these claims one by one. The first claim as to why he didn't come back to life is
because simply the women who witnessed that there was nobody in the tomb went to the wrong
tomb and just saw an empty tomb. Stein denies this by saying that this it had already been stated that
the tomb Jesus had been buried in was a well–known tomb and the women couldn't mistake it for
another. The nonbelievers claim that Joseph took the body, this could not be the case for two
reasons, one is that moving Jesus' body would be dishonor Jesus and the second is that the tomb was
sealed and under watch by guards. This is also the explanation Stein gives to the claim that the
disciples stole the body to fulfill the prophecy that Jesus had laid out when he said he would rise
from the dead. The last piece of evidence given by the non–believers says that Jesus actually didn't
die on the cross; he was only severely injured and had woken up after his burial in the tomb. Stein
negates this by saying that the Jews had used crucifixion before and were fairly good at doing so,
also they would have known a dead body if they saw

Analysis Of The Book ' Lament For A Son '
Stages of Grief
Introduction
The book, Lament For a Son, written by Nicholas Wolterstorff talks about his pain and grief after
losing his 25–year–old son (Joy, 2009). His son died while on a mountain–climbing expedition. Dr.
Wolterstorff has several books published during his career as a philosophical theology professor in
Yale Divinity. However, he wrote Lament for a Son with a different journal style since it is a
personal thing for him. The book is similar to a journal as he narrates the events that happened
before and after his son's death. The emotions expressed in the book are common among people
who lose close relatives. What matters is how a person handles the issue. Kubler–Ross invented the
five stages of grief; denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptancethat explain the escalation
of grief when stricken by bad news (Axelrod, 2004). The paper looks into the book and its relation
to the five stages of grief.
Question 1
As demonstrated by the five stages of grief, Dr. Wolterstorff suffers greatly emotionally as he deals
with his son's death. In a bid to settle his depression, he reads the Bible on similar experiences that
people had (Wolterstorff, 1987). He finds hope after reading and comprehending about Jesus Christ
life, death, and resurrection. The story gives him hope that one day his son, Eric, will resurrect one
day because God has the power to make such things possible. Dr. Wolterstorfffinally accepts the fact
that Eric died, but he will see him in

Resurrection Of Nazareth Research Paper
I. The second coming :Christ is now in heaven seated at the right hand of the farther as our exalted
prophet, priest and king waiting for the time appointed by y the father to return to earth. Three
Greek words –parousia (presence 1thess 3:13), apokalypsis (revelation, 2 thess 1:7–8), and
epiphancia (appearance, 2:8)– are used of this event in the NT. This coming will be nothing less
than the personal, visible, and glorious return of the same Jesus who ascended into heaven (matt
24:30, Acts 1:11, 3:19–21, Phil 3:20). It will be an event of which everyone on earth will be
abruptly aware for it will mean the end of things as they are and the universal recognition of the true
identity of Jesus of Nazareth (Note:The position adopted her ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
II. The resurrection of the dead: Christ himself rose bodily from the dead. His body was a real, yet
spiritual body and he is the "first born" from the dead (Rom 8:11, 29; Col 1:18) and the "first fruits"
of the resurrection of all believers (1Cor 15:20). The resurrection (Gr. Anastasis) of each and every
person who has ever lived is part of God's plan for the human race (Dan 12:2; John 5:28–29; Acts
24:15), but the resurrection of the wicked will be the beginning of God's judgment on them while
the resurrection of the righteous will be the beginning of their life in Christ in the fullness of the
kingdom of God. At the second coming of Christ, the dead will in their resurrection bodies; those
who are alive will find that their bodies are marvelously changed, even though they remain the same
individual persons. Little is taught in scripture concerning the new bodies of the wicked; but we
learn that the resurrection bodies of the righteous will be incorruptible, glorious and spiritual (1 Cor
15:35ff) and like Christ's glorious body (phil 3:21). Life in the new age of the kingdom of God in
the new heaven and earth will be everlasting, abundant life in an immortal body. The NT has no
doctrine of the

The Resurrection Of Jesus Is The Focal Point Of Christianity
Introduction
There is far reaching agreement among researchers today, over a wide religious spectrum, that the
resurrection of Jesus is the focal point of Christianity, asserted by conventional believers in light of
New Testament passages like 1 Corinthians 15:12–20; However, it is also declared by higher
analytical scholars, also. For instance, one of the current problems which face Christian theology is
that the resurrection of Jesus plays a decisive part. If the confidence and trust which are firmly
associated to the resurrection is in doubt, there is a risk of jeopardizing everything to which a
Christian clings. The explanation and narrative of the chronological basis of the Resurrection of
Jesus has been the focus of historical investigation and debate, as well as a theme of discussion
among theologians. The description of the Gospels, together with the empty tomb and the
manifestation of the risen Christ to His followers, have been observed as historic reports of a factual
event, as exact versions of prophetic encounters, as dishonest eschatological allegories, and as a lie
invented by early Christian authors, with numerous interpretations. It has been proposed, for
instance, that Jesus was never crucified, that there was an empty tomb because the body of Christ
was stolen, or that Jesus Christ was never in the grave.
"In Christian apologetics, no historical argument surpasses the resurrection of Jesus for its sheer
evidential force."
Despite the powerful robust

The Resurrection Historical Evidence
The resurrection of Jesus Christ can be seen as a highly argued topic. However, Perman's article,
"Historical Evidence for the Resurrection", does a magnificent job detailing and explaining evidence
of Jesus' resurrection that will make you a believer. When looking at evidence of Jesus' resurrection,
no other theory of what happened to Jesus can compare, and it is overall seen as the best
explanation. The historical grounds show solid truth that Jesus has risen from the dead.
There are three truths stated in the article that give the best explanations and prime evidence as to
how Jesus has resurrected from the dead. Although there are three truths, there is one in particular I
want to talk about. The truth I want to talk about is, "the tomb ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Men in this day and age were superior to women and it would be more likely that men would have
found Jesus' tomb if it were a legend. Knowing that Jewish women were the one's believed to have
discovered the empty tomb can be confusing to understand. At first, I believed that it did not make
sense that women would have found Jesus' body, because it would be much more likely and make
more sense that male's would have been the very first people to discover the tomb empty. Men
discovering the tomb would have been a normal outcome but the theory that women were the ones
with the discovery was unimaginable to happen, showing strong plausible evidence of why it is
actually true. Women were the least credible source and least trustworthy at this time so the fact that
they were the ones to discover the tomb is prime evidence to the resurrection of Jesus because they
were considered not believable. The fact that women were the ones to discover the empty tomb was
despised and went against all beliefs of believing women at this time which is why the information
deems to be

Resurrection Research Paper

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Sandra Campbell

More from Sandra Campbell (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Resurrection Research Paper