3. Visualising space
Mental/cognitive maps employed
Pathways as rulers, buildings as reference points
Haptic sensations sometimes stimulated an imagined view
4. The other somatic senses
Touch – Sensitive to material underfoot, subtle cues from hand
holding
Sound – Old Joe + library building site gave auditory clues to
location
Smell – Costa coffee instantly recognisable, Aston Webb smell
evocative
Taste? - Not so much…
Decreasing
order of
importance
5. Reflections on power
Opposite of intervention 2 – no gaze at all
Partner vs public power
Trust and deception
6. Links to academic thought
Pallasmaa - Visual and touch intimately related
Kristeva – Lack of frontal ontology as abject?
Foucault’s disciplinary gaze and the production of docile bodies