Essay On Man Vs. Environment In To Build A Fire By Jack...

Essay on Man vs. Environment in To Build a Fire by Jack...
One can express many different types of themes in Jack London's, "To Build a Fire". Though I feel
strongly that London's theme in the story is about that the environment shapes who we are because it
shows that the man is not strong enough to live up to his environment. Allowing the environment to
kill the man indicates that he is weak both mentally and biologically, while on the other hand the
dog is stronger by surviving the same harsh environment. Instinct superior to reason is another
theme that is highly portrayal able in London's story. In order for the dog to survive and the man to
die, the dog required instinct, of which the man lacked. The man did acquire reason and observance
but not good enough to allow him to reach his goal ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The man is also weak in the face of nature as nature tortures him with the physical accidents the
man suffers. He firstly begins when his cheekbones and nose went numb and becomes worse as he
looses touch and grasp of his hands, finishing off with the freezing of his corpse and sudden stiff
death. London exclaims about the accounts the man has suffered, "This man did not know cold."
(London, 487) and "He was loosing in his battle with the frost." (London, 493) I do agree because
the man is a new comer, a chechaquo, meaning that it is the man's first contact with such freezing
environment. The man constantly through out the story efforts in combating against the forces of
nature that he can not control the reason being because he was inexperienced to such environment,
therefore the man is bound to be with the odds and like London exclaims, loose his battle with his
environment. The environment shaped him such that it proved he is not fit enough to live in the
extreme cold.
Alternatively, the dog has a different biology make up than the human. The husky dog has a thick
furry coat cuddling his warm body. Even though the dog probably never experienced such climate as
the man, its biology make up allows the dog to survive and is therefore fit enough to support such
extreme cold. The other difference between the man and the dog is
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Analysis Of Thomas Hardy 's ' Tess Of The D ' Urbervilles
English Lit Essay Draft
Throughout the 19th century in Victorian England, where Thomas Hardy lived and worked on his
poetry and novels, religion was becoming a popular controversy. Before this era Britain was highly
populated with Christians, a large number of the British public attending Church on a regular basis.
However, something changed in the 19th century; a significant number of public figures began to
announce their lack of religious beliefs. Scientific advances throughout the era, such as Charles
Darwin's Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection, caused the general British public to question
their previous judgement. Tim Lambert (2014) explains that an 1851 survey showed that just 40% of
the British population had visited Church on a particular Sunday. In 1881, the same survey showed
that just 1/3 of the population had visited Church; figures for Christianity were in decline.
Britain's fall in faith was reflected in Hardy's "Tess of the D'Urbervilles". Hardy almost expressed an
anti–Christian view on life, mocking Christian beliefs throughout the novel. George P. Landow
(2014) wrote that "Like so many other major Victorian authors who later in life had little sympathy
with Evangelical Christianity, as a young man Thomas Hardy had an important Evangelical phase
that left a deep impress on his thought." Hardy's phase of Christianity, and later disbelief in it, led to
the questioning of many moral and ethical issues which can be seen in his work. For example, in

The World is Too Much With Us by William Wordsworth Essay
The World is Too Much With Us by William Wordsworth
William Wordsworth's poem The world is too much with us is a statement about conflict between
nature and humanity. The symbolism in his poem illustrates a sense of the conviction and deep
feelings Wordsworth had toward nature. He longs for a much simpler time when the progress of
humanity was tempered by the restriction nature imposed. Wordsworth is saying in this poem that
man is wasting his time on earth by not appreciating nature around him. He is looking but not
beholding. "We have given our hearts away" (4) means that we have sold the part of us that is from
the earth (man which is from dust) in order to make other things more important than appreciating
life; such as, money or ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Unlike society, Wordsworth does not see nature as a commodity. The verse "Little we see in Nature
that is ours" (3), shows that coexisting is the relationship envisioned. This relationship appears to be
at the mercy of mankind because of the vulnerable way nature is described. The verse "This Sea that
bares her bosom to the moon" (5), gives the vision of a woman exposed to the heavens. In addition,
the phrase "sleeping flowers"(7) might also describe how nature is being overrun unknowingly.
Wordsworth seems to foresee the inevitable, because he sees himself as one with the environment.
The verse "I, standing on this pleasant lea, have glimpses that would make me less forlorn" (11–12),
shows Wordsworth as a visionary who is not responsible for the destruction of nature. In addition,
the change Wordsworth is hoping for will come in the form of a mighty revolt by nature. This is why
Wordsworth reaches back into ancient Greece for their gods who symbolize nature and strength to
make the change. Proteus was a sea god who could change his appearance to get away from capture.
Proteus is seen rising from the sea, facing the injustices inflicted upon nature, placing the cycle of
life back in balance. The ability to change ones appearance is critical in facing the variety of threats
mankind might impose. The god Triton was also mentioned as a savior to nature as well. Triton was
the most imposing of the gods

Comparative Souls, Contrasting Beings: Frankenstein and...
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley is a story about a man named Frankenstein who wants to understand
the creation of life. He does not fail in understanding it and actually applies what he knows into
making his own creature. However, the catch is that his creature is not anything as he imagines, he is
far too physically deformed to be accepted as a good creature. Frankenstein abandons him and the
creature takes on a life and mind of his own, but finds that no man will ever want to be around him.
As the story separates the characters, the two come together and that is when one can compare and
contrast them to each other. Thus, this story putting such opposite beings alongside each other
makes room for ways they may be similar but also ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He lost weight and his cheeks still hold onto the similarly feverish mind he has. Anytime he felt that
he could be peaceful being with Elizabeth, he failed to remove memories of William and Clerval's
deaths, which he believed since he created the monster to be his own fault. The memories also
immobilize Frankenstein into only feeling the pain of his miseries. However, he is not reaching a
concrete resolve about what to do with the murderous creature. He is not bringing himself back to
the physical world and out of his mental abyss that only serves as an area for him to relapse into a
horror he felt some years ago when he first made the creature.
Of course, the reason that his disasters affect him greatly is because he has people around him that
he loves. Clerval was his "beloved friend" (113). Therefore, the way he expresses his feelings for
Clerval explains why his mind was disturbed:
"Clerval...it delights me...to dwell on the praise of which you are so eminently deserving. He was a
being formed in the 'very poetry of nature'...His soul overflowed with ardent affections, and his
friendship was of that devoted and wondrous nature that the worldly–minded teach us to look for
only in the imagination." (113)

Essay on The Mind/Body Problem, Seen Through a Crisis
The Mind–Body Problem seen through a Crisis The issue of the origins of consciousness has been a
problem that has philosophers and scientists alike, puzzled for years. Is it a matter of science? Can it
be explained through neurobiological processes or is it just something that simply cannot be reduced
to words? Rene Descartes had struggled with this issue centuries ago, trying to explain this problem
through his idea of substance dualism. This idea states that the mind and body are of two separate
worlds, the physical world and the mental world. From this sprouts the mind–body problem, the
connection between mental phenomena and the physical world on which the mind depends. And
century's later, philosopher Edmund Husserl tries to tackle ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The way that humanistic disciplines work demonstrates how important our history and evolution has
impacted our spiritual sense. Because of our history, cultures have evolved and allowed a more open
sense of subjectivity, or a sense of self. On the other hand, natural sciences are more empirical in
nature and permit a more infinite possibility. And although the natural sciences, such as math and
physics, gives a mathematical–exact answer, Husserl states that "only natural science can abstract
with unbroken consistency from everything spiritual and investigate nature purely as nature"
(Husserl 271). From this, Husserl says that the natural sciences can only reach a certain point of
explanation. It seems as though the concrete sciences can only rationalize so much. Here lies the
problem, the humanistic sciences approaches the world through a more spiritual aspect, while the
natural sciences focus specifically on nature. The natural sciences contain a more objective approach
of viewing the world, while the humanistic discipline acknowledges, "...what is spiritual, to a self–
enclosed, purely spiritually coherent "world"..." (Husserl 271). When applying this concept of a
"crisis" to the real life, we see that there lies a crisis in the neuroscience of consciousness.
Neuroscience only

Themes of Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure Revealed in...
Themes of Shakespeare's Measure for Measure Revealed in Angelo's Soliloquies
Angelo's soliloquies (2.2.161–186; 2.4.1–30) express themes of the tragicomic form, grace and
nature, development of self–knowledge, justice and mercy, and creation and death as aspects of
Angelo's character.
By the theme of the tragicomic form I mean that which "qualified extremes and promoted a
balanced condition of mind [...] It employed a 'mixed' style, 'mixed' action, and 'mixed'
characters–'passing from side to side, it works amongst contraries, sweetly tempering their
composition'." (Guarini's Compendio della Poesia Tragicomica (1601) cited in Lever lxi–lxii). I take
Measure for Measure's tragicomic form as its major theme, or perhaps meta–theme, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
He says as much in his first soliloquy–he rots rather than blooms under virtuous influence (2.2.164–
167). The crux of Angelo's soliloquy is "Most dangerous / Is that temptation that doth goad us on /
To sin in loving virtue" (2.2.180–182). This equivocation signifies Angelo's transition from
condemning to embracing his love. Unused to thinking of love (of a novice) as anything other than
foul, Angelo acts accordingly. Later he laments forgetting his grace (4.4.31).
There are also shades of the theme of justice and mercy (Lever lxiii) in Angelo's soliloquies. To this
point Angelo has maintained a precisionist, inhuman (merciless) approach to law enforcement. To
this point two characters have asked him to consider that he might behave as Claudio had in similar
circumstances. In lines 2.2.174–176 he at last entertains that argument. Angelo becomes an example
of a legalistic or spiritual concept encountering interference from the realities of human existence
within a character. Lines 2.4.7–9, "The state, whereon I studied, [...]" also signify movement to a
middle way in his approach to law.
The theme creation and death (Lever lxxxiii) surfaces too. Angelo has condemned a man to die for a
creative act, an act Angelo has interpreted to be destructive. Not only is Angelo feeling the stirrings
that lead to procreation, his language uses the image of pregnancy, "[...] the strong and swelling evil
/ Of

Polixenes Jealousy
Furthermore, Shakespeare probably even sees vices as a beautiful work of nature, as how Polixenes
talks to Perdita about the carnations: nature is made better by no mean
But nature makes that mean: so, over that art
Which you say adds to nature, is an art
That nature makes. (4.4.104–7)
The word "mean" here might possess double meanings– it might not only refer to the method that
nature teaches man to plant and graft, but the word "mean" might also suggest the base quality of
man's meanness and inferiority. Here Polixenes speak of the beauty of grafting flowers, yet on a
broader view, Shakespeare might also suggest the significance to accept negative qualities, such as
melancholy, jealousy, and even foolishness, as natural and beautiful. For ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Even Time accuses Leontes, "The effects of his fond jealousies so grieving/ That he shuts up
himself" (4.1.18–9). The rejection of any possibility to change is a greater evil than the evil itself.
On the one hand, if the committer of a crime forever repents, he can no longer taste happiness. Ever
since Leontes admits it is his "shame perpetual," and swears, "Once a day I'll visit/ The chapel
where they lie, and tears shed there/ Shall be my recreation," his joy stops for more than a decade
(3.2.255–8). He would still regret at the sight of Florizel, "I lost a couple" (5.1.16). Hence, he looks
only back on objects dead. On the other hand, if the victim does not forgive, he can share no joy,
either. After Paulina condemns Leonte, "A thousand knees.../ Upon a barren mountain and still
winter/ In storm perpetual, could not move the gods/ To look that way thou wert," she not only loses
her husband, but also laments with "criminal" in the same manner (3.2.224–8). In the above two
quotes, the word "perpetual" appears twice– both of them cannot forgive, so they deny the
possibility of all. Because of this, their vows are against nature and time, as there is no such thing as
"perpetual" in a world with "Time." As a result, they lead to their own mishaps– it is even probable
that they own belief in the oracle has realized the torturing oracle

Essay On Nash Argues That Civilization Created Wilderness
1. How is wilderness an idea? How could it have a history?
The idea of wilderness is a human–based construct. It is highly subjective, scalable, and represents
different things to different people. Wilderness can be defined many ways, from a widely
uncultivated land, to a deeply personal experience, and anywhere in–between. It depends entirely on
the historical context assigned to it by humans. To Eastern cultures, wilderness was seen as a
connection between oneself and the universe. To Western cultures, wilderness was a dangerous,
uncivilized place. Wilderness can be considered as having a history because it is history. The
wilderness existed long before the early days of humanity (in fact, the wilderness is where scientists
often go when looking for answers about various aspects of the Earth's history), but it was humanity
who associated various philosophies to the wilderness. If wilderness is a place untouched by
humans, then the places touched by humans, referred to as "civilization" in this assignment, must be
intricately intertwined with wilderness– one cannot exist without the other.
2. Nash asserts that "civilization created wilderness" (p. xi). What does he mean? ... Show more
There was no concept of "wilderness" before humans. Humans began in the wild. However, due to
advancements in agriculture and domestication, man was set apart from nature for the first time.
This separation between man and nature grew, to where humans began to perceive certain aspects of
nature as a dark, unknown entity of "wildness", which was full of savage creatures and other
unknown dangers. These fears instigated a feeling of superiority based on a need for dominance
over the wilderness. Man lived in, and with, nature until this separation, when the concept of
"wilderness" began. Hence, the assertion, "civilization created

Student Observation Report Essay
Confidential
The names in this Observation Report have been changed to protect the privacy of the parents and
the child.
Student's Name : Calvin
Sex : Male
Place of Observation : Inside the classroom of County Preschool.
Time of Observation : In the morning, 10.30 a.m. and it was a sunny day.
General View :
The classroom was pretty well organized ( clean, tidy and many facilities inside such as books,
games, a computer and so on )
It was a pretty large group in the class, 13 children were there and the teacher was present as well.
It was an engaged class, where the students were actively engaged in learning. Activities Observed :
Class discussion
Individual seat work
Other ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Comment
Erikson tells us that for the children this age, it is a time for play not for formal education.
Aspect: Social / Emotional
Observation
The boy did not want to share controlling the
'mouse' with his peer.
Comment
Erikson tells us children in the intuitive phase (4 to
7 years) like him has a tendency to focus attention on one aspect of object while ignoring others.
Aspect: Cognitive

Observation
I tried to influence the boy so that he wants to share controlling the
'mouse' with his peer.
Comment
Piaget tells us that the children in the preoperational stage (2 to 7 years) are unaware of another
person's perspective. They exhibit egocentric thought.
Aspect: Social / Emotional
Observation
The boy interacted with his peer about the letters.
Comment
The Kennedy Krieger
Institute tells us that the children this age enjoy friendships, but these are generally one way
friendships. Aspect: Motor / Sensory Skill
The boy left the computer and moved to play puzzle. Comment
The Kennedy Krieger
Institute again tells us in its Developmental
Milestones that the children this age can put together multi piece
puzzles.
Aspect: Health / Physical
Observation I saw the boy losing some of his teeth.
Comment
According to The
Kennedy Krieger
Institute, the children 4 to
6 years old begin to loose their primary teeth and

Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises Essay
Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises
The title and narrative focus of Ernest Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises are rooted in a passage
from the Ecclesiastes. In referencing this book of the Hebrew Bible, Hemingway resorts to aged
scripture to unearth steadfast truths. His novel uses old–world beliefs to provide a solution for
modern day issues, asserting the undeniable value of tradition. The applicability of the Ecclesiastes
passage to Hemingway's portrait of hopelessness in the post–Great War generation demonstrates that
a reconnection with the natural world will reverse the unnatural consequences of a meaningless war
and permit the reestablishment of hope within the following generation.
The historicity and context of Hemingway's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hemingway depicts the expatriates' disconnect from the natural world in order to portray this
generation's improbable renewal. After participating in a war which went against the principles of
nature in its needless destruction, the expatriates have lost comprehension of the inherently human
will to desire and consequently accomplish. This cyclical course of completed events is lacking in
the expatriates' lives and is replaced by a linear repetition which conveys emptiness. Through
detachment from traditional human passions, the expatriates misunderstand fundamental laws of
nature. Passing a taxidermist in Paris, Bill suggests that Jake purchase a stuffed dog. He refers to the
practice of taxidermy as a "simple exchange of values. You give them money. They give you a
stuffed dog" (p. 78). Bill exalts a pattern formed by commerce and artificiality, which replaces the
traditional cycle of death and rebirth. He continues to describe a future purchase of a "horse–cab
stuffed for Christmas" (p. 79). The traditional holiday of Christmas, defined by its generous and
genuine gifts, is converted into a mocking showcase of falsely preserved nature. Hemingway
concludes this passage with Bill's assertion, "I'm a nature–writer," (p. 80) an ironic statement which
illuminates a lack of knowledge for his field due to a misconception of the natural cycle. Stuffed
animals

The Nature of King Lear Essay
The most prevailing images in King Lear are the images (metaphoric and actual) of nature. The
concept of nature seems to consume the dialogue, monologues, and setting.
It might be useful to view nature as `the natural order of the world' (and, perhaps, the universe).
When one goes against the natural order, chaos will follow. Shakespeare has made this point clear in
"Troilus and Cressida" where Ulysses predicts that once "the specialty of rule hath been neglected
disaster will follow, for take but degree away, untune that string, and hark what discord follows"
(I.iii). But what are the natural orders that were upset in King Lear? First, and foremost, King Lear
divided his kingdom and stepped down from the throne. A king of divine ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
215).
As Regan and Goneril show their disdain and, thereby, expose their `natural' selves to Lear, his
recognition of them and the wrong he did to Cordelia are also expressed with the language of nature;
of Cordelia he says, "O most small fault, how ugly dids't thou in Cordelia show! That, like an
engine, wrenched my frame of nature from the fixed place" (I.iv. 262–265). And when Lear realizes
that both Regan and Goneril have deceived him, he calls them "unnatural hags" (II.iv. 276).
Lear's actions of distributing his kingdom to his daughters (which in a patriarchal society such as
Lear's is against natural law) and his rashness of expelling Cordelia and wrongly rewarding Regan
and Goneril, were a violation and misreading of true nature which, from that point on, lead to the
destruction and death of Lear and his family.
The subplot in King Lear is of Gloucester and his sons Edmund and Edgar. Edmund, the
illegitimate, bastard son, can be seen as somehow unnatural according to the laws of society at that
time. Gloucester himself says to Kent, regarding Edgar, "But I have, sir, a son by order of law..." (I.i.
18). The subtext here is that Edmund's conception was outside the law and unnatural to the social
structure.
Like Lear, Gloucester fails to see the true nature of his children and also invokes the language of
nature in blind ways. After wrongly condemning Edgar he calls Edmund a "loyal and natural boy"
(II. i. 85).
In speaking of Edmund in

Contrasting Interactions with the Environment Depicted in...
How is our character revealed through our interaction with the natural world around us? Do we
adapt to fit in with nature, or do we force the landscape to conform to our ideals of lifestyle? In the
short story "The Shining Houses", Alice Munro addresses the contrast in lifestyle ideologies
between two generations through their interactions with the natural environment they populate. The
older generation is content to live in harmony with the existing natural world and develop its
infrastructure amongst the present landscape. Meanwhile, the younger generation believes in
destroying the original terrain by constructing a new environment fitted to a theme of exoticism and
novelty. The observation of such interaction with the environment ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Construction of the city consumes minimal resources because the assets already present are
conserved rather than destroyed. The houses themselves, although "unpainted and patched" are
simple but effective structures. This shows how rather than dwelling on superfluous aesthetics, the
older generation devotes itself to more fruitful endeavors. For example, residences sport compost
heaps. The implementation of such devices preserves and recycles many resources, further
emphasizing the conservative ideology of the older generation. While their practical lifestyle is
compared to "savagery" by the younger generation, the city of the old generation is really an
example of their efficiency.
On the contrary, the lifestyle of the younger generation is one that embraces radical alteration of the
surrounding environment to match a visual image created by the movers–in. Young men, unfamiliar
with manual labor, work hard to cut and burn the bushes which surround their homes, in the hopes
that in two years their yards may be decorated by "ornamental shrubs". Either they have very
specific tastes in exotic shrubbery or they have despicable planning skills. The fact that the men are
young professionals would suggest the former. Even so, they persist at their contradictory task
during the weekend. The fact that such weekends could be spent with family would suggest that the
priority the men

The Outbreak of Natural Philosophy from Religion Essay
The Outbreak of Natural philosophy from Religion Science was not as prominent as it is now
before, some people rejected science and all it had to offer for a long time. This was primarily
because of the fact that people did not want to change their belief, not only theirs but their previous
generations had believed in this also. This religious dogma they had believed in all their life, it was
not until about the scientific revolution in the 16th century that science was widely accepted by all.
Thales and his students although wrong were the ones who directed speculative thoughts and also
started the process that brought physics, chemistry and other sciences. They were part of the first set
of philosophers who started to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These ideas although they were wrong are what made the human mind break out from its one sided
thinking in the belief of a divine body that was the cause of everything that happened in the natural
world. The method they adopted was close study through the use of experiments and all other
research methods to fully understand a situation. Religion is the belief or faith without reason of a
divine body that governs the natural order of the world. In the past it was believed that the divine
body was the cause of everything that happened in the natural world, like diseases, natural disasters
the rain and every other thing that happened in the world. The two most renowned religions are
Christianity and Islam, Christianity was one of the first major religions of the world and at a point it
played a major part in the politics of the world. There were a few battles that went on between the
Christianity and Islam, these battles were caused by territorial battles, differences in belief and
conversion of pagans to a particular religion. Christianity dominated as the major religion for a long
time in the past, old rulers used to kill pagans or followers of other religions. The ruling in the past
was if a king or the ruler of a city were to be a follower of a particular religion all of the people
under him had to convert to that religion. The religious ideas of the past were not gotten from the
use of

What Intimate Relationship Between Transparent Logic,...
Japanese autodidact modernist architect Tadao Ando, explores the intimate relationship between
transparent logic, abstraction, nature and place through the study of material and form and the
interaction between the everyday human life and it's surrounding in his architecture. The interplay of
these elements are evident through his body of work especially his residential Koshino House and
Extension project. His broad depth in understanding the inherent fundamental human needs and his
close study of famous modernist architects such as Le Corbusier and Frank Lloyd Wright has
resulted in his prevailing success.
"I create architectural order on the basis of geometry... and in this way to develop a theory of parts
that is founded on the sensibility of the Japanese people". As a child growing up in front of a wood
workshop, being fascinated by what he saw, at the age of 10 – 17 Ando became an apprentice,
learning to create wooden models and the skills of a carpenter. There he discovered the beauty of the
balance between a form and the material it is made of. However it was not until he was 18, when he
discovered a book about Le Corbusier and began to travel and analyse traditional and contemporary
architecture in Japan, Europe and the United States, he came to understand these relationships in
actual architecture as an entire physical being. (pritzker prize). His visit to the Pantheon in Rome
and Le Corbusier's Únite d'Habitation flourished his own understanding of spatial

Analyzing Rachel Carson’s “the Obligation to Endure” Essay
Analyzing Rachel Carson's "The Obligation to Endure" In her essay "The Obligation to Endure",
Rachel Carson alerts the public to the dangers of modern industrial pollution. She writes about the
harmful consequences of lethal materials being released into the environment. She uses horrifying
evidence, a passionate tone, audience, and the overall structure of her essay to express to her readers
that the pollution created by man wounds the earth. There are many different ways that pollution can
harm the environment, from the nuclear explosions discharging toxic chemicals into the air, to the
venomous pesticides sprayed on plants that kills vegetation and sickens cattle. The adjustments to
these chemicals would take generations. Rachel ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is an efficient strategy. It makes her audience want to get involved and preserve the natural
resources the environment has to offer. In her essay she describes the devastating effects chemicals
have on the environment with such conviction; it might make the reader feel obligated to make
changes in his or her own life to help the natural world. Rachel Carson uses an assertive tone to get
her point across. She has a one–sided argument and is very aggressive to those who oppose her point
of view. She is very effective at stating her opinion to her audience. In her essay Rachel Carson
targets anyone who will listen as her audience. She wants to inform human beings of the effects
chemicals have on the environment. Rachel Carson's audience had little knowledge of the effects
radiation and pesticides might have on nature or to themselves. She successfully enlightened her
audience to the harm man was causing to the environment not only presently, she also wrote of
future ramifications. She predicts "Future historians may well be amazed by our distorted sense of
proportion. How could intelligent beings seek to control a few unwanted species by methods that
contaminated the entire environment...?" (Carson 615). This statement might make her audience
scrutinize their actions through the eyes of future generations. Rachel Carson used cause and effect,
problem and solution, compare and contrast, and

Theme Of Romanticism In The Scarlet Letter
Romanticism was a movement in the arts and literature that took place in the 18th century. It was a
style of literature that was emphasized on emotion, inspiration, and individuality. The Scarlet Letter
was a dark romance novel that portrayed the simplicity and naturalness of romanticism. The novel
was a clear example of romanticism literature as seen through Hawthorne's focus of the natural
world, religion institution, and the consuming action of revenge.
The natural world played a crucial role in "The Scarlet Letter". As human emotion and nature is
heavily emphasized, Hawthorne made it seem that he believed in the strong connection between the
two. He made the forest his main stage for the novel and explored the empowering forces that nature
brought forth. Throughout the novel, it is made very clear that the forest is seen as Hester's safe
haven as she is isolated from the community. It provided Hester comfort, healing, and life, also
allowing her to become her truest self. The spirit of nature is also highlighted as it is embodied into
Hester's child, Pearl. Out of all the characters, Pearl is very different due to the emphasized
relationship she has with nature. It is shown that because of Hester's sins, it causes nature to accept
Pearl. Hawthorne brings nature to life making it seem to empathize with the child. The empathy is
shown as Pearl is seen trying to catch the light the sun gives off. Hawthorne describes the
acceptance she receives as he declares that the light lingers onto the child, as if happy to be her
playmate, and how the great forest accepts her as one of their own. As Hester connects with the
natural spirit, it enables her to rekindle her forbidden love with Dimmesdale. The solitude that
nature provides allows the two to rediscover themselves and their love. As they meet years after
their affair in the forest, it is almost as though the disapproval and judgement from their town had
never existed. The natural world pervades the couple with peace and strength. The shame that the
town imposes onto Hester gives off a feeling that seems unnatural while the unity feeling that Hester
and Dimmesdale gets from the forest is seen as and feels natural. Not only has Hawthorne shown
romanticism

Dylan Thomas
Despite Dylan Thomas’ often obscure images, he expresses a clear message of religious
devotion in many of his poems. He creates images that reflect God’s connection with the
earth and body. In “And death shall have no dominion,” Thomas portrays the
redemption of the soul in death, and the soul’s liberation into harmony with nature and God.
Thomas best depicts his beliefs, though abstract and complicated, to the reader with the use of
analogies and images of God’s presence in nature. Appreciating the virtue of humility in
“Shall gods be said to thump the clouds,” Thomas associates God with thunder,
rainbows, and night only to remind us that He is even more present in a simple stone as He is ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In “Shall gods be said to thump the clouds,” Thomas asks whether the gods are
thumping the clouds in thunder or weeping when it rains. Illustrating God’s presence in all
natural events, glorious or not, Thomas neglects to answer his own questions in the first three
stanzas, but indirectly answers them in the last. “It shall be said that gods are stone. / Shall a
dropped stone drum on the ground, / Flung gravel chime? Let the stones speak / With tongues that
talk all tongues.” In this stanza, Thomas reveals his own portrayal of God’s humility
and universal domain. Because God is present in all of nature, He is present in the simplest stone as
well as the tremendous thunder and brilliant rainbows. This poem illustrates God’s message
of humility. He claims the more humble and simple we are, the more holy we have become. As one
of the Beatitudes states, “Blessed are the meek, for they shall possess the earth.”
(Matthew 5:4) The other concise message of this stanza, one of the easiest to interpret, is the last
verse. This verse suggests that not only does God love the devout, but He loves the sinful and
impoverished as well. This line could also be interpreted that God loves all of creation, and His love
is universal. No matter what language one speaks or land one lives in, God is present

Essay on A Summary of David Abram’s Animism and the Alphabet
Isaiah Graham
Farmer
ENG 11–940
9/13/2013
A Summary of David Abram's Animism and the Alphabet
David Abram's selection, "Animism and the Alphabet" conveys that human's disconnection from the
natural world is partially at fault with the alphabet, it also asserts that alphabet originates from the
natural world. Abrams supports his ideas by mentioning several great thinkers throughout history
including Plato, Socrates and others. Abram's also compares modern ways to the customs of
indigenous people. The main purpose of Abram's paper is to convey the idea that people have
disconnected from the natural world, and one of the main reasons for this is the alphabet. The
alphabet is not portrayed as a bad thing, but as a tool that has both ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Some would say that this was an improvement and the Greeks would agree. Others would say this
was just another step in our departure from nature. The beginning of this departure would appear to
have started with the aleph–beth, but the Greeks took the system and stripped it of all natural
references. Abrams begins the next section of the text by referring to Socrates. Socrates says "I'm a
lover of learning, and trees and country won't teach me anything, whereas men in the town do" (pg.
34). This begins a long discussion on whether or not the human race has learned anything from the
natural world. Homer is mentioned several times and it becomes apparent that throughout his tales
the Iliad and the Odyssey nature is seen as a supreme being. The Greek gods are portrayed by the
natural world, so how could Socrates say something as controversial as the Earth won't teach him
anything. In part it is because the Greek society relied extensively on the social aspect of life. Most
Athenians learned from men in the city and not from the Earth around them, so there was no real
way for them to conceive the idea that nature could teach. There were a few who looked beyond this
however and saw the natural world for what it was. Abrams continues on by explaining that the
Greeks were an oral culture and the alphabet was still being learned. Homers epics were the first
stories to ever be written down by the Greeks. This seems slightly ironic

The Naturalistic Ideals of Jack London Essay
The Naturalistic Ideals of Jack London As an adolescent, Jack London led an impoverished life and
struggled to earn more money to support himself and his mother. In an attempt to find a small
fortune, London joined the Klondike Gold Rush in 1897. Unfortunately, he returned home penniless.
However, his adventures in the Yukon provided him the most epic experiences that guided him into
writing some of his most famous, widely acclaimed literary works. His novels focus primarily on
naturalism, a type of literature in which the characters are shaped by their environment through the
practice of scientific principles. The author centralizes his themes around this literary technique.
Jack London's naturalistic portrayal of his characters explores ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Through his vivid writing style, London captures the spirit of the wilderness and that "life was a
struggle for survival... the 'fittest' would come out on top" (Napierkowski and Stanley). Again, this
philosophy is the result of Buck's destiny shaped by a force beyond his control. He is heavily
influenced by his pack leader's incessant teasing and desire for a fight. Through these conflicts,
Buck evolves into the most savage, fearless animal that roams the winter nights. London sees
Darwinism as "a law of life" (Berkove) and Buck has certainly accomplished it. He successfully
achieves the status of alpha dog by later killing the pack leader and proving himself to be the
"fittest". Although this process is very difficult, London manages to evoke a brighter side to the
situation. Buck's struggle for survival produces a new personality fit for the environment of the
Yukon, thus completing his transformation. However, there is a fine line between the struggle for
survival for a human and an animal. In his story "To Build a Fire", Jack London reveals the
teamwork required from both the man and the dog in order to conquer the ruthlessly cold winter. "To
Build a Fire" centers on a man trekking out into the below zero temperatures of the Yukon with his
dog companion and ultimately succumbs to the unrelenting force of nature. The man puts his best
battle with the wild but to no avail.

Essay on Naturalistic Observation
OBSERVATIONAL RESEARCH
Overview
Observational research is type of correlational (i.e., nonexperimental) research in which a researcher
observes ongoing behavior. There are a variety of types of observational research, each of which has
both strengths and weaknesses. These types are organized below by the extent to which an
experimenter intrudes upon or controls the environment.
Naturalistic Observation
Naturalistic observation, also known as nonparticipant observation, has no intervention by a
researcher. It is simply studying behaviors that occur naturally in natural contexts, unlike the
artificial environment of a controlled laboratory setting. Importantly, in naturalistic observation,
there is no attempt to manipulate variables. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because of reactivity; people you're observing will act differently if they know the situation isn't
natural, that the event isn't natural, or that they're being measured. Is this a problem in laboratory
research? Don't participants know they're being observed and measured? Wouldn't this affect their
behavior? Absolutely, positively, yes! But for whatever reason, reactivity is (for the most part)
ignored in laboratory research.
Participant Observation
Here, unlike naturalistic observation, the researcher intervenes in the environment. Basically, this
refers to inserting yourself as a member of a group in order to observe behavior you wouldn't
otherwise have access to. Although it seems like naturalistic observation and participant observation
are simply categories, you should understand that there is a really a continuum of intrusion into the
environment. It depends on the extent to which the researcher is involved in the research study. For
example, if someone sets up an event (e.g., putting trash in a path to see who picks it up), this is not
naturalistic observation (see criteria above). This is also not participant observation research because
the researcher is not a part of the group being observed. Think of this as a continuum with
naturalistic observation on one end and participant observation on the other.
Here are two famous examples of participant observation:
Example

Muir and Wordsworth Essay
Lesson 06.09 Assessment
Thesis Statement, Opening Paragraph, evidence & conclusion REVISED
While both poets Muir and Wordsworth wrote about the happy feelings that they have towards
nature the beautiful outdoors or what some people may say Mother Nature, some of which the
feelings are the same and some that are different as they speak of the different plants.
In every walk with Nature one receives far more than he seeks." – John Muir Nature does not only
show the beauty of the Earth, but it shows the beauty within us. So then, is it not easy to say that
both of these authors have great beauty within them? After reading both "Calypso Borealis," –John
Muir and "I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud" –William Wordsworth, I can boldly state that ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Muir creatively informs the reader just how much the main character truly loves nature. The same
marvel and beauty is shared in the poem "I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud." After a long climb over a
high hill he finds his reward a valley shining with a huge field of daffodils. "Besides the lakes,
beneath the trees, fluttering and dancing in the breeze." As Wordsworth explains the scene. As each
scene pops out of the poem, a new addition to the painting in your mind appears each time. The
painting may vary from person to person, but I believe the same sense of awe is present with every
mind. The portions cited are just the beginning of these two works; enough to splash your mind with
colors and emotions, but later parts are what truly makes them worth reading.
"Calypso Borealis" turns from revelation to a desperate situation. Weary and empty, the main
character prepares to spend the night in the wet swamp, in a tree nest. Just as the sun was about to
set, the future very unpredictable, when "Everything seemed most dangerous and discouraging", the
story continues, "I found beautiful Calypso on the mossy bank of stream." Overwhelmed by the
purity and beauty of the Calypso, he collapses by the flower and cries. This rather quick change of
pace I what kept me reading, and the fact the Calypso was so beautiful it made the main character
break down in tears. Imagine finding the glorious treasure you've been seeking the entire time. The
change of tone from depressing to

Some Readers Have Seen Frankenstein as an Illustration of...
The 19th century was a time of enlightenment where philosophical thought began and man's
concern for a greater psychological form developed. However, during this time of enlightenment
and exploration, the values of religion and ethical thought challenged science and its moral
reasoning. Frankenstein could be seen as an illustration of the fear of the power of science due to
these social changes; however there is evidence within the text to support other aspects such as
society and religion being the focal point of fear.
On a basic level, it could be argued that Victor's search for knowledge ultimately leads him to his
transgressions and eventual demise; through the medium of science he is able to create a creature
that is fearful and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, although Victor uses science and his character is obsessed with the search for knowledge,
it could be argued that Shelley deliberately leaves out specific scientific references to leave the
readers wondering if it is science that creates the monster, or if there is more of a supernatural,
Gothic interpretation of how the monster came to live.
Comparatively, some readers could believe that Frankenstein illustrates the fear of the power of
religion. Victor's creation of the monster is ultimately a transgression, defiling morality and arguably
giving him ultimate power over life and death. The idea alone is fear inducing, but further still is the
way in which Victor goes about this achievement. He is emotionally detached from the bodies he is
digging out of graves and mutilating "a churchyard was to me merely the receptacle of bodies
deprived of life", sparing no thought of the unspoken moral codes of humanity. There are also the
interesting parallels of John Milton's Paradise Lost; the Monster finds the book and interprets it
literally "I read it... as a true history"; as many Christians interpret the Bible literally; this could
represent the fear of the power of religion, as it suggests that people who take religious teachings
absolutely literally are dangerous because they have no logical reasoning, as the monster does not.
Furthermore, the monster compares Victor to God, as he has created him and thusly

Mary Olive 'Spring' Analysis Essay
Spring reflects a deep communion with the natural world, offering a fresh viewpoint of the
commonplace or ordinary things in our world by subverting our expected and accepted views of that
object which in turn presents a view that operates from new assumptions. Oliver depicts the natural
world as a celebration of wonder and awe, the almost insignificant wonders capturing the true
beauty nature beholds.
Spring is a poem that visibly illustrates this, representing the natural world to be full of wonder
through imagery and metaphors without actually stating what the wonders are. The poem Spring
observes a bear that has risen from hibernation due to the awakening of another season, spring. It's
"four black fists... flicking the gravel... her ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It encourages human beings to see themselves as part of the ecological system and to be one with
nature. It questions the hierarchies of empires and of the human and natural world itself, suggesting
that we must learn to love and transcend with the natural world, instead of seeking domination over
it.
Like Spring, Wild Geese is written in casual language, but still manages to be stimulating and
powerful. It's rational simplicity truly captures the might of the words that sweep through our hearts
to provoke a feeling of unity and tranquillity with nature. This is exactly what Oliver is attempting
to portray through her poems, Wild Geese especially, by reminding us that we as a human race are
so preoccupied with the melodramatics of life that we fail to see the beauty and wonders
surrounding us, and that we should sit back and follow the natural and simple path the non–human
world follows.
The title itself almost says the poem, providing implicit imagery and evoking a sense of freedom
and wilderness. The geese are free and natural, unlike humans who are constrained by the values
and attitudes inhibited on us by society in which we conform to and accept, hindering our ability to
be truly free and released like the natural world is.
Religious connotations

Television's Effects on the Natural Environment Essay
Television's Effects on the Natural Environment You may be thinking, "How on earth could the TV
have an affect on our natural environment?" and you have every right to. At first glance, it may seem
impossible that the TV can have an effect on our natural surroundings; but, nevertheless, it does.
One of the ways that the TV can have an effect on our surroundings is by the amount of power that
is needed to run all of the TV's in the world. I realize, that compared to other appliances, a television
does not use a huge amount of energy. But think about this: almost every family in America has at
least one TV if not more (some people that I know have upwards of 6 and 7). Can you imagine the
power it must take to run all ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
You've seen some examples of the bad; now let us focus on the good.
These same people that I have just talked about above can also help the environment. Scientists who
make documentaries can be very helpful to the environment as well. If they are able to travel into
the wilderness to study animals and wildlife, a video camera can be a useful tool. The scientists,
with the help of a video camera, can record their observations of these animals and view them later
on a television or place them on television where others, who were not able to travel to the particular
location, can watch and observe these animals as well. The ability to do this helps the environment
in two ways: 1) It helps scientists and other experts understand our natural world much better
enabling them to help preserve it, and it 2) promotes education of the environment to those who are
not scientists. As you can see, the TV has an effect on our environment for good and bad, even
though it may be indirect.
When I say natural environment, you probably only think about the ways in which it affects our land
and animals, but there is another aspect: human health. Television has had a great impact on human
health since its invention in 1926. Americans, and humans in general, spend huge amounts of time
watching television each year. When people watch TV, they are giving up time in which they could
be exercising. As a consequence of this lack of exercise,

Des Esseintes' Infatuation with Artifice in Huysmans'...
Des Esseintes' Infatuation with Artifice in Huysmans' Against Nature
In J.–K Huysmans Against Nature, Des Esseintes rebels against his family, religion, and Parisian
society to establish an identity unique to himself. He perceives this rejection of the truistic self as the
development of individuality when, in actuality, it is only a self deriving from his reaction to the
overstimulated public. By decorating his abode with eccentric objects, he falsely believes that he can
detach himself from the common populace. When he finds new objects to focus upon, he is able to
depose his emotions and instill them within the object. Des Esseintes wants to be a rare individual;
through his bizarre purchasing and decorum he thinks he is his ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Among these predetermined characteristics that make Des Esseintes eccentric from birth, his parents
are both faded characters; his mother had nervous attacks when she was under lights or heard noises
and his father "was almost a complete stranger" because he was constantly on business trips5. His
mother's need to be in darkness gives reason as to why Des Esseintes enjoys colours and light.
Esseintes becomes a radically outlandish character in opposition to his extremely drab, distant
parents. His childhood is riddled with boredom and solitude which enforces his natural tendency to
be an outcast. While Des Esseintes may claim to have a unadulterated identity, he does many things
in response to his upbringing:
"Thus, in hateful and contemptuous memory of his childhood, he had suspended from the ceiling of
this room a little silver cage containing a cricket which chirped as other crickets had once chirped
among the embers in the fireplace at Chateau de Lourps. Whenever he heard this familiar sound, all
the silent evenings of constraint he had spent in his mother's company and all the misery he had
endured in the course of a lonely, unhappy childhood came back to haunt him"6.
By having this as a reminder of his mother and of Chateau de Lourps, Des Esseintes is momentarily
able to purge himself of the past. The object is an escape from the reality of his past memories and
recollections. When he engages in

Analysis Of The Book ' Romans '
Romans 1–8 is a cornucopia of information that can only be understood by sufficiently delving into
the whole book in order to get the full meaning. This part of the book leads us from our total lives
full of sin to God's devotion to vindicate us, blessing us, and glorifying us by our religion through
his good will. The book of Romans is guide set aside to teach God 's people about different aspects
of the Christianity. It gives people insight into how we should look at the natural Earth, It explains
our identity as Christians, It relates how our relationships should progress, and it discusses culture
and refinement.
Romans 6:11 (KJV) – Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto
God through Jesus Christ ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is all in the nature of the world we inhabit every bit well as man 's to repeat our mistakes and sins
continually. However, it is only through God's blessing that we can be saved.
Romans 1:20 (KJV) – For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen,
being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are
without excuse:
When mankind sinned through the noncompliance, we were singled out by God. Because of this the
natural world and man began to die spiritually and subsist in a condition of evil. This sin affected
about every type of wickedness. Man's human identity is known only through Christ and his
precepts on the nature of humanity. It is in our nature that we are born in sin; thus it is our natural
human drive that we explore this sin to the satisfaction of the human race.
Romans 2:14 (KJV) – For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things
contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
Man cannot deny or deprive himself of these desires. It is solely through Christ who committed to
conquering death and forgive us our sins through the endowment of blessing. We are deprived
within ourselves. There is to some degree something immoral with us that we as individuals cannot
repair. Hence, we ask Jesus to justify, sanctify and glorify us. Therefore, it is only by the admission
of this sin and

Essay on Comparing the Two Versions of To Build a Fire
Comparing the Two Versions of To Build a Fire
"I am absolutely confident that beyond the motif itself, there is no similarity of treatment whatever"
(544). Jack London, writing in December 1908, was responding to an inquiry from the Richard W.
Gilder, editor of Century Magazine. Gilder, having just published "To Build a Fire" in his magazine,
was worried when he came across another version published 6 years earlier. London's explanation
was that the first story was for boys and the new one was for men; the only similarity being the
motif itself. Through careful analysis of the two stories, in light of this letter to Gilder, and another
letter to Cloudesly Johns, it is apparent that although London claims no similarities ... Show more
This ending more clearly illustrates the dangers of the Klondike. The first version is more a morality
tale, ending with the moral of "Never travel alone!" (62). The second version is more of a good short
story, with the ending that is, regrettably, all too common in that part of the world. The main
character never gets a chance to change his ways and travel with a companion the proverbial "next
time." He learns the lesson with the most severest of consequences: death. Another interesting
difference is the fact that in the 1902 version the main character is Tom Vincent; however in the
second version, the man has no name. This gives the main character in the 1908 version a feeling of
universality.
In 1900, before either of these two stories was published, Jack London wrote a letter to a good
friend, Cloudesly Johns, explaining his philosophy on good fiction writing. This letter is an
invaluable resource when studying the work of Jack London, especially when comparing the two
versions of "To Build a Fire." London emphasized quite a bit in this letter with many exclamation
points and capital letters. That was only because of the passion with which he was writing about
writing. His main point was to not be to scientific, or "empirically" (530) scientific. He explains not
to tell the reader what your philosophy is, but rather to have the characters tell it by their "deeds,
actions, talk, etc." (531). He then moves on to talk about atmosphere, and

Night: Essence of Nature a Poem Compossed by Louise Bogan...
What is the significance of an individual's essence within the vast universe? Surrounded in an
environment where all life resides do humans play the role of hegemony? Each human is unique,
separated by interactions and relationships compiled throughout the journey of life. But, no matter
how these experiences could shape an individual, the most basic pillars of life will always endure.
All humans share land on this planet, breathe the same air, and are equally mortal. Composed by
Louise Bogan, the role of humanity is put into perspective in the poem, "Night." The speaker
emphasizes nature's immense presence in the universe. As the plot of "Night" develops, the
interconnected relationships found in nature are revealed, using imagery to show ... Show more
"Where what breathes, breathes / and what drinks, drinks," the persona says (3,5). Natures
relationships depicted in the first stanza are beautiful. At first, something as simple as the "islands"
may seem unimportant (1). Once analyzed, its purposed is defined by providing a warm home for
life to sustain. Without the "restless wind" and "incoming tide," the animals could not sustain (4,6).
Everything in the universe is interconnected.
As the poem continues into the second and third stanza the persona uses imagery as a tool to express
natures power. From the water to the sky, Bogan's poem describes how nature will continue to
outlast humanity, thriving under a repeated cycle of life. Compared to the conditions described in
"Night," all human endeavors are naturalized. Line seven and eight explains, "shell and weed / wait
upon the salt wash of the sea." Long before the story of Adam and Eve, nature represented a
powerful force of life and sustainment. Over thousands of years of tides, the "shell and weed"
described by the auditor, are conditioned to expect resources from exterior conditions (7).
Systematically, the universe provides nature will all conditions necessary for survival. A miracle.
Even the "stars" located in outer space have a role as they swing their lights westward / to set behind
the land", the speaker suggests (9–11). Using imagery, the auditor is able to understand the universe
attains limits much greater then humanity. Thomas Edison is credited

William Golding's Lord of the Flies Essay
The Schoolboys Versus The Island
When your life is on the line and you are threatened, some of you human instincts will take over. In
the next couple paragraphs you will see how the boys on the island express their survival skills
against nature, deal with their surroundings and how it reflects their character, and how they evolve
and adapt to their isolated world. But maybe most of all just being a little lucky and being the most
fit for the environment. When it comes down to it, you will do whatever necessary to survive.
When you are in the wild, you do whatever you can to survive. It is all about survival of the fittest.
Especially if there are no rules like in the book. This shows a lot between Jack and Ralph. It seems
pretty ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Jack displays the side of man in which humanity takes over and violently destroys nature. He blends
in with his environment by putting clay on his face, "He rubbed the charcoal stick between the
patches of red and white on his face" (Golding – 63). This demonstrates that he has outsmarted the
island. Jack also scorches the forest near the end of the book, "Behind him, the whole island was
shuddering with flame" (Golding – 201). This incident reflects his deepening contempt for nature
and demonstrate his violent character. Jack also resides on Castle Rock, the highest point on the
island. Jack living above everything else symbolizes that he is omnipotent. Simon manifests the part
of man that is at one with the world. Simon refuses to eat the meat of the pig Jack killed, "Simon,
sitting between the twins and Piggy, wiped his mouth and shoved his piece of meat over the rocks to
Piggy, who grabbed it" (Golding – 74). This explains that he refuses to harm the forest's animals,
unlike Jack, who only wants to murder them. He also retreats to the forest, where he does most of
his thinking and finds comfort, "I'll go if you like. I don't mind, honestly" (Golding – 117). This
expresses that he enjoys the wooded area of the island and finds solitude and harmony with his
environment. Ralph exemplifies the area of man that submits to the island. He understands that
nature is an

David Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Essay
David Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion provide conflicting arguments about the
nature of the universe, what humans can know about it, and how their knowledge can affect their
religious beliefs. The most compelling situation relates to philosophical skepticism and religion; the
empiricist character, Cleanthes, strongly defends his position that skepticism is beneficial to
religious belief. Under fire from an agnostic skeptic and a rationalist, the empiricist view on
skepticism and religion is strongest in it's defense. This debate is a fundamental part of the study of
philosophy: readers must choose their basic understanding of the universe and it's creator, upon
which all other assumptions about the universe will be made. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
When they are young, they will be taught about the supremacy of religion and the fallibility of
philosophy and science. Demea's theology resembles the "god of the gaps" perspective, where any
failings of science and philosophy is more reason to believe that God exists within the things we
cannot explain. He hopes that as his students learn of this, they will believe that the paramount
objective of their education is to learn the nature of God, who is most important and constant being
in the universe. To summarize, Demea believes that humans will never fully understand the
universe; thus, the failure of science to provide explanations is the greatest proof of God and
greatest justification for faith.
Philo heckles the ideas of Demea while imposing his own ideas. As an empiricist and a skeptic, he
calls to "let us become thoroughly sensible of the weakness, blindness, and narrow limits of human
reason." (131) Philo believes that because humans have been historically ignorant about science and
the universe, that humanity

Natural Hazards are Rarely Completely Natural Essay
Natural Hazards are Rarely Completely Natural
Throughout the world, natural hazards are a frequent occurrence. They come in the forms of
hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and floods, to name but a few. On a range of scales they
create disaster, destruction, loss of life and of livelihood. Natural processes have occurred in the
natural environment for millions of years. They are events that happen naturally, e.g. blizzards and
floods. A natural process only becomes a natural hazard when the risk of human loss is presented. To
put it in context, a flood in an unoccupied valley is a natural process, whereas a flood in a valley
where a village is situated is a natural hazard. Natural ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, as the village of Boscastle is situated in the valley, it became a natural hazard. Extensive
damage was inflicted upon the properties in the village, and human life was put to risk, although
thankfully none was lost. A bakery owner spoke of his losses: "There's bits of trees and wood and
God knows what in here that doesn't belong. The walls are gone, the bread rack is smashed to
pieces, there are electric wires everywhereâ€¦". It could be said that the paved surfaces of the
village's streets added to the surface runoff into the stream and worsened the flooding situation. This
cannot alone be blamed for the events, but it may have added to the fact that it was not an entirely
natural occurrence. The flooding of Boscastle quickly escalated from a natural process to a natural
hazard.
It is not debatable that hurricanes cannot be generated, or fought, by humans. Hurricane Charley hit
the coast of Florida on Sunday, August the 13th 2004. It was the most devastating hurricane to hit
the area since 1921. It came from the Gulf of Mexico with a strength of 120mph, and it was warned
by officials that the hurricane could submerge parts of the city of Tampa, eastern Florida. This
caused mass panic as residents tried to flee, blocking bridges and infrastructure. Again, had the area
been unoccupied, the hurricane would have remained a natural process rather than

Cosmology: Science Vs Religion Essay
In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Christian belief encountered significant opposition. Until
then, most of the world shared the belief of the "Medieval world view" that not only was the earth
positioned at the center of the universe, but that God was all knowing, all powerful and all good.
God was thought to have created and sustained the wondrous workings of the universe. This belief
told the people all they needed to know about the meaning and purpose of life. Then, scientific
discovery and methods began to undermine religious beliefs. Scientists began to reveal that natural
laws and natural forces governed the world. Opposing beliefs, e.g. the Marxism belief, criticized
Christian views. People like, Bacon, Copernicus, Kepler, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Although science explains much about life and the universe, some people choose to believe religion.
One major reason for the contrast in views is the difference of interpretations of the Bible. Extreme
Christians take the story of Genesis purely literally and believe God created the world in six days,
leaving no room for the arguments of science. Others still believe in the story of Genesis but that
instead of six days, six periods of time. Others, however, completely reject Christianity.
Despite claims that scientific discovery and methods have never really 'challenged' Christian belief,
I personally feel that Christians have responded well to any attacks.
Some Christians firmly believe that the universe has arisen completely through a miraculous act of
God and completely reject scientific theories. This is called 'creationism'. Another attack on
scientific arguments is the 'First Cause' theory introduced by Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas once quoted
that "the universe couldn't have simply sprung from nothing"; therefore, one is forced to reach the
conclusion that it is caused to exist by something. The 'big bang' is not accepted, as this is not
answering what caused this to happen. After a series of questioning, most reach the conclusion of
God.
The Anthropic Principle is a prime example of

The Role Of Nature In The Scarlet Letter
Adultery was and still is one of the most sinful acts one can commit. The Seventh Commandment is
documented in Exodus 20:14: it states " Thou shall not commit adultery"(Bennett np). In the Bible,
adultery is abhorrent in God's view. In ancient Israel, the penalty for this sin was death, which
indicates how ugly of a sin adultery is viewed as (Bennett np). This is expressed in various texts
including The Scarlet Letter, noticed strongly within Pearl's character. Pearl is represented in the text
as something that came from something so ugly but is a pure and beautiful piece of nature. Pearl is
born as a result of sin and some people disagreed believing that she is a way to realize the
consequences and fix the actions. It is evident in The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Similarly to Pearl and Hester, something so radiant came from a sinful act. A rosebush is mentioned
again when Hester and Pearl are visiting the Governor 's house. Pearl wants a rose from the
rosebush she see's in the garden after being denied one she cries. This shows that a pure life is
unattainable for Pearl and Hester because they will forever be followed by the sin. The comparison
between Pearl and the rosebush that is in many chapters allows us to understand Pearl as more of a
passionate person like a rosebush than a result of a crime. Rosebushes have thorns and like Pearl has
flaws it but they are beautiful and pure.
An important part of this novel is placed in the forest. The forest is where Hester and Dimmesdale
meet and talk privately for the first time since the sin was committed. The forest symbolizes an
escape from rules and enters a place where chaos and magic is. This is where Pearl is free from
society and the isolation she experiences because of the rule and judgement in the town. Hester and
Pearl as they are walking through the forest notice gleams of sunshine shining through the clouds
above them. Pearl thinks the sunlight is hiding from Hester because of her sin and the letter she
wears on her chest. Pearl, being an innocent young girl, runs after the sunlight seeking to catch it,
the light disappears from Hester. The light that does not follow Hester represents that her sin follows
her everywhere even in the forest. Pearl says to Hester,

Hannah More and William Wordsworth: Turning Tables for...
Hannah More's "from Strictures on the Modern System of Female Education" and William
Wordsworth's "The Table's Turned; An Evening Scene, on the Same Subject" at first glance appear
unrelated; however, upon further investigation, it is clear that the two works share a common goal:
to inspire their readership to embark on a meaningful educational journey. The two pieces, one
traditionally persuasive, the other traditionally literary, differ in their delivery but converge in their
principles. Both Wordsworth and More seek to change the culture of education in their society. By
placing their pieces in conversation with one another, each author's perspective illuminates in the
other author's piece a message only decipherable through his or her ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
She declares, "But the great object to which you, who are or may be mothers, are more especially
called, is the education of your children" (221). She emphasizes the profound effect that mothers can
have on both their daughters and their sons, and she reminds her reader that children are the future
leaders of both family and government. She declares, "To you is made over the awfully important
trust of infusing the first principles of piety into the tender minds of those who may one day be
called to instruct, not families merely, but districts; to influence, not individuals, but senates" (221).
Women are empowered through their responsibility of instilling moral and educational framework in
their children's minds. However, she argues women cannot provide their children with a lasting
foundation if their gender's educational stores are filled with brittle trifles rather than solid moral
knowledge. While Wordsworth's poem is not gender specific, he too alludes to his discontent with
contemporary educational affairs. He urges his readers, "Up! Up! My Friend, and quit your books"
(l. 1) in order to spur them into action and, more specifically, into nature. Rather than employ books'
"barren leaves" (l. 30) as teachers, Wordsworth urges his readers to accept Nature as their sole
teacher. There is irony in "The Tables Turned" that reveals Wordsworth's belief that all books are not
created equally (Menke). While books "of Science and of Art" (Wordsworth l.

Examples Of Humanity's Sinful Nature And Edmund Pevensie
Humanity's Sinful Nature and Edmund Pevensie
Humanity is a beautiful force of nature, but just as an ocean in beautiful, it is also treacherous.
Human nature is sinful in nature,"No one has to teach a child to lie or be selfish; rather, we go to
great lengths to teach children to tell the truth and put others first. Sinful behavior comes naturally."
("What is the sin nature?", 2017). C.S. Lewis wrote a series of books called The Chronicles of
Narnia and in one of these named "The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe". C.S. Lewis weaves a
wonderful tale about four children collectively called the Pevensie children who find a world unlike
any other inside of a wardrobe. They meet the all powerful Lion, Aslan, that brings awe to their
person. They hear about the White Witch with all of her horrors, and Edmund (one of the children)
even experiences her himself. The children even fight a battle against the forces of evil in their
minds and physically on the battlefield leading to the thrones of Narnia. Through this grand story,
C.S. Lewis wrote in a character very important to the ideas of human nature. Edmund was one of the
Pevensie children and is used in C.S. Lewis's novel as a representation of humanity. C.S. Lewis
presents Edmund as humanity through his foolish blindness to that which is sin, his pride and
jealousy, and his fear of judgement.
Edmund is already a foolish boy by the result of his sinful nature. C.S. Lewis shows us this in the
book when he writes, "He jumped in

Scarlet Letter Nature Quotes
Danish author Hans Christian Andersen once said, "Just living is not enough... one must have
sunshine, freedom, and a little flower." A person should be able to find beauty in nature to truly live
their life. Nature gives symbols for how life happens. Every spring trees comeback to life and every
winter trees "die". Sunshine gives warmth and life to the plants. By being free to live however they
please, plants are given the truth of how life truly is. People have to find nature and believe in the
power of nature to explore life. Just as Hans Christian Andersen believes one should find nature,
Nathaniel Hawthorne believes nature should be shown in The Scarlet Letter. In The Scarlet Letter by
Nathaniel Hawthorne, nature uncovers the truth about ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hester brings up this idea because she has had time away from the town and had no one to guide her
on this path that she took. She does not think about how townspeople are going to perceive her and
Dimmesdale leaving simultaneously. Hester very much resembles the forest because the forest
cannot be tamed. The forest grows how it wants and only stops when others force it to. Hester will
only gain guidance when the town forces her to listen to them. The forest also knows to show who
Hester and Dimmesdale are inside: "Such was the sympathy of Nature–that wild, heathen Nature of
the forest, never subjugated by human law, nor illuminated by higher truth– with the bliss of these
two spirits!" (139). The forest shows the truth about the townspeople. The forest was always dark
around Hester when she had her letter on because of her sin. Hester removes her letter once she and
Dimmesdale confirm that they are going to go to Europe. Once Hester removes her scarlet letter, the
whole forest lights up. Hester has removed the symbol of her wrongdoing because it no longer is a
part of her. Seven years has past and no one in the town remembers what the A stands for anymore.
They believe that it means able because Hester has dedicated her life to making clothes for the
townspeople. She never commits her transgression again and works to make her life good. The
forest reflects who the townspeople are and shows their true self once they realise

Aristotle's Argument of the Polis
In what follows, I shall consider Aristotle's' argument of the polis, or the city–state, as presented in
his Politics I.2, and expound on the philosophical implications of this particular thesis; namely, a
thesis which claims that the city–state exists by nature, and correspondingly, that a human being is
'by nature a political animal'. Along the way, I shall present two objections leveled against each
claim. The first pertains to the invalidity of the argument on ends; specifically, I shall protest that
when a thing's process of coming to be is completed, even if we regard this as an end, this does not
necessarily confer that such an end is a natural end, for artificial processes too, like natural
processes, share the potential to arrive ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I will now focus on each claim and discuss their respective argument in support. First, if all of the
associations prior to the coming to be of the city–state exist by nature, and when a thing's linear
development of coming to be is completed and such is regarded as an end, it must necessarily be
admitted that the city–state as the completed result of an uninterrupted process is a natural end itself;
so, the city–state exists by nature. Aristotle affirms that each association is a natural development in
so far as it emerges from the natural impulse for self–sufficiency, so in achieving its development, it
is clear that such is said to arrive at its nature because of its nature. With regard to Aristotle's
'whole–part' claim, the following can be made explicit: the city–state as a whole is prior to its parts –
namely, human's being human – if and only if it can continue to exist even when any of its parts are
removed; but the human's being human cannot exist in that sense without it. Just as it is essential to
a hands being a hand that it be part of a living human body, for instance, it is similarly essential to a
human's being a human that she or he be part of a city–state; hence, hands are essentially corporeal
in the same sense that human beings are essentially political. In any case, whereas the city–state
continues to exist, the human's being human cannot. So, the whole is prior to its

The Role Of The God's Gardeners
The group of people in the novel, who are called the God's Gardeners, can be ignored as they play a
vital role in the novel. The God's Gardeners are the environmentalist community and interact with
the larger culture. Both Toby and Ren in the novel are taken under the wings of this community.
This God's Gardener group is a religious cult which follows their own culture and rejects other
outside culture to protect both the plants and animals. They are the close knit community that stay
and work together. The basic principle of this community is to value all the creatures that are present
in the world. This community is strictly vegetarian and only eats meat under an emergency
condition. Only organic and homegrown diet that they grow up in the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It like the present is hopeless and only the horrific disaster can bring back the nature. Furthermore,
whoever reads the novel would feel like Atwood raising a question that is what kind of collapse will
be required before something fundamentally new is to spread over the Earth?. God's Gardener lives
with the rebellion against the commodity and the greedy pleasure. In "We're Using Up the Earth. It's
Almost Gone": A Return to the Post–Apocalyptic Future in Margaret Atwood's The Year of the
Flood, J.Brooks Bouson points out that the God's Gardener " also see the need for the cleansing
renewal of humanity and the creation of new social and moral order"(2011,17). God's Gardeners
reconstruct the Biblical stories from the boks of Genesis, Jeremiah and Apocalypse in which God
angry with sinful people, warns humankind:
"So the LORD said, "I will wipe from the face of the earth the human race I have created––and with
them the animals, the birds and the creatures that move along the ground––for I regret that I have
made them."(Genesis

Wk2Assgn
Application
Week 2– Daniel Johnson
Walden University
Children develop quickly at a young age. Young children under the age of six are capable of making
thoughtful decisions about their behavior and environment (Epstein, 2003). They may even try to
explain their behavior to others. In the case of Josh, a three year old boy that I will use for my
observation and assessment project, social skills are still in the process of being developed and he
hasn't begun to really start speaking at this point. After interviewing Josh's parents I was told that
Josh says very few words and doesn't speak at all in sentences. He does, however, include himself
socially with other children and plays easily with them. He understands English and Spanish. His ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Observation Plan Josh's parents are concerned that Josh is developing slower than his peers in the
social development category because of his lack of communication verbally. I explained to his
parents that I will observe his behavior over a few week period in a social setting in the late morning
at the child care center in the gym while the mother is working out. She says that this will be the
best place to observe his behavior in a social setting because there are several other children there
that are the same age as Josh.
The mother states that Josh is alert most of the time. He wakes easily and can go to sleep easily or
stay awake late if the need arises. The parents want to know if he is developing socially at the same
rate as his peers or if they should be watching closer for any signs of special needs. The other
concern that the parents mentioned was regarding Josh being observed. They wanted to make sure
that this would be done without Josh realizing that I was observing him. I assured the parents that he
would not know that he was being observed. I will be looking to see how Josh engages and interacts
with other children in the child care room at the gym. I will see if he tries to speak while he is
playing with them and if he shows any type of aggression or retraction from being around others.
The parents state that Josh will throw things without any warning and for no apparent reason. I tried
to ease their minds by

Essay On Man Vs. Environment In To Build A Fire By Jack...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Kimberly Jones

More from Kimberly Jones (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay On Man Vs. Environment In To Build A Fire By Jack...