GMEF People Entry Point

1. 1_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE-PEOPLE
DESCRIPTORS SCORE Score
per item
Means of Verification/Remarks
NO PARTLY YES
1. On the Establishment of GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates (max score: 5; for each item, .083)
1.1. Has the
organization
designated people in
strategic positions as
members of its GAD
Focal Point System
(GFPS)? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
The organization has
yet to identify key
people to be members
of its GFPS
Some members of
the GFPS occupy
strategic positions in
the organization
Majority of the
members of the
GFPS occupy
strategic positions in
the organization
0.83 If Yes, please provide details on the policy formalizing the
creation/reconstitution of the organization’s GAD Focal Point System
(GFPS) and attach a copy for validation.
Refer to GFPS polocy
If no, please explain why the organization has not identified people in
strategic positions who can be members of its GAD Focal Point System
(GFPS)?
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
1.2. Has the
organization’s GAD
Focal Point System
(GFPS) members
attended appropriate
and relevant trainings
on GAD? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
GFPS members have
not attended any of
the basic GAD
trainings [Gender
Sensitivity Trainings
(GST), Gender
Analysis (GA) and GA
Tools and GAD
Planning and
Budgeting]
GFPS members
attended 1-2 basic
[Gender Sensitivity
Trainings (GST),
Gender Analysis (GA)
and GA Tools and
GAD Planning and
Budgeting]
GFPS members
attended all three
basic GAD trainings
[Gender Sensitivity
Trainings (GST),
Gender Analysis (GA)
and GA Tools and
GAD Planning and
Budgeting
0.83 Please list down GAD trainings attended by GAD Focal Point System
members.
Title of GAD
Training
Number
and Profile
of
Participant
s
Trainer/
Institutional
Provider
Date

2. 2_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
1.3. Has the
organization’s top
management attended
Basic GAD Orientation
or Gender Sensitivity
Training (GST)?
(possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83)
Top management not
yet attended GAD
orientation or GST
Only selected
members of the top
management/
attended Basic GAD
Orientation or GST
All top management
officials attended
Basic GAD
Orientation or GST
0.41 Please list down top management official/s who attended Basic GAD
Orientations/Gender Sensitivity Trainings (GSTs)
Name
of Top
Manag
ement
Official
Basic
GAD
Orientati
on/GST
Attended
Institution
al/Trainin
g Provider
Date
1.4. Has the
organization’s staff
members been
oriented on GAD?
(possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83)
Less than 50% of the
organization’s staff
members attended
Basic GAD Orientation
or GST
50-99% of the
organization’s staff
GAD Orientation or
GST
100% of the
organization’s staff
members attended
GAD Orientation or
GST
0 Please attach training profile of the organization’s staff members.
Provide list
1.5. Are the
organization’s top
management and GAD
Focal Point System
(GFPS) members
aware and conscious
of GAD-related policies
and mandates?
(possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83)
Top management and
GFPS are not yet
aware and conscious
of GAD-related
policies and mandates
Some GFPS
members are aware
and conscious of
GAD-related policies
and mandates
Some top
management and all
GFPS members are
aware and conscious
of GA- related
policies and
mandates
0.41 If yes, please explain how the top management and GFPS manifest
awareness and consciousness of GAD related policies and mandates.
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

3. 3_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
1.6. Does the
organization’s top
management allow
staff members to
participate in GAD-
related
activities?(possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
Top management
does not allow staff
members to participate
in GAD-related
activities
Top management
allows only the GFPS
to participate in GAD-
related activities
Top management
allows all key
officials, GFPS
members and staff
members to
participate in GAD-
related activities
0.83 GAD-
related
Activity
Participants Organize
r
Date
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 1 People)
3.31
2. GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities (max score: 5; for each item: 0.83)
2.1. Does the top
management direct the
implementation of the
GAD Plan and Budget
(GAD PB) of the
organization? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
Top management not
supportive of GAD PB
implementation
Top management
approves GAD PB
but not visible during
critical/significant
GAD activities
Top management
approves GAD PB
and attends critical
/significant GAD
activities (e.g. setting
of GAD agenda,
strategic planning on
GAD, etc.)
0.83 Please cite critical incidents showing top management directing the
implementation of the organization’s GAD Plan and Budget (GAD PB)?
Please attach relevant documents indicating support of top management
to GAD (attendance sheet, copy of Opening/Closing Remarks during
GAD trainings, photos taken during GAD trainings, etc.)
Attach MOV –Admin Council, (picture, opening remarks)
2.2. Are program
implementers trained
on gender analysis
(GA) and the use of
gender analysis (GA)
tools? (possible scores
Program implementers
not yet trained on GA
and use of GA tools
Only selected (some)
program
implementers trained
on GA and use of GA
tools
All program
implementers trained
on GA and use of GA
tools
0.41 Please enumerate trainings on Gender Analysis (GA) and Gender
Analysis (GA) Tools attended by program implementers
Title of GA
training
Participants Trainer/I
nstitutio
nal
Date

4. 4_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) Provider
Please also attach training design and attendance sheets of trainings on
gender analysis (GA) and gender analysis (GA) tools attended by
program implementers.
2.3. Are concerned
staff members trained
to collect sex-
disaggregated data
(SDD)? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
Concerned staff
members not yet
trained to collect SDD
Concerned staff
members trained to
collect SDD
Concerned staff
members trained to
collect and are
collecting SDD
0.41 Please list down trainings conducted for concerned staff members on
the collection of sex-disaggregated data.
Title of
Training
Participants Date Conducted
2.4. Are male
employees involved
and appreciative of the
organization’s GAD
efforts? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
Male employees do
not yet participate in
the organization’s
GAD efforts
Male employees
participate in the
organization’s GAD
efforts
Male employees
initiate and participate
in the organization’s
GAD efforts
0.41 Please provide list of the organization’s efforts initiated and/or
participated by male employees:
GAD Effort/s Type of
Involvement of
Male
Employees
Participants

5. 5_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
*Type of Involvement of Male Employees: as participants, organizers and/or resource
persons in the conduct of the organization’s GAD efforts.
2.5. Are clients
(internal and external)
oriented on the GAD
efforts of the
organization? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
Clients are not
oriented on the GAD
efforts of the
organization
Either internal or
external clients
oriented on the GAD
efforts of the
organization
Both internal and
external clients
oriented on the GAD
efforts of the
organization
0.83 If yes, please identify the organization’s efforts to orient clients on the
GAD efforts of the organization (e.g. PCW website, news, GAD corner in
the organization, social media (FB, twitter); among others.
Activity Targeted Audience Date
Conducted
SH Orientation
Please also attach results of assessment or surveys conducted to
measure awareness of clients (internal and external) on the GAD efforts
of the organization, if applicable.
2.6. Are the clients
(internal and external)
able to articulate their
gender needs/issues in
the development of the
organization’s GAD
efforts? (possible
Clients (internal and
external) not able to
articulate gender
needs/issues in the
development of the
organization’s GAD
efforts
Either internal or
external clients
articulate gender
issues/needs in the
development of the
organization’s GAD
efforts
Both internal and
external clients
articulate gender
issues/needs in the
development of the
organization’s GAD
efforts
0.41 Please attach documentation of consultations/meetings (e.g. survey,
focus group discussions, key informant interviews) and list of issues
raised by clients (internal and external) during consultations, etc.
Student – raising of GST, attach minutes of the mtg.

6. 6_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 2 People)
3.3
3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs (max score: 5; for each item: .83)
3.1. Does the top
management direct
integration of GAD in
the organization’s
program/activities/proje
cts (PAPs) and
performance
indicators? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
No initial discussion
among top
management officials
on the integration of
GAD in the
organization’s PAPs
and performance
indicators
With initial discussion
among top
management officials
regarding integration
of GAD in the
organization’s PAPs
and performance
indicators
Top management
issued directive/s to
integrate GAD in the
organization’s PAPs
and performance
indicators
0.41 Please attach directive/s issued by top management to integrate GAD in
the organization’s program/activities/projects (PAPs) and performance
indicators
Issued directive on excursion or field trip (Dr. Gascon), reg Madlum
incident
3.2. Are the GFPS and
program implementers
able to integrate GAD
in the development of
the organization’s
program/activities/pro
jects (PAPs)?
(possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83)
GFPS and program
implementers not able
to integrate GAD in the
development of the
organization’s PAPs
Either GFPS or
program
implementers able to
integrate GAD in the
development of the
organization’s PAPs
Both the GFPS and
program
implementers able to
integrate GAD in the
development of the
organization’s PAPs
0.41 Please enumerate organization program/activities/projects (PAPs) and
performance indicators integrated with GAD perspective by GFPS
members and program implementers.
Responsible
Unit
Organization
PAPs
GAD
Perspective
Integrated
Remarks
GFPS
Program
Implementer

7. 7_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
s
NSTP –
Curriculum
3.3. Are concerned
staff members able to
utilize sex-
disaggregated data
(SDD) for gender
analysis (GA) to
enhance the
organization’s GAD
efforts? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
Concerned staff
members not yet able
to utilize SDD for GA
Concerned staff
members utilized
SDD for GA
Concerned staff
members utilized
SDD for GA and
recommend ed
strategies to enhance
the organization’s
GAD efforts
0 If yes, please explain how concerned staff members utilize sex-
disaggregated data for gender analysis to enhance the organization’s
GAD efforts.
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
Type of SDD P/A/P where SDD
was Applied
GAD Efforts
Enhanced
3.4. Does the top
management support
the appointment of
qualified women staff
members to leadership
positions?
(possible scores are 0,
0.41, and 0.83)
Top management
support to qualified
women staff members
inadequate
Top management
support to qualified
female staff members
limited to provision of
relevant trainings
Top management
support to qualified
female staff members
includes issuance of
relevant directives,
provision of relevant
trainings, mentoring
and others
0.41 Please attach documents issued by top management supporting the
appointment of qualified women staff members in leadership positions
(e.g. department order or executive orders, trainings available and kinds
of training etc.).
ID promotion, list of qualified staff

8. 8_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
3.5. Do women
assume critical roles
and authority in the
organization? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
Women occupy less
than 50% of the third
level, and middle
management and
technical positions in
the organization
Women occupy less
than 50% of third
level positions but
comprise 50% or
more of the middle
management and
technical positions in
the organization
Women occupy 50%
or more of the third
level positions in the
organization
0.41 Please identify the number of employees in the following position:
Position No. of
Men
No. of
Women
% of
Women
Top Management
Middle
Management
Technical Staff
Data on Director and Deans- c/o HR
3.6. Are the clients
(internal and external),
able to participate in
the planning and
implementation of the
organization’s GAD
efforts? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41, and
0.83)
No client (internal and
external) involvement
in the planning and
implementation of the
organization’s GAD
efforts
Either internal or
external clients
participate in the
planning and
implementation of the
organization’s GAD
efforts
Both internal and
external clients
participate in the
planning and
implementation of the
organization’s GAD
efforts
0.83 If yes, please describe how clients participate in the planning and
implementation of the organization’s GAD efforts.
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
Please attach attendance sheets and documentation of meetings, as
applicable.
Please also attach documents external clients’ membership in the
technical working groups (TWGs) and project management offices

9. 9_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
(TWGs).
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 3 People)
2.47
4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers (max score: 5; for each item: 0.83)

10. 10_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
4.1. Are the GAD Focal
Point System (GFPS)
members able to serve
as GAD resource
persons within the
organization, including
its regional offices and
attached agencies?
(possible scores are 0,
0.41 and 0.83)
GFPS members have
not yet served as
resource persons on
GAD within the
organization
Less than 50% of the
GFPS members
served as GAD
resource persons,
within the
organization,
including its regional
offices and attached
agencies
50% or more of the
GFPS members
served as GAD
resource persons
within the
organization,
including its regional
offices and attached
agencies
0.41 Please attach list and profile of the GFPS members including the
trainings conducted.
Name of
GFPS
member who
served as
GAD
Resource
Person
Title of
GAD
Activities
Conducte
d
Name of
Office/U
nit,
Regiona
l Office
and/or
Attache
d
Agency
Date
Conducte
d
Mina
Ejay
4.2. Does top
management direct the
monitoring of the
organization’s GAD
efforts? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41 and
0.83)
No initial discussion
among top
management officials
on the monitoring of
the organization’s
GAD efforts
With initial discussion
among top
management officials
on the monitoring of
the organization’s
GAD efforts
Top management
issued directive/s to
monitor the
organization’s GAD
efforts
0.41 Please attach copies of directive/s issued by the top management
regarding the monitoring of the organization’s GAD efforts as well as
monitoring reports, as applicable.
c/o Cecil –Chair TWg
4.3. Are concerned
staff members able to
calibrate GAD efforts to
address emerging
gender issues?
(possible scores are 0,
Concerned staff
members not able to
calibrate GAD efforts
to address emerging
gender issues
Concerned staff
members able to
identify emerging
gender issues but not
yet capable of
calibrating GAD
efforts to them
Concerned staff
members able to
calibrate GAD efforts
to address emerging
gender issues
0.41 Please list down GAD efforts calibrated to address emerging gender
issues
Title of
Calibrated
Emerging Gender
Issues Addressed
Unit/Concern
ed Staff

11. 11_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
0.41 and 0.83) GAD Effort/s Responsible
Scholarship Increased dropout rate
of student
4.4. Do top
management and
concerned staff
members reflect GAD
functions in their
performance contracts
or terms of reference
(TORs)? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41 and
0.83)
No reflection of GAD
in the performance
contracts or TORs of
top management and
concerned staff
members
GAD reflected in the
performance
contracts or TORs of
either top
management or
concerned staff
members
GAD reflected in the
performance
contracts or TORs of
both top management
or concerned staff
members
0 Please attach sample of Terms of Reference (TORs), Performance
Contract, Individual Performance Commitment and Review (IPCR)
forms of staff members and Career Executive Service Performance
Evaluation System (CESPES) of top management officials of the
organization
Planning to include in the SPMS and IPCR
4.5.Are concerned staff
members able to
develop tools and/or
knowledge products
(KPs) on
GAD?(possible scores
are 0, 0.41 and 0.83)
No tools and/or KPs
on GAD developed
Developed tools and
KPs on GAD with
assistance from
external GAD
experts/resource
persons
Developed tools and
KPs on GAD on their
own
0.83 Please provide details of tools and/or knowledge products (KPs) on
GAD developed.
GAD Tools
and/or KPs
developed
Purpose Name and
Designation of GAD
experts tapped for
assistance
brochure
newsletter
Jingle

12. 12_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
4.6. Are clients
(internal and external)
able to participate in 3
or more levels of the
development planning
cycle (planning,
management,
implementation,
monitoring and
evaluation) of the
organization’s GAD
efforts? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41 and
0.83)
No participation from
clients in all levels of
the development
planning cycle of the
organization’s GAD
efforts
Either internal and
external clients
participate in 1-2
levels of the
development
planning cycle of the
organization’s GAD
efforts
Both internal and
external clients
participate in 3 or
more levels of the
development
planning cycle of the
organization’s GAD
efforts
0.41 If yes, please describe the participation of internal and external clients in
the development planning cycle (planning management, implementation,
monitoring and evaluation) of the organization’s GAD efforts.
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
ID
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 4 People)
2.47
5. GAD Experts (max score: 5; for each item: 1.67)
5.1. Does top
management raise
GAD concerns during
high level meetings/
discussions? (e.g.
Cabinet cluster
meeting, international
conferences) (possible
scores are 0, 0.83 and
1.67)
Top management not
yet able to raise GAD
concerns during high
level meetings
Top management
are able to raise
GAD concerns
during high level
meetings
Top management
able to raise and
receive support on
GAD concerns from
colleagues during
high level meetings
0 Please attach documentation of meetings and/or discussions where
GAD concern/s was/were raised by the organization’s top management.
Meeting/Discu
ssion
GAD concerns
discussed/
raised
Name of Top
Management
who Raised
GAD Concern
Name of
Person who
supported the
GAD Concern

13. 13_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
Admin council mtg
5.2. Are the
organization’s staff
members recognized
as GAD experts by
other organizations?
(possible scores are 0,
0.83 and 1.67)
Staff members not yet
tapped by other
organizations
Staff members
recognized as GAD
experts and tapped
by 1-4 organizations
Staff members
recognized as GAD
experts and tapped
by 5 or more
organizations
0.83 Please attach list and profiles of internal GAD experts.
Kindly enumerate seminars/conferences/trainings facilitated by internal
GAD experts for other agencies and organizations
Name of
Internal GAD
Expert
Title of
GAD
Activities
Conducted
Name
of
Inviting
Organiz
ations
Date
Conducte
d
NFA Basic GAD
5.3. Are external clients
of the organization
recognized as GAD
champions by
reputable local,
national and
External clients not yet
recognized for their
gender mainstreaming
efforts
External clients
nominated,
shortlisted or cited in
their respective
localities on their
gender
mainstreaming
External clients
received awards for
their gender
mainstreaming efforts
from reputable local,
national and
international
0 Awards/Citations/Nomin
ations Received
Organization
Conferring the
Award/Citation
Date Conferred

14. 14_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
international
organizations?
(possible scores are 0,
0.83 and 1.67)
efforts organizations and
recognized in their
respective localities
Please also attach copies of news articles, other write-ups or
documentation (e.g. TV interviews) regarding recognized gender
mainstreaming efforts, if applicable.
*May not apply to agencies with no clear external clients (e.g. DND-Government
Arsenal)
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 5 People)
0.83
TOTAL GMEF SCORE
(People)

15. 15_PEOPLE
FOR GROUP 1
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
GUIDE FOR ANSWERING GMEF PEOPLE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Using the GMEF descriptor matrix or the “banig” as reference and the results of
the organizational assessment tool, mark the appropriate cell of the score sheet
where accomplishments of your agency are located.
2. Each item is marked with specific scores representing (1) YES; (2) PARTLY YES;
and (3) “NO”. Indicate a score in the appropriate column to signify the degree to
which your organization has complied with the GAD element. Under the
MOV/Remarks column, indicate/attach the means of verifications required or
provide explanation in support of your response.
3. Transfer the sub-total score per level to the GMEF Score Sheet. Add the scores
per level and indicate it in the shaded box to come up with the total score for the
People entry point.
4. To get the overall rating, add all the scores per entry point and indicate it in the
shaded box. Refer to the Legend of Scores for the corresponding equivalent
rating and stage.