Despite Marcellus and Utica production bulking up, many operators in the Golden Triangle have gone from high level of activity to extremely low level of activity,with everyone asking the question: What do we do with all this water? The industry has become highly efficient at recycling 100% of its produced water, butwith operators having consolidated their frac jobs, the burning questions now are : What are the most cost-effective advanced treatment technologies that can handle fluctuating production rates? What are the producer's selection criteria? What is the overall cost of treating water would be with each system? Can Marcellus' produced water be used on Utica wells? Is there formation compatibility? How can injection wells be constructed and operated while ensuring seismic events are mitigated? How can E&Ps coordinate frac jobs and put infrastructure in place to make water sharing a reality and deliver significant cost savings? Ultimately, how do we manage this produced water going forward in a low cost environment? The 6th Annual Low Cost Produced Water Management: Marcellus And Utica 2016, answers each of these questions and more with an industry approved agenda and supported speaker line-up, delivering tangible learning benefits to the minimize the cost per barrel and maintain operations in a low cost environment.

1. IdentifyingTheCheapestTreatment&DisposalOptionsToMinimize
Costs&MaintainOperationsInALowerActivityEnvironment
www.shale-water-marcellus-utica.com
Register By Friday
October 30, 2014
• Mobile Treatment
• Evaporation Technologies
• Crystallization Technologies
• Submerged Combustion
• Membrane Technologies
• Ion Exchange Technologies
Marcellus & Utica Fact File
Organized By:
SAVE UP TO 20% WITH GROUP DISCOUNTS
CALL FOR RATES: (1) 800 721 3915
Jeremy Manno
Infrastructure Construction Coordinator
Carrizo Oil & Gas
William Bates
Geologist
EPA
Andrew Dehoff
Executive Director
Susquehanna River Basin Commission
Peter Dorrins
President
Junex
Eddy Biehl
President & CEO
Stone Bridge Operating LLC
Laura Capper
Advisor
Hall Exploration
Katharine Fredriksen
Senior Vice President Environment
Strategy and Regulatory Affairs
CONSOL Energy
Practical Case Studies To Minimize Cost Per BarrelAnd Maintain
Cost Effective Operations In The Marcellus Utica
Innovative Water Management
Strategies For Produced Water Treatment,
Disposal Discharge
Whilst Complying With Seismicity And Disposal Regulatory Requirement
Industry Approved Agenda And Supported
Speaker Line-Up
6th Annual
The galloping growth rate of natural gas
production in Appalachia will slow in 2016,
but the Utica and Marcellus shales will
be the only plays in the U.S. with dry gas
production growth - Global Investment
Firm predicts.
Production growing from Utica Shale -
Natural gas production January-September
2015, skyrocketed 126%, to 651 billion cubic
feet (Bcf), from 287 Bcf during January-
September 2014.
March 30 - 31 2016 | Pittsburgh

2. www.shale-water-marcellus-utica.com (1) 800 721 3915 info@american-business-conferences.com
6th Annual
“Excellent congress that provided shared information
across companies and basins.
VP, Atlas Energy
Despite Marcellus and Utica production bulking up,
many operators in the Golden Triangle have gone from
high level of activity to extremely low level of activity,
with everyone asking the question:
What do we do with all this water?
The industry has become highly efficient at recycling 100% of its produced
water, but with not enough frac jobs, the burning questions now are:
• What are the most cost-effective advanced treatment technologies that
can handle fluctuating production rates?
• What are the producer’s selection criteria?
• What is overall cost of treating water would be with each system?
• Can Marcellus’ produced water be used on Utica wells?
• Is there formation compatibility?
• How can injection wells be constructed and operated while ensuring
seismic events are mitigated?
• How can EPs coordinate frac jobs and put infrastructure in place to
make water sharing a reality and deliver significant cost savings?
• Ultimately, how do we manage this produced water going forward in a low
cost environment?
The 6th Annual Low Cost Produced Water Management: Marcellus
And Utica 2016, answers each of these questions and more on March
30 and 31 in Pittsburgh, with an industry approved agenda and supported
speaker line-up, delivering tangible learning benefits to the minimize the cost
per barrel and maintain operations in a low cost environment.
Venue Information:
SAVE UP TO 20% WITH GROUP DISCOUNTS
CALL FOR RATES: (1) 800 721 3915
• INCREASED FOCUS ON WATER TREATMENT:
Investigating Advanced Methods And EP Selection
Criteria Of Treatment Technologies That Can Handle
Fluctuating Production Rates To Establish The Most
Cost-Effective Option For Specific Water Types
• FINDING NEW OUTLETS FOR MARCELLUS’
PRODUCED WATER: How To Beat Disposal Costs
By Using Marcellus Produced Water On Utica Wells
Whilst Mitigating Formation Damage
• DISPOSAL DISCHARGE STRATEGIES:
Evaluating All Possible Options For Long Term
Handling Of Produced Water Whilst Ensuring 24-
Hour Water Supply, Sustaining Production Levels
And Lowering LOE
• LATEST REGULATORY UPDATES: Hearing How
Regulatory Changes Will Affect And Limit The Use
Of Surface Water For Disposal And Clarifying The
OG-71 Permit
• MITIGATING INDUCED SEISMICITY: Practical
Steps For Characterizing The Geology Of Marcellus
And Utica Formations Prior To The Development Of
Salt Water Disposal Wells To Mitigate Seismic Events
• WATER SHARING: Providing A Platform For
Encouraging And Establishing Water Sharing
Agreements To Dramatically Reduce Costs In A
Cost-Driven, Low-Activity Environment
• PLANNING AHEAD: Examining What Operators
Can Do To Beat Long Term Disposal Costs
REASONS TO ATTEND

3. Comparing Case Studies And Case Water Treatment Technologies For Re-Use
Disposal, With An Integrated Focus On Water Sharing To Generate New Revenue Streams
In A Cost-Constrained Environment
Day 1
Wednesday March 30, 2016
8:30 Chair’s Opening Remarks
KEYNOTE 1: MARCELLUS WATER MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM
8:40 Hear How Marcellus Operators Are Reconfiguring
Their Treatment-For-Reuse And Treatment-For-Disposal
Strategy To Manage The Changing Pace Of The Industry
• Reuse in a low activity period: Understand how the company
accounted for water chemistries and formation topography to
create its water reuse plan
• Water Treatment Selection: Hearing which parameters were
used and what kind of testing was applied to compare and
evaluate most cost effective option for different Marcellus
water types Disposal options: Understanding how operators
are working within regulatory confines to ensure excess water
is discharged to surface water
• Infrastructure Design: Examining how the layout of the facility
was designed to optimize proximity and transport costs
• Working with other operators: Considering factors that the
company is accounting for before entering into water sharing
agreement
• Marcellus Utica: Weighing up advantages and ramifications
of moving Marcellus water to Utica wells to make sure
disposal costs are kept low
KatharineFredriksen,SeniorVicePresidentEnvironmentStrategyAnd
RegulatoryAffairs,CONSOLEnergy
DerekSmith,SeniorDirectorHSE,RexEnergy
9:10 Question Answer Session
KEYNOTE 2: UTICA WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
9:20 Hear How A Utica Operator Is Reconfiguring Its
Water Management Strategy In The Context Of The Low
Price Environment
• Understand how the company accounted for water types and
proximity to injection wells to create its water reuse plan
• Disposal options: Understanding how operators are working
within regulatory confines to ensure excess water is
discharged into injection wells, while mitigating seismic events
• Working with other operators: Considering factors that the
company is accounting for before entering into water sharing
agreement to enable those in the preliminary stages to
assess whether it is viable for them
EddyBiehl,PresidentCEO,StoneBridgeOperating
9:50 Question Answer Session
MARKET PLACE ROADMAP FOR WATER SHARING
PROVIDING A PLATFORM TO ENCOURAGE AND
ESTABLISH WATER SHARING AGREEMENTS AND SHARING
RESOURCES TO DRAMATICALLY REDUCE COSTS IN A
COST-DRIVEN, LOW-ACTIVITY ENVIRONMENT
WATER SHARING: MULTI-STAKEHOLDER PANEL
10:00 Assessing Potential Opportunities, Hurdles,
Legal Challenges And Presenting Solutions To Expedite
Agreements Between Operators And Utilize The Market
Place For Water Sharing
Moderatedby:JoshAdler,CEO,SourceWater
• Discussing steps for putting infrastructure in place to share
water during gaps between fracturing one well and beginning
the next one
• Discussing if an operator is willing to delay their schedule for
another operator. Can this be done?
• Vendor choice: Hearing implications of using the same or
different vendors to transport water and how it will affect
water-sharing agreements
• Debating methods of monitoring the stream flow and what
their pass-by numbers areConsidering steps to circumvent
potential internal holdups, including protection of interests to
further greater industry involvement
• Legal Requirements: Discussing where transfer of custody
takes place to clarify ownership rightsHearing about new,
innovative third party efforts to create clearinghouses and
whether the industry can come together to create similar
water sharing body
Panelist:PeterDorrins,President,Junex
Panelist:WilliamThorwart,SeniorForemanWaterManagement,
SenecaResources
10:30 Networking Refreshments Break Dedicated To Water Sharing
Designated Inter And Intra Jurisdiction Discussion Areas For
Making Water Sharing A Reality Across Eastern Pennsylvania,
West Virginia, Ohio
The morning break has been specifically designed to allow
EPs the opportunity to break into small, dedicated groups
and assess the concept of sharing water within and across
state jurisdictions and discuss the value of water sharing by
evaluating region and company specific limitations, production
rates and predicted growth
Intended Outcome At The End Of The Break : Practical
Steps For Streamlining Efforts To Make Water Sharing A
Reality In 2016
MAKING A CASE FOR WATER SHARING
11:00 Water Sharing: Assessing How EPs Can Coordinate
Frac Jobs And Put Infrastructure In Place To Make Water
Sharing A Reality And Deliver Cost Savings
• How can operators coordinate frac jobs and delay schedules for
one another to streamline operations and reduce costs Hearing
practical steps for sharing water transportation infrastructure
to reduce water management costs
• Hearing about innovative third party efforts to create clearing
houses
• Evaluating how much progression has been made between the
Marcellus and Utica and how close are we to being able to do
this as an industry
• Answering the question: Will water sharing be a reality in 2016?
JoshAdler,CEO,SourceWater
11:30 Question Answer Session
WATER TREATMENT CASE STUDIES: COMPARING
CAPABILITIES FROM AN EXPENSE STANDPOINT
INVESTIGATING ADVANCED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
TO ESTABLISH THE MOST COST-EFFECTIVE OPTIONS FOR
SPECIFIC WATER TYPES, WHILST HANDLING FLUCTUATING
PRODUCTION RATES
MOBILE TREATMENT VS. CENTRALIZED PERMANENT
STRUCTURE
11:40 Evaluating The Extent To Which Mobile Treatment Is The
Most Cost-Effective Way Of Treatment Vs. Centralized Facilities
For Different Water Chemistries And Production Rates
• Learning exactly which option can handle shifting produced
water rates at the lowest possible cost
• Assessing benefits and limitations of centralized treatment
and mobile treatment based on the types of water coming in to
determine versatility of each method
• Reviewing permitting timeline from ‘application to approval’ of
treatment centralized treatment facilities to ensure plans run
to schedule
• Discussing ways to characterize water constituents before
transporting to a treatment facility to minimize trucking time
MarkPatton,VPSalesMarketing,Hydrozonix
12:00 Question Answer Session
EVAPORATION FOR RE-USE
12:10 Quantifying Results From Piloted Trials To
Demonstrate Opportunities For Treating High TDS Water
In A Cost Driven Environment
• Understanding the cost per barrel of using evaporation for
treating high TDS water versus water quality achieved to
determine whether it is worth the investment
• Breaking down how evaporation works and how advances
in this method can reduce water management costs while
complying with state regulations
• Evaluating by-products resulting from evaporation treatment to
allow EPs to plan for:Cost of Transportation
• Destination for by-productsNumber of trucks needed to move
by-products to destinations
12:40 Question Answer Session
12.50 Networking Lunch Technology Showcase In Exhibition Area
TECHNOLOGY SHOWCASE LIVE DEMONSTRATIONS
Incentivizing New Ranges Of Water Treatment Technologies:
Track Record Of Each In The Field To Define Cost-Effective
Options For Operators
• Mobile Treatment
• Evaporation Technologies
• Crystallization Technologies
• Submerged Combustion
• Membrane Technologies
• Ion Exchange Technologies
CRYSTALLIZATION: OPERATOR LED CASE STUDY
1:50 Understanding An EP’s Rationale For Using
Crystallization As The Treatment Technology Of Choice
Versus Evaporation: A Value-Based Assessment
• Making decisions : What kind of testing was done, what were the
results and what parameters were used to qualify the decision
• Learning which types of water can be most efficiently
treated using crystallization to ensure resources are
directed effectively
• Assessing potential ramifications of using crystallization vs.
evaporation methods to avoid setbacks during production
2:20 Question Answer Session
TREATMENT FOR ALTERNATIVE REUSE
2:30 Demonstrating Real Time Examples Of Robust,
Higher Level Treatment For Produced Water When
Fracturing Other Wells Is Not An Option
• Assessing which other industries can use produced water
and at what quality to determine treatment requirements
and costs
• Water constituents: Distinguishing the chemistry of
produced water, specifically organic content, to determine
appropriate treatment technique
• Hearing how EPs are working with service providers to
advance the science on treating water to a higher quality
standard in the context of the changing industry climate
LauraCapper,Advisor,HallExploration
3:00 Question Answer Session
TENORM
3:10 Developing Best Practices For Handling And Legally
Discharging Technologically Enhanced Radioactive
Material And The Long-Term Effect It Will Have On The
Industry
• Hearing strategies to encapsulate NORMS, including mixing
with cements and chemicals to identify most cost effective
and safe method
• Scrutinizing the capabilities of Ion Exchange and Membrane
Technologies to remove radioactive material and
determining where it can be discharged
• Assessing if radioactive material and NORMS need to be
removed for recycle and reuse
DavidAllard,Director,BureauofRadiationProtection,DEP
3:40 Question Answer Session
3:50 Afternoon Refreshments In Exhibition Showcase Area
FINDING NEW OUTLETS FOR MARCELLUS’ PRODUCED WATER
EXAMINING HOW TO BEAT DISPOSAL COSTS BY USING
MARCELLUS PRODUCED WATER ON UTICA WELLS
REUSING MARCELLUS WATER IN UTICA WELLS
4:20 Hearing How To Reduce Water Management Costs
By Reusing Marcellus Water on Utica Wells
Clarifying possible ambiguities around produced water
transfer from Marcellus wells and reuse on Utica wells into
Utica wells to open up opportunities and new outlets for
produced water
• Is the water chemistry desirable? Is there formation
compatibility? Sharing practical experiences to demonstrate
viability of this new outlet
• Can water streams be mixed? Quantifying impacts on the
well and trial results
• Mitigating potential risks: Discovering potential pitfalls that can
occur when transferring water used from one well to another
YaelTucker,ResearchScientist,U.S.DepartmentofEnergy-
NationalEnergyTechnologyLaboratory
4:50 Question Answer Session
INCREASED FOCUS ON UTICA
MITIGATING OPERATIONAL EFFECTS PRODUCTION
LOSSES IN UTICA WELLS
MITIGATING SALTING AND SCALING
5:00 Mapping The Degree Of Salting And Scaling Issues
In Utica Wells To Avoid Potential Production Losses And
Add Commercial Advantage
• Evaluating if EPs are seeing losses in production from
salting and scaling issues to quantify if reusing water on
Utica fracs can give a commercial advantage
• Reviewing whether operators that are producing water in
low volumes are seeing any reaction with the formation and
if it is different to the Eastern Marcellus
• Establishing the effect produced water is having on the
formation, if any at all
DavidYoxheimer,Hydrogeologist,MarcellusCentreForOutreach
Research
5:30 Question Answer Session
5:40 Chair’s Closing Remarks
5:50 - 6:50 Networking Drinks Reception In Exhibition
Showcase Area
www.shale-water-marcellus-utica.com (1) 800 721 3915 info@american-business-conferences.com

4. 8:30 Chair’s Opening Remarks
KEYNOTE PANEL: LONG TERM DISPOSAL DISCHARGE
STRATEGY
8:40 Evaluating All Possible Options For Long Term
Handling Of Produced Water Whilst Ensuring 24-Hour
Water Supply, Sustaining Production Levels And
Lowering LOE
• Making the decision : Understanding how the operator
weighed up the cost vs. benefit of using internal, external
or contracted facilities to get rid of water of water at the
cheapest price possible
• Benchmarking the criteria being used to look for a long-
term solution for managing wastewater while meeting
regulatory requirements for discharge
• Seeing measures the company has taken to minimize
the risk and adverse effects of produced water on its
development plan, including salting, scaling, leaks and spills
• Controlling the logistical aspect of produced water handling:
Establishing what has worked and what hasn’t to make sure
operations expenses and LOE remain low
Panelist:RobWingo,ChiefOperatingOfficer,RiceEnergy
9:10 Question Answer Session
SALTWATER DISPOSAL INDUCED SEISMICITY
OVERVIEWING RESULTS ON WATER DISPOSAL AND
INDUCED SEISMICITY TO ENSURE ADHERENCE, AND
AVOID SEISMIC CAUSATION
MITIGATING INDUCED SEISMICITY
9:20 Outlining Steps For Characterizing The Geology
Of Marcellus And Utica Formations Prior To The
Development Of Salt Water Disposal Wells To Mitigate
Induced Seismicity
• Understanding how geologists are monitoring the reservoir
geology to assess the seismicity of a specific area to avoid
potential earthquakes
• Detailing precautionary measures that were taken when
building an injection well to ensure that seismic events do
not take place
• Considering any pre-permitting elements that were
evaluated before building a permanent injection well to
ensure compliance with state regulations
WilliamBates,Geologist,EPA
9:50 Question Answer Session
DISPOSAL IN INJECTION WELLS
10:00 Providing A Case Study On How Injection Wells
Are Being Cost-Effectively Constructed, Implemented
And Operated Within State Regulations And Ensuring
Seismic Events Are Mitigated
• Understanding what happens with the water after it is
injected down wells to determine processing lifespanIn
• jection vs. Treatment: Comparing the pros and cons of
incurring the expense of operating an injection well or using
a third party site versus treatment water to a high standard
• Clarifying ambiguities around recoverable by-products from
injection wells
• Recognizing the long-term and short-term risk associated
with injection to uncover any potential ramifications
• Learning whether there are any government regulations
that are going to drive companies, to treat produced water
instead of selling it to injection wells
10:30 Question Answer Session
10.40 Morning Refreshments In Exhibition Showcase Area
PLANNING AHEAD: LONG TERM DISPOSAL FACILITIES
EXAMINING WHAT OPERATORS CAN DO TO BEAT LONG
TERM DISPOSAL COSTS, CHALLENGES AND BECOME
SELF-RELIANT
EP OWNED DISPOSAL FACILITIES: PANEL DISCUSSION
11:20 Evaluating An Action Plan For Encouraging
The Industry To Collaborate And Develop Their Own
Treatment And Disposal Facility On An AD Stream
• Comparing the long-term cumulative costs of taking the
water to a disposal facility versus building an in-house
disposal facility to justify the extra expense
• Mapping location of third party storage capacities being
used nearest to EP facilities and the capabilities they can
handle
• Hearing progress updates from operators developing
additional pipelines from facilities to disposal wells, thus
eliminating the need for produced water trucking
• Hearing any proposed plans for new EP owned disposal
facilities and who they will serve
JeremyManno,InfrastructureDesignCoordinator,CarizzoOilGas
11:30 Question Answer Session
REGULATORY UPDATES
HEARING HOW REGULATORY CHANGES WILL AFFECT
AND LIMIT THE USE OF SURFACE WATER FOR DISPOSAL,
WATER SOURCING AND CLARIFYING THE OG-71 PERMIT
STATE REGULATIONS
11:40 Hearing Updates From Regulatory Bodies For
Marcellus And Utica On Regulations Will Affect The Use
Of Surface Water For Disposal And Water Sourcing
• Providing clarity on how the regulations will be developed to
control use of surface water use for disposal and how much
input operators have had
• Is there a forum for feedback? Hearing whether operators
are able to influence the regulators in order to have the best
alignment between stakeholders
• Controlling the use of surface water: Understanding
whether operators at dissimilar part of the value chain and
in different regions will be affected differently
• Underlining whether government regulations are going to
drive/force companies to treat produced water more instead
of selling it to injection wells or treating it for the next frac
• Examining commercial challenges operators have faced
due to changing regulations in the past 3 years to provide a
general understanding of how they have impacted industry
economics
• Future plans: Providing clarity on where regulatory are going
to allow EPs to adjust plans internally
SRBCUpdate:AndrewDehoff,ExecutiveDirector,SRBCDEPUpdate
:TBC
12:10 Question Answer Session
12.20 Networking Lunch Technology Showcase In
Exhibition Area
TECHNOLOGY SHOWCASE LIVE DEMOSTRATIONS
Incentivizing New Ranges Of Water Treatment Discharge
Technologies: Establishing Efficiency Track Record Of Each
In The Field To Define Cost-Effective Options For Operators
OG-71 REGULATORY UPDATE: PLANNING FOR 2017
1:20 Interpreting The OG-71 Permit For Water
Treatment And Reuse To Develop Long-Term Water
Handling Strategies And Prepare For Integration In 2017
• Providing clarity on how the PA DEP is interpreting the OG-
71 permit for water treatment and re-use
• Timing: Establishing how much time it takes to get new
permits and the amount of permits required to ensure plans
run to schedule
• Reviewing proposed alternatives: Highlighting how
operators can plan to handle waste water storage and re-
use after closure of all the in-ground impoundments
• Achieving consensus: Understanding how open the DEP is
to suggestions and alterations from operators to language
and/or interpretation for new guidance on permits
1:50 Question Answer Session
2:40 Afternoon Refreshments In Exhibition Showcase Area
STORAGE OPTIONS, WATER TRANSFER SPILL
PREVENTION
MINIMIZING THE RISK OF STORING AND MOVING
PRODUCED WATER
3:00 Evaluating Best Practices And Quality Control
Procedures To Ensure EPs Are Pressure Testing
Transfer Lines And Guaranteeing There Is No Chance
Of Corruption And Spills
• Testing Frequency: Identifying recommended pressure test
durations for transfer pipes to avoid ruptures from occurring
• Highlighting high and low temperature ranges that signpost
concern and necessary steps to be taken in each case
• Double wall vs. single wall pipes: Comparing pros and cons
to establish the most cost-effective and reliable method
• Discussing whether there is any machinery that can judge
the integrity of the bond
• Valving sections/distances: Understanding what is a safe
distance according to state regulations to avoid ruptures
• Where does the transfer of custody take place? Defining a
clear line of transfer custody
EddyBiehl,PresidentCEO,StoneBridgeOperating
2:30 Question Answer Session
TEMPORARY AND LONG TERM STORAGE
2:00 Comparing Capabilities Of Temporary And
Permanent Water Storage Options From Initial Billing
To Final Execution To Highlight Optimum Method For
Reducing Disposal Cost And Downtime Onsite
• Understanding the cost to set up and operate each storage
type to understand the long-term economics and viability of
each type
• Discussing liabilities and risks from long term usage,
including open and closed top risk, for each type of storage
to ensure necessary precautionary steps are taken
• Hearing how frequently operators are re-evaluating their
engineering specs to safeguard their facilities from regular
inspections and penalties
• Reviewing proposed regulatory changes for water storage in
Pennsylvania in 2016 and how they will impact operators
WATER TRANSFER - AVOIDING RUPTURES: PANEL
DISCUSSION
3:50 Question Answer Session
4:00 Chair’s Closing Remarks
4:10 End of Conference
Day 2
Thursday March 31, 2016
Evaluating Long Term Produced Water Disposal And Discharge, Regulatory Updates
And Compliance Strategies
www.shale-water-marcellus-utica.com (1) 800 721 3915 info@american-business-conferences.com

5. Address For Invoice Purposes
Zip/Postal Code
Country
Payment must be received in full prior to the event.
* Option 1. CREDIT CARD Please charge my *VISA *AMERICAN EXPRESS *MASTERCARD
Expiry date
Security Code / CVV (required)
Signature of card holder
Amount $
Card number
Name on card
I would like to register the delegate(s) below for the 2 day summit
6TH ANNUAL LOW COST PRODUCED WATER MANAGEMENT MARCELLUS UTICA 2016
PYes
Details PLEASE USE CAPITALS - PHOTOCOPY FOR MULTIPLE DELEGATES
Delegate Rates GUESTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN TRAVEL AND ACCOMMODATION ARRANGEMENTS
Payment PLEASE TICK APPROPRIATE BOXES AND COMPLETE DETAILS
How To Finalize Your Registration
* Option 2. INVOICE An invoice containing payment instructions will be sent electronically upon receipt of the completed registration form.
Delegate 1
*Mr *Dr *Miss *Ms *Mrs *Other:
Name
Position
Organization
Email
Telephone
Delegate 2
*Mr *Dr *Miss *Ms *Mrs *Other:
Name
Position
Organization
Email
Telephone
All prices quoted above are inclusive of GST
Now that your details are completed please send your registration form to our
Customer Service Team using one of the following options:
Option 1. Email: info@american-business-conferences.com
Option 2. Fax: (1) 800 714 1359
Enquiries And More Information
Should you have any enquiries or if you would like to request more information
please contact our friendly Customer Service Team on
(1) 800 721 3915 or visit the conference website at
www.shale-water-marcellus-utica.com
Super Early Discount Early Discount Standard Rate
Register and Pay by January 22, 2016 Register and Pay by February 19, 2016 From February 20, 2016
2 Day Conference Suppliers
Service Providers *$1399 SAVE $400 *$1599 SAVE $200 *$1799
2 Day Conference EP Operators *$1199 SAVE $400 *$1399 SAVE $200 *$1599
Add Video Package * $750
Live Streaming * $999
SAVE UP TO 20%
WITH GROUP DISCOUNTS
Call for rates: (1) 800 721 3915
Terms Conditions
The conference is being organized by American Business
Conferences, a division of London Business Conferences Ltd,
a limited liability company formed under English company
law and registered in the UK no. 5090859. Cancellations
received 30 days prior to the start of the event will be eligible
for a refund less $150 administration fee, after this point no
refund will be given. Cancellations must be made in writing,
if you are unable to attend you may nominate a colleague
to attend in your place at no additional cost. Receipt of this
registration form, inclusive or exclusive
of payment constitutes formal agreement to attend
and acceptance of the terms and conditions stated. All
outstanding fees must be paid within our standard payment
period of 7 days. Any outstanding invoices will remain valid
should cancellation of attendance be received outside of the
aforementioned cancellation period.
If you are claiming the early booking discount this may not
be used in conjunction with other discounts advertised
the time of registration. American Business Conferences
reserves the right to alter or cancel the speakers or program.
American Business Conferences reserve the right to refuse
admission. We would like to keep you informed of other
American Business Conferences products and services. This
will be carried out in accordance with the Data Protection Act.
Please write to the Head of Marketing, American Business
Conferences if you specifically do not want to receive this
information. American Business Conferences. City Center
One. 800 Town Country Blvd. Suite 300. Houston. Texas.
77024. American Business Conferences will not accept
liability for any individual transport delays and in such
circumstances the normal cancellation restrictions apply.
American Business Conferences is a Division of London
Business Conferences Limited, Registered in England No.
5090859 EIN. no: 98-0514924
www.shale-water-marcellus-utica.com (1) 800 721 3915 info@american-business-conferences.com