The document discusses the strengths and weaknesses of an amateur documentary. It notes that the documentary came together best as a whole rather than any individual part. It was insightful but not that interesting. Establishing shots and close ups were used along with appropriate background music. Technology could be improved by using better cameras consistently rather than switching. The filming and theme of the documentary were likely what those reviewing it (OPM) liked best as it stood out from others through different shots and a different approach to the theme. Areas for improvement include shot order, time management, defining roles, and music/sound configuration.