övervakning och Integritet
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•631 views
lecture 2 on the techrisk course
![Övervakning och integritet Mathias Klang [email_address]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/vervakningochintegritet-090908114143-phpapp01/85/overvakning-och-Integritet-1-320.jpg)
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to övervakning och Integritet
Similar to övervakning och Integritet (20)
More from Mathias Klang
More from Mathias Klang (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
övervakning och Integritet
- 1. Övervakning och integritet Mathias Klang [email_address]
- 2. Indelning
- 4. ANSTÄLLDA ÖVERVAKAS AV GPS
- 6. BARN
- 8. Child Locator GPS Watch
- 10. SMARTA & DOLDA LEKSAKER
- 11. Shower AM-FM Mirror Radio
- 12. AM/FM Clock radio wireless hidden camera
- 19. BAKGRUND
- 30. Paparazzi (1898)
- 34. Regleringsförsök
- 37. REGLERINGSFÖRSÖK
- 42. MEN…
Editor's Notes
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se ctrl frk 2 by kreep cc by nc sa
- What are you looking at? by Enjoy Surveillance cc by nc sa Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- GPS by orangejack cc by nc sa GPS-övervakning av anställda vanligare SVD 2008 http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/artikel_1553599.svd Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- http://www.datainspektionen.se/press/nyhetsarkiv/2008/inte-tillatet-att-kontrollera-arbetstider-med-gps/ http://www.datainspektionen.se/Documents/beslut/2008-03-03-GPS-kontroll.pdf Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- running after pigeons by wrote cc by nc Schoolkid chipping trial 'a success' http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/22/kid_chipping_doncaster_go/ Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- http://www.spyshops.ca/trackerbackpack.htm Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- http://www.brickhousesecurity.com/wf200.html Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- LEGO Gears of War Minifigs by Dunechaser by nc sa Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- http://www.dpl-surveillance-equipment.com/100611.html Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- http://www.dpl-surveillance-equipment.com/1006177.html Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- AIR travellers will be invited to take part in "virtual strip searches" [X-rays] at Australian airports when the Federal Government begins trials of security screening measures this month. The measures include a body scanner [X-rays] that can see what lies under a person's clothes. The Government says the scanner could detect weapons and explosives, but critics say it is an invasion of privacy. "It provides detailed images of a person's body … which many people might find highly embarrassing," said Stephen Blanks, of the NSW Council for Civil Liberties. http://publik18.blogspot.com/2008/10/privacy-health-fears-over-airport-body.html Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Google automatically scans e-mails to add context-sensitive advertisements to them. Privacy advocates raised concerns that the plan involved scanning their personal, assumed private, e-mails, and that this was a security problem. Allowing e-mail content to be read, even by a computer, raises the risk that the expectation of privacy in e-mail will be reduced. Furthermore, e-mail that non-subscribers choose to send to Gmail accounts is scanned by Gmail as well, even though those senders never agreed to Gmail's terms of service or privacy policy. Google can change its privacy policy unilaterally and Google is technically able to cross-reference cookies across its information-rich product line to make dossiers on individuals. However, most e-mail systems make use of server-side content scanning in order to check for spam . [41] [42] Privacy advocates also regard the lack of disclosed data retention and correlation policies as problematic. Google has the ability to combine information contained in a person's e-mail messages with information from Internet searches. Google has not confirmed how long such information is kept or how it can be used. One of the concerns is that it could be of interest to law enforcement agencies. More than 30 privacy and civil liberties organizations have urged Google to suspend Gmail service until these issues are resolved. [43] Gmail's privacy policy contains the clause: "residual copies of deleted messages and accounts may take up to 60 days to be deleted from our active servers and may remain in our offline backup systems". Google points out that Gmail adheres to most industry-wide practices. Google has stated that they will "make reasonable efforts to remove deleted information from our systems as quickly as is practical." [44] [45] Google defends its position by citing their use of email-scanning to the user's benefit. Google states that Gmail refrains from displaying ads next to potentially sensitive messages such as those that mention tragedy, catastrophe, or death. [4 Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Consumer Watchdogs Flog Google's Privacy Policy (2008) http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2008/06/consumer-watchdogs-flog-google.php Google originally placed a cookie on each registered user's computer, which can be used to track that person's search history, and that cookie was not set to expire until 2038 . [12] As of 2007, Google's cookie now expires in two years but renews itself when a Google service is used. [12] There is no evidence that Google turns over information to the FBI or the NSA , though some users remain anxious about the possibility. [12] In response, Google claims cookies are necessary to maintain user preferences between sessions and offer other search features. Other popular search engines, such as Yahoo! Search and Microsoft 's Bing , use cookies with distant expiration dates as well. Privacy International has raised concerns regarding the dangers and privacy implications of having a centrally-located, widely popular data warehouse of millions of Internet users' searches, and how under controversial existing U.S. law, Google can be forced to hand over all such information to the U.S. government [13] . In early 2005, the United States Department of Justice filed a motion in federal court to force Google to comply with a subpoena for, "the text of each search string entered onto Google's search engine over a one-week period (absent any information identifying the person who entered such query)." [14] Google fought the subpoena, due to concerns about users' privacy. [15] In March 2006, the court ruled partially in Google's favor, recognizing the privacy implications of turning over search terms and refusing to grant access. [16] Steve Ballmer [17] , Liz Figueroa [18] , Mark Rasch [19] , and the editors of Google Watch [20] believe the processing of email message content by Google's Gmail service goes beyond proper use. Google claims that mail sent to or from Gmail is never read by a human being beyond the account holder, and is only used to improve relevance of advertisements. [21] Whether Google is the only one doing this or simply the only one who publicly admits it is unknown, since the privacy policies of other popular email services, like Hotmail and Yahoo , allows for collection and utilizing of personal information for ads when using their services, but do not specify precisely what information and which services [22] [23] . Google's online map service, "Street View" has been accused of taking pictures and coming too close inside people's private homes and/or people who walk down the street not knowing they are being watched on Google's service. [24] [25] Aaron and Christine Boring, a Pittsburgh couple, sued Google for "invasion of privacy". They claimed that Street View made a photo of their home available online, and it diminished the value of their house, which was purchased for its privacy. [26] They lost their case in a Pennsylvania court. "While it is easy to imagine that many whose property appears on Google's virtual maps resent the privacy implications, it is hard to believe that any – other than the most exquisitely sensitive – would suffer shame or humiliation," Judge Hay ruled. [27] In its 2007 Consultation Report, Privacy International ranked Google as "Hostile to Privacy", its lowest rating on their report, making Google the only company in the list to receive that ranking. [28] [29] Carl Hewitt noted that intimate personal information is a "toxic asset" in Google datacenters because it will lead to government regulation "analogous to nuclear power plants," Consequently, he recommended that Google should perform semantic integration in clients' clouds so that client information in Google datacenters could be decrypted only by using a client's private key. [30] [ edit ] European Union European Union (EU) data protection officials (the Article 29 working party who advise the EU on privacy policy) have written to Google asking the company to justify its policy of keeping information on individuals’ internet searches for up to two years. The letter questioned whether Google has “fulfilled all the necessary requirements” on the EU laws concerning data protection. [31] The probe by the EU into the data protection issue, As of 24 May 2007 (2007 -05-24) [update] is continuing. On 1 June Google agreed that its privacy policy is vague, and that they are constantly working at making it clearer to users. [32] The resulting modifications to its privacy policies have been met with praise [33] . [ edit ] Norway The Data Inspectorate of Norway (Norway is not a member of the EU ) has investigated Google (and others) and has stated that the 18- to 24-month period for retaining data proposed by Google was too long. [34] Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Facebook 10 Privacy Settings Every Facebook User Should Know http://www.allfacebook.com/2009/02/facebook-privacy/ Facebook privacy: a guide http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/08/meshing-social-networking-and-privacy-on-facebook.ars Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se Naturlig behov Kulturell beståndsdel Social konstruktion Individ/grupp Om I är viktigt – hur mycket?
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se Orwell 1984 Telescreens Tankepolis Centraliserad makt
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se Foucault (1926-1984) & Benthams ( 1748 – 1832) ) model prison – The Panopticon Övervakningsarkitektur This shapes how individuals see themselves and leads them to behave differently than they might if they weren’t being observed
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Bismarck on his deathbed: Maybe this is the first example of the works of Paperazzi: Max Priester & Willy Wilcke took this picture secretly without consent; the even managed to shift the body so that the face would be more visible and turned the clock back. They sold the pictures until the Bismarck family confiscated the plates. The pictures later appeared in a.o. the Frankfurter Illustrierte Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- A reporter for the New York Daily News, Thomas Howard, sat in the front row as a woman named Ruth Snyder sat in the electric chair, in Sing Sing, in 1928; he had a concealed camera on his ankle, and he took a picture of Snyder as the electricity surged through her body. The picture sold an incredible amount of newspapers Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se Alison Chiang
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se 1996 fanns i Sverige 5 000 tillstånd 2002 fanns nästan det dubbla London uppskattas antalet kameror till 2,5 miljoner; en londonbo fotograferas 300 gånger om dagen. I Berlin måste butikerna ha övervakningskameror. Försäkringsbolagen sätter det som villkor för att teckna en försäkring. I Victoria i Australien försågs nyligen taxibilarna med kameror. Där filmas passagerarna under hela resan och dessutom spelas ljudet in. En affär i Norge filmade en kvinna & barn som tog en vara och gick utan att betala. För att identifiera snattarna spelade man sekvensen på en TV-skärm i butiken. ”Snattarna” blev snart identifierade och utpekade i hela byn… … men de hade lov av kassörskan att ta varan i utbyte mot en annan…
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se
- Maman by helen.2006 cc by nc sa Tuesday, September 8, 2009 Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se