34. Zynga Case Study
• February 2012: No patents
• March 2012: acquires 38 patents
• October 2012: Partners with Bwin.party
• December 2012: Applies for Nevada licence
• January 2013: >100 patents and applications
42. DOMESTIC INVENTORS FOREIGN INVENTORS
Held Locally Held Overseas Held Locally
Acquisition by foreign firm
with investment in R&D
Third level focus on
patenting
Small local tech sector
Government incentives to
foreign firms to engage in
R&D activities
Incentive switch from
manufacturing to R&D
Extension of corporate IP
strategy
Local or Global HQ relocation
Acquisition of IP assets
Global structures
Source: Internal Research 2007-2012 publications
45. Never doubt that a small startup can take on a huge
monopoly. Indeed, it is the only thing that can.
46. Policy and governance will be as important as technology
in shaping what the market looks like in the coming years.
47. And that, of course, will shape how impactful our
portfolio companies are, and that will ultimately shape
our returns.
48.
49.
50. I’ve started to believe the leverage in the
“sharing economy” will be in opening
regulated industries.
Christina Cacioppo
http://www.christinacacioppo.com/blog/2013/04/03/sf-things/
51. [t]he challenges of the connected future are less technical and
more legislative, political and philosophical.
http://gigaom.com/2013/03/17/uber-data-darwinism-and-the-future-of-work/
Often hear that an IP right allows the owner to prevent someone using their IPOf course this is correct but the IP right is far richer that that.It’s a bit like saying a property right gives you the right to prevent someone coming onto your land or into your building but obviously property rights are far more that that.IP can be use a very effective tool to control the results of creativity and innovation. Preventing use is one thing but it also allows you to permit use, to move the results around in a safe and profitable way etc.