Ch02 (1)
- 1. Chapter 2 - Operations
Strategy and Competitiveness
Operations Management
by
R. Dan Reid & Nada R. Sanders
4th Edition © Wiley 2010
© Wiley 2010
1
- 2. The Role of Operations
Strategy
Provide a plan that makes best use of
resources which;
Specifies the policies and plans for using
organizational resources
Supports Business Strategy as shown on
next slide
© Wiley 2010
2
- 5. Importance of Operations
Strategy
Companies often do not understand the
differences between operational
efficiency and strategy
Operational efficiency is performing tasks
well, even better than competitors
Strategy is a plan for competing in the
marketplace
Operations strategy is to ensure all
tasks performed are the right tasks
© Wiley 2010
5
- 6. Developing a Business
Strategy
A business strategy is developed after
taking into many factors and following
some strategic decisions such as;
What business is the company in (mission)
Analyzing and understanding the market
(environmental scanning)
Identifying the companies strengths (core
competencies)
© Wiley 2010
6
- 8. Examples from Strategies
Mission: Dell Computer- “to be the most
successful computer company in the world”
Environmental Scanning: political trends,
social trends, economic trends, market place
trends, global trends
Core Competencies: strength of workers,
modern facilities, market understanding, best
technologies, financial know-how, logistics
© Wiley 2010
8
- 9. Example: Nokia
Nokia extended its already formidable dominance of the global
handset business on Jan. 24, announcing it had achieved 40%
market share in the fourth quarter of 2007. But perhaps the biggest
surprise was that the Finnish company achieved this long-promised
and psychologically important milestone while also becoming more
profitable.
http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/jan2008/gb20080124_974301.htm?chan=search
© Wiley 2010
9
- 10. Developing an Operations
Strategy
Operations Strategy is a plan for the
design and management of operations
functions
Operation Strategy developed after the
business strategy
Operations Strategy focuses on specific
capabilities which give it a competitive
edge – competitive priorities
© Wiley 2010
10
- 12. Competitive Priorities- The Edge
Four Important Operations Questions:
Will you compete on –
Cost?
Quality?
Time?
Flexibility?
All of the above? Some? Tradeoffs?
© Wiley 2010
12
- 13. Competing on Cost?
Offering product at a low price relative to competition
Typically high volume products
Often limit product range & offer little
customization
May invest in automation to reduce unit costs
Can use lower skill labor
Probably use product focused layouts
Low cost does not mean low quality
© Wiley 2010
13
- 14. Competing on Quality?
Quality is often subjective
Quality is defined differently depending on who is
defining it
Two major quality dimensions include
High performance design:
Product & service consistency:
Superior features, high durability, & excellent customer service
Meets design specifications
Close tolerances
Error free delivery
Quality needs to address
Product design quality – product/service meets requirements
Process quality – error free products
© Wiley 2010
14
- 15. Competing on Time?
Time/speed one of most important
competition priorities
First that can deliver often wins the race
Time related issues involve
Rapid delivery:
Focused on shorter time between order placement and delivery
On-time delivery:
Deliver product exactly when needed every time
© Wiley 2010
15
- 16. Competing on Flexibility?
Company environment changes rapidly
Company must accommodate change by
being flexible
Product flexibility:
Easily switch production from one item to another
Easily customize product/service to meet specific requirements
of a customer
Volume flexibility:
Ability to ramp production up and down to match market
demands
© Wiley 2010
16
- 17. The Need for Trade-offs
Decisions must emphasis priorities that support business
strategy
Decisions often required trade offs
Decisions must focus on order qualifiers and order winners
Which priorities are “Order Qualifiers”?
e.g. Must have excellent quality since everyone expects
it
Which priorities are “Order Winners”?
e.g. Southwest Airlines competes on cost
McDonald’s competes on consistency
FedEx competes on speed
Custom tailors compete on flexibility
© Wiley 2010
17
- 18. Competitive Priorities front & center
http://www.businessweek.com/magazin
e/content/06_13/b3977009.htm
http://www.businessweek.com/magazin
e/content/06_13/b3977010.htm?
chan=search
http://www.businessweek.com/technolo
gy/content/dec2007/tc20071228_10685
7.htm?chan=search
© Wiley 2010
18
- 19. Translating to Production Requirements
Specific Operation requirements
include two general categories
Structure – decisions related to the
production process, such as characteristics
of facilities used, selection of appropriate
technology, and the flow of goods and
services
Infrastructure – decisions related to
planning and control systems of operations
© Wiley 2010
19
- 20. Translating to Production Requirements
Dell Computer example – structure &
infrastructure
They focus on customer service, cost, and speed
ERP system developed to allow customers to
order directly from Dell
Product design and assembly line allow a “make
to order” strategy – lowers costs, increases turns
Suppliers ship components to a warehouse within
15 minutes of the assembly plant - VMI
Dell set up a shipping arrangement with UPS
© Wiley 2010
20
- 21. Strategic Role of Technology
Technology should support competitive
priorities
Three Applications: product technology, process
technology, and information technology
Products - Teflon, CD’s, fiber optic cable
Processes – flexible automation, CAD
Information Technology – POS, EDI, ERP,
B2B
© Wiley 2010
21
- 22. Technology for Competitive
Advantage
Technology has positive and negative
potentials
Positive
Improve processes
Maintain up-to-date standards
Obtain competitive advantage
Negative
Costly
Promotes dependency
Risks such as overstating benefits
© Wiley 2010
22
- 24. Measuring Productivity
Productivity is a measure of how efficiently inputs are
converted to outputs
Productivity = output/input
Total Productivity Measure:
inputs)
Total Productivity = (total output)/(total of all
Partial Productivity Measure:
Partial Productivity = (total output)/(single input)
Multifactor Productivity Measure:
Multi-factor Productivity = (total output)/(several inputs)
© Wiley 2010
24
- 25. Total Productivity: example
Bluegill Furniture makes kitchen chairs. The weekly
dollar value of its output, including finished goods and
work-in-progress, is $14,280. The value of inputs
(labor, materials, capital) is approximately $16,528.
What is the total productivity measure for Bluegill?
Total productivity = output/input
= $14,280/$16,528 = .864 or 86.4%
© Wiley 2010
25
- 26. Partial Productivity: example
Bluegill Furniture has hired 2 new workers to paint
chairs. Together they have painted 10 chairs in 4
hours. What is labor productivity for the pair?
Labor productivity = output/labor
= (10 chairs)/(2 x 4 hr)
= (10 chairs)/(8 hr) or 1.25 chairs/hr
© Wiley 2010
26
- 27. Multifactor Productivity: example
Bluegill Furniture averages 35 chairs/day. Labor costs
average $480, material costs are typically $200, and
overhead cost is $250. Bluegill sells the chairs to a
retailer for $70/unit. Find multifactor productivity.
Multifactor productivity =
(value of output)/(labor + material + overhead costs)
= ($70/chair x 35 chairs)/(480+200+250)
= ($2450)/($930) or 2.63
© Wiley 2010
27
- 28. Interpreting Productivity Measures
Productivity measures must be compared to
something, i.e. another year, a different
company
Raw productivity calculations do not tell the
complete story unless there are no major
structure differences.
© Wiley 2010
28
- 29. Interpreting Productivity Measures
Other productivity measure questions;
Is this partial productivity measurement
enough to make an investment decision?
Should you also look at productivity measures
for the two major competitors for comparison?
Productivity measure provides information
on how the firm is doing relative to what is
critical to the firm
© Wiley 2010
29
- 30. Productivity, Competitiveness, and
the Service Sector
Productivity is a scorecard
on effective resource use
A nation’s Productivity
effects its standard of living
US productivity growth
averaged 2.8% from
1948-1973
Productivity growth slowed
for the next 25 years to
1.1%
Productivity growth in
service industries has been
less than in manufacturing
© Wiley 2010
30
- 31. Productivity and the Service
Sector
Measuring service sector productivity is
a unique challenge
Traditional measures focus on tangible
outcomes
Service industries primarily produce
intangible outcomes
Measuring intangibles is challenging
© Wiley 2010
31
- 32. Operations Strategy Across
the Organization
Business strategy defines long-term
plan
Operations strategy support the
business strategy
Marketing strategy needs to fully
understand operations capability
Financial plans in effect support
operations activities.
© Wiley 2010
32
- 33. Review of Learning Objectives
Define the role of Business Strategy
Explain how a Business strategy is developed
Explain the role of Operations Strategy in
the organization
Explain the relationship between business
strategy and operations strategy
Describe how an operations strategy is
developed
© Wiley 2010
33
- 34. Review of Learning Objectives
Identify competitive priorities for of the
operations function
Explain the strategic role of technology
Define productivity and identify
productivity measures
Compute productivity measures
© Wiley 2010
34
- 35. Chapter 2 Highlights
Business Strategy is a long range plan and vision. Each
individual business function develop needs to support
the business strategy
An organization develops its business strategy by doing
environmental scanning and considering its mission
and its core competencies.
The role of operations strategy is to provide a longrange plan for the use of the company’s resources in
producing the company’s primary goods and services.
The role of business strategy is to serve as an overall
guide for the development of the organization’s
operations strategy.
© Wiley 2010
35
- 36. Chapter 2 Highlights
The operations strategy focuses on developing specific
capabilities called competitive priorities.
There are four categories of competitive priorities: cost,
quality, time, and flexibility
Technology can be sued by companies to gain a
competitive advantage and should be acquired to support
the company’s chosen competitive priorities
Productivity is a measure that indicates how efficiently an
organization is using its resources
Productivity is computed as the ratio or organizational
outputs divided by inputs
© Wiley 2010
36
- 37. Example: Detroit Edison
DTE's journey into the distributed-energy business began in 1994
when CEO Anthony Earley took over Detroit Edison. Convinced that
the utility industry was on an eventual collision course with customer
needs…Distributed generation soon became a strategic goal of the
company.
The idea behind distributed generation is that a school, hospital, or
office complex can produce its own power just as cheaply as it can
buy it from the grid. When rates go up, it can produce extra energy
and sell it back to the grid. When rates go lower, it can shut down its
generator and buy the cheaper electricity from the utility. This
approach allows customers to get slightly cheaper electricity from a
more stable source that won't suffer interruptions (which is especially
important to computer-intensive companies) and can flexibly meet
changing demands.
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2001/nf2001072_224.htm?chan=search
© Wiley 2010
37
- 38. Example: Nestle
Brabeck's other strategic goal is transforming Nestle from a set of farflung operations into a single global machine. He has inked a $200
million deal with SAP to link its five e-mail systems and permit
Nestle's headquarters in Vevey, Switzerland, to know for the first time
how many raw materials its subsidiaries buy, in total, from around the
world. The company then will be able to negotiate better contracts
with suppliers and centralize production. Last year alone, Brabeck
closed 38 different factories. All told, he has slashed $1.6 billion in
costs, without labor strife.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_24/b3736644.htm?chan=search
© Wiley 2010
38