wdwd

3. CLIENT’S BRIEF
CLIENT’S PROFILE
CLIENT: Taylor’s University Lakeside Campus
Representative: Ms Alia Ahmad, Ar Sateerah and Ar Emmanuel
BRIEF
To propose a new recreational area.
To manage and facilitate any future outdoor activities for staff and students
To create a common bond within the campus community.
BUDGET: RM 1,500,000.00
SPACES TO BE PROVIDED (Indoor and partially outdoor)
• Office(max 3 person)
• Lounge
• Toilets (2 units each M/F)
• Indoor/outdoor recreation area(darts, carom, congkak, table tennis, table games –monopoly, scrabble etc.
• Cafeteria (20 people)
• Magazine corner

4. BRIEF
STRUCTURE
• Light weight, fast construction
• (container design is allowed)
MATERIAL
• Insulated wall
• Finishes, fixtures with good quality and workmanship
EXISTING CONDITION
• Existing large trees to remain undisturbed
THEME
• Contemporary
• Low energy (natural ventilation, lighting)
• Reusable energy (rain water harvesting)
MECHANICAL REQUIREMENT
• Air Cond (only if necessary)
• Low energy light fittings
LANDSCAPE
• Trees, shrubs (for boundary)
• Turf
• Outdoor tiles/paving

5. SITE

6. SITE
Land Tittle:
Beside Block D at Jalan
Taylor’s 47500 Subang
Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan
Property Type:
Taylor’s Carpark
Land Type:
Free hold
Land Status:
Open carpark
Coordinates:
3°03'52.5"N 101°37'05.4"E

7. S.WO.T. ANALYSIS
Large open & peaceful site
Nice view and vista
Waterbody nearby solves
problem for drainage during
rainy condition
STRENGTH
Separated from main building
blocks
Unutilized open space
Poor land condition
Provide more natural shading
Provide point of interest at
carpark area
Provide interactive pavilion to
attract people
Noise production during
construction affects study
environment of students
Traffic congestion caused during
construction
Pollution of river and car may
contaminate the space and cause
unpleasant smell
WEAKNESS OPPORTUNITY THREAT

10. Our vision is to become a creative interactive pavilion where everyone congregate and converge together by
offering the community a platform for sharing and exchanging.
The pavilion comprises of various public realm such as the lobby, cafeteria, activity room, collaborative
workspace, mini office, event venues, pocket parks and washroom.
It is designed to interlink the campus blocks and the car park area while injecting positive life. The design
emphasizes on sustainability and inside out relation
WEEK 1-4
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DESIGN STATEMENT

11. CASE STUDY
PROJECT: ROYAL WOLF, AUSTRALIA
ARCHITECTS: BDP
Semi-enclosed market hall Changing of levelCity lifestyle
Offer affordable and flexible conditions for different programs
WEEK 1-4

12. PROJECT: BOXPARK CROYDON, UK
ARCHITECTS: ROOM 11
Re-used material Naked raw materialPlanted internal courtyard
Clustered typology of modular units encourages interaction
WEEK 1-4

13. CONTAINERS STUDY
20’ Container 40’ Container
Pros
• Eco friendly
• Cost efficient
• Durable
• Easily available
• Modular
• Recyclable
Cons
• Challenging heat control
• Deterioration under a shorter
time compared to concrete
buildings
• Requires skilled workers
• Health hazard
Problem Solving
• Have green landscaping around
and in the building
• Insulate with weather-proof
materials and paint
• Hire local skilled workers for
construction
• Sandblast off-site
WEEK 1-4

14. MATERIALITY
INSULATED SHIPPING CONTAINER COMPOSITE TIMBER DECKING
TIMBER FLOORING TILED RESTROOM FLOOR
• Maintain consistent internal temperature
• Cost & energy saving as the building
• Depend less on mechanical ventilation.
• Easy and clean installation
• Requires no painting, no glue and low
maintenance
• Easily sourced locally, reused timber
• Warm and welcoming feeling
• Durable
• Easy to maintain
• Hygienic
WEEK 1-4

15. DESIGN STRATEGIES
WEEK 1-4

16. WEEK 5-16
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS

17. WEEK 5-16

18. FRONT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
WEEK 5-16

19. EAST ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION
WEEK 5-16

20. SECTION A-A
SECTION B-B
WEEK 5-16

21. SPATIAL VISUALIZATION
WEEK 5-16

22. WEEK 5-16

23. WEEK 5-16

24. WEEK 5-16

25. WEEK 5-16

26. WEEK 5-16

31. Category Name % Price(RM)
Operational Expenditure & Cost of Development
Authority 2 10,000.00
Prelimary Cost 4 200,000.00
Contingency Cost 5 30,000.00
Material Wastage Cost 2 10,000.00
GST 6 300,000.00
Total 550,000.00
Category Name % Price(RM)
Construction Cost
Architectural 10 50,000.00
Civil & Structural Engineering 12 60,000.00
Mechanical & Electrical
Engineering 12 60,000.00
Landscape Architecture 8 40,000.00
Total 210,000.00
Category Name % Price(RM)
Other Costing
Labour Cost 2 15,000.00
Sub-contractor cost 4 60,000.00
Total 75,000.00
TOTAL: RM 835,000.00
Schematic Design
Cost estimation from sketch design
WEEK 2

32. ITEM DESCRIPTION RM
1Building Works 240,960.38
2Architectural 71,293.04
3M&E 82,627.71
4Landscape 276,201.00
5Others 62,248.00
6material and wastage 10,000.00
7Contingency cost 30,000.00
8authority 10,000.00
9Preliminary cost 42,622.84
TOTAL 825,952.97
goods and services tax(GST) 6% 49557.17
TOTAL CARRIED FROM TENDER 875,510.15
Design Development
Summarised Cost Breakdown
WEEK 11-16

33. 14%
46%
12%
16%
12%
OVERALL BUDGET DISTRIBUTION
Architectural Civil and Structural Landscape Mechanical And Electrical others
WEEK 11-16

34. Cost Breakdown
Total 6% is allocated for consultants
COMPANY PROFESSION PERCENT TOTAL FEE
1NHB STUDIO SDN BHD
architect &
landscape 3% 26265.30
2A.K.K.L CORP. c&s engineer 1.50% 13132.65
3JOHNFENG SDN BHD
project
manager 1% 8755.10
4ED KINGDOM CORP. M&e engineer 1% 8755.10
5YX QS CONSULT
quantity
surveyor 0.50% 4377.55
TOTAL 61,285.71
WEEK 16

35. THE END