How Did Guernica Change

How Did Guernica Change
"Guernica" is named after a village in Spain. In 1937, Picasso got his inspiration for creating this
painting after Guernica was bombed by German and Italian planes. Thousands of deadly bombs
were dropped over Guernica that left this small village in ruins. Thousands of people were killed and
injured. And the fires created by the bombs destroyed 70 percent of Guernica.
Prior to the bombing of Guernica, Picasso was in the process of creating another piece of art for the
Paris Exhibition, but after hearing the horrific news about the bombing of Guernica, Picasso
changed his course, and started working on a new mural titled "Guernica." Guernica was ordered by
the Republic of Spain. Picasso's painting demonstrates his interpretation of the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Curtis Lemay's Strategic Bombing Analysis
The responsibility of dropping the bombs rests on the shoulders of a President Truman, an
inequivalent President filling the void of the late Franklin D. Roosevelt. Truman fresh into office
heard the various arguments from the military officers, political advisors, scientist, and civilian
experts lobbying for their input to be heard in the debate on the decision to use nuclear bombs
against Japan in the summer of 1945. After the fall of Nazi Germany in May 1945 the Joint Chiefs
of Staff, JCS, predicted that Japan would fall in an additional 18– months of war. The various
branches of the military had competing arguments for the best way to end the war in the Pacific. The
Navy argued that their sea blockade of the Japan along with sea and air bombardments would
strangle Japan into surrender without the need for an ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Due to the poor weather and technological limitations reduced the ability for limited targets over
Japan, thus LeMay was forced to adopt low altitude night area bombing tactics (Oxford – 87).
LeMay's strategic bombing used incendiary bombs, because they were more effected on the
Japanese traditionally wooden structures. Curtis Lemay's firebombing tactics destroyed 60 Japanese
cities bombing (Oxford 87). For the Common Defense quotes the USAAF explanation of the 1945
air campaign, "there are no civilians in Japan. We are making War and making it in the all–out
fashion which saves American lives, shortens the agony which War is, and seeks to bring about an
enduring Peace. We intend to seek out and destroy the enemy wherever he or she is, in the greatest
possible numbers, in the shortest possible time (431)". Air Corps leaders worried only when
bombing threatened their public image, but their goal of the destruction of Japan was clear (Oxford
–

The Problem Of Total Joint Force
The problem the total Joint Force (JF) 2025 will face will be consistent emerging "gray zone"
threats that include hybrid and near peer competitors trying to tip the balance in the global security
environment. In addition, as the Department of Defense (DOD) learned from past wars while its
resources reduce, the total JF 2025 must adapt and become more agile in countering these emerging
threats. The DOD has provided the strategic and military guidance along with associated posturing
statements for the complementary capabilities of strategic adaptability and agility that will enable
the rebalancing of the total JF 2025, support future contingency operations, and mitigate risk.
Recently General Dunford stated, "a ready JF is one that can effectively meet the steady–state
requirements of the combatant commanders, deter our adversaries, and respond decisively in the
event of a contingency." The total JF in 2025 will need to adapt and become more agile faster than
these emerging threats. It will also need to continue deterring global adversaries if it wants to sustain
enduring strategic and operational success while remaining decisive in supporting the national
defense strategy.
The DOD has released multiple documents since 2012 in support of developing its defense strategy.
First, the 2012 Defense Strategic Guidance and 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review, established
priorities that included, "rebalance to the Asia–Pacific region, maintain security in Europe and the
Middle East;

Interwar: Air Power Theory
For more than a century, mankind has occupied all three domains of this earth; subsequently, the
realm of warfare has expanded into the three dimensions progressively with the conquering of land,
sea, and ultimately the air. With the advent of functional airplanes at the beginning of the last
century, powered, sustained, and controlled flight was achieved during the inaugural flight of Orville
and Wilbur Wright in 1903, fulfilling a dream that had occupied the minds of man for more than
millennia. As with all technological advancements, mankind is quick to integrate it into the art of
war; accordingly, the inception of the airplane would serve both civilian and military applications.
While the implications of the airplane on warfare ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Through an examination of problems faced by these various airpower theories and how they went
wrong, this essay will demonstrate, that contrary to predictions by inter–war airpower theorists,
airpower did not become the predominant military force of the Second World War. In an attempt to
better understand airpower and it influence on the art of war, let us examine Phillip S. Meilinger's
definition:
Airpower is the ability to project power or influence through the medium of the air or space to
achieve strategic, operational or tactical objectives. It encompasses military, commercial and civil
aviation, the industrial infrastructure to build it, and a doctrine of employment.
It is in this definition of airpower that we can recognize the dynamic nature of airpower; therefore,
we can discern the requirement for early airpower theorist to conceptualize and prophesize airpower
for future use. In an effort to lobby for the development and use of airpower strategy, airpower
theorist established early theories that were essentially unproven in war, as they were not put into
action until the Second World War, which proved to be a completely different war from the former
all three dimensions of war. In the First World War, airpower served subordinate aims to land
warfare, whereas it served in an attack role in the tactical support of ground forces in which the guns
and bombs of

How Does Warfare Effect People's Life?
When looking at all four sources, the proposition that warfare caused hardship for civilians is
definitely true as it destroyed housing structures along with daily items and other services.
Warfare destroyed the houses of civilians and in the process made life extremely difficult. This is a
statement endorsed by all four of the sources. Because the bombs destroyed civilians houses, the
residents would spend most of their time rebuilding and cleaning up mess, giving them precious
little time to do other things. This is what source 2 tells us when it says, "everyone seems intent only
on patching roofs [and] propping up walls", suggesting that the civilians would slave away all day
repairing housing just for them to be destroyed again by the next bombing raid. Source 3 also says
much the same thing as when it says, "Little children collected wood from the ruins for cooking", it
seems to imply endless amounts of rubble. Along with sources 2 and 3 we also can see in sources 1
and 4 that houses were destroyed. In ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When Source 2 says, "These...raids are intended to...[break] the German moral...Indeed they are
having the contrary effect" it shows that although many hardships were faced, they only effected the
civilians to an extent and source 2 also tells us that "people are being extraordinarily friendly and
helpful to one another" meaning that the people of WWII were a resilient bunch who never put their
heads down even among such hardships as these.
In conclusion, the proposition that warfare caused hardship for civilian is very true as some civilians
had to cope with no house, no running water, no lighting, no fire and no public services. If in doubt
that the people of WWII suffered incredible hardship, then Source 2 confirms it as it plainly states
that there was hardship by saying "Amidst such suffering and

Nazi Propaganda, Myths, And Common Stories Essay
Between February 13, 1945 and February 15, 1945, the German city of Dresden was decimated by
Allied bombers. The bombing run, carried out by the RAF and USAAF, raised ethical and moral
debates because the city was neither a industrial nor a political center contributing to the Nazi war
effort. In order to determine the underlying motives behind the Allied attack and the extent to which
the attack was justified, the investigation will analyze Nazi propaganda, myths, and common stories
in response to the attack, the Yalta Conference in February 1945 with events in the winter of 1945
leading up to the attack, and the impact of the attack on the German war efforts. Word Count: 213
Section B: Summary of Evidence The Bombing Allies utilized area bombing techniques to target
Dresden by indiscriminately dropping incendiary bombs, causing civilian causalities. On the
evening of February 13, 1945, 800 British RAF bombers indiscriminately delivered 1,400 tons of
high explosive bombs and 1,100 tons of incendiaries on Dresden. The Allies pointed out that unless
Dresden was bombed, the Germans could route rail traffic through Dresden to compensate for any
damage caused to Berlin and Leipzig. Nazi Propaganda German Reich Minister of Propaganda
Joseph Goebbels hoped to elicit sympathy through global media outlets. Following the attack,
intentionally dispersed false information regarding the bombing to elicit sympathy for the German
war effort. Germany

Allied Strategic Bombing Analysis
Strategic bombing is a military strategy used in total war, deployed with the goal of defeating the
enemy, by destroying their morale or their economic ability to produce and transport material to the
theatres of military operations. The four areas in which the significance of Allied strategic bombing
will be assessed are: economic, diplomacy, morale and the effect it had on the fighting fronts in
Europe.
The First area of strategic bombing to be assessed is the effect it had on scattering the German
military from their posted Fronts and the destruction of the Luftwaffe. The bombing raids on
Germany drew defenses that were positioned on the Eastern Front and in other areas to try and
counter the incoming Allie aircraft. German anti–tank defenses ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It was only due to the collaboration between the British, the Russians and US; the third Front could
be created. The third front tightened the relationship between the Allie countries and from then was
able to work together in attempts to defeat the Nazis regime. Strategic bombing was only instigated
because Churchill, who was already a major supporter of bombing, and Roosevelt did not want to
re–create the horrors from bombing civilians in the form of terror bombing from World War two. As
well Stalin wanted a third front to keep pressured, menacing attacks on Germany, so a new front
enabled a workload shift from the Russians to the rest of the Allies air force. The Casablanca
conference, 21 January 1943 was a turning point in the effectiveness of allied bombing against
Germany. At Casablanca, Churchill and Roosevelt agreed to give the heaviest bombing offensive
against the German war machine. The combined leaders issued an order to the air forces to bring
about the destruction and dislocation of the German Military, industrial and economic system and
the undermining of the morale. This was done by the technique called "Unconditional Surrender."
This means that the winner of the war is eligible to control the enemies' land and borders, and the
defeated is given nothing. Diplomacy was the factor that controlled the bombing raids through the
war. This increased the significance of bombing for

Gin Lane Analysis
Colorless Appeal According to Artlex, there is no set definition of death; "More difficult than
defining death can be coming to terms with it when others die..." "Guernica" by Pablo Picasso, and
"Gin Lane" by William Hogarth have the similar motif of death. "Guernica" portrays this in its
depiction of war, while "Gin Lane" showcases the lethal effects of alcoholism. Aside from theme,
color symbolism is vital in the analysis of the artwork. The artist's color usage gives the audience a
glimpse into the emotions and tone behind the piece. Both pieces are representations of death in
response to political issues by focusing on the context of the artwork rather than visual appeal. The
explicit images of death in both "Guernica" and "Gin Lane" relate to both work's lack of color.
Picasso's painting "Guernica" was a reaction piece influenced by the Spanish Civil War. According
to the UK's History Learning Site, German forces bombed the small town of Guernica killing 1,654
civilians and wounding 889. In the painting itself, there is an absence of color; it's strictly black,
white and grey. These three colors are symbolic of death, anger, sadness, innocence, peace, and
conservative. The colors also embody the emotions during the bombing and of Picasso himself
because of the 1,654 deaths ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Shabi's article entitled, "Guernica: Meaning Analysis & Interpretation of Painting by Pablo Picasso"
he quotes Picasso, "My whole life as an artist has been nothing more than a continuous struggle
against reaction and the death of art." Picasso also has another painting entitled, "The Old Guitarist".
According to Pablopicasso.org, a website dedicated to the artwork and style of Picasso, this painting
was painted after the suicide of Picasso's close friend. This painting also depicts death, however the
color scheme of blues and greys are present. Blue is symbolic of mourning, and depression. Despite
the lack of color in "Guernica" the unequivocal images of death alone appeal to

What Happened During The Industrial Revolution
The Industrial Revolution started in Brittan in the 18th century, it began when factories were
introduced. The factories increased food production, which allowed Brittan to feed more people at a
lower cost. Many of the factories owners would have children work in the factories because they
were young and easily manipulated. Many people argue that the factories did not affect the health of
the workers, and that any child could get sick or injured even if they were not working in a factory.
However they fail to realize what pain and hardship the workers go threw and when inspectors or
doctors come to visit the workers r cleaned and ordered to lie about the conditions about their
working environment. Michael Ward, a doctor in Manchester, shared his experiences examining the
workers of the factories. He claims that, "we could not remain ten minuets in the factory without
grasping for breath." This shows that if he can barely be able to breath in the factory imagine the
workers who are in their all the time. He also acknowledges that, "They are really nurseries of
disease and vice." Injuries were common from the big machines and also because the workers were
together for the majority of the day diseases would easily spread. Edward Holme, who was another
doctor in Manchester, had a different opinion on the health of the factory workers. He was hired by a
factory owner to come and exam the employs. From his examination 90% were in good health, but
the owner of the factory most likely cleaned the children and made them seem better off that they ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Michael, a surgeon, had many cases of children injured by the machinery. Some of the most
common injures were, "children's hands and arms having been caught in the machinery; in many
other instances the muscles, and the skin is stripped down to the bone." This shows that the factories
were indeed dangerous and not healthy for the

Strategic Bombing Essay
STRATEGIC BOMBING Strategic bombing is considered one necessity for a nation's air force to
visualize air supremacy during World War I and World War II. Strategic bombing is defined as
"striking deep into enemy territory to destroy war–making capabilities." Many theorists speculated
different ideas on strategic bombing, including Trenchard, Douhet, and Gorrell. Trenchard's strategic
bomb theory was to focus more on attacking German homelands and to target the enemy nation's
morale. Next, Douhet's theory is based on Total War Concept and targeted German infrastructures.
Lastly, Gorrell's theory using strategic bombs was to mainly focus on one German city at a time.
From WWI, The German Bombing of Britain and the Allied Bombing of Germany ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Luftwaffe (German Air Force) had started to attack Europe's nations including Poland,
Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium and France to gain air superiority, cut supply lines, and
to support ground forces. Although Britain stood alone to fight against Germany against the
Blitzkrieg, Britain still managed to emerge victorious due to their flexibility and versatility: they had
excellent command, control, and communication skills which let them endure Germany's four stages
of attacks. The Luftwaffe's defeat became probable when they were not trained or equipped for
strategic bombing and had poor intelligence capabilities. Next, as the U.S. entered the war, relations
with Germany and Japan plummeted which allowed them to quickly strategize what objective needs
to be prioritized first. The first priority was to safeguard Britain and the U.S. The second was to
fight a decisive air offense against the Axis powers in Europe and fight defensively in Asia. Lastly,
the third priority was to sustain air offense against Japan after the Axis powers were defeated in
Europe. This showed that even under pressure and tension between other countries, the Allied forces
still managed to coordinate their plans and execute without hesitation. They successfully warded off
the enemy and

General Curtis Lemay : An Effective Leader And Problem Solver
General Curtis LeMay is one of the iconic figures of the United States Air Force. A war hero and
experimented pilot, he was able to succeed where many others failed and his triumphs underpinned
the emergence of the independent Air Force. However, his leadership case presents examples of
virtues and limitations that warriors can experiment during their careers. LeMay was the product of
his era, an effective problem solver for the war devoted to the defense of his country and an
advocate of the massive use of force. His believes affected him when the great powers competed in
the Cold War and he failed to adapt to the new environment. This essay discusses his case using the
lenses of moral courage and emotional intelligence in order to learn ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In fact, it can be considered that could result in a depletion of his combat power. However, his
excellent background as a navigator and pilot gave him freedom of action from his chain of
command, and his reasoning was convincing. Besides, he took the lead position to test his tactics
and inspire his airmen.
LeMay's tactics were bold but also resulted from experience: it was necessary a straight and level
run to the release point to align the target in the sight for optimum accuracy. During the flight, the
aircraft were in a close and staggered formation to get the more coverage from their guns against
attacking fighters. It was acceptable to take some losses and put bombs on target instead of returning
to attack again. Moreover, if there were no need to repeat the attack, less Americans would have to
risk their lives. Ultimately, this matched his priorities of mission accomplishment with the
protection of his men. His morale courage resulted in his group putting more bombs on target with
fewer losses than other groups. After his successful bombing raids over France and Germany, he
tested his methods again in other theater of war.
LeMay's toughts on the protracted and bloody war against Japan were purely realists "It was a long
drawn out war. You began to get casualties from the side effects–the exhaustion, deprivation, disease
and things of

Allied Strategic Bombing
Allied strategic bombing of Germany during the Second World War was, in the main, significant.
The key themes to be looked at in this essay are the effects that Allied Strategic Bombing had on the
dislocation and demoralisation of German civilians; Germany's economic ability to produce and
transport goods for the war effort; other key aspects of the war and the German war effort and,
finally, its impact on the USSR. The evidence of the effectiveness of Allied Strategic Bombing of
Germany strongly suggests that it became more significant throughout the war, especially after the
first one thousand bomber raid on Cologne in May 1942, and although not decisive on its own, was
significant in the final outcome of the Second World War.
One element ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Whilst the significance that it had on the German home front may have been more limited than
hoped for, it succeeded in dislocating and demoralising German civilians. Whilst its effect on
Germany's economic ability to produce and transport goods for the war effort may have been mostly
limited, its effect on the transport infrastructure of German was of critical significance. Perhaps the
most significant effect was bombing's impact on other areas of the war and the German war effort
because of how it saved thousands of potential casualties and facilitated the D–Day landings. Its
impact on the USSR in terms of both keeping them as an ally and easing their invasion was also of
great significance. The overall outcome from Allied Strategic Bombing may have been highly
significant, but we must not fail to neglect the cost at which such a result came. 44.4% of Bomber
Command crews failed to return from their missions (55,573) and over 18000 were wounded or
became prisoners of war. 8,325 aircraft were lost and 1,030,500 tons of bombs were dropped.
Despite the cost at which Allied Strategic Bombing came at, the evidence supports the argument that
the Allied Strategic Bombing of Germany during the Second World War was significant to a large

Strategic Bombing During World War II
World War II began September 1, 1939, the day after Germany invaded neutral Poland. Great
Britain and France declared war on Germany the two days after the invasion. Throughout the war
the bombing of major cities was practiced by both the allies and axis powers. The British and
Americans came up with a more accurate and effective bombing tactics. This tactic is called
"strategic bombing". Strategic bombing was sustained aerial attack on railways, harbours, cities,
workers' housing, and industrial districts in enemy territory The United States and Britain had
justified reasons for the aerial bombings of German and Japanese cities as they were trying to
protect their people from a ruthless dictator. Before the British began bombing the Germans ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These bombing had no purpose except to terrorize Japan into surrendering. The bombings took place
towards the ending months of WWII and had killed about 100,000 people and wiped out about half
the city. "The US military had waited for a clear and windy night to inflict maximum damage, and
on March 9, 1945 the conditions were perfect. Three hundred B29 bombers dropped nearly 500,000
cylinders of napalm and petroleum jelly on the most densely populated areas of Tokyo" (Carney).
This raid also known as Operation Meetinghouse is considered the most destructive bombing ever.
If the Allies had lost the war they would have had severe repercussions and would have been
charged with war

Allies Bombing Campaign Analysis
This essay will consider four key aspects in order to conclude the significance of the Allies strategic
bombing campaign. While the military impact of the campaign is ultimately the most important
factor, political, economic and social impacts also play key roles. The essay will review the political
situation throughout the campaign. The military impact of the bombing is then analysed followed by
the economic and social costs. The essay will evaluate the bombing campaign's contribution to the
overall war effort.
The political significance for the Allies' of the bombing campaign cannot be overstated. After the
British armies retreated from Dunkirk, the only way that the British government could show their
people that they were taking the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was because the bombing was not accurate enough in order to cause much damage to the
targeted areas. This meant that the repair rate for the German economy far outstripped the
destruction rate caused by the Allied bombs. However, this changed when Churchill ordered an
offensive specifically targeting industrial areas in the Summer of 1940. The directive of the
campaign was to 'bring about the progressive destruction and dislocation of the military, industrial
and economic system'. That meant that Bomber Command's main focus was the industrial and
economic centres of Germany. Once the Allies where able to bring effective attacks against
industrial areas, the Germans where unable to repair all the damaged infrastructure in a timely
manner. This tactic of attacking economic areas came to the fore with the Operation 'Gomorrah', the
attack on Hamburg that caused citywide devastation. The German Armaments Minister Speer said,
'six more Hamburgs will end the war.' That statement shows that by July 1943, the German economy
was already feeling the strain from near–continuous bombing raids. Steel production fell by 200,000
tons in the second quarter of 1943. After the previously mentioned raid against the ball–bearing
factory in Schweinfurt, the output of that factory was reduced by 67%. In May 1944, with the switch
to attacking the

Reformation And Riots. Throughout History, There Have Been
Reformation and Riots Throughout history, there have been reforms and revolts of every stripe.
However the most notable would be the renovations that took place in the nineteenth century and the
riots that soon followed those changes. An example of these mentioned the radicals that had been
involved in the civil unrest that had been caused by the poor working conditions and low wages of
factory workers. This triggered retaliation by the "captains of industry" from the likes of Andrew
Carnegie and Rockefeller. The issues of riots the factors are long hours, poor working conditions,
and the threat of losing a job from going on strike, and low wages. If you were a worker in this ...
As a consequence, of a steel mill owner like Andrew Carnegie, only caring about how to keep the
mill running efficiently and keeping costs low, many of these "robber barons' resolved this problem
by squeezing the amount of money that running the mill would be or having to replace machinery.
Instead, they kept the old machinery; this eventually leads to most American steel companies to go
out of business later down the line. American steel finally ran its course, as other countries began to
develop and have their industrial revolutions. These countries soon would pass up the American
steel industry and replace American as the leader in steelmaking and production. Because of the
horrid working conditions, many workers went on strike the demonstrate their unrest at the
dangerous situations in the factories and of course the long hours. Unfortunately, the moment that
the workers decided to go on strike they were instantly fired from their jobs. However, some
employees disagreed with the strikers and decided to go to work. These people were known as
"scabs" along with the scabs, factory managers hired immigrants to replace the employees that have
been fired for going on strike. The constant threat of losing a job for going on strike was always
there for factory employees. An example of this would be the Haymarket riot in which many
workers walked out of the plants, and decided to

Guernica Picasso
"Guernica" by Pablo Picasso which is a very dark painting that shows pain and chaos. Picasso was
working on a mural for the Paris Exhibition that was to be held in the summer of 1937. Picasso
discontinued his idea of that mural on May 1st 1937 so that he could being working on Guernica. He
did this because of the bombing that happen in his country where he lived. This painting was created
to show the tragedies of the Spanish Civil War. There was a lot of detail information about the
painting. Guernica showed pain, death, fear, loneliness and darkness. Picasso uses black, white, and
grey paint to set a somber mood and express pain and chaos. Guernica shows the anguish of its pain
on innocent civilian's. This would give a good reason why the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
From Picasso quote this is showing that Guernica is a war painting. This makes a lot of since when n
the painting the is a horse that was cut deep maybe a solider was being attacked
and his horse suffered the deep searing pain for the solider. But that doesn't explain where does the
woman holding a baby comes from.
The woman who is crying because the baby she holds in her arms is dead is one of the symbols that
tell the story of the bombing. The Spanish Civil war lasted from 1936–1939 which was saw as a
anti–war. This painting would not even had be created if Picasso didn't have his own beliefs on
everything. So he decided to follow what he wanted to paint. Guernica had a somber tone its art had
great interpretation's as to the chaos of shapes rather then random colors. Which gives a good feel to
what the painting is expressing. There is a hidden bull which is labeled as to represent the
Republications / Brutally / Evil

Guernica by Pablo Picasso Essay
Guernica by Pablo Picasso
In 1937, Pablo Picasso painted Guernica, oil on canvas. The Republican Spanish government
commissioned the mural for the 1937 World Fair in Paris. Guernica is a large mural, twenty–six feet
wide and eleven feet tall, and was placed at the entrance to Spain's pavilion. Picasso did not do any
work after receiving the commission until reading of the bombing of the Basque village of Guernica,
in Spain. It was that attack, perpetrated by the German Luftwaffe, that inspired him. Guernica,
however, is not a complete depiction of that event. In Guernica, Picasso masterfully conveys the
suffering of the Basque people and the tragedy of war. He seeks not to report on every detail of the
bombing, but only to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
At the extreme right, a woman is falling and has not yet hit the ground. Further left, a woman is
picking herself up after falling. The horse in the center is fatally wounded and will soon die. To the
far left, the child in his mother's arms has already died, and so has the warrior whose head rests at
the bottom of the mural. But again, the strong right to left movement arises from the direction in
which the subjects are looking.
Guernica is monochromatic to make its imagery more powerful. Lack of color keeps the viewer
focused on the subject matter at hand, as well as keeping the mural cold, which agrees with its
general theme of injustice in war. Also, Picasso's flat imagery does not distract the viewer from
concentrating on imagery. The viewer is given no other choice than to concentrate on the subject
matter of Guernica and ponder it's meaning. The flat, grayscale images generalize the imagery and
contribute to the general theme of unnecessary suffering and tragedy.
At the extreme right of Picasso's mural, a woman is falling from a burning building. Flames appear
to be spewing from the top of that building. The flames consist triangles with different values of
gray. The same light triangles are coming from the woman's dress. Her arms flail upwards as she
falls, and it is her fall that draws the eye downward and moves the viewer through the work. Below
lies the woman picking herself up off the

How Is Strategic Bombing Justified
Strategic bombing is a military strategy used in a total war with the goal of defeating the enemy by
destroying its morale or its economic ability to produce and transport materiel to the theatres of
military operations. This tactic was used by the United States and Britain against the Germans and
Japanese in World War II. Strategic bombing is debated on whether the United States and Britain
were justified in using it. The United States and Britain used strategic bombing to protect their
people from fascist dictators and were justified in doing so. In the beginning of World War II, air
forces only attacked military targets. This changed once "the German Luftwaffe began conducting
air raids on British cities, including London, during the summer of 1940," (The Editors of
Encyclopædia Britannica). Strategic bombing soon became a main part of military combat. It was
seen to be in the best interest of the country's side in the war. To the British, bombing German cities
was a type of revenge. They showed the same amount of mercy for the German civilians as the
Germans did for them, which was little to none. What the Allies did in Japan reflects what they did
in Europe. Like the British, the U.S. bombed Japan as a response to the Pearl Harbor attack. "As was
the case in the air war against Germany, military planners experimented with different bombing
tactics in order to maximize the damage inflicted on Japan and force a surrender," (The Choices
Program). The United States was working to decrease the power Japan had in the Pacific
Bombing cities that were seen as industrially advanced and vital to economic production became the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although, most of the damage caused by the U.S. and Britain was in the best interest of their
citizens. They wanted to stop the war as soon as possible and bombing the Axis powers helped
accomplish their goal. The United States and Britain were justified in using strategic bombing
against the German and

Extremely Loud And Incredibly Close
In Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, Thomas Schell Sr.'s account of the bombing in Dresden
gives the reader a clear insight into his behavior and the reasons for it. In one moment, his life was
changed forever as he lost everything that was dear to him. As soon as the bombing scene begins,
the reader is sent back to Dresden through the deep description of the memory. The brutal
description of all of the bodies burning, the fear in Thomas' heart, and the utter terror all around him
could not be more real. He coped with the pain through writing and soon lost his speech altogether.
This left him unable to share his emotive experience with anyone and furthermore, created a wedge
between him and his family. I would like to assert that after revealing ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Three hours later, another 529 Lancasters approached the city, but this time they were armed with
firebombs. Another onslaught by 311 United States Army Air Force (USAAF) B–17 Flying Fortress
bombers followed in the morning (Steele 2). The bombers proceeded across the charming city until
all of Dresden was burning. Flames of thousands of fires consumed air from outside and sucked it in
with "the force of a hurricane," spreading the fire and suffocating thousands of victims (Steele 2).
Most of Dresden's baroque buildings fell to the ground. "Several people were cowering by the
entrance," wrote one of the victims, "Others were on the steps. You could recognise that the corpses
had human shapes, but they were without clothes, hair, or eyes, just charred. If you touched one, it
fell apart into ash" (Steele 2). The firestorm continued into the next day when again it rained down
from 450 more USAAF B–17 Flying Fortress bombers over Dresden at 12:30 P.M. on February 14.
After the bombing and the firestorm, approximately 90% of the city center was destroyed. One
survivor noted his experience: "It wasn't safe to come out of the shelter until noon the next day.
When the Americans and their guards did come out, the sky was black with smoke... Everybody else
in the neighborhood was dead" (insert citation). Even as survivors made their way out of the
smoldering city, bombs were loosed on Dresden's railways, bridges and other transportation
facilities, killing thousands more. By the end of it all, Dresden was so utterly destroyed that the city
was only a little more than

What Is The Impact Of Bombing On Germany
The technological developments that assisted bombing, the impact of bombing on the German
economy, the impact of bombing on the German civilian morale and also the effects on the German
war effort all help explain why the Allied strategic bombing of Germany during the Second World
War was significant to quite a far extent. Each of the following paragraphs will analyse the impacts
of the Allied strategic bombing on different aspects of Germany and also what factors assisted the
Allied bombing campaign in creating a significant impact on Germany during the Second World
War. The technological developments during the campaign affected the significance of the bombing
of Germany during the Second World War. In 1939–1941, there were less planes, or navigational ...
The attacks on Hamburg were not a turning point of the war as Bomber Command's fortunes had
completely disappeared once they started targeting Berlin, where their loss rates peaked to
unacceptably high levels. Therefore Gee made less of an impact in assisting the Allied strategic
bombing of Germany compared to Window. However the impact on Hamburg caused by Window
was relatively short–lived because the Germans countered. On the other hand the long range escort
fighters, disposable fuel tanks and The Thousand Bomber raids had a long–lived impact. The P–51
Mustang was an important aircraft in the war that had an American airframe and a British Rolls–
Royce 'Merlin' Engine. Disposable fuel tanks, which increased the Allied fighter's range were loaded
onto the P–51 Mustang and by March 1944, the modified Mustang had a 1800 mile armed range and
could fly with the bombers to Berlin and back. Richard Ovary said 'The long–range escort fighter
transformed the air war overnight.' Lastly the thousand–bomber raid on 30th to 31st May 1942
against Cologne saw the destruction of a third of the inner zone of Cologne along with the
destroying of 20000 houses and the evacuation of 200000 people.

Pablo Picasso Guernica Essay
Guernica, is a painting made by Pablo Picasso in 1937, and it is a huge mural hanging in the Reina
Sofia Museum. Picasso wanted to create a picture that shows the suffering of innocent people in
times of war. Also, he wanted a way to express his anger towards what was happening and towards
war in general. The painting was made after Picasso learned about the tragedy that struck Guernica
town during War World Two. When observing the painting, one can notice it was made using only
three colors, white, black, and grey. The symbols in the painting are not always obvious, and one
needs to look thoroughly to be able to decipher all of them. However, the images in the painting
were arranged to serve a specific purpose, probably to grab the attention ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The bull has a white head and a dark body. Unlike the other figures in the mural, the bull seems to
be unharmed and calm. Some believe that Picasso added the bull because it represent the artist
country of origin Spain because it was famous for bullfighting. Others believe that the bull represent
brutality or the sides of the conflict in Spain at that time. To the right of the bull there is a horse that
looks like in deep pain and screaming, it looks as if it was injured and dying. The horse might
symbolize the people who got hurt during the attack on Guernica. Between the bull and the horse
some kind of birds that is most likely a pigeon. The pigeons have commonly been known to be signs
of peace, but in this painting the pigeon's peck is open as if it is screeching. Looking further to the
right, there is a women floating with a lantern in her hand. She might be an angel holding a light for
the victims of that massacre that happened in the village, and she is guiding the souls to the afterlife.
The women beneath her seems to be in agony and pain. The women is half naked with her breasts
showing, and she looks as if she is running for her life in fear and terror. Also, the women is looking
upward towards the lantern the other women is holding. Underneath the horse a sole flower. The
flower that is a weak living creature looks as if it is also trying to survive the horrors surrounding it.
To the right of

Pablo Picasso Guernica Essay
The echo of war resonates in the air of the countries and the hearts of the people it has affected even
years after it subsides. When Pablo Picasso created the larger–than–life mural Guernica, it becomes
rightly apparent that Picasso wanted it to impact the people so as to gain more support and sympathy
for the Spanish Republican cause, but I am not exactly sure if he realized how relatable this painting
would be for all of the wars of the future that would follow after World War II. Viewing the painting
from an inevitably political perspective, I find the picture to speak loudly to my own views on the
necessity of war, particularly on innocent bystanders and civilians, which, from my understanding,
relate greatly to Picasso's own anti–war sentiments. War impacts everyone differently, especially
since it is dependent on multiple, subjective matters: feelings towards both fighting sides,
relationships to soldiers, perspective on how necessary the war may appear, and so on. Up until May
1, 1937, Picasso had been relatively uninspired for his grand addition to the Spanish Pavilion at the
Paris World's Fair. His stance on the war greatly inspired the mural. He was very much against the
Spanish dictatorship taken on by Generalissimo ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As someone whose family comes has suffered from genocide, I feel as though I can understand
Picasso's pain for the Spanish people that he emulated onto the canvas. In the end, it comes down to
political perspective and how one may relate this to a social or political problem going on during
their time. All social and political problems are ultimately wars, at least in a figurative sense.
Picasso's mural can relate to any issue that we have faced, are confronted with, or will have to
overcome in the future, which defines it as the greatest anti–war piece, at least in my

Why Is Allied Strategic Bombing Important In Ww2
Allied strategic bombing during the Second World War did not achieve its intended objective, which
was to break German morale and bring about the swift defeat of Germany. However it did have a
very significant impact and assisted the allied victory. There are diplomatic and economic reasons
why the bombing campaign was significant. It also had a large impact on morale both in Germany
and in Britain and effected outcomes on the fighting fronts in Second World War by impairing the
German forces. The significance of the strategic bombing campaign has to be measured in terms of
its effect as compared with the effect of other actions taken by the allies. This essay will argue that
the real significance of allied strategic bombing was in capping ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Thus, in 1944 Germany produced 34,100 aircraft, but the allies produced 127,300. Allied production
was higher in almost every aspect in 1944, including tanks, artillery, rifles and machine guns. Even
though German military output trebled between 1941 and 1944 and Germany produced 1,500 tanks
a month in 1944 (almost matching the American output) as well as 2,800 aircraft (which was similar
to Soviet output), the fact is that Germany was becoming increasingly outgunned. Despite
Germany's respectable production rates, the allied forces combined had greater economic strength
which enabled them to keep increasing their military production. Bombing did not destroy the
German economy but it capped the possibility for economic expansion and was largely responsible
for stopping the rapid growth of the German economy. The constant bombardment forced Germany
to devote its remaining resources to military purposes. The significance of the bombing has to be
considered in relation to its cost. It took up 7% of Britain's war effort; 120,000 American and British
airmen died; and 21,000 bombers were lost. Some argue that the money should have been spent on
developing and building better surface ships and tanks and that, as the British Naval blockade had
suffocated Germany of much needed resources, its defeat was inevitable

Guernica Goya's Third Of May Meaning
Guernica was created by Pablo Picasso in 1937. The Spainsh Civil war is the cause of making
Guernica. The Basque Country village in northern Spain is were the bombing took place,
government warplanes is how the German and Italy destroyed the area. The German bombers were
supposedly affiliated with National forces and General Franco during the war. Pablo Picasso's
painting Guernica uniquely executed showing innocent people suffering during the bombing. His
piece became so popular, that it became a major antiwar symbol. Guernica became very popular
which helped tell the story of the bombing, while being on a world tour. The one of a kind painting
was painted in Paris, which was displayed in the Museum of Modern Art. One of the most important
The background of the paintings and some visual elements are the same when it comes to the
meaning of the painting. To a non–art student the visual at first glance is very important to set the
tone of the paintings. This helps the viewer understand the groundwork of the subject matter.
Picasso's Guernica is very representational but I can also see so abstract aspects in a weird way.
Goya's Third of May is naturalistic and representational but unlike Guernica we can clearly see the
people who are in charge causing the struggle. In both paintings the value of the light plays
important role in the paintings. Picasso uses shades of black and white to show all the different
aspects and the painting. Goya uses the value of the light to direct our attention to the main events in
the painting. The lines in Guernica is more curvy,where as Goya's third of May has more straight
lines which effects the flow of the painting. In both of the paintings the background of the paintings
are very similar. People, places, animals and things are being destroyed because of ruling issues. In
Goya's painting to can see hopelessness and suffering on the man's face while begging for his life.
Both of the paintings we can feel the senseless violence that was depicted. The violence that took
place was recorded and reported in the paintings, both of the artist wanted to make us aware of the
violence that took place in their

Strategic Bombing During World War 2
"World War 2 was a war fought in two distinct phases. The first was the last war of a new
generation. The second was emphatically the first of a new era" . "The British strategic
bomber campaign was of doubtful cost effectiveness" . Bomber Command was by far the largest
claimant on labour and factory space within the armed forces. Relative to their size they suffered
more casualties than any other sector. The Anglo–American bomber force was divided in
terms of strategy. Bomber Command believed it was too risky to bomb by day, while the Americans
believed it was too difficult to bomb by night. Initially both forces lacked accurate navigational
equipment, which deterred them from precision bombing. Germany developed a ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The morale of the German people was not affected enough to effect their war–waging capacity.
"Neither a maintenance of productivity nor a rebuilding of industry could have been achieved by
means of compulsive but only by virtue of the voluntary response of German workers" . It
was assumed that bombing raids would be made in the daylight. In August 1940 German bombers
suffered heavily in daylight even though they were escorted. This helped to confirm to Bomber
Command that night bombing was the best policy. Bomber Command flew night missions over
Germany during the winter of 1940–1941 in the belief their bombs had fallen within about 300
yards of their targets. This figure was plainly wrong, a new assumption was made. The R.A.F
decided the average error was closer to 1000 yards, which meant that Bomber Command could not
be expected to hit targets as small as oil facilities, until they had been equipped with vastly
improved navigational aids. The U.S.A.A.F opposed Bomber Commands view, they believed
accurate bombing could only be achieved during the day. They assumed unescorted bombers flying
in well–designed formations could penetrate the German lines. On 14th October 1943, 60 out 291
flying fortresses were shot down by German fighters during the last major raid on Schweinfurt. The
formation had been obliged to fly 400 miles without fighter cover. The Americans suspended
daylight

Pablo Picasso's Guernica
According to Oneota School of Art and Humanities, Picasso's painting "Guernica" is the most
important anti–war work of art produced in the twentieth century. At the time "Guernica" was being
presented in Spain, the creation of modern technology was being celebrated. This theme contributed
to the symbolism behind the work, which portrayed how the use of inhumane technology
contributes greatly to the horrors of war. This symbolism still remains very relevant to our present
day society due to the way wars have continued to occur since the Spanish Civil War all across the
world and due to the continuous advancement of tactical warfare. Over the past decade, it seems as
if wars have become more and more brutal due to the strong advancements in

State Of Ww2 ( Background )
State of WW2 (Background)
By 1945, the war between the Allies and Germany was slowly reaching its end. To the west, "Nazi
leader Adolf Hitler's desperate counteroffensive against the Allies in Belgium's Ardennes forest had
ended in a total failure". As well as in the east, it looked very hopeless for Germany(History.com
Staff.). Meanwhile, the Western Allies began considering the use of strategic bomb to fight against
Germany's stubborn defense. "In January 1945, the Royal force began to consider plans for the
widespread bombing of cities in eastern Germany" against Dresden and two other cities(Hickman,
Kennedy.). Also on February, the three leaders of the Allies, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Stalin and
Winston Churchill "met at Yalta in the USSR and compromised on their visions of the postwar
World"(History.com Staff. "Bombing of Dresden."). The background is very significant because it
shows the initial cause of the bombing of Dresden.
The Yalta Conference
The topic of area bombing certain parts of Germany to end the World War II was finalized in the
Yalta Conference. The conference involved "the Deputy Chief of the Soviet General Staff, and
General Aleksei Antonov". They had a talk about the possibility of area bombing Germany and the
possible cities they would target if they were to bomb them. Some of the targets they discussed were
Berlin and Dresden. In the end, they ended the meeting with the final decision to bomb Dresden
even though "much of Dresden's industry

The Significance Of Strategic Bombing Of Germany
In this essay I will assess the significance of strategic bombing of Germany. I will do this by
evaluating four key areas of the German war effort. This will include German and British moral,
German economy, its effect on the outcome of the Eastern Front and the results of the preparation
for D–Day. Overall allied bombing did not have a significant impact on the outcome of the war as
for the majority of the war bombing techniques and technology were primitive and so had little
effect. It only became a threatening tool latter on in the war, when the allies had effectively won.
One potentially significant area of impact caused by strategic bombing was its effect on German
moral. This is because it was expected to terrify and shock the German ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This panic combined with the bombing of a single rocket research station was enough to make the
Luftwaffe chief of staff, Hans Jeschonnek, commit suicide. The devastating effect of these events
was amplified by the fear of an invasion of Germany, due to the Allied forces landing in Normandy
and the Russians approaching from the East. However, because of the unreliability of bomber
commands performance the Nazis managed to quickly control the situation. They ensured that no
photographs or news reports were published from the bomb stricken reports meaning that the rest of
Germany could only gather information from stories and tales. On top of this only a small part of
Germany was bombed as the allied forces simply did not have the technology to reach the majority
of the Reich. That it was relatively easy for the country to regroup, resulting in heavy retaliation and
a continuous growth in German production. However, in the last years of the war bombing
technology drastically improved and the attacks were relentless. As opposed to less than one quarter
of bombs dropping within five miles of the target, each bomb now hit their target and inflicted
maximum damage due to new aiming technology. Bombing raids were now performed twenty–four
hours a day, in the night by Bomber Command and in the day by the heavily armoured bombers in
the American 8th squadron. 1,500 bombers were now available after a huge increase in production
speed, each with the

Pablo Picasso And Picage Seurat Analysis
"How can a painting have so much to say" Is one question that people may ask themselves. Telling
stories and expressing one's self in paintings brings one to show others a new way of seeing and
thinking about life. The canvas of every writer is easy to visualize or to relate to by how the painter
expressed himself and wanted to portray the message through a painting. From Pablo Picasso to
George Seurat and to so much more. The meaning and story of the panting's take you to a whole
different world. They make us view things differently and see things in a new perspective by how
the painter is showing or expressing themselves. They explain what they had to go through or what
was going on, by telling their story we can feel the emotion behind it as well as how raw it makes
one feel. Through the painting, one can make their assumptions about what the story is. The beauty
of art shows either the great or corrupt that the painter sees or the ongoing situation. They show the
people different perspectives of what's going on and they make you feel the same emotion that they
put on the painting. We see art as a way of expression and it makes us connect to the painting that
we see. The art helps us understand the way the person behind the drawing felt or what they saw
when it was going on. The beauty of art is that it lets everyone express themselves through painting,
so we can tell our story. Art is expressed through 1) human culture, 2) emotion, and 3)
communication.
Through human culture, the artist shows the emotion that takes place. Every artist expresses them in
a unique way. They focus on things that catch their eyes or things that they feel are important. The
artist paints to show the world many different sides of human culture as well as current events. For
example, Pablo Picasso painted a painting named Guernica which symbolized the horrors of war
and as a result, has become an anti–war symbol. He was protesting the bombing of Guernica. On the
far left is a woman, head back, screaming in pain and grief, holding the lifeless body of her dead
child. This is one of the most devastating and unforgettable images in the painting. To her right is
the head and partial body of a large white bull, the only unharmed and

United States Strategic Bombing Survey Thesis Statement
"The winding path to peace is always a worthy one, regardless of how many turns it takes" ("Star
Wars the Clone Wars"). On the early morning of December 7, 1941, the Japanese empire, under the
leadership of Hideki Tojo, struck an unprecedented blow to the United States Navy and the country
itself at the naval base Pearl Harbor in Hawaii. From Pearl Harbor, to the Battle of Iwo Jima and
Okinawa, the Japanese continued to possess a perpetual and relentless tenacity to fight until their
last breath. One thing especially evident to the Americans and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the
president, was that Japan, no matter the cost or propositions put forth, would never acquiesce to the
ultimatums of the United States. At the time the Japanese made their ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The main argument aims to defend how Japan was already defeated by the time the bombs were
dropped, which of course makes sense provided that their allies, Germany and Italy, had already
been conquered. However, the Japanese at the time were relentless in their struggle to avoid defeat
and an unconditional surrender. Nevertheless, a survey given out by President Truman titled the
"United States Strategic Bombing Survey," was given out to 1000 experts in an attempt to study the
heart of the conflict. The following conclusion of "it seems clear that, even without the atomic
bombing attacks, air supremacy over Japan could have exerted sufficient pressure to bring about
unconditional surrender and obviate the need for invasion" was made at the end of the survey
(Dahi). Provided their implicit conclusion that the bombs were an unnecessary act of war, the
argument is surfaced that Japan would not have lasted much longer if the intervention had been
halted. However, as history has revealed, "the Japanese military command rejected the request for
unconditional surrender" ("The Manhattan Project"). From this statement, it is evident that even if
Japan had surrendered, it would have had to come at the cost of manpower and lives on both
sides–––something that the United States were done allocating resources to. Whether or not a single
atomic bomb was dropped or many bombs meant for smaller areas, the destruction appears to
parallel each

The Bombing Operations Carried Out by Allied Forces...
The bombing operations carried out by allied forces against Germany during the Second World War
is an important part of the war. The bombings had a dramatic impact on Germany at this time and
shaped how the Second World War was fought ultimately future warfare. During the Second World
War aerial warfare was still a new concept that had been introduced during the First World War.
Bombing was an even newer tactic, that offered the advantage of hastening the defeat of ones own
opponent without prolonged conflict and carnage on land, like trench warfare on the western front in
the WW1. The use of bombing during the Second World War also forever changed warfare, as the
results of the bombing campaign and the effectiveness of bombing were ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Harris was responsible for the change of tactics that the British used, shifting from 'precision'
bombing of key economic targets to 'area' bombing which relied on the sheer destruction that
bombing could cause and targeting cities and towns instead of key economic industries. On the Axis
side and important when looking at strategic bombing in Europe is Nazi dictator Adolph Hitler
whom rose to power during the 1930s and transformed the democratic Weimar Republic into the
Single party state that is the Third Reich. During the Second World War Hitler appointed himself as
Commander–in–chief of the German army making him directly in charge of Germany's armed
forces.
During the Second World War many interesting pieces of equipment and new technology came into
use by both Allied and Axis forces. After the end of precision night bombing by the RAF and the
subsequent switch to area bombing a new and interesting piece of technology known as Gee came
into use. Gee was a navigational aid that utilized radio signals from Britain in order to determine
both the aircraft's position and the location of the intended target. Gee's intended use was to improve
the accuracy of British bombers during night raids. Although Gee did work, it had a limited range
and the signals would not reach past the Rhine River. Still Gee was a success for about 6 months
until the Germans implemented countermeasures to jam the signals. Another interesting piece of
technology

Nike: A Simplified Model Based On Industry Practice
Exploitation of Factories Workers
Based on the Total Rewards Framework, "A Simplified Model Based On Industry Practice", Nike
and its contract manufactures have a poor total rewards management for compensation, base pay for
its contract manufacturers factories' workers as their wages are below the minimum wages. It is
evident on Nike's internal report, their contract manufacturers exploit their factories workers through
long working hours and paying lower than minimum wages(WSWS, 2011). This caused the public
to view Nike as a company with poor total rewards management. Furthermore, one of its contract
manufacturers at Bangalore, India, did not raise the minimum salary for its workers after a
government–mandated increase.(WallStreet, 2014) ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nike can provide compensation like variable bonus of monetary benefits to the contract
manufacturers if they pass the checks. They can also give benefits like recognition such as
certificate of safety achievement to boost the reputation of the contract manufacturers' factories and
may gain more business for them in the future.
Lastly, Nike can focus on factories workers' first line of contact which is their immediate supervisors
and managers (NikeManufacturing, 2016) to resolve the problem of exploitation of factories
workers and unsafe working environment. Nike can implement an anonymous feedback system
where all factories workers are to evaluate their immediate supervisors and managers. Nike can
provide compensation of variable bonus such as monetary incentives to reward supervisors or
mangers if they have good rating. This would motivate the supervisors and managers not to practice
unethical

The Effects Of Guernica By Pablo Picasso
1. Introduction
The painting Guernica by Pablo Picasso was created in response to the bombing of Guernica during
the Spanish Civil War and it serves to highlight the atrocities that resulted from it. This essay will
explore the relationship between art and war, with particular reference to Picasso's Guernica. This
will be achieved my discussing firstly the background that came prior to the painting and to the
event itself. Secondly, it will be proved by drawing conclusions on what the painting serves to
resemble. Lastly, it will discuss the effects of that the painting Guernica has continued to have even
after the Spanish civil war.
2. The emergence of Cubism
The Cubism movement was founded in the twentieth century by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque
as a radical from of modern art. Cubism emerged as a response to the swiftly changing world (Doss,
2003:1). Cubism was a rejection of the traditional art values, styles and forms that accompanied the
world prior to the revolutionary twentieth century, as it sought to establish a new method for
responding to and representing the modern age. In this sense, Cubism was a direct artistic reaction to
the modernity that emerged, making ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This indirect reference is manifested in the fact that there is no actual evidence or depiction of any
bombs, planes or warfare that would resemble either the Spanish civil war or the bombing of
Guernica. Instead, there it is a depiction of the general human suffering and loss that serves as a
cross–cultural and worldwide representation of the atrocities of war. Guernica (figure 1) is therefore
a political commentary on the Spanish civil war, and in particular on the bombing of Guernica, that
is a reflection and symbol of the effects, rather than the cause of the bombing and warfare (Polombo,

Strategic Bombing Of The Ussr Essay
Even before the end of the Second World War, the USSR was a very secretive and closed society.
US intelligence had little to no information about Soviet military strength and did not even have
accurate maps of the USSR. The best aerial photographs available to western planners were from the
Luftwaffe and had been captured by the allies at the end of WWII. Outside of these captured photos,
virtually no maps or aerial photography existed of the USSR, especially those areas in the Urals,
Siberia and the Far East. As victory in WWII appeared imminent, the USAAF under General Hap
Arnold commissioned studies to assess the impact of strategic bombing in the war. In addition to
results about strategic bombing, the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey (USSBS) concluded that "the
U.S. should have an intelligence organization capable of knowing the strategic vulnerabilities,
capabilities and intentions of any potential enemy." In spite of the aforementioned dearth of
intelligence on the USSR, very specific information was needed for military and political leaders to
make decisions regarding their strengths, weaknesses, and capabilities. Additionally, the strategic
bomber forces needed a list of verified targets in case conflict with the USSR broke out. In order to
fill the major voids in information the US civilian leaders employed a bifurcated approach: human
intelligence (HUMINT) obtained through agency operatives, and signals (SIGINT) and imagery
(IMINT) intelligence acquired

Strategic Bombing
The war to end all wars sadly did not satisfy its mean, it just was the harbinger of another war,
which would succeed its forerunner both in casualties and weapons. The Second World War lasted
from 1939 until May of 1945. Adolf Hitler, dictator and ruler of the Third Reich, sought revenge on
the countries who had put Germany to scorn during the Second World War. He was going to str at
nothing even if it meant killing civilians, death camps, and air bombing cities. The Allies such as
England and America came together to conquer their most deadly enemy. Strategic bombing thought
of by the English, whose doctrine was that "the bomber will always get through." As it will be
discussed we will see how this was not always true and that some ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Through bombing of German cities the Allies could to make sure their victory. The AAF won
daylight superiority towards 1944, which left the Nazis with many casualties. Having the upper hand
here also helped the Allies out on D–Day, by losing fewer men than they would have. " Rescue and
repair activities. The strategic bombing also forced the GAF to change its priorities. In 1941 the
Luftwaffe employed 65 percent of its aircraft on the eastern front; in 1944 it used only 32 percent
there. Certainly that shift helps to explain, to some degree, German successes in 1941 and German
failures in 1944."( Kenneth P. Werrell ) We also would bomb industrious places (oil factories) so that
the Germans would have that much less oil or other crucial product that they needed for the war
effort. This theory thought of by the U.S. is known as the "strategic interdiction, which the Allies
used to cut the enemy's capacity to field forces by destroying the production facilities that
manufactured weapon

Children of Men Film Essay
Children Of Men.
"Children of Men" Directed by Alfonso Cuaron. Is set in the year 2027, in a chaotic world in which
humans can no longer procreate, Theo Faron a former activist, agrees to help transport a
miraculously pregnant woman, Named Kee, to a sanctuary located out at sea, where her child's birth
could help scientists save mankind. In the film Children of Men, there are many crucial scenes to
help convey the idea of the film, however I find one of these scenes particularly important; namely
the apartment scene. In this scene Theo is being driven through the streets of London to the Ark Of
Arts to visit his cousin Nigel. The director uses a number of techniques to help portray the themes
and ideas, such as music, setting, lighting ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The images and lighting are similar to images that record the suffering of people during the
depression of the 1930s. However, inside the park the weather starts to brighten making everything
look lush and vibrant. It seems absurd to see such a strong contrast after passing through the
imperial gates. This brings to mind the saying "The grass is always greener on the other side" This
helps to show how the members of the public see this part of London as a desired thing and that
everything is better, but this saying usually ends up being false; these people still live in the same
world, it is all an illusion, Further on in the scene Theo says to his cousin Nigel, "A hundred years
from now, there won't be one single sad f**k to look at any of this (meaning his apartment). What
keeps you going?" To which Nigel replies "You know what it is, Theo? I just don't think about it".
He is just ignoring the inevitable.
Mise–en–scene creates a shocking impact as the viewer draws on their prior knowledge to make
connections to the symbols revealed in this sequence. As Theo crosses the bridge to the Ark of Arts,
above the Battersea power station, you can see a floating pig, reminiscent of Pink Floyd's album
cover for "Animals". As Theo enters the court in the background, you can see a painting of two
policemen kissing which is quite a famous piece by the street artist Banksy. After Theo enters the
apartment he is greeted by his cousin Nigel. Behind him is

Critical Analysis Of Guernica
Name: Raymonde Weyzen
Assignment: Research Paper
Course: Visual Methodologies
Supervisor: Alena Alexandrova
Date: 18 December 2014
Picasso's Guernica: An analysis based on the methodologies provided by Panofsky and Barthes
In January 1937, Pablo Picasso accepted the commission for a 25 foot long mural for the Spanish
pavilion at the Exposition Internationale des Arts et Techniques dans la Vie Moderne (Borja–Villel
et al., 2010). This exposition was a creation of the Spanish Government in exile, at the time of the
Civil War. Therefore it was imbued with political and diplomatic meanings and served as
propaganda for the Republican Government (Borja–Villel et al., 2010). The subject matter of the
painting is the attack on the Basque town of Guernica by German planes (Borja–Villel et al., 2010).
However, this event per se is not what is highlighted in the painting. Picasso used this scene to
demonstrate his personal rejection of war and, taking this further, to demonstrate to the world the
costly struggle by the Spanish people in search for freedom (Borja–Villel et al., 2010; Corbin,
1999). As a result, Guernica became to be a worldwide icon for political protest (Kopper, 2014). The
Specifically, his earlier composition studies show the involvement of the bull emotionally, since the
animal has been sketched both sad (by the position of the head and the pupils) as well as furious (by
the showing of a gallop) (Gottlieb, 1964). This has, among others, led to the interpretation that the
bull is what represents "Loyalist Spain", the Republicans (Gottlieb, 1964). The horse would, as a
consequence, be interpreted as a symbol for the victims of the Franco–regime due to its character of
dependency rather that leadership (Gottlieb,

Pablo Picasso Guernica vs. Theodore Gericault's Raft of...
For centuries artists have moved audiences through the use of pictures. As time progressed those
images became more and more demanding of the viewer until they were meant to invoke a physical
response. Perhaps the earliest account of such emotionally exact artwork is the 1818 piece, Raft of
the Medusa, by Theodore Gericault. As time progressed people became more politically aware and
involved and generations of art portrayed this. Pablo Picasso's Guernica, created in 1937, is a great
example of how modern times soon saw a peak in the occurrence of allegorical and politically
packed artworks. Gericault's The Raft of the Medusa and Picasso's Guernica are both horrifying
accounts of the nature of men that aimed to alter a viewer's political ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This predominantly two–toned color motif allowed for more focus to be drawn to the most dynamic
figures, which are the same humans Gericault wanted viewers to see and sympathize for.
While Gericault's, Raft of the Medusa was essentially criticized for its lack of direct criticism of the
event and more a display of the human element, it is this feature that made it characteristically
romantic. Gericault took the national scandal out of the papers and turned it into a personal event for
each of the passengers. Rather than depict the weltering bodies of the crew, he gave them more
muscular frames in vigorous poses. Originally setting out to portray the event as nothing more than
a visual truth, he shifted his focus to portray a greater truth of suffering.
The suffering is reflected in the face of every passenger and it is the main focus of the piece than
any other element. The Raft's theme of human suffering evoked empathy and compassion, which
helped project the image beyond any hopes the artist could have held for the piece. This
predominant focus on the human condition allowed a stereotypical Romantic piece. Another artist
famous for highlighting the human condition was Spanish–born, Pablo Picasso.
In 1936 the Spanish government commissioned Picasso to paint a feature piece for their
international exposition in Paris at the peak of World War II. Picasso was unsure of what to paint
until in 1937 when Nazi warplanes bombed the Spanish town of

How Did Guernica Change

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Julie Brown

More from Julie Brown (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

How Did Guernica Change