11720171Chapter 9 Testing the Difference Betwee.docx

11/7/2017
1
Chapter 9: Testing
the Difference
Between Two
Means
• In Chapter 7, we compared to μ,
where one sample was drawn from one
population
• In this chapter, we’ll test the difference
between two samples drawn from two
populations
Testing the Difference
Between Two Means
Howard T. Tokunaga, Fundamental Statistics for the Social and
Behavioral Sciences © SAGE Publications, 2016
11/7/2017
2
An Example…

• Will people take longer to leave a
parking space when another driver is
waiting (“Intruder”) compared to when
no other driver is waiting (“No
intruder”)?
• Observational study with 15 drivers in
each condition (Ruback & Juieng, 1997)
An Example…
Intruder No Intruder
11/7/2017
3
• Bar chart
− One nominal variable as IV
− Bar height represents mean on DV
− Error bars represent 1 standard error of the mean
above and below the mean (± 1 s )
An Example…

An Example…
• Are the two groups different from each
other?
– Chapter 7: evaluated a sample mean using
a distribution of sample means (the
sampling distribution of the mean)
– Now: Evaluate the difference between two
sample means using a distribution of
differences between sample means (the
sampling distribution of the difference).
11/7/2017
4
Sampling Distribution
of the Difference
• Sampling distribution of the difference:
distribution of all possible differences
between two sample means when an
infinite number of pairs of samples of
size N are randomly drawn from two
populations
– Used to determine the probability of
obtaining any particular difference between

two sample means
Sampling Distribution
of the Difference
• Lets assume that two populations are not
different
• We randomly draw samples from each
population and calculate differences
between the two sample means
• Although we expect there to be no (zero)
differences between the sample means,
because of sampling error, we will get a
distribution of differences
11/7/2017
5
The Sampling Distribution of
the Difference: Characteristics
• Modality

− Mean = 0
• Symmetry
− Approximately normal
− Shape determined by sample size
• Variability
− Standard error of the difference
Inferential Statistics: Testing the
Difference between Two Sample Means
State the null and alternative hypotheses (H0 and H1)
Make a decision about the null hypothesis
Draw a conclusion from the analysis
Relate the result of the analysis to the research
hypothesis
11/7/2017
6
• State the null and alternative hypotheses
H0: µIntruder = µNo intruder

H1: intruder
hypothesis
11/7/2017
7
• Make a decision about the null
hypothesis
– Calculate the degrees of freedom (df)
– Set alpha (α), identify the critical values,
and state a decision rule

– Calculate a statistic: t‐test for independent
means
– Make a decision whether to reject the null
hypothesis
– Determine the level of significance
hypothesis
– Because we have two samples from two
populations,
df = (N1 – 1) + (N2 – 1)
= (15 – 1) + (15 – 1)
= 28
11/7/2017

8
hypothesis
• For α = .05 (two‐tailed) and df = 28, critical
value =
• If t < ‐2.048 or > 2.048, reject H0; otherwise,
do not reject H0
hypothesis.
− Calculate a statistic: t‐test for independent
means
11/7/2017

9
hypothesis
− Calculate the standard error of the
difference
hypothesis.
− Calculate the t‐statistic for independent
means:
t = 2.42
11/7/2017
10

hypothesis
hypothesis
t = 2.42 > 2.048 H0 (p < .05)
• For .01, critical value = 2.763
• t = 2.42 < 2.763 < .05 (but not < .01)
• Make a decision about the null hypothesis
11/7/2017
11

hypothesis
• Draw a conclusion from the analysis
– The mean departure time for the 15
drivers in the Intruder group (M = 40.73s)
is significantly greater than the mean
departure time for the 15 drivers in the No
intruder group (M = 31.67s), t(28) = 2.42, p
< .05.
11/7/2017
12

hypothesis
• Relate the result to the research
hypothesis
– “The present series of studies is consistent
with prior findings that people display
territorial defense in public
territories...What is new about the present
research is that it suggests people
sometimes display territorial behavior
merely to keep others from possessing the
space even when it no longer has any value
to them” (Ruback & Juieng, 1997, p. 831).
11/7/2017
13

• Assumptions of the t‐test for
independent means
– Assumption of normality: the distribution
of scores in the two populations from
which the samples are drawn are normal
– Homogeneity of variance: variance of
scores in the two populations is the same
• If the assumptions are violated,
researchers may make the wrong
decision regarding the null hypothesis
• However, the t‐statistic is robust
– Able to withstand moderate violations of
the assumptions
11/7/2017
14

Difference between Two Sample
Means (unequal sample sizes)
• Example:
− Researchers tested the effects of a healthy
living and exercise intervention on
kindergarten and first grade students’ (N1 =
16) ability to jump rope for 30 seconds.
They compared these scores to a control
group (N2 = 11) who did not receive the
intervention.
− Data from Matvienko and Ahrabi‐Fard
(2010)
Intervention (N1 = 16) Control (N2 = 11)
Means (unequal N)
11/7/2017
15

• State the null and alternative
hypotheses
H0: µIntervention= µControl
H1: µIntervention
Means (unequal N)
hypothesis
df = (N1 – 1) + (N2 – 1)
= (16 – 1) + (11 – 1)
=25
Means (unequal N)
11/7/2017

16
– Set alpha (α), identify the critical values, and state
a decision rule
• For α = .05 (two‐tailed) and df = 25, critical
value =
• If t < ‐2.060 or > 2.060, reject H0; otherwise, do
not reject H0
Means (unequal N)
Means (unequal N)
hypothesis
means:

11/7/2017
17
Means (unequal N)
− Calculate the standard error of the difference
Means (unequal N)
11/7/2017
18

Means (unequal N)
hypothesis
means:
t = 3.97
hypothesis
hypothesis
t = 3.97 > 2.060 H0 (p < .05)
• For .01, critical value = 2.787
• t = 3.97 > 2.787 < .01
Means (unequal N)
11/7/2017

19
Means (unequal N)
• Draw a conclusion from the analysis
– The average number of rope jumps in 30
seconds is significantly greater for the 16
students who received the intervention (M
= 27.31) than for the 11 students in the
Control group who did not receive the
intervention (M = 11.91), t(25) = 3.97, p <
.01.
Means (unequal N)
11/7/2017
20

hypothesis
– “This finding suggests that programs
emphasizing the enhancement of basic
motor skills that children apply in a variety
of games and sports may be an effective
approach to increasing overall activity and
fitness levels of young children” (Matvienko
& Ahrabi‐Fard, 2010, p. 303).
Means (unequal N)
Testing the Difference
Between Two Sample Means
• In the examples we’ve discussed so far,
we’ve compared samples from two
different populations
• These would be considered between‐
subjects research designs
– Each participant appears in only one group

11/7/2017
21
Difference between Paired Means
• Within‐subjects research designs test
differences (or change) within the same
participant
– Differences within a person regarding
different situations
– Repeated administrations (longitudinal
designs)
– Pre‐test – post‐test design
• Example:
− A sample of 20 parents were tested on
their knowledge of childhood depression
and anxiety. Three weeks later, following a
web‐based program, the same parents
were re‐tested on their knowledge
− Data from Deitz et al. (2009)

11/7/2017
22
Pre‐test Post‐test
• Consequences of the same people
appearing in both conditions
– We explicitly identify the paired data by
calculating a difference between the two
scores
11/7/2017
23

• State the null and the alternative
hypotheses
H0: µD = 0
H1: µD
µD: Mean difference between the two scores
µD = 0 is the same as µPre‐test = µPost‐test
11/7/2017
24
hypothesis

df = (ND – 1)
= (20 – 1)
= 19
hypothesis
• For α = .05 (two‐tailed) and df = 19, critical value
=
• If t < ‐2.093 or > 2.093, reject H0; otherwise, do
not reject H0
11/7/2017
25

hypothesis
− Calculate a statistic: t‐test for dependent
means:
hypothesis
− Calculate standard error of the difference
scores:
11/7/2017
26
hypothesis

− Calculate t‐statistic for dependent means
hypothesis
hypothesis
t = ‐5.77 < H0 (p < .05)
• For .01, critical value for t = ‐2.861
• t = ‐5.77 < < .01
11/7/2017
27

• Draw a conclusion from the analysis:
– The average knowledge scores for the 20
parents were significantly higher after
completing the web‐based intervention
program (M = 21.15) than before
beginning the program (M = 15.55), t(19) =
‐5.77, p < .01.
11/7/2017
28
hypothesis
– “These findings indicate that the program
can be an effective intervention for
improving parents’ knowledge of children’s
mental health problems and boost their
confidence in handling such issues …The
study findings lend support to the growing
literature on the utility of offering web‐
based programs to improve the health of
the general population” (Dietz et al, 2009,
p. 492).

• Assumptions of the t‐test for
dependent means
– Assumption of normality
• Larger sample sizes make meeting this
assumption more likely
11/7/2017
29
Looking Ahead
• In this chapter, we explored the process of
hypothesis testing using a situation slightly
more complicated than those presented in
earlier chapters. However, we still use the
same basic steps in hypothesis testing.
• Because we must rely on probability, there
exists the possibility that the decision made
about the null hypothesis may be in error. The
next chapter discusses these errors in greater
detail, as well as what researchers can do to
minimize the possibility and impact of making

these errors.
Title: Subtitle
Your Name

POLI 205
Dr. Frederick Wood
Month Day, 20Year
Write an introduction that tells the reader what your
research question is about and why it is important. This should
be no longer than the first page of your paper.
Literature Review
Describe what we already know about this question. This
section is not your evidence. This section is your opportunity
to prove that you know how other people have researched the
same topic and why you should be trusted by the reader. You
should use scholarly sources from JSTOR or Academic Search
Complete, which are available through the library’s web site.
You should not use blog posts or information from advocacy
groups or ideologues. This is also not an annotated
bibliography. You don’t write about how the article helps your
research. Instead you should state the findings of the previous
research. How it relates to your research should be obvious to
the reader.
Analysis & Assessment
This is the section where you are going to demonstrate
what you have learned in the class. I expect you to outline your
hypotheses, data collection, method of examination, and
describe your results in this section. You should use the data
from the SDA website. This is the most important section of
the paper. If your paper does not include a clear hypothesis test

with clearly identified independent and dependent variables and
the calculation of a test statistic with a conclusion, then you
will receive a 0 out of 100. Those who attempt an analysis, but
does it incorrectly, will receive a score of 50 out of 100. You
may not reference statistics generated by others. Only papers
that clearly demonstrate competence with the methods taught in
class will receive a passing grade.
Conclusion
Describe what your research allows you to conclude.
Answer the question posed in your introduction. Summarize the
entire paper in a paragraph but also talk about potential for
further investigation. Imagine what you would do if you could
build a statistical model where you can include multiple
independent variables.
Works Cited
Last, First M. 2012. “Title.”
Journal Title. Vol.(Issue): First –
Last page number.
Last, First M. 2012.
Book Title. Publisher: City, State.
Smith, Tom W, Peter Marsden, Michael Hout, and Jibum Kim.
General Social Surveys, 1972-2016 [machine-readable data file]
/Principal Investigator, Tom W. Smith; Co-Principal
Investigator, Peter V. Marsden; Co-Principal Investigator,
Michael Hout; Sponsored by National Science Foundation. -
NORC ed.- Chicago: NORC at the University of Chicago
[producer and distributor]. Data accessed from the Survey
Documentation and Analysis website at sda.berkeley.edu.

Please use:
http://www.apsanet.org/Portals/54/APSA%20Files/publications/
APSAStyleManual2006.pdf
You can also consult:
http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html
3

11720171Chapter 9 Testing the Difference Betwee.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to 11720171Chapter 9 Testing the Difference Betwee.docx

Similar to 11720171Chapter 9 Testing the Difference Betwee.docx (20)

More from robert345678

More from robert345678 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

11720171Chapter 9 Testing the Difference Betwee.docx