Drinking Source Water
Protection in Ontario
Rupesh Udash
Bakhtiyor Mukhammadiev
July 2, 2014
Green Economy Bridging Program
CKSS 100: Fundamentals in Sustainability I
Community MicroSkills Development & Ryerson University
“The first barrier to the
contamination of drinking water
involves protecting the sources of
drinking water.”
- Justice Dennis O'Connor, Walkerton Inquiry 2002
The Walkerton Tragedy
 In May 2000, the Walkerton water
supply became contaminated with E.
coli: 2321 people became ill due to
contamination (1346 people were
treated, and 7 died from their illness)
 Leading up to the tragedy:
 Regulatory shortcomings
 Technology deficits
 Insufficient training and knowledge
 Privatization of water testing
 Budget cuts to Ontario Ministry of
the Environment
 Human negligence
The Walkerton Water Tower
Escherichia coli
Response to the Walkerton Tragedy
 Part One of the Walkerton Commission of Inquiry:
– Improper operating practices by the Walkerton
Public Utilities Commission and lack of regulatory
and compliance obligations by the Ontario
Government
– Total estimated damage: $64.5-155 million
 Part Two of the Walkerton Commission of Inquiry:
 The Commission recommended that Ontario
residents be guaranteed by law that their tap
water is safe
 The Ontario Government to spend $329 million to
make the water safe
 The Ontario Ministry of the Environment to
establish an agency to oversee water safety
The Multi-barrier Approach
Source Water
Protection -the
first step in multi
barrier approach
Drinking Source Water Protection
 Protection of municipal supplies at source-first line of defence.
 Source protection one of the most effective and reliable method
for clean drinking water.
 Important for communities that have no access to municipal
supplies.
 It focuses on protecting water before it enters the drinking
water treatment system.
 Clean Water Act 2006 legally mandates source water protection
in Ontario.
Clean Water Act, 2006
 Clean Water Act came into force in 2006, as a direct response to the Walkerton
incident.
 CWA addressed the recommendations of Justice O’Connor’s Report regarding
source water protection and laid down the legal framework for source water
protection in Ontario.
 As a key requirement of the act, by 2007, source protection areas, source
protection regions and 19 corresponding source protection committees (SPC)
were established all over Ontario.
 CWA requires development of source water protection plans at the watershed
level developed in partnership with local stakeholders.
 Source Protection Committee is responsible for developing the plan and MoE is
responsible for approving the source protection plan.
Source Protection Boundaries in Ontario
19 source protection regions, 40 source protection area
CTC Source Protection Region
– The CTC SPR is one of 19 source protection regions in Ontario
– 3 source protection areas
The CTC Source Protection Region
Stakeholder Map:
The CTC Source Water Protection Region
Municipalities:
27 local and 7
regional/county
municipalities
Economic Sectors:
land, golf course,
agriculture, energy,
petrochemical
Public Sector:
environmental NGOs,
citizens at large
Liaison Members:
TRCA, Ministry of the
Environment, Toronto
Public Health
The Toronto and Region Source Protection Area
1 of the three source protection areas of CTC
Surface Water Source: TRSPA
97% of
residents
11
Intakes
Lake Ontario Water Intakes
1 Lakeview WTP Intake
2 RL Clark Intake
3 Toronto Island Intakes
4 RC Harris Intakes
5 FJ Horgan Intake
6 Ajax Intake
11 intakes in total
Ground Water Source: TRSPA
3% of
Residents
21 Wells
Drinking Water Threats
• What are the drinking water threats in TRSPA?
• Drinking water threats as defined by Clean Water Act:
“an activity or condition that adversely affects or has the potential to adversely
affect the quality or quantity of any water that is or may be used as a source of
drinking water”
Sewage Treatment
Plants
Pesticide/fertilizers
Application/Storage/ Handling of
agricultural source material
Application of road salt
Waste Disposal Sites Handling/storage of fuel
Livestock grazing
Organic solventStorage of SnowDe-icing of aircrafts
Source Water Threat-TRSPA
 Drinking water threat within TRSPA is reported in the legally mandated
TRSPA Assessment Report-Jan 2012.
 Water Quantity: Lake Ontario, which supplies most of the drinking water
within TRSPA, is exempt from threats related to water quantity.
 Water Quality (groundwater & surface): A total of 456 of significant
drinking water quality threats are identified within TRSPA, including
scenarios of disinfection failures at WTP, E. coli release from industrial
facilities, sanitary trunk sewer breaks, spill of gasoline as a result of
pipeline break, etc.
 Non of the significant threats in the delineated vulnerable areas.
Vulnerable Areas-Municipal Supplies
Groundwater Intake (Wellhead protection areas)
No significant water quality threats
in delineated vulnerable areas
Vulnerable Areas - Municipal Supplies
Surface Water Intake (Intake protection zones)
No significant water quality threats
in delineated vulnerable areas
Drinking Water Source and Sustainability
If there is an insufficient water quantity, the cost of water could
consequently rise and then there is an issue of social justice and
economic vitality.
If there is an inadequate water quality due to microbial or other
contamination, human health could be affected.
If there is a water problem in one community, it may become a
problem for other communities that partner in the provision of water
(water is often a shared resource between communities).
Sustainable Drinking Water Supply
If a person can turn the tap on over 15 or 20 years time and the water
comes out at the same rate and quality, and at the same cost, as the
day the system was commissioned, then it is a sustainable supply.
Ontario Drinking Water Safety Net
Source to tap
focus
Strong
legislative
and
regulatory
framework
Multifaceted
compliance
improvement
toolkit
Health-based
standards for
drinking
water
Regular and
reliable
water testing
Partnership,
transparency
and public
engagement
Mandatory
licensing,
operator
certification
and training
requirements
Swift, strong
action on
adverse
water quality
incidents
WATERPROOF 3:
Canada’s Drinking Water Report Card (2011)
In Canada, Ontario has the most well –funded and ambitious
Program to protect source water. Ontario’s standards for
treatment, testing, standards and reporting are stronger than
other Canadian jurisdictions.
References
1. http://www.cba.org/cba/cle/PDF/ENV11_Abouchar_paper.pdf
2. http://www.ctcswp.ca/files/TRSPA_Chapter6_Jan2012.pdf
3. http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/source/regs/english/2007/elaws_src_regs_r07284_e.htm
4. http://environmentalbeginnings.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Walkerton-Tragedy.pdf
5. http://www.ctcswp.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/RPT_20120118_ApprovedTRSPA-
AR_forweb.pdf
6. http://www.conservation-ontario.on.ca/what-we-do/source-water-protection
7. http://www.trca.on.ca/the-living-city/water-flood-management/source-protection.dot
8. https://www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/drinking-water
9. http://www.pollutionprobe.org/report/swpprimer.pdf
10. http://www.ryerson.ca/~awelling/documents/Wellington_Walkerton_Chronology.pdf
11. http://www.ecojustice.ca/publications/files/waterproof-3

Drinking Source Water Protection in Ontario June 2014

  • 1.
    Drinking Source Water Protectionin Ontario Rupesh Udash Bakhtiyor Mukhammadiev July 2, 2014 Green Economy Bridging Program CKSS 100: Fundamentals in Sustainability I Community MicroSkills Development & Ryerson University
  • 2.
    “The first barrierto the contamination of drinking water involves protecting the sources of drinking water.” - Justice Dennis O'Connor, Walkerton Inquiry 2002
  • 3.
    The Walkerton Tragedy In May 2000, the Walkerton water supply became contaminated with E. coli: 2321 people became ill due to contamination (1346 people were treated, and 7 died from their illness)  Leading up to the tragedy:  Regulatory shortcomings  Technology deficits  Insufficient training and knowledge  Privatization of water testing  Budget cuts to Ontario Ministry of the Environment  Human negligence The Walkerton Water Tower Escherichia coli
  • 4.
    Response to theWalkerton Tragedy  Part One of the Walkerton Commission of Inquiry: – Improper operating practices by the Walkerton Public Utilities Commission and lack of regulatory and compliance obligations by the Ontario Government – Total estimated damage: $64.5-155 million  Part Two of the Walkerton Commission of Inquiry:  The Commission recommended that Ontario residents be guaranteed by law that their tap water is safe  The Ontario Government to spend $329 million to make the water safe  The Ontario Ministry of the Environment to establish an agency to oversee water safety
  • 5.
    The Multi-barrier Approach SourceWater Protection -the first step in multi barrier approach
  • 6.
    Drinking Source WaterProtection  Protection of municipal supplies at source-first line of defence.  Source protection one of the most effective and reliable method for clean drinking water.  Important for communities that have no access to municipal supplies.  It focuses on protecting water before it enters the drinking water treatment system.  Clean Water Act 2006 legally mandates source water protection in Ontario.
  • 7.
    Clean Water Act,2006  Clean Water Act came into force in 2006, as a direct response to the Walkerton incident.  CWA addressed the recommendations of Justice O’Connor’s Report regarding source water protection and laid down the legal framework for source water protection in Ontario.  As a key requirement of the act, by 2007, source protection areas, source protection regions and 19 corresponding source protection committees (SPC) were established all over Ontario.  CWA requires development of source water protection plans at the watershed level developed in partnership with local stakeholders.  Source Protection Committee is responsible for developing the plan and MoE is responsible for approving the source protection plan.
  • 8.
    Source Protection Boundariesin Ontario 19 source protection regions, 40 source protection area
  • 9.
    CTC Source ProtectionRegion – The CTC SPR is one of 19 source protection regions in Ontario – 3 source protection areas
  • 10.
    The CTC SourceProtection Region
  • 11.
    Stakeholder Map: The CTCSource Water Protection Region Municipalities: 27 local and 7 regional/county municipalities Economic Sectors: land, golf course, agriculture, energy, petrochemical Public Sector: environmental NGOs, citizens at large Liaison Members: TRCA, Ministry of the Environment, Toronto Public Health
  • 12.
    The Toronto andRegion Source Protection Area 1 of the three source protection areas of CTC
  • 13.
    Surface Water Source:TRSPA 97% of residents 11 Intakes Lake Ontario Water Intakes 1 Lakeview WTP Intake 2 RL Clark Intake 3 Toronto Island Intakes 4 RC Harris Intakes 5 FJ Horgan Intake 6 Ajax Intake 11 intakes in total
  • 14.
    Ground Water Source:TRSPA 3% of Residents 21 Wells
  • 15.
    Drinking Water Threats •What are the drinking water threats in TRSPA? • Drinking water threats as defined by Clean Water Act: “an activity or condition that adversely affects or has the potential to adversely affect the quality or quantity of any water that is or may be used as a source of drinking water” Sewage Treatment Plants Pesticide/fertilizers Application/Storage/ Handling of agricultural source material Application of road salt Waste Disposal Sites Handling/storage of fuel Livestock grazing Organic solventStorage of SnowDe-icing of aircrafts
  • 16.
    Source Water Threat-TRSPA Drinking water threat within TRSPA is reported in the legally mandated TRSPA Assessment Report-Jan 2012.  Water Quantity: Lake Ontario, which supplies most of the drinking water within TRSPA, is exempt from threats related to water quantity.  Water Quality (groundwater & surface): A total of 456 of significant drinking water quality threats are identified within TRSPA, including scenarios of disinfection failures at WTP, E. coli release from industrial facilities, sanitary trunk sewer breaks, spill of gasoline as a result of pipeline break, etc.  Non of the significant threats in the delineated vulnerable areas.
  • 17.
    Vulnerable Areas-Municipal Supplies GroundwaterIntake (Wellhead protection areas) No significant water quality threats in delineated vulnerable areas
  • 18.
    Vulnerable Areas -Municipal Supplies Surface Water Intake (Intake protection zones) No significant water quality threats in delineated vulnerable areas
  • 19.
    Drinking Water Sourceand Sustainability If there is an insufficient water quantity, the cost of water could consequently rise and then there is an issue of social justice and economic vitality. If there is an inadequate water quality due to microbial or other contamination, human health could be affected. If there is a water problem in one community, it may become a problem for other communities that partner in the provision of water (water is often a shared resource between communities). Sustainable Drinking Water Supply If a person can turn the tap on over 15 or 20 years time and the water comes out at the same rate and quality, and at the same cost, as the day the system was commissioned, then it is a sustainable supply.
  • 20.
    Ontario Drinking WaterSafety Net Source to tap focus Strong legislative and regulatory framework Multifaceted compliance improvement toolkit Health-based standards for drinking water Regular and reliable water testing Partnership, transparency and public engagement Mandatory licensing, operator certification and training requirements Swift, strong action on adverse water quality incidents
  • 21.
    WATERPROOF 3: Canada’s DrinkingWater Report Card (2011) In Canada, Ontario has the most well –funded and ambitious Program to protect source water. Ontario’s standards for treatment, testing, standards and reporting are stronger than other Canadian jurisdictions.
  • 22.
    References 1. http://www.cba.org/cba/cle/PDF/ENV11_Abouchar_paper.pdf 2. http://www.ctcswp.ca/files/TRSPA_Chapter6_Jan2012.pdf 3.http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/source/regs/english/2007/elaws_src_regs_r07284_e.htm 4. http://environmentalbeginnings.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Walkerton-Tragedy.pdf 5. http://www.ctcswp.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/RPT_20120118_ApprovedTRSPA- AR_forweb.pdf 6. http://www.conservation-ontario.on.ca/what-we-do/source-water-protection 7. http://www.trca.on.ca/the-living-city/water-flood-management/source-protection.dot 8. https://www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/drinking-water 9. http://www.pollutionprobe.org/report/swpprimer.pdf 10. http://www.ryerson.ca/~awelling/documents/Wellington_Walkerton_Chronology.pdf 11. http://www.ecojustice.ca/publications/files/waterproof-3