Saudi firm inks 100MW Australian solar deal

Copyright © 2015 NewBase www.hawkenergy.net Edited by Khaled Al Awadi – Energy Consultant All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, redistributed,
or otherwise copied without the written permission of the authors. This includes internal distribution. All reasonable endeavours have been used to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this
publication. However, no warranty is given to the accuracy of its content. Page 1
NewBase 26 February 2017 - Issue No. 1004 Senior Editor Eng. Khaled Al Awadi
NewBase For discussion or further details on the news below you may contact us on +971504822502, Dubai, UAE
Saudi energy firm inks deal for Australian solar farm
Arabian business
Fotowatio Renewable Ventures (FRV), a developer of large-scale solar power plants and part of
Saudi-based Abdul Latif Jameel Energy, has signed a power purchase agreement for the Lilyvale
Solar Farm in Queensland, Australia.
The deal with Ergon Energy, the Queensland Government-owned electricity retailer, will see
Ergon Energy purchase 100 percent of the electricity and all large scale renewable energy
certificates (LRECs) generated by FRV's 100MW Lilyvale Solar Farm project.
The agreement will be effective once the solar facility begins operation, expected to be towards
the end of 2018, and run until 2030.
The proposed Lilyvale solar farm is located 50 kilometres North East of Emerald in the
Queensland Central Highlands region, known for its many coal mines and cattle farming industry.
The project’s location near to major existing network infrastructure makes it ideal for connecting
the solar farm to the national electricity grid, FRV said in a statement.
The project received approval in September 2015, with construction set to begin mid-2017 and
expected to take 12-16 months. FRV estimates up to 200 workers will be needed to complete
Lilyvale Solar Farm’s construction. It is expected to power approximtely 45,000 homes.
The announcement is the third power purchase agreement that FRV has signed in Australia within
the last 12 months, following deals with Origin Energy for the Moree Solar Farm in New South
Wales and the Clare Solar Farm, near Ayr in No-rth Queensland. FRV’s Chief Executive Officer,
Rafael Benjumea, said: “FRV continues to demonstrate strong performance in securing long-term
power purchase agreements to underpin its landmark solar power projects in Australia."

UAE: Emirates Transport to supply e-vehicles to finance ministry
The UAE Ministry of Finance (MoF) has signed an agreement with Emirates Transport for supply
of electric-powered vehicles.
The move comes as part of MoF’s commitment to support sustainable energy resources in line
with UAE vision 2021, by using sustainable transport services offered by Emirates Transport-
which contribute to clean energy and provide a healthy and safe environment, said Younis Haji Al
Khoori, the undersecretary of MoF after
signing the deal with Mohammed
Abdullah Al Jarman, the general
manager of Emirates Transport.
Al Khoori pointed out that this was part
of the UAE leadership’s commitment to
diversify energy resources and
encourage adopting renewable
resources to reduce harmful emissions.
"We are working to enhance the
environmental indicator results by
embracing eco-friendly, electric-
powered vehicles. This stems from our
belief in the importance of sustainable
development and our commitment to future generations to provide a clean, healthy and safe
environment," he added.
Al Jarman said the signing of the MoU stems from the ministry’s commitment to achieving
sustainable development. "It also helps in strengthening cooperation and partnership between
Emirates Transport and the ministry," he noted.
He also highlighted MoF’s efforts to achieve the Emirati vision and objectives to diversify energy
resources and encourage dependency on renewable energy to reduce carbon emissions.
Stressing the importance of adopting clean and sustainable energy for a healthy and safe
environment, Al Jarman said:
"We considered this step as a
reflection of the wise
government’s ambitions to
achieve integration between
institutions through joint efforts
between public and private
companies."
"The integration will be key for
supporting initiatives and
projects which achieve
sustainable development,
protect the future generation
and achieve the UAE Vision
2021," he added.-

UAE: ADNOC to boost electric vehicle charging stations
The national - LeAnne Graves
Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (Adnoc) Distribution plans to increase the number of electric
vehicle (EV) charging stations across the emirate to 20 to meet the anticipated rise in petrol-
alternative cars. EVs are expected to make headway in the country after the arrival of American
car maker Tesla earlier this month. Abu Dhabi currently has 12 EV charging stations.
Saeed Al Rashdi, the acting chief executive of Adnoc
Distribution, told The National that it had already
started outfitting its Yas service station with a solar-
powered electric charger, which will use power from
the grid as backup for times when the sun isn’t
shining.
“We are planning to extend the installation of similar
chargers to seven other service stations – the Al
Mushrif, Rabdan, Khalifa City-South, Abu Dhabi
Corniche, Souk Al Batten, Samha-1 and Samha-2,”
he said.
Adnoc has also concluded a joint survey with Tesla on the viability of installing chargers at service
stations but no details have been released. Mr Al Rashdi said: “In view of the potential growth of
electric car and hybrid usage, we are moving ahead with the early development of support
infrastructure for such vehicles.”
While EVs were already in the UAE thanks to companies such as Renault, the debut of Tesla has
resulted in an infrastructure race to meet potential demand. The American car maker opened a
pop-up shop in Dubai Mall, with a Tesla Ranger support and service centre to open in July. The
chief executive, Elon Musk, said that a shop and service centre would also open in Abu Dhabi
next year.
The UAE has at least 85 charging stations, according to research by The National. In addition to
Abu Dhabi’s 12, Dubai has 68 and there are five charging stations in Sharjah, Ras Al Khaimah
and Fujairah.
There are three different types of chargers: AC Level 1 (slow, such as a wall socket), AC Level 2
(medium, between two and four hours) and DC fast charging (fast, less than 30 minutes).
For the slow charging wall socket at a home, UAE users will pay rates based on residential tariffs
set out by the respective utility, the same way powering lights or devices is calculated in monthly
electricity bills.
For a Tesla Model S owner in the capital averaging 20,000 kilometres a year, the annual cost for
charging the battery at home is 10 to 30 per cent less than fuelling a conventional car, ranging
from about Dh281 for a national to Dh1,144 for an expat.
For public charging stations in Abu Dhabi, private entities that own them will determine prices,
according to the Abu Dhabi Distribution Company (ADDC). Potential station owners will need to
contact ADDC so the distributor can confirm viability and inspect facilities.
In Dubai, Dubai Electricity and Water Authority (Dewa) will be in charge of every station, with public charging areas
priced at 29 fils per kilowatt hour. If a Tesla Model S owner only uses Dewa-provided public charging stations, it will
cost about Dh1,088 a year for 20,000km. This is half of what it would cost to fuel a 2017 BMW 5 Series sedan, which
will run about Dh2,000 to Dh3,600 with petrol prices averaging Dh2 per litre.

China’s use of methanol in liquid fuels has grown rapidly since 2000
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, based on Argus Media Group
China is the global leader in methanol use and has recently expanded methanol production
capacity. Since the early 2000s, China’s methanol consumption in fuel products has risen sharply
and is estimated to have been more than 500,000 barrels per day (b/d) in 2016.
EIA commissioned a study from Argus Media group to better understand China’s consumption of
methanol and its derivatives. The estimates developed in the study have now been incorporated
into EIA’s historical data and forecasts of petroleum and other liquids consumption in China.
Methanol, like ethanol, is an alcohol with inherent issues such as its solubility in water and
corrosiveness. Methanol or its derivative products can be added to fuels such as gasoline and
liquefied petroleum gases (LPG). Similar to how ethanol is currently blended into motor gasoline in
the United States, methanol is blended into gasoline in China.
Most of China’s methanol supply is from domestic production. About two-thirds of China’s
methanol feedstock is produced from coal and the remainder from coking gas (a by-product of
steel production) and natural gas. China has abundant coal resources, and for more than a
decade the country has increased its capacity to manufacture methanol using coal as a feedstock.
Smaller amounts of China’s methanol supply are imported from the Middle East, Southeast Asia,
South America, and the United States.
Methanol is a clean-burning, high-octane fuel component, as the oxygen present in methanol aids
in more complete fuel combustion. Blending methanol with gasoline allows refiners to extend
China’s gasoline supply and increase the octane level of its gasoline. However, methanol has only
one-half the energy per unit of volume as gasoline and requires more fuel consumption on a
volumetric basis to provide the same amount of energy.

China’s largest city, Shanghai, and 13 of China’s 23 provinces have approved local standards for
methanol blends ranging from 5% to 100% methanol. China has a national quality standard for
methanol blends of 85%, and a national standard for a 15% blend of methanol in gasoline is
pending approval by the government.
A methanol derivative known as methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) is also blended into gasoline in
China to increase octane levels. Consumption of MTBE and other derivatives in China was
estimated at 230,000 b/d in 2016. Starting in the 1990s, MTBE was used as an oxygenate and
octane enhancer in reformulated gasoline sold in the United States, with domestic production
exceeding 200,000 b/d from 1998 to 2002. However, concerns over groundwater contamination
led an increasing number of states to ban it. Following enactment of provisions of the Energy
Policy Act of 2005 that were interpreted as reducing or eliminating legal defenses available to
MTBE blenders, its use was soon phased out in the United States.
Methanol can also be converted directly to gasoline, and in China this conversion occurs much
less often than the blending of methanol or its derivatives into gasoline. China built its first
methanol-to-gasoline (MTG) plant in 2010, and since then, another 10 MTG plants have come
online. MTG units involve high capital costs and are only cost-competitive when oil prices are
high. Lower oil prices since late 2014 have reduced China’s MTG plant operating rates and have
created uncertainty for investment in new MTG plants.
For blending into liquefied petroleum gases such as propane, China uses methanol to create a
derivative known as dimethyl ether (DME), a compound that has the same molecular formula as
ethanol but a different chemical structure. Despite an official ban on the use of DME in LPG
cylinders, some DME has been blended into LPG delivered to China's residential sector. Over the
past two years, though, two factors—stronger enforcement of the DME ban and lower price
competitiveness of DME relative to LPG—have reduced the level of DME blending.

US: Liquefied natural gas exports expected to drive growth in
U.S. natural gas trade… EIA, Annual Energy Outlook 2017 Interactive Table Viewer
The United States is expected to become a net exporter of natural gas on an average annual
basis by 2018, according to the recently released Annual Energy Outlook 2017 (AEO2017)
Reference case.
The transition to net exporter is driven by declining pipeline imports, growing pipeline exports, and
increasing exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG). In most AEO2017 cases, the United States is
also projected to become a net exporter of total energy in the 2020s in large part because of
increasing natural gas exports.
In 2016, the United States was a net importer of natural gas, with net imports of 0.9 trillion cubic
feet (Tcf), or 2.6 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d). As several LNG export projects currently under
construction are completed, LNG exports are expected to make up a growing share of natural gas
exports and to surpass pipeline exports of natural gas by 2020.
The Sabine Pass facility in Louisiana became the first operating LNG export facility in the Lower
48 states in 2016. By 2021, four LNG export facilities currently under construction are expected to
be completed. Combined, these five plants are expected to have an operational export capacity of
9.2 billion cubic feet per day. After 2021, projected U.S. exports of LNG grow at a more modest
rate as U.S. natural gas faces growing competition from other global LNG suppliers.
U.S. exports of natural gas by pipeline to Mexico are also expected to increase. U.S. exports to
Mexico have doubled since 2009 and are projected to continue rising through at least 2020 as
pipeline projects currently under construction are completed.

U.S. imports of natural gas, most of which come by pipeline from western Canada, are projected
to continue declining. In addition to importing less natural gas from Canada, primarily from Alberta,
increasing amounts of natural gas from the Marcellus and Utica basins in the Northeast and
Midwest regions of the United States are expected to flow to eastern Canadian provinces.
Despite these trends, the United States is expected to remain a net importer of natural gas by
pipeline from Canada through 2040 in all but one case in the AEO2017 analysis. In the High Oil
and Gas Resource and Technology case, higher natural gas production leads to greater exports
of natural gas, and the United States becomes a net exporter of natural gas by pipeline to Canada
by 2030.
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2017 Interactive Table Viewer
The growth of natural gas exports, especially from new LNG terminals, sustains continued growth
in U.S. natural gas production. In the Reference case, natural gas production is projected to grow
through 2020 at about the same rate (3.6% annual average) as it has since 2005, when
production of natural gas from shale formations began to grow rapidly.
After 2020, natural gas production grows at a lower rate (1.0% annual average) in the Reference
case as net export growth moderates, energy efficiencies increase, and natural gas prices slowly
rise.
Natural gas production and trade vary with different assumptions for resources and technology,
macroeconomic growth, and world oil prices. In the High Oil and Gas Resource and Technology
case, larger natural gas resource estimates and improved drilling technology lead to higher

domestic natural gas production, lower U.S. natural gas prices, and therefore, greater natural gas
exports. Most of the increase in natural gas trade is from LNG exports, which grow to 8.4 Tcf (23
Bcf/d) in 2040.
However, LNG exports are highest in a case with high world oil prices. In the High Oil Price case,
when consumers move away from petroleum products when other energy sources become
economically favorable, global LNG demand increases and U.S. LNG exports reach 9.2 Tcf, or 25
Bcf/d. Compared with other LNG suppliers, U.S. LNG has the advantage of domestic spot prices
that are less sensitive to global oil prices.
Conversely, in a scenario with more pessimistic assumptions for oil and gas resources and
technology or a scenario with low world oil prices, LNG exports still increase, but remain below
Reference case levels through 2040.

US:Dream of Offshore U.S Wind Power May Be Too Ugly for Trump
by Joe Ryan and Jennifer A Dlouhy
Offshore wind companies have spent years struggling to convince skeptics that the future of U.S.
energy should include giant windmills at sea. Their job just got a lot harder with the election of
Donald J. Trump.
The Republican president -- who champions fossil fuels and called climate change a hoax -- has
mocked wind farms as ugly, overpriced and deadly to birds. His most virulent criticism targeted an
11-turbine offshore project planned near his Scottish golf resort that he derided as “monstrous.”
Companies trying to build in the U.S., including Dong Energy A/S and Statoil ASA, are hoping to
change Trump’s mind. They plan to argue that installing Washington Monument-sized turbines
along the Atlantic coast will help the president make good on campaign promises by creating
thousands of jobs, boosting domestic manufacturing and restoring U.S. energy independence.
“We are a billion-dollar heavy industry that is set to build, employ and invest,” Nancy Sopko,
director of offshore wind and federal legislative affairs for the industry-funded American Wind
Energy Association, said in an interview. “We have a great story to tell to this administration.”
Significant Stakes
The push to win over the Trump administration comes as offshore wind is on the brink of success
in North America after a decade of false starts. Costs are falling dramatically. Deepwater Wind
LLC completed the first project in U.S. waters in August. And in September, the Obama
administration outlined plans to ease regulatory constraints and take other steps to encourage
private development of enough turbines to crank out 86,000 megawatts by 2050. That’s about the
equivalent of 86 nuclear reactors.

“We are an industry on the rise,” Thomas Brostrom, Dong’s general manager of North America,
said in an interview. “We want very much to come in and explain to the new administration what
we can do for job creation and energy independence.”
A White House spokeswoman did not respond to requests for comment.
The stakes are big. Dong, Statoil, Deepwater and other companies secured a total of 11 leases to
build offshore wind farms. To move forward, developers will need permits from multiple agencies
and, in some instances, federal grants to refurbish ports. For instance, Deepwater’s 30-megawatt
wind farm off Rhode Island benefited from a $22.3 million U.S. Transportation Department grant to
upgrade piers and terminals for use as a staging area.
Talking Points
To be clear, installing turbines at sea requires years of planning, and Trump may be out of office
by the time some developers need federal approvals. State governments, meanwhile, remain the
biggest drivers of renewable energy development, because they can mandate that utilities get a
certain amount of power from offshore wind or other sources.
Nevertheless, offshore developers need a basic level of cooperation in Washington to keep the
nascent industry moving forward. "They don’t want to lose the progress that they’ve made,” said
Frank Maisano, a Washington-based energy specialist for the lobbying firm Bracewell LLP.
Shoring up Trump administration support will require developers to shed climate change talking
points and dispel any notions that offshore wind is an environmental relic of the Obama
administration, said Timothy Fox, an analyst at Washington-based ClearView Energy Partners
LLC. It may help that two of the biggest developers -- Dong and Statoil -- have deep roots in
offshore oil and natural gas.
Jobs will be at the crux their message. Erecting 600-foot (183-meter) turbines along the Eastern
seaboard may boost employment in struggling port towns from South Carolina to Maine,
generating an estimated 31,000 jobs in the Mid-Atlantic alone, according to the National

Renewable Energy Laboratory. And if the industry booms, turbine manufacturers including Vestas
Wind Systems A/S and Siemens AG have said they may open U.S. factories.
Key Figures
"Logically there should be a good match here with the Trump administration," Kit Kennedy, the
Natural Resources Defense Council’s director of energy and transportation, said in an interview.
"We will see if ideology gets in the way."
Persuading the president himself could be challenging. The bare-bones energy plan posted on the
White House website calls for increasing coal, oil and gas production -- but makes no mention of
wind or other forms of clean energy. Trump in 2012 tweeted: “Not only are wind farms disgusting
looking, but even worse they are bad for people’s health.”
Ultimately it’s unclear whether Trump’s 140-character appraisals of wind energy will translate into
U.S. policy, or if they were simply reactions to windmills potentially spoiling views from his golf
course in Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Either way, the commander-in-chief’s personal support may
not be crucial for developers in the U.S.
The key figures for offshore wind companies to persuade are deputy secretaries, directors and
others within the Interior and Energy departments. A central player is the yet-to-be-named director
of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, an Interior Department agency responsible for
granting leases to offshore oil, gas and wind developers.
Potential Allies
The industry may already have a few key allies. Rick Perry, Trump’s proposed energy secretary,
oversaw a record expansion of wind energy during his time as Texas governor. And at least one
high-ranking official who has supported offshore wind at the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management -- Acting Director Walter Cruickshank -- remains in place.
The most important business stories of the day.
Trump’s rise to power does not appear to have curbed offshore wind developers’ enthusiasm
about the U.S. market. Weeks after the election, Norway’s Statoil paid a record $42.5 million for a
lease to develop a site off the coast of New York. And at least nine companies -- including a unit
of oil giant Royal Dutch Shell Plc. -- have qualified to bid next month for a lease to build off North
Carolina.
“There is a misconception that wind energy is all driven by climate change,” said Danish
ambassador Lars Gert Lose, who is helping Fredericia, Denmark,-based Dong with lobbying
efforts. “But this is a very competitive industry.”

NewBase 26 February 2017 Khaled Al Awadi
NewBase For discussion or further details on the news below you may contact us on +971504822502 , Dubai , UAE
Oil prices settles at $53.99 & $56.00, ending the week higher as
OPEC cuts offset rising US supply
Reuters + NewBase
Oil prices fell on Friday on concerns over rising U.S. supplies and as traders begin to pull out
crude barrels from pricey storage.
Book squaring ahead of the weekend and ahead of upcoming Feb. 28 expirations in Brent
futures for April delivery, heating oil for March delivery, and March RBOB gasoline, also pressured
prices, analysts and traders said.
U.S. West Texas Intermediate settled down 46 cents at $53.99 a barrel, ending the week's trade
1.1 percent higher.
Benchmark Brent crude oil was down 58 cents at $56 a barrel by 2:35 p.m. ET (1935 GMT). The
contract was on pace for a slight weekly gain.
The latest sign of renewed U.S. production came on Friday after oilfield service firm Baker Hughes
reported its weekly count of U.S. oil rigs topped 600 for the first time since October, 2015. Last
week, drillers added 5 oil rigs.
U.S. crude stocks rose by 564,000 barrels in the week to Feb. 17, the Energy Information
Administration reported Thursday, although the gain was below analysts' expectations for an
increase of 3.5 million barrels.
Oil price special
coverage

But prices have been supported and trading in a tight $4-5 range since November when
the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and other producers agreed to cut
production.
"The oil market remains focused on the global rebalancing act, with attention centered on OPEC
compliance and U.S. production growth," said Michael Tran, director of energy strategy at RBC
Capital Markets in New York.
"The push-pull situation between stock draws relative to price-elastic U.S. shale remains
paramount to the rebalance."
OPEC has so far surprised the market by showing record compliance with the deal and could do
so further in coming months as the biggest laggards - the United Arab Emirates and Iraq - pledge
to catch up quickly with their targets.
OPEC's average compliance is put by the International Energy Agency at a record 90 percent in
January, and based on a Reuters average of production surveys, it stands at 88 percent.
However, exports from the United States, which is not part of the deal, hit a record high of 1.2
million barrels per day (bpd) last week and production rose to above 9 million bpd, the highest
since April, the U.S. Energy Administration Agency said.
Meanwhile, traders are turning the spigots to drain the priciest U.S. storage tanks and selling oil
held in tankers anchored off Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia as the rising price of oil for near-
term delivery erodes the profits to be had by holding onto oil for later sale.
Analysts at LBBW said that the continued growth in U.S. production and oil prices that look to
have reached a technical ceiling have led them to cut their year-end Brent price forecast by $5 to
$55 a barrel.
"Most market participants realize that the good news from OPEC seems to be priced in; therefore,
and because of the shale comeback (in the U.S.), we reduced our forecast," said LBBW oil analyst
Frank Klumpp.

Oil Slips From 19-Month High as Ample Supply Offsets OPEC Cuts
Blomberg Mark Shenk
Oil retreated from the highest close since July 2015 in New York as record U.S. crude inventories
offset OPEC production curbs.
Futures dropped 0.8 percent. U.S. government data showed stockpiles rose 564,000 barrels to
518.7 million last week, the highest level in weekly data going back to 1982. Still, it was the
smallest gain this year and coincided with a drop in imports. The slowdown in the expansion may
signal the output cuts by Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries are starting to tighten
supplies globally.
"It took a while, but there’s a realization that we have all-time, record storage and the market is
reacting accordingly," Bob Yawger, director of the futures division at Mizuho Securities USA Inc. in
New York, said by telephone.
Analysts from Goldman Sachs Group Inc. to Energy Aspects Ltd. have said U.S. stockpiles were
boosted by deliveries purchased before oil producers started cutting output in January. While the
supply gain, which has kept prices in a tight range above $50 this year, slowed last week,
Citigroup Inc. says the glut OPEC created by boosting production prior to the deal means they will
need to prolong their cuts beyond June.
West Texas Intermediate for April delivery fell 46 cents to close at $53.99 a barrel on the New
York Mercantile Exchange. Prices rose to $54.45 on Thursday, the highest settlement since July
2, 2015. Total volume traded was about 36 percent below the 100-day average. Front-month
futures advanced 1.1 percent this week.
Brent for April settlement dropped 59 cents, or 1 percent, to $55.99 a barrel on the London-based
ICE Futures Europe exchange. The contract climbed 0.3 percent this week. The global benchmark
crude closed at a $2 premium to WTI.

Imports Tumble
U.S. crude imports fell 14 percent to an average 7.29 million barrels a day for the week ended
Feb. 17, according to preliminary EIA data. Oil exports from the world’s biggest economy surged
to a record and domestic production rose to 9 million barrels a day last week. American explorers
boosted the oil rig count by five to 602 this week, the highest number since October 2015,
according to Baker Hughes Inc.
"The rig count continues to go up and the U.S. continues to pump more," Mark Watkins, the Park
City, Utah-based regional investment manager for the Private Client Group at U.S. Bank, which
oversees $136 billion in assets, said by telephone. "At the same time OPEC has been pretty
diligent about pulling barrels."
OPEC and its partners achieved 86 percent of their agreed cuts last month, according to a
statement on its website. The group’s Joint Technical Committee decided that producers “are on
the right track towards full conformity” with supply cuts.

NewBase Special Coverage
News Agencies News Release 26 Feb. 2017
Losing 4.3 Billion Barrels Is Good For Exxon
By Liam Denning
There's no denying that having almost one in five barrels of oil equivalent of your proved reserves
slip off the books, as Exxon announced this week, isn't the company's finest hour.Coming just
after Exxon took a $2 billion asset impairment, it looks like newly appointed secretary of state Rex
Tillerson has left his successor as CEO some fixing to do.
Still, this is Exxon, and a big chunk of those lost reserves are still there in physical terms. It's just
that, for example, the 3.5 billion barrels in the Kearl oil-sands operation in Canada no longer meet
the SEC's criteria for being economic to produce anytime soon, chiefly because oil prices have
collapsed (see this column from last year for more details on this).
Sandstorm
Trailing Canadian oil prices ended 2016 at $30, down 58 percent from two years ago
Note: Trailing 12-month averages.
So, as Exxon points out in its 10-K filing, higher prices could push those reserves back onto the
books.

But even if the physical barrels are there, it's clear that reserves replacement, once a badge of
honor for Exxon, has become a millstone. Here is how Exxon's reserves replacement fared
cumulatively over the past decade, roughly coinciding with Tillerson's tenure as CEO:
Rise And Fall
Buying XTO Energy boosted Exxon's reserves replacement ratio but subsequent debooking sent it
back down
Note: Cumulative reserves replacement over time. Reserves replacement equals net change in
proved reserves divided by production.
The importance of acquisitions to keeping that ratio aloft becomes clearer once you strip them out
(along with disposals):
Evaporating
Exxon's low organic reserves replacement in natural gas has been chronic, while progress in
liquids was wiped out by the latest debooking.
Note: Cumulative organic reserves replacement. Calculated as net additions to proved reserves
from revisions, improved recovery, extensions and discoveries, divided by production.
Tillerson chased the next big thing with his deals for XTO Energy Inc., which was badly timed, and
in Russia, which suffered some bad geopolitical luck.

Overall, Exxon's reserves and production were actually lower in 2016 than in 2007, despite a
string of growth targets set each year during most of the past decade. Even with lower output,
reserves now cover only 13.1 years of production, down from 14.2 years in 2007 and a high of
16.9 in 2014.
Meanwhile, return on average capital employed -- again, a metric Exxon long favored as a
measure of discipline -- in the dominant upstream division has fallen from 41.7 percent in 2007 to
just 0.1 percent last year. And Standard & Poor's cited specifically the challenge of replacing
Exxon's huge production when it cut the company's triple-A credit rating last year.
It is time for a reset.
The root of the problem for Exxon, and the rest of Big Oil, is an obsession with bigness. Focusing
on finding ever more barrels, in ever more challenging places, led companies to invest awesome
sums in new projects at the height of the boom, precisely when industry and asset inflation
gave each buck progressively less bang. Doug Terreson, who covers the majors for Evercore ISI,
summed it up in a report last October:
Investors correctly point to the $380 [billion] rise in capital employed but only a $140
[billion] increase in market value during 2008-2014 even before oil prices declined (Brent @
$100). Because companies did not heed the imbalance between capital formation and
competitively advantaged investment opportunities and mistakenly equated volume for
value, capital became stranded in unproductive areas.
In other words, like a tech investor in the late 1990s or a house-flipper in 2007, the majors lost
their heads.
One reason they did was an expectation that oil demand and prices would only go up and to the
right. If a combination of Chinese thirst and OPEC restraint (or dysfunction) were going to ensure
triple-digit oil forever, then even high-cost endeavors like oil sands met the investment threshold.
As is now painfully obvious, an unexpected shale boom and existential questions about long-term
demand for oil have cast considerable doubt on that view. Here, for example, is how the average
economics of new oil-sands projects compare with North America's shale basins:

For the majors as a whole, there has been a growing disconnect between promises of ever-
increasing dividends and bloated costs and capital expenditure budgets that swallow up cash but
don't deliver higher production or decent reserves replacement. About half of Exxon's projects
slated for 2018 onward, as detailed in its financial and operating review for 2015, consist of oil
sands and liquefied natural gas, neither of which look great absent a sustained increase in oil
prices.
Exxon has scored some successes in exploration of late, notably in Guyana, and has been buying
its way into the Permian shale basin. It has also toned down its growth projections. These are
good steps.
Exxon needs more, though. While its traditional premium to its peers has faltered somewhat of
late, the stock remains relatively expensive, especially in light of the slide in return on capital:
Still Exxpensive
Exxon's aura has dimmed but it still commands a premium of 55 percent over its peers
Given much of that premium rests on Exxon's reliability, it shouldn't be taken for granted. After all,
instead of owning Exxon, investors could instead own a basket of rivals such as Pioneer Natural
Resources Co., Suncor Energy Inc., Valero Energy Corp. -- and maybe, within a year or so, even
a bit of Big Big Oil, courtesy of Saudi Aramco's planned IPO.
So when Tillerson's successor Darren Woods takes the podium next week for his first Exxon
analyst day as CEO, he should emphasize a decisive break with the past decade.Committing to
keeping capital expenditure flat for the next few years would be one element of this, at least after
the 14 percent jump Exxon has already indicated for this year.
As ever, M&A is a tool Exxon can use (especially with that relatively highly valued stock as a potential
currency). That doesn't mean mega-deals, especially now that the recovery in oil prices has lifted the
price of most big, needle-moving E&P targets. But it could mean pulling back in certain traditional areas like
oil sands, swapping or monetizing them to expand in assets with better economics or more flexible
production, such as more shale.
Above all, this should form part of a broader message: that being big is no longer the biggest idea out
there. Access to profitable production providing cash for distributions, rather than reserves and growth per
se, is what counts -- even if it means being flexible on traditionally non-negotiable things like, say, formal
ownership of reserves.Exploring such options, at least, is warranted. Exxon's new chief shouldn't let a good
setback go to waste.

NewBase For discussion or further details on the news below you may contact us on +971504822502, Dubai, UAE
Your partner in Energy Services
NewBase energy news is produced daily (Sunday to Thursday) and
sponsored by Hawk Energy Service – Dubai, UAE.
For additional free subscription emails please contact Hawk Energy
Khaled Malallah Al Awadi,
Energy Consultant
MS & BS Mechanical Engineering (HON), USA
Emarat member since 1990
ASME member since 1995
Hawk Energy member 2010
Mobile: +97150-4822502
khdmohd@hawkenergy.net
khdmohd@hotmail.com
Khaled Al Awadi is a UAE National with a total of 25 years of experience in
the Oil & Gas sector. Currently working as Technical Affairs Specialist for
Emirates General Petroleum Corp. “Emarat“ with external voluntary Energy
consultation for the GCC area via Hawk Energy Service as a UAE
operations base , Most of the experience were spent as the Gas Operations
Manager in Emarat , responsible for Emarat Gas Pipeline Network Facility &
gas compressor stations . Through the years, he has developed great
experiences in the designing & constructing of gas pipelines, gas metering &
regulating stations and in the engineering of supply routes. Many years were spent drafting, &
compiling gas transportation, operation & maintenance agreements along with many MOUs for the
local authorities. He has become a reference for many of the Oil & Gas Conferences held in the
UAE and Energy program broadcasted internationally, via GCC leading satellite Channels.
NewBase : For discussion or further details on the news above you may contact us on +971504822502 , Dubai , UAE
NewBase February 2017 K. Al Awadi

Hilton hotel 1B AZADLIG AVENUE, BAKU, AZ1000, AZERBAIJAN
Please send your request by email at info@oil-gas.org, or call +994 55 5993345
About Summit
Azerbaijan Oil and Gas Summit will host by FA Events. Summit will cover main oil and gas topics
and latest trends. The Summit will gather main market key players and experts around globe.
Social Networking Contact
• Address: Jafar Jabbarli str., 44. Caspian Plaza. Baku, Azerbaijan. AZ1065 Baku Azerbaijan
• Contact Us: +994 55 599 33 45
• Email: info@oil-gas.org
The Oil and Gas Summit

Saudi firm inks 100MW Australian solar deal

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Saudi firm inks 100MW Australian solar deal

Similar to Saudi firm inks 100MW Australian solar deal (20)

More from Khaled Al Awadi

More from Khaled Al Awadi (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Saudi firm inks 100MW Australian solar deal