SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 19
PROBLEM-BASED
  LEARNING
     IN
  TEACHER
 EDUCATION
What is Problem-Based Learning?

   a pedagogical methodology by which
learning is initiated with a posed problem


Students assume a role in the problem scenario and
are led through a process in which they:

a) pose questions, “learning issues,” identifying what
   they need to know in order to address the problem
b) rank the learning issues in terms of importance and
   decide who will investigate which issue
c)   identify needed resources and where they might be
     found
d) gather needed information through individual and
   group investigation
What is Problem-Based Learning?

   a pedagogical methodology by which
learning is initiated with a posed problem


Students assume a role in the problem scenario and
are led through a process in which they:

e) reconvene to integrate information
f)   generate and evaluate possible solutions
g) make needed decisions or take agreed upon actions
h) communicate results as appropriate for problem
   resolution
i)   step out of role to debrief on problem solving
     experience
What is Problem-Based Learning?
 The “flow” of problem-based learning:


                 Problem
                Engagement




                 Inquiry and
                Investigation

                    problem
                    definition




                  Problem
                 Resolution




                  Problem        Stepien & Gallagher
                 Debriefing
What is Problem-Based Learning?
As distinguished from Project-Based Learning:



                                   Product
             Project-Based         emphasis

                                    Process
                Problem-            emphasis
                 Based
What is Problem-Based Learning?

Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is characterized by:


meaningful activity – PBL engages students in problems
   that are designed to be realistic, intriguing, and
   relevant to the field of study. Meaningful problems
   thus serve as the context and the stimulus for
   knowledge-building and critical thinking.
situated learning – PBL creates an environment that
    permits students to work on the kinds of problems
    that professionals encounter and to use the
    perspectives, the knowledge, and the skills that
    professionals use in attempting to solve them.
What is Problem-Based Learning?

Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is characterized by:


open-ended generative tasks – PBL engages students in
   an ill-structured, open-ended problem for which
   there is no prescribed approach or solution.
   Students become intentional learners as they
   generate their own questions, plans, and goals.
collaborative decision-making and problem-solving –
     PBL encourages students to work together in their
     problem solving and product development. Students
     collaborate with each other and with more
     knowledgeable individuals who model expert
     behaviors and lend assistance as students try out
     skills on their own.
What is Problem-Based Learning?

Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is characterized by:


changed role of the instructor -- Instructors act as
   metacognitive coaches throughout the PBL process.
   They model and coach, giving students guidance as
   needed, but encouraging student independence in
   goal setting and decision-making.
Why Use Problem-Based Learning?


It represents the way learning occurs in
the world outside the classroom.

   Some theorists, those who ascribe to situated
cognition and activity theory in particular, claim
that learning occurs only within the context of
activity and is securely tied to the situation in
which it occurs (e.g. Anderson, Reder, & Simon,
1996; Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Lave,
1988).
Why Use Problem-Based Learning?


It is engaging and, therefore, motivating.
    Writing about project-based learning, a term
often used interchangeably with problem-based
learning, Berliner (1992) notes:

    Intertwined with the cognitive components associated
    with projects are the motivational components inherent
    in projects. These include the fact that projects teach
    students to be mastery-oriented, not ability-oriented;
    they teach students to be learning-oriented rather than
    performance-oriented; and they teach students to be
    task-involved rather than ego-involved…When there is
    some degree of choice for the students, project-based
    methods motivate students more than any other
    teaching method I know about. (pp. 10-11)
Why Use Problem-Based Learning?


It increases the likelihood of transfer, a
primary consideration in teacher education.
   The literature on transfer suggests that transferable
learning experiences occur in an environment
characterized by:
• Meaningful activity
• Expert guidance
• Knowledge-building collaboration
Why Use Problem-Based Learning?


It promotes desirable student outcomes:


• Intentional learning
• Relational understanding
• Critical thinking
• Creative thinking
• Effective collaboration
• Versatile communication
How Can Problem-Based
     Learning Be Assessed?

   by using multiple means to measure
acquisition of knowledge, skills, and dispositions

  To Assess                   Product                  Method
  Knowledge                   Concept maps             Expert map-based scheme
   Interrelationships among   Unit products            Rubrics
  facts, concepts             Written/oral responses   SOLO taxonomy
  (Relational                 Traditional tests        Scoring guides
  understanding)

  Skills                      Unit products and/or
  Critical thinking            performances            Rubrics
  Creative thinking           Written/oral responses   SOLO taxonomy
  Effective collaboration     Observation              Rubrics
  Versatile communication     Self-ratings             Self-reports
                              Peer ratings             Likert scales

  Dispositions                Problem logs             Content analysis
  Intentional learning        Observation              Rubrics
How Do We Use Problem-Based
 Learning in Teacher Education?
  to model PBL as an approach that we ask
our students to use in their teaching

 MODEL         >     COACH          >     FADE

 Cognitive apprenticeship (Collins, Brown, &
 Newman, 1989) provides the theoretical basis of
 our approach to using PBL in methods classes.
 First, we model the use of PBL by using it.
 Next, we coach students as they develop their
 own PBL units to use with their students.
 Last, with each unit students develop we lend
 less direct assistance, i.e., we fade instruction.
How Do We Feel About Using
     PBL in Teacher Education?

    It’s different!
    • Student driven
    • Problems prompt, rather than follow, skill
      development
                          It’s hard!
                          • Developing a “good” problem*
                          • Consistent use of guided inquiry
                          • Giving up control
 It’s time-consuming!
 • Planning
                              It’s wonderful!
 • Implementing
                              • High engagement
                              • Self-directed learning

* See note.
References

Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and
  education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction.
   In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of
   Robert Glaser (pp. 361-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Berliner, D. C. (1992). Redesigning classroom activities for the future. Educational
   Technology, 32(5), 7-13.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of
   learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem-soving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.)
  Human abilities: An information-processing approach (pp. 227-250). New York:
  W. H. Freeman & Co.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (CTGV). (1990). Anchored instruction
  and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2-10.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching
  the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing,
  learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp.453-494).
  Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
References

Hattie, J., & Purdie, N. (1998). The SOLO model: Addressing fundamental
  measurement issues. In B. Dart & G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Teaching and learning
  in higher education. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.
Howard, J. (2002). Technology-enhanced project-based learning in teacher education:
  Addressing the goals of transfer. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,
  10(3), 343-364.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday
  life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Niedelman, M. (1991). Problem solving and transfer. Journal of Learning
   Disabilities, 24(6), 322-329.
Rye, J. A., & Rubba, P. A. (2002). Scoring concept maps: An expert map-based scheme
  weighted for relationships. School Science & Mathematics, 102(1), 33-44.
Skemp, R. R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding.
   Arithmetic Teacher, 26(3), 9-15.
Stepien, W.J., & Pyke, S.L. (1997). Designing problem-based learning units. Journal
   for the Education of the Gifted, 29(4), 380-400.
Related Reading

Bereiter, C. (1997). Situated cognition and how to overcome it. In D. Kirshner & J.A.
  Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological
  perspectives (pp. 281-300). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., & Palinscar A.
   (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the
   learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 369-398.
Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (1991). Activities as instructional tools: A framework for
   analysis and evaluation. Educational Researcher, 20(4), 9-23.
Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). The power of problem-based learning.
  Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Gallagher, S.A., Sher, B.T., Stepien, W.J., & Workman, D. (1995). Implementing
  problem-based learning in science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics,
  95(3), 136-146.
Hannafin, M.J., Hall, C., Land, S., & Hill, J. (1994). Learning in open-ended
  environments: Assumptions, methods, and implications. Educational Technology,
  34(5), 48-55.
Hung, D., & Wong, A. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for project work in
  learning environments. Educational Technology, 40(2), 33-37.
Judith B. Howard, Ph.D.
 School of Education
Elon University
March 2003

More Related Content

What's hot

Backwards Design & Melding In-Class and Online Pedagogies
Backwards Design & Melding In-Class and Online PedagogiesBackwards Design & Melding In-Class and Online Pedagogies
Backwards Design & Melding In-Class and Online PedagogiesAndy Saltarelli
 
Timperley: Teacher Professiona Learning and Development
Timperley: Teacher Professiona Learning and DevelopmentTimperley: Teacher Professiona Learning and Development
Timperley: Teacher Professiona Learning and Developmentpedagogmalmo
 
PGCAP cohort 2: week 6 - assessing and feeding back
PGCAP cohort 2: week 6 - assessing and feeding backPGCAP cohort 2: week 6 - assessing and feeding back
PGCAP cohort 2: week 6 - assessing and feeding backAcademic Development
 
"MFS appraoach of Synectics Model
"MFS appraoach of Synectics Model"MFS appraoach of Synectics Model
"MFS appraoach of Synectics Modeluttamthakur123
 
Atl for myp newcomers
Atl for myp newcomersAtl for myp newcomers
Atl for myp newcomersCindy Farmer
 
PYP Parent Chinese
PYP Parent ChinesePYP Parent Chinese
PYP Parent ChineseMaria Tran
 
Spice up your lecture with Inquiry-based Learning
Spice up your lecture with Inquiry-based LearningSpice up your lecture with Inquiry-based Learning
Spice up your lecture with Inquiry-based LearningICPSR
 
Class worksintroobjectivestransitions
Class worksintroobjectivestransitionsClass worksintroobjectivestransitions
Class worksintroobjectivestransitionsLeslie Suters
 
Pbl and 21st century skills
Pbl and 21st century skillsPbl and 21st century skills
Pbl and 21st century skillsDr. Daniel Downs
 
LEARNING VARIATION INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
LEARNING VARIATION INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNLEARNING VARIATION INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
LEARNING VARIATION INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNIjaz Ahmad
 
Hilda taba’s inductive thinking model
Hilda taba’s inductive thinking modelHilda taba’s inductive thinking model
Hilda taba’s inductive thinking modelsudha pandeya/pathak
 
Approaches to learning (atl)
Approaches to learning (atl)Approaches to learning (atl)
Approaches to learning (atl)Rory Galvin
 
Learning approaches
Learning approachesLearning approaches
Learning approachesUmme Habiba
 
From Thinking Skills To Thinking Classrooms
From Thinking Skills To Thinking ClassroomsFrom Thinking Skills To Thinking Classrooms
From Thinking Skills To Thinking ClassroomsIsabelle Jones
 

What's hot (20)

Backwards Design & Melding In-Class and Online Pedagogies
Backwards Design & Melding In-Class and Online PedagogiesBackwards Design & Melding In-Class and Online Pedagogies
Backwards Design & Melding In-Class and Online Pedagogies
 
Chapter 2 marzano
Chapter 2 marzanoChapter 2 marzano
Chapter 2 marzano
 
Inductive thinking theory
Inductive thinking theoryInductive thinking theory
Inductive thinking theory
 
Timperley: Teacher Professiona Learning and Development
Timperley: Teacher Professiona Learning and DevelopmentTimperley: Teacher Professiona Learning and Development
Timperley: Teacher Professiona Learning and Development
 
Is db
Is dbIs db
Is db
 
PGCAP cohort 2: week 6 - assessing and feeding back
PGCAP cohort 2: week 6 - assessing and feeding backPGCAP cohort 2: week 6 - assessing and feeding back
PGCAP cohort 2: week 6 - assessing and feeding back
 
"MFS appraoach of Synectics Model
"MFS appraoach of Synectics Model"MFS appraoach of Synectics Model
"MFS appraoach of Synectics Model
 
Chapter 3 marzano
Chapter 3 marzanoChapter 3 marzano
Chapter 3 marzano
 
Atl for myp newcomers
Atl for myp newcomersAtl for myp newcomers
Atl for myp newcomers
 
PYP Parent Chinese
PYP Parent ChinesePYP Parent Chinese
PYP Parent Chinese
 
Spice up your lecture with Inquiry-based Learning
Spice up your lecture with Inquiry-based LearningSpice up your lecture with Inquiry-based Learning
Spice up your lecture with Inquiry-based Learning
 
Module 5. blooms taxonomy
Module 5. blooms taxonomyModule 5. blooms taxonomy
Module 5. blooms taxonomy
 
Class worksintroobjectivestransitions
Class worksintroobjectivestransitionsClass worksintroobjectivestransitions
Class worksintroobjectivestransitions
 
Pbl and 21st century skills
Pbl and 21st century skillsPbl and 21st century skills
Pbl and 21st century skills
 
Community
CommunityCommunity
Community
 
LEARNING VARIATION INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
LEARNING VARIATION INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNLEARNING VARIATION INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
LEARNING VARIATION INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
 
Hilda taba’s inductive thinking model
Hilda taba’s inductive thinking modelHilda taba’s inductive thinking model
Hilda taba’s inductive thinking model
 
Approaches to learning (atl)
Approaches to learning (atl)Approaches to learning (atl)
Approaches to learning (atl)
 
Learning approaches
Learning approachesLearning approaches
Learning approaches
 
From Thinking Skills To Thinking Classrooms
From Thinking Skills To Thinking ClassroomsFrom Thinking Skills To Thinking Classrooms
From Thinking Skills To Thinking Classrooms
 

Viewers also liked

Evelyne Huytebroeck - Governare Green
Evelyne Huytebroeck - Governare GreenEvelyne Huytebroeck - Governare Green
Evelyne Huytebroeck - Governare GreenGianfranco Mascia
 
Agr análise e gerenciamento riscos - 02748 - [ e 1 ]
Agr   análise e gerenciamento riscos - 02748 - [ e 1 ]Agr   análise e gerenciamento riscos - 02748 - [ e 1 ]
Agr análise e gerenciamento riscos - 02748 - [ e 1 ]Sergio Salinet
 
Presentasi sisitem-operasi
Presentasi sisitem-operasiPresentasi sisitem-operasi
Presentasi sisitem-operasiOmenz Dontcry
 
Enrico Fedrighini - Governare Green
Enrico Fedrighini - Governare GreenEnrico Fedrighini - Governare Green
Enrico Fedrighini - Governare GreenGianfranco Mascia
 
Carmine Maturo - Governare Green
Carmine Maturo - Governare GreenCarmine Maturo - Governare Green
Carmine Maturo - Governare GreenGianfranco Mascia
 
Flavia Marzano - Governare Green
Flavia Marzano - Governare GreenFlavia Marzano - Governare Green
Flavia Marzano - Governare GreenGianfranco Mascia
 
Arnaud Pinxteren - Governare Green
Arnaud Pinxteren - Governare GreenArnaud Pinxteren - Governare Green
Arnaud Pinxteren - Governare GreenGianfranco Mascia
 
Daniela Filbier - Governare Green
Daniela Filbier - Governare GreenDaniela Filbier - Governare Green
Daniela Filbier - Governare GreenGianfranco Mascia
 
Eivind Trædal - Governare Green
Eivind Trædal - Governare GreenEivind Trædal - Governare Green
Eivind Trædal - Governare GreenGianfranco Mascia
 

Viewers also liked (11)

Evelyne Huytebroeck - Governare Green
Evelyne Huytebroeck - Governare GreenEvelyne Huytebroeck - Governare Green
Evelyne Huytebroeck - Governare Green
 
Rivoluzione civile 2.0 2
Rivoluzione civile 2.0 2Rivoluzione civile 2.0 2
Rivoluzione civile 2.0 2
 
Rivoluzione civile 2.0
Rivoluzione civile 2.0Rivoluzione civile 2.0
Rivoluzione civile 2.0
 
Agr análise e gerenciamento riscos - 02748 - [ e 1 ]
Agr   análise e gerenciamento riscos - 02748 - [ e 1 ]Agr   análise e gerenciamento riscos - 02748 - [ e 1 ]
Agr análise e gerenciamento riscos - 02748 - [ e 1 ]
 
Presentasi sisitem-operasi
Presentasi sisitem-operasiPresentasi sisitem-operasi
Presentasi sisitem-operasi
 
Enrico Fedrighini - Governare Green
Enrico Fedrighini - Governare GreenEnrico Fedrighini - Governare Green
Enrico Fedrighini - Governare Green
 
Carmine Maturo - Governare Green
Carmine Maturo - Governare GreenCarmine Maturo - Governare Green
Carmine Maturo - Governare Green
 
Flavia Marzano - Governare Green
Flavia Marzano - Governare GreenFlavia Marzano - Governare Green
Flavia Marzano - Governare Green
 
Arnaud Pinxteren - Governare Green
Arnaud Pinxteren - Governare GreenArnaud Pinxteren - Governare Green
Arnaud Pinxteren - Governare Green
 
Daniela Filbier - Governare Green
Daniela Filbier - Governare GreenDaniela Filbier - Governare Green
Daniela Filbier - Governare Green
 
Eivind Trædal - Governare Green
Eivind Trædal - Governare GreenEivind Trædal - Governare Green
Eivind Trædal - Governare Green
 

Similar to Pbl

Problem based learning yang pertama
Problem based learning yang pertama Problem based learning yang pertama
Problem based learning yang pertama diah Cwek Tauruz
 
Problem based learning, A teaching strategy
Problem based learning, A teaching strategyProblem based learning, A teaching strategy
Problem based learning, A teaching strategySusmita Halder
 
Using technology with authentic learning in the project
Using technology with authentic learning in the projectUsing technology with authentic learning in the project
Using technology with authentic learning in the projectjennirae67
 
Faculty of Economics Trisakti University - Problem Based Learning (7 Jump Step)
Faculty of Economics Trisakti University - Problem Based Learning (7 Jump Step)Faculty of Economics Trisakti University - Problem Based Learning (7 Jump Step)
Faculty of Economics Trisakti University - Problem Based Learning (7 Jump Step)Dwitya Aribawa
 
Assignment
AssignmentAssignment
Assignmentrakhi94
 
Edct 551 week 1 chapters
Edct 551 week 1 chaptersEdct 551 week 1 chapters
Edct 551 week 1 chaptersnickyinger
 
Course Design in Higher Education with narration
Course Design in Higher Education with narrationCourse Design in Higher Education with narration
Course Design in Higher Education with narrationNeil Currant
 
PROJECT BASED LEARNING.pdf
PROJECT BASED LEARNING.pdfPROJECT BASED LEARNING.pdf
PROJECT BASED LEARNING.pdfGedRocamora
 
Project based learning
Project based learningProject based learning
Project based learningAtul Thakur
 
Features of Project-based learning; 1. Student-centered 2. Interdisciplinary ...
Features of Project-based learning; 1. Student-centered 2. Interdisciplinary ...Features of Project-based learning; 1. Student-centered 2. Interdisciplinary ...
Features of Project-based learning; 1. Student-centered 2. Interdisciplinary ...Future Education Magazine
 
Assessment tools for higher learning
Assessment tools for higher learningAssessment tools for higher learning
Assessment tools for higher learningsharifahshahab
 
Innovative methods of teaching
Innovative methods of teachingInnovative methods of teaching
Innovative methods of teachingGunjan Verma
 
Curriculum Design for Problem-Based Learning
Curriculum Design for Problem-Based Learning Curriculum Design for Problem-Based Learning
Curriculum Design for Problem-Based Learning Thanikachalam Vedhathiri
 
Project based learning group literature review
Project based learning group literature reviewProject based learning group literature review
Project based learning group literature reviewholdenh
 

Similar to Pbl (20)

Problem based learning yang pertama
Problem based learning yang pertama Problem based learning yang pertama
Problem based learning yang pertama
 
Ed 335 pbl
Ed 335 pblEd 335 pbl
Ed 335 pbl
 
Ed 335 pbl
Ed 335 pblEd 335 pbl
Ed 335 pbl
 
Problem based learning, A teaching strategy
Problem based learning, A teaching strategyProblem based learning, A teaching strategy
Problem based learning, A teaching strategy
 
Using technology with authentic learning in the project
Using technology with authentic learning in the projectUsing technology with authentic learning in the project
Using technology with authentic learning in the project
 
Problem Based Learning
Problem Based LearningProblem Based Learning
Problem Based Learning
 
Faculty of Economics Trisakti University - Problem Based Learning (7 Jump Step)
Faculty of Economics Trisakti University - Problem Based Learning (7 Jump Step)Faculty of Economics Trisakti University - Problem Based Learning (7 Jump Step)
Faculty of Economics Trisakti University - Problem Based Learning (7 Jump Step)
 
Assignment
AssignmentAssignment
Assignment
 
Problem based learning
Problem based learningProblem based learning
Problem based learning
 
Edct 551 week 1 chapters
Edct 551 week 1 chaptersEdct 551 week 1 chapters
Edct 551 week 1 chapters
 
Course Design in Higher Education with narration
Course Design in Higher Education with narrationCourse Design in Higher Education with narration
Course Design in Higher Education with narration
 
PROJECT BASED LEARNING.pdf
PROJECT BASED LEARNING.pdfPROJECT BASED LEARNING.pdf
PROJECT BASED LEARNING.pdf
 
Project based learning
Project based learningProject based learning
Project based learning
 
Problem based Learning.pdf
Problem based Learning.pdfProblem based Learning.pdf
Problem based Learning.pdf
 
Features of Project-based learning; 1. Student-centered 2. Interdisciplinary ...
Features of Project-based learning; 1. Student-centered 2. Interdisciplinary ...Features of Project-based learning; 1. Student-centered 2. Interdisciplinary ...
Features of Project-based learning; 1. Student-centered 2. Interdisciplinary ...
 
Assessment tools for higher learning
Assessment tools for higher learningAssessment tools for higher learning
Assessment tools for higher learning
 
Innovative methods of teaching
Innovative methods of teachingInnovative methods of teaching
Innovative methods of teaching
 
Curriculum Design for Problem-Based Learning
Curriculum Design for Problem-Based Learning Curriculum Design for Problem-Based Learning
Curriculum Design for Problem-Based Learning
 
Project based learning group literature review
Project based learning group literature reviewProject based learning group literature review
Project based learning group literature review
 
Pbl
PblPbl
Pbl
 

Pbl

  • 1. PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING IN TEACHER EDUCATION
  • 2. What is Problem-Based Learning? a pedagogical methodology by which learning is initiated with a posed problem Students assume a role in the problem scenario and are led through a process in which they: a) pose questions, “learning issues,” identifying what they need to know in order to address the problem b) rank the learning issues in terms of importance and decide who will investigate which issue c) identify needed resources and where they might be found d) gather needed information through individual and group investigation
  • 3. What is Problem-Based Learning? a pedagogical methodology by which learning is initiated with a posed problem Students assume a role in the problem scenario and are led through a process in which they: e) reconvene to integrate information f) generate and evaluate possible solutions g) make needed decisions or take agreed upon actions h) communicate results as appropriate for problem resolution i) step out of role to debrief on problem solving experience
  • 4. What is Problem-Based Learning? The “flow” of problem-based learning: Problem Engagement Inquiry and Investigation problem definition Problem Resolution Problem Stepien & Gallagher Debriefing
  • 5. What is Problem-Based Learning? As distinguished from Project-Based Learning: Product Project-Based emphasis Process Problem- emphasis Based
  • 6. What is Problem-Based Learning? Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is characterized by: meaningful activity – PBL engages students in problems that are designed to be realistic, intriguing, and relevant to the field of study. Meaningful problems thus serve as the context and the stimulus for knowledge-building and critical thinking. situated learning – PBL creates an environment that permits students to work on the kinds of problems that professionals encounter and to use the perspectives, the knowledge, and the skills that professionals use in attempting to solve them.
  • 7. What is Problem-Based Learning? Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is characterized by: open-ended generative tasks – PBL engages students in an ill-structured, open-ended problem for which there is no prescribed approach or solution. Students become intentional learners as they generate their own questions, plans, and goals. collaborative decision-making and problem-solving – PBL encourages students to work together in their problem solving and product development. Students collaborate with each other and with more knowledgeable individuals who model expert behaviors and lend assistance as students try out skills on their own.
  • 8. What is Problem-Based Learning? Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is characterized by: changed role of the instructor -- Instructors act as metacognitive coaches throughout the PBL process. They model and coach, giving students guidance as needed, but encouraging student independence in goal setting and decision-making.
  • 9. Why Use Problem-Based Learning? It represents the way learning occurs in the world outside the classroom. Some theorists, those who ascribe to situated cognition and activity theory in particular, claim that learning occurs only within the context of activity and is securely tied to the situation in which it occurs (e.g. Anderson, Reder, & Simon, 1996; Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Lave, 1988).
  • 10. Why Use Problem-Based Learning? It is engaging and, therefore, motivating. Writing about project-based learning, a term often used interchangeably with problem-based learning, Berliner (1992) notes: Intertwined with the cognitive components associated with projects are the motivational components inherent in projects. These include the fact that projects teach students to be mastery-oriented, not ability-oriented; they teach students to be learning-oriented rather than performance-oriented; and they teach students to be task-involved rather than ego-involved…When there is some degree of choice for the students, project-based methods motivate students more than any other teaching method I know about. (pp. 10-11)
  • 11. Why Use Problem-Based Learning? It increases the likelihood of transfer, a primary consideration in teacher education. The literature on transfer suggests that transferable learning experiences occur in an environment characterized by: • Meaningful activity • Expert guidance • Knowledge-building collaboration
  • 12. Why Use Problem-Based Learning? It promotes desirable student outcomes: • Intentional learning • Relational understanding • Critical thinking • Creative thinking • Effective collaboration • Versatile communication
  • 13. How Can Problem-Based Learning Be Assessed? by using multiple means to measure acquisition of knowledge, skills, and dispositions To Assess Product Method Knowledge Concept maps Expert map-based scheme Interrelationships among Unit products Rubrics facts, concepts Written/oral responses SOLO taxonomy (Relational Traditional tests Scoring guides understanding) Skills Unit products and/or Critical thinking performances Rubrics Creative thinking Written/oral responses SOLO taxonomy Effective collaboration Observation Rubrics Versatile communication Self-ratings Self-reports Peer ratings Likert scales Dispositions Problem logs Content analysis Intentional learning Observation Rubrics
  • 14. How Do We Use Problem-Based Learning in Teacher Education? to model PBL as an approach that we ask our students to use in their teaching MODEL > COACH > FADE Cognitive apprenticeship (Collins, Brown, & Newman, 1989) provides the theoretical basis of our approach to using PBL in methods classes. First, we model the use of PBL by using it. Next, we coach students as they develop their own PBL units to use with their students. Last, with each unit students develop we lend less direct assistance, i.e., we fade instruction.
  • 15. How Do We Feel About Using PBL in Teacher Education? It’s different! • Student driven • Problems prompt, rather than follow, skill development It’s hard! • Developing a “good” problem* • Consistent use of guided inquiry • Giving up control It’s time-consuming! • Planning It’s wonderful! • Implementing • High engagement • Self-directed learning * See note.
  • 16. References Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Berliner, D. C. (1992). Redesigning classroom activities for the future. Educational Technology, 32(5), 7-13. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem-soving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Human abilities: An information-processing approach (pp. 227-250). New York: W. H. Freeman & Co. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (CTGV). (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2-10. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp.453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 17. References Hattie, J., & Purdie, N. (1998). The SOLO model: Addressing fundamental measurement issues. In B. Dart & G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Teaching and learning in higher education. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press. Howard, J. (2002). Technology-enhanced project-based learning in teacher education: Addressing the goals of transfer. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 343-364. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press. Niedelman, M. (1991). Problem solving and transfer. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(6), 322-329. Rye, J. A., & Rubba, P. A. (2002). Scoring concept maps: An expert map-based scheme weighted for relationships. School Science & Mathematics, 102(1), 33-44. Skemp, R. R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 26(3), 9-15. Stepien, W.J., & Pyke, S.L. (1997). Designing problem-based learning units. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(4), 380-400.
  • 18. Related Reading Bereiter, C. (1997). Situated cognition and how to overcome it. In D. Kirshner & J.A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 281-300). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., & Palinscar A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 369-398. Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (1991). Activities as instructional tools: A framework for analysis and evaluation. Educational Researcher, 20(4), 9-23. Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). The power of problem-based learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing. Gallagher, S.A., Sher, B.T., Stepien, W.J., & Workman, D. (1995). Implementing problem-based learning in science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 95(3), 136-146. Hannafin, M.J., Hall, C., Land, S., & Hill, J. (1994). Learning in open-ended environments: Assumptions, methods, and implications. Educational Technology, 34(5), 48-55. Hung, D., & Wong, A. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for project work in learning environments. Educational Technology, 40(2), 33-37.
  • 19. Judith B. Howard, Ph.D. School of Education Elon University March 2003

Editor's Notes

  1. But first – What is a problem? And what is problem-solving? A problem is a situation in which one has a goal but must find a means for reaching it (Chi & Glaser, 1985). Problem-solving refers to the effort to achieve a goal for which there is no automatic solution. In the language of information–processing, a problem has three components: an initial state, a set of permissible operations, and a goal state. There are two classes of problems: well defined and ill defined . With well defined problems each component is clear, and you can readily recognize when the problem is solved. A problem is ill-defined if any one, or all, of the three components is not well specified: The initial state is vague. The problem situation is so complex that we really do not understand it very well. The operators are not well specified. The various actions that might be taken to modify the initial state are not clear, and many possible actions have not yet been formulated. The goal state is not clear. Often there is a lack of consensus even among experts about what the appropriate solution is. Problem-based learning (PBL) deals with the latter type, the ill-structured, real-world problems. The process of solving such problems is difficult and complex.
  2. What is problem-based learning? Definition
  3. What is problem-based learning? Definition (cont.)
  4. What is problem-based learning? Visual representation of the PBL process: The graphic shown here has been adapted from those found in Stepien, W.J., & Pyke, S.L. (1997). Designing problem-based learning units. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20 (4), 380-400; and in units designed as part of Project P-BLiSS, a project funded by the Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Program, Shelagh Gallagher, Project Director. The four phases include Engagement – Students become interested in problem situation and begin posing questions that lead to investigation. Investigation – Students explore problem to extend their knowledge & skills. Toward the end of this phase, they frame a problem statement. Resolution – Students make a decision with regard to a solution and decide how best to represent their solution. Debriefing – Students step outside problem to reflect and generalize both content and process.
  5. What is problem-based learning? Though many people use the terms project- based learning and problem -based learning interchangeably, a distinction can be made based on whether the focus is on the product or on the process. Typically, with project-based learning the focus is on the outcome, the product. In problem-based learning the focus is on inquiry and the problem-solving process itself rather than on fashioning a product. The difference lies in the goal of the learning experience. We consider problem-based learning a subset of project-based learning, a particular type of project-based learning with the distinguishing feature of initiating learning with a problem, one that is open-ended, ill-structured, intricate, and then focusing on the complex process of solving it.
  6. What is problem-based learning? Characterized by meaningful activity, situated learning
  7. What is problem-based learning? Characterized by open-ended generative tasks, collaborative decision-making and problem-solving
  8. What is problem-based learning? Characterized by changed role of instructor
  9. Why use problem-based learning? It represents authentic learning. Most “real life” problems – as opposed to “classroom” problems – are ill-structured, poorly defined. Solving them is a difficult and complex task. PBL gives students experience and a methodology for engaging in such problems.
  10. Why use problem-based learning? It is motivating. Berliner quote
  11. Why use problem-based learning? Transfer literature suggests that the salient qualities of transferable learning experiences occur in an environment that is characterized by meaningful activity, masterful guidance, and knowledge-building collaboration (Howard, 2002). Meaningful activity . If students perceive a situation as relevant to their lives, they are much more likely to put in the time and effort necessary to develop the rich knowledge base leading to deep understanding, a necessary ingredient for transfer. Expert guidance . Master teachers act as cognitive coaches, fostering the type of thinking that is essential for deep understanding and subsequent transfer. Without the guidance of a master teacher, students cannot be counted upon to make generalizations automatically, even in a rich, authentic context. Knowledge-building collaboration . As students and teachers work together, they learn from each other and knowledge builds as they synthesize information. This kind of endeavor involves metacognition, or the ability to monitor one’s own thinking, evaluate progress, and adjust next steps accordingly. These skills, too, can be decontextualized and applied to other situations.
  12. Why use problem-based learning? It promotes desirable student outcomes. Intentional learning (Bereiter & Scardamalia, 1989) refers to the purposeful construction of knowledge. Goal-setting is an important component as the learner establishes a personal agenda for acquiring knowledge and understanding information. Relational understanding (Skemp, 1978) may be defined as “knowing both what to do and why.” It stands in contrast to instrumental understanding , which is described as “rules without reason.” Also see Niedelman (1991).
  13. How can problem-based learning be assessed? For more about scoring concept maps, see Rye & Rubba (2002). For more about using the SOLO taxonomy for assessment, see Hattie & Purdie (1998).
  14. How do we use PBL in teacher education? Cognitive apprenticeship model
  15. How do we feel about using PBL in teacher education? It’s different, hard, time-consuming, and wonderful *Note: What is a “good” problem? One that: is embedded in significant content of the discipline(s) is complex and open-ended involves conceptual reasoning necessitates critical thinking encourages collaborative research provides one or more strong stakeholders
  16. References
  17. References (cont.)
  18. Related Reading
  19. End