More Related Content
Similar to BCCF03B_Moran_NCCNbc22_v2.pdf (20)
BCCF03B_Moran_NCCNbc22_v2.pdf
- 1. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
NCCN.org – For Clinicians │ NCCN.org/patients – For Patients
NCCN 2022 Breast Cancer Congress
Radiation Therapy
Meena S. Moran, MD
Yale Cancer Center/Smilow Cancer Hospital
Locoregional Management of Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer with SABCS Updates
- 2. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
BINV‐2:
Modifications to
Local‐regional Management
- 3. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
8.2021
- 4. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Node+/high‐risk N0
s/p BCS + ALND
Poortsman P, Lancet Oncology 2020
WBI
WBRT + RNI*
Regional Nodal RT for “Higher Risk Patients”
• 10% N0 w/ high risk features
• ~50% had 1+ LN
• ~50% T1 (<2cm) tumors
• ~75% ER+
• Only 10% did not receive chemotherapy
• 25% did not receive HTWhelan T, NEJM 2015
*SC/IMN +/‐axilla
MA‐20
Node+/high‐risk N0 s/p
BCS or MRM + ALND
WBI or PMRT
WBRT/PMRT
+ RNI*
*SC/IMN +/-axilla
• 76% BCS, 24% MRM
• Medially/centrally N0 (pN0 44%)
• Chemo 25%,
• HT 30%
• Chemo + HT 30%
EORTC 22922
Poortmans P, NEJM 2015
Whelan T, NEJM 2015
- 5. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Results MA‐20 & EORTC 22922
10 yr Distant Cancer Free Survival 10 yr Breast Cancer Specific Survival
Whelan T, NEJM 2015
Poortmans P, NEJM 2015
Poortsman P, Lancet Oncology 2020
15 yr Breast Cancer Mortality
10 yr Isolated LRR‐Free Survival 10 yr Distant Cancer Free Survival
10 yr Disease Free Survival
HR 0.81 p=0.0055
HR 0.82 p=0.018
HR 0.86 p=0.020
HR 0.76 p=0.010
HR 0.76 p=0.030
HR 0.59 p=0.009
- 6. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Who Were The High‐Risk Patients
Included in these Trials?
• 85% N+ (1‐3+)
•<5% had 4+ nodes
•~10% N0 w/‘high‐risk’ features:
• pN0 w/ primary tumor >5 cm
• pN0 with Tumors >2 cm and <10
axillary nodes removed with >1
following:
• grade 3 histology
• ER‐negativity
• Extensive LVI
• 55% N+ with pT1‐pT3 tumors located in
the UOQ/LOQ of the breast
•45% were N0 patients :
pT1‐pT3 centrally or medially located
tumors
MA‐20 EORTC 22922
- 7. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
2022 Modification: Refining Patients in pN0 Cohort for
Consideration of RNI
- 8. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
2022 Modification: Refining Patients in pN0 Cohort for
Consideration of RNI
- 9. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
BINV‐2:
Modifications to 1‐3+ nodes after BCS
- 10. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
ACOSOG Z0011 10 yr. Outcomes
Primary Endpoints:
• Overall Survival
• Morbidity
• LR and nodal rec
*Protocol: Tangents only
10 yr LR recurrence: (p = 0.36)
6.2% ALND vs. 5.3% SLND
10 yr nodal recurrences: (p = 0.28)
0.5% ALND vs. 1.5% in the SLND
cN0T1/T2
Up to 2+ SLN
SLN → ALND → WBRT
SLN → ALND → WBRT
SLN alone → WBRT
SLN alone → WBRT
- 11. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
ACOSOG Z0011 10 yr. Outcomes
Primary Endpoints:
• Overall Survival
• Morbidity
• LR and nodal rec
*Protocol: Tangents only
10 yr LR recurrence: (p = 0.36)
6.2% ALND vs. 5.3% SLND
10 yr nodal recurrences: (p = 0.28)
0.5% ALND vs. 1.5% in the SLND
cN0T1/T2
Up to 2+ SLN
SLN → ALND → WBRT
SLN → ALND → WBRT
SLN alone → WBRT
SLN alone → WBRT
• Low burden of disease in N+
• No Mastectomy patients, only BCS
• Limited RT details
- 12. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
8.2021
- 13. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
SINODAR‐ONE Trial
Preliminary Results: SABC 2021
T1/T2 N1*(< 2+)
BCT or Mastectomy
ALND
SLNB alone
N=889
52 Italian centers
*Required macrometastatic
LN involvement (>2mm)
• 20‐23% Mastectomy
• RT details >75%
• Reported: Outcomes @
Median f/u 34months
5 yr projected
Gentile, D. et al SABC 2021
Outcomes ALND (n) SLNB (n) P value
Mortality 4 4 0.984
Ax Recurrence 1 1 0.489
IBTR 0 3 0.169
Distant recurrence 7 8 0.815
- 14. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
SINODAR‐ONE Trial
Preliminary Results: SABC 2021
Results: 5 yr RFS, OS reported
Analyzed by intention to treat and per protocol
No difference in RFS, OS Gentile, D. et al SABC 2021
- 15. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Patients Enrolled on SINODAR‐ONE vs. ACOSOG Z‐0011:
From: Gentile, D. et al SABC 2021
- 16. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Key Points SINODAR‐ONE:
The preliminary findings of SINODAR‐ONE confirm Z‐0011 findings:
• T1‐T2 patients with up to 2 macromets, no ALND is needed
• Regardless of whether axilla is targeted with RT, axillary event rare
In addition, this trial may allow for future:
• Broadening of criteria to include mastectomy pts (in addition to BCS pts)
• Deeper delve into RT treatment details to further guide RT field decisions
Need to further refine axillary RT fields for non‐Z0011
- 17. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Review of RT Breast Treatment Fields
• Z‐0011 protocol specified
“Tangents Only”
• 3‐‐field (intended to treat
SC/III AX nodes)prohibited
• Z11 was surgical study (No RT
QA)
• ? High tangent use?
• ? 3‐field use?
Standard tangent
Superior Border
High Tangent
Significant RT deviations
in subset analyzed:
• >20% used 3 field
• >50% high tangents
• Deviations in both arms
Ragsi, et al. JCO 3 Field Technique
Axial Projection En Face Projection
- 18. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
AMAROS =
After Mapping of the Axilla, RT or Surgery?
AMAROS
Donkers, Lancet Onc 2014
N=5000
•80% BCT 20% mastectomy
•Arms balanced
•Median SLN removed=2
•Median nodes removed(ALND)=15
Tumors <5cm, cN0
- 19. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
5 year (median 6.2 yr) publication:
• Axillary recurrences: RT 1.2 % vs. ALND 0.4% p=NS
• Lymphedema: 23% (ALND) vs. 11% (Ax‐RT)p=0.0001
AMAROS results:
Donkers, Lancet Onc 2014
10 year Abstract Only:
• Axillary recurrences: RT 1.8% vs. ALND 0.93% p=NS
• No difference in OS, DMFS or LRR
SABC, Donkers, 2019 Abstract GS4‐01
- 20. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
OTOASAR TRIAL
Optimal Treatment Of the Axilla: Surgery Or Radiotherapy
N=2,100
•~80% BCT ~20% mastectomy
•Median SLN removed=2
•Median nodes removed(ALND)=15
<
Savolt A, et al. Eur. J. Surg Onco 2017;43(4):672‐9
- 21. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
OTOASAR TRIAL
Savolt A, et al. Eur. J. Surg Onco 2017;43(4):672‐9
• No difference in ALND compared with SLNBx and RT to axilla
• RT to axilla is an alternative treatment to ALND in selected patients
• Majority of patients in AMAROS and OTOASAR had tumors <3cm and 1‐2+ nodes
- 22. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
2022 Modification: Refining Patients in pN0 Cohort for
Consideration of RNI
- 23. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Modifications to the
Definition of RNI:
BINV 2, BINV 3
- 24. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
8.2021
8.2021
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
- 25. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Node+/high-risk N0
s/p BCS + ALND
WBI
WBRT + RNI*
RNI for “Higher Risk Patients”
T, NEJM 2015
*SC/IMN +/-axilla
MA-20
Node+/high-risk N0
s/p BCS or MRM +
ALND
WBI or PMRT
WBRT/PMRT
+ RNI*
*SC/IMN +/-axilla
EORTC 22922
• Recommendation to ‘Strongly consider RNI with WBRT’ based on MA‐20 and EORTC 22922 which
demonstrated improved long‐term BC‐specific outcomes when RNI added to PMRT or WBRT
• Results suggest RNI (in select higher‐risk pts) results in ↓LRR , and affects distant breast cancer‐
specific outcomes
• RNI was defined in the 2021 NCCN guideline based on these 2 trials as supra/infraclavicular nodes,
internal mammary chain, and undissected axilla
- 26. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
KROG 08‐06
Study Question: Independent effects of IMN‐RT on DFS as a component of
RNI (when added to tangents + SC/Ax) after BCS or Mastectomy for pN+
Kim YB, et al. JAMA Oncology. 2021
T1-T3, N+
s/p BCS or Mastectomy
RT+*RNI+ IMN RT
RT +*RNI without IMN RT
Stratified by N1,N2, N3
& surgery type
N=747
- 27. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Korean IM study KROG 08‐06
• Underpowered to detect a Δ10% in outcomes
Subset analysis (unplanned):
• Patients with medial or centrally located
tumors had a 10% ↑DFS
• HR 0.42 (0.22‐0.82) p=0.03
HR 0.80 (CI:0.57-1.14 p=0.22) HR 0.81 (CI:0.56-1.16 p=0.25)
HR 0.87 (CI:0.57-1.31 p=0.50)
Kim YB, et al. JAMA Oncology. 2021
- 28. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
- 29. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Key Points:
• Large PIII trials (MA‐20/EORTC22922) have demonstrated a modest but statistically
significant improvement in the long term (10+ years) outcomes with RNI (which in these
studies included IMN chain)
• IMN RT associated with higher risk of heart/lung toxicity, thus its routine inclusion
remains somewhat controversial
• Appears the inclusion of IM nodes contributes to the benefits of RNI for N+
centrally/medial tumors
• The contribution of including the IM nodal chain to RNI in other subsets of patients
needs further refinement
- 30. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Key Points:
• When determining inclusion of the IMN chain with RNI, clinical judgement needed
• Patient selection should consider risks vs. benefits for IMN inclusion including:
• Long term cardiac and lung toxicities
• Existing/competing co‐morbidities of the patient
• Age/life expectancy
• Meticulous treatment planning observing normal tissue dose constraints is mandatory
- 31. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
BINV‐I4:
LR Management After
Pre‐operative Systemic Therapy
- 32. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
Local‐regional Management After
Pre‐operative Systemic Treatment
- 33. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
Local‐regional Management After
Pre‐operative Systemic Treatment
- 34. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
BINV‐D:
Axillary Staging Considerations
- 35. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
8.2021
- 36. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
- 37. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
kIn the mastectomy setting, in patients who were initially cN0 who have
pN+SLNB, and have no axillary dissection, RT to the chest wall
should include the undissected axilla at risk +/- RNI
- 38. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Major Shift in NCCN Treatment Algorithm
for Axillary Management
• Shift in paradigm for radiation oncologists for patients treated with cT1/T2, cN0 treated without
pre‐operative systemic treatment
• Contemporary data from AMAROS and OTOASAR now confirm no difference in long‐term
outcomes with either ALND or RT to the axilla this subgroup after BCT or Mastectomy, with less
morbidity with RT
• A reasonable approach to T1/T2 cN0 pts without pre‐operative systemic therapy is to forgo ALND in
patients with up to 2+ nodes after Mastectomy and use PMRT with intentional inclusion of the
axilla
• Considerations should shift away from classical thinking of ALND recommendations based on
‘estimated residual disease burden in the axilla’, and more towards careful patient selection for
ALND omission and inclusion of RT to axilla
- 39. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
BINV‐I:
Principles of Radiation Therapy
- 40. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
8.2021
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
- 41. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
age >50
s/p BCS
Invasive BC
<3cm, pN0
Primary Cosmesis End‐point:
3‐yr physician assessed moderate to severe
breast adverse effects:
Pts requiring PMRT,
RNI, boost or
chemotherapy were
ineligible
Agarwal, et al. Radiother Oncol. 2011 Jul;100(1):93‐100
Brunt AM, et al JCO July 2020
FAST Trial (CRUKE/04/015)
- 42. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Brunt AM, et al JCO July 2020
Mod/Marked Br Shrinkage Mod/Marked Br Edema
Mod/Marked Br Induration
10 Year Cum
LR 1.3%
FAST Trial (CRUKE/04/015): 10 Year Follow‐up
- 43. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
FAST Forward Trial
40 Gy in 15
(2.67 Gy fx)
27 Gy in 5
(5.4 Gy fx)
26 Gy in 5
(5.2 Gy fx)
‐Invasive cancers
‐Age >18 years
‐(pT1–3, pN0–1)
‐BCT or
Mastectomy
‐chemotherapy
allowed (NAC or
adjuvant)
• Breast or CW
• Protocol mandated
3D‐CT planning
Brunt AM, et al Lancet April 2020
Dose constraints (5 fx):
PTV: 95% of PTV should get 95% prescribed dose
V 8 Gy ipsilateral lung: <15%
V 7 Gy heart: <5 % and V1,5 Gy heart: < 30%
Dmax of < 110%
40 Gy in 15
(2.67 Gy fx)
27 Gy in 5
(5.4 Gy fx)
26 Gy in 5
(5.2 Gy fx)
- 44. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
• Local relapse: Non‐inferiority bt 3 arms (<2% in all arms)
• Patient & clinician‐assessed normal tissue effects:
• 26 Gy arm was equivalent to 40 Gy/15
• 27 Gy arm did worse than 40 Gy/15
• 26 Gy arm had less mod/severe toxicity overall than 27 Gy arm
FAST‐Forward Trial: 5 yr. Outcomes
Brunt AM, et al Lancet April 2020
- 45. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
- 46. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
- 47. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
8.2021
- 48. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
© 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. All rights reserved. These guidelines and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines, go online to NCCN.org.
- 49. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
CMF:
• CMF has been used with RT in both prospective & retrospective studies
• A large body of published data of clinical experience of CMF + RT delivered
concomitantly
Endocrine therapy:
• Multiple retrospective analyses of patients treated w/ET before, during of after RT either
from clinical trials or institutional experiences suggest no difference in outcomes or
toxicity
• Meta‐analysis (Li F, et al, Breast 2016)
Sequencing of Systemic Agents with RT (BINV‐I)
CMF/Endocrine Therapy
- 50. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
CMF:
• CMF has been used with RT in both prospective & retrospective studies
• A large body of published data of clinical experience of CMF + RT delivered
concomitantly
Endocrine therapy:
• Multiple retrospective analyses of patients treated w/ET before, during of after RT either
from clinical trials or institutional experiences suggest no difference in outcomes or
toxicity
• Meta‐analysis (Li F, et al, Breast 2016)
Sequencing of Systemic Agents with RT (BINV‐I)
CMF/Endocrine Therapy
- 51. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Capecitabine:
• CREATE X established the benefit of capecitabine for patients with TNBC and residual
disease after surgery in NAC setting
• Capecitabine is a known radiosensitizing agent with potential to ↑ cell kill/normal tissue
toxicity
• Capecitabine was not given concomitantly with RT in CREATE X
Olaparib:
• OlympiA trial did not include any patients who received olaparib and cRT
• Similar to other trials, protocol not designed to assess the safety data of this combination
w/ RT
• Ongoing small trial (RADIOPARP Phase I) combination of olaparib +RT for LABC or
metastatic TNBC
• Feasibility study; Small number of patients (N=24)
• Full doses not given (400 BID OlympiA and max dose 200 BID in 5/24 pts)
Sequencing of Systemic Agents with RT (BINV‐I)
Capecitabine and Olaparib
- 52. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Capecitabine:
• CREATE X established the benefit of capecitabine for patients with TNBC and residual
disease after surgery in NAC setting
• Capecitabine is a known radiosensitizing agent with potential to ↑ cell kill/normal tissue
toxicity
• Capecitabine was not given concomitantly with RT in CREATE X
Olaparib:
• OlympiA trial did not include any patients who received olaparib and cRT
• Similar to other trials, protocol not designed to assess the safety data of this combination
w/ RT
• Ongoing small trial (RADIOPARP Phase I) combination of olaparib +RT for LABC or
metastatic TNBC
• Feasibility study; Small number of patients (N=24)
• Full doses not given (400 BID OlympiA and max dose 200 BID in 5/24 pts)
Sequencing of Systemic Agents with RT (BINV‐I)
Capecitabine and Olaparib
- 53. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Sequencing HER‐2 Targeted Therapies and RT
• PIII trials that established the routine use of HER2+ agents did not assess the independent
contributions of sequencing RT
• Existing published data mainly on Trastuzumab….Lapatinib
• Some clinical data to suggest that anti‐HER2 +cRT may be radiosensitizing
• ↑ response rates in locally advanced, gross disease
Horton J, Int J Rad Onc Bio Phy 2010
• Cardiac toxicity (+cRT) from retrospective reviews suggest equivalence to historic controls
(Trastuzumab PIII trials)
• Published retrospec ve & small prospec ve clinical series →
• No difference in toxicities (skin/soft tissue, lung, esophagus, etc)
• Systematic review suggests no appreciable difference in toxicities
Mignot F, Rad & Onc 2017
• TDM‐1, Pertuzumab likely to be safe, though available data are much more limited
• Some sugges on of ↑ toxicity of cRT w/TDM‐1 & Pertuzumab to other sites (brain, GI) caution with
RT to other sites
• These recommendations pertain only to breast/post‐mastectomy RT
- 54. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
Sequencing HER‐2 Targeted Therapies and RT
• PIII trials that established the routine use of HER2+ agents did not assess the independent
contributions of sequencing RT
• Existing published data mainly on Trastuzumab….Lapatinib
• Some clinical data to suggest that anti‐HER2 +cRT may be radiosensitizing
• ↑ response rates in locally advanced, gross disease
Horton J, Int J Rad Onc Bio Phy 2010
• Cardiac toxicity (+cRT) from retrospective reviews suggest equivalence to historic controls
(Trastuzumab PIII trials)
• Published retrospec ve & small prospec ve clinical series →
• No difference in toxicities (skin/soft tissue, lung, esophagus, etc)
• Systematic review suggests no appreciable difference in toxicities
Mignot F, Rad & Onc 2017
• TDM‐1, Pertuzumab likely to be safe, though available data are much more limited
• Some sugges on of ↑ toxicity of cRT w/TDM‐1 & Pertuzumab to other sites (brain, GI) caution with
RT to other sites
• These recommendations pertain only to breast/post‐mastectomy RT
- 55. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022, All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, without first obtaining express written permission from NCCN®. Contact education@nccn.org with any questions.
NCCN.org – For Clinicians │ NCCN.org/patients – For Patients
NCCN Member Institutions
Who We Are
An alliance of leading cancer
centers devoted to patient
care, research, and education
Our Mission
To improve and facilitate
quality, effective, equitable,
and accessible cancer care
cancer care so all patients
can live better lives
Our Vision
To define and advance high-
quality, high-value, patient-
centered cancer care globally