Generational Themes In Hamlet

Generational Themes In Hamlet
Hamlet is a play that despite age, can deliver themes that consistently transcend generational differences, even when those differences span hundreds of
years. It is the strength of these themes in Hamlet that has given the play such overwhelming cultural gravitas that allows it to remain relevant to this
day. As such, it is a highly appropriate play forhigh school students to study. The core messages of generational conflict, unfolding to one's true self,
and morality are struggles faced by both Hamlet, and high school students. Consequently, this can motivate students in their studies when they discover
a character, that despite the difference in time, is so easily relatable. When students recognize similarities between Hamlet and themselves, such as a
distaste for the "tedious old fools" (2.2.219) with their "plentiful lack of wit" (2.2.199), it creates a connection between the students and this seemingly
ancient piece of literature. A connection, that hopefully after the high school level, can be nurtured into a passion for literature. A connection that
allows for greater insight and analysis at this current level. A connection, that if students are discouraged from making now, they are unlikely to make
later in their lives, as once they grow older "the heyday in the blood is tame." (3.4.69) and they will no longer be able to connect with the younger
characters such as Hamlet, or the "young Fortinbras, / Of unimproved mettle hot and full" (1.1.95–96).
High school
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Hamlet Soliloquy Analysis
In Hamlet's soliloquy in act IV scene iv, he brings up the question of "what is a man?" Hamlet does this while looking upon the over powering army
that is lead by Fortinbras. His army was passing through Denmark to fight over an insignificant piece of land in Poland. Hamlet then thinks about his
lack of action with his mission to kill Claudius. While he is seeing this massive army marching, going to war over something so insignificant he realizes
that he must try to make his "thoughts bloody" (4.4.64). In this soliloquy, we learn that through Hamlet's inaction he sees himself no better than a
beastly animal where he should see himself as a man that takes action into his own hands which, makes him as the same level as the gods. Hamlet
starts the soliloquy with the question, "what is a man?" Then he says, "If his chief good and market of his time but to sleep and feed? a beast, no
more" (4.4.33–35). Hamlet sees men that eat, sleep, and repeat as taking the easy road in life and not using any action in their lives. He believe that
men that live a life of inaction lead themselves to an early death. In Hamlet's eyes, men that eat, sleep, and repeat are no better then a beastly animal.
He hates men that live like this and believes that they are just waiting for their deaths to come like animals do. As time goes on Hamlet realizes that
he has been living a life of inaction because of his inability to kill Claudius. Hamlet then talks about how a man looks back on his past and learns
from it. This is where a man gets his wisdom from, "Bestial oblivion, or some craven scruple of thinking too precisely on the event, a thought which,
quartered, hath but one part wisdom" (4.4.41–43). Hamlet know that he has to avenge the death of his father but he is too cowardly to do it "and ever
three parts coward, I do not know why yet I live to say 'this thing's to do;' Sith I have caused and will and strength and means to do't" (4.4.44–47).
Hamlet realizes that he must take actions into his own hands and kill Claudius because he has everything in his power to do the deed. Hamlet see's
Fortinbras as a man of action, which he is. He is leading his army to fight over a small piece of insignificant land: "Truly to speak, and with

Fortinbras And King Hamlet
In the closing lines of William Shakespeare Hamlet, Fortinbras claims that if Hamlet had become king he "was likely.../To have proved most royal"
(5.2.376–77), however the truth of this statement is questionable. Shakespeare expresses the importance of a king possessing several qualities
throughout the play and it is debatable as to whether Hamlet meets the plays standards for a good king, particularly when compared to the plays other
real and potential kings. Shakespeare expressed the importance of a king's strong military presence through both Fortinbras and King Hamlet. The
revenge plots of Fortinbras and Hamlet display the strong sense of honour that a successful king requires as well as a king's willingness to defend that
honour. A strong sense of morality is another quality stressed throughout Hamlet, achieved through Shakespeare's treatment of Queen Gertrude's
relationships with Claudius, King Hamlet and Hamlet. Shakespeare utilizes the conflict between Denmark and Norway to display the importance of a
successful king having a strong military presence. King Hamlet's reign is strongly associated with war and the military and strong his military
presence continues is maintained throughout the play. Hamlet reiterates his father's strong military presence when viewing a picture of King Hamlet
and Claudius. He recalled that his father governed Denmark with "an eye like Mars to threaten and command" (3.4.75. l. 57), whereas Claudius is
portrayed as a sinful "devil" (l. 78)

The Consequences Of Death In Hamlet
In the tragic play, Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, Hamlet is a teenager and the son of the murdered King Hamlet. In light of King Hamlet's death,
Claudius, the brother of King Hamlet, takes the throne as well as his wife, Gertrude. In multiple scenes of the play King Hamlet's ghost appears and asks
Hamlet to get revenge on Claudius, who had murdered him. Hamlet's thoughts of suicide due to the murder of his father cause him to begin to go
insane, however the idea of killing Claudius causes Hamlet to begin to act more strangely and contemplate decisions such as love, and getting revenge
on Claudius. Although Hamlet's murder of King Claudius could be considered an immoral act, the justified killing will ease both Hamlet's mental state
and the unsettled state of the country.
Claudius' lack of control will cause Denmark to be attacked by Norway, so killing Claudius will cause the country to no longer be in decline. After
celebrating the marriage of Gertrude and Claudius, the now King, announces a letter that has been sent by Fortinbras of Norway. According to
Claudius, Fortinbras has "a weak supposal of our worth/...colleagued with this dream of his advantage,/ he hath not failed to pester us with message
/ importing the surrender of those lands/ lost by his father (I.ii. 17–24). Fortinbras's dream of acquiring the lands in Poland causes great tension between
the two countries, especially since Claudius is pestered and perturbed by the weak idea. By reading this Claudius is

Hamlet : Fortinbras Importance Essays
Fortinbras: An Important Character in Hamlet
Oftentimes, the minor characters in a play can be vital and, among other things, function to further the action of the play or to reveal and illuminate the
personalities of other characters. In Hamlet, Fortinbras, the Norwegian Prince, serves as the most important foil of Hamlet and provides us with the
actions and emotions in which we can compare to those of Hamlet and better reveal Hamlet's own character. Because Hamlet and Fortinbras both lost
their fathers and have sworn to avenge their deaths, Fortinbras is a perfect parallel of Hamlet. He was also very crucial to the play's ending and to bring
a remedy to the corruption that has plagued Denmark.
Fortinbras' father, King of Norway,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is inspiring to Hamlet and it pushes him forward in carrying out his plan to kill Claudius. Hamlet's last lines, "How all occasions...my thoughts be
bloody or be nothing worth!"(4.5, 34–69) say that Fortinbras has won him over from any further doubts and Hamlet, too, wishes to become a man of
action who is ready to take his revenge at any cost.
It can be said that Fortinbras is an energetic leader and soldier with clear intentions from the way he can quickly assemble his men to attack Poland.
Although Fortinbras says that Hamlet was a soldier, too, "and for his passage, the soldier's music..."(5.2, 444–445), the reader sees Hamlet only as a
scholar because he seems to only think things out rather than take action. Though, Fortinbras' statement helps us understand that Hamlet was once
indeed a good soldier. Scene two of the last act of Hamlet reveals the true character of Fortinbras. After arriving at Elsinore, he immediately acts upon
seeing the disturbing scene, much like he acts in battle, "Let four captains bear Hamlet like a soldier..."(5.2, 441–450).
Fortinbras is necessary to the storyline and he is important to the resolution of the corruption in Elsinore Castle, "Something rotten in Demark"(1.5,
100). He is needed to correct the corruptness, as he is the only noble left to claim the throne, the task he had ironically set out for, and because he
desires to fight for glory and to expand his empire, he is fitted by character to inherit the Kingdom of Sr. Hamlet.

Hamlet Character Analysis
It's hard to change; learning you were mistaken in front of your peers and trying to recover from it is tough. In the end, however, we learn and grow
more when we make mistakes than being right all the time, and so our faults are invaluable to our success. In William Shakespeare's Hamlet, the play's
very own namesake endures a trial of his own sanity as he attempts to avenge his father's death that unleashes the inner mechanisms of his thoughts and
misconceptions to the audience. By the end of the play, we can conclude that Hamlet was an unfortunate prince that transforms from a hesitant yet
beloved figure into a hero of enormous mental strength and ambition.
Hamlet comes to massive conclusions about life over the course of the five acts, and perhaps finally has the definitive answer in why we live: to not
die. In Hamlet's fourth soliloquy, he ponders if life's worth living at all, "To be, or not to be?" (Shakespeare 3.1.57) as he phrases it, but quickly
realizes that "...the dread of something after death, / The undiscovered country from whose bourn / No traveler returns..." (Shakespeare 3.1.80–83)
greatly outweighs "[the] grunt and sweat under a weary life," (Shakespeare 3.1.79). Death is such an abstract concept to humans, particularly the
afterlife: when we die, what happens next? Is all we feel devoid of everything, a blank white space? Is there a divine figure who will determine our
fate? Will our thoughts and soul cease to exist suddenly? We will never truly know until

Hamlet: A National Hero?
The stage is awash with the aftermath of a fateful battle. A lifeless king rests amid the corpses of his family and followers, slain for his sins. His
nephew, Hamlet, has just taken the life of the man who stole King Hamlet's crown and passes on with the confidence that he has just liberated his
nation, Denmark, from an oppressive ruler. Unfortunately, whatHamlet fails to grasp is the amount of incalculable sacrifices that guided him to be able
to tear away Claudius' crown. In actuality, the lack of animosity in Claudius' character as well as the sheer destruction that resulted from Hamlet's
journey to avenge his father acts as evidence to the poignant truth: Hamlet was responsible for his country's decay and cannot be considered the ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hamlet aspires to resolve his father's murder with "bloody" action (IV.v.69). For that reason, when Hamlet succeeds in impaling his uncle upon the
rapier and forcing him to consume the poisoned elixir, "[Shakespeare] has depicted in [Hamlet] a true national hero" (Crawford). According to this
belief, as Hamlet has taken the life of the man that killed King Hamlet and was powerless to stop Denmark from falling to Fortinbras, the Danes have
been lifted from danger and the prince Hamlet can be deemed a "savior." Yet, this victory is short lived when compared to the impairment Hamlet has
brought his nation and the amount of lives he has spent in his whirlwind of destruction. Crawford's idealistic view of Hamlet fails to support itself
when weighed against the unfortunate truth–Hamlet cannot be savior of Denmark. This can be seen in the way that Claudius was not the despicable,
vulnerable king that Crawford demonstrates in his writings. He was not the tyrannical monarch many perceive him to be throughout the play.
"...Claudius is not wholly evil–far from it," G. Wilson Knight claims. "We see the government of Denmark working smoothly. Claudius shows every
sign of being an excellent diplomat and king" (Knight 266). Claudius was entirely capable of settling his conflict with Norway, in contrast to
Crawford's insight, as he simply elected to be peaceful rather than brash as the elder Hamlet had been. This doesn't make

Fortinbras In Hamlet
William Shakespeare's play, Hamlet, is full of revenge and hesitation. Young Hamlet plans to seek revenge on Claudius for killing his father and
former King of Denmark. Hamlet is hesitant about his revenge until he hears about Fortinabras setting off a meaningless war for a small portion of
land. Through the thoughts and feelings shared in Hamlets speech it is evident he is moved by Fortinbras. Hamlet's character is inspired by Fortinbras
actions, allowing the character and the audience to gain a better understanding of Hamlet himself.
Firstly, Fortinbras actions cause Hamlet's turning point to take revenge. Hamlet realizes he needs to take action on his revenge. "Of thinking too
precisely on th'event – a thought which, quartered, hath but ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hamlet is inspired by Fortinbras actions to fight. "Rightly to be great is to not stir without great argument, but greatly to find quarrel in a straw when
honor's at the stake" (IV, iv, 52–55). Fortinbras leading his people to fight over pointless land inspires Hamlet in a way that you do not have to fight
for a good reason to be truly great. If your own honor was at stake you fight over nothing. His father was murdered and mother is defiled, Hamlet
will not give up his great honor and will become a fighter. Hamlet compares himself to Fortinbras confidence and ambition. "Witness this army of such
mass and charge led by a delicate and tender prince, whose spirit with divine ambition puffed makes mouths at the invisible event, exposing what is
mortal and unsure to all that fortune, death, and danger dare, even for an eggshell" (IV, iv, 46–52). Hamlet is moved by the willingness of Fortinbras to
devote the energy of an entire army, risking many lives including his own, to win over worthless land in Poland. Hamlet sees how confident and
ambitious Fortinbras is putting his life at risk, so he wants to become just as ambitious and confident. Therefore, Fortinbras determination causes
Hamlet to be

Bitter Imagery in Hamlet Essay
Bitter Imagery in Hamlet
In Hamlet, imagery of disease, poison and decay, are used by Shakespeare for a purpose. The descriptions of disease, poison, and decay help us
understand the bitter relationships that exist in the play and Hamlet's own cynicism. We see Hamlet's pessimism in his soliloquy when he contemplates
suicide. The resentful relationship that exists between Claudius and Hamlet is heightened with the use of imagery when Claudius asks about Polonius.
Imagery enhances Claudius' abhorrence of Hamlet. Shakespeare uses imagery in this play to deepen our understanding of the emotions experienced.
The imagery of decay is used to help comprehend the depression Hamlet feels in his first ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To keep it from divulging let it feed/ Even on the pith of life,"(IV; i, 21–23) This is spoken by Claudius, when he is with the queen, after the death of
Polonius. The King says that he is the owner of a foul disease, which is Hamlet. He feels that he must keep Hamlet hidden to avoid embarrassment
and others' scorn. Claudius compares Hamlet to a disease, in such a way that as wretched and disgusting as it may be,it should be kept from the
public. We can see that he despises Hamlet greatly and won't allow him to ruin his life. This shows us how endless Claudius' hatred is towards
Hamlet. Claudius' extreme anger and frustration is displayed when he says, "For like the hectic in my blood he rages, And though must cure
me."(IV;iii, 62–63) Claudius describes Hamlet as a vicious disease travelling in his own blood. Hamlet is so deep in the midst of Claudius' pure
distaste for him, that he wants Hamlet dead. When Hamlet is gone, then and only then, Claudius can be cured from the atrocious disease that he suffers
terribly from. The images of disease express the genuine feelings felt by Claudius. Imagery highlights the poor, horrid relationship that exists between
father and stepson. Shakespeare illuminates Claudius' true sentiment with the imagery of disease.
Hamlet gravely carries a hatred for his uncle, now step–father, and king of England. Hamlet knows his uncle killed his father and this is the stem of his
hatred. Hamlet can

Hamlet Fortinbras Revenge
A recurring theme throughout Shakespeare's Hamlet is a son's quest for revenge. Shakespeare portrays three instances where the father of a prince or
nobleman is killed, and the son puts it upon himself to avenge his father's unjust and unwanted death. The play opens soon after the death of the late
King Hamlet of Denmark. The details are cloudy, and the truth of his death has yet to be discovered by the characters. Hamlet's grief is turned to
determined revenge when he sees an apparition which seems to be his father. Upon discussing the murder with the ghost, Hamlet agrees to kill the new
king, Claudius: "And thy commandment alone shall live within the book and volume of my brain, unmixed with baser matter. Yes, by heaven! O most
pernicious woman! O villain, villain, smiling, damned villain!" (Hamlet, Act 1, Scene 5, 102–106). Young Hamlet is further disgusted by the new
incestuous marriage that holds the throne. This antipathy only goes to increase his motivation to go through with his revenge. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
At the open of the play, the king of Norway has been slain by the king of Denmark, and because of so the King Hamlet has claimed much of
Norway. "Dared to the combat; in which our valiant Hamlet... Did slay this Fortinbras; who... Did forfeit, with his life, all those his lands which he
stood seized of, to the conqueror... Now, sir, for young Fortinbras, of unimproved mettle hot and full, hath in the skirts of Norway, here and there,
sharked up a list of lawless resolutes" (Hamlet, Act 1, Scene 1, 84–98). Then, before he brings his marauders into the Danish mainland, he is bribed by
his uncle to divert his assault to Poland. This alludes to Fortinbras' true character, as a powerful yet weak–willed prince, who can be diverted from
revenge in the shadow of his father's death by a few

Revenge By William Shakespeare 's Hamlet, And Sophocles '...
Introduction
Revenge has always been an exciting theme to incorporate into any literary work. This revenge adds conflict, action, and contrast to any story. There
have been hundreds of thousands of stories and tales which cause readers to experience similar feeling to that of the main characters. With revenge, the
reader may side with the main character whether or not the main character is morally right or wrong. By human nature, people around the globe have
always been trying their hardest to come out on top in arguments or fights (Price 2009). As humans, they want to win. This is how a story about
revenge is so well loved and experienced by many as it relates well with human nature and how a person would react to these situations. It is a natural
feeling every single person feels at some point in their lives. Two well–known tales call this vengeful mode of literary artwork their own as they both
portray characters who strive for revenge. These stories are Shakespeare's Hamlet, and Sophocles' Antigone. Shakespeare, a very famous playwright
created his play with the intention of showing the audience how revenge returns to haunt the vengeful. He also showed how seeking revenge is not
the ideal way of dealing with a situation. Sophocles created his play to show how justice can be better and more worthy than just seeking revenge.
But he also how to be careful for seeking justice can turn into seeking revenge and a full circle back to the demise of the vengeful as well. There

The Challenges Of Anachronism In William Shakespeare's Hamlet
An anachronism is a thing belonging or appropriate to a period other than that in which it exists. Throughout the play, this resembles Hamlet's thoughts,
emotions, and morals. Hamlet faces countless moral challenges that he must mostly take on alone. The only person that helps him is Horatio, whom he
trusts dearly. It is through these challenges that shows a different type of thinking compared to other characters in the play. The wayHamlet responds,
handles, and reacts to his moral issues tells the reader about his type of thinking and suggests that it is a newer age of reasoning. Hamlet represents a
new type of thinking where he needs to justify his actions, he has a moral conscious, and his sense of personal integrity accounts for his hatred of
deception.
Hamlet procrastinates the act of avenging his father due to his need to justify his actions to himself. After Hamlet receives information and commission
from the ghost, he feels obligated to restore the great chain of being but needs to prove it truthful before he goes through with any action. "observe my
uncle if his occulted guilt do not itself unkennel in one speech, it is a damned ghost that we have seen and my imagination's are as foul as Vulcan's
stithy" (3.2.78–83). Hamlet purposely puts on a plate intending to uncover Claudius's guilt. He will believe the ghost's words to be faithful if Claudius
shows visual signs of his guilty conscience about killing King Hamlet. Hamlet knows now that he must kill Claudius,

The Exposition Of Hamlet By William Shakespeare Essay
According to David Ball, in his book Forwards and Backwards, " you can't begin to find a play's meaning until you comprehend its works" (Ball 3).
William Shakespeare's Hamlet is an excellently written dramatic tragedy, that when analyzed well, is a dynamically diverse piece of literature. Hamlet
is an ideal play for analyzing, with much exposition, clear stasis and intrusion, good use of theatrical elements, suspenseful forwards, and multiple
cause and effect triggers and heaps.
The exposition in Hamlet is in constant development throughout act I, scenes i and ii, as the characters, in a natural way, give the audience
information about the current state of Denmark. From the first scene of act I, it is revealed that the characters Horatio, Bernardo, Francisco, and
Marcellus, are guards for the palace in Denmark. As they speak, the audience realizes that for the last few nights an apparition has been appearing at
the same time every night, midnight, the time when the play begins. More exposition is then revealed through Horatio as he speaks about the ghost
and it's possible relationship to the previous war against Norway, as well as the effects the war had on the characters present.
Our last king, whose image even but now appeared to us, was, as you know, by Fortinbras of Norway, thereto pricked on by a most emulate pride,
dared to the combat; in which our valiant Hamlet–for so this side of our known world esteemed him–did slay this Fortinbras; who by a sealed compact
well

Fortinbras Revenge
Hamlet is a character that illustrates throughout the play, one of thoughtfulness, morality and human triumph. He delays enacting revenge against his
uncle, the now King of Denmark, for killing his dear father, the former King of Denmark, because he feels as though it is not right and goes against
his morals. He is a scholar, in his thirties and has strong spiritual beliefs. Dealing with the concept of murder and his mother having recently remarried
to his uncle, is all too much to deal with. Hamlet is not savouring his revenge and feels a sense of inadequacy throughout the play. Paralleling these
events is Fortinbras, who also has recently lost his father, King of Norway, slain by Hamlet's father. These two lives are intertwined with similarities...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This however, in Shakespeare's days was considered a moral sin, another dilemma for Hamlet.
Hamlet ironically causes Ophelia to commit suicide by the use of hurtful words. He does this throughout the play and with great impact.
This rich language illustrates how Hamlet feels. He is not a man without motive. This is all part of his plan to get revenge for his father, even though
it takes a very long time. Fortinbras's road to revenge is a tremendous contrast to that of Hamlet. Fortinbras reacts decisively at the news of his father's
death, by organizing an army and taking instant and calculating revenge to get back the land owed to him. He does this is a noble manner and even
Hamlet comments on this when he encounters him on the field.
Hamlet respects Fortinbras for taking immediate action to regain his father's land.
This Hamlet states before dying.
Hamlet is not crazy and knows he must save his own moral honour and bring justice to his father's murderer. It is clear to see the pressure that Hamlet
was put under by his father's Ghost to avenge his killer. Hamlet is a thoughtful, principled young man and refuses to become the revenger. He is
determined to protect his own honour and therefore maintain his morality and therefore in the end becomes a heroic spiritual figure. Hamlet is clever
and in his delaying, he plans a "play with–in a play" to set a "mouse–trap" so he can trap

Fortinbras Masculinity In Hamlet
By portraying masculinity as taking aggressive, impulsive action as well as having a strong demeanor of calm and collectiveness, Shakespeare furthers
divide the gender roles in women and men, criticizing and bringing to light the male–dominated culture Hamlet takes place in. As foils for Hamlet,
when they hear of their fathers' deaths, Fortinbras and Laertes immediately take action to avenge their deaths. Compared to Hamlet who takes almost the
entirety of the book to gather his courage to go through with killing Claudius, Fortinbras, without a moment to spare, raises an army to reclaim his
father's lost territory, conquering country after country under his father's honor. When comparing himself with, Hamlet says, "Witness this army of
such mass and charge/ Led by a delicate and tender prince,/ Whose spirit with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While Hamlet cowards with fear over his inability to kill Claudius due to overthinking, Fortinbras acts on instinct and proceeds to take immediate
action as he sees fit. Unlike Hamlet, he does not think before he acts and is admired by Hamlet for this masculine quality.
While Hamlet's decision to take revenge is created due to the help of the ghost of his father, Laertes needs no help from anybody else in order to
make his resolve to kill Hamlet. Upon hearing Hamlet's killing of his father, Laertes exclaims, "How came he dead? I'll not be juggled with. To hell,
allegiance! Vows, to the

The Power Of Freedom In Hamlet
Freedom Only for the Powerful
It is easy to view the characters in Hamlet as being completely helpless to the external forces that control their lives. This idea is pointed out by
Michael Shelden in his article, "The Imagery of Constraint in Hamlet," which uses Maurice Charney's book to further assert that all characters do
not have control over their destiny, supported with the use of traps in the play. However, both Charney and Shelden fail to represent that power
structure plays a large role in destiny and they push all characters into the same powerless category. Shelden neglects to recognize Claudius has more
freedom compared to any of the other characters because of his power. Within the play, Claudius is able to reach his ultimate goals before the play
even begins by marrying the queen and obtaining the position as king. He continues to prove his freedom as the controller of the traps in the play and
has the power to control the characters' freedom with the use of these traps. Even as Hamlet attempts to trap him, Claudius is able to escape both times,
showing the control he has over his freedom. When focusing on the power structure of the characters, Shelden's assertion fails to recognize that
although the characters in Hamlet are controlled, Claudius is the only character that has power over his freedom and that of other characters.
Shelden's vague assertion fails to recognize that Claudius is the least trapped of the characters considering he is able to get the majority of what he
wants in his life. Shelden's broad argument makes readers assume all characters have equal constraint throughout Hamlet. He writes, "Again and again
in the play, we witness the profound inability of the major characters to manage the course of their lives" (Shelden 355). The major characters in the
play include Hamlet, Polonius, Ophelia, Gertrude, and of course, Claudius. Claudius, however, shows that he actually is able to manage his own life
until the end, when he falls to his death. Readers can see his freedom and ability to choose within his prayer asking for forgiveness. He shows that he
received all he wanted through the murder of his brother. Claudius admits, "Of those effects for which I did the murder: / My crown,

Difference Between Fortinbras And Hamlet
On the chopping block next, Fortinbras. Fortinbras is the son of the late king of Norway. Fortinbras and Hamlet have very similar family situations the
only difference between the is that Hamlet handled his dad dying much worse than Fortinbras. Rather than sulking and acting a teenager in a break up,
Fortinbras took action. Fortinbras went and took back the land that his father lost to Hamlet's father. The strength of Fortinbras is great and is
recognized by Horatio in act one, scene one "So by his father lost. And this, I take it, Is the main motive of our preparations, The source of this our
watch, and the chief head Of this posthaste and rummage in the land." This recognition of Fortinbras is important because once Hamlet dies the young

Foils Of Fortinbras In Hamlet
A story would go nowhere without the characters making something happen. Characters are used for everything in a story, they set the scene, make
the plot happen, and everything inbetween. Characterization is a major deal for writers because without proper characterization, the plot will not be
able to go the way they want it to. This is also a big factor for the play, Hamlet, by William Shakespeare. He uses so many different characters to
really push certain things to the audience, and to make the reader understand it so well. The use of the foils, which is the use of two completely
opposite characters, in the play really helps get across the point that Shakespeare wants to convey to the reader . Without the use of these foils, the play
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Horatio, unlike Laertes and Fortinbras, was very level headed and almost scared. He wanted to protect Hamlet, and make sure he was making the
right decisions, but Hamlet was very quick to make decisions, even when he spoke he had a very little filter on what came out of his mouth. Hamlet,
who was not quick to avenge his father's death, was quick to many other actions, and Horatio was a lot more guarded on what he thought Hamlet
should do. Without Horatio, no one would have been watching out for Hamlet, Horatio was used to be an example of just how cautious Hamlet should
have

Fortinbras: A Short Story
As the sun rose over the fortress it cast a vibrant orange light across the gentling swaying water. Young Fortinbras, perched in a watch tower adjacent
to the water, was awestruck as the rising light revealed incoming Danish warships quickly advancing towards the fortress, pushed along by the howling
wind. As the ships parted the water with their shear force he scrambled down the winding stairs to the court yard, crowded with weapons in preparation
for the inevitable invasion, and sounded the warning bell. As the echoes hammered through the castle the knights rose and the king paced out of his
chamber into the courtyard. "What is it my son?" questioned Fortinbras, the words stumbling out of his mouth. "It is Denmark lord, they're here. There
If the Danish reach Oslo our kingdom will fall, and our people will die, so stand with me and fight the hoard that beckons beyond those doors," the
king spoke as the gates screeched on their rusty hinges and archers took their positions along the fortress wall. As the gates parted, the Danish
knights lead by King Hamlet made landfall, whilst troops on warships lit the fuse on heavy, rusted iron canons. As the fire burnt towards the black
powder chamber, the Norwegian knights lead by Fortinbras advanced on Hamlet's army at which arrows where fired which fell like heavy rain
towards them. The Danish knights rose there shiny, silver shields above them deflecting the arrows which left the slightest mark. As the black powder
exploded cannonballs where projected with ferocious speed to towards the Norwegian archers. The cannon balls collided with the wall, on which the
archers stood, causing the stone to crack and the wall to crumble. The fortress wall fell with the intensity of thunder creating an avalanche of stone
burying the archers and any knights who stood below in pile of thick, immovable

Essay about Analysis of Shakespeare's Hamlet
An individual plays a vital role in keeping patience to reveal the truth. In the play HAMLET, Shakespeare demonstrates the way of thinking of a
character and how they deal with it. Through the comparison of two characters of hamlet and Ophelia, the reader is shown the nobility roles, madness
and their tragic deaths after the death of their father. "O heart, lose not thy nature". Viewing the wordings of these particular words, we can observe how
hamlet endeavors to make himself patient in the position of being dealt as a son, while he goes to his mother. His noble way of controlling ... Show
For him it was not the right time to do so, which is true. His patience was the reason for his traps to take the revenge for his father's death, as a result
which reveals the truth at the end when Claudius asks for light where there the light is referred to the opening of the truth. On the same parameter, if
we see Ophelia, it shows her madness, after her father's death. This was her reaction to her father's death, as she collected pansies, fennel, columbines
and some others after her father's death to demonstrate love, false promises, repentance and faith fullness. These were the injustices and her reactions to
her father's murder. This was so critical situation that she also commits suicide as it's the human nature to love their parents no matter how cruel of
harsh they may be. As a daughter she loved her father, cared for him and lost her state of mind after his death. And this rushed her to commit suicide,
and moreover if we glance at hamlet, his struggle gave him what he wanted, Claudius's death, and he died as a tragic and ideal prince.
"...but I do prophesy that election lights on Fortinbras". His ideal character and the truthfulness made him to think about Fortinbras, and his status.
Hamlet's patience agreed to the honor

Example Of Corruption In Hamlet
In every state there is corruption. Anything that seems pure is most likely to be corrupt in reality, infected with the disease of sin. It is with this regard
that Shakespeare presents the plot of his infamous play Hamlet, in which many characters recognize the ubiquitous corruption of their surroundings. In
Hamlet, Shakespeare ties his characters together around the concept of a poisoned kingdom through imagery and diction to reveal the inherent
corruption in man. Shakespeare communicates to his audience the true setting of the play and its poisoned kingdom through evocative imagery. By
detailing images of a diseased state, Shakespeare ensures that the audience is able to easily grasp the idea of the corruption that is poisoning ... Show
An audience from the twenty–first century can not only understand the poisoned kingdom of Denmark, but also the poisoned nature of mankind.
Hamlet describes society's corruption as coming from a hell that "breathes out / Contagion to this world" (III.ii.329–330), which is still applicable today
despite the great distance of time from Shakespearean times to today. In today's world, we still experience murder, revenge, incest, and guilt, just as the
characters in Hamlet do. And not only does Shakespeare's insight to the nature of mankind impact our world today, but also his very words that tell the
story of innate corruption. The pure poetry and genius of Shakespeare's literature is still appreciated to this day, yielding even greater significance to
the message within each work. All in all, Shakespeare uses his characters, imagery, and diction to convey his insights of the intrinsic, corrupted nature
of man. The concept of a poisoned kingdom ties Shakespeare's message together and paints a continuous picture of sickness for his audience to

Fortinbras Glory In Hamlet
Decisive and possessing a strong desire for glory, Fortinbras would act preferably as king compared to Hamlet, who behaves too capriciously and
emotionally. In the beginning of the play, Horatio recounts how "Young Fortinbras, / Of unimprovГЁd mettle hot and full, / Hath in the skirts of
Norway here and there / Sharked up a list of lawless resolutes," gathering a group of soldiers to take back the lands lost by his father. While such an
act may seem careless or unnecessary, Fortinbras's commitment demonstrates a sense of honor, which he aims to fulfill by bringing Norway to its
former glory. In addition, Fortinbras later demonstrates this same dedication through his "fight for a plot / Whereon the numbers cannot try the cause."
Although the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although Hamlet loves Ophelia, as he clearly indicates when he bursts out at her grave and exclaims, "I loved Ophelia," he confuses her with harsh
comments. When Hamlet encounters Ophelia with the knowledge that someone is watching, he acts cruelly, telling Ophelia "I loved you not."
Hamlet's emotional games with her, regardless of whether he intends to hurt her, create conflict and feelings of heartbreak in Ophelia. Moreover,
Hamlet's killing of Polonius amplifies his negative effect on Ophelia, leading to her descent into madness and eventual death. Comparatively, Polonius
and Laertes affect Ophelia less directly, but they still influence her negatively by contributing to her emotional struggle regarding her relationship with
Hamlet. Before leaving, Laertes warns "For Hamlet, and the trifling of his favor, Hold it a fashion and a toy in blood . . . not permanent, sweet, not
lasting." In addition, after Laertes's departure, Polonius scolds Ophelia, stating, "Do not believe his [Hamlet's] vows." While Laertes speaks kindly and
both he and Polonius mean well, by pulling Ophelia away from Hamlet, they contribute to her inner conflict. Overall, Hamlet, Laertes, and Polonius
each affect Ophelia negatively, causing her emotional harm, and in Hamlet's case, driving her to madness and

Fortinbras Vs Hamlet
Fortinbras and Hamlet both had lost their fathers in the hands of somebody else, Hamlet lost his father to Claudius and Fortinbras lost his father by
Hamlet's father. Both the men are in the position of being either the heir or the princes of their countries and needing to revenge their fathers' deaths.
However, the main difference between the two would be that Fortinbras is not afraid to invade another country to gain back what his father lost in the
past. Hamlet tends to procrastinate and wait for things to happen on their own. Hamlet looked up to Fortinbras when he heard that he was invading
Poland. Hamlet thought to himself that if Fortinbras can raise an army and invade Poland in such a short amount of time then why is it taking Hamlet

Hamlet And Fortinbras Analysis
In Hamlet by William Shakespeare, Prince Hamlet (known as Hamlet) faces many trials and tribulations such as his father dying, his right to the throne
being taken after his mother remarries his uncle, then his love Ophelia, dies. Two characters, Laertes and Fortinbras Jr. (henceforth Fortinbras), have
similar troubles. All three of their fathers die, and in reaction, they all take revenge. Hamlet and Fortinbras have the throne taken from them by their
uncles, while Laertes and Hamlet both have Ophelia's death to deal with. This introduces Laertes and Fortinbras as character foils, to Hamlet.
Hamlet, Fortinbras, and Laertes all share the experience of their fathers dying and they all react by retaliating. Not only did their fathers die, but ... Show
They at her funeral but for Hamlet it is a onetime thing. Hamlet's hate started when he kills Polonis. "Oh, I am slain," sums up Polonius's death. Of
course Hamlet is not directly involved in Ophelia's death but him rejecting her, saying "...get thee to a nunnery" was his way of convincing Ophelia
that he no longer loves her. This shows how he wanted her off his back to protect her or he used her. Hamlet and Laertes both mourn her in very
dramatic ways. At her funeral, Hamlet and Laertes both jump in the grave screaming at her funeral Hamlet and Laertes both jump in the grave
screaming let me be buried with her "Be buried quick with her?–and so will I." Hamlet puts it very clearly on how he wants to be buried with her,
rather than Laertes. They both then go on to argue in her grave about who loved her more. Hamlet shows how he only cares about his father's death.
He does not mourn Ophelia anymore throughout the end of the play, which shows how he gave up on her love, soon after she died, or perhaps he
never cared for

Hamlet And Fortinbras Essay
The Prince, by Niccolo Machiavelli describes the prince as one that is unbound by emotional restraints, abstaining from standard morality to maintain
his power, yet decisive in action and free of hatred. Throughout the play, Hamlet, there are many decisions carried out by Hamlet and Fortinbras that
either reflects or diverts from the principles set forth by Machiavelli. However, when comparing and contrasting Hamlet and Fortinbras, you find that
Fortinbras conforms to Machiavelli's concepts more effectively while Hamlet fails to follow many of his principles. In Machiavelli's The Prince, he
stresses the importance of a prince learning how to imitate both the fox and the lion. Alone, neither the fox nor the lion, "can protect themselves from
the wolves, who gang up together". From this, Machiavelli argues the prince must make use of the nature of both beasts: having the ability to adapt to
any ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In his soliloquy, Hamlet said, "How all occasions do inform against me, And spur my dull revenge! What is a man? (32–33). Here, Hamlet realizes he
became too indecisive in his decisions, where in contrast, a fox would be wise and full of stratagems. He also fails at being a lion because he doesn't
allow himself to commit violence in his previous attempts, realizing that his lack of exhortation to act upon it. The line "Led by this army of such
mass and charge, Led by a delicate and tender Prince, whose spirit with divine ambition puff'd" (48–52) shows Hamlet's admiration for Fortinbras for
displaying the strength and power of a lion, who takes immediate action, commanding over an entire "army of such mass and charge" without doubt.
Fortinbras also displays cunningness of a fox when he sends a messenger to deceive Claudius into thinking he's now attack Poland instead of Denmark,
when he is just using Poland as a red herring to sneakily pull attack on

The Inconvenient Indian And Hamlet Analysis
"Fictions are less unruly than histories. The beginnings are more engaging, the characters more co–operative, the endings more in line with
expectations of morality and justice." (King xi–xii) Thomas King gives an unusual presentation of history, using storytelling techniques and humour to
keep readers engaged, while including his own series of arguments and conversations in his book. However, not only are the characters uncooperative,
the story also seems to be out of line with any expectation of morality and justice. His narrative shows that The Inconvenient Indian is definitely not
fictitious, but indeed a tragic history of the Natives. In this essay, I will accompany my reading of The Inconvenient Indian with Shakespeare's Hamlet.
The play touches on many aspects of memory that relate to King's representation of history. I will first talk about how King defines and utilizes the
subjective nature of history, then discuss matters about memory and finally the significance of history.
In his introduction, King defines history as "the stories we tell about the past" (King 2), "not chosen by chance" (King 3), and that "one of history's
jobs (is) to allocate credit" (King 2). For example, Columbus is credited for the discovery of America even though the Norse arrived much earlier,
simply because Columbus was a better story. (King 2) King puts forward the idea that history depends on the people writing it, and is therefore biased
to some extent. The end of Shakespeare's play

Fortinbras Vs Hamlet
Unlike Claudius and Hamlet, Fortinbras was both a thinker and Doer which let him complete his goal of taking over Denmark by being smart.The play
Hamlet say about thinking versus taking action is that it's best to have a combination of both Shakespeare's intention was to show that each side has it's
pros and cons but having both qualities could make you unstoppable like Fortinbras.
Hamlet makes excuses to not kill Claudius. Like when he could've killed him when he was praying.
"Now might I do it pat, now he is praying; And now I'll do't. And so he goes to heaven, And so am I reveng'd. That would be scann'd. A villain kills
my father; and for that, I, his sole son, do this same villain send To heaven." Act 3, Scene 3) He says he doesn't want... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
After one point when Laertes and Hamlet he try's to get Hamlet to drink the poison. Not a smart move on his part. "Stay, give me drink. Hamlet, this
pearl is thine; Here's to thy health. [Drum; trumpets sound; a piece goes off [within]. Give him the cup. Hamlet. I'll play this bout first; set it by
awhile. Come. [They play.] Another hit. What say you?" (Act 5, Scene 2)If he was thinking; That would've made it obvious if he drank the poison in
the cup. His mission was to poison him and not get caught. Won't be able to do that obviously in front of a crowd.
Laertes is a doer because after finding out he found out his father;Polonius, he was going to overthrow and kill the Claudius because he thought it was
him who did it. But in reality it wasn't.
"hey cry, "Choose we! Laertes shall be king!" Caps, hands, and tongues applaud it to the clouds: "Laertes shall be king, Laertes king!" How
cheerfully on the false trail they cry. O, this is counter, you false Danish dogs! The doors are broke." (Act 4, Scene 5) Laertes manage to get an
army of his own and took down the castle doors he was going to barge in and kill the King,but then realized he was mistaken. If he took more time and
thought it out he'd realize it wasn't him; it was Prince Hamlet.
But fortinbras he was a doer and thinker "For me, with sorrow I embrace my

Hamlet Fortinbras Redemption
In Hamlet William Shakespeare employs many difficult situations in the characters' lives to enlighten us on his view of important life lessons. The
play Hamlet teaches us of redemption and the struggle within us that comes with it, moral truths that the characters fight to find, and a just society
that mankind has always wanted. In Act I, redemption is shown as Fortinbras' mission to take back the lands lost by his father to the Old King in a
battle unfolds. Then we learn about his attempt at redeeming the honor lost to Norway by his actions against Poland in Act IV. He did end up not
fighting for the throne but found it in Act V but he was determined to take over fairly. Fortinbras spoke honorably ofHamlet as he states that it was with
"sorrow ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He can be interpreted as a cunning manipulator because he speaks to others with the intention of deceiving and fooling others into believing
everything he says. He comes across as a fool when he stumbles over his tongue saying things such as "And then, sir, does a this – a does – what was I
about to say?" This act hides that he is attempting to manipulate Laertes into going along with his schemes and even Ophelia from loving Hamlet.
Proof of this is made evident in his advice to Reynaldo wherein he states that words can bend and alter the truth if used in such a way. This shows that
Polonius is far more cunning than he comes off on the

Rhetorical Devices In Hamlet
Some say that the revenge of a patiently plotting man is to be feared more than the uncontrolled rage of a mad man. However, Hamlet does not fit
either category. He is neither a patient man who carefully plots out his revenge nor a madman that cannot control his actions. Hamlet is merely trapped
inside his convoluted mind. Before Hamlet's final declaration of revenge in Act IV, he was still in shock over the death of his father and the incredible
situation that he was placed in, having to kill King Claudius. Hamlet finally comes to terms with his mind and settles that he must exact revenge soon
or scrap his thoughts altogether. Shakespeare utilizes dramatic diction, vivid imagery, and specific syntax to describe the shift towards action in
Hamlet's state of mind. In the very first line Hamlet seems incredulous and even a bit out of his mind as he is surprised at himself that he still has not
exacted revenge on his father's murderer. He quickly changes to introspection as he uses dramatic diction to compare himself to an animal:
How all occasions do inform against me,
And spur my dull revenge! What is a man
If his chief good and market of his time
Be but to sleep and feed? A beast, no more.
Lee 2
The diction such as "dull" and "feed" seems to point out his rather lackluster characteristics up to this point. In an introspective moment of truth, Hamet
exposes his flaw in his inability to gather the mental strength to seek revenge. "Dull" is used to point out the fact that so

Fortinbras In Hamlet
Hamlet, written by William Shakespeare, is a classic tragedy in which personal weakness plays a large role in the fate of a central character. Hamlet's
personal weakness plays a predominant role in his eventual ending in Hamlet, however other factors also play a minor role in the outcome of the
character. For Hamlet, his hamartia (fatal flaw) is his procrastination in carrying out the task that the ghost set him. However, it is apparent that
although Hamlet's personal weakness plays a large part in his eventual fate, other factors beyond Hamlet play a role in his fate. In contrast, Claudius'
personal weaknesses are fully responsible for his fate in Hamlet. Claudius' desire for power is the weakness that eventually leads to his downfall, and ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Through the foil character of Fortinbras, the reader can see the inaction that Hamlet takes throughout the play. Hamlet's inaction allows Claudius to
realise that Hamlet knows the truth about the death of his father, and take measures to try to ensure that he will not reveal the truth. Had Hamlet
immediately avenged his father, his outcome may have been different. In contrast, Fortinbras takes action and does not procrastinate what he had set
out to achieve, and this action shows him actively benefiting from his actions, through the conquest of lands and eventually Denmark. Hamlet himself
even remarks on the contrast to himself in Act IV, scene IV in his soliloquy after encountering the army. "Witness this army of such mass and charge,
Led by a delicate and tender prince, whose spirit with divine ambition puffed." This shows that Hamlet recognises the contrast that Fortinbras is to
him, an idea that is made clearer as the scene continues. At the end of the play, Fortinbras arrives to see the tragic outcomes of many characters in the
play. His arrival allows him to be able to rule Denmark, unlike Hamlet, whose inaction results in his untimely death, and his outcome in the

Hamlet Lord Fortinbras
In William Shakespeare's tragedy, Hamlet, there is the overall theme of the impossibility of being certain. As Hamlet progresses, the main character,
Hamlet, sits upon his revenge plan to bring justice for his father's untimely murder by his uncle and is unable to come upon a justified conclusion for
most of the play. He switches his stance every so often and, only for the last scene does he decide his certainty with tragic results. And it's mostly
through the motif of unnaturalness, chaos, and war does this theme of never being certain develops. For example, the unnaturalness of hamlet's father's
ghost appearing every so often, issues on of the main uncertainties of whether it's actually hamlet's father of an evil entity. Although the ghost... Show
For example, how the overall conflict is how Hamlet is unable to come to a certain decision about killing Claudius as revenge for his father in
risking a chaotic shift of power and be open to possible war. However, there's a character of Lord Fortinbras, of whom faces similar predicaments
but, decides with certainty "exposing what is moral and unsure" (4.4.54). Lord Fortinbras is a foil for Hamlet, as everything Hamlet lacks, Fortinbras
makes up for. And for his admiration, Hamlet appreciates "the delicate and tender prince's" decision making abilities (4.4.51). However, there's the
questioning of that, although Fortinbras seem certain of his actions, is he making the right choices. As he drive several hundred men out to battle for a
mundane grass patch, many died for nothing. This creates the hint of Fortinbras not being everything he is described an admiration from Hamlet. Lord
Fortinbras brings unnecessary chaos and war because of his rash certainties while, it appears to the reader that Hamlet is wiser for thinking about it.
For, rather than headfirst into killing the king because a ghost told him so and risk plunging Denmark into a chaotic state, Hamlet thinks the most
reasonable way of proceeding. Furthermore, thinking more and more will only exemplify the true impossibility of being certain of any decision since
the consideration of benefits and

Fortinbras Influence On Hamlet
Shakespeare's tragic play Hamlet, is based on a young prince named Hamlet and his plot of revenge against his uncle Claudius, who killed Hamlets
father and former king of Denmark. Throughout the play Hamlet is hesitant about his actions until he sees Fortinbras leading his troops through
Denmark to Poland to battle over a worthless piece of land. Hamlet is inspired and partakes in a soliloquy in which he reflects on his inactions. The
character of Hamlet is impacted by Fortinbras actions, allowing the audience to further understand Hamlets state of mind and empathize the tragedy of
his fathers death and the wrongful acts committed by his mother. Firstly, Fortinbras fortitude causes Hamlet to envy Fortinbra and his troops for their
strength ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Here, Shakespeare illustrates how difficult it can be both mentally and emotionally on one's child when they are faced with struggles and difficult
decisions. We see this with Hamlet when he is confronted with the dilemma of defending his parents honour. " How stand I then, that have a father
killed, a mother stained, Excitements of my reason and my blood, And let all sleep." Hamlet openly admits his weakness, but is also a very
honourable prince. This effects the audience due to the fact that they can relate to both the emotional side of Hamlet and his struggle to revenge
death as well as understand the ethical reasons for his fight. Hamlet also expresses his sense of worthlessness as a human being, as it is very clear to
him just how hesitant he is to act. Hamlet feels like a coward for thinking to much; " of thinking to precisely on the event – A thought which, quartered
hath but one part wisdom And ever three part coward." This allows the audience to further understand Hamlet as a character. It is evident that Hamlet
has the willpower, motivation, ability and opportunity to do the task, yet still cannot. The audience can relate to this human weakness, as many of us
have moments in our lives where we are frozen to inaction, where our conscience plays between our emotions and our thoughts stopping us until the
moment has passes and we have done

Hamlet Fortinbras Foil
In addition to Horatio, Fortinbras, the Prince of Norway, also proved to be a character foil to Hamlet by possessing analogous situational characteristics
but distinctive responses to difficult situations. In correlation, both Hamlet and Fortinbras were princes of their respective countries, Denmark and
Norway, and both were subject to their respective father's deaths with Hamlet losing his father at the hands of Claudius and young Fortinbras having
"[the] valiant Hamlet...did slay [King] Fortinbras," his father, as said by Horatio (Shakespeare 1.1.96, 98). With the respective deaths though, Hamlet
and Fortinbras' reactions were exclusively disparate as Hamlet took a methodical, protracted approach by making sure Claudius was guilty by requesting
To start, King Claudius repeatedly generated specific plans, such as to have "in quick determination thus set it down: [Hamlet] shall with speed to
England" to which Claudius knew would be for Hamlet to be killed (Shakespeare 3.2.182–83). This scheme alongside his collaboration with Laertes to
devise a plot to kill Hamlet in Act IV, Scene VII, efficiently was akin to Hamlet's own premeditated plans to "have [the] players play something like
the murder of [his] father before [his] uncle," observe his uncle during the process, and have "the play [be] the thing wherein [he will] catch the
conscience of the King" (Shakespeare 2.2.623–25, 633–34). Furthermore, both Claudius and Hamlet, after murdering someone, pertaining to old King
Hamlet and Polonius, respectively, showed sparse grief or contrition as King Claudius stated "[his] crown, [his] own ambition, and [his] queen" all
resulted from murdering his brother and thus, was not willing to relinquish those perquisites (Shakespeare 3.3.59). In congruence, Hamlet did not show
much immediate regret or remorse after slaying Polonius as he declared Polonius a "wretched, rash, intruding fool" who was not where he should have
been (Shakespeare 3.4.38). Although Hamlet and Claudius

Hamlet and The Great Gatsby
No two human beings that have ever inhabited the earth were, are, or will ever be alike. Every individual possesses his or her own looks, qualities,
morals, personality, and much more. Comparing two characters from arguably, two of the greatest stories ever written, is quite a feat to accomplish.
One could already relate the two main protagonists of Hamlet and The Great Gatsby just by looking at the titles of the novels! Hamlet and Jay Gatsby
are two characters, who can easily be overanalyzed without truly researching into their own stories and unveiling just who these two gentlemen are,
for they are enigmas, and can be scrutinized into being more similar than one may think. Hamlet and The Great Gatsby each have stories within stories
within stories. Characters in both synopses are somehow related to one another. In Hamlet, when King Hamlet dies, Claudius "inherits" the throne,
because he gets married to Gertrude. He is not just another man involved with the royal court, but rather he is actually related, being King Hamlet's
brother. Another example is when young Fortinbras of Norway should just be considered another king of another nation in Europe and has no
relations to Denmark or any rulers, courts, or people in Hamlet. However, young Fortinbras must become involved with Denmark, because after all, it
was the late King Hamlet who killed his father, Fortinbras, and so naturally, he feels the need to revenge his father's death. In The Great Gatsby, the
narrator, Nick is

Hamlet Vs Fortinbras Essay
Unlike Claudius and Hamlet, Fortinbras was both a ruminator and Doer, which let him consummate his goal of surmounting Denmark by being keenly
intellective.The play Hamlet verbalizes about cerebrating versus taking action is that it's best to have a coalescence of both Shakespeare's intention
was to show that each side has it's pros and cons but having both qualities could make you unceasable like Fortinbras.
Hamlet makes excuses to not kill Claudius. Like when he could've killed him when he was praying.
"Now might I do it pat, now he is praying; And now I'll do't. And so he peregrinates to heaven, And so am I reveng'd. That would be scann'd. A
reprobate kills my father; and for that, I, his sole son, do this same reprobate send To heaven." ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
But in authenticity it wasn't.
"hey cry, "Choose we! Laertes shall be king!" Caps, hands, and tongues applaud it to the clouds: "Laertes shall be king, Laertes king!" How genially
on the mendacious trail they cry. O, this is counter, you erroneous Danish canines! The doors are impecunious." (Act 4, Scene 5) Laertes manage to
get an army of his own and took down the castle doors, he was going to barge in and kill the King,but then realized he was misconstrue. If he took
more time and thought it out he'd realize it wasn't him; it was Prince

Foils Of Fortinbras In Hamlet
Foiled by foils Hamlet was very influenced by others he was surrounded by. The affected his course of him doing things. Hamlet was affected a lot by
Fortinbras and his ways and wanted to be like him. His foils changed the way everything played out and unfolded. It made him do things he most likely
wouldn't do otherwise. Hamlet tried to be like certain people and try to beat certain people and it affected what he did with the decisions he made with
everything. In the play Hamlet Shakespeare uses Young Fortinbras, Laertes, and Claudius as foils for Hamlet in order to show Hamlet's flaws.
Fortinbras demonstrates in his actions or decision making that Hamlet can not make a decision. Hamlet realizes Fortinbras's ways and wants to be like
him.

Similarities Between Hamlet And Laertes
While Hamlet and Laertes are at conflicting ends of the scale, nonetheless, Prince Fortinbras is in the median. When King Hamlet executes Young
Fortinbras' father, his response was neither slowed nor thoughtless. In comparison to Hamlet's reluctance and Laertes' urgency, Fortinbras behaves
wisely. Rather than excessively pondering his situations or acting on desire, he evenly and determinedly fashions a functional plan to have that army
journey to Denmark. The Prince deceits the King by clarifying to Claudius that his army is purely marching through Denmark, and that he has no
desires of acting it. "Now, sir, youngFortinbras, of unimproved mettle hot and full, hath and full, hath in the skirts of Norway here and there sharked
up a list of

Similarities Between Hamlet And Prince Fortinbras
The King and the Prince Fortinbras are foil characters to the protagonist of the story Hamlet, and his father King Hamlet. In the story King Hamlet
is already dead, so he appears as a ghost or spirit. He appears as a ghost to tell his son that something is not right and it needs to be fixed as soon as
possible. This coming from a ghost is very sicking, so Hamlet listened to the dead King as well as his father. For the other characters above we do not
meet King Fortinbras in the play and only see Prince Fortinbras. very briefly in a scene. Prince Fortinbras enters briefly into the story as being the
winner of Denmark, this means that Hamlet's dynasty is dying and finally is meeting its maker. It is dead. The Prince Fortinbras father is dead

Hamlet Soliloquy Analysis
In William Shakespeare's Hamlet, Hamlet's soliloquies reveal his inner struggles and mind. Through structure, diction, and imagery, Hamlet's Act 2 and
Act 4 soliloquies illustrate his dramatic shift from passive and resentful to determined and violent. Hamlet Act 2 soliloquy serves to describe Hamlet's
thoughts about himself and his plan to label Claudius as guilty. The structure for the soliloquy is split into three general sections: praise for the actor,
spite at himself, and resolution in plan. By creating three distinct parts, readers can clearly observe Hamlet's retrogression and development. Amazed
by the player's act and left alone to himself, Hamlet immediately demeans himself; his first line even starts, "O, what a rogue and peasant slave am
I" (2.2.577). Although Hamlet has looked down upon himself before, this is the first time he considers himself as lowly as a slave. Describing
oneself as a slave implies that there is a master restricting their will; in Hamlet's case, his master is his father whose words might as well be God's.
Peasant also implies a lowly status, further strongly illustrating Hamlet's resentment at his weakness of not serving his father justice. Hamlet also
illustrates the effects of the player had he the same motive as Hamlet; he would "drown the stage in tears ... make mad the guilty and appall the free"
(2.2.598–591). Even though Hamlet overexaggerates the effects, the imagery clearly shows Hamlet's high praise for the player. Compared to his

Generational Themes In Hamlet

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Elizabeth Allen

More from Elizabeth Allen (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Generational Themes In Hamlet