Israeli Security Concerns

Israeli Security Concerns
Abstract The following essay takes a realist approach to the issue of Israel's refugee problem. The essay addresses the security issue of the 'Right of
Return 'where more than 4 million Palestinian termed refugees clamor to return to their homes that they were displaced from during the 1948 war.
Whilst Palestinians demand the right to return to their Israeli–located homes under the right of United Nations General Assembly article 11 of
Resolution 194, Israelis fear the displacement of their state by a huge and exponential number of Palestinian refugees returning. The essay
summarizes historical points that constitute the problem. Analysis of the problems shows that the traditional definition of 'refugee' has been
corrupted to suit UNRWA agenda where the refugee number has grown and will continue to grow to absurd lengths. One policy therefore
recommends that the UN amend this definition to reflect a more solid reality. An alternate policy recommends that the UNRWA be replaced by its
more affective predecessor, the UNHRCA. The essay, too, recommends that America work in amending this change since by so doing America will
be assisting her own terrorist problem. Table of contents A "Realistic" Approach to Regional Security in Israel Why the USA should care Key Issues
to be Resolved The Issue of 'Right of Return' Refugees Introduction: Historical points: The Refugee Issue at the Moment Analysis of 'Refugee' Policy
An alternate policy recommendation for the refugee
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Essay
The Israeli–Palestinian conflict was started when the United Nations proposed the partition plan for Jewish homeland in 1947. The Jewish agrees with
the plan but the Palestinians disagree because they think it is unfair for their land being taken. Since then, many wars have been fought between Israel
and Palestinians such as:
–1948 War of independence–1956 Sinai war
–1967 six day war –1973 Yom Kippur war etc.
These wars had made angry Palestinian lost more and more land causing many terrorist attacks and suicide bombings occurred during the conflict
planned by Palestinian terrorist organizations such as the Hamas. Civil Palestinians' anger had also lead to Intifada (1987) and Second ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
–Israeli settlements––––––––––––––Should the Israelis take down the settlements and let Palestinian build their own? (land problem)
–Palestinians –The anger of Palestinians has lead to the circle of violence and suicide bombings and Intifada had caused more Palestinians to die.
(Violence issue)
–Israelis–the Israeli government have to protect their boarders by using armed forces from being attack but this can lead to collateral damages
(violence issue) Different perspectives
–Quartet of Middle east– recognizes Israel but also wants Palestinian to have their own state. They struggle to find a way for peace. There are
different resolutions that have been suggested such as the Oslo Peace Accords in 1993, Road map for peace, Camp David Summit 2000, etc. but it all
failed.
–Palestinians–most Palestinian organizations like Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) just want to have their own state and Israelis withdrawn
from the occupied territories but extremist like Hamas wants to takeover the whole Israel and either make Jews as second citizens or push them to the
sea.
–Israelis–most political group in Israel also wants peace with Palestinians and come up with plans like the disengagement plan in 2005. But Zionism
extremist suggests that they should takeover the occupied

The Israeli-Palestinian Wall
The Israeli–Palestinian wall that has been under construction for nearly twelve years is adding more fuel to a fire that appears to only be growing.
The wall has been doing more harm to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict than good. Ironically, the wall was created to help the conflict during the time of
the Second Intifada that occurred from 2000 to 2006. The intention of the wall at the time was to put "...an end to the phenomenon of cross–border
Palestinian suicide bombers", and also had a "...wide support withing Israel, where it is seen as a security measure" (Procon.org 2). Over time, the once
perceived "security measure" turned into a negative aftereffect, mainly for the Palestinians. The Israeli–Palestinian wall has negative outcomes ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Palestinian economy, due to the route of the wall, has suffered tremendously. The displacement of Palestinian civilians has been a major
contributor to this issue. New rules and regulations require citizens who live in the territory between the green line must apply for a series of permits
that would allow them to live, drive, and work in the zone in which they are entrapped (Roy 34). Therefore, as Theirry Delbreuve said, "...agricultural
communities were losing contact with the land on which they depended both for their present livelihood and for their future survival" (United Nations
Page 2). Palestine's economy has suffered tremendously, because Israel has made it possible through the construction of the wall to have full control
over Palestinian's resources, such as land, water, and labor. This in turn has created Palestinian economic dependence on and with Israel (Current
History Page 32). As stated in Current History, the World Bank estimates that it will take some 20 years for the Palestinian economy to return to
where it was on the eve of the current Intifada, as their economy has contracted by half (Page 32). Palestine's "...access to work, food, housing, and
other needed resources has been severely eroded" (Current History Page 35), having a huge economic toll on Palestine's economy, which in turn has
increased tensions between the

The Israeli-Arab Wars
Israeli–Arab wars basically refer to a series of conflict between Israel and some Arab states. These wars have been complicated or heightened by a
list of factors linked to strategic, political, and economic interests in the regions of the great powers. In some occasions, people refer to the
Israeli–Arab wars as hostilities caused by religious differences between Jews and Muslims (Quandt, 2013). Nonetheless, this paper will analyze one of
the Israeli–Arab wars, the 1967 War also known as the Six–Day War, based on facts like its primary cause, the countries involved, the overall strategy
for each side, as well as the state which achieved military victory. Additionally, the primary battle of this conflict, its overall end result, and the reasons
for selecting the Six–Day War will also be covered.
Cause of the Six–Day War and the Countries Involved The Six–Day War started in June 1967, and was fought within a period of six days; between 5th
June and 10th June. The primary cause of this war was the dramatic intensification of the tension between Israel and its Arab neighboring states during
the mid–1960s. It's imperative to note that the tension had its own triggers, one being the Israel's policy of diverting water down to Negev Desert
from the Jordan River. Basically, this move angered the Arab countries, particularly Syria, Egypt and Jordan (Quandt, 2013). Israel got involved in the
war because of the tension caused by the terrorist activity against its land which had

The Arab Israeli Conflict
My chosen subteam for this negotiation is based on a Fundamentalist Christians opinion. As I had the chance to learn previously, Christians fully
support the relocation of Jews in this conflict. This is because one of the main roots of the Arab–Israeli Conflict starts by the Movement of Zionism.
The Bible is interpreted by many religions in many different ways, however the Christian Zionists belief in a series of Biblical Philosophies and
Prophecies. Some of this prophecies are events that have already happened, but they usually follow a series of chronological steps in order to end with
a final prophecy that comes true and leads to a major event. The Christian Bible says that once the Jews relocate back in Jerusalem (also called their
Holy Land), Jesus will descend to Earth for a Second Time to judge the living and the dead, finally building his Eternal Kingdom.
Perhaps, there is a belief that the Jewish Population was not as tangent about this conflict before. It was not until the Zionist Christians influenced them
with their beliefs, explaining them about said Biblical Prophecies that this unleashed a series of thoughts and feelings triggered by said powerful
words, making the Jewish people thrive the retake or relocation to their Holy Land. Thus all of this thoughts were brought up before the conflict began,
they still remain alive in the heads of many Jewish individuals nowadays.
For many years, there have been numerous attempts to come up with different solutions to

The Israeli-Palestinian Terrorist Attacks
The attack began on September 5, 1972, and involved eight Palestinian terrorists. The terrorists invaded the Olympic Village, killing two members of
the Israeli team and taking an addition nine other Israelis athletes as hostages in an attempt to bargain for the release of over 230 Palestinian prisoners
in Israeli jails. Following the abduction, all nine athletes, along with five terrorists and a German policeman, died in a botched rescue attempt
(History.com Staff, 2009). I think that this event is considered significant for a number of reasons. The first is that the Olympics were a globally
televised event with an estimated 1 billion people view the games. This made the terrorist attack and the events that subsequently ensured, one of the
most globally viewed terrorist events of that time period.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It demonstrated that these problems were not geographically confined and that the targets of the terrorist's discontent can include innocent bystanders.
The failed rescue, that resulted in the death of all the hostages, helped identify significant deficiencies in security tactics, techniques, and procedures
used during hostage events and highlighted several specific issues in Germanys response force that ultimately lead to the death of the hostages due to
miscommunication and lack of proper training in extreme

Israel 's International Affairs : A Major Issue Of Social...
Despite all of the focus on Israel's international affairs, ranging from relations with the United States, persistent conflicts with Palestine, and back and
forths with Iran, Israel has a major issue of social inequality within their nation. Despite narrowing the number of Israelis in poverty and raising
incomes in recent years, Inequality in Israel is still one of the highest of the Western developed countries. According to a report released by the
Organization for Economic Co–operation and Development, 18.6% of Israelis live beneath the poverty line, which can be defined as those who earn
less than 50% of Israel's median national income. Meanwhile, the top 10%, much to the chagrin of politicians like Bernie Sanders, were taking in
nearly 36% of the Israel's income while the bottom 10% were pulling less than 2%. Therefore, I believe that for Israel's economy to grow, the country
must focus on addressing the rampant inequality that their citizens face. The more people that earn more, the better off the nation will be as a whole.
One of the most common and popular statistics to look at when discussing inequality is the famous Gini coefficient. Despite Israel's Gini coefficient
dropping from .371 in 2007 to .360 in 2013, the country still ranks much closer to the "1" mark than most developed nations. It is important to note that
Israel's issue of income inequality does not stem simply from policies enacted by the current and former administrations, but rather a cultural

Israel 's Impact On The West Bank
Israel has made travel between major Palestinian population centers (Jenin, Nablus, Ramallah, Bethlehem, and Hebron) in the West Bank easier over
the last several years. Several major checkpoints in the West Bank that restricted direct movement between and into these cities have been removed or
modified. However, in general this opening is less the result of an overall easing in movement restrictions than the result of the institutionalization of
movement controls into a formal and permanent regime of restrictions that has replaced roadblocks with gates that can be opened and closed at the
whim of the military and that has reconfiguring how Palestinians travel.
According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While Palestinian movement is severely restricted, a separate system of roads that are closed to Palestinians or that bypass Palestinian communities has
been set up for Settlers to ensure their unrestricted movement in the West Bank and between the West Bank and Israel.[iii] According to the Israeli
human rights organization B'Tselem,
"there were 67 kilometers of roads in the West Bank that Israel classified for the sole, or practically sole, use of Israelis, first and foremost of settlers.
Israel also prohibits Palestinians from even crossing some of these roads with vehicles, thereby restricting their access to nearby roads that they are
ostensibly not prohibited from using. In these cases, Palestinians travelers have to get out of their vehicle, cross the road on foot, and find an alternative
mode of transportation on the other side."[iv]
OCHA has also reported that in 2013 at least 55 West Bank communities which are home to more than 180,000 people remain completely isolated as a
result of roadblocks, barriers, checkpoints and other movement restrictions. All of the main roads into and out of these communities remain blocked
and residents wishing to leave these communities must use alternative routes that are two to five times longer than the blocked direct routes. Many

The Arab Israeli Palestinian Conflict
The Middle East has long been home to very deep–rooted conflict. For too long, the citizens of the Middle East have lived in the central of death and
fear. The animosity between few, takes the hope of hundreds. The Arab
–Israeli–Palestinian conflict is most notably the largest issue preventing peace in
the Middle East, but it is by no means the only issue. The issue of bankrolling and foreign aid are also issues preventing peace; because the U.S
provides so much funding and foreign aid to certain countries, it is in some sense encouraging them to continue acting the way they act now and
not change for the better of the region. It is also making the U.S look biased and can potentially cause issues for America in the long run, if they
haven't already. There is also the conflict of the Persian Gulf; the importance of these "new" resources and how it could affect the world economy
and also the balancing of powers in the Persian Gulf; The U.S and the Middle Eastern nations will need to work to together to bring about security and
stability into the Persian Gulf and hopefully it can overflow to the Middle East as well.
ISRAELI–PALESTINIAN CONFLICTS
President George W. Bush in his June 24, 2002 address to the nation said this: "The conflict betweenIsrael and Palestine is just one of the many facets
that have shaped modern day politics in the Middle East. It is a conflict rooted in generations of violence, discrimination and prejudice that is
complicated by a history older

Israeli Palestine Conflict
During World War II, the Palestinian leadership actively supported the Nazi party (Beinin). The israeli
–Palestine conflict is one of the longest ongoing
conflicts throughout history dating all the way back to 3,000 years of conflict between these two very different cultures, and the land they live on. Even
though the Palestinian death toll has been unfortunately very high throughout this ongoing conflict, Israel must and should take necessary action to
defend itself from the Palestinian terrorism, and Israel has done everything in its power to bring a peaceful end to this seemingly never–ending conflict.
The ethical differences that are brought up during the Israeli–Palestine conflict are one of the leading causes of why this conflict never ends and, why
Israel must take action against Palestine. In the latest conflict between these two, Israel has always taken multiple steps to make sure that civilian
casualties are kept to a minimum. Some examples of Israel's efforts to limit ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Israelis who practice Judaism and Zionism are constantly being persecuted by Palestinians who practice a radical form of Islam. Zionism is based on
the principle that the Jewish people move to their homeland, which is present day Israel, and this has led to the main disagreement of these two very
different cultures (Reiter). While some Palestinians are practicing a radical form of Islam that is very anti–Semitic towards western culture and
religion such as Judaism. They use this belief of radical Islam so that they can justify and continue their terrorist activities against innocent civilians.
The Israelis religion of Judaism and Zionism have been peacefully practiced throughout history, however the same cannot be said for Islam, because
the Palestine leadership and terrorist have continually used their belief of Islam as a scapegoat for their barbaric actions against the Jewish people

Issues Between Palestine and Israelis
Issues that continue to block peace between Palestinians and Israelis
The issue of Palestine and Israel is one that has been hotly contested for over a thousand years. The last fifty years have been especially important in
the history of the Jewish people and Palestinians. Since the death of Yasser Arafat on the 11th of November 2004, and the election of Mahmoud
Abbas as his successor as leader of the Palestinian Authority, significant steps have been taken towards a lasting peace. This will hopefully lead to a
conclusion of the second Palestinian intifada, which began in late September 2000, and to an end of the oppression of the Palestinian people by the
Israeli Defense Forces. Both Jews and Arabs have suffered heavily from the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Only around 20% of the existing Arab population remained within the new state of Israel. The population of Israel doubled within the first year of
formation as a result of Holocaust survivors who no longer felt comfortable living in their existing homelands, and Jewish immigrants from Arab
countries.
War broke out between Israel and its Arab neighbors (Egypt, Syria and Jordan) on June 5th 1967. Israel successfully defeated the Arab forces after
just six days and as a result of the short–lived war, Israel gained control of the Gaza Strip, the Sinai Peninsula, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights.
The newly conquered territory increased the size of Israel by a factor of four and placed one million more Arabs under the control of Israel. In
addition to the Arabs under Israeli control, one million Arab refugees were created to join the refugee camps in neighboring countries. The 1967 war
had huge political significance. Israel showed the world that it was able to defend its territory and that it was able, and prepared to launch strategic
strikes that could result in gaining territory and upsetting the balance in the region. The Arab nations did not appear to learn strategic lessons. They
launched a third war in 1973 in the hope of regaining their territory lost to Israel, but they were able to adjust their military techniques, and so were
hopeful that they would be more successful in future conflicts against the Jewish state.
On holiest day in the Jewish calendar,

The Prospect Of A Two State Nation Solution For Israel...
The Israel–Palestine conflict is one of the most long–term, pressing, and largely confounding social, political, and national quandaries of our age. Since
we have been moving with surprising velocity into the vast horizons of globalization, the conflict has built up tremendous momentum and has called
into question the adequacy of our current attempts at coming to a peaceful resolution that can simultaneously and successfully address both sides of
the struggle. The purpose of this paper has been to understand the prospect of a two–state nation solution for Israel and Palestine. The discussion arises
a retrospective view of the context behind the present analysis. We begin with a discourse that informs the reader of the historical narrative between
the Jewish inhabitants of Israel and the Palestinians who also seek to live in the lands which comprise Israel. At the forefront of the discussion are
some key issues such as trends in Israeli settlement expansion over time, the manner in which these settlements create political challenges towards the
prospect of a two–state solution, and the fragmentation of power within Palestinian political parties which inhibit the opportunity for proper
negotiations amongst the two parties. Finally, we delve into a discussion on nationalism, it's importance in the discussion of a two–state solution, and
the challenges posed when trying to formulate US Foreign Policy towards the matter.
(Part A) R.B.G.
The scope of Israeli settlement activity

The Arab/Israeli Conflict
The Arab Israeli conflict.
The Arab/Israeli conflict is a conflict between the Arabs and the Jews over a small piece of land known as the holy land which is an area in the
Middle East of the Arab world. The Arabs call the land Palestine, the Jews call it Israel but both religions have strong religious links with the land.
There is conflict between the two religions because they both believe that the land belongs to them. it all started back in 135 AD when the Jews were
expelled from they're homeland in Palestine causing them too spread out across Europe creating the Diaspora. Although the jews had been forced to
leave the homeland they never lost their identity as jews and still longed too return to their ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
in 1918 britain aided by the arabs captured palestine from the the ottoman turks but britain had now made too many promises that hey couldn't keep .
Many Arabs opposed British troops because of England's failure to fulfill its promise and were also getting angry about the increase of jewish
migrating to palestine. Arabs became concerned that Jewish immigration would threaten their position in Palestine which lead to large scale attacks on
the jews. At the time of Hitler's dictatorship in Germany, Jewish immigration increased dramatically in 1933. An Arab revolt started which Britain
suppressed with the help of Zionist militias. Zionist settlements climaxed in 1936. In 1947, Britain forbid Jewish refugees from nazi concentration
camps to land in Palestine to prevent war between Jews and Arabs, which resulted in worldwide criticism of Britain. Britain withdrew itself from the
situation handing over the mandate over Palestine, leaving the United Nations to deal with the situation. The United Nations proposed that Palestine
was divided into two states, one for the Arabs and one for the Jews, however the Arabs opposed this idea claiming that the UN plan allotted too much
territory to the Jews. the arabs thought it was unfair that the jews should get more land because the arabs were by far the larger population but
because of the holocaust the was a lot of sympathy for the jews and this may be why the got more land.
On May 14th 1948 Israel became

Gush Thief
It has been ten years since the population of Gush Katif were ordered to move from their homes. The enforced evacuation was an agonizing episode
that has been recorded with tears in the annals of Israeli history. Soldiers were forced to execute a plan with which they disagreed and images of IDF
soldiers confronting Israeli residents during the evacuation were heartbreaking. Even today.
Many residents were religious, but there were countless secular Jews. The community of 8,600 were confident that the sand dunes of this ocean side
area could be productive farming land and they worked hard to develop this smallest region. In nourishing the desert, Israel gained another area that
could flourish.
Nezer Hazani was the first Gazan Jewish village ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Today, you can visit the Gush Katif Museum in Jerusalem and the event is remembered each year on Gush Katif Day, celebrated on February 11th by
every school in the Israeli Educational system. "The Gush Katif Committee and the Gush Katif and Northern Shomron Heritage Center decided that
there is an educational value to the Gush Katif story. The 22nd of Shvat, is a day that celebrates religious faith, Zionism, settlements, and the Israeli
State as well as discussing their complexity. This day was chosen as Gush Katif Day because it is the anniversary of the day when Netzer Hazani, the
first civilian community in Gush Katif, was

The Egyptian Arab Israeli Conflict
Introduction: In just 25 years, 5 wars were started with 11492 Israeli and 55300 Arabs deaths costing the countries not only millions of dollars but
also the loss of life and peace. The Arab–Israeli conflict began in 1948 when Israel declared itself an independent nation after the 2nd world war. Even
as Egypt and the Middle East fought off colonialism and foreign enemies they still managed to keep a constant stream of war between themselves.
The dictionary definition of a hero is, a man admired for his achievements and noble qualities and/or one who shows great courage. Showing courage
and noble qualities can be taken to mean many things, the most perfect definition I believe is a person who stands up for what they believe and puts the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
the Suez Canal but France, England and Israel attack and occupy the area
This battle is left unresolved because there is no treaty and France, England and Israel withdraw because of international pressures (America)
Egypt 's ability to resist outside pressures made them a hero in the Arab world and of nonaligned countries
The battle of 1956 made Egypt the leading "nonaligned" country and Nassar gave voice to the desires of undeveloped & post colonial societies
Trying to modernize
The six–day war of 1967 was an Israeli attack on Egypt, Jordan and Syria
Israel gains much Arab territory
There was no treaty at the end of this war only a cease–fire
Israel was extremely successful in these wars in large part due to the fact that America was supplying most of their weapons and money
As Anwar al–Sadat said, "America is Israel's Lifeblood."
Through all these wars the Arabs never lost hope that they would win and banded together in unity against Israel; this idea is called Pan Arabism
Pan Arabism is, "The nationalist notion of cultural unity among Arab countries"
The origins of this idea are from the 19th and 20th centuries increased literacy in the Middle East that lead to a renaissance among Arab Nations
This renaissance also lead to independence from the Ottoman Empire (1918) and the British Colonists
Another event that spurred this idea to its climax was the foundation of the Arab League in 1945
The peak time of Pan Arabism happened under Nassar in Egypt
He was the charismatic

Essay on Israeli Settlements
On the 17th of April 2012, Palestinian Authority President, Mahmoud Abbas, sent a letter to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu indicating the
only way the Palestinian Authority would agree to move forward with peace talks is if Israel would agree to freeze the building of settlements in the
West Bank1. Israeli settlements in the West Bank have become the largest obstacle in negotiating a two–state solution and it appears the continued
expansion of Israeli settlements may render a two–state solution impossible. Inside the Israeli government following the 1967 war there was a debate
about how to deal with the newly occupied territories of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Sinai Peninsula, and Golan Heights. The debate revolved around
two ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With Israel's border needs in mind, Allon proposed a multifaceted solution for Israel's occupation of the West Bank. He suggested Israel would
incorporate the Jordan Valley, the Judean desert along the west coast of the Dead Sea, the area surrounding the Jerusalem metropolitan area, and a
small tract of land south west of the Palestinian city of Hebron6. This configuration of newly incorporated land was designed to "provide Israel with the
minimal defensible borders that are indispensable without impairing, to any meaningful extent, the basic interests of the other side, including those of
the Palestinian community"7. It is important to note that Allon envisioned that the non–incorporated "Palestinian" parts of the West Bank would
remain free of Israeli settlers and would eventually be handed back to the Kingdom of Jordan in order to form a future Jordanian–Palestinian state. The
second important part of Allon's plan is the use of a "selective settlement policy" within the incorporated areas of the West Bank as part of Israel's
defense strategy8. The selective settlement policy allowed for Israelis to settle in the West Bank, but only in areas lacking large Palestinian cities and
villages. Unfortunately, the Allon Plan failed to account for the religious fundamentalism that would motivate much of the settlement building in the
West Bank.
Founded in 1974, the Gush Emunim movement strongly advocated the return of Jews to the

The Importance Of Policing In Israel
"Lessons from empirical research on policing in Israel: policing terrorism and police–community relationships" by Perry, S., & Jonathan–Zamir, T.
(2014), was an article set out to review empirical research on police–community relations in Israel regarding policing terrorism. The goal of the study
was to find insights to improve the impact counter–terrorism has on the community in Israel and other democratic nations that face similar issues when
actively using counter–terrorism tactics. Much of the data from the articles used in this review were gathered from the Israel National Police (INP),
which is the only police force in Israel, which may weaken the statistics gathered due to government agencies not having accurate data. This is an ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Israel, the Arabs were the ones, especially unhappy with the police due to the hostile and militaristic treatment from the police. The article outlines
different ways to possibly mitigate these issues. First, the police should focus on fairness when treating citizens, as well as focus on traditional police,
not just counter–terrorism. There was very little this article cited on the effectiveness of specific strategies and empirical studies in Israel have been
lacking on this subject, this is due to the sensitive nature of the information regarding counter–terrorism.
When comparing the legitimacy framework for Israel and other western nations, including the United States they all share similar important factors for
police legitimacy including procedural justice and fairness of the process. In Israel the amount of people who see the process as fair, the amount of
neutrality and transparency, the respect police give, and the ability to participate have been lacking. This is largely due to the increased amount of
counter–terrorism in recent time, especially during the Intifada and other uprisings. The amount of community policing in Israel was found to be weak.
The Israeli police should consider increasing the implementation of community policing to improve community trust and support.
Research has shown that the relations between the police and Israeli Arabs can be increased as well as

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
"Since Biblical times there has been a conflict between the Arabs and the Jews in what today is known as Israel. It began with the birth of two boys,
Ismael and Isaac; born to two different mothers and fathered by Abraham. That conflict has become more intricate, more serious and much more
complicated" ("Israeli–Palestinian Conflict."). "Beginning with the Diaspora and furthered by the British Mandate post World War I and the Holocaust
during the period of World War II,Jews sought to return to their Homeland only to find that they once again were unwanted; this time by their Arab
brethren. Wars ensued and further complications arose.Time and again war has broken out between the two peoples, solutions sought but not found
and the search for ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Barriers to Peace in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict." Kas.de. The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies, 2010. Web. 24 Apr. 2016.
"Introduction to Israel: Opposing Viewpoints." Israel. Ed. Myra Immell. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints
in Context. Web. 24 Apr. 2016.
"Israeli–Palestinian Conflict." Israeli–Palestinian Conflict. 23 July 2014. Web. 24 Apr. 2016.
"Primer on Palestine, Israel and the Arab–Israeli Conflict." Primer on Palestine, Israel and the Arab–Israeli Conflict | Middle East Research and
Information Project. Web. 24 Apr. 2016.
"Stick a label on it; Israel and Palestine." The Economist 14 Nov. 2015: 49(US). Religion and Philosophy Collection. Web. 24 Apr. 2016.
Zamkanei, Shayna. "The politics of defining Jews from Arab countries." Israel Studies 21.2 (2016): 1+. Religion and Philosophy Collection. Web. 24
Apr.

The Birth Right Program Essay example
As a Jewish student there is a program available to go to Israel for a summer, if you have never been before and experience it first hand. It is called
the "Birth Right Program." The trip is free, the only thing you have to pay for is the round trip plane ticket and any souvenirs you may buy. While
you are there with the other students just like yourself, you experience different places like the Wailing Wall and the city of Jerusalem, as well as
different Israeli holidays including Shabbat every Friday night. I have contemplated going on the Birth Right trip for a few years now. To have the
chance to experience first hand a culture that I really only know through stories and history books... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Their small ceremonies and everyday practices serve to reiterate and substantiate their beliefs and customs (Gibson). Israel has a very high standard of
living. Many people in rural areas of Israel live in collective communities. Members of these communities share food and property. They also exchange
labor for medical care (Davis). In the United States, "Individualism is the economic realm manifests itself in the belief that individuals, not communities
in which they live, determine their own economical outcomes" (Davis). An individualist solution to poverty is not more government spending on
welfare programs and charities, but greater individual effort by those on the bottom to improve their incomes. Individuals themselves deserve the credit
and/or blame for their economic fortune or misfortune, while collectivists do not agree with this theory at all.
As the United States is very individualistic, it is also distinctively masculine, while Israel, once again found in the center of the scale is more feminine.
The two characteristics go hang in hand. High masculinity believes in achievement and judging individuals on their performance, just as individualist
cultures do. Feminine cultures believe more in life choices and equality between the sexes is normal. It is made clear that both feminine and masculine
qualities

The Book Of Amos By The Minor Prophet Amos
The book of Amos, written by the minor prophet Amos, is found towards the end of the Old Testament of the Bible. The book of Amos is God's
message to His people to repent and reform, as He is angered by the Israelite's unfaithfulness, perversion and distortion of religion. This period in Israel's
history highlights the nation's ignorance, unfaithfulness and disregard of God's authority; the nation had already blatantly ignored the forewarnings of
other minor prophets beforehand. The first four chapters are a warning of judgment, which the Israelites knew was coming. The passage of Amos 5 is
the climax of the text, and is the epitome of God's intervention expressed as a passionate warning and emotive lamentation. Amos establishes that God
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Amos utilises the imagery of Israel 'as though a man fled from a lion' to portray the character of God as a mighty and ferocious power in the
symbolism of a lion. Furthermore, the lion simile embellishes God's authority in the text and demands a strong presence in the dynamics of the
text. Similarly, in verse 6, Amos expresses that God shall 'break out like a fire', again using a symbol of the ferocity of nature to express God's fury.
Amos uses strong emotive language in verse 21, as God speaks to Israel saying that He 'hates', 'despises' and 'rejects' their supposedly religious
actions; Amos is highlighting to the audience the rich emotion and the extent of anger that God is projecting unto Israel, as God rarely expresses what
He loathes unless administering judgment. The repeated themes of despair, destruction and darkness in the text foreshadow the downfall Israel would
surely meet as a result of their actions. The author's use of prophetic woe emphasise the purpose of the text – a warning of judgement and an emotive
lamentation for the people of Israel.
Amos 5 centres majorly on God's disdain for the Israelites shallow religious ceremonies and practices. During the era of Amos 5, the worship of God
(or Yahweh) encompassed many strict religious practices and ceremonies, including prayer, festivals and sacrifices. Amos describes God's hatred for
these practices, as the Israelites have deterred from true

The First Arab-Israeli War
After some Arab–Israeli conflict, the Arab countries requested and threatened the U.S. encourage Israel to find peace, and Richard Nixon should have
submitted to their requests because of the ability for the Arab countries to have oil cutbacks, make price increases and put an Oil Embargo on the U.S.
The long lasting tension between the Arab countries and Israel led to the first and second Arab–Israeli war, however, it made King Faisal of Saudi
Arabia want to try and have peace with Israel. In 1948 and 1949, during the first Arab–Israeli war, the pipeline, that had Iraqi oil, was cut off on its way
to Haifa. The Arabian pipeline was also delayed during this war which hurt the Middle East and Their oil profits. Another event was in 1956 during ...
On live television Nixon said, "oil without a market, as Dr. Mossadegh learnt many, many years ago, doesn't do much good.... We and Europe are
the market... if they continue to up the price they will lose the markets." Later, Nixon sent Secretary of State John Irwin to three of the main oil
producing countries in the Middle East: Iran, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. According to State Department Spokesman, John F. King, Irwin was going
to give the three rulers of each country, one of which was Faisal, a letter from Nixon expressing his concerns with what could transpire. Irwin was
sent to try and persuade the countries to not do anything too rash and discuss ideas that could be of common interest. Although, some realized that
the three countries Irwin visited were the most conservative out of all the countries in OPEC as well as the ones to have the most economic and
political ties to the U.S. This was seen to some as an attempt to try and break up OPEC countries. Obviously neither of these approaches worked as
the countries stayed together and Faisal was not too worried about Nixon's threats. Instead, he emphasized his earlier threats by saying they would
take action if the U.S. did not get the Israel troops out of Arab land. Other people, such as Zaki Yamani, Saudi oil minister and James Akins, a US
ambassador, warned that Saudi may very well cutback their oil.

Arab-Israeli Conflict Essay
Arab–Israeli Conflict During the First World War (1914–1918), Britain met with problems concerning promises made, yet not being kept. Britain,
knowing that it needed all the help it could get against the German allies, promised land to people who desperately wanted it. However, as it was
revealed Britain had no intention of honouring their word. The first promise to be made was to the Arabs, in a desperate attempt to overpower one of
the countries the British were fighting; the Turks. The Arab leader, Sherif Hussein, agreed to help defeat the Turks, on the condition that at the end of
the war, the Arabs would get their freedom. The British accepted the terms, and in 1915 it was written up in... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was, like the McMahon letter to the Arabs, promising the Jews ownership of Palestine. This was, made at a time when Britain was having
many problems fighting the allies, and needed all the help they could find. There are a few reasons why historians believe this letter was issued. It
was thought that the Jews in America and Russia had a lot of money and power, and so would therefore encourage their governments to continue in
the war. There was sympathy for the Zionists, as the leaders like Balfour knew that the Jews had endured a lot of hardship, and suffered many
injustices, and so saw this promise as a chance to right some of the wrongs committed. Britain used the Suez Canal, in Egypt. However, it was right
next door to Palestine, and so it would greatly benefit Britain if the people who governed the neighbouring Palestine, were friendly towards Britain and
their interests. The new leader of the Zionists, Chaim Weizmann, was a friend of a few leading politicians such as Balfour and the present Prime
minister, Lloyd George. It is quite probable that the British Government had no idea of the changes that this Declaration would cause on the short and
long–term effects on the problems between the Arabs and the Jews. The consequences of these unkept promises were quite terrible for Britain, making
their situation in Europe much worse. The Arabs

A Relationship Based On Paternalism And Condescension...
What was once a relationship based on paternalism and condescension between Ashkenazi and Mizrahi Jews has gradually transformed into a more
leveled socioeconomic platform between the two ethnic groups. The Jews of Ashkenazi descent, mainly from Eastern European countries and Britain,
arrived in the decades before the creation of the State of Israel and were able to rapidly create a new society. Shortly after Israel's independence,
massive waves of Jewish immigrants flooded the country, of which a large part were MizrahimJews from North Africa and the Middle East fleeing
discrimination in Arab lands. The dominant Ashkenazim viewed the incoming Mizrahi Jews as backwards and burdensome to the newly–founded
country's cultural and economic image and took measures to make them conform to their customs. This process of conditioning ultimately led to a
wide socioeconomic gap between the two groups that prompted political clashes and riots. Recent trends and changes in the country's political structure
have narrowed the gap and point toward equal opportunities between Mizrahi Jews and Ashkenazi Jews.
Originating in Europe, Zionism was embedded with Western–leaning principles that aimed at coalescing the Jews of the Diaspora into one unified and
modernized Jewish identity within Israel. When it was introduced to the old Yishuv, it reflected the Ashkenazim political and cultural values, including
"liberal democracy and national self–determination" and therefore assured their success

Jewish Folk Dance As A Means Of Creating A New Israeli...
Jewish national identity was colonized when Jewish people were forced out of ancient Israel and dispersed to various different nations. Anti–Semitism
was one of the principle means for this colonization because it made it dangerous for Jewish people to express their own national identity in the
European nations they dispersed to. As a result, certain traditions, like Jewish folk dance, which were not codified, were lost. Jewish folk dance also
disappeared because folk traditions are strongly connected to the land in which they originated and the majority of Jews left Israel. Furthermore,
because of the third commandant of the Torah, Jews were not allowed to depict images of their dance. Consequently, their traditional dance was lost
forever. However, when the Jews returned to Israel in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, they found it important to recreate traditions like folk
dance to reassert their fractured nationhood after so many years of diaspora. Thus, Israeli folk dance was a means of creating a new Israeli culture.
Israeli folk dance was created by using elements from other dance cultures with themes and music of modern Israel. In this paper, I will argue that
while anti–Semitism resulted in the colonization of Jewish national identity, women re–created Israeli folk dance as a means to establish a new Jewish
identity, as well as an identity for themselves. By focusing on Romania and Yemen, we will identify the vestiges of colonialism in Israeli folk dance, and

The Arab Israeli Conflict Essay
According to an apocryphal story, Pope John Paul once said that he believes there are two possible solutions to the Arab–Israeli conflict, the realistic
and the miraculous. The realistic being divine intervention, and the miraculous being a voluntary agreement by both parties. On September 13th, 1993,
it looked like the miraculous had happened when the Oslo Accords were signed by Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation
Organization (PLO) Chairman Yasser Arafaton the White House South Lawn. However, the objectives of the historic accords were never fully
implemented and the Palestinians remain a stateless nation. Further steps toward Israeli–Arab peace, including the Cairo Agreement, Oslo II and the
Camp David Summit, have fallen short of the goals of both parties.
When he became president in 1993, Bill Clinton and his advisors did not initially make Israeli–Palestinian peace a priority. The administration looked
first to other Middle Eastern affairs, believing that an Israeli–Syrian agreement was more likely, and that the policy of "dual containment" in Iran and
Iraq was more pressing. They thought that once they made a breakthrough between Israel and Syria the Lebanese would be close behind, and that this
would put pressure on the Iran and Iraq, the biggest opponents of any sort of Israeli–Arab peace deal (US Office of the Historian). The Americans were
made aware of the secret negotiations that had begun in Oslo in December 1992 between the

Constructed Functionalism
"How will your family react, if they find out how you spend your nights here?" said Gil. Isn't it true that as a free individual, Nimr has every right to
pursue the sexual orientation that makes him feel most comfortable? Isn't it true that Abir should choose the man she is in love with and not the man
chosen by her family? Isn't it true that Gil's discovery of Nabil's cache of guns is only one small step towards preventing a shooting war between Israelis
and West Bank Palestinians and regrettably gives credence to the hard measures he takes?
In this paper, it will be shown that the Deconstructed functionalist and Marxist perspectives are correct. Deconstructed functionalist and Marxist argue
that the love between Nimr and Roy is genuine ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although there is some value to the Deconstructed social constructionist interpretation, it contains several weaknesses. The following review of some
aspects of the plot will reveal some of those weaknesses. According to Rauch, identity politics is defined as anything that concerns a person's identity
which therefore includes a person's race, religion, gender, sexuality, etc. Steve Bannon states that since the Democrats fixate the majority of their time
on identity politics, this will be the reason why they will end up losing voters because they are not focussing on the "real issues" such as economic
nationalism. In other words, Steve Bannon's arguments explain why Donald Trump was elected and this ideology that he presents states that there is
only one race; the white race and this creates white consciousness. Identity politics plays a huge role in the movie Out in the Dark because the main
protagonists, Nimr and Roy, both have identities that conflict with the reality that they live in: one

The Settlement Of The Israeli Essay
The settlement of the Israeli started with the ideology of Zionism, which is to found a Jewish–majority nation that serves as the safe heaven for all
Jewish identifying population over the world, in its most sacred place: the father land. After the long battle against anti–Semitism and the most
traumatic experience of the Holocaust, the Jewish population was compelled to find a nation that it would provide a safe place; such sentiment and
obligation to the both physical and social survival of the population is sound and legitimate. However, Israel, as a nation, is in a tough spot:
geologically, it is located in the Middle East, sitting on what used to be considered Palestinian territory; due to the Diaspora, new–not wholly new, but
post–Diaspora new–groups settled in the region, and the founding of the nation is inherently in conflict with the both settler's right to live. Due to the
Middle Easternism and its hostility to the West and the Israelites originating from the West in concept [sic], Israel's fundamental existence is threatened
(Drake, ). As a result, whereas the Palestine–Israel conflict is situated in post–Cold War era that marks the decline in the physical military front, the
foreign policy of Israel for the most part still adopts classical concept of security; alas, Israeli government always tried to incorporate human security
concerns to be dealt during the peace processes with surrounding Middle Eastern countries, however short, which shows that the Israeli

The Arab-Israeli War
1)Starting from November 1914 the ottoman empire entered the first world war with the alliance of Germany. At first it was mentioned that the
empire wanted to avoid any wars and wanted to have a secure alliance with Britain. The reason being is that a leader named Enver Pasha felt that it
was in the empires best interest. Knowing that France, Britain, and Russia had grew their own empires and could try and sabotage the Ottoman empire
again. So enver led a secret negation with the government of Germany and made a treaty to secure an alliance. This treaty in particular promised things
such as war material, financial assistance and military advisor. (chapter 6 pge148–149). The outcome of starting a jihad on November,11,1914 wasn't
as the Germany ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Going back to chapter six and seven France and Britain wanted to control and divide the Arab countries to themselves. They saw Gamal abd el naser
as "the champion of a dangerous new force". Which obviously could hurt the mobilization of the vital interest in the middle east. (pg296–298). Once the
canal was secured the French authorities asked the government of Israel to attack, in result that actually started the Arab–Israeli war. All three parties
had a secret agreement to invade and provoke the Arabs. But France and Britain knowing that they are both aiming towards their own agenda and had
a whole ultimatum to both the Egyptians and Israel. (pg301) regardless of the three power houses fighting against Egypt, the Suez crisis was one of
the most classic examples a military defeat but turned into political victory. Another party emerges which is called ba'thism and it also calls for full
Arab unity, with the revolution Egypt and Syria had a new age of Arab unity. (pg306–308). Chapter 11 is all about the decline of the Arab Nationalism.
Now the blame shifts to the Jordanian. The Saudis and Americans. They were seen as the progressive states unlike Syria, Egypt, and Iraq. It seemed
like every Arab state wanted to fight each other. Mostly the Palestinian and the Jordanians. The only person that everyone thought could help was
Gamal abd el Naser, being such an influence to the whole Arab kingdom. But sadly, he died of a heart heart once the Jordanian and Palestinian stop
fighting for a bit. The Arab nation become depressed and then something happened to the Arab world. It was firmly divided into states. They had their
own agenda and interest to seek for themselves. The governments to each decided each had their own wealth and some even could control with oil.

The Israeli and Palestinian Conflict
The Israeli and Palestinian conflict has been an unwavering conflict that has plagued the world for longer than any can remember. I, myself am
hopelessly torn on whether I am Pro–Palestine, or Pro–Israel. I find it difficult to make an informed and unbiased decision on the conflict with the two
conflicting stories being relayed by the pro–Israel documentary as well as by the Pro–Palestine documentary. I feel as though it would be impossible
for me to make a decision on the issue unless I was able to see for myself. I see both sides of the issue, and I sympathize with both sides on different
points. The two documentaries that were shown were very different, telling conflicting stories, and representing the conflict differently which led me
to formulate an unclear opinion. The first documentary: Democracy's Outpost the Case for Israel, seemed a very biased documentary in favor of
Israel. It didn't have actual evidence of their point of view, rather stated their opinions without any evidence to support it. The documentary in support
of Palestine, seemed to have more evidence of the view points it was supporting.The people that are in favor of Israel claim that Israel has given
Palestine their chance to have an independent state multiple times. Dershowitz, the main voice of the documentary, claims that Palestine had been
given a chance to have their own independent state multiple times. In 1938 they were offered about 80% of what is now Israel, and the people of
Israel only

Displacement And Delay Of Photography
Displacement and Delay in Photography
"Photography endows place with a certain freedom, liberating place from the commitment to a specific point in time and space, exposing some generic
dimension that exists there, enables place to be a 'sort of place' (...)." Taking into account the sentence of Miki Kratsman, I would like to present his
photographs entitled Territory and the way in which they relate to the concepts ofspace and time. First, it is necessary to emphasize that the author, born
in Argentina and later having immigrated to Israel, during his career has often documented the difficult Israeli–Palestinian situation. Moreover, his
interest in reporting from this area of conflict is significant since he appears as "one of the few Israeli journalists who still cross the border today"
The project "Territory" was realized in 2005, seven months before the evacuation of Israeli settlements present in the South of the Gaza Strip. Thus, the
photos do not show the direct conflict between two populations or what remains of a place tormented by war, on the contrary, they exhibit a zone, an
agglomerate of houses and lives about to disappear forever. Although when Kratzman has reachedGush Katif only a small part of the inhabitants has
already left their home, what emerges through the images is a feeling of absolute desolation and emptiness. Therefore, despite its being populated, this
piece of land seems to be

The Arab-Israeli Conflict Essays
The current conflict in the Middle East between the Israeli Jews and the Palestinian Arabs has many historical roots. Several events in the history of
this conflict have been very important and also have a strong connection with the current situation between the two sides.
One of these important events was the Nazi Holocaust. During the Second World War the Jews were persecuted by the Nazis and sent to
concentration camps. By the end of the war in 1945 6 million Jews were killed and 250,000 were freed from the concentration camps. As news about
the holocaust emerged there was widespread sympathy for the Jews especially in the U.S.A. which had a large Jewish population. As a result of this, ...
The Six Day War of 1967 was a dramatic military victory for the Israelis. In just six days the Israeli army managed to take out most of the
surrounding Arab state's air force and regained control of the land that was lost in previous battles. The Israelis had taken Sinai, the Gaza Strip, the
West Bankand Jerusalem. The Golan Heights were also seized by the Israelis which is a very advantageous military spot because it is an area of high
ground on the border of Israel and Syria. The Israelis came out of the war feeling proud and victorious that they managed to take on the three Arab
countries by themselves. They were seen as the stronger military side by the rest of the world. The Arab states were left with little land or pride
after the humiliation of the war. The PLO (Palestine Liberation Organisation) began to grow in size because the Palestinians were determined to
fight for their homeland after this embarrassing defeat. Terrorism soon started to spread to Europe and other parts of the world like in 1972 when 9
Palestinians seized and killed 11 Israeli athletes at the Olympic Games. This act of terrorism and others like it were the result of divisions within the
PLO which lead to the creation of extremist groups who decided that raids on

Israelis Immigration to Canada
Purpose and Overview
Group rationale
From 2003 to 2012, more than 43,000 Israelis immigrated to Canada as new residents, students, and workers (Citizenship and Immigration Canada,
2012). Similarly to other immigrants, Israeli newcomers tend to populate and reside in large metropolitan cities, such as Toronto. As the majority of
immigrants fall under the "family class" category (Citizenship and Immigration Canada, 2012), it is expected that children and adolescents that are part
of immigrant families are affected by this life transition. This proposal will outline a counselling group for Israeli adolescents who had recently
immigration and now reside in the Greater Toronto Area.
New immigrants expect and usually face numerous challenges prior to and after arriving at their new home country. A recent comprehensive review of
the health of immigrant youth in Canada revealed that immigrant youth experiences stress as they leave familiar settings behind and struggle to
acculturate to their new country of residence (Salehi, 2010). Research has shown that immigrant youth have higher rates of mental health issues related
to negative migration expeirences. In addition, immgirants are at an increased risk for secondary school dropout as they face greater obstacles
compared to native youh in academic success (Anisef, Brown, Phythian, Sweet, & Walters, 2010). Thus, there is a need to aid immigrant youth in its
transition and assimilation process to reduce the likelihood of negative

Five Broken Cameras
Imagine living in a conflict that has divided two nations, literally, by a concrete barrier. This turbulent and heated confrontation has left many dead and
even more injured. Welcome to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The documentary "5 Broken Cameras" is a portrayal of this modern day dispute
through the personal lens of self–taught Palestinian cameraman, Emad Burnat. This compelling documentary provides a realistic presentation of the
hatred that surrounds these two divided nations. Movie viewers will be drawn to this film is because it demonstrates the harsh realities of what it is
like to live in the midst of a conflict and how the lives of those affected are altered as a result of this prolonged struggle. Burnat is certainly effective...
Rather, it demonstrates the first hand effects of families who have lived through travesty and hardship. By connecting the increased intensity of the
conflict and displaying it alongside Gibreel's growth, the audience is quickly drawn in and engaged in the film. Burnat successfully draws this
parallel in order to hit his message close to home and make sure that it sticks. His message is as follows: The political crisis that unites and separates
these two distinct cultures is not necessarily bound to be resolved soon, however, during the midst of this crisis, it is more than just politics that needs
to be exemplified and understood. Life needs to go

Arab Israeli Conflict
1.1 WHAT IS THE ARAB ISRAELI CONFLICT? The Arab
–Israeli conflict is a hotly contested issue both in the Middle East and the broader global
community.1 The modern conflict is essentially a dispute over the area known up until 1948 as Palestine, which is considered holy to all three major
monotheistic religions.2 The primary parties in the conflict are Israeli (formerly Zionist) Jews and Palestinian Arabs (who are predominately
Muslim).3 It is one of the unresolved problems bequeathed to the region by the British and French imperialist powers following the division of the
Ottoman Empire between them at the end of World War 1.4 There are many features of the Middle East, specifically Palestine, that account for the
interest and rivalry it... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The agreement carved up the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire and divided control of the region between the two superpowers. Britain's three
agreements were incompatible, and laid the foundations for future frustration and conflict.3 2.2 THE MANDATE PERIOD Following triumph in
World War 1, Britain was given a mandate to govern the Holy Land from the League of Nations, from 29 September 1923.13 In August 1929
violence erupted in Palestine between Muslims and Jews over access to the Western Wall in Jerusalem. Between 23 and 29 August, 133 Jews were
killed and 339 others were injured by Arabs. 110 Arabs were killed and 232 were also injured, many by British police trying to quash the riots.11 In
May 1936, the Arab community revolted again against British rule, demanding independence and opposing increasing Jewish immigration.8 During the
British mandate, the political landscape of Palestine was completely transformed.1 3.1 World War II Britain's policies changed drastically throughout
the early stages of the Arab Israeli conflict. Britain began to reconsidered her

Arab Israeli Conflict Dbq
The Arab Israeli conflict is one of the major dilemmas in the world in the modern history. Many political leaders assume that this is the most
complicated conflict around the world, even bigger than Cold War. During the 1960's and the 1970's, the Arab world decided to go with confrontation
and fight fire with fire. The Middle East became a war zone where all the Arab countries lined up to win back Palestine. However, the Israeli cabinet
was smart enough to maintain their presence in the Palestinian Land. Nevertheless, many Arabic Leaders did not manage the war against Israel
vigorously.
There were many other reasons that caused the tense relationship between Nasser and the western powers. However the Arab– Israeli conflict was the
biggest ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The declaration was written by the United Kingdom's Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour. The declaration was directed to the Zionist community
where it stated:
His Majesty's government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to
facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of
existing non–Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
This declaration triggered the hatred of the Arabs towards the Jewish people, ringing the bells of an unending war. This shows that Britain was the
biggest ally of the Jewish state during the early 20th century.
Soon the USA was able to substitute the British role. After WWII, the Jewish society were able to deliver the tragedy that took place in Germany;
they were able to influence the ultimate powers in the world, convening them that the Nazis tortured the Jewish people and burned them down to death
during the Holocaust. Therefore the Jewish people were able to gain the sympathy of all Europe and the USA. The Jews were really clever in utilizing
this event to sustain Palestine. They convinced the world that they are the population that was labored throughout history; and all they are asking for is
to live peacefully in their holly land. Furthermore, many of the six

The Arab-Israeli Conflict Essay
Name 1
Your Name
Pol 340–01
March 20, 2008
Term Paper
The Arab– Israeli Conflict
The Arab– Israeli Conflict is a conflict between the Arab and Jewish people in the Middle East over Israel and Palestine. This conflict has led to wars
and millions of displaced people. This particular conflict has historical origins in the lives of the Arab and Jewish people. "The beginning of Zionism
and the Arab–Israeli Conflict explain the basic principles of this complicated dispute"(Frankel 17). During the course of history, different groups have
invaded Israel and Palestine. The area is historically the homeland of the Jewish people who migrated to the area in the thirteenth century as Hebrew
tribes. These Hebrew tribes are ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Between 1920 and 1921 clashes arose between the Arabs and Jews and equal amounts of people were killed on both sides.
After World War II the conflict between the Arabs and Jews over Palestine caused the British to release their mandate over Palestine. The British
requested that the United Nations determine the fate of Palestine. The UN determined that the country would have to be divided in order to meet the
needs of both the Jewish and Arab people. In 1947 the UN determined that there should be a partition of two states, one Jewish state and one Arab
state. The land was divided so that each state would have a majority of its own population, although some of the Jewish state would fall under the
Palestinian state and some of the Palestinian state would fall under the Jewish state. Jerusalem and Bethlehem were determined to be an international
zone. The Zionist Jewish people
Name 4 accepted the partition and the Arab people did not. The Arab people felt that because the Jewish people received a little more territory that
the land was divided unequally. The UN claim that the land was divided the way that it was because the Jewish people were the majority and the

idea that more people would migrate to the Jewish territory for the blended border lines was the reason for allowing the Jewish people more space.
"Fighting began between the Arab and Jewish residents of Palestine days

Israeli People Conspiracy Theories
It is often believed that people have used animals to do different tasks. Today we are going to look at some conspiracy theories about the Israeli
people and how they used animals to do their dirty work. It is believed that the Israeli people have use animals from different species. Some of the
species are; birds, mammals, and reptiles. People have become suspicious of these animals released by the Israeli government. The Israeli people
have been accused of using lizards to spy on nuclear programs. A former chief of the Iran military, Hassan Firuzabadi, said the military used lizards
because they "attract atomic waves." People have also accused Israelis of using dolphins, equipped with cameras and killer arrows. A few years ago in
2015, an

Israeli Palestinian Conflict
The Israeli– Palestinian conflict, which arguably began following the creation of Israel in the mid–twentieth century after the Second World War, traces
its roots back down to concepts such as zionism and arab nationalism that developed throughout the century, and through injustices dealt by both sides,
manages to reap on the lives of countless individuals, regardless of religious and racial affiliation. Although one can argue for the case of one side over
the other, not one position seems to be more justified in their actions, as both angles depict strong rationale and, on the other hand, illustrate tenuous
inequity expanded or eliminated through emotionally driven biases and framing, In spite of both sides being both warranted and unreasonable,... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If, for example, most people are aligned with a particular atmosphere surrounding an aspect of a definite conception, but, if for some reason one
person may not completely agree with the idea, they are more likely to follow the tide instead of speaking out because assertiveness on a unpopular
standpoint can result in gradual ostracization. This is because humans are naturally social creatures, and by social cues, humans are guided as norms
present what is appropriate to a given society; by asserting an avoided stance on a thought, one can easily be disregarded if there is no support given
by culture. Staying impressionable to society is safe in most every way, and is done by generalizations (i.e. thin slicing). However, environments can
present limitations as not all information is credible, nor is the information sustainable– it is flexible, which can smoothy muddle the boundaries of
what is socially acceptable. In addition, generalizations can feed into negative labels that can push violence and bigotry without any objective

The War On Israeli Occupation
War is generally considered a to be a heinous act, a harbinger of death, destruction and disaster. War is often fought for ignorant reasons such as
wealth and property, although defence and fighting for the greater good is often exhibited through history. Its facile to claim that war is unjustifiable
under personal or political reasons, or that it's a waste of human life and that passive resistance is the key. Nevertheless, in opposition, there are
particular circumstances in which war is justifiable. Examples of this are: Under international bodies of law (Geneva and Haug conventions), the
principals of the 'just war theory' which is in stark contrast to 2 other approaches on the concept of war, being 'Pacifism' and 'Realism', as well as
Islamic reasoning on the conduct, "darurah" (necessity) and justifications of initiating or continuing conflict as well as theoretical and historical
understandings of what it means for a war to be just. An ongoing example being the war on Israeli occupation by the Palestinians, another example
being the British interference in the Second World War against the belligerent Nazi regime. Although, in retrospect, the Second World War is also used
in pacifist ideologies, against war justification. Various academic enumerations interpret and apply the renowned "just war Theory" including Peter
S.Temes's "The just war: an American reflection on the morality of war in our times as well as discussions on the Islamic etiquettes of war in Youssef H.

Israeli Security Concerns

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Nicole Gethers

More from Nicole Gethers (13)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Israeli Security Concerns