Details of the research idea

1. Details of the research idea
Preparation :Rana Abdullah Tahan
PHD researcher
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1093-7740

2. o experimental methodology
o Foundation theoretical methodology
o Quasi-experimental methodology
o Case study methodology
o Survey methodology
o Ethnographic methodology
o Relational methodology
o Phenomenology methodology
o Causal methodology, comparison
o Narrative methodology
o Content analysis methodology
(quantitative)
o methodological content analysis
(qualitative
Implementation
status
Yes no
Evaluation sentence
Component
scientific
research
Incorporates search variables.
Title search
- Specific and clear, that is, without a boring abbreviation or
lengthening.
-Proportional to search content
Evaluation of University doctoral thesis
How I handled the research idea?(how I researched ‫؟‬
(
-WhyI chose thisidea over others?(why I searched(‫؟‬
-Outline your research idea in several lines(what did you research(?
Details of the researchidea
Quantitativeinput
Qualitativeentrance
o Why Ichosethesemethodologies
Did you write the research entry(chapter I) accordingtothe correct scientificstandardsin writing
scientificresearch?

3. - Not less than 250 words and not more than 300 words.
-Abstract search
- Contains the primary goal of research
-It contains a comprehensive overview of the research sample and its
community.
-Summarizes the most salient methodological actions of the tools and
their application.
-Summarize the most prominent findings and findings of scientific
research
-At the end there are at least five key words.
-The first section (search editorial) created by the researcher and does
not include quotes
- The introduction helps to prepare the mind of the reader to
feelproblem.
-Research variables are addressed in a balanced way.
-Its paragraphs are interconnected and carry sequential and logical
ideas.
Introduction
-The research gap is highlighted by a review of past efforts.
-The importance of the topic is illustrated by conference
recommendations and specialty leaders.
-Sequential from public to private in inverted pyramid style
-Written in clear language is far from complicated.
-Citing relevant literature relevant to the research topic
-The research problem is formulated in easy and clear language.
Problem search
-Contains global and local statistics.
-They contain a logical justification confirming the existence of the
problem.
-Cover the research variables comprehensively and clarify the
relationship between them
-Between the research gap and the relationship of research to research
literature
-They are formulated in a declarative phrase or a key question
-It does not contain dashes , and is formulated in interrogative terms
Search
questions
-Formulated in easy and clear language.
-Demonstrates the relationship between search variables .
Research - Measurable, verifiable, specific and clear

4. -Characterized by rationality and consistent with facts and theories.
hypotheses
- Able to interpretthe studied phenomena
-Written in clear and clear language.
Research
objectives
-Realistic and achievable within the limits of available potential.
-Related to the research problem and its questions
The applied importance of research.
Specific and related to the research topic
Importance of
research
.The theoretical importance of research.
The importance of research demonstrates the ratio of the community
and the sample.
The importance of the topic stands out compared to previous research
literature
-Agree with the search title.
Search limits
- It illustrates the temporal boundaries of research.
-The objective limits of research
- Demonstrates spatial boundaries of research
-Formulated in easy and clear language.
Search terms Terminology know idiomatic definition.
Idiomatic definitions from reliable primary sources
Terminology know a procedural definition
plementation
status
Yes no
Evaluation
The research variables are covered in a balanced theoretical framework
Previous studies presented in a balanced way
Links were made in a scientific way between the axes of the theoretical framework
- Have you written the theoretical framework and previous studies of the
research (Chapter II) according to the correct scientific standards in
writing scientific research? -

5. Writing a holistic view that links variables at the end of the theoretical framework
Theories related to research variables are included
Previous studies are related to the research topic
Previous studies presented in a balanced way
Discuss aspects of compatibility and disagreement of previous studies with current
research.
Relying on recent Arab and Foreign Studies.
Clarify the location of current research among previous studies .
The benefits of previous studies have been pointed out in the current research .
Previous studies included in the theoretical framework are all used to discuss the results
- Yeah. what'sadded
- Haveprevious studies beenpresentedindifferentaxes and relatedto researchvariables Or
inone axis Andwhy
-
( No) haveonly added studiesthatusetheresults of thestudy?
-Has a previousstudybeen addedfor thepurposeof notusingitto discusstheresultsof the
research ?
-
- Havepreviousstudiesbeen presented fromtheoldestto thelatestor viceversaAnd why
- Ensure the research methodological procedures(Chapter III)through which:
- What kind of sample did you use in your research

6. Random samples
Non-random samples
o Simple randomness sample
o Al-qadiyah sample
o Regular randomness sample
o Psoriasis sample
o Stratified random sample
o Quota sample
o Sample random cluster
o Growing specimen (snowball)
- What is the reason for choosing the typeof sample
-Was the number ofthe research community known-yes (the results were generalized).
-No (the results are not generalized, or the generalization of the results does not matter
- Was the search sample number representativeofthe community? -(Specific to quantum input)
- No, (sample determination was not based on statistical basis)
- Have the characteristics of the research community been accurately determined
- Yes, (statistical methods were used to determine the sample size)
- Is the research sample clearly described
- Check out some aspects of the final output of the message:
- Is the letter formatted and edited according to the rules of theguide to preparing letters at
the university or according to the method‫)؟‬
- Was the message shown to a proofreader

7. Quantitative tools
Qualitative tools
Closed test
Open testing
Closed resolution
Open resolution
Observation list for monitoring
Free note
Closed interview
Semi-metered/ or open interview
Content analysis monitoring list
Open content analysis card
- What search tools are used
Why did you choose these tools
Havemultiple methods been used to verify honesty and constancy
Have the study tools been applied to a primary sample similar to the primary
sample
Methods for verifying the authenticityand stability of instruments
When using meteredtools are theirstandard characteristics
indicated .
Haveyou explained the steps to preparethe researchtool
Concluded with the instrument prepared by the researcher .
. Search application procedures are detailed Application approvals-letters of the
researcher's task facilities – the administrators of the application – the duration of the
application-the place of application... Etc.
- - Ensurethecorrectnessof thepresentation and discussion of the
resultsof yourresearch (Chapter IV) throughthefollowing:
- - What style did you follow in presenting and discussing your

8. Individualdiscussion(resultsrelated to each studyquestion were
presented and discussed separately )
joint discussion (the resultsofeach question weredisplayed
separately,thenallthe resultswere discussed in one sectionWhy?
.
Did the personality and skillofthe researcher stand out in discussing the results
Arerecommendationsandproposalsapplicableto thelimitsof possibilities
Check thesoundness of writingyourresearchrecommendations andproposals(ChapterV)
Are therecommendationsconsistentwith thesearch results
Check the scientificdocumentationmethodandreferencelist :
Has itbeen documentedaccordingto scientificevidence?( APA - MLA ….. etc…)
Havereferences directlyrelated to theresearch problembeen relied upon
Do the references inthe body of the searchmatchthe listof references atthe end of the
search

9. Among themostimportantthingsthatstartto takeinto accountdo you notor careaboutitto the
researcherbeforeand duringthediscussionarethefollowing:
Message discussion guidelines:
-
Attendingdiscussions,especially inthefield of specialization,recording
observationsandbenefitingfromtheinteraction between thediscussantsand
the researcher
Advancetrainingon howandhowto presenttheresearch
abstract.
Discuss colleagues from specialtyholdersandtakeadvantageof their
feedback beforethe discussion.
Commitmentto thetimelimitof thepresentationand not to focus only on
onepart of the researchat the expenseof the otherparts.
Present the most prominent aspects ofthe research clearly and coherently.
A clear, calmvoice and a good encounter affect the evaluation
of thesearch.
Focus on theimportantelementswhen presentingthepresentation
through thepresentation slides, and do notfill theslideswitha lotof
unimportantpoints.

10. References :
-Creswell, J., W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). ResearchDesign: Qualitative, Quantitative, and
Mixed Methods Approaches (5th Ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.
- Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2018). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and
Applications (12th Ed.). Pearson.
- Move awayfrom the defensive attitude and accept some ideas,
adheringtobe new to you.
-Listen and listen members of the discussion Committee and stay
awayfrom emotion.
Stay away fromfocusingyour gazeon slidesor presentation
paper only.
Flexibility isrequired indiscussionpositionsbecausethey holddifferent
opinions.
Clarify what is meant by the discussion Committee when somequestions are not
clear.
Attention to the public appearancethat befits you as a researcher