1. Deals Done Right
(2.0)
Digiday Programmatic Summit
Chip Schenck
SVP, Data & Programmatic Solutions
Meredith Corporation
November, 2018
2. DO DON’T
• Share data
• Share deal points
• Share the "why" (why managed
tag, why cpm threshold)
• Push for transparent bid metrics
• Ask for guaranteed viewability
• Focus on price
• Expect top of stack placement and
exclusivity
• Assume header & managed tags are
the panacea
• Share auction insights
• Share auction data (win, close)
• Understand buyer needs
• Deliver product differentiation
• Change deal setup w/o client
alignment
• Overvalue your inventory
• Ignore strategic planners
• Focus on guarantees
Changing the Media Negotiation Dynamic
Listening to Each Other: BRITE
BUYERS
SELLERS
B/D
B+
A
F
C
B+
C
D
5. Resurgence in
Open Market
• Inventory more widely available due to
header bidding
• Quality controls due to industry
initiatives (Ads.txt, TrustX, adoption)
• First price pressure has driven people
back to OX-first strategy
6. • Higher in waterfall
• Price
• Quality Control
• Delivery
• Many:1
• OX Upgrade
Old World PMP
• Pre-bid access
• Inventory & product
differentiation
• 1:1
• Biddable guarantees
• ‘Direct’ replacement
New World PMP
The Role of PMP Has Changed
9. Deals Done Right for Programmatic
“The power sits
neither with the
buyer or the seller;
it rests in the
effectiveness of the
deal because both
parties are equally
responsible for
its success”
• Share auction
insights
• Don’t be blinded by
metrics
• Integrate buying
• Value beyond price
Buyer BehaviorSeller Behavior
• Share insights
• Focus on an
education-based sale
• Define the ‘so what’
• Influence planners
• Value beyond price
10. Deals Done Right 2.0
1 Differentiate your PMP
• Inventory, Products, Packaging
Don’t get used to higher prices
• First and second-price auction will each have
their purpose
• Develop a strategy for declining bid density
Create new levers for buyers
2
3
4
5
Share, Share, Share
• Information asymmetry has no place
Keep educating on tech
• From ad server to header bidding to…?
Integration of direct
and programmatic
• How does every plan use both?
6
Here three years ago and gave talk "Deals that Work"
Talked about publisher / buyer partnerships and the knowledge sharing that makes for good programmatic deals
Digiday asked me to return and give an updated state of the union...
This is “Deals that Work 2.0”!!
3 years ago
Some of these were a bit early (product diff), and some haven’t turned out the way we wanted (guaranteed viewability)
Sharing auction and performance data still a problem –Information asymmetry, apathy
Still falling short: transparent bid metrics, auction data sharing, product differentiation, tech understanding
B – DSP grade, D – Agency grade
We are both responsible for deal success – information asymmetry has no place in PMP
This was what we said was the foundation – all still true today
Industry moves fast
So what's happened in the past three years? Nothing, and everything!
Lebron James won the NBA Championship, we had an Olympics, and oh yes, an Election...
In our world, the first big change is the resurgence of the open market
Inventory more widely available due to header bidding
Quality controls due to industry initiatives (Ads.txt, TrustX, improved IAS)
As a side note: you may or may not agree with TrustX in terms of execution, but we as pubs need to make something like this work
If we can’t change buying behavior we need to do this
First price pressure has driven people back to open-first strategy
Only 3 years later… already talking about new world PMP
Then: earlier inventory access, use for quality control, many:1 set up (fail)
Now: less about waterfall, more about differentiated inventory, products
More 1:1 discussion even though agencies have tried to bring back the many:1 (93% of all PMP rev is 1:1)
A note on PG – why it has a place but people shouldn’t be counting on it the way it works now
Agencies more involved… not helping!
Agencies gravitated to this – buying for PROFIT not PERFORMANCE
Bringing their form of bulk-buying negotiation to the table
For many agencies, programmatic feels like it is still treated as secondary strategy
Need for SPO is strictly a result of header bidding and first-price auction
Drove significant BID DENSITY and COST increases
Early days, but seems to be a cost management technique, not performance enhancing
Hurt bid density but a natural progression and pubs need to be prepared – task my team every week
Changed seller behavior, now need to change Advertiser buying behavior – right now focused on worst parts of programmatic
Many sellers came from tech and ops – more focus on so what vs the features – why does X help?
Market share selling – tendency to use price – ‘value beyond price’
create more levers for buyers to pull, not just price
(auction prioritization, access, exclusivity, customization/packaging, etc)
Buyers: Metrics blindness – see high viewability, accept result (320x50 - )
OX is all about manipulation
RTB Pendulum: It was a buyers market (OX), then became a sellers’ market (PMP/HB) – now it just needs to be market
If want to make it better we need to focus on key changes
2nd price for performance (bid to value), 1st price for brand (bid to win)
It’s our continued responsibility to educate buyers - this should not be a hard sell – it is much more of a consultative sell based on educating the buyer
Economics over technology – 1st price will normalize, bid density will decline
Thank you – and look forward to seeing you in 2021 to grade our progress!