The document discusses draft designs for an album cover and feedback received. Draft 1 was criticized for having too much contrast between colors and too many fonts. Draft 2 was called plain, boring, and unprofessional with uneven spacing. The font was also hard to see and not fitting the pop genre. Draft 3's bubble font was deemed childish and only suitable for a young audience. Moving the artist name to the center was recommended. Draft 4 incorporated feedback and was praised for its greater impact and ability to draw in audiences.

1. DRAFT 1 - “the fade istoo muchof a
contrast to the pink”
“there istoo manyfontsmakingit
unattractive tolookat”
“lack of convergence”
“needsa recordlabel”
DRAFT 2 - “The white makesitappearplain,boringand simple
and looksunprofessional andisnoteye-catching”
“the convergence isunevenlyseparatedwhichisvisually
unappealing”
“the font ishard to see anddoesnot conformto the popgenre”
“perhapsadd ina box”
DRAFT 3- “it shoutsouta veryyoungtargetaudience andscreamspop
genre,thisisnotconformingtothe urbanpop genre”
“experimentwithgoldfontsasitismore conventional”
“Try movingthe artistsname to the centre as it will be more effective in
drawinginthe audience.”
“the bubble fontremindsme of graffiti andlooks
childish –for a youngeraudience”
“go back to usinga dark backgroundas itwill draw ina
wideraudience atthe bottom”
DRAFT 4 - This ismuch betterithas a lotmore impact and drawsinthe
audience
I have gatheredfeedbackfromvariouspeopleincludingmyteacheronmydraftsand addedto
thiswordas I createdmydraft to show the processineditinginthe feedbackIhave been
given.