Teaching with ChatGPT-Practical Tips and Strategies
1. TEACHING WITH
CHATGPT
4th APR 2023
Practical Tips and
Strategies
www.upm.edu.my
Assoc. Prof. Ts. Dr. Nurfadhlina Mohd Sharef
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-
Lead),
Universiti Putra Malaysia
nurfadhlina@upm.edu.my
2. Assoc. Prof. Ts. Dr.
Nurfadhlina Mohd Sharef
Intelligent Computing Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science and Information
Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia.
nurfadhlina@upm.edu.my, 0126672504, https://sites.google.com/view/nurfadhlina
Affiliation:
1. Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science,
Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology,
Universiti Putra Malaysia.
2. Deputy Director (Innovation in Teaching and Learning),
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership
Excellence (CADe-Lead), Universiti Putra Malaysia.
3. Task Force Member, National Artificial Intelligence
Roadmap Implementation 2021-2025, MOSTI
4. Task Force Member, Health Workforce Culture Survey
Analytics, MOSTI
5. Interim Research Associate, Malaysia Institute for Ageing
Research (MyAGEING), Universiti Putra Malaysia.
6. Research Associate, Institute for Mathematical Research
(INSPEM), Universiti Putra Malaysia.
7. Secretary, Young Scientist Network-Academy of Sciences
Malaysia (YSN-ASM)
8. Chair, COVID-19 ASM Data Scientist Group, Academy of
Sciences Malaysia, MOSTI
Data Analytics
1. Digitalisation and IoT for Precision
Biodiversity
2.COVID19 Vaccination Distribution Planning
and Tracking
3. BSH- LHDNM Analytics Dashboard for
Program Bantuan Kerajaan
4. National Integrated Cybersecurity Threat
Factor Profiling
5. Learning Analytics and Chatbot for
Personalized Learning
Machine Learning
1. Deep Recurrent Q-Network Approach for
Multi Objective Recommendation System
2. Interactive Machine Learning based on Deep
Reinforcement Learning and Generative
Adversarial Network Hybrid for Digital Twin
Research Interests
● Artificial Intelligence
● Data Science and Data Analytics
● Text Mining and Question Answering
● Recommender Systems
● eLearning
Text Mining
1.Online Reputation Meter
2.Evolving Multi-Granular Temporal
Abstraction Method to Improve Clinical
Data Analysis
3.Multi-Tasking based Deep Learning for
Tweets Analytics
4.Deep Attention Model For Review-
based Multi-Criteria Recommendation
System
5.Sequence-to-Sequence Based Natural
Answer Generation Models
3. Safe and
responsible
AI
Practical tips and
strategies for
redesigning activities
Practical tips and strategies
for redesigning assessment
Introduction to
ChatGPT
2
3
4
1
CONCLUSION
Outlines
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
6. The allure of AI-powered tools to help
individuals maximize their understanding
of academic subjects by offering them
the right content, in the right way, at the
right time for them
✓ Enrich information discovery
experience
✓ Summarise and explain
✓ Answer questions
✓ Writing, composing and editing
✓ Increase productivity
We now live in GPT era…
Content
Type
Tool Application
Text Bard, ChatGPT,
ChatSonic, Claude,
Jasper AI
Conversation in question
answering
Image DALL-E, picsart, canva,
pixlr
Image generation
including photos and
artworks
Video Wibbitz, pictory,
Synthesia
Create short form
video online in minutes
Speech Whisper, Replicastudios AI voice actors
for games, film
& the metaverse
Audio Ampermusic, Veed, Murf Create your own songs
and compositions
6
7. ChatGPT is disruptive to education!
We shouldn’t turn a blind eye to it!
Educators need to redesign the
activities and assessments in their
teaching
Disruption in education: Have we learned our lesson?
2020. Online learning
2022. Generative AI
What’s next on the horizon?
12. AI is not new to us
Eg Face filter on TikTok
12
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
13. The top 20 positions that GPT-4 may replace in the future:
● Data entry clerk
● Customer service representative
● Proofreader
● Paralegal
● Bookkeeper
● Translator
● Copywriter
● Market research analyst
● Social media manager
● Appointment scheduler
● Telemarketer
● Virtual assistant
● Transcriptionist
● News reporter
● Travel agent
● Tutor
● Technical support analyst
● Email marketer
● Content moderator
● Recruiter
AI will also generate opportunities for people.
Job profiles like automation engineer, robotics
engineer, machine learning expert, deep
learning trainer, etc., will rise.
Positive factors of AI replacing manual jobs
include:
● Reduction in human errors
● Faster task completion
● Automation saves people from
doing tedious work
● Increases efficiency and
productivity
● Reduces monetary expenses
Src: https://www.mlyearning.org/jobs-are-in-danger-due-to-chatgpt-4/
15. The fun is to join into the storm
Warm-Up: Play With the Tool
1. Go to https://chat.openai.com/
2. Think about an action that you want to
perform in your lesson. Post an
incomplete sentence or ask it an
explanation
3. What is your observation of its
response? Keep on interacting with it
Centre for Academic Development (CADe) , UPM
16. Go to https://chat.openai.com/chat
1. Ask to create a lesson plan for a
topic
2. Specify that you want to conduct
group work among students
3. If you want the student to self-learn,
what needs to be changed?
4. What tips should you give to them
to complete the work?
1. Generate questions about the topic
2. Make the question harder
3. Change to multiple choice
questions
4. What are the answers to those
questions?
5. Create a rubric for this assessment
Centre for Academic Development (CADe) , UPM
17. can generate new text
based on the input they
receive
“GENERATIVE”
because they are
trained on a large
corpus of text data
before being fine-tuned
for specific tasks
"PRETRAINED"
because they use a
transformer based neural
network architecture to
process input text and
generate output text.
"TRANSFORMERS"
A Generative Pretrained
Transformer (GPT) is a
type of large language
model (LLM) that uses
deep learning to
generate human-like
text.
ChatGPT3 was
announced on
30/Nov/2022.
The magic
of ChatGPT
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
18. The use of ChatGPT in teaching and learning
1. Create lesson plans
2. Question answering
3. Text classification
4. Get fresh creative ideas or advise
for a refined thought
5. Create rubrics of assessments
6. Translate sentences
7. Compose a write up (e.g social
media posts, product review,
promotional copywriting)
8. Summarize text
9. Text completion
10. Get generated text in a particular
style (eg a 7-year old
understanding vs 27 years old)
18
You can keep on interacting with ChatGPT,
ask it to refine and personalise your request!
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
20. machine-learning techniques behind generative AI
have evolved over the past decade…
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
Content Type Tool Application Implementation
Paradigm 1: AI-
directed
Learner as
recipient
Behaviorism Earlier work on
Intelligent Tutoring
Systems; ChatGPT
Paradigm 2: AI-
supported
Learner as
collaborator
Cognitive, Social
constructivism
Dialogue-based
Tutoring Systems;
Exploratory Learning
Environments;
ChatGPT
Paradigm 3: AI-
empowered
Learner as
leader
Connectivism, Complex
adaptive system
Human-computer
cooperation;
Personalised/adaptive
learning; ChatGPT
20
27. Guides for educators to embrace ChatGPT in activities
1. Allow students to use ChatGPT and have a discussion on the rules of its usage.
2. Practice retrieval and other memorisation activities that specify certain time, topic or activities
conducted previously to ensure students take effort to understand and analyze any references they have
utilized.
3. Create more collaborative and discussion activities. When students discuss, they do so from their own
working and long-term memory. Sure, they can look up quick answers, but to carry on a conversation, most
of the work comes from their own thinking. After a discussion, students can recap the discussion and share
their reflections about it ... and that's much harder to do with a bot.
4. Emphasize experiential learning and engage students in personalized elaboration that relate to their
local surroundings and routines. Let students demonstrate what they have learnt. Asking students to bring
in ideas, evidence, perspectives, and data from contemporary or personal events or geographical contexts
will make it more difficult (although not impossible) for them to just ask an AI to write their assignment.
5. Conduct activity that requires students to use ChatGPT to answer questions related to a topic, and
experiment to identify questions that can’t be answered. This will let the students think critically and
dive deeper into the topic.
27
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
28. Practical steps to use ChatGPT in a lesson (my suggestion)
1. Identify lesson objectives
2. Conduct activities that have tasks requiring students to use ChatGPT. Inform
that they have to present their findings.
3. Observe their interactions with ChatGPT - look at the prompts they used. Ask
how they feel about using ChatGPT to complete that task.
4. Analyse your instructions and check whether they are too straightforward or
manage to encourage students build higher order thinking. Refine the
instructions if you have to, and explain to the students
5. Monitor how they are completing the task. Analyse the quality of answers and
their understanding through presentation.
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
29. Practical steps to use ChatGPT in a lesson (by ChatGPT)
1. Define the learning objectives: Before incorporating ChatGPT in your teaching, it is important to identify the
specific learning objectives that you want to achieve with your students. This will help you determine the types of
questions that you want to pose to ChatGPT and the specific topics that you want to cover.
2. Choose a platform: There are several platforms that you can use to integrate ChatGPT into your teaching, such as
Zoom, Microsoft Teams, or Google Meet. You can also use educational chatbot platforms like MobileMonkey or
Tars.
3. Introduce ChatGPT to your students: Begin by introducing ChatGPT to your students and explaining how it works.
You can use a brief presentation or a video to demonstrate how to ask questions and receive responses from
ChatGPT.
4. Pose questions to ChatGPT: Pose questions to ChatGPT that are related to the learning objectives you have
identified. This could include questions related to specific topics, as well as questions related to critical thinking
and problem-solving.
5. Evaluate responses: Evaluate the responses from ChatGPT to ensure that they are accurate and relevant to the
questions posed. Discuss the responses with your students and encourage them to provide feedback on whether
the responses were helpful or not.
6. Use ChatGPT for individual and group work: ChatGPT can be used for individual learning and research, as well as
for collaborative group work. Encourage your students to work together to ask questions and explore different
topics using ChatGPT.
7. Provide feedback: Provide feedback to your students on their use of ChatGPT, and encourage them to provide
feedback on their experiences. This will help you identify areas for improvement and make any necessary
adjustments to your teaching approach.
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
30. My experience
Lesson: Week 2
Objective: students
should be able to
compare sorting
algorithms and explain
the time complexity
Activity:
- Memory recall
- Find answers in
pairs
- Give presentation
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
31. Instructions
1. Choose 2 sorting algo. Provide
explanation on them
2. Find the algo and test the coding of
each sorting technique (prepare 2
examples of sequences, identify the
performance of each algo and how they
differ)
3. Find an answer why the gamma, theta,
and Big-Oh are as such
4. Discuss with your pair about the
characteristics of each algo and
compare their differences. Be prepared
to share your observation on each algo;
relate to the example sequences you
used
Name 1 Name 2 Algo 1 Algo 2
Aimman rusyaidi merge bubble
Idin Hariz selection insertion
Ryan Fahmi shellsort tree sort
Miqael Hazman Insertion Shellsort
Shree Fauzan Quicksort Heapsort
Aminnzz Yusmal Shellsort Selection
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
32. Observation (surface)
1. Students manage to complete
the task
2. They are free to express the
answer in a structure that they
are convenient with
3. Students are happy that they
can use ChatGPT to obtain
some answers
4. Students said that they also
mix with some other references
eg slides and website
5. Students said that the
questions are tough
6. It is the first time for
presentation in the course, they
are shy, but they tried
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
33. Observation (surface)
1. Students manage to complete the task
2. Students are happy that they can use
ChatGPT to obtain some answers
3. Students said that they also mix with some
other references eg slides and website
4. Students said that the questions are tough
5. It is the first time for presentation in the
course, they are shy, but they tried
But how can we
ensure that they
have a deep
understanding?
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
34. Instructions (round 1)
1. Choose 2 sorting algo. Provide
explanation on them
2. Find the algo and test the coding of
each sorting technique (prepare 2
examples of sequences, identify the
performance of each algo and how they
differ)
3. Find an answer why the gamma, theta,
and Big-Oh are as such
4. Discuss with your pair about the
characteristics of each algo and
compare their differences. Be prepared
to share your observation on each algo;
relate to the example sequences you
used
Name 1 Name 2 Algo 1 Algo 2
Aimman rusyaidi merge bubble
Idin Hariz selection insertion
Ryan Fahmi shellsort tree sort
Miqael Hazman Insertion Shellsort
Shree Fauzan Quicksort Heapsort
Aminnzz Yusmal Shellsort Selection
Low level thinking
Student confine their discovery
only on the assigned tasks. So
instructors need to scaffold with
summary activities with reflections
Collaborative learning
This is a high order thinking activity. Usually students wl have a
cold feet and struggle when they code. But ChatGPT provides the
code right away! Unfortunately, actually the students skip the
learning process!
Student actually doesnt understand this. They got the
answers but could not relate the time complexity with the
looping structure
Student tried to explain what they
understood but very shallow, and
cant give their observations
35. My intervention…
To ensure that they have
a deep understanding…
I provided a mind-map.
Students show a blank
face (indicates that they
still have low
understanding).
I probe further and
identify their
understanding is still low.
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
36. 1. Fill up slide 2&3 on the algo, and order of growth
1. Show the steps to sort 8,7,3,1,2 into an increasing order in
slide 4&5, and 2,1,3,7,8 in slide 6&7.
I used the following prompt in chatgpt:
● show the steps to sort 8,7,3,1,2 in increasing
order using <algo name> sort
● show the steps to sort 2,1,3,7,8 in increasing
order using <algo name> sort
I hv provided some examples. Pls complete them.
3. Find an answer why the gamma, theta, and Big-Oh are as
such. Discuss with your pair about the characteristics of each
algo and compare their differences. Write this in slide 8. Be
prepared to share your observation on each algo; relate to the
example sequences you used during our next lesson
Instructions (round 2)
in Week 3
● This activity is more
structured and guided.
● I improvised the
previous instructions
and ask students to
solve the sorting of the
same sequence so it is
easy for them to
compare
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
37.
38. My observations
1. By observing the students learning behavior, i can understand their learning patterns.
2. By providing the template, students are clearer on my expectations, and it is easier for me to
identify students who needs help.
3. After students have completed the answer, the first activity conducted is for them to identify
the characteristics. Although the answers are explicitly available, they couldnt relate to my
request (again! And this could be due to copy-paste from ChatGPT).
4. I guided them to compare the answers across all 8 algo. (You might seem this as spoon feed,
but beware, students learning processes are being disrupted too, and we need to SHOW
THEM WHY THEY NEED TO PUT PURE EFFORT TO LEARN).
5. The collaborative and experiential learning has enabled everyone in the class to identify the
criteria beyond the existing literature → this is PURE and authentic learning!
6. Listen to their reflection, and motivate them by interacting further allow us to have a deep
understanding and build connections with them
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
39. Important note to lecturers -> emphasising our role as
learning coaches
1. Students need to be taught how to learn (instead of us considering they have
learnt, while actually they only copy-paste from ChatGPT)
2. Lecturers need to unlearn and relearn (ChatGPT sometimes are better instructors.
We need to leverage this tech to make ourselves better)
3. Students need guidance and monitoring (various activities can be conducted to
allow for authentic learning attainment)
4. Lecturers should be ready for an agile teaching strategies (we need to scaffold,
mentor, and be prepared to redesign assessments and activities -> focus on
higher order thinking, eg let the students to critique the answers by ChatGPT as a
deep discourse on the subject matter. Socratic mindset need to be emphasised!)
5. Students need to be taught on how to be responsible learners. We need to be a
role model to them!
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
40. Practical tips for ChatGPT usage to support activity
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
41. Jigsaw activity
Jigsaw activities are a specific type of
information gap activity that work best
when used with the whole class.
The class is first divided into groups of four to
six learners who are then given some
information on a particular aspect of the topic
which they then become the experts in.
Students are dependent on each other to
succeed.
It breaks classes into groups that each
assemble a piece of an assignment and
synthesize their work when finished.
Collaborative teaching and learning strategy
that promotes an environment for structured
discussions for sharing knowledge and
perspectives. Students work in groups and
discuss a topic at several tables.
The process begins with the first of three or more
twenty-minute rounds of conversation for small
groups of four (five maximum) people seated
around a table. At the end of the twenty minutes,
each member of the group moves to a different
new table. They may or may not choose to leave
one person as the “table host” for the next round,
who welcomes the next group and briefly fills them
in on what happened in the previous round.
World cafe
43. Practical tips for ChatGPT usage to support activity
Small class Big class
Emphasize on problem solving and
experiential learning
Emphasize on problem solving
Let students learn collaboratively Let students learn collaboratively
Conduct activity that require students to
use ChatGPT and discuss alternative
solutions
Conduct activity that require students to
use ChatGPT and discuss alternative
solutions
Conduct jigsaw-based discussion, followed
by fishbowl presentation
Conduct world cafe-based discussion,
followed by fishbowl presentation
45. Safe and responsible use of AI in education?
Human-in-the-loop machine learning?
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
Technology is a facilitator for learning
Educators lead a crucial role in designing engaging
learning experience
A synergetic collaboration between multiple entities
(e.g., the learner, the instructor, information, and
technology)
in the system is essential to ensure the learner’s
augmented intelligence
Cheating? Honesty? Truthfulness? Recency? Privacy?
Misleading? Manipulation?
45
47. Three typical responses:
Ban ChatGPT
“Business as
usual”
Embrace
ChatGPT
The response we pick
must consider immediate
(course level – micro
picture) and future needs
(university level – macro
picture).
48. Balancing the risk (for cheating) versus
opportunities (for feedback)
Developing meaningful and
relevant assessments are
more important than investing
in student surveillance
techniques.
In fact, ChatGPT can
encourage learning through
making mistakes and receiving
feedback iteratively
(productive struggle).
Do we reward our students for
effort or outcome?
Are we indirectly incentivizing
cheating?
→ We should not deprive our
students from learning values
and skills they will need as adults.
Src: Wan Mohd Aimran Wan Mohd Kamil, UKM
49. Example. ChatGPT can provide feedback to students:
Can ChatGPT substitute educators?
Submits a
draft
Generates
feedback
Utilizes
feedback
Supplies
rubric
Submits student
work
Utilizes
feedback
49
Potentially, ChatGPT as
a teaching assistant.
Src: Wan Mohd Aimran Wan Mohd Kamil, UKM
50. Practical tips for ChatGPT usage to support assessment
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
51. Guides for educators to embrace ChatGPT in
1. Review your assessment; avoid straightforward questions or simple facts. Ask current, complex,
open, real-world problem, and based on a contextual topic or issues discussed in your lesson.
2. Be empowered with AI. Incorporate ChatGPT to personalise or draft a unique case study for
each student or their group based on their interest and level to use in your authentic assessment.
3. Include a section in assessments to let students to critique for improvements (what they got, if it
fits, how to organize it, how to communicate it effectively, etc.) and reflect their synthesis of the
information gathering through their reading, internet searching, peer discussions and ChatGPT
responses they have used and ask them to give their opinions and justifications.
4. Try different assessment types that are more immune to AI and can allow students to develop
and demonstrate understanding such as figurative related, oral assessment and live
demonstration. Additionally, staging assessments, such as requiring students to submit drafts,
receive feedback, and improve their work, are less prone to risk from generative AI.
5. Use ChatGPT to draft quiz questions and possible answers with feedback setting. Use
ChatGPT to generate a draft rubric that you can then refine.
51
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
52. Centre for Academic Development (CADe)
Only (a) is
correct, but
ChatGPT got
it wrong, most
probably
because the
logic is wrong.
Both answers
are correct,
and ChatGPT
got it correct
Clustering is an unsupervised learning. Look at the
answer generated. According to the rules of Truth
table, yes ^ no = no. But in ChatGPT the reasoning
needs some work. This is an example how we as a
human educator could tune our way of assessing
students. Rather than asking straight forward fact
(which is lower level of Bloom taxonomy), we could
test their analysis level eg C4
52
53. ChatGPT can
easily be tricked!
53
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
54.
55. How to detect GPT?
Educators need to redesign the activities and assessments in their teaching (as
advised in UPM’s guide for ChatGPT in teaching and learning). For detecting
ChatGPT, several tools can be used:
https://x.writefull.com/gpt-detector
https://detector.dng.ai
https://gptzero.me
https://writer.com/ai-content-detector/
55
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead) , UPM
58. Humanising and democratising fair and responsible AI
for education
How can AI be leveraged to enhance
education?
How can AI be best exploited for the common
good in education?
How can we ensure the ethical, inclusive and
equitable use of AI in education?
How can education prepare humans to live and
work with AI?
Centre for Academic Development (CADe) , UPM
59. For students, the biggest warning should be
that ChatGPT's "facts" cannot be taken as-is,
and students should question every piece
of text they get from an AI.
ChatGPT has been known to deliver
inaccurate information, so students should
now – more than ever – be aware of the need
to verify information they receive through
different sources.
We can assume that more and more AI tools
will be developed to help educators get a
sense of whether a piece of text is AI-
generated or not.
59
Suggestion to
students
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
61. More Suggestion to students
Is AI needed for this task?
Checking its accuracy
Keeping it honest
Give credit where it is due
Read more at https://keemanxp.medium.com/ai-usage-guidelines-for-students-
a-friendlier-sample-c978d831972f
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
62. Vicious versus virtuous loops
Generates
response
Give questions
Prompts Submits
Grades
Give questions
Generates
response
Prompts
Feedback
Submits-feedback-revises
Grades
Grades may not reflect student mastery
because ChatGPT short circuits student effort.
Grades reflect student mastery since ChatGPT
engages students in productive struggle.
62
Src: Wan Mohd Aimran Wan Mohd Kamil, UKM
64. The world’s citizens need to understand what the impact of AI might
be, what AI can and cannot do, when AI is useful, when its use
should be questioned, and how it might be steered for the public
good (UNESCO International Forum on AI and the Futures of Education under the theme of
Developing Competencies for the AI Era).
This requires everyone to achieve some level of competency with regard
to AI, including knowledge, understanding, skills, and value orientation.
Together, these might be called ‘AI literacy’.
Source:
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/
48223/pf0000380602
2022
AI literacy comprises both data literacy, or the ability to
understand how AI collects, cleans, manipulates, and analyses
data; and algorithm literacy, or the ability to understand how AI
algorithms find patterns and connections in the data, which might
be used for human-machine interactions.
AI Literacy =
Data Literacy +
Algorithm
Literacy
64
65. 1. Steer AI-and-education policy development and practices towards protecting human rights
and equipping people with the values and skills needed for sustainable development and
effective human-machine collaboration in life, learning and work;
2. Ensure that AI is human-controlled and centred on serving people, and that it is deployed
to enhance capacities for students and teachers.
3. Design AI applications in an ethical, non-discriminatory, equitable, transparent and
auditable manner; and monitor and evaluate the impact of AI on people and society
throughout the value chains.
4. Foster the human values needed to develop and apply AI.
5. Analyse the potential tension between market rewards and human values, skills, and
social well-being in the context of AI technologies that increase productivity.
6. Define values that prioritize people and the environment over efficiency, and human
interaction over human-machine interaction.
7. Foster broad corporate and civic responsibility for addressing the critical societal issues
raised by AI technologies (such as fairness, transparency, accountability, human rights,
democratic values, bias, and privacy).
8. Ensure that people remain at the core of education as an implicit part of the technology
design; and protect against automating tasks without identifying and compensating for the
values of current practices.
65
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
68. Takeaway message
Banning ChatGPT from teaching and learning is like shutting down the
students from the need to prepare themselves for this skill.
Emerging competencies are on resourcefulness and how to leverage
tools to be more productive.
Educator’s role is even more important now.. To ensure the students are
prepared for their unforeseen future. They need to be resilient. Focus on
critical thinking, communication, creativity, collaboration, and citizenship
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
69.
70. The positive effect from ChatGPT disruption on
university’s role to produce quality students
1. Focus on ability of the students to communicate clearly, coherently and
confidently
a. stop hiding behind lengthy reports with pages of appendices and truly think
about how to condense and articulate their report’s content in a dialogue that can
evolve their thoughts.
Src: https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/business-law/charting-new-course-university-education-age-chatgpt?fbclid=IwAR1_bVk5BlUWo4Fr69-
5w3wHnTeqexbuJ5oxRu0m0SLLMjnc7b2ecgIrqVc_aem_ARIuRjvCTjuC1PnjOdExO3nNFIvy3LneMCkk-icBjW9cowCFjegFWiE_X0weKw36Qb-
GUo8fUg4lCgyw70n3cdLULJrccwVVtP7d1mtZf5MM0BSFRwICpJYukl_nb_Vbf20
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
71. The positive effect from ChatGPT disruption on
university’s role to produce quality students
2. importance of experiential learning
a. Switch to “live” problems that are evolving in class, and stop feeding students
problems from the past.
b. learning happens in real time with the assistance of AI. We must focus on
providing students with hands-on, experiential learning opportunities.
c. Assessments should be increasingly based on creation, like producing practical
artefacts.
Src: https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/business-law/charting-new-course-university-education-age-
chatgpt?fbclid=IwAR1_bVk5BlUWo4Fr69-
5w3wHnTeqexbuJ5oxRu0m0SLLMjnc7b2ecgIrqVc_aem_ARIuRjvCTjuC1PnjOdExO3nNFIvy3LneMCkk-
icBjW9cowCFjegFWiE_X0weKw36Qb-GUo8fUg4lCgyw70n3cdLULJrccwVVtP7d1mtZf5MM0BSFRwICpJYukl_nb_Vbf20
Centre for Academic Development and Leadership Excellence (CADe-Lead), UPM
72. The positive effect from ChatGPT disruption on
university’s role to produce quality students
3. Assessing the quality of the process
a. students will have to work together, but this doesn't mean merely forming groups and
splitting up the work.
b. how students interact with one another. Are they able to collaborate effectively and
efficiently? Do they demonstrate professionalism, maturity and respect for one
another? Have they developed a set of protocols that allow them to work harmoniously
and productively together?
c. As we shift to a more dialogue-based approach to learning, the assessment will be
about the quality of the process rather than simply the outcome. Ultimately, it is time for
students to demonstrate that they can apply the principles upon which our cultures and
civilisations are built: to work together despite differences and diversity of
backgrounds.
Src: https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/business-law/charting-new-course-university-education-age-chatgpt?fbclid=IwAR1_bVk5BlUWo4Fr69-
5w3wHnTeqexbuJ5oxRu0m0SLLMjnc7b2ecgIrqVc_aem_ARIuRjvCTjuC1PnjOdExO3nNFIvy3LneMCkk-icBjW9cowCFjegFWiE_X0weKw36Qb-
GUo8fUg4lCgyw70n3cdLULJrccwVVtP7d1mtZf5MM0BSFRwICpJYukl_nb_Vbf20