Process Evaluation

Process Evaluation
Process evaluation aims at evaluating the effectiveness of a process or a system, which is in this case a shelter for homeless young women. The results
of a process evaluation is used to derive policies for continuous process improvement. In this assignment, I assume that the evaluation is more
customer–oriented, and the result of the evaluation is going to be used towards providing better quality of services for the homeless women living in
the shelter.
The stakeholders are people who are affected by the quality of services or play a role in services. In this case, direct stakeholders include the homeless
women living in the shelter, the primary investigators and funders, the staff in charge of management and running the facility. The indirect ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
What stakeholders think about the needs and whether they think the needs are met through the offered services. What their opinions are regarding the
adequacy of the services and the ways the services can be altered or improved. It is important that evaluators gain insights from various direct and
indirect stakeholders' opinions, point of views, and interpretations by conducting in–depth interviews, observational studies, or other methods such as
focus groups. Since the results of this evaluation is going to be used to improve the services, it is critical that the management team and funders clearly
understand the customers' (i.e. homeless women) point of views and needs. Therefore, it may be beneficial to include the management team in the
evaluation process from the study design and data collection phases to data analysis phase. Moreover, it is important that the homeless women have a
deep understanding of the management's perspective and the limitation and constraints that they face, thus, they can sometimes collaborate and even
contribute to improve the services. Therefore, not only should the homeless women be part of the data collection phase, but also the results of the
evaluation should be shared and analyzed with their
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Evaluation Of A Educational Evaluation Model
While reading through chapter 2 in our text, I tried to visualize each of the evaluation approaches as they relate to my daily work. The one that
allowed me to visualize the most and that related to me more than the others is the CIPP Model for Program Evaluation, which is a decision–based
approach. Originally developed as an educational evaluation model, the CIPP follows a four–part process that is largely led by questions that program
directors have. Context. Input. Process. Product. These are the four parts of the CIPP framework. Each of these seeks to answer questions and guide
the evaluation process. I related to this approach the most because I see this framework in some shape or form in many aspects of my daily work.
The following provides one example of how this directly relates to my current position. Initial Program Focus: Rollout of educational technology
resources and equipment including but not limited to IWB's, iPads, and Macbooks after receiving grant funding. Context: In looking at this area, the
problem was that the sheer number of tools granted to our program for use outnumbered the resources we had to implement them on such a scale. The
need for a professional development plan program rollout was of primary importance. In this context phase, asking other staff questions around what
they think are the primary needs to address as well as identifying their most important needs is essential (which also gives this a participatory feel).

Evaluation Of A Program Evaluation
Consider how you would evaluate your program relative to each of the components. Linnan and Steckler (2002) describe the following key process
evaluation components: Context–aspects of the larger social environment that may affect implementation; Reach–the proportion of the intended
audience to whom the program is actually delivered; Dose–delivered–The amount of intended units of each program component that is delivered;
Dose–received–the extent to which participants engage with the program; Fidelity–the extent to which the intervention was delivered as intended (
Bartholomew et al., 2011. p.526). Program evaluation is an important tool to show that the health interventions have been effective and they also
intend to improve the health of the target population. Evaluation helps define the worth of a program. It is imperative to conduct program evaluation
in order to provide feedback to improve the effectiveness of the program. Evaluation plans should be developed at the beginning of the health
program interventions. The CDC framework for program evaluation is comprised of the following steps:1) Engage stakeholders; 2) Describe the
program; 3) Focus on evaluation design; 4) Gather credible evidence; 5) Justify conclusions; 6) Ensure use and share lessons learned. Also listed are
the four standards for assessing the quality of evaluation activities: utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy (CDC, 2013). According to an article in
the CDC (2013), "As noted in the

Consider how you would evaluate your Program relative to each of the components Linnan and Steckler (2002) describe the following key process
evaluation components: Context–aspects of the larger social environment that may affect implementation; Reach–the proportion of the intended
audience to whom the program is actually delivered; Dose–delivered–The amount of intended units of each program component that is delivered;
Dose–received–the extent to which participants engage with the program; Fidelity–the extent to which the intervention was delivered as intended (
Bartholomew et al., 2011. p.525). Program evaluation is an important tool to show that the health interventions have been effective and they also intend
to improve the health... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As such, it's important that the evaluation approach be useful, feasible, ethical, and accurate" (CDC, 2013). All the above components of the
framework should be applied to the adolescent tobacco program evaluation. What are your indicators for each component? The proportion of the
intended target audience (adolescents) that participates in an intervention (tobacco cessation) is often measured by attendance. Reach is a feature of
the target audience. Dose delivered is a function of efforts of the intervention providers. The extent to which participants actively engage with, interact
with, are receptive to, and/or use materials or recommended resources (e.g., Web sites, videos, brochures, newspaper advertisements, posters, telephone
quit line, behavioral therapy etc.) (Linnan & Steckler, 2002). Dose received is an attribute of the target audience and it measures the extent of
commitment of participants with the intervention (Linnan & Steckler, 2002). "Fidelity is a function of the intervention providers. A composite score
that indicates the extent to which the intervention has been implemented and received by the intended audience" (Linnan & Steckler, 2002). According
to an article by Wierenga et al. (2013), "Of these eight components, six components focus on implementation (reach, recruitment,

Process Evaluation
A process evaluation is a tool utilized to identify the key components of intervention that are effective and under what conditions. Additionally it also
evaluates the extent to which a program is being implemented as planned. A process evaluation can be broken down into six steps which are depicted
in the diagram below. In order to engage stake holders the process must begin at the evaluation cycle. Stakeholders in regards to our program include
those who are directly involved with program operations. This includes the staff utilized to procure supplies and equipment, those involved in the
delivery of supplies equipment, those who distribute educational materials, those that perform diabetic testing and those that interact with the target...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Credible evidence is very important in order to ensure stakeholder engagement and to strengthen the evaluation finding and recommendations. Credible
evidence regarding our program will be gathered from key indicators. A key indicator is a specific, observable, and measurable component that
supports the goal or premise of the program. Our key indicators include survey data, service utilization, observations of staff, interviewing the target
population and solicitation of feedback. Specific milestones regarding these indicators are delineated in the program goals and

Evaluation Of A Formative Evaluation Plan
{ Christina May Weems } February 26, 2015 WBID Evaluation Plan Christina Weems DeVry University EDUC 543 February 26, 2015 Table of
Contents Part A: Formative Evaluation Plan3 General Evaluation Information3 Evaluation Criteria4 Evaluation Matrix5 Effectiveness5 Appeal6
Efficiency6 Stakeholders7 Evaluation Materials8 Part B: Preliminary Summative Evaluation Plan8 General Evaluation Information8 Materials Being
Evaluated9 Design Plans9 Prototype & Website9 Summative Evaluation Plan9 Data Collection & Analysis Timeline/ Gantt Chart10 Sample Student
End Course Survey11 References13 Part A: Formative Evaluation Plan General Evaluation Information During web based instructional design (WBID)
and development, formative evaluation will occur from school experts including the schools technology manager, assistant principal of curriculum, and
the business department chair. They will review the materials presented in the WBI (web based instruction) elements for design, content, graphics,
structure, message, and technical specifications. Formative of the final WBI prototype will take place as a small group of students (one section) field
test the WBI over a term. Test and assignment scores, student participation, surveys, and discussions with students will assist with determining the
relative successes and failures of the program as well as areas that need improvement. The overall goal is to determine if student learning is enhanced
through

Methods Of Program Evaluation. Evaluation Research Is Offered
Methods of Program Evaluation Evaluation research is offered referred to as program evaluation, which indicates a research purpose, not a specific
research method (Maxfield, 2015, p. 280). The evaluation research purpose is to evaluate the effects of policies, for instance, new sentencing laws.
There are many types of evaluation research, such as problem analysis, evidence–based policy, and evidence generation. The purpose of this paper is to
show the important of evaluation research through an evaluation research publication.
Publication Bias in Medical Informatics Evaluation Research
The article is called "Publication Bias in Medical Informatics Evaluation Research: Is it an issue or not?," written by Christof Machan, Elske
Ammenwerth, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This will find if there is a big influence of publication bias and to give comparable statistics to this question a random sample of eighty–six references
were taking from a database. The database was based on explanative and evaluation approach, which was more quantitative. While the second question
was about the statistical assessment of publication bias that asked to what extent is a statistical assessment of publication bias for evaluation studies in
health informatics possible (Machan, 2006). This question allows for a scatter plot classifying every single study by effect size and study quality. In
order to achieve the researchers had to find a certain number of studies evaluating the systems, measuring the same effect and providing quantitative
data for effect size and study quality. The evaluation research done for this question was physician order entry system, drug prescription system, and
more quantitative.Whereas the third question was quality of reviews and meta–analyses that asked are there more systematic and narrative reviews or
more meta–analyses referenced in the database and do most of them draw positive, neutral or negative conclusion (Machan, 2006). Also, asked if there
is an issue of publication bias being dealt with by the

Peformance Evaluation
Introduction The contents of this paper will reveal the performance evaluation process and how can it become successful during the employee
evaluation process. As well as is the process difficult from the manager or the employee perspective's by also the revealing various traits of an
effective manager in the workplace.
After reading some material in our text regarding this subject as well as other research from various outsides sources, I did come across why mangers
do not like giving a performance evaluation. Let's first discuss why some managers find the performance evaluation process difficult and why some
detests this particular process when the time comes for it. In my opinion the performance management system are supposed ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I also would like to point out that some managers tend to forget that at one time they use to be on the receiving end of receiving a performance
evaluation and needs to remember how it that felt to now do the same time to someone else at the beginning of their career.
There are managers that do struggle with the evaluation process; in further research Watkins suggests "One of the paradoxes of leadership
development is that people earn promotions to senior functional levels predominantly by being good at blocking and tackling, but employees with
strategic talent may struggle at lower levels because they focus less on the details" (Watkins, 2012). In my opinion some just do not want to be
labeled the dream killer since the majority or a performance evaluation is to see if that employee is ready for the next step and if he or she is capable to
take on more responsibility.
In my opinion some elements to a having successful employee process is by having and giving a clear understanding to its employees while giving
them the chance to provide feedback in planning the evaluation and reorganization the process in order to warrant that the standards for
accomplishment are both unbiased and realistic. Including employees in the review process produces an understanding of its true purpose and inspires
willing input. According to our text it suggests the idea that "Training to eliminate certain types of errors often introduces other types of errors

Evaluation Of A Student Evaluation
Students were given a candidate evaluation form to evaluate me as their teacher. The students received this form on October 15th 2015, and the form
was due back by the end of the class period. I instructed the students not to put their name on their evaluation, as this is an anonymous evaluation. My
intentions for stating this, is for the students to know that I would not use the information they wrote against them in any way. Once they finished
they were to pass them up to the front tables. The chart following displays 19 students' evaluations. The students' responses were mostly positive,
which was great to see while evaluating the evaluations. One of my strengths were "expecting all students to learn", which didn't surprise me because
I make sure every student knows I believe in them and expects them all to give their very best in my class. For all of my students to see this, it's a
given that another strength would be "treats all students fairly". My goal is to make sure every student is given the same opportunity and know my
main goal is that they learn the information in a safe environment. I am a firm believer that as an educator you must know your content, but you must
be able to deliver the information to the students. My students feel that I know the content, but I also want them to see that I am able to deliver the
information to them to meet all of their needs. "Teaching the subject matter so I understand it" and "Uses different ways to teach the lessons that

A Program Evaluation is an important factor in determining if an agency is producing successful results. Usually a program evaluation is requested or
brought forth by a specific concern that is in need of being addressed. This type of practice–based research method provides agencies with
accountability. Sometimes a program evaluation is needed in order for some agencies to continue to receive funding to keep their programs, to meet
accreditation standards, and to ensure clients are being helped by the programs (Royse, 2011). Before performing a program evaluation, it is
important to consider many factors such as time, resources, audience, and purpose. A time limit for an agency evaluation could change the direction
the evaluation goes. Resources are definitely an important aspect of the evaluation. A lack of resources could result in a simpler process whether
than a copyrighted tool for an evaluation. The type of audience and purpose will in turn decide which type of method is to be implemented. The
written report should be prepared for the type of audience that will be examining it. Each audience will require their unique writing style (Royse,
2011). For example, if the audience is a group of high school students, it would be necessary to write in a less complex writing style.
Project Identification The project identified in this paper is of the Northeastern State University (NSU) Social Work Practicum program. "The
Northeastern State University 's Social Work

Performance Evaluation : Performance Evaluations Essay
Performance evaluations are significant tools to assess how well an individual or a team is performing as well as to help improve quality, productivity,
and efficiency. However, because work has become more team–oriented, performance appraisals now tend to focus on measuring how a team's output
rather than how an individual performs his or her duty. Most of the time, individual's rating is translated from group performance, which raises a lot
issues of fairness and equity when a person does not get what he or she deserves. Therefore, in addition to evaluating the group's output, it is essential to
determine individual's contribution in order to eliminate the complication. This is not always easy, but developing meaningful metrics can help find
and implement the right approach to evaluate individual performance, specifically in the two different situations where a team in a typical college
course and a team in an organization that hopes to make significant improvements to their organization over the next two years. A team in a typical
college course As team–based projects become inevitable in college classrooms, instructors and team leaders are constantly in search of various tools
for members to effectively evaluate one another. Even though creating evaluation methods can be a little daunting, the peer evaluation can be
constructed by articulating specific criteria and ensuring honest participation. For instance, one can rate each team member base on the following rubric:

Professional Evaluation
Introduction
Professional evaluation are much needed assessments for all mental health professionals. These evaluations are critical of keeping supervisees in
boundaries with their clients, identify the clinician's blind spots, discus area of practiced that may be deemed difficult, and establishes a support to
avoid professional burnout. Clinical supervisors has the responsibility of identifying areas of the supervisees that may need attention for improvement.
With the accessibility of supervision, senior clinical colleagues can coach, mentor, and assist junior mental health professionals with a stimulus of
enhancements needed to further develop their quality of care.
The importance of evaluating supervisees by clinical supervision leaders ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Firstly From a developmental perspective should discuss cultural awareness, technological knowledge's, decision–making, interpersonal skills, clinical
skills, analytical skills, and communication skills. Secondly the administrative development should discuss methods, clinical supervisors should also
prepare a new clinical supervisees orientation which will covered an area of areas such as reviewing orientation policies and procedures, conducting
performance reviews, documenting time, work, and experience, and reporting clients rights, incidents, ad ethical issues that may come

Evaluation Of The Training Evaluation Process Essay
Introduction
The training evaluation process is a necessary assessment of the benefits that the organization and the trainee receive from training (Phillips, 2016),
while the performance evaluation is an appraisal process geared to improve employee's performance and skills after training (Gomez–Mejia, Balkin, &
Cardy, 2016, p. 206). These two assessment processes are critical for examining the effectiveness of training and hiring process for the "Wines of the
World" class dinner (or the Dinner) at the University of Denver. Partnered with the African Community Center of the Ethiopian Community
Development Council (ECDC/ACC) who provides Commercial Food Safety and Service (CFaSST) courses to help refugees get training in the
hospitality industry and ultimately find a job, Knoebel School hired CFaSST students to serve the dinner as the capstone for the course. Aware of the
various cultural background and English ability of the CFaSST students, students in human capital class designed customized hiring processes and
individualized training and performance evaluation programs to maximize every CFaSST student's potential.
Upon the successful hosting of the event, the trainer determines that the training program for lead server Zahra was overall successful, and the
performance evaluation indicates that Zahra's performance was well above expectation with possible future development in communication and
leadership. This report discusses the design of the performance appraisal from

Evaluation And Evaluation Of Evaluation
Intro
Evaluation theory is a broad term, there are many different theories and models to follow in an evaluation. An evaluator can pick any when doing an
evaluation, however each as a ground framework they start with. That starting theory can show up when they first begin an evaluation. However the
evaluation determines the theory used to best address the problem or program being evaluated. I interviewed an evaluator, Person A, who explained
that every evaluation and assessment is unique, so her approach was holistic to try to see every necessary variable and she used mix and match
theories she knew to best address the current issues, sometimes changing models when necessary. For the start of planning an evaluation, one should
choose a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One example of a process evaluation she does is to find out student satisfaction of services and to address any inefficiencies. Last year a survey was
emailed to students who used the service at the end of the year. Some strengths of this evaluation was their data collection and survey method were
more efficient after upgrading from paper to electronic resources. With an emailed survey they got a higher response rate than using paper surveys.
However the responses rate was still low since the survey was sent out once at the end of the year. Person A wanted a higher response rate so she
implemented a change by sending out the survey to students shortly after they used the service so she will continuously collect data and be able to
analyze it at the end of each semester. More students have replied since the survey was sent out right after their use instead of asking them about their
experience months later.
Evaluation theory shows up in an evaluation by the model chosen to plan the evaluation. As mentioned earlier Person A approaches each evaluation
holistically and mix and match since every evaluations is different. She believes this because to make improvements, one needs to constantly assess
weaknesses, address them and always strive to keep improving and learning. In always trying new methods to improve and see all the variables so we
can constantly improve, empower and

Evaluation Of A Peer Evaluation System
Peer Evaluation System
Prepared by: Saiaf Bareem
Prepared for: ALLAN CUTLER
Course: MGT4302_010 HR & Communications Project MGT.
Institution name: Algonquin College
2014
Introduction
Peer evaluation is a term that gives a description of the assessment progress that allows learners to self–evaluate their performance together with that of
other learners. Peer evaluation is a valuable assessment that is required in the organization. Any firm that implements peer evaluation has records of
high productivity. The company uses information from the outcome of the assessment to improve on the working conditions of the workers. In
addition, learners who are beneficiaries of peer evaluation have the task of assessing the thinking ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Members participating in the activity will have the chance of learning new things first from themselves and lastly from others. Major emphasis is on the
development of the value of responsibility for individual member in the group.
Peer evaluation gives members with the chance of gaining knowledge when they exchange their feedbacks about the contribution of each other. This
means that the workers have the option of choosing the best alternative for them and their peers in terms of what they consider as the truth. After the
evaluation, the final report from specific members would help members to improve their performance in areas they are considered weak. In addition,
peer evaluation gives members an opportunity to improve on their overall performance within the company. The level of improvement is subject to the
outcome from the evaluation process.
Peer Evaluation
A group leader has the responsibility of controlling the members of the group whenever they are evaluating each other. The group leader then assigns
grades to individual members according to the perceived performance of the member. In identifying the capability of a worker, the group leader has to
collect information from the peer evaluation activity. The idea is to use the evaluation process in assessing the individual performance of the group
member. In the performance of the functionality of assessing the members, the group leader can use two major peer evaluation approaches: the

Staff Evaluation
According to our textbook, Administration of Programs for Young children," An Evaluation is a process that determines whether the goals of an early
childhood center are being met." Being evaluated is an important aspect of teaching. Evaluations can help teachers critique themselves and improve
their teaching skills. However, an evaluation can produce anxiety in those being evaluated. Therefore, it must be done in a way that promotes learning
not negativity. Below is a brief overview of the procedure for a staff evaluation. First, staff evaluations are the responsibility of the Director.
Evaluations are formally done at least once a year. There are times when informal evaluations are performed. Informal evaluations that are done
throughout... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A time is set up for the evaluator to come in. The evaluator is given a copy of the teachers' lesson plan prior to the evaluation. This will allow the
evaluator to monitor how well the lesson went. For example, did the teacher have the necessary materials ready for the lesson and were the children
engaged in the lesson. Furthermore, during the evaluation, the evaluator usually will sit separate from the group. The evaluator will write notes as
they are observing. However, I have found that with young children it is better for the evaluator to be included in the group. This helps to cut down
distraction. For example, when I was evaluated this year I had the principal and head master sit in the circle with us and participate in the lesson. The
children were more engaged this way. They were not distracted by always looking back at them. Finally, after the evaluation, the evaluator fills out the
evaluation form. They write down what the teacher does well. They also write one or two suggestions depending on the need. At a later date the
evaluator will set up a private meeting with the employee to go over the evaluation. It is important that strengths be focused on first when going over
the evaluation. After the meeting the employee will sign the evaluation form. A copy is given to the employee and a copy is maintained in the employees

Evaluation Of A Peer Evaluation System
Peer Evaluation System Name: Institutional Affiliation: Introduction Peer evaluation is a term that gives a description of the assessment progress that
allows learners to self–evaluate their performance together with that of other learners. Peer evaluation is a valuable assessment that is required in the
organization. Any firm that implements peer evaluation has records of high productivity. The company uses information from the outcome of the
assessment to improve on the working conditions of the workers. In addition, learners who are beneficiaries of peer evaluation have the task of
assessing the thinking capability of their peer members and measure how their contribution could benefit the organization. The assessment procedure
double–checks the capability of all the learners and their contribution to making the company productive. Peer evaluation is a process that involves
activities like listening, problem solving and analysis. The activities above help in ensuring that the company succeeds in the implementation of
strategies that the evaluator was evaluating. The procedure of peer evaluation is significant especially in the time of sharpening the skills of the
workers. As a major role in the company, peer evaluation helps in exposing capability of the worker. The use of the concept in the company assists in
giving group members with an opportunity of facing the reality. Members participating in the activity will have the chance of learning new things first
from

Evaluation Of A Training Evaluation
PART C
TRAINING EVALUATION
Contents
Part C – TRAINING EVALUATION2
1.REACTION4
2.LEARNING4
3.BEHAVIOUR4
4.RESULTS5
REFERENCES6
APPENDICES7
APPENDIX A7
Participant Evaluation7
APPENDIX B8
Part C – TRAINING EVALUATION
This section is concerned with evaluation of the programme. This model has five stages and is illustrated in the Training Evaluation Model diagram.
Each stage corresponds to specific data categories:
Describe the outputs. Outputs are descriptive data about the training programs and participants, including demographic data.Pre–training assessment.
This step uncovers the employees' past experience as well as current competencies, learning needs, and expected application of learning.
Post–assessment (reactions). This addresses participants' reactions to the training experience– for example, their learning environment, format and
instructor methods, general satisfaction.
Post–assessment (learning). This piece is a self–assessment of knowledge or skills gained and the participants' expected application of learning.
Follow–up. This process may include several methods to assess the outcomes and effect of training programs over time.
Our model draws from principles in Donald Kirkpatrick's four–level model, in which evaluation questions fall into the following categories: Source:
lecture notes

Reaction: How was the training overall? What did participants like and dislike?
Learning: What knowledge and abilities did participants learn at the

Evaluation Of A Performance Evaluation
Competency 317.1.6: Performance Evaluation
In this paper, I will discuss how to develop and how to recommend and implement an effective performance evaluation process. To begin, I will
define what should be evaluated in a performance evaluation. I will than discuss and compare the relative value of common sets of evaluation
criteria. Next, I will explain how it can be advantageous to have supervisors, peers and subordinates all participate in the evaluation process. Also, I
will explain how it can also be disadvantageous to have supervisors; peers and subordinates to all participate in the evaluation process. Then I will
compare and contrast common performance evaluation methods. I will also give examples of errors and biases that commonly ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
After discussing the three points of concern with the given company's current evaluation form I will now discuss the most commonly used sets of
criteria which should be evaluated in performance evaluation. The three most popular sets of criteria that people are evaluated on are individual task
outcomes, behavior and traits. The first one I will discuss is individual task outcomes. This set of criteria would evaluate an employee based on how
much volume that person is generating for the company. For example, if a worker is working on an assembly line and is producing a certain amount of
parts per hour and is generating a certain amount of scrap per hour as well this would be an individual task outcome. The next popular set of
criteria would be behavior. Behavior is a set of criteria that is evaluated based off how well a employee is able to care and show how they can
contribute to the company in a positive manner depending on the job. For example, a elementary school teacher would be evaluated on her
behavior due to how well she interacts with her class. Is she able to show compassion? Also is she able to show the children that she cares and loves
for them. The next set of criteria that I will discuss is traits. Traits are actually one of the least scored criteria because they do not actually count on job
performance like individual traits. Being able to show that you are competent in what you are doing

Center Evaluation
As I read through this chapter, I realized that evaluation of a center is an idea I'm unfamiliar with. I've participated in evaluations of myself as well as
evaluations of college courses. There is much more to evaluations than just a number that is given. I feel that evaluations give a center the opportunity
to look into what they are currently doing and then further improve themselves. The important parts of having a center evaluation include review goals,
the needs of families and children and finally for the future planning of the center. The director and/or the board of directors may collaborate together in
the evaluation process. There are three major evaluation components that go along with evaluating the center. The three components include the staff,
the child and the program as a whole.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Letting the staff know up front at hire, when their first evaluation will take place. An evaluation of a staff member begins when a director reads the
staff its job description. This allows the staff member and director to talk about what is expected of them. For me personally, I remember when I went
over the job description with my current director. One of the expectations was to carry up possible 30–40lbs and running after children. This is when I
was able to discuss with my director my knee and hip situation and why at times I may not be able to do those tasks. The discussion went way better
than expected and now my director knows why I may be sitting down or not running out during outside time. As a staff member continues to go through
the evaluation process, it's important for director to evaluate on many different levels. The one part I found interesting from the book was when it
stated that a director shouldn't just look at how a staff interacts with the children but also how they interact with other

Evaluation Techniques
TASK–3
P3.1: Preparing an evaluation on introduction training program
At the leading period of techniques the risk analysis confers the methods to finding and addressing corporate risks, security and survivable threats. The
additional discussion of approaches is inability evaluation defines the variety of new and observational lines recycled to control the inability of scheme
types in all phases of the scheme growth existence set. Figure: Evaluation techniques
Source:
Risk analysis: The evaluation techniques are described in HSBC some generally castoff outfits for possibility managing together with disappointment
styles and belongings exploration and responsibility hierarchy breakdown. These implements are malleable and can be recycled ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The HSBC bank gets effectiveness by evaluation techniques on the training event which is based on HSBC objectives such as
Measuring inability on budgets: The HSBC financial valuation of a training group is vital in that it runs valuable visions into Return On Investment
(ROI). This debt of HSBC is rest on assessing how radiant the staffs applied the talents which are knowledgeable in the training event.
Reviewing to the learners: To the greatest simple evaluation of training events fulfilment generally the trainer will pointers out a review at the finish of
the sequence to understand how the members responded to the training. HSBC send out an automated review to extent satisfaction charges with our
training developments.
Future training program background: In HSBC basic is for reliable ability up stage not ever misplaces its standing. Come again was said to be an
operative training stage in the former could not be so currently. HSBC need to unceasingly adjust it to outfit on their current requirements. This is
conceivable when this bank get to recognize how active the previous training policy existed.
P3.3: Reviewing the success of the evaluation methods used.
In general, the measure of the assessment task compares with the proportions of the activity. More than a few activities have an evaluation element
which is self–governing of the working unions in HSBC. HSBC discovery that upholding a self–determining evaluation entity types

Training Evaluation
Evaluation involves the assessment of the effectiveness of the training programs. This assessment is done by collecting data on whether the participants
were satisfied with the deliverables of the training program, whether they learned something from the training and are able to apply those skills at their
workplace. There are different tools for assessment of a training program depending upon the kind of training conducted.Since organisations spend a
large amount of money, it is therefore important for them to understand the usefulness of the same. For example, if a certain technical training was
conducted, the organisation would be interested in knowing whether the new skills are being put to use at the workplace or in other words... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
While they can be used to improve the training, they should NOT be interpreted to show how effective the training was. End–of–course evaluations (or
"smile sheets") identify whether someone liked the training or whether they thought the training was effective. Here are some tips for making the most
out of this type of evaluation: * Determine the purpose. * Create specifically for each training: Avoid using "one–size fits all". If you have a standard
form, customize it by adding questions specific to your course. * Write majority of questions close–ended: Getting anecdotal quotes from students is
interesting and makes for good marketing. However, few of us have time to conduct a content analysis on the comments. Use more quantitative
measures. * Balance positive and negative questions: Asking participants to list the most important things about the training without asking about
the least important things leads to an imbalanced, biased feedback. * Ask questions about transfer and impact: Go beyond the traditional smile
sheet. Ask "What, if anything, will make it difficult for you to use your new skills on the job?" "Will your manager be able to help you with your
new skills?" "How confident are you that you will be able to use your new skills on the job?" "How do you expect your job to change as a result of
using these new skills?" * Provide time: Give time and expect participants to use the allotted time to complete the feedback thoroughly

Evaluation And Evaluation Of Evaluation
Participant–oriented approaches to evaluation at present include many different models, but they share one thing in common that they all use
stakeholders in the program to assist in conducting the evaluation. However, they may use them to attain different goals and employ in different ways.
This mini paper will present three evaluation approaches that involving stakeholders in the evaluation process, which are participatory evaluation,
developmental evaluation, and empowerment evaluation. Participatory evaluation Jean King in the Encyclopedia of Evaluation defines participatory
evaluation as "an overarching term for any evaluation approach that involves program staff or participants actively in decision making and other
activities related to the planning and implementation of evaluation studies" (Fitzpatrick, Sanders, and Worthen, 2011, p.199). However, the type and
level of stakeholder involvement will certainly vary between different types, for instance between a local level impact evaluation and an evaluation of
policy changes (Guijt, 2014). Therefore, it is essential to consider the purpose of involving stakeholders, and which stakeholders should be involved and
how, in order to maximise the effectiveness of the approach. Participatory evaluation are distinguished by four characteristics, as follows: 1.Direct and
active participant involvement over time in evaluation planning and implementation. It is stakeholder based or consumer focused. 2.Participants
ownership

Program Evaluation Time–Out is the title for the proposed program, providing prevention and solution–based services to African American high school
student–athletes in Hampton, Virginia (Baskerville, 2015). To begin with, this paper will provide a comprehensive program evaluation model for the
program. Secondly, it will outline the evaluation framework the program will use to evaluate the program. Next, the paper will provide a timeline
detailing when critical evolution task for the program will take place. Leading to, how program evaluation will maintain the program's sustainability.
From there, the paper will explain how the evaluation results will be shared with the stakeholders and the community. In conclusion, it will discuss
strategies to create a culture of evaluation within the program. Theoretical framework The program evaluation begins with the program design to
assess overall effectiveness and efficiency of implementation of the program (Calley, 2011). To illustrate the program evaluation, a theoretical
framework has been developed using Calley's Comprehensive Program Development Model's for the proposed program, using the three major
evaluations: fidelity assessment, process evaluation, outcomes evaluation. Fidelity Assessment Fidelity assessment evaluates a program's ability to
implement its original program design. With that said, the Treatment Fidelity Assessment Checklist will be used to assess the program's fidelity. In
other words, the

Evaluation Of Evaluation And Performance Measurement
This paper is a review of Chapters 10, 11 and 12 in McDavid, Huse, and Hawthorn (2012) second edition, Program Evaluation and Performance
Measurement: An Introduction to Practice. Chapter 10 reviews performance measurements systems and how they are used, their effect and
accountability. Evaluators and program managers and their connection is reviewed in Chapter 11. Additionally, how this connection is affected by
the evaluation purpose and organizational contexts. Chapter 12 deals with the methodology of a good evaluation and points out that there has not
been an agreed upon method of choice. This paper contains (1) an overview of the chapters, (2) summarize the key points, (3) summary of the
reading, and (4) underscore some implications/applications for policy and practice at a local, state or national context. Chapter 10 discusses
performance measures and the results that are used by the client (elected leaders). There is question as to whether elected officials actually use
performance information and or reports that is supplied to them when making their decisions. The British Columbia (B.C.) Legislature, in 2000,
passed the Budget Transparency and Accountability Act, which was a law mandating annual performance plans and annual performance reports for
all departments and agencies and was amended in 2001 (McDavid, Huse, & Hawthorn, 2012, p.379). Once in 2003, 2005 and 2007, all elected
members were surveyed each time the performance reports were received. In each

Evaluation Of The Execution Of An Evaluation
Program Evaluation Chapters 11 & 12 Warranting the execution of an evaluation is not practical reality for all programs, policies, organizations, as it is
imperative for the evaluator to assess all factors. More specifically, "The temptation to evaluate everything may be compelling in an idealistic sense, but
it ignores many practical realities" (Fitzpatrick, Sanders & Worthen, 2011, p. 259. Ones' ability to identify appropriate opportunities requires essential
skillsets, knowledge, and the ability to analyze each condition. In today's society the primary drive behind an evaluation is due to a mandated funding
source, thus seeking accountability regarding public funded programs (Fitzpatrick, Sanders & Worthen, 2011). Identifying the purpose of the
evaluation is often times vague, requiring the evaluator to examine significant materials pertaining to the stakeholders, as well as properly identifying
objectives and expectancies held by the stakeholders (Fitzpatrick, Sanders & Worthen, 2011). This process requests the evaluator to review the purpose
of the program, the users, the program, program theory, relevant resources, and appropriate contextual issues. The evaluation process can have
significant positive impacts on both the stakeholders and the evaluator, as communication, knowledge, and relationships are established. Thus,
"Evaluation can also educate stakeholders, empowering them to become active in the evaluations, by helping them gain skills in questioning

Training And Development Evaluation : Evaluation
Training and Development Evaluation
James Hooks
Brandman University
OLCU 646: Training and Development
October 19, 2014
Theoretical Framework
Performance improvement and organizational development professionals work to ascertain measurable benchmarks of talent functions, often through
scientific, systemic processes (Kaplan & Norton, 2001). Organizations that seek successful performance require indicators of effectiveness, as the
evaluation of organizational effectiveness provides to training and development professionals essential feedback to promote organizational success. It
also delivers critical information to organizational stakeholders, from employees to the community. It is challenging for organizations to... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
While flexible, Kirkpatrick's framework is utilized by organizations to determine their return on training investment, and their effect or organizational
performance.
Definition and Measurement of Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Framework
Kirkpatrick believed that evaluation was an oft–neglected factor of existing organizational training models (Kirkpatrick, 1994). He developed the four
levels of evaluation model to urge organizational leaders to increase evaluation efforts. Measuring the effectiveness of training deliverables for an
organization is essential to its success; one does not want to expend energy on training that does not deliver a good return on the time investment. The
four level models of training assists in objectively evaluating the training's impact and effectiveness, so that it may be developed and perfected in the
future.
Reaction. The reaction level of Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework measures how organizational members are being trained, and how trainees feel
about the training (DeSimone & Werner, 2012). It is important for trainees to determine that any training they performed was a valuable experience,

which includes: their feelings about the instructor; the methods used that the instructor coached them; the topic of the training and its

Formative Evaluation
Influence of the formative evaluation In this section, I will analyze the meaning attached to the feedback provided in the final summative evaluation
in a question by question format. I am better equipped to make career decisions. I was hoping to reach a higher median than 3,5 in this category
since this is was the program's primary focus. I believe that this goal was being realized towards the end of the program during the performing stage.
Until we adjusted the activities in our program to have less self–reflection and more discussion about the real world, we were not fostering this goal. It
would have been wise to read more articles on youth engagement before starting the program. I now have a clearer vision of my future. One participant
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I expected this category to receive a low rating since we completely removed any self–reflection from our program. This is far too demanding from a
young population that has not experienced enough of life to determine what it is they want. It is also my suspicion that a group setting is a not
appropriate for any self–reflection. Participants may fear the judgment of others, for example. I am more conscious of my qualities. This was
originally the objective of one of our sessions. We ended up removing this objective and it's attached activities from the sessions to make room for
more immediately applicable information. This objective became irrelevant to us, but the 3,5 median rating suggest we had some small impact on this
dimension. I have taken action towards the goals I outlined in this program. This question is used to see if there were any lasting effects of our
program as we went through it. A 3,5 rating suggests that there was some action being taken by participants as we moved along the program. More
discussion about their particular obstacles could have helped participants take action and thus improved the score on this question. The facilitators
communicated information

Evaluation Of Evaluation And Assessment Essay
Evaluation and Assessment. The best practice of evaluation and assessment include the evaluation in each courses and the overall assessment of the
whole program. Evaluation and assessment section is an inevitable portion of quality control. DE with much integration of technology, especially needs
evaluation and assessment. In the OU of the UK, the Governance Effective Reviews take place every year. In the website, it states:
An annual effectiveness review appraises business and decision–making against the terms of reference for all University committees providing
opportunity to consider and implement changes when required, and between major governance reviews. A more detailed (major) review of
effectiveness and performance benchmarked against guidance set out in external Codes of Governance, regulatory requirements and good practice
elsewhere in the higher education sector is intended to take place every five years. (Academic Structure, n.d., Section 3)
In the OUC, the professional quality assessment does not exist both internal and external. The existing quality assessment mechanism is superficial and
not functional. Due to the concept of saving face, few colleagues or leaders want to criticize other teachers. In the schools, the faculty believe in
Guanxi, which is the widely used unspoken soft power. Generally, colleagues want to build their network of Guanxi as soon as possible. The
immediate supervisors also want to build and enlarge their network, so they do not want to

Evaluation Of A Clinical Evaluation Essay
With the continuous changes in healthcare, evaluation of students' clinical knowledge and skills relies on the need for continuous evaluation.
Evaluation is the process of using data to make judgements about students' individual performance. Evaluation of clinical performance provides data
from which educators use to judge the extent to which students have acquired specific learning outcomes (Billings & Halstead, 2016). With the use of
best practice evaluation methods, clinical performance can be evaluated to ensure quality patient care. Educators face a challenging task when providing
evaluation that is fair and reasonable. Tasked with evaluating students in the clinical setting, educators can evaluate how students integrate theory and
apply it to real–life situations. Observations of performance in the clinical setting should focus on the outcomes to be met and competencies to be
developed (Oermann & Gaberson, 2014). Developing a clinical evaluation tool to determine whether students can think critically, prioritize problems,
and complete patient care procedures correctly is essential. There are a variety of evaluation methods to use in nursing education. Depending on the
learning outcomes to be measured will determine which tool best evaluates the students' performance. Clinical practice is an essential and highly
significant component of nursing education. Education programs are obligated to respond to government requests for well–educated healthcare
professionals.

GLSA Evaluation
Evaluation The evaluation of the programs functioning under the GLSMA was a very important component of the law, as grant recipients were
required to evaluate their services on a consistent basis. There were several different evaluation methods that were utilized to track the implementation
and outcomes of the GLSMA programming (Goldston et al., 2010). The Suicide Prevention Data Center (SPDC) was developed to allow grantees to
collect and manage data obtained from their prevention and early interventions programs. In doing so, they were complying with the GLSMA's
requirement of participation in the National Incomes Evaluation. This online system allowed grantees to share their evaluation activities, manage their
data, and disseminate... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
House Republicans proposed the clause, as many did not believe that suicide should be discussed openly in schools without parental permission
("Suicide Prevention Funding", n.d.). However, requiring parental consent could seemingly defeat the original purpose of the legislation. This
amendment was based on the ideology that parents know how to best educate their children. However, it was argued that this clause could limit young
people's willingness to access services, as they would be required to inform their parents, which could pose issues for many youth ("Suicide Prevention
Funding", n.d.). Additionally, the clause could negatively impact lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. It could deter them from seeking help
due to fear of parental rejection, even though they are at an even higher risk of suicide ("Suicide Prevention Funding", n.d.). Although there were no
major unintended consequences identified in relation to the programming under the GLSMA, it is evident that its parental permission amendment
could pose problems for the population it aims to

Evaluation Of Assessment And Evaluation
Assessment and Evaluation Introduction Assessment and Evaluation are two very different aspects in the realm of education that appears to be
fairly similar, both are the different sides of the same coin which is testing. The marked differences in both assessment and evaluation are especially
important. Assessment refers to the referral and collection of data to describe or better understand an issue, whereas evaluation is done by referring
to data by comparing data in order to judge and decide if the program or syllabus is up to a certain standard or quality. Assessment takes variables into
account, as patterns that are consistent in data that are liable to changes can be taken into account. Assessment is the measurement of data, and the
results the syllabus has produced, how students have processed the material and the various approaches, both prior and after the whole process.
Educators will then be able to gauge student's progress and level in a subject. Both assessment and evaluation will enable educators and the school
administrators to tailor the syllabus and program according to the type of students. Assessment is more of a progress – collecting data as students
progress along. Evaluation is a review of the whole journey, a summary of what students have achieved, and what can be improved and altered to fit
and cater to students. Assessments are goal–oriented, objectives have to be reached, and achieved. To effectively evaluate, educators have to have
sufficient

Evaluation Of A Summative Evaluation
Component Two
Type of evaluation The type of evaluation that will be conducted will be a summative evaluation. The summative evaluation will be conducted at the
end of the program to see if the goals of the program were accomplished. Were the children able to learn about nutrition
Evaluation Goals
1)To determine if this program is successful in educating the children in various cooking techniques.
2)To help children in a low income area discover affordable ways to meal preparation.
3)To determine if the program can be conducted in other low in come areas.
Evaluation Questions
1)Are the children committed to coming to the class on a weekly basis?
2)Is the program providing the children with life skills they can apply at home?
3)Are the children enjoying the program?
Rationale
The rationale of this evaluation is to confirm that the goals of the program are being meet. That the children are being educated in making healthy
choices and participating in the program. In order for the evaluation to be accurate research needs to determine if the program will be effective.
Component Three
Literature Review Learning how to cook is an essential life skill that not only children need but youth as well. In an article by Jessica Herbert and her
fellow authors they mentioned how by participating in a cooking program it helps children gain a new perspective on cooking (Herbert et al.2014).
Mardie Townsend mentioned in the article Volunteering in a School Kitchen Garden

Evaluation Of An Effective Evaluation Process
Data gathering, reviewing, and analyzation is a very important step in an effective evaluation or assessment process. The outcome as well as any
subsequent suggestions are based on the data and review provided during the initial process. Guerra–Lopez (2008) emphasized that the success of an
evaluation process is contingent upon five particular aspects about data and data sources: 1) data relevance, 2) data collection, 3) evaluating data, 4)
data reporting, and 5) avoiding data errors. These five items contribute to an improved method and technique to build a better performance evaluation
and supports the statistical finds and the qualitative impact of the communicated results. Data is used as a tool to measure various aspects within the...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
133). Guerra–Lopez (2008) suggested some primary sources of data as those that most commonly and readily available such as financial records,
social input sources, and political realms. More specifically, Guerra–Lopez (2008) claimed that an organizations internal sources of data input are often
used as a means to identify prior performance and assessments needs and results. These sources identified by Guerra–Lopez are as follows.
Strategic plan: Management's source for communicating the organization's vision, business plan, goals, and objectives. Describes the organizations
prior outcomes and outlook for the future of the company.
Annual reports: Identifies the immediate and potential future financial standing for the organization.
Project plans: List individual areas of concentration that connect directly with the organization's overall strategic plan. It compartmentalizes the
objectives of different divisions within the organization based on function and potential.
Consulting studies: An independent study focused on a narrow window of assessment. These studies are not evaluations in that they are not geared
towards measuring the outcome of a program or event but instead they are formed to review processes without labeling or assigning judgment or
measurements.

Introduction The purpose of a program evaluation is to assess working programs and determine if the outcomes are sufficiently effective (Houser,
2015). Program Evaluations are a type of action research leading to improved programs and services for the designated populations. Feedback from
stakeholders is necessary to confirm the program is operating to the highest quality and standards (Astramovich & Coker, 2007). The program
conducted serves adult military personnel who are diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The program implements Cognitive
Behavioral Therapy (CBT) through a twelve–week program consisting of twenty–four, sixty minute sessions. The stakeholders include military
personnel and their family, veterans and their family, The U.S. Department of Veterans Affair, and the U.S. Government. The program will be dissected
in order to identify the goals, data and instrumentation, data analysis, and dissemination of the program evaluation.
Goals of the Program Evaluation The first goal of the CBT program is to identify methods for implementing CBT on to military bases to support
military personnel who have been diagnosed with PTSD. The first data point supports the goal through a qualitative focus group with the deliverance of
a psychoeducation on PTSD to military personnel and their families. A second data point to support the program is the use of quantitative structured
interviews with military personnel and family members about their experience

According to Mertens and Wilson, program evaluation is a systematic method for collecting, analyzing, and using information to answer questions
about projects, policies and programs, particularly about their effectiveness and efficiency. Stakeholders often want to know whether the programs they
are funding and supporting are effective. While program evaluation first focuses on the effectiveness of the program, other important factors to take
into consideration is cost of the program, improvements that could be made, outcomes of the program, and usefulness of the program. Evaluators help
to answer these questions, and stakeholders have to work with the evaluators in order to come to the best conclusion about the effectiveness of a
program so that all aspects are taken into consideration. Program evaluations can involve both quantitative and qualitative methods of research. People
who do program evaluation come from many different backgrounds, such as sociology, psychology, economics, social work, and public policy. Some
graduate schools also have specific training programs for program evaluation. Rossi, Lipsey and Freeman suggest the following kinds of assessment,
which may be appropriate at these different stages: assessment of the need for the program, assessment of program design and logic/theory, assessment
of how the program is being implemented, assessment of the program 's outcome or impact, assessment of the program 's cost and efficiency, and
assessing needs.

Evaluation Of A Employee Evaluation System
Introduction The company has an evaluation system that is not meeting the organizational objectives or developing the employees. Problems have
arisen with the current evaluation reporting system because rating officials are too generous when evaluating employees. The organization's employee
evaluation format does not force the rating officials to be honest when evaluating their employee's potential and performance. Rating officials are not
trained on rating techniques and don't provide quality feedback and establish employee goals that align with the organizational goals of the company.
Poorly administered evaluations can undermine employee morale and be used by disgruntled employees against employers in litigation (Woodford &
Doyle,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Additionally redesigning the evaluation form will help develop personnel by establishing clearly defined individual goals and company goals that
align with the organizational goals. Feedback is necessary for this process to work. Employees should not be surprised when they receive their annual
performance evaluation because they have clearly identified goals that they must meet and have received at least semi–annual feedback on the progress
towards these goals. When everyone is supposedly doing a fantastic job it makes it challenging to determine who the true standouts are for promotions
and recognition. Opponents of evaluations systems argue that evaluations lead to higher turnover rates and added discontentment of supervisors and
managers who loathe the time, paperwork and discomfort that accompany the evaluation process (Woodford & Doyle, 2011). These challengers must
be reminded of the purpose of evaluations, they are used to reward, recognize, and compensate employees who perform well. Summary of Problems
with the Current Evaluation System During the research on the importance of a successful evaluation system several problems with our current system
were identified. It seems most organizations face the same basic challenges of communication, lack of supervisor training, and competing requirement
being the biggest challenge. Below are the

Performance Evaluations : The Performance Evaluation Process
Performance Evaluations are a headache to many managers in the employment community. They can make it difficult to have a great workplace
connection. In addition, they make it hard to accomplish goal performances. The performance evaluation system is a dislike process by em–ployees
and their supervisors. According to Chan & Yung (2002), "The performance evaluation is quite subjective since it relies on the individual judgements
of supervisors who have different per–ceptions of the process performance" (p. 237). According to research, majority of personnel hates the
performance evaluation process from beginning to end. It is known that managers really hate the day to day procedures when it comes to finalizing a
performance evaluation. In order to be an effective manager, they will need to have the distinguish traits. This paper will explain if there is a profile
need for a manager that struggles during the performance evaluation process. Now on the other hand, it is important for managers to understand the
key elements of the performance evaluation process. The main reason that many managers hate the performance evaluation process initially is that it's
aggravating. The initial reason for managers disliking the performance evaluation process is because they do not know their workers. In addition, there
many instances when the managers will have to rely on others to paint a picture of the employee during the performance evaluation process. There are

Evaluation Of The Role Of Formative And Summative Evaluation
Evaluation Evaluation is central to clinical supervision to perform as gatekeeping functions that require responsibility placed on supervisors (Bernard
and Goodyear, 2014). Evaluation provides clear distinction between counseling and supervision (Inskipp, 1996). Distinction between formative and
summative evaluation is key when supervising (Bernard and Goodyear, 2014). Formative evaluations provide direct and observational skill based
feedback through weekly documentation for supervisors to assess supervisees' effectiveness as a professional in training (Bernard and Goodyear,
2014). Summative evaluations provide an overall picture to decide whether goals and progress met standards and expectations of supervisors (Bernard
and Goodyear, 2014). Summative evaluations used mostly in educational settings, seek to make decisions among supervisees. In conjunction with
supervisors and education coordinators making decisions about the supervisee, the amount of time invested filling out evaluations is crucial to present
clear and distinct assessments for those being evaluated (Bernard and Goodyear, 2014). Supervisee Evaluation As evaluation involves supervisees and
supervisors, budding practitioners have difficulty being honest for fear of failure by supervisors. This fear can in turn create anxiety that leads to low
self–efficacy thus, less utilization of advanced skills for distress in being evaluated (Timm, 2015). Utilizing person–centered counseling techniques to
ease

Process Evaluation

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Process Evaluation

Similar to Process Evaluation (20)

More from Mariana Arnold

More from Mariana Arnold (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Process Evaluation