Early Intervention Research Paper Criteria Exemplary Proficient Emerging Unacceptable Points Obtained Abstract (5 points) The candidate includes an abstract that provides an overview of the paper contents and conclusions drawn. The candidate includes an abstract that provides an overview of the contents of the paper. The candidate writes an abstract, but it is similar to the introduction. The candidate does not include an abstract in the paper. Introduction (5 points) The candidate provides an introduction to the topic; it covers key concepts and key sources to aid the reader in understanding the topic; and the introduction clearly aids the reader in understanding the connection of the topic to the foundations of Early Childhood Special Education (e.g. historical connections, principles and theories, relevant laws, policies, etc.); references are cited. The candidate provides an introduction to the topic; it covers key concepts that aid the reader in understanding the topic; and the introduction aids the reader in understanding the connection of the topic to the foundations of Early Childhood Special Education (e.g. historical connections, principles and theories, relevant laws, policies, etc.); references are cited. The candidate provides an introduction that is a brief statement on the purpose of the paper and little else; no references are cited. The candidate provides no clear introduction. Criteria Exemplary Proficient Emerging Unacceptable Points Obtained Literature Review (35 points) The candidate reviews key peer reviewed articles on the topic; the candidate provides a summary of important content from each piece; strong transitions provide connections between the pieces; the contents provide a clear and comprehensive view of the social issue in Early Childhood Special Education. The candidate reviews literature that are peer reviewed articles on the topic; the candidate summarizes each piece and includes transitions to connect the works described; the contents provides a clear view of the current social issue in Early Childhood Special Education. The candidate reviews literature that are peer reviewed articles, most of which are marginally related to the topic. The candidate reviews the literature from a variety of sources, not solely from peer reviewed articles; some literature is not appropriate for the topic. Discussion (35 points) The candidate discusses the topic in a comprehensive fashion and shares her or his thoughts on the subject; the candidate reflects on the literature in a cohesive fashion in the discussion, and proper references are included to the literature reviewed in the previous section. The candidate discusses ideas related to the topic; information is linked to the literature, and references the literature cited in the previous section. The candidate provides a short discussion with only one or two of his or her thoughts on the topic; no references are provided. The candidate provides no di ...

1. Early Intervention Research Paper
Criteria
Exemplary
Proficient
Emerging
Unacceptable
Points Obtained
Abstract
(5 points)
The candidate includes an abstract that provides an overview of
the paper contents and conclusions drawn.
The candidate includes an abstract that provides an overview of
the contents of the paper.
The candidate writes an abstract, but it is similar to the
introduction.
The candidate does not include an abstract in the paper.
Introduction
(5 points)
The candidate provides an introduction to the topic; it covers
key concepts and key sources to aid the reader in understanding
the topic; and the introduction clearly aids the reader in
understanding the connection of the topic to the foundations of
Early Childhood Special Education (e.g. historical connections,
principles and theories, relevant laws, policies, etc.); references
are cited.
The candidate provides an introduction to the topic; it covers
key concepts that aid the reader in understanding the topic; and
the introduction aids the reader in understanding the connection
of the topic to the foundations of Early Childhood Special
Education (e.g. historical connections, principles and theories,
relevant laws, policies, etc.); references are cited.

2. The candidate provides an introduction that is a brief statement
on the purpose of the paper and little else; no references are
cited.
The candidate provides no clear introduction.
Criteria
Exemplary
Proficient
Emerging
Unacceptable
Points Obtained
Literature Review
(35 points)
The candidate reviews key peer reviewed articles on the topic;
the candidate provides a summary of important content from
each piece; strong transitions provide connections between the
pieces; the contents provide a clear and comprehensive view of
the social issue in Early Childhood Special Education.
The candidate reviews literature that are peer reviewed articles
on the topic; the candidate summarizes each piece and includes
transitions to connect the works described; the contents
provides a clear view of the current social issue in Early
Childhood Special Education.
The candidate reviews literature that are peer reviewed articles,
most of which are marginally related to the topic.
The candidate reviews the literature from a variety of sources,
not solely from peer reviewed articles; some literature is not
appropriate for the topic.

3. Discussion
(35 points)
The candidate discusses the topic in a comprehensive fashion
and shares her or his thoughts on the subject; the candidate
reflects on the literature in a cohesive fashion in the discussion,
and proper references are included to the literature reviewed in
the previous section.
The candidate discusses ideas related to the topic; information
is linked to the literature, and references the literature cited in
the previous section.
The candidate provides a short discussion with only one or two
of his or her thoughts on the topic; no references are provided.
The candidate provides no discussion.
Criteria
Exemplary
Proficient
Emerging
Unacceptable
Points Obtained
Conclusion/
Summary
(5 points)
The candidate provides statements to conclude the paper and
suggest issues related to this topic that need to be considered in
the future; considerations for research in this area are discussed
in the conclusion or summary.
The candidate provides statements to conclude the paper and
suggest issues related to this topic that need to be considered in

4. the future in the conclusion or summary.
The candidate provides statements that marginally conclude the
paper in the conclusion or summary.
The candidate provides no conclusion or summary.
Writing/APA
(10 points)
The candidate provides proper headings in the paper, and the
contents flow logically; each section flows in a very organized
fashion that enhances the readers understanding of the topic.
Control of grammar, usage, and mechanics. Almost entirely
free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors.
Follows APA format completely.
The candidate provides proper headings in the paper, and the
contents flow logically. Mostly uses appropriate grammar and
mechanics. Almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and
grammatical errors.
Follows APA format with minimal mistakes.
The candidate provides proper headings in the paper, and, for
the most part, the contents flow logically. Word choice is
often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd. Sentences are
somewhat unclear; excessive use of passive voice. Contains
several spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors which detract
from the paper’s readability
Candidate marginally follows APA format but includes
numerous errors
The candidate is disorganized; no headings are included and
information does not flow logically.
Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific.
Sentences are unclear. Many spelling, punctuation, and
grammar errors make it difficult to understood content.
Lacks evidence of APA format within the paper.
References
(5 points)
Uses APA format. All 10-12 sources are within the last six (6)

5. years and from professional sources.
Mostly uses APA format. With majority of the 10-12 sources
within the last six (6) years and from professional sources.
APA format marginally evident. Does not fulfil the 10-12
required sources. Not all sources within the last six (years) or
from professional sources.
Lacks APA format. No evidence of 10-12 sources that are
within the last six (6) years or from professional sources.
1. Early Intervention Research Paper (100 points)
The purpose of the Early Intervention Research Paper is to
permit each student to review recent literature to develop a
knowledge base in special education and early intervention that
provides a substantive foundation for subsequent courses in the
licensure program. Each of the sections should appear as a
distinct part of your paper with headings for each section. The
paper should be written in APA style and typed (12-point font,
Times Roman Numeral recommended). The paper introduction
through summary should be at least 9 pages. For all sections of
the paper, use current (within the past 6 years) research based
journal articles. Do not use popular sources such as a
newspaper, Wikipedia etc. In addition, you may select two of
the following other resources for your references such as a
BOOK (other than the one used in this course, website of a
professional organization. Below are the guidelines for each
section of the research paper that will be evaluated based on the
SEEI Research paper rubric
Introduction: Begin with a clear and relevant discussion related
to the content included in the paper. This should grab the
reader’s attention
Foundation of Special Education/Early Intervention:
· briefly provide an overview of special education as an
intervention (preventative, remedial, compensatory) that

6. includes early approaches to providing services to children with
disabilities. Identify features of early intervention that are
theoretically or philosophically different from general special
education
· identify the salient features of early intervention (individually
planned, specialized, intensive, goal directed, family driven
etc). Identify components that were linked to general special
education and features that were designed to meet the needs of
infants and young children with special needs
· provide a narrative discussing the time line of special
education law and highlight legislation related to providing
services to young children with disabilities. What prompted the
change to include early intervention services?
· Identify issues related to the definitions and identification of
infants and young children including those from culturally and
diverse backgrounds
· Looking at contemporary history of special education service
for children K-12 identify the differences in meeting the needs
of young children with exceptional needs. Include a discussion
of the following principles: due process, FERPA, screening,
referral, eligibility and continuum of services. Consider how
these have evolved from the original Education of Handicapped
Children Act to IDEA.
Role of the family:
· Provide an overview of role families play in the education
system, specifically how families have impacted the
development of special education practices
· Identify specific factors educators need to be aware of when
working with families of young children
· Discuss the impact of the dominant culture and how culture
shapes the schools
· Describe the potential impact of differences in family values,
language and customs
Intervention:
· Identify intervention approaches that are the outcome of

7. evidence based scientific research. What trends are identified
in early childhood special education?
· What learning environments are appropriate for infants and
young children? How does the learning environment for infant
young child look different from a K-12 child?
Philosophy: Articulate your personal philosophy of special
education.
· What do you believe is the purpose of special education?
· What do you believe are the roles and responsibilities of a
special educator?
· What knowledge and skills does a special educator need to be
effective?
· How might personal biases effect teaching?
· What is the importance of family partnerships?
· What educational philosophy do you consider yourself aligned
with?
· What is the future role of special education?
Summary: Provide a succinct synthesis of topic discussed in the
four sections with concluding ideas.
Do not introduce new information.