First Presidential Debates

First Presidential Debates
The participants of the first presidential debate are; Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. The debate was 90 minutes long, and divided into 6 segments
of 15 minutes each one. The three main topics of the debate were; Achieving prosperity, American's direction, and Securing America.
Achieving prosperity:
Hillary Clinton stated:
To build an economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top.
To raise the national minimum wage and also guarantee, finally, equal pay for women's work.
To have the wealthy pay their fair share and close the corporate loopholes.
To have a tax system that rewards work and not just financial transactions.
Donald Trump stated:
People are using the U.S as a piggy bank to rebuild their economies.
Stop our ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition to provide the best information to viewers and listeners to help them take a decision based on the candidate's best goals for the country.
Every candidate has different proposals for the success of the country, and people have to judge on each of the candidate's proposals.
In my opinion, the debate and the questions were well structured; however, both of the candidates did not focusing on answering the questions
correctly, more than half of the debate was spend on accusing each other about past things, and blaming each other for bad decisions in their past.
Instead they should be focusing in explaining their goals for the country.
I believe that the first debate did not accomplish its goals. The public was more confused after listening to each other. Both of them have strong
personalities with good and bad things about them. I believe that the candidates should focus more on their leadership's skills, and speeches with strong
objectives that shows why they are the best candidate to be the future president of the United
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Debate Over Presidential Debates
What topics are labeled important enough to be talked about during presidential debates? Topics such as terrorism and national security; the economy;
jobs and employment; and the Affordable Care Act and Healthcare all managed to be the center of attention during all debates. What topics were
almost entirely ignored? Topics such as gun policy; social issues like LGBT rights and abortion; and the environment andclimate change were put to
the side to instead talk about Hillary Clinton's email scandal or the sexual assault charges brought up against Donald Trump. While terrorism and
national security; the economy; jobs and employment; and the Affordable Care Act and Healthcare are all very important topics, but one topic that was
ignored and should have been at the forefront of the debate was climate change.
Issues like renewable energy, hydraulic fracking, anthropogenic greenhouse gases, and the Paris Agreement should have been hot topics during the
three presidential debates. So why were they not? Both the Democrats and Republicans seemed to be more concerned with trying to make the
opposing candidate look as bad as possible. However, climate change is not something that should be labeled as a Democratic or Republican problem,
instead all political groups should be worried about this topic. Climate change can affect food production, water availability, wildlife and human health.
Also, weather conditions such as storms, tornadoes, and earthquakes can damage roads, railroads,

Presidential Debate Essay
Presidential Debate
Al Gore and Governor George W. Bush are running for the Presidency. The two candidates are in Presidential Debate to allow the voters to get an
understanding of where they each stand on certain positions and policies. Bush and Gore have some similarities and differences on certain positions
and policies discussed in the Presidential Debates. Education is an issue discussed in the Presidential Debate. Bush and Gore both agree that there is
nothing more precious than educating a child. The two Presidential Candidates support the issue of spending $170 billion over 10 years for children in
public schools to achieve high standards. They each want to rebuild outdated buildings, modernize schools, and wiring ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, Gore supports the current child tax credit of $500, but Bush supports doubling the child tax credit to $1,000. Bush pledges to veto any
income tax increase. Also, their proposals for the non–Social Security surplus differs. Bush proposes to use the non–Social Security surplus in the
following manner: $1.3 trillion tax cut; $475 billion in spending on domestic programs; and $265 billion in reserve. He would eliminate the national
debt by 2016. Gore proposes to use the $2.17 non–Social Security surplus in the following manner: $480 billion in targeted tax cuts; $360 billion to
shore up the Medicare program; $870 billion in spending on domestic programs; and $300 billion would be left in reserve. His proposal would
eliminate the national debt by 2012. Another policy that Bush and Gore agree mostly on is Health Care. The two Presidential Candidates both support
the children's health insurance program (CHIP).
Bush and Gore agree on allowing low–income parents to buy into CHIP. They each support the issue of using part of the federal budget surplus to
offer a voluntary prescription drug benefit for Medicare beneficiaries. Bush and Gore also support the Patients' Bill of Rights legislation that includes
the direct access to specialists; the right to use the nearest emergency room; choice of providers; and a patient's right to appeal a health

Psychology In Presidential Debates
This article sets out to examine the influence of psychology used by presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump during the TV
presidential debates. Persaud and Bruggen state that public perception influences votes, and that perception can be altered by strategies built on an
understanding of psychology. It references a recent study in "Electoral Studies" by Peter Schrott and David Lanoue called, 'The power and limitations
of televised presidential debates: Assessing the real impact of candidate performance on public opinion and vote choice.' This study went into depth on
twenty–six historical examples of behaviors by candidates in TV presidential debates influencing public perception, and subsequent wins or losses.
The study concludes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is of course because of the many different aspects of a candidacy that lead to a successful election, but perhaps the article could have gone more
in depth as to, say, the relationship between voter perception of candidates and candidates' eventual success or failure, or between voter perception of
candidates and their willingness to go out and vote. This is perhaps because of other influences on the activeness of voters, and more so because the
article seeks only to examine "success" of a presidential debate. This also raises the question of what the authors define as a success–whether it's the
definition given earlier in the study from Schrott and Lanoue or if it whether it leads to winning the election, it's not stated. The influence of language
and biases on voter perception of the debates is made clear,

First Presidential Controversy: The Second Presidential...
The second presidential debate was held at St. Louis, Missouri on a Sunday Evening, October 9th, 2016 at 9:00PM. The debate lasted until 10:30PM.
The debate involved presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Just like the First Presidential Debate, this debate mainly focused on
the candidates and their plans for the future. That night, there was a lot of opposition in opinion on both sides. It was a heated battle. Both Trump and
Clinton battled it out with facts, some of which were both very strong and very weak. In the beginning of the debate, both Trump and Clinton had a
fierce attitude. The candidates had brought up many past events. They debated against each other`s plans to create a better country. One of the main

Third Presidential Debate Analysis
I watched the third presidential debate on Wednesday, October 19, at 8 pm. Chris Wallace moderated the debate between the Democratic nominee
Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump. The purpose of the debate was to allow for both candidates to be compared side by side in
order to determine who would be a better candidate to become the president of the United States.
In general, the debate was not unlike any other presidential debate. The candidates did their best to avoid answering questions that made them look bad
by responding with an answer to a different question. When given a chance to respond, the opponent would present their own argument, which always
sounded like a rebuttal but never really addressed their opponent. Throughout

Vice Presidential Debate Essay
The Vice Presidential Debate took place at Longwood University located in Farmville, Virginia moderated by, Elaine Quijano. Senator Tim Kaine and
Governor Mike Pence both sat at a table with Quijano. The debate consisted of 9 segments, each 10 minutes in length and 2 minutes for each
candidate to respond. Topics discussed in this debate include questions about Donald Trump's temperament, the economy, Social Security, police and
race relations, nuclear weapons, abortion and religious faith. It was very surprising to see a young moderator, Elaine Quijano. She was the first digital
network anchor selected to be a moderator. She did a good job at being a moderator, not to mention having to be the first Asian American moderator.
When the debate was firing up with interruptions, she stepped in and said "Gentlemen, the people at home cannot understand either one of you when
you talk over each other." She was well paced, had asked essential, substantive questions.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The vice presidential debate was full of interruptions that was getting clearly annoying. I don't think undecided voters will take a side due to the
amount of silliness going

Essay On Presidential Debates
It's evident that this has been one of the most divided and controversial presidential elections starting from the primaries all the way to the first and
second presidential debates. Whether we agree with the candidate's political views and methods of approaching the American people, and regardless
of our personal opinion on the matter, it seems like both candidates have created an interest on this particular political event in the American people,
this is best described in the iconic words of Isoroku Yamamotto "They have awakened a sleeping giant". Whether it is for their popularity and
controversy in the media, as it has been shown in the recent debates, they have helped shine a spotlight on the political process and with it, they've
brought to the light an interesting group of voters, they've continued and some cases started a conversation on social and foreign issues, but more
interestingly, in some way, they've shown how the American people thinks.
Donald Trump comes to the political game as an outsider who has seen how everything works from the common man perspective. Many ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of the things that Hillary is criticized the most, as it was pointed out by Trump in the recent debates, is her inconsistency on issues such as trade,
foreign policy and even her perception on the Obama administration. Many individuals belief that this inconsistency could be reflected in her policy
making process. Another way in which Hillary influences the political process would be by promoting policy that is directly linked to the interests of
her many supporters as Trump pointed out in the second debate. In the other hand her experiences in foreign countries, and her experience in the
senate brings with her the ability to make realistic proposals and educated policies to solve the issues that our society faces

The Presidential Debates
The main goal of this article was to discover if the televised presidential debates increased the amount of knowledge of campaign issues amongst
uneducated voters. One of the downfalls of this campaign overall, was that it seemed too artificial and staged to some of the voters. It was during
this election, that many print media providers were called out for simply focusing on the "horse race" as opposed to the political issues at hand. In
hope to contradict this claim, evidence was "found that more than 75 network TV stories mentioned each of the 'big four' economic issues of
1988–taxes, trade, unemployment, and the state of the economy." (Drew & Weaver, 1991, pg. 28) The presidential Debates were also seen as evidence
to contradict this claim

History Of Presidential Debates
Potty jokes, making fun of someone's looks, calling each other losers. It's not a kindergarten playground, it is the potential leaders of the free world,
taking part in the highly publicized US presidential debates. Once upon a time presidential debates were a platform that candidates would use to
educate and inform constituents on the issues they want to solve and the policies they want to make reality. Formerly a television event that many
Americans would watch in order to determine who they would cast their vote for come November 8th presidential debates have evolved into a comedy
event. If you look at the current candidates on the roster you see an insulting extremist, a robotic and cold politician, and a blustering socialist.
Struggling

Presidential Primary Debates Analysis
As people age, the world grows differently in their minds. Each is prompted to think differently about themselves, others, or the world after an
experience which made them see differently.This year, the world has been a witness to a unique and astonishing presidential primary debates.
Watching the presidential primary debates has changed my perspective on the world and people as a whole. It has been thrilling and baffling to see
people take their candidate's side with such a strong passion. It seems that the country is split into two sides. Both crowds have the contradicting
mindsets and values. With each side having different opinions and reasons, it is hard not to see the differences and learn a thing or two from them.
There are many types... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I assumed that the people would be more unified share a greater passion for electing a perfect candidate together. Instead, some people want to
rebuild America and make it great by getting rid of public services, aid provided to the people, and individuals who help the nation. Some of the
reasonings behind the people's mindset are irregular. While some mindsets have a more appealing reason to why they stand for the values that are
brought by their chosen candidate, there are others who have irregular or confusing reasonings. I can understand why some may vote or support their
preferred candidate, but there are some people who I can't quite grasp their perspective on the situation. To understand the situation better, I had to open
my mind. Changing the way I saw the world and people's thoughts, helped me have a better understanding of people's reasons. I was able to
understand that some people have angry and fear, therefore they want to change. People hope to see the future as a better place. The people don't want
the world to stay the same. I thought of the situation has made me think differently about people and the world. The future of the world will

Pros And Cons Of The Presidential Debate
Extra Credit: Presidential Debate The first presidential debate was held in Hempstead, New York on Monday of September 26. The two presidential
candidates that clashed that night was Republican nominee Donald J. Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. This night was meant to gain
an advantage on your opponent in the polls. The debate focused on three main points of discussion; America's Direction, Achieving Prosperity, and
Securing America. When asked about the topic regarding America's Direction, the subject about jobs was really acknowledged. Trump brought up
how China is building almost all of our things and that jobs are leaving the US for cheap labor. He as well promised to bring back 25 million jobs
back. Hillary was for making

Presidential Debate
Jackson
Dr.Dubose
Debate Speech
By far, the United states presidential debate is one of the most popular debates in America. The debates are extremely important for the citizens of the
United states because they help those in the audience as well as those watching from their homes decide who will be the country's next president for
the next four years of office. Not only does the debate reveal how the presidential candidates will solve their issues for the country, if elected, but they
also create a long lasting connection and relationship between citizens and the candidate. The citizens of the United States either tune in on television or
arrive at the debates location to witness the most anticipated debates that takes place every four ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Donald Trumps and Hillary Clintons first impression in all of the debates were unfriendly because in the beginning of each debate both Hillary and
Donald never shook hands with each other. The appearance of Donald trump was not candid either. Donald Trump showed to all debates in his usual
business attire, black and white suit with a red tie. That appearance gave a 'it isn't personal, it's just business' impression to the audience. Hillary,
however, dressed formally like she was normal united states office personnel. All in all, both Trump and Hillary put on a great and entertaining debate
for the 2016 presidential

Presidential Debate Pros And Cons
Presidential debates have been a very influential part of presidencies throughout history. They give voters an idea of what kind of leaders the
candidates are and how they respond to stressful situations. There have been many different kinds of presidential debates since they began to be an
important aspect of campaigning. After the parties have chosen their candidates, the debates will take place at a set time. In every election, it has
been a debate between the two main candidates, usually one from each of the most popular parties. They discuss and debate controversial topics back
and forth based on questions by certain people, or sometimes members of the audiences. Presidential debates have evolved in any ways, and have
never been seen as... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The idea was started when Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas held a senatorial debate in 1858. There was no panel or moderator, and it just
consisted of the two candidates arguing the pros and cons of slavery. This debate is one of the main reasons campaigns consist of extremely
popular presidential debates. After the debate between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas, there would not be a debate for 15 election years.
The speeches and campaigning done by the candidates was done separately, and was not publicized nearly as much as it would be in later years
with the advantages of technology. 1948 was a very important year for debates because of the very first radio broadcast. This event brought 40 to
80 million listeners closer to the debates than they had ever been. Years later in 1960, the first televised debate between Nixon and Kennedy created
a whole new campaign. After this occasion occurred, the presidential debates were expected to be a part of every election. They were extremely
popular and a very important part of the campaigning. During Nixon's time as president, he overrode a bill that repealed the Communications Act of
1934 that included Equal Time Provision. The bill required candidates to have equal time with the media. Candidates would take advantage of this, and
refuse to debate in order to keep votes away from their opponent. A refusal to debate was much better than giving the competitor the upper hand. In
1988, the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) became the only organization to be able to host debates (Friedman, 2012). Unofficial debates can
be held by news agencies and television networks, but do not determine anything concrete. These events throughout history made presidential debates
what they are

Democratic Presidential Debate
The race for the White House is a long and tedious process that is mobbed by campaigns events and stump speeches, but more importantly candidates
are givens the opportunity to contrast their ideas with other candidates in televised debates. On January 17, 2016, I tuned into the Democratic
Presidential Debate that was hosted by NBC News in Charleston, SC and moderated by Lester Holt. This debate included all three Presidential
contenders: Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Martin O'Malley. All candidates made reference to Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in their opening
statements because of the King holiday being the following day. Each candidate tried their best to make an appeal to continuing the work of Dr. King
by ensuring justice... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The use of twitter by both the viewers and the candidates are geared toward one particular goal: to try to change the mind of voters. By candidates
operating on Twitter they possess the ability to make instant rebuttals to something that another candidate has said without having to release an
official statement or waiting until the next debate. Also in an age of social media candidates and their campaigns believe that it is one of the most
effective ways to broadcast information and connect with voters. Twitter users also use this median as a way to make fun at a candidate's position or
simply try to convince others to change the way they have chosen to vote. Many twitter users from the Republican party took to the social media
website to bash the democratic candidates and their policy positions. One user slammed a comment made by Governor Martin O'Malley that the
greatest threat facing the United States was climate change. This made for a twitter field day with other users implying that the democratic candidates
do not take the threat of terrorism and ISIS seriously which disqualifies them from the presidency. These type of instances can have negative effects
for either party because of how quickly a retweet can make a statement viral and could end up severely hurting a campaign. However, this reaction did
not alter my impression of the candidates or the debate at

The Evolution Of The Presidential Debates
The presidential debates have changed throughout the years. From my perspective debates do matter because the candidates debate to get chosen to
change the United States into a better place. Appearance shouldn't matter but what you say and how you act should. If there were no debate there
might wouldnt be a president nor voter.
The candidates debate to change the United States.This year's debaters
(Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton) are more concerned and after each other than the US. Both candidate Hillary and Trump can be great presidents if
only they would stop trying to make the US into their own world. What the two candidates say could affect them winning the election so they should
think before the speak. Debaters should speak from

Vice Presidential Debates
Olesya Tipikina
October, 9th, 2016
Vice Presidential Debate
I was not able to watch the debate the day it took place, however I did watch the entire debate online a few days after. It has been extremely difficult
for me to watch this debate as well as the presidential debates focusing solely on their speaking styles, without paying much attention to the content that
they are speaking about. It was also difficult to understand both candidates in some places, for they continuously talked over one another! Kain seemed
to have more thought out answers. At one point Pence even asked, " Did you work on that one a long time? Cause that had a lot of really creative lines
in it." They both used lots of personal examples throughout the debate. For

Essay on Presidential Debates
Presidential Debates
Making a decision is a very important part of life that every person, at one time or another, has to make. Options are always available when someone
has to make a decision. In choosing a President for our country, we have to look at our candidates and decide which ones beliefs can help the country
the most. We get to hear the President's opinions through the debates. This year, although we had numerous candidates, the only two that were allowed
to participate in the debates was Vice PresidentAl Gore and Texas Governor George Bush.
The first debate was held at the University of Massachusetts in Boston. There was no clear and obvious winner in this debate. The debate featured a
lot of bickering by both candidates ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They did not see anything wrong with what Bill Clinton has done in the past eight years so they start denouncing him for the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
The Texas Governor also believed that Gore had had his chance for the past eight years but had not done anything he had promised. One of the most
important issues for the candidates and the voters is the way the way they control foreign policy. When asked if they would use force to remove
Slobodan Milosevic, both said they would not, but Bush said that he would ask Russia to mediate in the talks. This led Gore to point out that Russia
has a tendency to support Milosevic at times.
A poll was taken after a debate asking people whom they thought had won the debate. Forty–two percent of the people believed that Gore had won,
while thirty–nine percent believed it was Bush. Nineteen percent believed it was a tie.
While the second debate at Wake Forest University was the least exciting and was gone over very politely by both candidates, the third debate at
Washington University in St. Louis featured the most arguing between the two. Bush tried to illustrate himself as a leader who would reach across
party lines and bring the nation together. Bush also believed that, although, both of them could talk and make promises, he could actually get it done.
On the other hand, Gore tried to portray Bush as someone who would lend a helping hand to big, corporate companies. After feeling the pressure from

Argumentative Essay: The First Presidential Debate
I sat down on my couch on the crisp night of September, 26th, it was very much like the calm before the storm. My dad and I awaited for the first
Presidential debate to begin. We flipped through channels to decipher which channel to view the debate on, and were eventually redirected to Fox
News. Genuine American man Donald Trump entered the stage, meanwhile as did Hillary Clinton, with that trademarked fake smile of hers. I
witnessed them awkwardly meet in the middle of the stage, which I believe everyone in America could agree was just extremely cringeworthy. During
this greeting, my Dad uttered to me "Wow, I hate that women" as I replied "I know, Trump is about to roast her". The debate started, both candidates
explained policies, and seemed ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Eventually my interest began to diminish, as my Dad and I decided to flip on the World Cup of Hockey game. This is when I came to the realization
that politics are really stupid, and I shouldn't have cared this much to begin with. The United States isn't working with much, in this upcoming
election. Each candidate probably won't have much success, and both are just absolutely lying about so many issues just gain votes. During this time
of realization, as I continued to watch this hockey game, Politics should be more like Hockey, I imagined Trump and Hillary dropping the gloves on
the ice and possibly this could resolve some issues. Sure they both have to sit 5 minutes in the sin bin, but I would say that would be a lot better than
whatever they did on that stage that night. My view about this election changed immensely, I came to the conclusion that politics are overrated and
very devious. America needs change, none of the candidates seem to be the best option, but come November 8th, I will most likely still be voting for
Donald Trump, just not with the same enthusiasm as I had

The Role Of Television In Presidential Debates
The rise of popularity in presidential television debates leads one to the question of it having a positive and or negative impact on candidates
campaigns. Television allowed people to see the debate in a new perspective, visually, however it idolizes and highlights candidates to make them
seem as if they are celebrities, instead of focusing on their intellect and topics to improve the nation. Therefore one can see the impacts of television as
negative, for the media is downplaying the actual value of presidential campaigns and focusing on less important irrelevant entertaining topics.
Television is taking the serious main focus of presidential debates and devaluing it to minimize the whole picture as well as focus on unnecessary
entertaining matters, for a presidential debate actions such as this are disdainful. Instead of focusing on candidate's of intellect the media highlights
candidates of more appealing entertaining traits. The media encourages to "aim for the lowest common denominator"(source f) for if they were to
"tackle the difficult subjects (source f) ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Candidates should not be allowed "victory" based on entertainment quality for how are they to lead a nation, when they lack the trait of intellect.
Others counter argue that television has given audience a new experience, the chance to feel connected to candidates on a personal level. In the late
1940's it was believed that television was to be a "new era... in public communication" (source a). It was said "Not even the sky is the limit." (source
a) for "Television... provides a new, direct, and sensitive link between Washington and the people" (source a). The media might not show the whole
picture and might also favor entertainment it was still seen as a step forward in public communication for television did allow audience to connect with
candidates, for now they could see the candidates

Presidential Debate Over Presidential Debates
With the 2016 election in full throttle, Kennedy and Nixon's presidential debates of 1960 are still very much a part of American democracy.
Televised presidential debates have become a backbone in an American election. Although these debates are now considered a norm in American
politics, this has not always the case. Even after the first time a presidential debate was held between presidential candidates from across the aisle, it
took another 16 years for another debate to occur. It is highly doubtful that either Nixon or Kennedy, much less anyone else of that time period,
would have been able to foresee the effects of their debate. The presidential debates between Kennedy and Nixon have shape American politics for
what seemed like the better but as more and more research is published, this claim is starting to fall apart. While presidential debates offer the public a
chance to compare and contrast the Republican and Democratic presidential candidate, they have an impact on viewers that is not always positive.
Rather, televised presidential debates impact voters across the aisle and throughout levels of political awareness. An in–depth look at the history of
televised presidential debates and their impact on viewers could answer the question of whether televised presidential debates should remain a central
part of the modern American democracy.
Background
The Great Debates
John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon met in Chicago on September 26th, 1960 to make history as the first

First Presidential Debate Analysis
On September 26, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump encountered each other in the first presidential debate. The debate is now considered as the
most–watched debate in the U.S. history with an average audience of 84 million, and held at Hofstra University in New York. Clinton and Trump's
comments were of big controversy as they were bringing each other's secrets to the light, some of the issues that they tackled were gender, taxes, and
national security, inviting the people to vote for one of them this November. Trump claimed that Clinton prepared herself for the debate. While she
admitted it, she also said she was prepared to be president. Trump would defend his opinions and plans on lowering the taxes on the wealthy while
Clinton would defend herself because of the leaked emails. Clinton did a lot of publicity during the debate on why people should not trust Trump. One
of the most controversial comments of the night was when Clinton stated that Trump would verbally abuse women, making an example out of ex–Miss
Universe Alicia Machado. Trump criticized deals made or approved by Clinton's husband Bill, stating that she was not helping to improve people's
lives. Clinton admitted fear of Trump handling nuclear codes as he is "so erratic." On October 10th, both found each other again in the second... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Meanwhile, Clinton praised the system saying it has helped many people and the health care's rates have gone up. Trump stated that Clinton was using
a picture that would imply that President Barack Obama was not born in the U.S. during her campaign in 2008 and now they are supporting each
other. Clinton claimed that Russia was the one responsible for her email hacks while Trump attacked her as "a liar" and if he becomes president, he
will take care of the

The Second Presidential Debate Analysis
While using a variety of different appeals, "The Second Presidential Debate" argues that integrity is the most important quality of a president, and this
argument is shown throughout the debate through both the candidate's choice to undermine each other's character. Though it seems as if both
candidates use illogical arguments to persuade the audience, in all reality they use many logical fallacies and appeals to help make their argument
better, and their opponent's seem weaker. At the beginning of the presidential debate the opening question for the candidates is, "Do you think that you
are proper role models for today's youth?". Both Hillary and Trump use similar strategies and veer from the question at hand by switching to a totally
different... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because both presidential hopefuls use the same strategy over and over, does it continue to still be affective on the audience. Well, looking at the way
that both Hillary and Trump had made many arguments based on their opinion of the audience, it goes to show that they don't hold the audience in the
highest respect; yet the audience would still voice their opinions on their candidate through their applause. Knowing that the American people like to
be entertained it is shown through both Hillary and Trumps actions that they would make somewhat illogical arguments to try and keep the audience on
their side. This strategy actually worked too. Obviously the somewhat "silly" arguments that were made actually made implications on the audience to
convince them to support a certain successor. To conclude, "The Second Presidential Debate" clearly shows that the next president should have
integrity. This claim is shown throughout the period of the debate by the arguments that both Hillary and Trump make, and the implications that their
arguments make on the audience

The Debate On The Circus Acts That Were Called The 1st...
After viewing the circus acts that were called the 1st presidential debate and the vice–presidential debate that aired earlier in the month, my
expectations for the 2nd debate were not too high. Unfortunately my even my low expectations were not met and I felt as though there was not a large
enough improvement during this debate to have made any difference from the first one. While we saw some improvement in terms of candidate
behavior, the rest of the debate was severely lacking in substance. Questions posed by the audience were shallow, then made even more so by the
follow up questions from the moderators. On the topic of moderators, there appears to be a continuing theme of their lack of effectiveness that has
carried throughout all of the debates including this one. Leading up to the 2nd debate we have seen the results of having two candidates with political
views on complete opposite poles and personalities to match. The events of the first debate can easily be described as throwing water into a pot of hot
oil and just watching it happen. Throughout the debate we had seen Donald Trump repeatedly interrupt and attempt to interject as Hillary Clinton was
speaking in an effort to defend himself. However this interruptions were more of a nuisance, especially due to most of them being composed of the
words 'no' and 'not true'. Fortunately for the sake of everyone watching the debate, Trump learned to better control his interruptions and was largely
silent while it was

Republican Presidential Debate Essay
The debate I am choosing to watch is the Republican Presidential Debate, and my focus would be on examining Donald Trump's portions. The
debate of course, is about Republican candidates who are running for president (intended for the next four years) debating to the public on who is a
better choice to vote for. In the broad sense, Republicans takes on conservative stand on issues. They believe the federal government shouldn't play a
big role in the citizen's lives. Most Republican wants lower taxes in addition to less government spending on social programs such as healthcare, food
Stamps and education. The portions that I am looking at would be the part where Trump talks about building a border wall and also where he speak of
immigration. It... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During his whole presentation, Trump have shown countless hand gestures while he is speaking. His hand gestures seem to go with the rhymes of
his listings or when he say things that seem to be important slowly. For example, one of the time would be him yellowing out "a fifty billion dollar,"
when talking about how the US would lose a large sum of money if a trade imbalance were to happen. His hand gesture here moves up and down,
making a point that the amount is large and important. In addition to his hand movements, Trump's head also turn several times, and his blinking seems
to be constant every seconds and endless at times. When he talks about how he is self–funding his blinks seem constant, however when he talks about
the Mexican leaders, his blinks seem endless. This shows that Trump might be sarcastic or lying when he say he respects the Mexican leaders. When
people say something that they do not believe is true, their actions begin to put more effort into "being normal" resulting in irregularity of too much
effort. Other than blinking endlessly at times, there are also times when Trump stops blinking. One of the times when Trump stop blinking is after he
finish talking about Mark Zuckerberg (founder of Facebook) and his support on H1B. This demonstrations that Trump may be able to control his
blinking during his sessions since his eyes did not flicker. It gives the feels that he might be trying to distract himself or his audience from his

Presidential Debate Analysis
A consensus stemming from the media is that Secretary Clinton was definitely the winner of the debate, but the race for the presidency is hardly over.
Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post writes, "At times she came across as overly rehearsed and robotic... She was, unsurprisingly, very well prepared
– using a slew of facts and figures to not only make her positive case but also to slam Trump." Clinton had clearly done her homework and was
prepared with witty comebacks to Trump's usual feisty remarks, as well as, clear plans for our country which she masterfully weaved together to make
the most of her two–minute responses. He, on the other hand, did his best to bring up topics he is comfortable talking about like the 33,000 emails
deleted off... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to Independent Journal Review's Director of Viral Media, Kyle Becker, Lester Holt seemed to be absent from a large majority of the debate
leaving the candidates to pettily bicker and waste valuable debate time. He did, however, decide to be a fact–checking moderator 50 minutes into the
debate. Holt did not let Trump get away with not "specifically" answering his questions and with answering his questions with statements that were not
true. He fact checked Donald Trump 4 times but while letting Hillary Clinton say whatever she liked without interruption." While this statement makes
Holt appear to look bias and unfair, Mrs. Clinton was 'fact checked' throughout the debate and was deemed 100% truthful during Monday evening's
debate which leaves little room for corrections and interruptions. Megan Garber, a staff writer for The Atlantic, says, "To do well, Holt would need to
ask good questions...to find a happy middle between fact–checking the candidates in real time and letting them... talk–to the public, and to each other.
[Not] interrupting the debaters, challenging their assertions, [or] 'Lauering'... were elements of the delicate balance Holt needed to strike... He did a
great job." Finding a perfect balance between fact–checking and allowing the candidates to do the fact–checking, being impartial, and asking good
questions is impossible because the media all want to see different things and you can't expect the man to please everyone. To conclude, I did not see
an overall consensus about Holt's performance, because journalists either applauded him or harshly criticized

Presidential Debate Essay
Presidential Debate Another four years another presidential debate. Before I go on to the current debates let me state a few facts about past ones. The
Lincoln and Douglas debate was in important because it started Lincoln presidential career. The Debates lasted from August 21–– October 15. There
where seven of them, with two days to two weeks in between. Each debate lasted three hours; first candidate spoke for one hour; the second for one
and a half hours; the first replying for a half hour. Candidates alternated going first. The topics involved where primarily slavery and the Union. Other
important debates were the '48 and '57. They were the only debates before 1960; there were no presidential debates between 1960 and 1976. In... Show
"It's a school of strong discipline a high standards. It's one of the best schools in Houston." "That's my vision for public education all around
America."(Governor Bush) Bush also wants to change Head Start to a reading program and also he wants people to access reading money if they
want to. Bush wants more kids to learn how to read and have more teach–for–the–children type teachers. Bush only cares for the children. Gore on the
other hand agrees with only a couple of things that Bush stated. He strongly supports accountability; he also supports local control. Bush and Gore
agree on both. Gore thinks every teacher should be tested including in the subjects that they teach. He also thinks that 100,000 new teachers
should be recruited to reduce class size. The main reason for that is because a man gave him a letter from his daughter. The girl is the 36th student
in her class; the picture attached showed that there was no room for one desk so she had to stand. He also wants to make college tax deductible
(up to $10,000 a year). I believe that both of the candidates have very good points on education, they were to combine there ideas they would come up
with a very good education plan. I like college being tax deductible and I also like the 100,000 more teachers for to reduce class size.

1. The presidential campaign of 2016 is one that is highly debated, historical, and one that created quite an interesting debate. Watching it in a lecture
hall with people who I didn't know with views that were unknown to me consistently reminded me of class in ways of debate structure. Just like our
class, both sides were constantly doing a back and forth, but not incorporating a dialogue, each side would deliver a speech within time limitations,
involve some rebuttal and then continue onto the next subject. The points of information weren't really seen as points of information, but instead often
perceived as interruptions. In most cases it was Donald Trump speaking over Hillary Clinton, but there were instances of both. When Trump did it,...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I did find the constant change of subjects quite interesting because they ranged from economics to climate change to race to even broad questions like
will you accept the outcome of the election. They weren't focused on just one topic, it was widely ranged which was very different than our class
debate set–up, but at the same time they were at times, both able to answer the question they were asked, rebuttal a little, and then move on to the next
question. 2. I most likely would've watched the debate regardless, but watching the debate in an in–person audience altered my perspective in a way
that wouldn't have happened if I was sitting on my couch with friends. First off, I went to the viewing alone so instead of sitting and chattering
throughout the debate. I was in sense more focused on the diction the candidates where using which led to me focusing on certain rhetorical devices
we have previously discussed in class. One of the devices that were so apparent to me was the device of ethos, this debate was constantly using situated
ethos and the post–humanist take on ethos throughout. The

Presidential Debates
Television and the purpose of it has changed in a negative way throughout the years. At the beginning, we took advantage of being able to be a part of
the presidential elections and acquire the facts about what truly mattered during the debates. Lately we've started to look at what the screen is showing
us rather than concentrating on what it was actually telling us. We as people have begun to want to appoint our official leaders based on who looks
better and television has helped feed this desire for the worst. Technology has been changing progressively from the start. Everything about it ranging
from the speed, the design, the size has been replaced with a modernized and immaculate version. Computers, phones, and televisions all started ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The first way they make this possible is to groom and primp their image. Theodore White "thought that Kennedy benefited because his image on
television was "crisp"; Nixon's–– light–colored suit, wrong makeup, bad posture–– was "fuzzed (Source C)." He is saying that Kennedy acknowledged
the fact that his appearance made a big difference in how the people looked at him and he made sure that he was up to par with his looks. Another
way they make their appearance look better in comparison is to draw attention away from themselves and attack their opponent's character. This
technique is referred to as ad hominem and it is one of the most common ones used in this year's presidential debates. A prime example of this is when
Donald Trump once said, "Unstable Hillary Clinton, lacks the judgment, temperament and moral character to lead this country –– and I believe that so
strongly," he then later continued with, "She's really pretty close to unhinged, and you've seen, you've seen it a couple times. The people in the
background know it, the people who know her know it and she's like an unbalanced person." In this claim he has completely left the topic of what
truly matters and has started to stray away from it in an attempt to make Hillary seem inferior. All of this is a battle of image over image. Louis
Menand wrote, "Our national politics has become a competition for images or between images, rather than between ideals (Source C)." This statement
just backs up the idea that we've started to focus on looks rather than

Essay On Presidential Debate
1st Presidential Debate Paper
In this first presidential debate the speaker I chose to focus on presidential candidate Senator Hilary Clinton. This speech was given at Hofstra
University, which is located in Hempstead, New York. This debate was held on Monday, September 26th, 2016 to a large audience. The audience
included many politicians, everyday Americans, neutralized individuals etc... In the opening segment of this debate, Mr. Lester Holt opened up this
event asking each presidential candidate how would they respond to the issue of jobs in the entire United States if they were elected. In her response
she was very focused and determine to get her point across. She was trying to persuade the audience that she would make the more valued ... Show
She was answering towards another subject that was unrelated to the question that was provide, yet she quickly recovered. She then began to get to
the real topic of the job issues in the United States. She capitalized on the unemployment rate, gap between rich and poor, poverty, education and just
the economy in general. Since it was a debate she had to wait her turn before being able to answer because her opponents was speaking. A moderator
was available there to keep the presidential candidates on track, fore the ending of the speech came together as a whole. She utilize some repetition to
emphasize key points in multiple parts of her speech.When using repetition in a speech, the speaker should emphasize the points with a tone that is
different from the rest of the speech to catch the audience's attention. Repetition in speeches can also help to create a dramatic punch or closing to the
speech. The speaker can repeat a summary of information that was presented at the beginning once again at the end of the speech to clarify the main
points so the audience is aware of the theme or overall lesson. She wants to help "rebuild all communities throughout the world". Rebuilding
communities throughout the world could result in

The Presidential Debate On The American System Of...
A constructive national debate is something that is quite important to the functioning of the American system of democracy. A simple definition of
democracy offered by the Merriam–Webster dictionary is that democracy is "a form of government in which people choose leaders by voting"
(Merriam–Webster). Now, at a time of heightened awareness from many American people, the political debates in this country don't seem to be
providing them with good cogent arguments. Instead they are filled with fallacies and many falsehoods. In this essay I argue that the presidential
debate system is currently not living up to its potential, and I will focus specifically on Republican primary debate that took place at the Reagan
Library in Simi Valley, California. In doing so, I will argue that the main flaws in this cycle's presidential primary debates were the amount of fallacies
used, as structure used as well as provide some counter–arguments to my claims. In order to have a government that is run by people; specifically,
people that must choose a candidate to vote for, its seems fit that it would be important that there be adequate means of illustrating each candidate's
positions on all of the issues that the constituents care about. Presidential debates are the means of showcasing a candidates' policies to the nation and
at the same time they allow the citizens in the democratic society to make a more informed decision about their vote than they otherwise would have
without a debate.

Republican Presidential Debate Analysis
The Republican Presidential Debate was, as always, an intriguing experience for its viewers. America has found itself in the odd position of having
nine presidential candidates from the Republican Party. Leaving politics (mostly) aside, it became clear that most of these candidates rely on inspiring
and capitalizing on the fears of their voters. This conclusion is drawn from the fact that these candidates are poor seemingly poor communicators. They
are unfocused and unoriginal with their platforms. The only defining characteristics are their various levels of confidence, poise, and their body
movements. As previously mentioned, the candidates lacked focus. A common theme at the debate was their indirect responses. When asked a
question, the candidates would engage in a monologue criticizing the Democratic Party (popular targets were Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama). The
candidates frequently went over their allotted response time without offering a substantive response to questions asked of them. Marco Rubio was
especially guilty of this, as evidenced by moderators chiding him for being off topic. When asked of the country's financial situation, Rubio, Bush, and
Cruz fervently agreed that Clinton should be banned from the White House and the military needed to be rebuilt. However, there was never ... Show
There was a somewhat organized flow for these rants. The candidates started with how horrible the Democrats were, especially Barack Obama and
Hillary Clinton. They then progressed to how the military needed to be rebuilt and which one loved the military more. Then they reached personal
attacks. While very little of this had anything to with the questions directed towards them, it did show that the party is united on some topics, despite
their unoriginality in finding common

1960 Presidential Debate
Discuss the political impact of television and the new "social media".
Political impact of television, In 1960 Presidential Debate between Republican Vice President Richard Nixon and Democratic Senator John F.
Kennedy was the first to be televised. "Television gave elected officials and candidates for office and unprecedented way to speak directly to millions,
face–to–face". The increasingly negative tone of ads and political commentary has driven many to abandon interest in politics. Television lets the
viewers see what is going on in a political race, debate, and the polls as it is happening, and the viewers will make their minds up by what they see and
hear. This is more expensive for the candidates, because they have to pay for air–time. The TV networks usually let you see what they want you to see,
during a broadcast, especially when they cut to a commercial often. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"An emerging market and communications network for nonprofits, small businesses, and political campaigns". Since most Americans have a
cellphone and access to a computers these days. This makes it easier for candidates to get free advertisement out to the viewers, without them paying
big money out for a spot, and the viewers either like something or they don't then they will pass it along or tell someone to look at something and it
will get passed along and more viewers will share it, so the word will get out faster.
"5 ways New Media are Changing Politics":
1. News you can choose – People are selective viewers now, "they approach their news consumption the way they approach their iPod". Viewers can
choose the Internet, Facebook, Messaging, Twitter, Snap–Chat, You Tube, TiVo, Cable TV, and the best one is word of mouth of where they saw
something.
2. Share this – "Sharing is emerging as a way of distributing the news", as with Tweeters, Facebook, iPhone apps, and by text

First Presidential Debate Summary
Lester Holt's View of the First Presidential Debate This first presidential debate was chaos! The two candidates were just screaming over one
another, and I couldn't hear myself think! The night started out normal, or as normal as a debate is supposed to be. The two candidates seemed
composed for a small period of time while acting like actual adults running for president. Unfortunately, when the first question about the economy
was asked, Former Secretary Clinton decided to take a jab at Mr. Trump using a quote he had said about a potential real estate market crash in 2006.
She quoted that Mr. Trump hoped for the market to crash so he could potentially buy it. To respond, Mr. Trump interrupted her and countered, "That's
called business, by the way." This remark... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Unfortunately, my facts did not impact him in any way and he replied that I was wrong. This made me furious because I was the one who actually
decided to do research on a controversial topic instead of opening my mouth and blurting out random gibberish. To continue, I had asked Trump of
his reputation for questioning President Obama's U.S. citizenship and his opinions on the topic. Even though he was supposed to be prepared to
be asked this question, since it was a popular topic, he still flubbed in his thoughts by blaming the controversy itself and an aide of Clinton. Finally,
he foolishly decided to depict himself as a seeker of the truth rather than a racist. Clinton decided to respond with a series of facts depicting how
racist Trump really is. For example, she recalled the event of 1973 of when Trump was sued by the Justice Department for the act of discrimination,
depicting his life as one submerged in racism. She concluded her observations by borrowing a quote from First Lady Obama, "When they go low, we
go high." To conclude, the highly anticipated first presidential felt less like an official debate and more like two children fighting, and I

Debate or Debacle? by Fatima Navarro, Freshmen staff writer
The debate this august 6, 2015 was held in Cleveland Ohio, the first debate for the presidential campaign. Many of the comments made were
ridiculously childish. The following topics were discussed at the debate taxes, immigration, education, Obama's decisions, war, Isis, woman rights, and
gay marriage. Not many answers were proposed rather there were lots of snarky comments. Donald Trump has such a massive ego while he picked on
his opponents; then later claimed that he will get the Latino vote. Rubio wants the economy to support free market economics and has proposed tax
cuts. These tax cuts are for small businesses with great ideas. Rubio proposed to reform the US immigration system ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He does not agree with the Obama Care plan for he thinks it affects middle class families in not a good way. Ben Carson is the director of Pediatric
Neurosurgery and is the first doctor to separate twins that were conjoined. He is very much known for his views on social and political issues. Mike
Huckabee has once tried to run as president but failed so this is his second time running. In the debate he was asked about his view on gay marriage
and of course being an ordained minister brought up god and in general he didn't have anything against them just that they respect the church. In fact
he added that we recently attended a gay marriage of a friend of his. Scott Walker went to Marquette University but did not graduate. Even though
he was seen by many as a potential candidate and then chosen to run for president, I think homosexuals would despise him for he is trying to ban
gay marriage. Jeb Bush is following his father's footsteps, after being elected governor twice in Florida he decided to run for president. He wants to
reduce global warming by cutting carbon emissions and has stressed the role of private industry in addressing the problem. Bush believes that the plan
No Child Left

Presidential Debates Essay
Looking at the viewer rating of presidential debates in the election seasons can prove just how much people are interested in these debates. Voters
have good reason to do so because debating can show many qualities of a person. These qualities become very important when it comes to
presidential candidates because debates can show one's thoughts about policies, the ability to carry them out, and ability to settle negotiations.
Debating about policies shows whether one has made a judgment based on thorough thinking and deep knowledge. Being a 'good debater' usually
means that the argumentation one gives is sound and contains an analysis of the topic from various perspectives. Since the candidate needs to know
what he or she is talking about, they will have gone through long sessions of assessing the problem and building a stance on what they have
evaluated. The fact that debating requires critical thinking skills can be verified in a research paper that says, quote, "From a professional standpoint,
the debating process encourages an individual to consider multiple viewpoints and arrive at a judgement." A candidate who is good at debating about a
policy... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When a president meets the president of another nation, exchanging hellos and socializing is not the main objective. Naturally, the role of a president
is to assert the stance that a nation holds and bring the conversation to advantageous terms. During the US's presidential election, numerous articles
were published about how horrible a debater Donald Trump was. The consequences are clearly showing with reports of Trump's first negotiation with
the president of Mexico being a 'humiliation'. Through this example, it becomes clear that presidential candidates who are effective debaters will be
able to make favorable conventions because they are expert at turning the table at their

Presidential Debate Summary
The event that I would like to analyze is a First Democratic Presidential Debate 2016 by CNN that was held on 10–13–2015 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
This was the first occasion where all candidates from the Democratic party were together on the same stage. They were asked question about their
promises made to electorate and their future plants if they will get elected, but were also asked about their past decisions. The main idea of this
conference was for the audience to get more familiar with candidate and their views, and their past achievements or downfalls. For the candidates it
was a perfect occasion to get their message across to the audience, convince them to vote for their candidacy; they would also try to debate with one
another on issues... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Jim Webb (Former U.S. Senator from Virginia) keep him self very tight. Being a soldier in the past, you could seС
ѓ his control over his words and
emotions. His face did not portray anything and only the tone of his voice could give the audience an idea about his emotional connection to the
topic. Martin O'Malley tried to control himself, but his anger and disagreement was coming out through his body language. When he heard
something with what he strongly disagreed, you would see his face getting tense, his eyes glancing from side to side and shaking hand. He found it
hard to wait for his turn and it seemed that he wanted to fight the rest of the candidates for statements with which he did not agree. Hillary Clinton
looked very familiar with what was happening on stage. She was not put of by the harsh question and always kept energetic and positive answering
any question. She radiated her energy into the audience, and got audiences appreciation for that. She was standing still during the debate, her facial
emotions where the ones portraying everything she wanted to say or display to the audience. During this debate one of the most interesting things that
I mentioned was the way how the candidates played for the audience. When one of the candidates would say a statement for which the crowd would
applause, other candidates would try and straightaway compliment their opponent and add own views to the same issue. The fight for the audience
was too noticeable and it and it seemed that the candidates are willing to sacrifice their own principles for the joyful voices of the

Presidential Election : Presidential Debates
In order to determine the best candidate to be our national leader, it is imperative that citizens watch the broadcasted presidential debates before casting
their ballots. These debates give each representative of the two most influential political parties, the Democrats and Republicans, time to demonstrate
their contrasting viewpoints, and otherwise allow the voter to understand each candidate's personality. During our psychology class this semester, we
were privileged to write essays on the three presidential debates between Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, and Republican nominee, Donald
Trump. In order to succeed in this task, it was imperative that we incorporate psychology terms in conjunction with the candidates; only now can we
reveal our informed opinions about the results of this 2016 Presidential Election. During the three presidential debates, I tried to watch Hillary Clinton
unbiased, as I admittedly wanted her to become our president. Overall, I found Clinton to be mature, and to be overwhelmingly habituated to Trump's
condescending comments. Despite Trump's disrespectful remarks regarding women and other minorities, Clinton was calm, and simply spoke to the
viewers regarding his rhetoric. Her peaceful demeanor demonstrated habituation in that, although Trump can become very offensive, she chose to rise
above the trying stimulus he displayed, and ultimately appeared to be the better candidate for presidential office. In response to audience phobias

Perception 's Configuration Of Reality : 45th Presidential...
Perception's Configuration of Reality: 45th Presidential Debate Jay Van Bavel's 2016 article addresses an important and relevant issue: voters' deeply
divided perceptions of presidential candidates. According to Bavel, approximately 70 million viewers tuned in to watch the final presidential debate on
October 19, 2016. In theory, one would be valid in assuming that while processing such an event, everyone should be experiencing the same reality–all
are watching the same debate, hearing the same words said by the same people. Strangely, however, this is not the case: in reality, Republicans and
Democrats concluded the debates with drastically separate conclusions on the candidates. According to a CNN poll referenced to within Bavel's
article, Hillary Clinton won the first debate, with 67% compared to Donald Trump's 27%. However, a further examination of these statistics reveals an
obvious divergence between the democratic and republican parties. According to democrats, Clinton won (89% to 5%); according to republicans,
Trump won (54% to 28%). Why is there such a great divide when both parties were presented with the exact same information? People do not see the
world objectively–without the influence of personal biases. Instead, people reinforce the goals and values of the partisan group they identify with,
allowing the party's views to color their perceptions of identical information (Bavel). According to a paper mentioned in the article, written by Bavel
and his research

First Presidential Debates

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jenna Welch

More from Jenna Welch (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

First Presidential Debates