Objective Violence

Objective Violence
Revolution is nothing but total change. It consists of two types, object, and subjective violence. Objective violence is the systemic, everyday violence.
It is something that takes places every day and becomes the part of the ordinary functioning of the society. On the other hand, subjective violence is
one that takes place due to objective violence, and this could include war, rape, famine and much more. So we can say, violence leads to revolutionary
violence which in turns leads to revolution. Revolution is comprised of ideas and ideology. Ideas such as socialism, Marxism, totalitarianism. Ideologies
can be seen as a worldview such as fascism, fundamentalism, liberalism, capitalism.
Marx in The Communist Manifesto argues that Bourgeoisie ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In his work, Fannon identifies three groups who take part in a revolution. The first group, are the laborers, and according to Fannon, will seek violent
revolt when they know the colonial government renders them as useless people and places them outside of the system. As also mentioned by Mark,
the working class of the country, are most likely to take up arms and participate in violent decolonization efforts at the request of the natives. The third
group, are people that the colonial government favored because of their higher level of education, may try to talk them the first two groups down and
accept a compromise into the colonial system. If the natives, Fannon argues, do not desire to share power, they will reject the compromise and continue
with efforts to decolonize the country
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Essay On The Impact Of 1968
THE IMPACT OF 1968
The world revolution of 1968 of course primarily concerned a series of major political issues: the hegemony of the United States and its world
policies, which had led it into the Vietnam war; the relatively passive attitude of the Soviet Union, which the 1968 revolutionaries saw as "collusion"
with the United States; the inefficacy of the traditional Old Left movements in opposing the status quo. In retrospect, 1968, the year of global revolt
halfway between the end of World War II and the end of theCold War, looked like a failed revolution. Nonetheless, the impacts of 1968 formulated
ever gradually progressing definitions of today's world–system.
The change protagonists attributed for in the belief of a common cause, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The belief among the protestors that the Old Left was deluded up with the establishment and had become an obstacle to the stimulus of social change
led to the inception of the New Left. Moreover, its improvisations formulated the upheavals to be existentialist in nature with an aim to solidify
humanity. Thus, arose the revolutionary movements focus on various social issues such as peace activism, anti–racism, feminism, environmentalism
and so on. These issues were of a social trend rather than political or economic one. They were not trying to reform the system. They wanted to
dismantle the corporate system they have concluded had failed them.
Some of these student groups became a major part of the New Left, a broad–based political movement that challenged existing forms of authority,
while others embraced a counterculture that promoted sexual liberation and unabashed drug use. Moreover, the escalation of protests intensified to be
inclusive of other movements who sought to seize the opportunity to broadcast their own interests. These movements were met with anti–activist out
lashes from the Conservative side of the society alternating the protests to escalate into

Policymakers have a range of tools to use in conflict...
Policymakers have a range of tools to use in conflict resolution and post–conflict reconstruction. While varied in breath and effect, the political,
economic, and military tools policy makers use ties to traditional methods of conflict resolution. However, as conflicts have evolved to occupy the
larger and more public stages following globalization, so have the tools. Globalization not only increased state–to–state awareness of inequalities in
wealth and resources, but also within states; increasing tension along ethnic and tribal lines. (Bercovitch and Jackson, 5) The political, economic, and
military tools used in conflict resolution and post–conflict reconstruction present a deeply interconnected method of reshaping a war–torn ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Economic measures seek to establish long–term macroeconomic policies and sustainable community development by providing humanitarian relief,
essential social services, and communication. Military measures seek to demilitarize politics and transform cultures of violence through disarmament,
demobilization, establishing law and order, and rebuilding military and police forces. Ramsbotham also identifies a fourth tenant not mentioned in the
paper's question but equally important, social measures. Social measures seek to heal psychological wounds and facilitate reconciliation by building
trust and inter–communal dialog. Together these lines of effort replace lost essential infrastructure, rebuild manufacturing capability to support the
population, and construct the framework for a state to thrive. (Week 3 Lecture, 3) Yet despite the different goals in each of the categories, they are far
from disconnected in practice. Political, economic, and military tools are as intertwined as their counterparts in a Realists Balance of Power system. In
The Balance of Power in International Relations, Richard Little describes power as a function of the size of the population and territory, resource
endowment, economic capability, military strength, political stability and competence. (Little, 174) Stronger nations tend to show stronger

Shelley'sThe Revolt Of Islam, And The French Revolution
After the glories of the Revolution had been washed away by the blood bath in France during the terror and consequent events, the artistic stage of
Europe came to be dominated by a "spirit of gloom and misanthropy", a culture of political despondency, an age of catastrophic despair. Shelley's The
Revolt of Islam, according to Cian Duffey, was "an attempt to revise the cultural record surrounding history's foremost political catastrophe, to relocate
the apparent disaster of the revolution within a long–term systematic, natural economy of hope". Shelley does not just attempt to correct the failed
political confidences of his fellow artists like Byron, Wordsworth and Southey but challenges the dominant catastrophist record of the Revolution in the
public mind. "Writing the Revolution," to quote Duffy again, "would therefore also mean righting the revolution: correcting public interpretation of
what had happened in France". By calling the French Revolution the "master theme of the epoch in which we live", and in turn writing about another
failed attempt of a Revolution, Shelley seeks to trace its locus in a Necessitarian/Deterministic notion of the natural history of politics, a history within
which the Napoleonic collapse of the Revolution is a natural part of the inevitable, the gradual and long–term process of political change. Dismissed by
critics like Bloom and White as "an abortive allegorical epic" which is "thematically incoherent", The Revolt of Islam has not received

Defining A Failed State Of The Soviet Union
Defining a failed state
Before the many faults of the term 'failed state' can be enumerated, it is obviously pertinent to define what exactly is meant by the phrase. The idea of
a state that does not meet certain requirements (i.e. fails) largely came to prominence in the last few decades, just before the turn of the 20th century
and after the fall of the Soviet Union. Since then, the concept has morphed and shifted in response to development by its proponents and criticism by
its detractors. Although accepted as a contemporary facet of foreign policy discourse, the term has its conceptual basis in early state formation theory.
An early definition of a state asserts that a state succeeds (i.e. does not fail) if it maintains the legitimate use of force within its borders (Weber 1919).
This thread of legitimate force became a major part of state failure theorising and, in the 1990s, many definitions added to this. Helman & Ratner (1992:
3) defined a state as a failure if it was unable to sustain its position as a member of the international community or function independently, emphasising
the internationalist perspective of failed states. Further extensions to the term categorise a failed state as unable to provide internal services to its
citizens, such as the provision of public goods and governance, the maintenance of law and order, the security of borders, and the protection of its
population (Zartman 1995; Jones 2008: 180); a failure to do so thereby signifies a loss of

The And Of The Family
One of the first institutions that God created was the family. The family is the backbone of every society, and the strength of any people will be
determined by the strength of their homes. In this day and age, it is important to have families that will strive to honor and glorify God. The need for
this can be seen in the state of this present world. So many are lives are being destroyed by sin, evil, corruption, and Satan; almost every time, these
problems stem back to trouble in home. Without a doubt, present–day families are struggling to find peace, balance, and harmony.
Why is this so often the case? The answer is plain and simple: families have left God's biblical pattern for the home. As time goes on, people begin to
drift further and further from God's original intent for the family. Now, our society not only accepts homosexuality as an acceptable and legal union,
but it now also recognizes them as parents of children as well! Discipline has all but been done away with. Families have drifted so far from God's
purpose, and it is no wonder why they are having such a hard time building up another generation. The cycle needs to be broken before its failure
becomes too overwhelming.
The first and most important guideline for any family is that it ought to be firmly grounded in the Word of God. TheBible ought to be the foundation for
any institution, but, especially, it should be the foundation of the home. Within its pages, the answer to all of life's questions can

Oppression In The Hunger Games
For thousands of years, governments have been oppressing their people. Although their reasons for doing so may have been different, the outcomes
were all the same: a revolt of the people. There are many examples of this throughout history, such as in the French Revolution and the American
Revolution. The Hunger Games, a tale of a dystopian society filled with maltreatment by "The Capitol," displays the path to insurrection triggered by
the mounting cases of misery brought on by their government, that was attacking lower classes of people. By using common themes of oppression and
rebellion found throughout history, The Hunger Games is a striking example of how repression by government will eventually lead to a revolt of the
people.
One of the subtle ways a totalitarian government casts its shadow over its people is through class distinction. By making the privilege gap so vast
between The Capitol and the twelve districts, and being able to choose which districts will obtain the advantage not only during the Hunger Games,
but in everyday life, The Capitol discreetly displays its control over the people. For example, Districts 1–3 have far more resources, sponsors, money,
and publicity than the other districts, thus giving them a higher chance in winning the Hunger Games, which is precisely what the government wants.
Conversely, District 12, Katniss' district, is a poverty–stricken mining community that seldom has enough assets to get them through the day. While

Essay on Dual-Earner Family
"In dual earner families, the father's willingness to share responsibilities is a crucial factor. If he is uninvolved, the mother will carry a double
load, at home, and work, which leads to fatigue, distress, and little time and energy for children" (Berk, 2009). The challenges that Deb, Ron and
their children face are both parents work on none stop schedule. Deb and Ron interview gave insight as to how busy they are; they also talked about
how their typical day goes. For example in Ron's interview, he discusses how his day starts. He wakes up at 5:30am, gets himself ready for work,
open blinds to let in the day light, get the children their morning juice, bring Deb her water so that she can wake up and began her day. Along with...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
From the interview, Deb and Ron did not share if they had even attempted to address their schedule and the lack of family time they give the
children. Challenges that may present itself within this case of Deb and Ron being a dual earner family, is time management, quality time for
each other, as well as quality time for their children, Deb and Ron need to look at a way to achieve work and life balance. In identifying, the first
possible key issue is time management it is something that stands out for Deb and Ron. If they apply family time management skills, they can
improve their quality of family time. One key component in sharing quality time together is being clam and focused on family activities. Secondly,
Ron and Deb may find it helpful to do family goal setting; in order for this to work, they have to both be willing to put in the time. However, before
Ron and Deb can be successful at this they must make decisions about their priorities, such as what are their needs and the needs of different family
members? For example, Charlie may, need more play time with dad, and one on one cuddle time with mom. Thirdly, they could use a family calendar;
this tool will help with family scheduling. The next issues Ron and Deb will need to address are making sure they are giving their children quality
time. This time is important in their social development stages; children are learning to form and value relationships with others. Intimate and caring
relationships are

Buckingham Character Analysis
Buckingham's Desire for Revolution Shakespeare wrote many plays during his lifetime, but possibly none as complex and busy as Richard III. It is
an intricate play where many different characters are portrayed in many different roles. One of those characters is the Duke of Buckingham, a villain
and for the majority of the play the trusted accomplice for Richard. In almost every scene in which Buckingham was portrayed, he proved himself to
be a rebellious villain over and over. As a rebel, he fought as a revolutionist, craving a change of events for self–seeking power. Buckingham
exemplifies the definition of a revolutionist rebel because of his willingness to be part of a revolution in order to change his surroundings and
increase his own eminence. He followed through with almost every plan given to him by Richard to accomplish his purposes until the final order
to kill the young princes. Early on in the play, we learn of the character Buckingham and his allegiance sworn to Richard, the Duke of Gloucester.
One can view Buckingham as Richard's partner in arms. Throughout most of the play, we see the two conspirators design and carry out evil and
malicious acts to place Richard as the king. They were willing to remove any obstacle in order for a new king to be crowned. Clarence, Hastings,
and Lady Anne are a few of the characters who befell a gruesome fate due to the conspiracy of Richard and Buckingham. Buckingham is completely
devoted to Richard's cause and will stop at

Ideology In The Revolution Of 1848 Essay
The Role of Ideology in the Revolutions of 1848
Year 1848 is described as "mad year"– mad with fight for freedom. Already its first months, in almost all parts of Europe, brought explosion of aims
and aspirations, which were accumulated during the after–congress period. Revolutionary movements spread throughout the whole Europe, apart from
Russia, where the system of serfdom did not allow any revolts, and Great Britain, where the reforms were carried out in non–revolutionary channels.
Despite the differences in social, economic and political structures of European countries, the revolutions of 1848 were characterised by uniformity, and
their ideology was a common denominator.
There were ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because of overall crises, many reforms were needed, most of which had an ideological background.
Nevertheless, the ideology did not play a huge role throughout the whole revolution. Year 1848 can be divided into three periods which were
characterised by variable importance of new ideas of 19th century. The main ideology in opposition to the order established during the Congress of
Vienna was often called 'liberalism'. This name indicates that the primary motive of it was to strive after freedom in contrary to dependence and
restrictions forced on societies and individuals by absolute monarchs. Colloquially, all people who were against absolute regime and were after
constitution established by nations representativer, were called liberals. They demanded freedom of religion and tolerance, freedom of word, press
and societies. They thought that everybody should be equal as far as law is concerned.
Another 19th century idea was radicalism, which was pretty much the same ideology, with only slight differences: radicals supported republican form
of power rather than constitutional monarchy, they wanted common right to vote, they were saying less about freedom of an individual, more about
social justice.
At the beginning of the revolutions 1848, the ideology was extremely important. All social classes were in misery, because the outcome of

Cervical Potenosis Paper
To understand cervical spinal stenosis, one must understand the process of disc degeneration and the effect it has on your spine. As people age, the
disc between the vertebra begin to lose a percentage of its water contact, thus effecting its ability to absorb shock. At first, the changes occur in the
annulus of the disc (Cervical Spinal Stenosis, 2013). These tears in the outer ring of the disc might not caused any symptoms and heal by the
formation of scar tissue. However, if this scar tissue is repeatedly subject to tears, it wears down and loses all its ability to absorb shock. The disc then
begins to collapse, causing the space between each vertebra to become smaller and smaller. This shifting of vertebra causes abnormal pressure on the
articular ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This thickening causes bone spurs to develop. These bone spurs could begin to encroach on the nerves on the spine, causing a narrowing of the
foramen. This narrowing of foramen is call spinal stenosis. However, if the body spurs start to place pressure on the spinal canal, cervical
myelopathy can begin to take place (Cervical Spinal Stenosis, 2013). There is usually narrowing of one, or more, of three areas of the spine. One area
is the canal of the spinal cord, where the nerves roots also run. The second area would be the canals branching out from the spinal cord that the roots
of the nerves expand from. The third area affected would be the opening between the vertebra, where the nerves leave the spine and go to the rest of the
body (Questions and Answers About Spinal Stenosis, 2013).
Epidemiology:
Lumbar spinal stenosis is most common reason for surgery in people over the age of 60 in the United States
Almost half a million people in the US suffering from lumbar spinal stenosis and many more experiencing cervical spinal stenosis.
Risk Factors:
Men and women over 50
Those who are born with a narrowing of the spinal

Compare And Contrast The French Revolution And Christian...
It has been proven by historians that the French revolution is so similar in many ways to the 25th of January revolution. Obviously, History repeats
itself; as we have similar events in which took places in different parts of the world at different eras. As both the French revolution of 1789–1799 and
the Egyptian revolution of 2011; were in different places and different times, but still they have numerous similarities regarding their motivations, rulers,
reasons, demands and methods. First, both were inspired by other countries revolutions success in reaching their demands by revolting, for the French
were inspired by the American Revolution's success, and Egyptians were inspired by the success of the Tunisian Revolution. Ideas ... Show more
During the Attack on the Tuileries palace, the march was bigger than expected so the crowd defeated the Swiss Guard. Same as during the Day of
Anger when the government attempted to suppress the crowd and failed as the people eventually forced them to retreat, succeeded in marching and
an excessive number of demonstrations occurred. During the March on Versailles and the Day of Anger, women took part actively within the
revolution as they marched too and risked their lives as well as men. Similar to the storming of Bastille when the people entered the prison and freed
the prisoners taken there, in Egypt, protestors attacked prisons/police stations such as Torrah prison and the police station in Khargah, took control and
freed the prisoners taken there; and as well as the French protestors robbed the city armory for weapons as they marched to the Palace of Versailles, the
Egyptian stole weapons from the police stations. In France, they formed the National Assembly at that time to rule the country in a suitable way in
order to control the situation, and Egypt likewise turned everything to the Supreme Council of the Egyptian Armed forces by the leadership of the
country in order to control the situation. Sadly, a lot of people were injured and other died throughout both revolutions in order to bring renaissances
and improvements to their countries. Finally,

Essay on The Inevitabilty of the American Revolution
In the early 1620's, the New England region was first settled by a group of adventurers. These settlers left England, their native country, by the
permission of King Charles the First. At their own expense they transported themselves to America, and, with great risk and difficulty, settled among
other peoples native to the land. In a very surprising manner, the settlers formed new colonies in the wilderness and these establishments grew and
prospered. Before they had departed England, the colonists' terms of freedom and their relation to the mother country were fully settled; they were to
remain subject to the King and dependent on the kingdom of Great Britain. In return, they were to receive protection. They would also enjoy the ...
Eventually, the differences between the colonies and Britain became quite distinguishable and apparent. The ancestors of the early adventurers
experienced a different sort of liberty and patriotism in America than in its parent state. Suddenly though, this sense of self–rule came to an abrupt end.
Britain began challenging the autonomous rule that they had indirectly granted the colonies. John Locke argued that all individuals possessed certain
"natural rights" such as life, liberty, and property (Greene, 96). It was the responsibility of the government to protect those inalienable rights. When
Britain began imposing sanctions that limited the colonists' natural rights, it violated its responsibility to its dependents. Therefore, Locke's theory
provided an intellectual justification for resistance to British authority. Furthermore, Locke believed that if the government failed in preserving the
natural rights of the individual then rebellion is justified (Greene, 96). Due to the development of powerful colonial cities, the end of salutary neglect
of the colonies by Britain, and the increasing tension between Britain and the colonies, the American Revolution was inevitable.
What was once considered a territory of rural communities and towns grew to states consisting of large urban cities. As the society of the states became
more complex and integrated, dependence upon the parent country began to dwindle. As the states matured, their inhabitants were no

Of 'No Revolution Is Worth Anything Unless It Can...
A quote by Valdimir Lenin states, "No revolution is worth anything unless it can defend itself." We see this all the time in our world's history, and in
current situations across the globe. Groups of people whether they be leaders, dictators, soldiers, rulers, or even civilians are constantly trying to
defend themselves in their acts of war. Many are taking actions to ensure that their reason is heard, because without it, the only thing they are doing is
fighting for nothing. However, contrary to the statement by Lenin, I believe that if you wage a revolution for something, but have to constantly defend
your actions to everyone as to why you're not fallacious, your reason is not strong enough.
In cases like the American Revolution, when America

Colonial American Revolution
The Arab Spring was a series of uprisings in the Middle East beginning in the year 2011. The results of these revolutions are still being felt in places
present day such as Syria. The wave of uprisings began in Tunisia and slowly spread throughout the regions, with notable long lasting campaigns
involved in countries such as Syria, Libya and Egypt. The hope of political scientists at the time was that the Middle East has had enough of tyranny
and oppression and was finally taking control to overthrow the aggressors and institute democratic change. This was simply not the case, as Tunisia
was the only success story and the rest of the nations involved had their uprising crushed, or the country went into a period of a prolonged civil war.
There ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Syria there has been massive battles between rebel forces and the governmental forces. The problem is that the rebel forces are split into multiple
factions with different agendas. In some cases you have found that rebel forces may even be fighting one another. ISIS has even arose out of this
chaos further weakening the rebels chances of overthrowing the government because it splits the agenda into even more smaller fragments. The results
of this fragmentation are that Syria is now a shell of its former self. It is in a constant state of war and battle and prospects for the future are not looking

How Revolutions Within Europe Over A 500 Year Period
In his book, Charles Tilly seeks to determine the circumstances surrounding revolutions within Europe over a 500–year period. Tilly begins by defining
revolution and then presents his hypothesis that revolutions stem from the state's actions. According to the author, a revolution consists of two parts,
each broken into smaller parts of their own: a revolutionary situation and a revolutionary outcome.
A revolutionary situation will consist of three qualifiers. First, a group, or coalition of groups, puts forward a claim to control of the state. The group
coming forward must have a claim that cannot coexist with the current regime. This qualifier rules out issues between groups such as political parties
that are able to coexist with each other under a basic framework for government. Second, a substantial amount of citizens must give the group support.
If a group steps forward without support from the citizens then the power for that group to enact change is handicapped. Third, the rulers must be either
unable or unwilling to silence the group. The rulers usually face this situation when their military power has weakened or been spread too thin, giving
this definition of revolution a realist edge.
Revolutionary outcomes consist of four parts. Members of either side defecting to the other would be considered a revolutionary outcome as it would
swing state control into the favor of the group receiving the defectors. In addition, either the group coming forward can

An Analysis Of Barrington Moore 's Social Origins Of...
RESPONSE PAPER: WEEK 2
In Barrington Moore's book Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World, the ideas put
forward by the author mainly consider the political roles of landlords and peasants in the transformation of an agrarian society into a modern one. He
adopts a neo–Marxist approach to address the emergence of social classes and inter–class coalitions.
In chapter 4, Professor Moore argues that the gentry's failure to make the transition from preindustrial to commercial forms of farming plays an
important part in the undermining of the mandarin state and in the creation of new political. Furthermore, the traditional role of the scholar declined
and the power of the central government weakened, which resulted in the gentry taking the control of local affairs more and more in their own hands.
As local landlords gained more power, the countryside got more and more divided into warlord satrapies. This society, in which commercial influences
were eating away the peasant's proprietorship and concentrating wealth in the hands of a new social formation, produced a fusion between parts of the
old ruling class and new urban elements rising. It is this new class that would later become the main social basis for the Kuomintang. Moore argues
that the main basis for the Chinese revolution were both the land–short peasantry that was plagued by massive poverty, famines and debts and the
landlords that lost their raison d'ГЄtre. The

Essay on Failed Revolutions and Tyrants in Animal Farm
Failed Revolutions and Tyrants in Animal Farm
Animal Farm, by George Orwell was published in 1945, a crucial time in history because of Stalin's takeover of the Soviet Union and his exploitation of
the centralized communist government. This was in direct contradiction to the expected results of the Russian Revolution. Orwell felt that revolutions
fail because the end result is a change of tyrants and not of government. Orwell exemplifies this failure through the goals of the revolution and their
failure to meet them, the malfunction of Napoleon and Snowball's rule together, and Napoleon's disastrous reign.
The goals of the Revolution and the failure to meet them, is one way Orwell exemplifies his philosophy. Before the Revolution, ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Their malfunction as ruling figures is another way Orwell exemplifies his philosophy. Snowball comes across as the more compassionate and
charismatic of the two, where as Napoleon is the thinker and has more "depth of character." The two compete for power and use propaganda and
catchy slogans to gain control of the public majority.
Shortly after the Revolution, Snowball comes up with the plan to construct a windmill to make the lives of the inhabitants of Animal Farm easier.
Napoleon hides in the shadows per se until the puppies that he has taken and trained are old enough to act as a police force. Once they are old
enough, Napoleon has the dogs drive Snowball off the farm. He then takes credit for the idea of the windmill and proceeds to claim that he, not
Snowball, won the award at the Battle of Cowshed. Napoleon then informs the animals that Snowball was an enemy and was a threat to Animal Farm.
The animals are swayed by his propaganda and are fearful of his police dogs; this is what keeps him in power.
Napoleon's disastrous reign only supports Orwell's idea that revolutions always fail, tyrants are only replaced, and a new government is never
established. Napoleon is a cruel ruler who, fearful of Snowball's return, executes all the animals who "confess" to being in league with Snowball.
Napoleon uses Squealer as a propaganda spreader to the other animals of the farm. Squealer tells the animals how wonderful life is on the farm, when
in fact they

To What Extent Was The More Successful Than Somerset Of...
To what extent was Northumberland more successful than Somerset in ruling England during the reign of Edward VI?
During the reign of Edward VI, Northumberland and Somerset attempted to rule England. They dealt with several issues, including foreign policy,
finance, social and economic affairs, working as political operators and dealing with with rebellions. Northumberland proved to be successful in
many of these aspects, particularly in social and economic affairs as well as finance. This is because he was able to effectively correct the faults
Somerset had made such as introducing certain taxes and causing debt as well as debasement. This essay will talk about the extent of how successful
Northumberland was in comparison to Somerset when it came to ruling England.
It could be argued that Northumberland was far more successful than Somerset in ruling England due to Somerset's failure in foreign policy. For
example, Somerset thought that Scotland was the centre of his interests. His aim was for the scots to surrender the Scottish daughter, their queen to
marry Henry's son. He tried implementing this through the treaty of Greenwich in order to unite England and Scotland, but failed to meet his aim.
Although he did gain an achievement when the Scottish army were destroyed at the the Battle of Pinkie, his plans to wear down Scotland with forts
and Garrisons failed. It was expensive because garrisons needed to be established in Southern Scotland. As well as this, the forts that

An Essay About The World Of The Black, White, And Die Out...
So many tribes. So many factions. Straight, queer. Black, white. Male, Female. Tall, short. Fat, thin. Happy, unhappy. Trapped, free. Oppressed,
Liberated. Doubting, self–assured. Old, young. Birthing, dying. Wasted, realised. So many lives, so many stories. Some reach fruition, while others
are stifled never fulfilling their fullest potentials. Some of us are born into privilege and yet others live and and die out on the street. For the vast
majority of us however, we are born, we live what is termed an average life and we die. We become markers in a field someplace. There 's not a
single one of us however who shouldn 't be here. We each have our own reason for being. We are each a part of life and shouldn 't ever feel apart
from it. We are needed. Why then is there so much struggle? So much competition. Such a great need for supremacy and righteousness. Many of
us squander what we have here hoping for something better around the corner or perhaps in the next life. Paradise is here, all around us all of the
time, well it is in theory at least. I 'm fortunate to live in a part of the world which allows me freedoms. The freedom to live as I choose. The
freedom to write posts without having to worry about people turning up, taking away my basic rights to express myself and hauling me off to some
murky prison cell to languish and perhaps make me doubt my very existence. Even if that were the case, someone somewhere would be caring enough
to appeal for my conviction to be

Social Media and Democratic Reform
Social Media and Democratic Reform
I)In this paper I prove that the TedTalk related to Political and Cultural Globalization by focusing on social media use in The Pro–democracy
Revolution and how it has affected democratic reformation.
A)A comparative essay between the Jasmine Revolution of Tunisia and the JasmineRevolution of China.
B)How social media affected the outcomes of both of the revolutions.
1)Social Media was the leading force in Tunisia
2)Social Media did not win the Chinese Revolution
(a)Censorship of media held back the potential revolution
(b)Government Security prevented protests.
C)"A new generation, well educated, connected, inspired by universal values and a global understanding, has created a new ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
B)Blocking news/Searches for the word jasmine to prevent the Chinese from getting ideas into revolting.
1)Internet communication technology is not always beneficial to democracy.
2)"In essence, it would therefore appear that while social media have undoubtedly changed the political map, this may not necessarily have been in the
interests of the poorest and most marginalized – or even of democracy." (Unwin 5)
III)Military and Security
A)When expressing your feelings about authoritarian governments over social media one must be prepared to face consequences for their expression
of emotion.
1)Ali Weiwei arrested for speaking out publically against human rights issues. Showing a lack of democracy in China.
(a)Global Social Media recognition of the case pressured the government into a more democratic view on the case and releasing him from prison.
(Zheng 32)
2)Violence by Government Officials
B)Being proactive with security and censorship ultimately lead to the failure of the 2011 Chinese Jasmine Revolution.
1)Proactive using social media to anticipate protests.
(a)Undercover security already at protest sites
2)Blockages/bias of media

(a)Traditional media had a unidirectional and hierarchical structure in which the state could monopolize the production of content. (Abbott 335)
(a)Easy to manipulate into reporting

Perspectives Of The English Revolution
Perspectives of the English Revolution
The first bourgeois revolution in the history of Western Civilization took place in the seventeenth century in England. In 1640, began the Puritan
Revolution and in 1688, there was the Glorious Revolution. However, both belong to the same revolutionary process, which led to the denomination of
it as English Revolution and not English Revolutions, considering that the real revolution took place in the course of the Puritan Revolution between
1640 and 1649 and that the Glorious Revolution 1688 was only its natural complement. Since then, various approaches have resulted in different views
of the Revolution.
The Whig and Tory Tradition
In the eighteenth century the history of the English Revolution is viewed ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The crisis of the British socialist movement in the 30s, divided into social democratic and Marxists, stimulated the publications of the Left Wing. The
publication of A people's History of England by AL Morton (8) constituted the first major Marxist interpretation of English history.
The works of Christopher Hill by the quantity and quality make him the best Marxist historian of the first half of the seventeenth century. His first
study of this topic , "Soviet interpretation on the English Interregnum "(9), summarizes the positions of Soviets historians about class conflict in
England during the seventeenth century, involving the feudal aristocracy and the clergy proprietaries – shielded by agrarian power of the crown in one
hand and the progressive bourgeoisie and gentry in another.
In 1940, during the celebration of the 300 years of the Revolution English, C. Hill wrote the small but still until today the fundamental study on the
subject The English Revolution 1640. In it, the English Revolution is understood as a class struggle. It was revolutionary and progressive, while at the
same time the destruction of the monarchy meant the abolition of the barriers to the development of the country and to the constitution of a more
advanced social and political structure. C. Hill insisted

A Critical Thinker By Asking Questions
To exists and live on our terms we must convert our life into a creative project. Only by doing this can we sufficiently challenge ourselves to reach
our full potential and figure out what it is that we want to dedicate our life to and how we wish to leave a mark in history. To make our life into a
creative project, we must consistently set goals and to be a critical thinker by asking questions. Unfortunately, some obstacles prevent us from living
our life on our terms. Dependency and legitimacy are why others have authority over us; however, once we are forced or reasoned to do something, be
someone, etc. they lose that power, and that's the time that we must take action. We are consistently ruled by others and the "norms" that society
established whether it is knowingly or unconsciously. The fact that others rule us can eventually cause us to feel alienated and once we recognize that
isolation, we begin to rebel. For people to shift from being heteronomy to autonomy, each must go through the Phenomenology of Rebellion. The
Phenomenology of Rebellion has four steps: alienation, recognition, confusion, destruction and rebellion. Recognizing that you can be more than you
or others think is necessary to the process of autonomy. Asking questions and being a critical thinker helps become more aware of the broken social
contract that governs us. We become more conscious of what needs to be fix, change and begin to realize that together we have the power to make
these changes. But

Between 1600 and 1700 the American Colonies Were Shaken by...
During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries colonial America experienced a number of rebellions by various groups for a variety of reasons. The
protests took place in Virginia, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New York. Each protest began for a different reason, however, all involved the discontent
that some groups underwent in the colonies. Some of the most notable rebellions include Bacon's Rebellion, The Regulator Uprising, Leislor's
Rebellion, Culpepper's Rebellion, and the Paxton Boys Uprising. The Paxton Boy Revolt, which occurred in Pennsylvania, was a response to Pontiac's
Rebellion, one of the greatest Indian Uprisings to ever happen. The Paxton Boys felt that the government of colonial Pennsylvania that was mainly
controlled ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Edmund Andros the governor prior to the Glorious Revolution was known for being an extremely strict man that strongly supported the Navigation
acts and this is one reason why he was overthrown by Leislor. The rebellion established a rebellious attitude towards British domination, and
reinforced the idea that the colonies were subject to British rule by their free will. The War of Regulation was caused by corruption in the
government. Officials were unfair and corrupt. Many of the officers were deemed to be very greedy and oftentimes would band together with
other local officials for their own personal gain as they sometimes stole tax money along with other things. This war ended with the rebels winning
and the regulators were forced to leave. This rebellion was different from the other rebellions for the fact that it did play a role in giving people the
confidence to have an American Revolution as the regulators ended up becoming tories while the rebels ended up becoming patriots. The causes of
this rebellion were similar to the others as people were unsatisfied with the way the colony was being ran. Culpepper's Rebellion was a revolt where
Thomas Miller, an official attempted to take control of a large portion of the Carolinas (later would be known as North America). A counter party was
formed that was led by John Culpepper. This party would evtually improsen Miller and have him

Russia and Latin America's Responses to Industrialization ...
In the 19th century, Russia and Latin America responded similarly to industrialization in the formation of a growing middle class, in a "boom" in
exports and new economic ties, in urbanization, and in similar acts of revolutionary disobedience against a dictator. Latin America, as a result of
industrialization, created a small market for manufactured goods unlike Russia's vast industrial market powered by foreign investments. Also, there
were long–term effects to Russia's revolution in which a socialist political party was created as a result of industrialization, unlike Latin America which
was immobilized with regional conflicts and factionalism.
The globalization of industrialization began in Britain, spread throughout continental ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This contributed to large–scale strikes that inspired a group of intellectual Russians, founded in the concepts of Marxist socialism, to make plans for
reformation. In the late nineteenth century, these workers began the process of social change in educating laborers, organizing unions, and, later on,
taking revolutionary measures to improve workers' conditions.In addition, workers in Moscow and St. Petersburg, the cities that were the main focus of
industrial enterprises, created their own representative councils (soviets) which organized peasant uprisings, revolts of non–Russians, and student
demonstrations. The cause of this unrest was largely due to the tyrannic authority of the tsar, who was a symbol of Russia's "backwardness" in that
there was no national parliament, legalized political parties, nor nationwide elections due to his absolute authority. Thus, Russia, as a response to
industrialization, experienced an economic "boom" in their formation of major industries to export goods; in order to develop the new industrial
centers, a middle class also grew to encompass the growth of industry. Also, due to the prominent growth of factory workers due to industrialization,
revolutions occurred in order

Historical Impact Of 1968
THE IMPACT OF 1968
The world revolution of 1968 of course primarily concerned a series of major political issues: the hegemony of the United States and its world
policies, which had led it into the Vietnam war; the relatively passive attitude of the Soviet Union, which the 1968 revolutionaries saw as "collusion"
with the United States; the inefficacy of the traditional Old Left movements in opposing the status quo. In retrospect, 1968, the year of global revolt
halfway between the end of World War II and the end of theCold War, looked like a failed revolution. Nonetheless, the impacts of 1968 formulated
ever gradually progressing definitions of today's world–system.
The change protagonists attributed for in the belief of a common cause, opposing the domestic and international status quo establishments in the name
of participatory democracy, political freedom, and personal self–determination, were fundamentally doomed from the basic cornerstones of their
initiations. Thus, the main objectives of stopping the autocracy of the state to decentralize its foundations to clear a path to economic and political
power distributions of a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although adhering to the system fundamentally, it had the willingness to reform it gradually. Thus, was required to bifurcate from the new
generations impetuses of radical revolution. Despite both alluring for a social change they saw as essential to ending the exploitation of the lower
class by the upper class, the Old Left's conservative features saw the requirement of an existential social order to balance the system. Therefore they
were not willing to abandon the social order the New Left were seeking to mutilate. Thus, no matter how much they sought to exonerate the working
class they retained reformists alternatives to that of revolutionary aspirations of

The Hunger Games Catching Fire
People will never guess what The Hunger Games Catching Fire is actually about. The Hunger Games Catching Fire, by Suzanne Collins, is a book
based on the theme that ruling in fear leads to revolt. Everyone who's read it knows that it's a book about Katniss Everdeen and her survival of all the
Capitol's plans, but it has an underlying theme throughout the book. Author Suzanne Collins is trying to convey that ruling in fear leads to revolt.
Throughout the book, the Capitol uses fear to try to subdue the districts and Katniss, to no avail. What happens next is predictable. An insurrection that
brings down the Capitol's 75 year reign down. In Catching Fire, Suzanne Collins shows that ruling in fear will eventually result in an endgame of
revolution because her usage of dialogue and dramatic irony at the right time and place conveys the theme.
In the second book of the Hunger Games trilogy, it depicts with the usage of dialogue that ruling in fear leads to defection of the populus because
when the victors are forced to go back to the arena, they lash out and attack President Snow and the government verbally. In the book, it was the 75th
hunger games, which meant for that special year, the strongest of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The scenes that show Katniss finally understanding the victors rage and the one where she learns about the riots in the districts from her prep team
reinforce the theme Collins is trying to convey to the readers. The theme that ruling in fear leads to a surge of insurgents is quite important for the
readers to understand because it can help them make better decisions in the future by not leading with fear. To conclude, after reading this, readers
should finally know what the Hunger Games Catching Fire is actually

Essay
terrorism seems to be on an incline in society, people are worried about their safety. Tiffany Howard, author of Failed States and the Origins of
Violence, states that "the climate of state fragility as the ideal environment to give rise to political violence, especially leading to terrorism." In the
end, the state will be consumed by violence. This violence will start out internally with people being denied goods and services, and then the
government will lose credibility. Ultimately, creating a lose of trust and power in the government. The people of the nations will abandon the law,
hoping to reap some benefits from the new coup–group. Corruption will prosper, where there is an ineffective government. Unfortunately, Congo
government... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many questions could be asked about the governance of the democratic republic of Congo. However, through my research it has come to my attention,
the necessary ones. Through Congo history of poor governance and dictatorship, one should ask, Is Congo governable? Or is it doomed to be a failed
State? In most areas of life, the past always repeats itself. When looking at the geographical studies of Congo, one must ask, is the physical
geography an impediment to the countries? Is it possible for a country to operate when there are only urban or upper class people receiving services
from the government? The question of the countries historical importance and geographical perspective is key to solving the problem of Congo. Why
is the State of Congo so powerful in the daily lives of the poeple of the urban cities wronged by colonial oppression, dictatorship, economic
underdevelopment and much more problems affecting the country?
To answer my research question, I will create a questionnaire in urban and rural areas of the Democratic Republic of Congo that will ask
semi–structured questions. Also, it will be important to look at data that represents the social/public service issues, the inability of the government, and
placement of people compared to geography. Nevertheless, I will go to the national

The Film Olga Directed by Jaime Monjardim
Conflicted Brazil Olga (2002), a Brazilian film directed by Jaime Monjardim and the book Olga: Revolutionary and Martyr (2004) written by
Fernando Moraes are written and visual work which holds the information of Brazil in their view, that occurred before and after the Revolution of
1930. Along with film by Monjardim and a book by Moraes, article like Luis Carlos Prestes and the Revolution of 1924 by Ernest A. Duff and a book,
Vargas andBrazil by Hentsche, Jen R also provides a precious information on the revolution of Brazil. As the revolution started, it came along with the
major change in political that as a side effect caused a change in social and economical within the country. Tired of financial and economic issues faced
by Brazilians during the regime of Old Republic, the tenentes, who were the lower military officers that could intervene in the economic development,
finally brought their rule to an end through the "Revolution of 1930" which "won the respect and loyalty of large elements of the civilian population in
rural areas" (Duff 13), that also brings Getulio Vargas into the power. Tenentes, as already experienced the economy downfall during the regime of Old
Republic, "wanted to overcome the country's backwardness and dependency by installing a strong, interventionist state that promoted industrialization
and national integration." (Jens R. 4) By then Prestes, the organizer of Tenentes, who attempted to overthrow the government of Brazil in 1924 through

Essay on Failure of the Italian Revolutions
The failure of the Italian revolutions cannot be attributed to one reason as there are a plethora of reasons which could be cited as a main cause. The
main reasons which could be argued as the most important reasons for the failure of the Italian revolts are the lack of organisation within revolutionary
groups, the Austrian army's strength, the political and military inexperience of those in power, the Pope's abandonment of the revolution, the hesitation
of Charles Albert to front the campaign of unity and Bonaparte's intervention. In 1815 Italy was not recognised as a country, Metternich, an Austrian
statesman, said "The word 'Italy' is a geographical expression, a description which is useful shorthand, but has none of the political ... Show more
The Carbonari, in 1820, participated in a revolt in Naples against King Ferdinand's government where the peasants and even the royal troops took part.
Terrified of the revolting people, King Ferdinand vowed to give all adult males the vote through a constitution. However, he had no intention of doing
this and did not grant adult men the vote. Ferdinand told the Congress of Laibach that he had been forced to grant change and requested the Austrians
to help regain order within his country. Metternich sent the superior Austrian army into Naples where they easily overcame the rebels. The savage
treatment of his people caused uproar and in 1821 the peasants took over Turin, the capital of Sardinia–Piedmont, causing the king (Victor Emmanuel)
to relinquish his role and hand power to his nephew, Charles Albert. Victor's brother, Charles Felix was unhappy with Charles Albert acting as
Victor's replacement and asked Metternich to help him stop the revolts. The Austrian Army marched in again and controlled the peasants but Charles
Albert was forced to flee due to his promise of change to the rebels. There were more revolts in Modena, Parma and the Papal States in 1831 led by
the Carbonari but yet again the Austrian army quelled them. Also, when Charles Albert reclaimed power in Sardinia there was hope he would support
liberal ideas but he left people disillusioned by his cowardice in not supporting reform so not to

Failed Revolutions in "Office Space"
The film "Office Space" depicts several employees at a software firm trying and failing at rebelling against the company they work for. The revolutions
against the management and their subsequent failures are explained by Karl Marx's theories on the proletariat and bourgeoisie in The Communist
Manifesto. The problem that the workers encountered was a result of not going far enough in their attempts at improving their lives. In proving the
failed rebellions of the employees can be explained by The Communist Manifesto, it must first be proven that the movie accurately represents the
struggle between the proletariat and bourgeoisie classes. In this movie the employees at Initech and their upper management represent the continuation
of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The working conditions and their effects make the working class "enslaved by the machine" and "by the overlooker" (Marx Ch. 1). These first
type of enslavement is seen in the film by Peter Gibbons' computer taking minutes to save his files, preventing him from escaping his boss. This
leads to the second type with the boss telling Peter he needs to work Saturday and Sunday (Office Space). The workers at Initech, especially the
main character, can be accurately described as members of the proletariat as described by Marx. It has now been proven that in the film the bosses
accurately represent the bourgeoisie and the employees accurately represent the proletariat. Now it must be shown that the actions of the bosses and
employees can be explained through Marx's theory on conflict between the proletariat and bourgeoisie. The laying off of employees is done to
maximize profit as it is cheaper to hire "entry–level graduates" and "farm some work in Singapore" instead of paying people who have worked at
Initech for years (Office Space). This drive to maximize profits is so the "markets [keep] ever growing, demand ever rising," which is what fuels
the "modern bourgeois" (Marx Ch. 1). Marx writes that these kinds of actions of the bourgeoisie will eventually make "man...face with sober senses
his real conditions of his life, and his relation with his kind" (Marx Ch. 1)... This is a key plot event in the film, wherein Peter Gibbons is freed from

A Brief Note On The World War II
Monika Gruca
Professor Moore
History 150
9 May 2015
Final Exam
Part I: Identifications
1.Fascism–
Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power. It is usually emphasized by aggressive nationalism and often racism. Two
countries that adopted fascism were Germany and Italy. Germany was under the leadership of Adolf Hitler, while Italy was under Benito Mussolini.
Fascism led both countries to have extreme nationalism and instilled a great sense of pride in both countries. This great national pride can be seen
during the initial years of World War II. Both countries took aggressive actions in Europe and Africa because of their national pride.
2.Calvinism–
Calvinism was a branch of Protestantism formed by John ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Bismarck was a master political strategist who was able to make many alliances that helped secure Germany security. Following German unification
Germany became one of the most powerful nations in Europe.
4.The Black Plague–
The Black Plague or popularly know as the "Black Death" was one of the most horrifying and deadly diseases in human history. Between 75 and 200
million people were estimated to have died. From 1346 to 1353 the Black Death was expanding across Europe. The Plague created religious, social,
and economic problems all across Europe.
5.Glorious Revolution–
The Glorious Revolution also called the Bloodless Revolution occurred between 1688–1689. This resulted in the deposition of James II and the
accession of his daughter Mary II and her husband William III who was the prince of Orange and stadholder of the Netherlands. With their ascension to
the throne came the constitutionalized English Bill of Rights of 1689. The revolution permanently established Parliament as the main ruling power of
England.
Part II: Essays
2. Nationalism

At the beginning of the 19th century there was a turn from religious loyalty or loyalty given to a particular leader towards loyalty owed to a particular
nation. Nationalism came from the formation of the public sphere. It allowed for the institution of patriotic symbols such as national songs, literature,
and emblems. The French Revolution was the first to institute the idea of a nation–state, in which the

What Was The Immediate Effects Of The 1848 Revolution In...
Throughout history there has always been revolutions, change, and reforms. In 1832, England experienced the death of George IV and accession of
William IV in 1830 ,that resulted in a general parliamentary election in which the opposition political party, the Whigs, scored major gains with their
platform calling for parliamentary reform. With the Tory party divided, the king asked the leader of the Whigs, Earl Grey, to form a government.
Immediately, the Whigs introduced a major reform bill designed to increase the number of voters by 50 percent and to eliminate underpopulated
electoral districts ("rotten boroughs") and replace them with representatives for previously unrepresented manufacturing districts and cities, especially
in the industrial... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Austrian Empire was vulnerable to revolutionary challenge. The new Austrian Empire was a collection of subject nationalities (more non–Germans
than Germans) stirred by acute nationalism, its government was reactionary, meaning liberal institutions were nonexistent, and its reliance on
serfdom doomed the mass of people to misery. As soon as the news of of the February days in France reached the borders of the empire, rebellions
began. In document 6, it shows a Presentation of a Bill by a Hungarian Diet to Emperor Ferdinand I of Austria. This document describes the revolt
against freedom and independence that was granted to them. It also shares how the military risked their lives to suppress a rebellion. Most of the
citizens are revolting and not compromising to their rules, and that then caused violence such as, villages that are burned down and massacres
occurring. The main purpose of this document is to show how the people can become violent if pushed enough. People in this time turned to violence,
because they wanted a change and still wasn't granted their freedoms. In document 7, Louis Kossuth discusses his "Address to the People of United
States, March 1850". It shows how abominable the government can be towards the people. He informs people that the government is plotting against
them, and that they are going to have to defend themselves. The complete purpose of this document is inform and protect each

Charles Tilly And State Failure
The notion of state failure was introduced into international politics around 1990 (Call, 2008; 1491). Its characteristics are described by a few
scholars, however, the focus of this essay is Robert Rotberg's definition and discussion of the concept. As well as that, Charles Tilly's criticism will be
introduced. To begin with, according to Rotberg, state failure isn't caused by accidents, but it is poor leadership decisions and leadership failures that
gradually make the state weaker (2002; 93). He points out that "nation–states fail because they can no longer deliver positive political goods to their
people. Their governments lose legitimacy and (...) the nation–state itself becomes illegitimate" (Rotberg, 2002; 85). State capacity, as defined by
Charles Tilly, "is the extent of governmental agents' control over changes in the condition of persons, activities, and resources within the territory over...
In fact, the extent of the failure can be defined by the amount of territory which is out of state's control (Rotberg, 2002; 86). One can notice a
connection between the lack of legitimate authority and an increase in criminal violence, which also indicates state failure (Rotberg, 2002; 87). This
further perpetuates violence against the regime from the side of insurgencies and other groups wanting to take over the country, while anarchy becomes
the norm. (Rotberg, 2002; 85, 87). Furthermore, even though the escalation of conflicts might have its roots in "ethnic, religious, linguistic, or other
intercommunal enmity", Rotberg argues that it is not the primary cause of state failure (2002; 86). In his article The new nature of nationвЂђstate
failure, Rotberg further mentions a few failed countries, as well as examples of weak countries on the verge of failure, overall stating that there are
many indicators which could define a state as

Fragile States : Causes And Impact
Question 1: Fragile States – Causes & Impact. Discuss the characteristics of a state described as "fragile", "failing", or failed and address the possible
causes of state failure as well as the "danger signs" that might warn of impending failure. No global definition exists for states described as "fragile",
"failing", or failed because they come in all shapes and sizes. Yet, countries that have failed at the basic responsibilities of governance and sovereign
authority are generally lumped into this group. Fragile, failing, or failed states share similar characteristics including their inability to control their
borders, loss of authority over insurgents, gangs, and warlords, and loss of legitimacy internally/internationally. Examples relevant today of countries
that are fragile or failing, and on the path to failed status include Iraq and many of the Middle Eastern countries struggling to maintain their autonomy
in the fight against ISIS. Other important indicators of failed states include: 1.Inability to provide external security 2.Incompetent police force
3.Unprofessional bureaucracy 4.Corrupt judicial system 5.Unaccountable military 6.Inability to create and deliver positive political goods
7.Deteriorating infrastructure 8.Inability to collect taxes 9.Unregulated financial system 10.Inability to gather and maintain statistics The distinction
between fragile, failing, and failed remains difficult to decipher since many of the same characteristics come into

Why Nova Scotia Failed to Join the American Revolution
Abstract: This essay discusses why Nova Scotia failed to join the American Revolution. It discusses the social, political, economic, geographic, as well
as religious factors that led to Nova Scotians' lack of attachment to revolutionary ideology in the colonies.
During the time of the American Revolution, Nova Scotia was geographically on the northeastern frontier of Massachusetts. No geographical feature
separated Nova Scotia from Maine, which meant that the Canadian province was very much a part of the Massachusetts colony. The question remains,
therefore, why Nova Scotia failed to join the American Revolution in 1776. There were, after all, many new Englanders in Nova Scotia, and it remains
a serious question as to why they did not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Indeed, while Nova Scotians were close to the events themselves, the settlements in Nova Scotia were scattered along the edges of the long, narrow
peninsula. The sea was the only road between settlements. In many respects, therefore, there simply could not have been a united Nova Scotia.
Because of this fact, it made it difficult for Nova Scotia to join in the War for Independence. People did not really feel united enough to have a serious
cause. (Rawlyck, p.220)
Thus, though Nova Scotia was very much attached to Main and to the Massachusetts colony, the geographical structure of the colony left Nova Scotia
quite isolated from neighboring towns. Meanwhile, the British controlled the North Atlantic. One cannot deny, therefore, a factor of intimidation in
this context, therefore, for even if some Nova Scotians did support the Yankees, they felt the presence of British troops in Halifax. The colony was
simply dominated by a strong British military presence and a support for the Revolution would have sparked fear amongst any who sympathized with
it. (Brebner, p.261) Nova Scotians were well aware that there would be a military confrontation with the British and no issue was really worth this
danger.
In any case, even if Nova Scotians had wanted to participate in the Revolution, they did not really have the military means to do so in any case. They
were weak militarily and the strong British military presence made it virtually impossible for any sort of

Christian World View
Crystal Cook
April 12, 2012
CWV101–Crawford
Family Television Review
The situation comedy that highlights family values and functions for this Family Television Review is the show called The Parkers. The name of
the family is The Parkers which is a family with a single mother and a daughter both attending college. Observations of the family lead me to the
conclusion that their worldview is between a naturalism and secular worldview. While watching the show The Parkers I have observe that The
Parkers live they life base off naturalism and secular because they are fulfilling their dreams in life regardless of what people might say or believe.
On the following episode e the the mother Nikki Parkers truly believes her and the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
We both value that education is very important and will need it to farther ourselves farther in life. The Nicky character is not like me as a mother
to a certain degree because I personally know when I'm not wanted. My family is my first priority just like Kim is Nikki first priority on the show.
The show did not impact my view on what a family is because we had similar views on how we raised our family to get all they can out of life. We
do things that make us happy and make me feel good as a person. I value all the time I have with my girls because I never know what might happen to
them or me. I attended church because I know it is the right thing to do and I know God is a key component to everything I do in life. The Parkers had a
small positive influence on me about what a family is because Nikki always put God first and everything else fell in place. The Parkers show made
me realize that family is all you have and you have to spend time with them because children remember time spent not money spent. I would not
change how I do things with my girls because they love me and I love

Failed Revolutions in "Office Space"
The film "Office Space" depicts several employees at a software firm trying and failing at rebelling against the company they work for. The revolutions
against the management and their subsequent failures are explained by Karl Marx's theories on the proletariat and bourgeoisie in The Communist
Manifesto. The workers were not going far enough in their attempts to improve their lives. In proving the failed rebellions of the employees can be
explained by The Communist Manifesto, it must first be proven that the movie accurately represents the proletariat and bourgeoisie classes and their
struggle. In this movie the employees at Initech, especially the main character Peter Gibbons, and their upper management, specifically Bill Lumbergh,
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The working conditions and their effects make the working class "enslaved by the machine" and "by the overlooker" (Marx). These two types of
enslavement are seen in the film by Peter Gibbons' computer taking minutes to save his files, which prevents him from escaping his boss, who then
tells Peter he needs to work Saturday and Sunday (Office Space). The workers at Initech, especially the main character, are now shown to be accurate
representations of the proletariat as described by Marx. It has now been proven that in the film the bosses accurately represent the bourgeoisie and the
employees accurately represent the proletariat, now it must be shown that the actions of the bosses and employees can be explained through Marx's
theory on conflict between the proletariat and bourgeoisie. The laying off of employees is done to maximize profit as it is cheaper hiring "entry–level
graduates" and "farm some work in Singapore" instead of people who have work at Initech for years (Office Space). This drive to maximize profits
is so the "markets [keep] ever growing, demand ever rising," which is what fuels the "modern bourgeois" (Marx). Marx writes that these kinds of
actions of the bourgeoisie will eventually make "man...face with sober senses his real conditions of his life, and his relation with his kind" (Marx)...
This is a key plot event in the film, wherein Peter

How Revolutions Caused The Negative Western Influences On...
Revolutions, whether successful or not, inevitably change the place in which they happen. In the early 20th century, nearly all of Africa was colonized
by European powers. Colonialism, and Africans' ill feelings toward being colonized, inspired unity, desire for social change, and an urge for
independence. Revolutions were imminent in Africa due to the strict policies of segregation, social structure, and feelings of superiority that the
Europeans brought. These feelings were ingrained in many people both consciously and sub–consciously. Many Africans, after independence, fell back
into this old routine and when the white populations left, these feelings of superiority and the old social structure continued to manifest itself Africa,
only in a new form. This was, and continues to be Africa's biggest problem today. The goal ofrevolution, and independence in Africa was to purge the
negative western influences and attitudes that Europeans had put in place. However, even after independence, the same European powers, and their
conglomerates continued to influence the governments and people. Many people of Africa fell back into their old ways and had similar thought
processes under colonial rule. These fallbacks included superiority of men over women, social status, and the other obligations that one has to society.
As Winston Churchill famously remarked "Those that fail to learn history, are doomed to repeat it." It was this recession back into the European
guidelines that

Objective Violence

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Juanita Conklin

More from Juanita Conklin (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Objective Violence