The King Bill Of Rights (1689)

The King Bill Of Rights (1689)
King Bill of Rights (1689) has been submitted to parliament approves the legislative power of Parliament was approved. Soon belong to the people –
Puritan long–term revolutionary struggle between the absolutism of the king and the Constitutional Council began at the end to win the Constitutional
Council, the country's de facto sovereignty. This is the foundation of an independent constitutional monarchy of the United Kingdom based on the
harmony of human rights, the country was founded. This process is carried out without causing the spill, including Puritan Revolution; it is called the
Glorious Revolution. UK colonial exploitation and economic development was awoken by the industrial revolution, a political revolution is completed
earlier than any other country.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
James II was the starting points of a constitutional monarchy due to take longer claim to absolute rights of monarchs do not get the strength to break
with the British monarchy claiming the divine right of a king abdicated in 1689 as a result of the Bill of Rights. Began 500 years ago, the British
monarchy, with the king standing, powerful scepter will not function. They will not continue the absolute powers of the future British monarch to
parliament for the first time it was an opportunity consists of a compromise between the monarch and Parliament Glorious Revolution. The Glorious
Revolution through the enactment of the Bill of Rights will be able to prevent the monarch James II's abuse of its previous and power. In conclusion,
this era has been switched from absolute monarchy to parliamentary government in British
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Representative Democracy Research Paper
When it comes to the way the government is run in the United Kingdom, there has been great evolution from what it was when it started back in the
13th century as a monarchy. The progression of the government has changed drastically over 800 years to what's now used today: the Parliamentary
system (with a constitutional monarch on the side). The United Kingdom Parliament has served the 65 million people living in England, Scotland,
Wales and North Ireland for countless decades and continues to support and discuss relevant issues like health care, the environment, education, crime,
and national aid. In the four countries that dominate the United Kingdom, they work together to maintain what is one of the oldest governments in the
world, as well ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Starting in the year of 1215, when the rise of King John's new law system was put into place, he, with the help of his barons, made sure no one, not
even himself, was above the laws they created. In 1265, Simon de Montfort invited representatives of surrounding towns and shires to his Parliament.
These events helped found the representative democracy we now use today. What was once aconstitutional monarchy with a king and queen deciding
the rules of the land, is now a Parliamentary democracy where there's one leader and all the people get a say in the way it's run. The representative
democracy is more modern than how it was run in way back when. When the monarch ruled, a king and queen had power. This power was inherited
when a family member passes away and you're the one next in line for the crown. Laws and decisions were made by the legislation and passed by the
monarch before being granted. Although this way of government preserved culture and tradition as well as continuity, the monarch cannot be
removed no matter how poor their duties are and it also promotes class privilege ("this can push the idea that success can be achieved based only on
your social class instead of your hard

Should The Human Rights Act 1998
The Human Rights Act 1998 creates a solution for the breach of a Convention right in courts across the United Kingdom. It was granted Royal Assent
which came into play on 2 October 200, where its objective was through incorporate towards the United Kingdom law and the rights contained in the
European Convention on Human Rights. The United Kingdom's Prime Minister David Cameron stated "So at long last, with a Conservative
government after the next election, this country will have a new British Bill of Rights to be passed in our Parliament, rooted in our values." Also in his
speech the Prime Minister slated the European Court of Human Rights by saying "Rulings to stop us deporting suspected terrorists. The suggestion that
you've got to apply

Comparison of the British Parliament and the American...
Comparison of the British Parliament and the American Congress
NГ©meth Barbara
Szombathely
2005
Introduction
I write this essay with the aim of comparing the British Parliament with the American Congress. I personally think that everybody should know the
major differences between political system of the US and the UK.
First of all, I would like to describe my technical conception in my essay. I separated it in two columns and on the left side I write about the British
Parliament and on the other side about the American Congress. I tried to draw a parallel between the two systems and the columns, which are next to
each other, examine the two institutes from the same aspect. After each section I summarized what has been written. Of... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The British Parliament is often called the "Mother of Parliaments," as the legislative bodies of many nationsВ—most notably, those of the members of
the CommonwealthВ—are modeled on it. However, it is a misquotation of John Bright, who had actually remarked on 18 January 1865 that "England is
the Mother of Parliaments", in the context of supporting demands for expanded voting rights in a country which had pioneered Parliamentary
government. The Congress of the United States is the legislative branch of the federal government of the United States of America. It is established by
Article One of the Constitution of the United States, which also deliniates its structure and powers. Congress is a bicameral legislature, consisting of
the House of Representatives (the "Lower House") and the Senate (the "Upper House").
The House of Representatives consists of 435 members, each of whom is elected by a congressional district and serves a two–year term. Seats in the
House are divided between the states on the basis of population, but each state is entitled to at least one seat. In the Senate, on the other hand, each
state is represented by two members, regardless of population. As there are fifty states in the Union, the Senate consists of one hundred members. Each
Senator, who is elected by the whole state rather than by a district, serves a six–year term. Senatorial terms are staggered so that approximately
one–third of the terms

Treaty Of Union In 1707 Essay
Before the act of Union in 1707, the kingdoms of Scotland and England existed as two independent Unions. King James VI of Scotland succeeded
Queen Elizabeth I after her death and in doing so, also became King James I of England, thus creating the 'Union of the Crowns' in 1603. As a result,
the Union of the Crowns were now controlled by the House of Stuart and consequently ruled by the same monarch. In virtue of possessing the English
crown, he also ruled over the Kingdom of Ireland, yet each Kingdom maintained their own parliaments and laws.
However, this arrangement changed significantly in 1707, when the unions of Scotland and England were united. The agreement created by the
amalgamation of these kingdoms is known as the 'Treaty Of Union' 1707, the treaty consists of 25 articles. The act proclaimed that there would be 'one
United Kingdom, by the name of Great Britain', with a single united crown and a single united ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The response from the English Parliament to the Act of Security was the 'Alien Act' of 1705. The act contained provisions to treat Scottish Nationals
living in England as aliens, threatening trade, inheritance and a threat to weaken the Scottish economy. In the 1707 Act of Union, of the Treaty
provided the succession to of the House of Hanover and for Protestant succession. The laws of these acts, restricted the succession to legitimate
descendants of Princess Sophia, Electress of Hanover, a Protestant and Grand–daughter of James VI & I. Sophia of Hanover became heiress
presumptive to the crowns of the Kingdoms of England and Ireland before 1707 and unequivocally became heiress to the Kingdom of Great Britain
after the Act of Union in

Essay about United Kingdom
ondon is the capital of the United Kingdom. It ranks as one of the world?s most historic cities, tracing its roots back nearly 2000 years. London has
long been a great world port and trading center. The port of London consists of two huge docks and 43 miles of wharves along the Thames River.
London also has a remarkable transportation system. Expressways, and underground and surface railways carry more than one million commuters
between the outlying areas and central London each workday. More than 350,000 commuters travel by subway, about 400,000 take surface trains and
more than 100,000 go by bus. About 100,000 people drive their cars to work. The London subway system (the ?tube?), is the largest subway system in
the world. It includes... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The relations between these two countries were strengthened by the UK?s alliance with the United States during both World Wars, the Korean conflict
and the Persian Gulf War. TheUnited Kingdom and the United States regularly consult on foreign policy issues and global problems. The United
Kingdom is surrounded by the Atlantic Ocean, therefore its location is ideal for ship transportation. Shipping is an inexpensive and fairly efficient
method of transportation; however, the United Kingdom also has a large number of airports and railways (see transportation). The United Kingdom is
also located close to France and Belgium, which are two of its main trading partners, resulting in inexpensive transportation of goods.
he UK has an exceptionally well organized system of government. The United Kingdom is a constitutional monarchy. Queen Elizabeth II is the head of
state; however, a cabinet of senior politicians, known as ministers governs the country. The prime minister (Tony Blair, elected May 2,1997) is the head
of the government. Parliament is the chief lawmaking body. It consists of the monarch, the House of Lords and the House of Commons. he United
Kingdom is said to have an unwritten constitution as it is not all jotted down on one document. Some of it?s written parts are laws passed by
Parliament, others come from historic documents (Magna Carta), and common law. The unwritten part contains ideas and practices that British society
has developed

The Human Rights Act And The United Kingdom Of Great Britain
any scholars have argued that the introduction of the Human Rights Act has fostered a change in the constitutional order, and that parliamentary
sovereignty is no longer the main basis of the British Constitution. In order to assess whether the introduction of the Human Rights Act 1998 fostered a
change in the constitutional order and that parliamentary sovereignty is no longer the main basis of the British constitution it is first necessary to
understand the British constitution. This essay will analyse the term constitution and its principles, the effects the Humans Rights Act and the
European Communities Act had on the Uk Constitution and ultimately explain parliamentary sovereignty and why it is no longer the main basis of the
British... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The limitation of power exists so that exercise of power must conform to notions of respect for individuals and individual rights. Introducing the
rule of law, according to Dicey the rule of law has three meanings (a) the supremacy of regular law over arbitrary power (b) equality before the law
and (c) no higher law other than the rights of individuals as determined through the courts (Dicey, 1885). When the government is answerable to the
law, the court are empowered to make the authoritative determination of what the law is. Laws must be clear, for example in the case of the Burmal
Oil Co Ltd v Lord Advocate [1965] the House of Lords upheld the claim for compensation against the crown in respect of damage done by British
forces during wartime. It was seen as incompatible with the rule of law and caused the War Damage Act 1965. Control over the discretionary power is
essential. Since the British Constitution is un–codified and the rights and duties of citizens are not expressly codified in one central document. The
classical British view of rights is that individuals were free to do anything that was not prohibited, the Human Rights Act fostered a change in the
constitutional order, as it incorporated the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights 1951 [ECHR] into the domestic law of the United
Kingdom. The separation of powers is a model of government that many

The United States Vs. United Kingdom
The United States and the United Kingdom have both become industrialized democracies, however by saying that it may seem as though they have
many similarities which is true, but there are many more differences in the political systems they use and the way the states are governed. Just because
United States and the United Kingdom share these similarities and differences in their Presidential System, and the formation of their democracies, the
United States is viewed by far as a much weaker state due to their Presidential System, but this was all deliberate. In Comparative Politics Domestic
Responses to Global Challenges by Charles Hauss the development of the United States and the United Kingdom becoming democracies are very
different. In the late 1700's moving toward a democracy had been building for "two hundred years." The "New World" and the "individualism,
capitalism, Protestantism, and scientific revolution," was the new way of thinking. Thomas Hobbes was one of these thinkers. After his death came the
American Revolution. Around the same time, Adam Smith's book, The Wealth of Nations came out. People began to want political and economic
freedom and with this came laissez–faire capitalism, which means "allow to do." There was then two new ideas for democratic thought. "First the
state should be limited. Second, rather than telling people how to act in all areas of life, the state should serve as a referee that protects the society
from the arbitrary exercise of

Fotse
Abstract
Having fixed–term Parliaments in the United Kingdom is something that has been debated across the political spectrum for some years and, with the
enactment of the Fixed–Term Parliaments Act 2011, is no longer something which is merely debated, but a political and constitutional reality. The Act
came into force with little consultation, research, or advice to or by the Government; it was exceptionally hurried legislation. This means that there is
little written on the wider constitutional effects of the Act, and it is exactly that which this essay will try to examine.
To analyse the Act's significance I have looked at the position prior to the Act and what the Act changed, before moving on to examining and critically
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This can be done with a vote of a two–thirds majority in the House of Commons to call such an election.8 A general election can also be called early
if a vote of no confidence is passed on the Government, with a simple majority in the House of Commons. Fourteen days after such a declaration, if
there has not been a vote of confidence in the Government, then an early general election will take place.9
House of Commons Library, Election Timetables (Research Paper 09/44, 13 May 2009) Sir Alan Lascelles 'Dissolution ofParliament: Factors in the
Crown's Choice' The Times (London 2 May 1950) 5 6 Fixed–term Parliaments Act 2011, s 1(2) 7 Ibid, s 1(3) 8 Ibid, s 2(1)–(2) 9 Ibid, s 2(3)–(5)
5 4
3
Arguments in favour of fixed–term Parliaments being significant:
The first argument that these changes are constitutionally significant is simple; it is the codification of a royal prerogative, pragmatically wielded
solely by the Prime Minister, into a power for the legislature as a whole. It is a rebalancing of power within the British Constitution. When talking about
this power Leyland said 'the Royal Prerogative to dissolve Parliament on the advice of the Prime Minister was regarded as a core feature of the
constitution',10 from this then, we can surmise that the loss of this power is constitutionally significant.
It also represents something

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Devolution
ESSAY
The concept of devolution was first introduced in 1998 in the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom is made up of England, Scotland, Northern
Ireland and Wales. Devolution can be defined as the process whereby the central authority delegates part of her powers to the local or regional
authority to exercise on her behalf. In this case, the UK parliament, which is the central authority, transfers some of its powers to the local authorities
which are the Scottish parliament, the Northern Ireland parliament, the London Assembly and the National Assembly for Wales.
The origin of Devolution can be traced to Donald Campbell Dewar (21 August 1937 – 11 October 2000). He is generally referred to as the 'architect of
Devolution' as well as the 'advocate for Scottish devolution'. And as such, he was elected Scotland's first First minister in the 1999 election. As ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 2010, the Scotland Act Established Healthcare Improvement Scotland. This organisation was in charge of healthcare services at the independent
level. So far, they have incentivized the rapid development and reformation of health care services in Scotland. It works on the improvement of the
quality of the healthcare development based on the scrutiny and constructive criticisms of the Scots. This was achievable because devolution has given
Scotland a chance at experiencing better and more specialised services.
A stronger economy is only one of the many benefits of devolution to Scotland. Prior to devolution, Scotland has slowed down the United Kingdom
regarding business establishments and commercial activities in general. Now, one of the basic aims of the Scottish government is to encourage the
creation of more businesses, the continuous existence of these businesses when they are created. Competition among firms have increased competition,
efficiency and innovation, thereby, boosting the economy and achieving the aim of the Scottish

Scotland Act 1998 Essay
The Parliament of the United Kingdom and the Scottish Parliament are the main sources of law in Scotland. However, the Scotland Act 1998 and the
Human Rights Act 1998 are two pieces of legislation, produced by the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which have had a significant impact on the
development of the law in Scotland. They have made important changes to how law is made in Scotland and how the Scottish legal system works. This
essay aims to examine what it is these Acts are intended to do, and discuss the impact they have had on the development of law in Scotland.
Until the Acts of Union 1707, which formed the Parliament of Great Britain (the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801), Scotland had a separate
Parliament which was able ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some of these matters are; constitutional matters, defence and national security, the fiscal and monetary system, immigration, energy (including
electricity, coal, gas and nuclear energy), common markets, trade and industry (competition and consumer protection), and employment legislation. The
Act does not contain a similar list of devolved matters, but it is interpreted as meaning that the Scottish Parliament may legislate on any matter not
reserved to the UK Parliament, including health, education, the legal system, national heritage, housing, local government, the police and fire services,
environmental affairs, and economic development. The Scotland Act 1998 also provides that the Scottish Government can change the basic rate of
income tax. Previously, before the Scotland Act 1998, all taxation powers were the domain of the UK Parliament. Therefore, the Scottish Parliament
may legislate for any issue which is not a reserved matter, and as long as the legislation doesn't contravene the criteria set out by Section 29(2). This has
had an impact on the development of the law in Scotland as it means that the Scottish Parliament may create legislation, however it also means that the
Scottish Parliament may only make legislation for certain

European Community Law Enacted Into Domestic Law
The European Communities Act 1972 was passed by parliament, this introduced the European Community law enacted into domestic law. On the 1st
January 1973, the United Kingdom joined the European communities, along with other European nations, and this embarked on the nations becoming
the European Union. On the 23th June 2016, the European Union Referendum Act 2015 took place questioning as to whether the United Kingdom
should leave the European Union, and thus, the people voted in agreement to leave. This triggered Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union,
whereby Prime Minister Theresa May is to give liable notification to exit the European Union. This allows a two–year 'open window' to discuss a
withdrawal agreement. The R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union case discusses as to whether the Crown's notice is
substantial to give notice of this leave.
The legal issue presented before us asks if the Crown Court has the prerogative power to give notification under Article 50 to exit the European Union
without notifying parliament. This foreseeing the risk of losing European Union statutory rights. The Crown agrees so, and this brings into question
parliaments sovereignty, Britain's constitutional statutes and what can be perceived as a diminishing history of democracy.
The defendant Secretary of State pinpoints that in the ECA 1972, 2015 Referendum Act or any other United Kingdom legislation passed by parliament
states no terms which show that the

Cas Vromans Research Paper
The Houses of Parliament, Cas Vromans
The Palace of Westminster is the meeting spot of the House of Commons and the House of Lords, the two homes of the Parliament of the United
Kingdom. Generally known as the Houses of Parliament after its inhabitants, it is otherwise called the 'heart of British legislative issues'. The Palace
lies on the north bank of the River Thames in the City of Westminster, in focal London.
The principal illustrious castle was based on the site in the eleventh century, and Westminster was the main living place of the Kings of England until
flame decimated a great part of the complex in 1512. After that, it served as the home of the Parliament of England, which had been meeting there since
the thirteenth century, furthermore as the seat of the Royal Courts of Justice, situated in and around Westminster Hall. In 1834, a considerably more
noteworthy fire desolated the vigorously remade Houses of Parliament, and the main huge medieval structures to survive were Westminster Hall, the
Cloisters of St Stephen's, the Chapel of St Mary Undercroft, and the Jewel Tower.
Its name, which gets from the neighboring Westminster Abbey, may allude to both of two structures: the Old Palace, a medieval building complex
obliterated by flame in 1834, and its substitution, the New Palace that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Elizabeth Tower, specifically, which is regularly alluded to by the name of its fundamental ringer, Big Ben, is a famous point of interest of
London and the United Kingdom when all is said in done, a standout amongst the most prominent vacation destinations in the city, and an image of
parliamentary majority rule government. The Palace of Westminster has been a Grade I recorded working since 1970 and part of an UNESCO World
Heritage Site since

Parliamentary Sovereignty In The UK
During the buildup to the 2016 Brexit referendum those who campaigned to leave the European Union did so in order to take back control of their
nation, including taking back control of parliamentary sovereignty. Parliamentary sovereignty is one of the fundamental values of the United
Kingdom's constitutional law but European Union law, since the 1972 European Communities Act, trumps that sovereignty. This transpired due to the
United Kingdom becoming a member of the European Union where EU law takes primacy over national law. With being a member of the European
Union it entailed that the key law making body would be that of the European Commission rather than Westminster Parliament. Many European Union
regulations can bypass Parliament and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As human rights become more prevalent the courts could transition into the main law making body in regards to protecting those rights in common
law. Baroness Hale in Jackson v Her Majesty's A–G (2005) states, "The courts will treat... any attempt to subvert the rule of law by removing
governmental actions affecting the rights of the individual from all judicial scrutiny." By this Baroness Hale meant that even though Parliament has
sovereignty, the courts will intervene if legislation over steps its boundaries and affects human rights, as depicted in the Human Rights Act 1998. The
limitations to Parliamentary Sovereignty is not something new but instead has been witnessed throughout the formation of this modern society. For
example, in the North Atlantic Treaty 1949 article 5 states that members must come to the defense of fellow members, which suggests a forfeiture of
sovereignty over utilizing British forces. Also part of being a member of the World Trade Organization means that the United Kingdom is subject to
global regulation and arbitration of its goods and services, which is another trade off of sovereignty. The European Communities Act 1972 can be seen
as another type of exchange of sovereignty for the greater good of the country. During the 17th century Parliamentary Sovereignty was needed to create
order out of chaos but in the modern world

Pros And Cons Of The Parliament Of Great Britain
Scotland and England have a long–standing history with one another. They have always been in conflict with one another, especially when England
tried to take over Scotland. But eventually, England succeeded in their attempts and, in 1706, their acts of union were passed. They eventually took
effect in May 1, 1707. That day the Parliament of Great Britain was formed. The reason each side agreed on the Union was because both sides had
something to gain from it. The English did not want the Scottish to choose a monarch from the one sitting on the English throne. On the other hand, the
Scottish had a money problem from their attempt to colonize the Isthmus of Panama in the 1690s. But a large stretch of time has elapsed since that
Union. A vote was held inScotland on September 18, 2014 on whether or not Scotland should succeed from the United Kingdom. The Scottish had a
rather large to make. Both independence from and dependence on the United Kingdom have their advantages and disadvantages. If argued in the point
of view of Scotland, there are many pros for the whole kingdom. The first advantage is in the government. The Scottish Parliament is more democratic
than the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The reason this result came about was because of all the disadvantages there is to succeeding. The prime reason Scotland voted to not succeed was
because unity is strength. Being a part of a strong, rich, influential state such as the United Kingdom gives them a global presence. If independent,
Scotland's voice on the world stage would decrease tremendously. Another large reason is the United Kingdom will cut them off financially. Since
Scotland is a part of the UK, the country gives them money so they can sustain themselves. Without that connection, the UK has no reason to shell out
money to them. This is an economic gamble to Scotland, especially in times of recession and rising

Germany and the United Kingdom
Germany and the United Kingdom All countries in our world share many similarities and differences. This allows each country to learn from one
another's failures and successes. Two of the countries that have similar and different ways that they run their country is Germany and the United
Kingdom. These countries each have their own style of how they choose to run their countries. Both Germany and the United Kingdom are democracies
in the world, however they have many differences between the two. Germany has a constitution, simple branches of government, a complicated
electoral system, and interactive local government. On the other hand, the United Kingdom has no written constitution, a complex branches of
government, an intricate electoral ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The political institutions in the United Kingdom are very different of those in Germany. The United Kingdom does not have a written constitution (The
British Constitution). This means that unlike Germany and the United States, the United Kingdom does not have a tangible paper that has the basic laws
and rights written down on them for all citizens. "The constitution is generally understood to include a number of written documents and unwritten
rules that most British citizens view as inviolable" (O'Neil, Fields, Share). The United Kingdom bases their constitution on documents that have
developed in the past. Power lies with Parliament in the United Kingdom, so without a written constitution, the people of the state truly do not get
much of a say. Therefore, from a political institution standpoint, these two countries could not be any more different from one another.
Branches of government vary from country to country. In Germany, there is a chancellor, a president, the Bundestag, and the Bundestrat. The
chancellor is in charge of the whole executive branch, and the president is just the chief of state (The British Constitution). The chancellor is also the
prime minister and runs basically everything in the government, while the president tends to just do a few important things, but does not make
important decisions. Germany has a bicameral legislature which includes

Why We Select Thiis Country
WHY WE SELECT THIIS COUNTRY
For Ear Transo we have chosen UK as the destination country as UK is the country where the
population of immigrants is much larger than the other countries. The immigrants wants to be in
touch with their relatives in home country and they would prefer their own language or mother
tongue. By this product they can choose their preferred language. The difference between the
numbers of people is coming to live in the UK and those immigrating – rose to 182,000 in the year to
June up to 167,000. China now best the table for the quantity of new workers to the UK, took after by
India, Poland, the US and Australia.
TARGET MARKET
YOUNG GENERATION: Most of the young generation goes to UK for studies or for job, so they
want to be in their comfort zone with their loved ones in their home country.
JOURNALIST: Journalist can be the target market for this product as according to their profession
they are always in the conversation with different citizens have different languages. This product
allows them to choose the option for the language for which they want to go.

PEST ANALYSIS OFUNITED KINGDOM:
P0LITICAL:
The UK Parliament is the supreme legislative body in the UK and British overseas territories. The
parliament is a bicameral assembly, with an upper house, the House of Lords, and a lower
house, the House of Commons. At its head is the Sovereign, Queen Elizabeth II. The House of
Commons and the House of Lords are both

Arguments For Scottish Independence
On September 18th, 2014 the people of Scotland voted to stay within the United Kingdom by a 55.5% vote of the 84.6% turnout (Scotland's Future,
2013). Although a large turnout by voting standards, the marginal lead of the winning vote was slim. A main argument for Scottish independence was
to keep tax, economic, and social security decisions in the hands of the people whom it affected, the Scottish people themselves; rather than the
Westminster Government who determined those factors for the whole of the United Kingdom (Scotland's Future, 2014). If Scotland was to become
independent from the United Kingdom, it would be proposed that they would become a part of the European Union as its own country, a parliament of
Scottish people would make ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some voters did not understand where Parliament would get their funding, they had distrust in the First Minister's argument, and their own risk
assessment on whether it was worth it or not. The main consensus for their reason of voting No was that they were united together 300 years
previously and should stay united. There was also a lack of understanding in the reasons for independence. The demographics of the vote showed that
millennials of the sixteen to seventeen age range voted for the independence of Scotland, 71%. The voting in ages between eighteen and fifty–four was
almost a fifty–fifty split in the demographic ranges. However when it came to the age group of sixty–five and older, a large 73% voted No. Scottish
born residents weren't the only ones allowed to vote. Anyone who resided in Scotland over the age of sixteen was allowed to vote, which is where
approximately 400,000 votes from people of England, Wales, and Northern Ireland came from. The almost 800,000 Scottish people who lived in the
United Kingdom but not in Scotland however, did not get to vote on the issue of independence in 2014 (Black "Q&A" & Scottish Independence:

How Can There Be Limits To Parliamentary Sovereignty
One of the tenets of law has always been the ideal that Parliament is wholly sovereign, being the conclusive controlling factor on which the United
Kingdom constitution is based. Yet not all ideals are taken and translated into reality. The statement from Lord Hope in R (Jackson) v AG challenges the
sovereignty of Parliament, by demonstrating that there may be limits to Parliamentary sovereignty of which can be seen through the proceedings of the
R (Jackson) v AG case, Thoburn v Sunderland City Council, and HS2. Whilst conclusively determining that the rule of law is the ultimate controlling
fact on which the United Kingdom's constitution is based. Although counter–arguments can be taken from this statement and the appropriate cases, of
which ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although, the rule of law can be argued to be a judicial creation in reference to the following part of Lords Hope's quote "the rule of law enforced by
the courts is the ultimate controlling factor on which our constitution is based" and therefore allows for the judiciary to read the law, and statutorily
interpret it within the correct manner. However, the rule of law is enforced by the statutes of which are enacted and passed through the supremacy of
the legislative body, Parliament. Therefore, we can use the words of Lord Hope to determine that Parliament not only remains 'absolute', but
indefinitely withholds the right to enforce that its right to legislate amounts to it complete sovereignty, of which informs the rule of law, in which
informs the doctrine of the separation of

Difference between the US and UK Politial Systems
Possibly the most essential difference amid the United States and United Kingdom political systems is the constitution or the absence of one. The
United States has a written constitution as does a large majority of nation states. The British do not have a distinct article called the constitution but in
its place its constitutional necessities are scattered over numerous Acts of Parliament. TheUnited States Constitution is difficult to adjust and in present
political conditions, maybe impracticable to change in any significant respect. The Equal Rights Amendment which fought to provide equal rights for
women failed and there has been no victorious amendment of the US Constitution – except for one technical measure – since 1971. What for realistic
purposes constitutes the British Constitution –numerous Acts of Parliament can be altered by a simple majority in the legislature. For example, the
current Government presented set terms for the House of Commons by passing the needed legislation. In the United States, political dialogue regularly
makes references to the constitution, usually Republicans arguing that Democratic proposals are 'Unlawful'. Above and beyond the fact that the United
Kingdom does not obtain a constitution as such, it is uncommon for British politicians to dispute that the actions or proposals of their opponents are
unlawful. An essential characteristic of the American constitution is the firm separation of the power of the administrative, the legislature

What Is The Most Functional Form Of Government
There are many different forms of government and many different types of leaders. A constitutional monarchy is the most functional form of
government. This form of government is best because it has one distinct leader, a parliament that helps the monarch, and there is a balance of power
throughout the government. The king or queen is the leader of a constitutional monarchy. In this type of monarchy, the king or queen can do whatever
he or she pleases as long as it is within the boundaries of the constitution and parliament agrees with it. They usually get their position by family ties,
but they can also be elected. Once the leader in the position, they are in it for life and cannot be removed. In the United Kingdom and Japan, they
actually

Two Main Differences And Similarities Between Written And...
Let me start by defining constitution. A constitution is a set of fundamental rules, regulation and principles established to govern the affairs of a state
or an institution. There are two main types of constitution; the written (codified) constitution and the unwritten (uncodified) constitution. Firstly, let me
define what is meant by a written constitution. It is a formal document, stating the nature of the constitutional arrangement, the rules that govern the
political system and the rights of citizens and the government institute in a codified form. According to the dictionary meaning, "Codified form" is to
collect and arrange in a systematic form. That is, the constitution that governs the state is written in a one piece or ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This constitution usually comes into development by practice. Pek (2008) gives emphasis to the nature of the UK's constitution, that even though there
are some parts of the UK constitution that are codified, it is still not enough to classify it as a written constitution, since there has been no collective
comparing by the people . The unwritten constitution is characterized by parliamentary supremacy, royal prerogatives, unitary and monarchical
tendencies. In the United Kingdom, one would certainly argue that they have a constitution, but it is one that exists in an abstract sense, comprising a
host of diverse laws, practices and conventions that have evolved over a long period of time. Most people argue that the current constitutional
settlement in the United Kingdom reflect the principle of parliamentary supremacy. This means that Parliament can enforce any changes to the
constitution as it wants. Most people would argue that introducing a codified constitution would go against the principle of parliamentary supremacy.
The United Kingdom have all the characteristics of an unwritten constitution. That is no codified, flexible, not organized etc. Now coming back to it
having a written form. What would be the advantage? As the advantages of a written constitution have been seen above, it can also be applied in this
case. It would be rigid due to the

United States Government Vs. United Kingdom Government
United States Government vs. United Kingdom Government
People often vision the royal family, when thinking about the United Kingdom and think about how the King holds the power as the Head of State.
United States government seems completely due the President being in charge instead of a King, no one stops to think about the similarities the both
governments share. The United States and United Kingdom Government share similar aspects of their structure of government, power the heads of
government and contain the same political parties.
Representative Democracy, known as the established form of government in the United State in which citizens can elect representatives through voting.
The Representative's duties include to develop and create laws for the citizens to obey. The government's power divides into the following branches
Judicial branch, Executive branch and Legislative. The Judicial branch holds the power to argue "the meaning of laws and how they are applied" (The
White House). To prove, the branch completes the process known as the judicial review to determine if the laws violate the constitution. The President
holds the power in the Executive branch to carry out and enforce laws. The Legislative branch possesses the power to create laws. Unlike, the United
States government the established form of government in the United Kingdom is a Constitutional Monarchy, in which the Monarch "shares power with
a constitutionally organized government" (The Editors of

Comparison Of Democracy And The Republic
Both the pure democracy and the republic are centered around the ideal that the commoners have equal say in the decision making process, typically
this is done through a representative system (congress, senate, parliament, executives or others) to simplify the voting and decision making process.
Where they differ is in the fact that a Constitutional Republic provides protection to the rights of minorities from the will of the majority; in a true
democracy the majority rules over minority groups without limit. The citizens of the United States enjoy the protection of a strong constitution, made
even stronger by its first ten amendments: The Bill of Rights. Minority viewpoints in the United States are protected by the constitution and its
amendments, it is this constitution that prohibits the oppression of minority groups by majority groups.
In the work The Republic, by Plato, it is explained that the cities Crete and Sparta have a system of governance that is widely ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The government of the United States takes pride in its separation of power, keeping all branches of government at an equal plane. While there are
several forms of parliamentary governments, just as there are different flavors of democratic and republican governments, the key is that in a
parliament the head of state is typically a different person from the head of government (The United Kingdom, 2012). In many parliaments the head
of state is a monarch while the head of state is an elected official (The United Kingdom, 2012). The benefit of this system is that it takes the work of
running the country's internal affairs off the shoulders of typically the oligarch and places it on a body of elected representatives much like in the
United States. The head of state may retain powers or slip into a more symbolic role depending on the type of parliamentary system in

Main Causes Of The English Civil War
The English Civil War were multiple events of armed battles and political machinations between Parliamentarians(Roundheads) and
Royalists(Cavaliers) over the English government.
There were multiple battles in the English Civil war, also at different times. The war went on from August 22 1642 to September 3 1651. Some of
the main battles were Edgehill, Marston Moor, and the battle of Naseby.America was involved in this war and it is one of their only Civil Wars ever.
There were a lot of casualties in the war, and a lot of long battles fought.
The English Civil War was taken place in the Kingdom of England and was nine years long. Religion was a major cause of the Civil War, mostly
stemmed from problems between Charles I and the Parliament over an Irish insurrection. The war included the Parliament, the Aristocracy, the middle
classes, the commoners, and other armies. The Parliament was the highest legislature of the House of Lords, a commoner was an ordinary person, the
Aristocracy is the highest class in particular societies, and the middle class are people who are in between the working class and the upper class.
There were supporters of the King and supporters of the Parliament which was led by Oliver Cromwell, it just all depended on what they believed in.
The war also involved other kingdoms ruled by the Stuart Dynasty, Scotland and Ireland. This conflict left around 34,000 Parliamentarians and 50,000
Royalists dead, while more than 100,000 men and women died from

The Pros And Cons Of The Tory Party
Introduction The Conservative party is the centre right political part in the United Kingdom . It's also the biggest party in the government of the day
with 8296 counsellors involved , and a number of 303 members of parliament in the United Kingdom . The Tory party is the founder of the The
Conservative party in the year of 1834 . With that being in mind , the leader of TheConservative party today in the United Kingdom is David Cameroon
. His appearance in the United Kingdom brought acts like Welfare Reform Act of 2012 , the Educational Act of 2011 , and the Health And Social
Care Act of 2012 . The biggest issue or in another word , the most debated issue in the United Kingdom as for today is the repelling of the Human
Rights Act , an idea which has been brought on by the Tory government . This is mainly because the Tory government is in the opinion that the Human
Rights Act 1998 had allowed the judiciary to undermine the parliament which they plan to replace it with the British Bill of Rights . ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The council of Europe was established in 1949 intention to create fairness across Europe . In 1948 , the council accepted the United Nations of
Declarations of Human Rights . Thus , this will be a concept for a European charter and the European Convention on Human Rights came into force on
3 December 1953. Than , the United Kingdom accepted the right to individual petition in 1965 but the courts were not bound to apply this particular
convention as it was not incorporated into the law by statute . In the 1997 general elections , the Labour Party won by a big margin under Tony Blair
who fulfilled this pledge through parliamentary passage of the Human Rights Act . The human rights act 1998 came into effect on the 2 October 2000 .
Thus having said all this , should the Tory government whom are at force , repeal the Human Rights Act

The Rights Of Women In The Iranian Women's Rights
Iranian women are considered second class citizens and are legally bound to obey their husbands. They are forced to wear the Hijab and follow the
Islamic dress code. The Islamic dress code is enforced by the Morality Police, men who are volunteer members of the Baiji militia. If they are found to
be violating the dress code they are chastised, stoned, and beaten. Women inIran also have no choice in who they marry and the legal age of marriage
for women is thirteen while a man's is fifteen. Iranian men may have more than one wife and may divorce her at any time, giving them full custody of
their children. Iranian women also may not have a passport and they may not travel without written permission from their husbands. Only seventeen
percent of Iranian women are in the workforce, and they hold jobs in what is considered traditional women's jobs such a nursing, teaching, and
beauticians. The government of Iran has created laws and regulations that allow businesses to discriminate against Iranian women. These laws make it
impossible for women to hold any senior management jobs in the workforce. In 1936, Iranian Women were given the right to vote. The Iranian
revolution in 1979 turned the clock back for women's rights. In 1979 before the overthrow, twenty–two women were on the parliament and over three
hundred women were members of elected councils. After the revolution, all the women were forced out of working in the government. In 2013
President Hassan Rouhani

Devolution And The Scottish Parliament Essay
Within the United Kingdom, a recurring issue has been raised regarding the political position of Scotland and how the Scottish Parliament could better
govern the country. To establish whether the quality of life could be improved for the Scottish people, key events, devolution, and the Scottish
Parliament must be evaluated and analysed. The argument for greater power in decision making and the ability to implement change for the citizens of
Scotland, has been central to Scottish politics for some time.
The process of establishing devolution for Scotland began with the Scotland Act 1978, which made way for a referendum on devolution and
attempted to gain more power and legislature abilities for Scotland. The rise of the SNP forced the Labour Government of James Callaghan to
react. The terms of this Act stated 40% of the entire electorate had to vote "yes" for devolution and the establishment of a Scottish Assembly, this
included those who did not vote which were counted as a "no" vote. The 1979 Referendum, on 1st March, saw a majority of 52% in favour of
devolution, to 48% against. At first glance it appears Scotland was successful in its referendum, however only 32.9% of the electorate had joined the
majority, meaning the 40% required to achieve devolution was not met. With this failure to achieve devolution, the SNP backed a Tory motion of no
confidence in the Labour government which saw the 1979 election being called by just one vote. The 1979 election saw the rise of

The Doctrine Of Parliamentary Sovereignty Of The United...
The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty of the United Kingdom parliament is often presented as a unique legal arrangement without parallels in
comparative constitutional law. It has been one of the principles, which have stood in the heart of the Constitution and constitutional law in the UK.
After many years of enjoying the power provided to the Westminster Parliament, the major developments in the UK and European constitutional law
have caused many difficulties and challenges to it. For instance the European Communities Act 1972 and the Acts of Parliament 1911 and 1949. New
legislation has challenged the main competitions of the Parliament provided by the Parliamentary sovereignty and consequently have questioned the
adaptabilty of the traditional doctrine. In order to be able to understand, whether the traditional doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty can be still
regarded as an immutable part of the UK constitutional law, it is crucial to determine the criteria by which the immutableness will be judged. In the
constantly developing world, however, it is foreseeable that the traditional understanding of the Parliamentary sovereignty is no longer applicable and
as every legal rule it has to be constantly adjusting and changing in order to be immutable.
The idea of Parliamentary sovereignty has been developing in the United Kingdom since the 16th century, where the Parliament has decided to put
statutes over the church. Later, in 1707, the Earl of Shaftesbury wrote:

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Separation Of Powers
'Separation of powers, together with the rule of law and parliamentary sovereignty, runs like a thread throughout the constitution of the United
Kingdom.' The term "trias politica" or "separation of powers" was coined by Charles–Louis de Secondat, baron de La BrГЁde et de Montesquieu, an
18th century French social and political philosopher. His publication, Spirit of the Laws, is considered one of the great works in the history of political
theory and jurisprudence, and it inspired the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Constitution of the United States. Under his model, the political
authority of the state is divided into legislative, executive and judicial powers. He asserted that, to most effectively promote liberty, these three powers
must be separate and acting independently. This assignment discusses whether the doctrine ofseparation of powers is evident and desirable under the
United Kingdom constitution. It also seeks to analyze the rationale and impacts of the separation of powers. In addition, the assignment will examine
the advantages and disadvantages of separation of powers and how well it functions under the United ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of the main characteristics of the British constitution is that it has a parliamentary executive, as, by constitutional convention the executive is
drawn from the legislature. As ministers sit in the House of Commons, they are directly accountable to Parliament. However, s2 of the House of
Commons Disqualification Act 1975 limits the number of minister who can sit in the House of Commons. This clearly shows that ministers can
exercise both the role of Parliament and the executive. Moreover, parliamentary executive can also be seen in devolved institutions such as Scotland,
Wales and Northern Ireland. For example, in Scotland the Scottish executive is drawn from the Scottish

United States And The United Kingdom Essay
Two of the most powerful democracies in the modern era, the United States and the United Kingdom lead as examples as very successful forms of
democratic government. Yet despite both states utilizing democratic governments, both differ greatly on how they operate as a state and through its
governmental structure.
The Constitution:
The U.S created its current constitution after the failures of the Articles of Federation. It created a strong central government that derived its powers
from the constitution but also shared powers with state and local governments. The UK on the other hand, does not have a single document that stands
as its constitution but instead enacts constitutional provisions over several Acts of Parliament. U.S constitution is extremely difficult to ratify through
political means. This contrasts greatly to UK Acts of Parliament which can be changed by a simple majority in the legislature. The most important
aspect of the American constitution is the strict separation of powers of the executive, legislature, and the judiciary branches of government. This
separation of powers allows each branch to work independently but also allow them to check each other's powers if one branch oversteps their
boundaries. Checks and balances within the three branches serve to limit but also connect each to work together while being independent of each
other. In the UK however, no such formal separation of powers is present. The Government Minster must be a member of one of the

Separation Of Powers And The United Kingdom 's...
This essay is aimed to focus on and examine the importance of having a separation of powers and the reasons for having same in the United Kingdom's
constitution. We shall further look into the structure of the United Kingdom's constitution whilst assessing its somewhat unclear separation of powers
which exist and assess the reasons why the United Kingdom's system of government does not adhere to the doctrine of the separation of powers. The
separation of powers is defined as the political doctrine of constitutional law under which the branches of government are divided to prevent an abuse
of power. These three branches are the Legislative, Executive and Judicial and are assigned special powers to maintain a check and balance on each
other. In this essay, we shall further go on to discuss the roles and functions of each of the mentioned branches of government and the extent to which
this defined separation of power is enforced and/or practiced in the United Kingdom's system of government taking into account the traditional structure
that has been maintained over the years.
Aristotle states, "There are three elements in each constitution ...first, the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second the
officials; and third, the judicial element." These three elements as defined by Aristotle are now known as our Legislative, Executive and Judicial arms
of the United Kingdom's system of government.
Montesquieu believes, "everything would come to an end

Can The Traditional Doctrine Of Parliamentary Sovereignty?
Can the traditional doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty; be considered as no longer an immutable part of UK constitutional law. Has this notion been
limited after The European Communities Act 1972 was enshrined in United Kingdom law or when the Human Rights Act was incorporated into United
Kingdom domestic law in 1998. This will be elaborated on, after considering the theories of parliamentary sovereignty. Origin of the UK Constitution
and Parliamentary Sovereignty The United Kingdom constitution derives from Magna Carta, which was issued by King John of England to eradicate
political crisis in 1215. Since then, everyone was subjected to law, including the king himself. Albeit, Magna Carta has been partially modified over
the last ten years and majority clauses have been repealed, Magna Carta still remains a vital part of the United Kingdom constitution, British Library
(2014).
Parliamentary Sovereignty originated from the changing bought to the Coronation Act 1688 during the English Revolution. Once, the Bill of Rights
1689 were passed some rights of the parliament were protected therefore, it was agreed by the crown and the parliament that the nation was kept safe
from the ''tyranny of its king'', this lead to the manifestation of parliamentary sovereignty. In order to expand the English parliament, the parliament
wanted Scotland to join. However, Scotland opposed to the notion of parliamentary sovereignty, therefore, retaliated by presenting the Act of Security
1704

The Doctrine Of Parliamentary Sovereignty
For the sake of clarification, the term 'parliamentary supremacy ' should be defined and elaborated upon before discussing how the doctrine of
Parliamentary Sovereignty could be said to be out of place in the modern United Kingdom.
The Doctrine Of Parliamentary Sovereignty Explained
The 'basic principle ' of the English constitution can be summed up simply: A statute, that is, a piece of legislation produced and passed by the
Parliament, is generally regarded as the highest form of law within the constitutional structure. The Parliament is said to be a sovereign law–maker.
This concept is derived from a legal theory articulated by an Oxford law professor from the nineteenth century, A.V Dicey in the book, 'An Introduction
To The Study Of The Law Of Constitution '.
The doctrine of parliamentary supremacy can be summarised in three points:
The Parliament can make laws concerning anything.
No Parliament can bind a future Parliament (it cannot pass a law that cannot be reversed by a future Parliament)
For the sake of clarification, the term 'parliamentary supremacy ' should be defined and elaborated upon before discussing how the doctrine of
Parliamentary Sovereignty could be said to be out of place in the modern United Kingdom.
The Doctrine Of Parliamentary Sovereignty Explained
The 'basic principle ' of the English constitution can be summed up simply: A statute, that is, a piece of legislation produced and passed by the
Parliament, is generally regarded as the highest

Should Scotland Be An Independent Country
For decades the political relationship between the sovereign nation of England and the slightly independent country of Scotland has caused much
discourse for some Scot citizens. For almost 300 years the decisions that directly affected Scotland were decided from the Parliament at Westminster
Palace in London. This was not changed until rather recently when Scotland voted on its own Parliament held in the capital of Edinburgh. But for
some political parties and special interest groups this act of recourse is not enough and they called for a national vote to answer the question "should
Scotland be an independent country?" The deciding referendum that was voted upon on September 18 of this year was the climax of the political
buildup between ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An analysis of the three most recent Scottish referendums from the years 1979, 1997, and 2014 show that the political atmosphere has become
increasingly more receptive to Scottish independence and shifting ideologies regarding nationalism are shaping global democracies.
Geographically England and Scotland both share land on the small island northeast of continental Europe, but the two countries did not share a
government until 1707 when the legislation titled The Union Treaty unified the nation. The death of Queen Elizabeth I in 1603 ended the Tudor line
of dynasty for the Kingdom of England resulting in James VI of Scotland (a Stuart) to become King of England. His throne became known as the
Union of the Crowns because never before had both England and Scotland been ruled by the same monarch. For almost a hundred years the two
countries were ruled in this manner until King William's death when the throne was passed to his sister–in–law Queen Anne who called for an
integration of unions. Neil Oliver, historian and author of the BBC's History of Scotland argues that Queen Anne's crown appointees that drafted the
original version of the Union Treaty that was sent before Scottish Parliament was "nothing more or less than a suicide note awaiting a signature."
Essentially it was doing just that, Scottish Parliament

Parliamentary Sovereignty : The Constitution Of The United...
Parliamentary sovereignty is the principle in the constitution of the United Kingdom. The Queen use to be the main legislative authority in the past.
She was able to pass down any law, this was known as the Queen in Parliament.
Royal Prerogatives is a form of historical powers, which is used by the Monarch, but in its exercised by the government ministers. Dicey described the
royal prerogative, as the remaining portion of authority of the Crown . Personal prerogative is exercised by the monarch not by ministers. Ministers use
executive prerogatives, under the name of the Crown. There are four personal powers the Monarch has, dissolution of parliament, the appointment of
Prime Ministers, granting royal assent to legislations, and also dismissal of the government. However, Blackstone believed that, since the United
Kingdom become part of the European Union, that parliamentary sovereignty has been limited.
In addition, legal authority can pass, adopt and repeal any law. Courts cannot overrule its legislation, the reason being is that Parliament can pass laws,
the next future parliaments cannot change. Common law was established as judicial rule in the late 17th century in the United Kingdom, in 1608
which was the 'Glorious Revolution .In 1689 the Bill of Rights, was passed and sovereignty was removed from the King, and was replaced with
sovereignty of the King in the parliament . The Act was to ensure that the Monarch must gain the assent, in order to place legislation and

Introduction. How Alike Are Great Britain And Franceв
Ђ™S
Introduction
How alike are Great Britain and France's political systems to one another? The British system has had a lot of gradual steady changes throughout the
years. While, the French political model has had more dramatic radical changes, until about 1958. In 1958 Charles de Gaulle changed the constitution
and set the precedent for the modern semi–presidential system that we see today. In this paper, I will be comparing both systems to one another and
point out their huge similarities.
Great Britain
The United Kingdom has a Westminster Model which is a democratic constitutional monarchy. The United Kingdom has a constitution that is unwritten
that consists of having conventions along with statutory law and common law, which make up the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A vote of no confidence can be called if any government–sponsored bill is defeated in the Commons. If the vote of no confidence is passed, the Prime
Minister must either resign, or ask the monarch to dissolve parliament, and call a general election. Basically, since a government usually holds a
majority in the Commons, and party 'whips' try to ensure that party members support the government, governments are likely to win all but the most
controversial votes. However, if a government doesn't have a large majority, then it can bring "backbench" members of parliament into line, and call
three–line whips; votes that are compulsory for members of parliaments to attend.
PARLIAMENT TheParliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the supreme legislative institution in the United
Kingdom and British Overseas Territories (it alone has parliamentary sovereignty). It consists of a head of state (currently Queen Elizabeth II), a
bicameral system with an upper house; House of Lords and the lower house which is the House of Commons. It also includes an Upper House,
called the House of Lords, and a Lower House, called the House of Commons. The House of Lords is an almost a fully appointed body. The House of
Commons, on the other hand, is a democratically elected chamber. The House of Lords and the House of Commons meet in separate chambers in the
Palace of Westminster (the Houses of Parliament), in central London. The

Describe And Explain The Roles And Responsibilities Of...
This report will outline, describe and explain the roles and responsibilities of different levels of Government.
1.Roles and responsibilities of the Monarchy: (P1 & M1)
The current Monarch is Queen Elizabeth 11, She is the longest reining Monarch of 63 years. The Monarch is the Head of State and Head of the
Common Wealth. The main role of the Queen is to pass legislations, which have to go through a process, called royal assent. The royal assent is
processed once a legislation/bill has been completed through all of the parliamentary stages in both House of Commons and House of Lords; the royal
assent means that the Queen formally agrees to make the legislation/bill into an act of Parliament. The Queen has to have weekly meetings with the
Prime minister in which she has the right and duty to discus and express her views on all the current Government matters. The communications
between the Queen and Prime Minister are to be remained strictly confidential and once the Queen has expressed her views, she will abides by the
advice of her ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The House of Lords is currently made up of 790 Members who are eligible to take part in the work of the House of Lords, the Members of the House
of Lords are appointed by the Queen given by the advice of the Prime Minister, however some of the non–party–political members are recommended
by an independent body which the House of Lords appoints commission. The House of Lords shares the task with House of Commons of making
and shaping new laws and then checking and challenging the work of the Government. The Members of the House of Lords spend more than half of
their time in the House considering draft laws, whilst the draft is going through both stages of each House, the House of Lords examines each bill
before it can become an Act of Parliament (law). The House of Lords also has 2 members of the

Importance Of Parliamentary Sovereignty
To answer the question as to whether parliamentary sovereignty promotes good government and strong democratic and constitutional values, this essay
shall firstly define what is meant by the term parliamentary sovereignty. Secondly, it will analyse what good government and democracy is said to be
in society today and if that corresponds to the role of parliamentary sovereignty in the United Kingdom. This essay will also significantly look at
namely the rule of law and the separation of powers within the United Kingdom and if it in some way it generates democracy. Finally with reference to
various sources of law, the essay will describe the level as to which parliamentary sovereignty has changed and shaped actions in the United Kingdom's
government in response to the Miller Case.
Parliamentary sovereignty or parliamentary supremacy is a notion in constitutional law. Dicey depicted parliamentary sovereignty as 'the right to
make or unmake any law whatever; and further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set
aside the legislation of Parliament.' Three aspects are present in this definition of parliamentary sovereignty; the first is that Parliament can make or
unmake any laws. The second principle is that Parliament cannot be bound by its predecessors nor does it have the legal right to bind its successors.
An example of this is the case of Ellen Streets Estates Ltd. v Minister for Health [1934] in which the courts held

The King Bill Of Rights (1689)

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jessica Oatis

More from Jessica Oatis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The King Bill Of Rights (1689)