Essay On Blending Good And Evil In The Master And Margarita

Essay on Blending Good and Evil in the Master and Margarita
In Bulgakov's The Master and Margarita, Woland has created some kind of partnership with Yeshua Ha
–Nozri. He explains to Matthu Levi, a mere
mortal, that he is misunderstood by fools. Woland is simply an alternate interpretation of the Devil. During his short conversation with Matthu
Levi he asks him what good deeds are they able to do if there is no evil to right. "You spoke the words as though you did not recognize the existence of
either shadows or evil. But would you be kind enough to give some thought to this: what would your good be doing if there were no evil, and what
would the earth look like if shadows disappeared from it? Even after Woland has burned down a fair portion of Moscow as well as created commotion
among the lives of... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He delivers the message that Yeshua wants the master to be granted peace. Yeshua does not possess the power to do this task himself and asks that
Woland do it. Woland can obviously do it easily. The Master is given peace, not light in the end because he has acquiesced to the pressure on him
from society. The master's one flaw is that he is a coward, like Pontius Pilate. Because of this one fact he is given peace, not light. Yeshua did not
blame anyone for his death, furthermore he did not seize the opportunity to be free when he was offered it. Pontius Pilate has eternally tormented
himself for being a coward and not doing anything to save Yeshua. Yeshua's intentions are rather clear when he gets Woland to bring the Master to free
Pilate. Woland's ultimate business in Moscow was to locate the Master and get the novel from him. Although he has caused a great deal of trouble for
characters such as Varenuhka, Styopa, Ivan, and Rimsky, he has ultimately served his purpose as the justice
–bringer to the flawed as well as allowing
Yeshua to right his wrongs. During the aftermath of Satan's Ball, he allows the various characters to return to their original roles. However, it is not
without consequence. For example he only lets Varenuhka return if he promises never to be rude over the phone again. Woland has punished
evil–doers. It is in this very apartment where Woland refers to the tasks of "other departments". "Every department must take care
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Paul Maier's Pontius Pilate
Pontius Pilate was a book written by Paul Maier in 1968. This book is a historical fiction and it is about the governor from Judea who leads over
the Jesus's trial. The governor's name is Pontius Pilate. The book is in Pilate's perspective and it was very interesting to see someone else's view.
This book guided and helped me understand cultural as well as political background of the Gospels. This book had many parallels to the teachings of
the Bible and it was really interesting to me because I have never read a biblical novel before. There were many points that I liked about this book.
First, the historical information that is provided by Pontius Pilate is far more interesting than what I read in history textbooks throughout high school
years. I did not have any idea how Roman politics worked and what it actually was. However, Paul Maier described the Roman politics very well with
examples from different characters and events that happened during that time. Also, this book helped me understand how Pontius Pilate might have felt
during the time of Jesus's trial. The tension between Jewish leaders and Pontius Pilate was huge and Pilate was probably hugely burdened and stressed
out. Coming off of that, we can tell how first century Jews viewed the interaction between religion and government. Roman government felt ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Pontius Pilate did not want to sentence Jesus's death and even tried saving him couple of times. For example, when Pilate was reminded that it was
customary to free a prisoner during the festival, he tried to use this as an excuse to release Jesus. However, the people chose another person, Barabbas.
Barabbas was a criminal who committed robbery and murder. People chose to save this criminal over someone who did not commit any sin. Pontius
Pilate must have been really frustrated with this decision and how stubborn these people

A Greco Roman Audience On The Gospel Of Luke
A Greco–Roman Audience
Readers of the Gospel of Luke often try to identify Luke's intended audience. Understanding Luke's intended audience can provide insight into how
Luke used current culture to strategically spread the word of God. Specifically, we can look at the period of Hellenization, along passages, to interpret
Luke's Gospel as intended for a Greco–Roman audience.
After the campaigns of Alexander the Great, but before the Birth of Jesus, Palestine endured a period of Hellenization. This period of Hellenization
brought a sense of unity to Alexander's empire, as Greek culture, language, politics and religions spread. Greek culture was so strong that even the
Hebrew kings felt compelled to take Greek names in an effort to integrate. However, Alexander's rule did not last for long. Eventually, King Herod took
control, splitting the empire into three parts, two of which were ruled by Herod's sons. The Herodian dynasty brought Roman influences in
architecture, language, economics and culture, mixing with the Greco–influence from Alexander's reign. Jesus was born into a world filled with
Greco–Roman culture. Thus, it was imperative that Luke understood the culture and framed his writing in a way that attracted the Greco–Romans.
Luke begins his Gospel, which was written in Greek, with a dedication to Theophilus, "It seemed good to me also, having followed all things closely
for some time past, to write and orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus..."(Luke

The Passion And The Passion
One of the most memorable part of Jesus' life on Earth is known as the Passion. The Passion alludes to the suffering and death of Jesus Christ by
crucifixion on Mount Calvary. Jesus predicted these occasions and made it clear to his disciples that he would suffer freely for the salvation of the
world.
After his Last Supper, Jesus was captured in the Garden of Gethsemane outside the walls of Jerusalem. There was a trial in which Jesus was found
guilty and was then handed over to Pontius Pilate who had him crucified. He was crowned with thorns and was led to the hill of Calvary carrying his
cross to be crucified. Then Jesus "himself bore our sins in his body upon the cross, so that, free from sin, we might live for righteousness. By his wound
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These accounts show both solidarity and differing qualities. Solidarity in having one Jesus Christ, and differing qualities in depiction from 4
particular points/viewpoint. The 4 accounts are of Matthew, Luke, John, and Mark. Matthew depicts Jesus as the Jewish Messiah, the fulfillment of
Old Testament hopes. For Luke, Jesus is the savior all individuals everywhere. He embodies forgiveness for others. For Mark, Jesus is the suffering
son of God who offers himself as a sacrifice for sins. And John, present Jesus as the divine son who reigns even from the Cross. Instead of contradicting
each other, these representations complement each one.
All through the Gospel, the passion of Christ is already being "predicted". In John 2:18–22, Jesus' predicted that the Jews would destroy His body
(temple), but He would rebuild it in three days. Moreover, in Matthew 16:21 – Jesus plainly told the disciples that He would be killed and would rise
again the third day. When Jesus made these predictions, He verifies that He is the son of God, and shows and tells that "God is taking charge" (NT
Wright). Jesus foretold what would happen and then His "offer" became

Disparity Between Passion of the Christ and the Bible Essay
"The Passion of the Christ" by Mel Gibson, recounts the last twelve hours of the life of Jesus of Nazareth, portraying his arrest, trial, crucifixion and
death. One of the most anticipated and popular religious movies in modern society, it therefore becomes susceptible to criticism. Although the film is
based upon the stories within the four gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, there are many exaggerations and non–biblical elements present in
the movie. This is not unexpected, since it is a movie, but the vivid detail of the brutality in the movie as well as the Anti–Semitic theme are the most
publicly criticized themes and concepts present in the movie. The Passion emphasizes the brutality Jesus endured to give himself for his ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the scenes of the movie, he is preaching his peace and ideas of independence, but the high priests and the Jewish people do not show him any
mercy or respect. Even at the voice of the governor Pontius Pilate, who several times mentions that he doesn't find any guilt or reason to persecute
Jesus, the people still wish for his crucifixion. The movie did not really make sense of the motivation of the Jewish high priests or the Jewish people,
and it was not explained in the gospels either. However, in Mark 15; 10–11, it suggests that Pontius Pilate "realized that it was out of jealousy that the
chief priests had handed Jesus over. The chief priests, however, had incited the crowd to demand that he should release Barabbas for them instead".
Therefore, according to the Bible, the chief priests were envious of Jesus, and that is why they condemned him to be crucified. It was an act of panic
more than anything else. The people, fearing to be considered outcasts, therefore agreed with whatever the high priests would say. This still does not
explain why the Jewish people were so quick to have their savior and messiah killed. The movie suggests that they all felt passionately about this
themselves, because all the people in the scenes are adamantly screaming for his death, but the gospels do not explain it. The appearance of Satan
within several important scenes of the movie is also something that is not found within the Bible. Satan appears

Gaius Cilo: Pliny The Younger
Gaius Caecilius or Gaius Caesilius Cilo best known as Pliny the younger was a lawyer, author and magistrate ( a civil officer or lay judge who
administers the law, especially one who conducts a court that deals with minor offenses and holds preliminary hearings for more serious ones.) for
Ancient Rome. Pliny has written hundreds of letters and many of them can be found or what we would call "surviving," a lot of these letters provide
insight to how things were in the time they were written. Some of Pliny the Younger 's letters were addressed to the reigning emperors at that time one
of particular interest is the one written to Trajan(reigned 98–117). This letter was a big deal because of its contents as well as the fact that there is now
record of a relationship between the imperial and the provinces. The letter was written about 112 and it is one of the earliest documents alive that refer
to the early Christians.
The context of the letter written by Pliny the Younger written to Trajan was concerning how to go about this whole idea of persecuting Christians.
After the 1st century and Nero really persecuting the Christians things begin to calm down for Christians in the later centuries. In Bithynia Suspected
Christians were appearing before him from anonymous accusations so with unclear laws and no accusations for people being Christians Pliny the
Younger had to consult on how to handle any persecution against Christians.
The letter was written to Trajan who was an

Pontius Pilate Influence On Jesus Plate
Pontius Pilate was a Roman governor who overlooked Judea. To me, he was made out to seem like a weak leader in the gospels, however in all
actuality, he was a harsh and strong governor. He could arguably be considered the single man who changed history as we know it. The gospels do
not explain much about Pilate and his background. The only time he was really introduced was during the trial of Jesus. He was acknowledged a few
times to show he was the one who followed through with the crucifixion, and then he ceased to be brought back up again. However, the book Pontius
Pilate by Paul L. Maier thoroughly and adequately illustrates Pilate's life before and after the life–changing verdict. This was a fascinating read that
really captivated my interest. It was long and at times hard to follow, but I was extremely intrigued with the eccentric details that Maier provided. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I never understood how serious the division was but Pontius Pilate helped inform me of the magnitude. There was serious tension since Pilate was
governor over Jews and that ultimately affected his decisions. He went so far as to use Jesus being on trial as a way to manipulate the Jews to
admit they had no king but Caeser. This was a confidence booster for Pilate because it reaffirmed his authority of Rome. Not surprisingly, he didn't
stop there. Pilate made sure the Jews felt guilty about the crucifixion. It was said that Pilate washed his hands clean of Jesus' blood. After, the
Jews replied by saying, "His blood be on us and on our children" (238). Pilate operated the whole production so the blame would be focused on the
Jews and not him. I was very shocked to see such evil works from a man. I didn't know how intense the rivalry between the Jews and Gentiles were,
but it was clearly big enough for Pilate to influence a trial, Jesus' trial, for his own selfish,

Song of Solomon
Toni Morrison's award–winning novel Song of Solomon is full of very interesting, deep symbolism. Macon Dead III, nicknamed "Milkman," is a very
symbolic character throughout the novel. His character is not only symbolic, for so is his name. Also, Milkman's paternal aunt, Pilate, has an extremely
significannot and symbolic role in the novel. To her father, she represents the child who killed her own mother and took away her father's wife. Seeing
that Pontius Pilate sentenced Jesus to death, the name Pilate seems to coincide with her father, Macon Dead's, opinion. Ironically, though, Pilate is a
good person and is murdered in the end, just as Jesus was by Pontius Pilate. Another important character in the novel who portrays a great deal of ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The fact that she depends so heavily upon her son reveals the numerous insecurities she has about herself. It is the character and the name of Milkman
Dead that enlighten readers of these highly significannot facts and symbols throughout the novel.
 
 Though Milkman is a very symbolic character in Song of Solomon, he is not the only one. Pilate also has both a very symbolic character and
name. First of all, her name is derived from the biblical name of Pontius Pilate, the man who sentenced Jesus to death on the cross. This name is very
symbolic of her father's feelings toward her. Although her father does not purposely choose her name, considering he can't read, it quickly comes to
signify the fact that her father feels that Pilate killed her mother, seeing as that her mother died during childbirth. Ironically, however, Pilate is
murdered at the end of the book when she and Milkman go to give her father a proper burial.
 
 Pilate also represents a great deal more than a murderer. She has a large part of her mother's spirit in her because although, physically, her
mother dies while giving birth to her, part of her soul enters Pilate, so part of her literally lives in her daughter. Therefore, when Pilate is killed during
the burial of her father, it shows that both she and her mother are tired of life, they have both lived it to the fullest, and they both want to rest in peace
with Pilate's father.

The Book of John
John
The book of John was written in AD 90, and it was written by John himself "the beloved disciple." The main characters of the book of John were of
course John and Jesus. The book of John was one of the four Gospels of the New Testement. However, it was different than the others. "John's Gospel
is different by nature from the other three. It is an interpretation of the facts of Jesus' life with an emphasis of His deity" (Hindson & Towns, 2013, p.
342). The book of John first tells us about Jesus' preexistence and that this child would be born unlike any other child and that child would not
depend on a mother, but He would depend on His father; God. This book tells us about all the miracles that He did. He fed thousands with five
loaves of bread and two fish, he healed a lame man, and calmed a storm. Then the book of John goes to tell us about Jesus being arrested and the
trials that He went through. Also, about Pilate trying to release Him, but could not. It was made up that He was to be crucified. He then was
crucified and to make sure that He was dead they pierced his side. In the last chapters of John, it tells us that Jesus was buried in a tomb and He lay
there for three days. After the third day, the tomb had been opened and Jesus was gone. He had risen!
Pontius Pilate
Pontius Pilate was a Roman governor. He was introduced in the book of John during Jesus' arrest and trials; which means that he lived in the time
frame of when the book of John was

The Crucifixion In Mel Gibson's Film The Passion Of Christ
Mel Gibson's movie, The Passion of Christ, is a film based on the final hours of Jesus' life. After watching the film it can be concluded that there is an
unambiguous portrayal of Jews being responsible for Jesus' death. There is no question throughout the film about who is responsible for the crucifixion
because of the nasty portrayal of the Jewish people and Roman soldiers. At every opportunity, Gibson's reinforces the notion that the Jewish high priest
and the Jewish followers are the ones ultimately responsible for the Crucifixion through the language and wording used and the constant display of
their hatful actions towards Jesus, for those reasons the film is anti–Jewish.
In the interview with Diane Sawyer, Gibson was asked if he was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The bad Jews are the high priests and the other Jews in the mob, clearly yelling hateful slurs at Jesus, however, the good Jews consisted of Mary,
John, the other woman and their followers. Arguable, the groups of good Jews are those who are though as models inChristianity today. The problem
with Gibson use of stereotypes is any viewer who has little to no background in the gospels or understanding of the crucifixion, will see the Jewish
people has completely involved in Jesus' final hours of being tortured and murdered. Also having a negative approach towards the Jewish people in the
film will also push any induvial who already blames the Jews for Jesus' death even further, creating more anti–sematic movements.
In creating the movie Gibson, being a biblical literalist, picked parts from all four gospels, which allowed for more options in shaping the film
because each gospel has a similar but different view. Gibson also used outside research to help the film. By doing so, he over–exaggerated the
anti–Jewish portrayal using material based on the mystical visions of, Anne Catherine Emerson, a nun who is known for being anti–Jewish. The parts
Gibson choose contained anti–Jewish lines, creating an anti–Jewish undertone throughout the

The Master And Margarita By Mikhail Bulgakov
Mikhail Bulgakov's imaginative novel, The Master and Margarita has been considered to be one of the best novels of the twentieth century. The
Master and Margarita has focused on Bulgakov's cosmology and how the events of the novel can be seen as a mirror of his world view. One of the
characters, Ivan Nikolayevich Ponyrev appears in the very first chapter of the novel as a very young, antichristian poet and also in the "Epilogue" as
a wiser historian and philosopher. In terms of Ivan's role, he is a transmitter of the Master's messages and also the elaboration of Bulgakov's vision of
history. (add more details) Ivan Nikolayevich Ponyrev, he is a young poet who writes under the pen name Bezdomny, which means "homeless" in
Russian. He... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Professor Woland is frequently referred to in the novel as a foreigner. When he arrives and begins talking with Berlioz and Ivan about the existence or
nonexistence of God and Jesus, he is actually questioning the official atheism. Their conversation revels Bulgakov's world–view and his cosmological
emphasis. Bulgakov's novel was written in the 1930's, a time of great repression and hardship in the Soviet Union under Stalin. It was written at the
height of Stalin 's reign of terror. The novel reveals the freedom of the spirit in an unfree world. When professor Woland tells Ivan and Berlioz that he
has ability to predict the future, he is questioning that how a dominator controls much of Soviet life. In terms of the structure of The Master and
Margarita, the figure of Ivan has indisputable significance. According to Laura D. Weeks, he points out "he is the character that opens and closes the
novel, the source of at least one of the Pilate chapters, and the only truly sympathetic character consistently tied to the Moscow level of the novel"(2).
The story of Pontius Pilate is told by professor Woland. He declares that he was present for the entire story he has related to Ivan and Berlioz. And he
also predicts that Berlioz will be killed and he will stay in Berlioz's apartment shortly. In "Pursuit," Homeless, Ivan hears the scream of a woman and he
sees the accident. After that, he believes

The Crucifixion Of Jesus Christ
Through Matthew 27:11–66 it is evident that the governor Pontius Pilate plays a crucial role in the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. Scholars throughout
history have provided support to see Pilate as positive, negative, or neutral role in the retelling of the crucifixion. Warren Carter is one of the many
scholars who have taken note of Pilate's role in history and within the source "Pontius Pilate. Portraits of a Roman Governor" Carter argues that Pilate
is a negative character. He goes as far to claim that Pilate was one to actively seek conflict. While Carter argues that Pilate's role is one of negativity, I
would argue, that through a socio–culture view, that Pilate is not a negative figure, but an ambivalent one, due to his lack to enforce. In order to fully
understand the story of the crucifixion it is crucial that we take a step into the story. We should view it as a doorway and it is important that we go
through it in our imagination, in order to actually understand what is happening. We must ask our self what info is needed to make the story authentic?
This is crucial for us to ask so that we can fully dive into the story and truly understand everything it has to teach us.
Stepping into the passage the first verse that reveals Pilate as an ambivalent role is in Matthew 27:14. Pilate was amazed that Jesus didn't defend
himself. He recognized the obvious plot against Jesus and wanted to let him go, but Pilate was under pressure from Rome to keep peace in his territory.

Peace Tree Research Paper
Spilling down a slope overlooking Jerusalem, the Peace Forest symbolizes the unity of Jerusalem after the Six–Day War, harmony between Arab and
Jewish people and the hope for peace in a land birthed and raised in turmoil. Here, the city plants a tree for EVERY child born in Jerusalem.
According to Moshe Rivlin, who served as chairman of the Jewish National Fund (JNF) until his death in 2004, "In most countries people are born to
forests, and forests are given to them by nature. But here in this country, if you see a tree, it was planted by somebody."
Every nation grooms its forests, planting replacement trees, keeping forests in place for environmental and aesthetic reasons, but Israel HAD to plant
trees. We know there were trees in Biblical Israel...When the Queen of Sheba knocked on Solomon's palace door...ostensibly to observe his
wisdom...1st Kings 10:27 notes that silver was as plentiful as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thankfully, today, due to a massive reforestation campaign by the JNF, contemporary Israel boasts no less than 280 forests consisting of 185 million
trees. This dedication to reforesting the Holy Land, even as many predicted failure, has changed the landscape of the country, rolling back the desert in
several areas and significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The Peace Forest project began at the end of the Six–Day War in 1967 and unknown to those who embarked on the task, a marvelous archaeological
discovery waited underneath newly planted trees. Many archaeological discoveries in Israel come from pure chance, someone starts to build a
house, someone plows a field, somebody decides to remodel or workers begin to widen a road....in a forest! During a project to widen a road through
the Peace Forest, workers stumbled across an unusually large burial site which yielded a bone box or

Analysis Of Toni Morrison 's ' Song Of Solomon
In Toni Morrison's award–winning novel "Song of Solomon," she fills the novel with deep symbolism. Macon Dead III, nicknamed "Milkman," is a
symbolic character throughout the novel. Not only is he as a character symbolic, but his name is as well. Milkman's aunt, Pilate, has a significant
and symbolic role in the novel. To her father, she represents the child who killed her own mother and took away his wife. In the Bible, Pontius
Pilate is the Roman who is responsible for the execution of Jesus. With that information, one can say that the name Pilate seems to coincide with
her father, Macon Dead's, opinion on what Pilate represents. What's ironic is that Pilate is a good person and is murdered in the end, just as Jesus
was by Pontius Pilate. Guitar, Milkman's best friend, is another significant character in the novel who portrays deep symbolism. Guitar is named
after something that he wanted very badly as a child. "I saw it when my mother took me downtown with her. I was just a baby. It was one of those
things where you guess how many beans in the glass jar and you win a guitar. I cried for it, they said. And always asked about it." This unreachable
goal describes his character throughout the novel. He is never able to overcome the obstacles that stand

Essay on The Master and Margarita: A story within a story
Lu Htet
English 1B
Professor Compean
March 22, 2014.
The Master and Margarita: A Novel Within A Novel The Master and Margarita is written by Mikhail Bulgakov. Bulgakov is one of the most well
known Russian writers of the 20th century, and he is also noted for the rejection of the principles of the officially accepted literary method. "Bulgakov
considered the writer's freedom to be more important than the goals of the Soviet government and was true to himself and his ideals in creating his
literary works" (Yurkchenko 2). The Master and Margarita is a proof of Bulgakov's rejection of the principles of the officially accepted literary
method. In The Master and Margarita, Bulgakov vividly portrays the true life of Moscow under the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His inability to temper justice with mercy led him to cruelty. Another feature that is presented in the novel is the atmosphere of fear in which
people live. In his thesis, "Bulgakov's Novel The Master and Margarita and The Subversion of Socialist Realism", Anastasia Yurchenko explores
how Bulgakov's novel subverts the main ideas of Socialist Realism. The thesis is divided into four chapters. In the fourth chapter, Yurchenko
analyzes to what extent The Master and Margarita overturns the conventions of Socials Realism, and he argues that "in the novel, people's feeling
of horror leads many of them to a disease or persecution mania, since anyone can be arrested" (41). The sense of fear of the secret police is shown
by the Master, when he says "fifteen minutes after she left, someone knocked at my window" ( Bulgakov 166). Bulgakov writes "the sick man was
evidently greatly agitated by the things he was relating to Ivan in whispers. Fear and rage swam and tossed in his eyes"(166). From the Master's
face and his reaction, we are aware of how people live in the atmosphere of fear. A parallel can be drawn between people living in fear in contemporary
Moscow and the meeting of Pontius Pilate with Aphranius in ancient Jerusalem. Mikhail Kreps, claims that "the entire conversation between Pontius
Pilate and the head of the secret service is based on delicate hints which

Social Control through Works of Fiction
Vampire stories have universal themes that provide the backbone for every dark tale. The unholy essence that any vampire story provides sets the
stage for the message that the Church is the way of life and will save you from creatures of evil. From in class readings, we can see all the major
religious themes of the classic vampire story. The common religious theme is the abscess of light is the absence of holiness and is the path to eternal
damnation. Darkness is the prime universal fear of humanity mostly because we, as a species, are not nocturnal creatures; therefore, we have
developed a fear of the predator filled darkness of night. Using figurative descriptions of darkness as the enemy, the Church preaches the way of the
light. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"The cross burned into his flesh like a hot coal. He snatched back his hand but the burning metal clung. He felt the heat of it coursing up his arm, and
hurled it savagely across the room" (Miller). This burning sensation that the cross gives vampires is the Churches connection and reminder that
someone or something that does not follow the way of the cross will be burned eternally in Hell. Vampire protection is the Church's way of creating
fear that will ultimately lead to the fearful turning back to the Church for protection and guidance. With the turn of sexual culture in the Victorian Era,
Church leaders needed to establish a way to regain a tight grip on society as a whole.
Comparable themes in vampire stories and Biblical stories are evident within the class readings. The story of "Shambleau" by Catherine L. Moore
begins with a mob on the hunt for a creature by the name of Shambleau, only to be confronted by a man by the name of Northwest Smith who is
opposed to giving Shambleau up to the crowd. This confrontation of an angry crowd show striking resemblance to the story of Jesus Christ and Pontius
Pilate whereas an angry mob demanded the governor Pontius Pilate to give up Jesus to be crucified just as the angry mob in "Shambleau" wanted
Shambleau to be given up to the crowd. "He let loose a deep–throated bellow, "Shambleau!" and lunged forward. Behind him the mob took up the cry
again. "Shambleau! Shambleau! Shambleau!" and surged after"

Matthew's Portrayal Of Pilate
When you think of the passion narrative, often times one of the first characters that comes to mind is Pontius Pilate. Was he as man with good
intentions, but corrupted by his position of power, or was he a man who was malicious and sought to destroy Jesus. Callie Callon, a professor in the
school of theology at the University of Toronto, wrote an article titled "Pilate the Villain: An Alternative Reading of Matthew's Portrayal of Pilate".
This article argued that Matthew's depiction of Pilate places him in the position of a villain in the passion story. She uses Biblical and historical
information to support her claim. In this paper, I argue that Pontius Pilate was a leader who had good intentions and did not want to follow through with
For instance, I think that she would argue that Pilate was more concerned with pleasing the crowd than with saving Jesus. I do think that there is
some truth to this statement, but I that Pilate tries his best to maneuver around the crowd by offering Jesus up against a criminal and by not taking
part in the crucifixion. I think based on his place in the government he is stuck having to appeal to the crowd's wishes because he is clearly
outnumbered. I feel like it is a difficult position to place all the blame on Pilate, but I do not think he is totally innocent in this case. He could have
used his political power and overruled the crowd, possibly, but I think he was worried how that would affect his position. Yes this is selfish
motivation, but we do live in a selfish and fallen world and what would you do if you were in his position? I think that there definitely is a counter
argument to be made here, but I do not think I would totally agree with Callie Callon by saying that Pontius Pilate is Villain, just based on the biblical
evidence provided in

Five Characteristics Of A Civilization
What is a Civilization; Final Essay Civilization. What exactly is a civilization? Well, I know one thing that we can agree on; A civilization is
made up of five characteristics. Those five characteristics include Complex Institutions, Advanced Cities, Record Keeping, Advanced Technology,
and Specialized workers. Due to those five characteristics, a civilization is a place of safety for a certain religious or ethnic group of people. Not
only is it usually safe because of those five characteristics, it is also a secure living area with its own form of government. Why do so many of us
believe this? Take a look around. There are many places and were many places that, for the most part, stuck together with a singular ethnicity orreligion
. Within the next few paragraphs, I am going to explicate how certain civilizations, or how civilizations in general, are impacted in growth and
development by geography, how the human rights are defined in certain civilizations, and what the effects of human interaction over time both
positively and negatively affect a civilization. The geography within an area impacts both the development and growth of a civilization positively and
negatively. For example, there is the Nile, in Egypt. "When the Nile's floodwaters were just a few feet lower than normal, the amount of fresh silt was
greatly reduced. Thousands of people starved." (Africa packet, pg. 36) As the text states, thousands of people died due to the surrounding geography.
This;

Analysis Of Toni Morrison 's ' Song Of Solomon '
Victoria Sirianni Ms. Thompson AP ELA 4 21 July 2015 Song of Solomon Producing the plot with a vivid image and motive allowed Toni Morrison
to incorporate numerous literary works to enhance the allusions in the story. These specific allusions gave readers a more accurate understanding of
certain aspects of the book. As well as this, readers are capable of searching beyond just the surface of what the words say. The common use of
biblical references and myths, as well as other notations, provide a more in–depth and detailed analyzation throughout the entire novel. To start off,
Song of Solomon 's title relates to the biblical book of the same name. This emphasizes that the novel addresses more of an old–aged theme. The
bible–based book focuses on a conversation between two lovers and Toni 's novel is a celebration of the success of earthly love. Morrison also gives
her characters biblical names in order to match them with the well–known figures. These characters not only obtain their original history, but the
history that their name carries in the Bible, as well. For example, the biblical character, Hagar, is Sarah's handmaiden, who bears Sarah's husband a
son and is then banished from his sight. Similar to the previous one mentioned, Morrison's character is often used by Milkman. He takes advantage of
everything she has to offer and uses it for his own selfish benefits. He seems to regret

Beware of the Black Magic, it leads to Double Meanings Mikhail Bulgakov's work of art novel, The Master and Margarita, has influenced many
people to create some kind of spin off of it, whether it be a song, painting, or even a movie, it is always entertaining. Speaking about movies, to this
day there are more than thirteen films made of or based on The Master and Margarita from countries all over the world, such as Italy and France. Not
only are there movies but soap operas aired on TV have also been based off of Bulgakov's novel. The book is so intriguing that directors and film
makers want to put a face to the characters. The Master and Margarita is split between two separate parts, Book One and Book Two. Book One
starts off in Moscow on a normal night where we are introduced to Mikhail Alexandrovich Berlioz, the editor and chairman for the Moscow literary
associations, and Ivan Nikolaevic Ponyrev, a poet who goes by the name of Homeless. On this particular evening Homeless was told by Berlioz his
writing about Jesus was not acceptable since religion was non–existent in Russia. This leads to a strange man appearing by the name of Professor
Woland. With the appearance of this strange character he confronts the men and says God exists. From this point we are taken into Jerusalem by a
story from Woland and learn about the story of Pontius Pilate and Yesha Ha–Nozri. From this point on the men are skeptical by this foreign Professor
until Woland claims to know everything

The novel The Master and Margarita is set during the Stalin period in the Soviet Union, but was written about ten years after the Stalin period by
Mikhail Bulgakov. The story of the Master runs alongside with the story of Pontius Pilate being told to Berlioz and Ivan or Homeless by Woland.
Throughout the novel Bulgakov refers to Pontius Pilate and speaks about him in an atypical way from what we previously know about Pontius Pilate.
The story of Pilate in The Master and Margarita is different than the Role that Pontius Pilate plays in the Bible. As discussed in class, Bulgakov uses
this character that is already familiar to us and changes his narrative to something unfamiliar to society. Bulgakov is defamiliarizing his reader to various
Any of his readers with a background in Christianity would know the story from the Bible of Pontius Pilate. Bulgakov chooses to use the character
of Pilate from the Bible, but change some things about him so that the reader is now unfamiliar with the character they would usually be familiar
with...Pilate. In the novel readers can describe Pontius Pilate as a ruler, decision maker, lonely, remorseful, and torn. Some would see him as a
monster. However, you cannot totally write Pilate off as a beast because while he did make some regretful decisions he wanted to do the right thing.
He knew Yeshua Ha–Nozri should not be condemned, he did not want to condemn him even before they had formed a relationship, but he knew he
had no other option because of the rules of the society during that time. He was pushed into doing something he knew to be wrong because of his
position as a leader or decision maker during the time in the novel when Woland is discussing him. The decisions that Pontius Pilate was compelled to
make to save his own skin is a reflection of the influence the systems had on the rulers in the book. Bulgakov also focused on defamiliarizing Yeshua
Ha–Nozri. He was a character in the book that the reader would attach to Christ in the Bible, but is also not exactly the same. An interesting detail that
is different between Pilate and Yeshua in Bulgakov's novel is that in The Master and Margarita, Bulgakov kept Pontius

Property Laws Essay
http://www.thebluediamondgallery.com/tablet/images/claim.jpg We're all here on this earth using what we have. We've been taught that things we
are given are ours solely to use for our own personal use and so we identify that with ownership. For instance when you're born there is a piece of
paper created and somewhere along the way someone hands it to you and you believe that's yours. You're told what your name is. It's that is also
yours but the thing about it is its intellectual property. It's owned by someone else. Under use of property laws everything created is owned by
someone else. https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3363/3311100676_b996889884_z.jpg?zz=1 To put it a simpler way, I have nothing to do with anything
that's out there at all... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
https://media.defense.gov/2016/Aug/08/2001598245/670/394/0/160805–F–DL164–001.JPG Here's the key the world is under martial law. It has
already happened and it's over with, at least since World War One. Here in the USA we were the model for the New World Order of martial law.
When we had Civil War the Lieber code was enacted. It's the law that the military has to follow. Within that code there's an article that says during war
times the soldiers will protect the peaceful inhabitants. This code was reenacted under the League of Nations renamed The Hague Convention. The
same rules still apply today. The peaceful inhabitants are non combatative users of property. In 1933 with the creation of the birth certificate and the
Social Security number no one ever had to charge anyone else for anything else ever again. No one is liable. https://image.slidesharecdn.com
/lightandshadowcourtsandcountycourtsdistrictsa–140811123049–phpapp02/95
/light–and–shadow–courts–and–county–courts–districts–84–638.jpg?cb=1407760438 Source: https://www.slideshare.net/uniquelee
/light–and–shadow–courts–and–county–courts–districts It's called social insurance. The reason this was done is we were at that time using gold and
silver. People were accountable and things before. The Social Security and the birth certificate and that was damaging our brothers and sisters. We were
accusing our brothers and sisters and creating more harm than

The Story Of Pontius Pilate By Paul Maier
There are two sides to every story, and sometimes we forget to look at the other side. Before I picked up Pontius Pilate by Paul L. Maier, I can
honestly say I didn't care so much for Pilate. All I remember based on what I was taught was that Pilate didn't want Christ's blood on his hands, so he
took the easy way out. As sad as it was, that was my only extensive knowledge about who Pilot was, and how he untimely got to that decision to wash
his hands clean of the situation. Paul Maier did a fantastic job with helping me understand what living life back in the New Testament would look like.
Though the thought of marrying a 15–year–old daughter to a 30–year–old man in today's society seems crazy, Procula was actually considered to be
almost... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
What I realized is that Pilot is human, and is lost. Without the Holy Spirit or any belief in God whatsoever, Pilot is choosing what is right and wrong
strictly on the laws that he is given. Before I thought that Pilot was just a Roman Ruler out to get Jesus– scared of his power. Now I understand that
Pilot did what was right for Pilot. Pilot didn't really seem to have a choice but to Crucify Jesus, even if he didn't want to. Pilot made an agreement
that he would release one prisoner chosen by the people at Passover– and the people traded in Jesus for Barabbas. Everything that I read about Pilot in
this book proved him to be a man of his word, and someone who favored the law and his people– there was no way that he could go back on it. Do I
think Pilot ever regretted what he did? Yes. Do I think he would go back and change what he had done? I'm not sure. If Pilot set Jesus free, where
would Christianity be today? History it self would have been changed forever. While it seemed to be a minimal task for Pilot to do to keep his
constituents happy, it actually is one of the biggest decisions a human on earth has ever made. It might sound sacrilegious to say this, but I'm Glad that
Pilot sentenced Jesus to die– because in that the whole human race gained eternal

Essay on CamusвЂ™ The Stranger (The Outsider): Meursault...
Meursault as Christ in The Stranger (The Outsider)
In one of his later interviews, Camus made the somewhat irritated comment that Meursault is the "only Christ we deserve." While this seem to be a
pithy, witty comment, we need to figure out how Meursault is like Christ. Christ taught his disciples and had them go and teach others, yet Meursault
has no disciples and chooses to say little. Meursault murders while Christ brings a man back from the dead. Most drastically, Christ "died for our
sins" in order to make all those who follow free from original sin. Meursault just dies.
So it is hard to see the link. If, however, we are to take Camus seriously, we need to push hard on this comparison. Christ lived his life... Show more
For Meursault, his death comes randomly.
When the penultimate moment comes, and both men are asked by their judges to say something on their own behalf. Both men refuse. Pontius Pilate
puts the question to Jesus, trying to get him to say anything to save himself. Through it all, Jesus keeps his mouth shut and insures his crucifixion. This
silence is unusual for Jesus; he starts talking as an infant, teaching the teachers and keeps rapping for his entire life. His eloquent silence in the end
tells more about his desire for death than anything he could say. Meursault's moment comes at the end of his trial, when the judge asks if he has
anything to say. Faced with the guillotine at the end of a sham trial, Meursault could have railed at the system or begged for forgiveness. Instead he
chooses to say nothing. Saying anything at that point would have been banal; there was nothing relevant he could say. Nothing would change his fate.
So that is what he chose to say. Christ chooses silence for his eloquence, using his silence to choose his death. Meursault chooses silence because there
is nothing for him to say.
The ultimate difference between the two is illustrated by their respective deaths. In dying, Christ alleviates the entire population of the earth and the
populations to come of sin. As a result of his death, everyone has a shot at heaven. On the other hand, Meursault's death is a repudiation of the afterlife.
Before his

Exploring Deeper Into The Life Of Pontius Pilate
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION OF PONTIUS PILATE
PONTIUS PILATE'S CULT ASSOCIATION
ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF PONTIUS PILATE
WEAKNESSES OF PONTIUS PILATE
STRENGHTHS OF PONTIUS PILATE
SCHOLARLY VERDICTS OF PILATE
LESSONS FOR LIFE
DEATH OF PONTIUS PILATE
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
This paper will explore deeper into the life of Pontius Pilate and examine his weaknesses, strengths, and accomplishments.
INTRODUCTION OF PONTIUS PILATE
Pontius Pilate served as the prefect of Judaea from 26 to 36 A.D. his exact birth is not known, neither is it known what he looked like. However, his
reign correspond with the time that John the Baptist and Jesus were active.
POINTIUS PILATES CULT ASSOCIATION
1.Coinage:
2.Pilate's Inscription:
3.Shields:
ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF PONTIUS PILATE
Pilate had deliberately and strategically kept Joseph Caiaphas on his team due to the fact that he knew how to get along with the Roman overseer.
Pilate chief responsibility as governor was the Judaea military which reveals their agenda to retain particular territories and bring the people of it firmly
under the Roman control. Other roles included:
1.Collection of Taxes: (Acts 5:37 Luke 2:2)

2.Overseer of the Building Projects:
3.Maintaining Law and Order– Pilate had the supreme judicial authority within his province
PONTIUS PILATE' ASSOCIATION WITH HEROD
And Herod and Pilate became friends with each other that very day, for before this they had been at enmity with each other. (Luke 23:12)
INCIDENTS

Pontius Pilate As A Neutral Figure
Many critics argue that Pontius Pilate was either a positive or negative figure; I am going to argue that he was a neutral figure based on his actions in
regards to Jesus's trial, his attempt at getting Jesus released, and his absolution and refusal in regards to the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. Mark Powell
from bibleodyssey.org has a very different stance than I do. He argues that Pilate "condemnedJesus to death and had him tortured and crucified". The
story of Jesus's trial and crucifixion was told in all four of the Gospels and all of the stories vary in some manner. John 18 and 19 as well as Luke 23
show different sides of Pilate and the dilemma he faced with this situation. There is also a historical context that must be taken into consideration to
truly understand Pilate's position with regards to the trial and crucifixion. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The duties that came with this position included everything from collecting taxes to maintaining law and order among the people (Biography.com). In
Matthew 27, Pilate questioned Jesus but did not formally accuse or charge him. Jesus' silence towards the accusations levied against him instead
brought Pilate amazement. In the Gospel of Luke 23:4, 13–15 Pilate finds no guilt in Jesus so he sends him to King Herod. King Herod also finds no
guilt in Jesus so he sends him back to Pilate who once again declares that he "has not found this man guilty of any of your charges against him."
Looking at the multitude of texts surrounding the trial of Jesus Christ, it would seem that Pilate was judging on neutral ground and doing his duty to
the best of his

The Shadow of the Galilean by Gerd Theissen
The Shadow of the Galilean by Gerd Theissen is a fictional narrative about a Jewish merchant, Andreas, searching for information about a group of
people known as Essenes, John the Baptist, and Jesus of Nazareth. While traveling through Jerusalem Andreas was imprisoned by the Romans thinking
he was a part of a demonstration against Polite when his mission was to find Jesus. Andreas writes, "I never met Jesus on my travels through Galilee. I
just found traces of him everywhere: anecdotes and stories, traditions and rumors. But everything that I heard of him fit together. Even quite
exaggerated stories about him had a characteristic stamp" (124).
Beginning (Interrogation)
Andreas, son of John, was in Jerusalem when an outbreak occurred. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Metilius further describes the tribe to Andreas as peaceful and Pilate is interested in them because he wants to know what turned them off of normal
life (29). Andreas looks at this mission as close to impossible because of the stories that he has heard about this tribe and how secret they keep
everything but the officer encourages him to go on and talk to some people around the area thinking they might know something about the tribe.
Andrea's 1st mission
Andreas travels to Essenes with his two slaves that had originally come with him to Jerusalem, who had also been captured. Essenes are a disciple
community who disagree with the temple worship and most of its celebrated festivals. Essenes have gone out into the wilderness because they think
they cannot fulfill God's commandments in everyday life (43). On the journey through the Dead Sea wilderness Andreas and his slaves encounter
Baruch, a banished Essene. Baruch was banished from the community after he had uncovered the community's secret of hidden treasure, which
probably never existed. Andreas saved Baruch by taking him under his wing and made him apart of the family by making him a hired assistant in his
trade. By talking to Baruch, Andreas was able to get enough information for the Romans. Ignoring the Essenes' hatred for Rome and riches, claims of
an end religious war, and prophecy of imminent political change (43–44).

Outline on Pontius Pilate Essay
Study One Outline
Over the next three weeks we will look into a few aspects of Pilate's life. This week we will be looking at the area under Pilates command, and what
Role pilate played in the government in Judea. Then over the next couple of weeks we will look into the life of Pilate, and then the important role he
played into the death of Jesus, and how it played into the Passover.
Introduction to Pontius Pilate
5th Governor
Roman – Appointed by Rome and was not Jewish
Valerius– Pilate succeeded him in his reign.
Not much in the bible about him, so one must look at historical sources
Josephus. A Jewish historian
Other historians at the time.
Thesis: The study we are about to embark on will attempt to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ordered soldiers to blend in
When tensions rose, they took out weapons, and many died
there was a false prophet in Samaria was to show the sacred vessels that were supposedly to have been buried by Moses on Mt. Gerizim

Soldiers blocked the way, and a fight ensued
Prisoners were taken by Pilate and later executed
Due to amount of deaths Samaritan leaders went to Syria and complained.
This lead to the dismissal of Pilate.
Tradition has it that Pilate later commits suicide in disgrace
Pilate's life as a whole may be a mystery to many, but as seen today there are historical writings that help us understand who Pilate was. Also seen
today was the rocky relationship between the Jews and Pilate. This gives un an interesting insight into the crucifixion. We know Pilate tried to
please the Jews, and we know that the religious leaders were not fond of him. Next week we will take a look at the crucifixion, and the trial of Jesus.
As noted earlier Pilate played a role in this, but how does his role compare to Passover? Next week we will look into that, and I will show that Pilate's
role is an important one.
Bibliography
Bond, H.K. `The Coins of Pontius Pilate: Part of an Attempt to Provoke the People or to Integrate them into the Empire?', United Kingdom. Journal for
the Study of Jerusalem 1996.
Bond, H.K.. Caiaphas: friend of Rome and judge of Jesus? Louisville, KY: Westminster John
Knox Press, 2004.
Josephus,

The Crucible Summary Chapter 6
During this unit, Pontius Pilate questions Jesus as the final decision–maker in this trial. In verse 11 he asks "Are you the king of the Jews?" in which
Jesus replied "You have said so." Pilate continues the interrogation after the elders and the high priest have concluded their testimonies againstJesus. An
element of irony is introduced as Pilate is amazed that Jesus made no rebuttal against such claims. Pontius Pilate probes further in verse 13 and asks
"Don't you hear the testimony they are bringing against you?" Ironically, Jesus gave no response. Why was Jesus remaining silent? Possibly, due to the
crowd's obvious people power there was no response that would have satisfied the hostile climate. Furthermore, Jesus predicted his death many ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He could have release whomever he saw fit. The power is not completely given away at the point. In verse 20 the elders and high priest recognize
the opportunity to monopolize the weakness of the governor and "...the chief priests and the elders persuaded the crowd to ask for Barabbas and
to have Jesus executed" in verse 20. Pontius Pilate response by repeating the same question in verse 17 now again in verse 21 ""Which of the two
do you want me to release to you?" Once the crowd had demanded the release of Barabbas, Pontius Pilate gives the remaining power left to the
crowd when he ask "What shall I do, then, with Jesus who is called the Messiah?" in verse 22. The crowd responds "Crucify Him" now obtaining the
needed power of the governor. At this point, the governor has completely lost his authority and his weakness is shown in verse 23 where he questions
the crowd and does not get a response to the prosed question. Instead the crowd neglects the question all together and demands for Jesus to be
crucified. In verse 23 "Why? What crime has he committed?" asked Pilate. But they shouted all the louder, "Crucify

Disparity Between The Passion Of The Christ by Mel Gibson...
"The Passion of the Christ" by Mel Gibson, recounts the last twelve hours of the life of Jesus of Nazareth, portraying his arrest, trial, crucifixion and
death. One of the most popular religious movies in modern times, it therefore becomes susceptible to criticism. Although the film is based upon the
stories within the four gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, there are many exaggerations and non–biblical elements present in the movie. This is
not unexpected, since it is a movie, but the vivid detail of the brutality in the movie as well as the Anti–Semitic theme are the most publicly criticized
elements of the movie. The Passion emphasizes the brutality Jesus endured to give himself for his people, but at the same time in ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
After re–reading some of the gospels, it doesn't explain or declare that he was shy about his beliefs. In the scenes of the movie, he is preaching his
peace and ideas of independence, but the high priests and the Jewish people do not show him any mercy or respect. Even at the voice of the governor
Pontius Pilate, who several times mentions that he doesn't find any guilt or reason to persecute Jesus, the people still wish for his crucifixion. The
movie did not really make sense of the motivation of the Jewish high priests or the Jewish people, and it was not explained in the gospels either.
However, in Mark 15; 10–11, it suggests that Pontius Pilate "realized that it was out of jealousy that the chief priests had handed Jesus over. The
chief priests, however, had incited the crowd to demand that he should release Barabbas for them instead". Therefore, according to the Bible, the
chief priests were envious of Jesus, and that is why they condemned him to be crucified. It was an act of panic more than anything else. The people,
fearing to be considered outcasts, therefore agreed with whatever the high priests would say. This still does not explain why the Jewish people were
so quick to have their savior and messiah killed. The movie suggests that they all felt passionately about this themselves, because all the people in the
scenes are

Jesus Is The Christ Of Jesus
We as Christians know that Jesus is the Messiah. Jesus was born in Bethlehem during the reign of Herod the Great, around 4 to 6 B.C. At the age of
30, he was baptized by John the Baptist in the Jordan River. After this he began his ministry teaching about the kingdom of God and preforming
miracles. His life in recorded in the New Testament part of the bible and many movies have been made about him, such as the 1977 classic, Jesus of
Nazareth. In this movie, Jesus performs many miracles including raising people from the dead. His actions show us how God treats people and
how he should be treated. Jesus resurrected Lazarus from the dead because Lazarus and his family had a strong faith in God. After this Lazarus
became one of Jesus' closest friends. His faith resurrected him, Jesus was just the catalyst. Jesus declared that the people who believed in him will
die, yet they will live. What I believe this means is that although people will physically die in this life, they will continue to live with God forever in
Heaven. When Jesus came to the temple, he lost his temper and destroyed the market shops. He claimed that the temple was God's house and it should
not be corrupted with buying and gambling. It was a holy place and yet the people thought nothing about defiling it. When the woman who was caught
committing adultery was about to be stoned, Jesus said to the men chasing her, "the one who hasn't sinned shall throw the first stone." No one dared
cast the first stone

Pontius Pilate : Evil-Doed In The Book Of Jesus
Pontius Pilate, a high–ranked official in Judaea, is who many blame for the death of Jesus. In the book of Matthew, he is the one who judges Jesus in
his trial for His claim to be the king, which conflicted with the Roman rule. This has made him a very controversial character in the Bible, and there
have been many depictions of Pilate throughout history. Many proclaim him to be "good", "bad", or somewhere in between. AlthoughPontius Pilate has
been described as an evil–doer due to the fact he sentenced Jesus to death, it is evident through his actions and surrounding context that he was
neutral in the situation. In the book of Matthew, Jesus' story of his crucifixion plays out. His case is brought before Pontius Pilate who rules in
Judaea as a judge. Usually at these events "the governor was accustomed to release a prisoner for the crowd, anyone whom they wanted" (Matthew
27:15). The crowd has two choices: Jesus, someone who had had a history of healing and teaching or Barabbas, a convicted murderer and rebel;
they choose Barabbas. Pilate wonders why the crowd wants Jesus to be killed so badly. Although Pilate tries to challenge them, they start to riot.
He then washes his hands and proclaims to the crowd that he is "innocent of this man's blood" (Matthew 27:24), sentencing Jesus to be crucified
and Barabbas to be released. One could say that Pilate happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time because the purpose of God was to
have Jesus come to this earth and be crucified. Jesus came to the earth to die for the sins of mankind as it was said in Luke 24:26, "was it not
necessary that the Messiah should suffer these things and then enter into his glory?". No matter what he chose, Jesus would be crucified
regardless. Pilate was simply an avenue for God's will to be fulfilled through Jesus and his death, and one cannot say someone is evil for fulfilling
the will of God. From a historical perspective, back in the time of Jesus' crucifixion, the Roman Empire was run completely differently than would
be today. Pilate's job as a government official was to run trials and decide who will be killed, and who would be spared. On the day of Jesus'
crucifixion, Pilate had to pick someone to let free, and

A Narrative Criticism Of The Political Ideological Lens
The second criticism I enjoyed was looking at the political ideological lens. Also, having a BS in Political Science with minors in International
relations and Pre–Law, this criticism fully caught my attention. This lens focuses on the resistance of Jesus in his time to motivate Christians today to
stand against institutionalized power that often disenfranchises and demeans the opportunity to obtain the American dream. When viewing the New
Testament, we must be honest in evaluating the aspects that do not contribute to public health. The issue of poverty and political culture as it relates to
the condition of the oppressed is always front and center. My first paper even though a narrative criticism paper focused on the need for political
expediency over the true application of justice. This was demonstrated in Matthew 27: 11–26, where Jesus is brought before Pontius Pilate. The purpose
of this unit was to illuminate the affair between politics and justice. The charge the high priests brought against Jesus before Pontius Pilate displays that
political expediency takes precedence over justice. This unit is less about Jesus, partly due to his refusal to respond, and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I believe that it is important to point out text like Matthew 4:3–11 that provides a new perspective that takes an emancipatory and inclusive approach to
mental illness issues. I want to create a safe space that affirms that Jesus understands the particularities of all experiences, especially those considered
the furthest away. In my home church, I would the bishop say that no matter how much sin one committed they could always come back to Christ and
change their life. However, people who struggle with mental illness are not given that grace and opportunity to come to Jesus. They are often sat on
the sidelines and ignored as if they are the modern

The Trial of Jesus Essay
In The Judaeo–Christian Tradition by Jack H. Hexter, the trial of Jesus is addressed in an unorthodox perspective. The trial of Jesus incorporates two
trials: the Roman trial and the Jewish trial. In Hexter's book the Roman trial is addressed in great length while the Jewish trial is almost unaddressed.
Hexter provides a perspective of the trial of Jesus with only one cause: the charge of sedition, for claiming to be king of the Jews. By using the four
gospel texts, Hexter's view is illuminated and we find crucial aspects to the trial that not only counter Hexter's view on the sedition charge but also
provide evidence for other important charges. Themes other than the charge of sedition supporting Hexter's perspective include, the ... Show more
Hexter blames Pilate for being the sole decision–maker for the death of Jesus, but once again, the Four Gospel texts allude the Jewish community for
being a major influence upon the death of Jesus. Hexter begins his thesis with one sentence stating that only Pilate gave the order of Jesus' death:
"...who in turn gave him to the procurator Pontius Pilate for trial." (Hexter 63) Hexter does not address the Jewish community that is in upheaval
during a time of Passover or Pilates role throughout the trial. Pontius Pilate, as Roman Governor, had a position to fulfill to the Roman population
along with the Jewish community. During a time of Jewish Passover, along with the chaos Jesus had created, Pilate was under great influence from
many outside factors. "The stir created by Jesus' preaching and the size of his following perturbed both the Roman and the Jewish authorities, fearful
of any wind that might fan the smoldering discontent in Palestine into a raging flame of revolt." (Hexter 62) In the Roman trial, Pilate was chosen to
judge Jesus on the act of sedition, however counter to Hexter's perspective, repeatedly stated that he saw no case against him. In the Gospel of John, it is
apparent that Pilate not only doesn't want to be involved but is puzzled at the situation at hand. "Your own nation and the chief of priests have handed
you over to me; what have you done?" (John 18:33) Pilate is attempting to keep order in his city and rather not involve

Billy Budd Essay
Billy Budd
By: Herman Mellville
Herman Melville&#8217;s Billy Budd is a classic tale of innocence and evil. The main force of innocence is constantly attacked by the force of
evil until the innocence falters. Through the use of many literary devices, Melville shows how sometimes the obvious results do not always occur
when they are being expected. However, he also shows that the force of all that is good and righteous will triumph over evil at the end, even over death.
The protagonist, Billy Budd, is the major force of innocence in the book. Billy is a young man who seems to have everything going for him. He is big,
strong, handsome, and he has a personality that draws ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He became so enraged that all he could do was stutter. Since he was not able to speak, his only defense was to strike Claggart as hard as he could. The
blow to his head killed him as he hit the ground.
Captain Vere knew that Billy did not mean for him to die but he still calls a trial for murder. Captain Vere knew that Billy was not going to revolt as
well but because of the mutinies that had been taking place at that time, Vere did not want to show any weakness. Billy could have probably gotten
off had he turned in the other men who were actually planning to revolt but he didn&#8217;t because of his loyalty to his crew. He lost the trial
and was hanged, his last words being, &#8220;God Bless Captain Vere!';
The use of symbols heavily influences the book. Most of the symbols are religious ones because of Melville&#8217;s belief at the time. The most
compelling symbol is that of Billy being compared to Jesus. Like Jesus he is viewed as pure and innocent and having no real character flaws. He
always tries to do the right thing and stay out of everyone&#8217;s way. Claggart would be compared to the Pharisees that Jesus had to deal
with. His whole purpose is to cause the downfall of Billy and he succeeds. Billy also is a symbol of Jesus while he is at trial. While Jesus is on trial he
says nothing in his defense that could facilitate his release. Neither

Master And Margarita Good Vs Evil Essay
What is Good If There is No Evil?
This satire involves the devil, a psych ward, and love. Although this story is fictional, it allegorises historical events. The Master and Margarita was
written in the time of Stalinism. Mikhail Bulgakov, the author, used a lot of symbolism and magical realism to write about the environment he was in
without being forthright about it. He used polarities, such as good vs evil and rational vs irrational, to get his point across to readers. The theme of The
Master and Margarita is that there is always good in evil and evil in good. The motifs that Mikhail Bulgakov displayed throughout The Master and
Margarita are the disguises of the devil and the behavior of nature.
One motif that led to the realization of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This story symbolizes a lot of philosophical and religious issues that Bulgakov witnessed while writing the book. The disguises of Satan symbolize
Stalin and the people who were with him during the Stalinist revolution. The religious polarities of the two settings in the book symbolized how
religiously different Moscow was from a city that is known to be very religious. There are many more hidden symbols and meanings in this book.
This book is a classic because it has such a deep meaning that is often

Pontius Pilate As A Negative Figure In The Bible
Pontius Pilate as a Negative Figure in the Bible
The Bible has been a well–known text that many people have based their religion off of and use to guide them through their life. The interpretation
may be different depending on who wrote the chapter, when the story was written, and depending on the person who is reading the story. All of these
factors contribute to how we read the Bible. Contingent on the context of the situation, Pilate may be portrayed as a negative, neutral, or positive figure
in the Bible. Warren Carter's book,Pontius Pilate: Portraits of a Roman Governor, states," But in addition to exonerating him from any blame, this
verdict claims that during Jesus' trial Pilate recognizes Jesus' special identity and so becomes a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Bible states, "For he realized that it was out of jealousy that they had handed him over" (Matt 27:18). Pilate knew that the leaders of Jerusalem
wanted Jesus murdered because it was out of jealousy. If Pilate knew that he was innocent from the start, why did he allow the crowd to overtake
his power and condemn him for being the Son of God? Jesus was seen as a threat to the leaders of Jerusalem, so the leaders wanted him killed. Pilate
ultimately had the power to determine who was to be punished, his hand was not forced to condemn Jesus. Yet, he still allowed Jesus to be crucified
in Pilate's reign as governor.
Like many people, Pilate fell to peer pressure. Pilate was aware of the fact that Jesus was innocent but still allowed him to be punished. He asked
the crowd why they wanted Jesus to be crucified in hopes that they possibly would change their mind. The Bible states, "Then he asked, 'Why,
what evil has he done?' But they shouted all the more, 'Let him be crucified' (Matt 27:23). Pilate knew he was in the wrong because Jesus was
innocent, yet he still allows him to be crucified. Pilate should have put his foot down because he was aware that Jesus did not commit a crime. The
Bible also says, "While he was sitting on the judgment seat, his wife sent a word to him, 'Have nothing to do with that innocent man, for today I have
suffered a great deal because of a dream about him'" (Matt. 27:19). His wife specifically told him not to harm Jesus. She had a

Eve's Apology In Defense Of Women By Salve Deus Rex Juadeorum
In "Eve's Apology in Defense of Women," an excerpt from Salve Deus Rex Juadeorum, Aemilia Lanyer uses biblical illusions such as the story of Eve
eating the forbidden fruit, as well as satirical diction to convey a message of unjust attitudes toward the female gender. These attitudes express an
imbalanced judgement of women in religious settings, a notion that would continue to be used not only when alluding to religion, but also in other
everyday life events. Lanyer, however, uses this satirical language to argue that Eve is only to blame as much as the male characters in the story, Adam
and Satan. Since being written in 1611, Salve Deus Rex Juadeorum has interested readers of all kinds due to its incredible use of feminist diction in
several different poems and paragraphs, all of which are written by a young female author, Aemilia Lanyer. According to Subjectivity and Women's
Poetry in Early Modern England by Lynette McGrath, Lanyer was trying to sway aristocratic dedicatees into a benevolent membership in a women's
community by "poetically invoking the attractive and idealized discourses of maternity, religion and women's nurturing love for each other" (page
211). In "Eve's Apology in Defense of Women" the reader can recognize this heavy use of religious context to persuade her audience to grasp this idea
of building a women's community via the unjust treatment reserved in the very first book of Genesis. The first line of the poem, which reads "Now
Pontius Pilate is to

Essay On Blending Good And Evil In The Master And Margarita

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Essay On Blending Good And Evil In The Master And Margarita