Induction Reasoning Essay On Induction Mills Inductive Reasoning Essay Inductive Bible Study Essay

1. Induction Reasoning
The problem of induction is based on induction reasoning which focuses on creating board
generalizations from specific observations. We make an observation, discover that there's a pattern
linked to the observation and then we build on a generalization/assumption on that observation.
The problem with induction reasoning is that many people rely on the perception that whatever
has happened in the past, will be resembled in the future; therefore since it has happened before, it
will happen again. For example, how do I know that the sun will rise tomorrow? My answer would
be based on my knowledge through induction: I know the sun will rise tomorrow, because it has
risen every day in the past. The reason why this is an unreliable source of thinking
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Essay On Induction
Induction
The problem and its solution
Introduction
In this paper the question "What are the possible solutions and alternatives for the problem of
induction?" will be answered. To answer this question, induction will be explained. After that the
problem of induction will be pointed out. Then possible solutions and alternatives will be discussed.
What is induction?
First of all: what is induction? Induction is a reasoning technique which is used to prove statements.
It uses general statements about observations, turned into premises, and uses these to form an
overall statement. There are three conditions which need to be followed for a proper proof by
induction. REFERENTIE INDUCTION
1)The number of observations must be large.
2)The observations should be repeated under a large amount of conditions
3)Not a single observation should be in conflict with the argument.
Induction uses two steps. The first one is to observe and make premises. The...show more content...
He does that by providing the theory that it actually is not a way to proof things, but to make
induction a way of creating a statement, which can be proven wrong by using conjecture and
criticism (Popper, 1963). Instead of looking for theories that are probably true, science should look
for theories that are probably false. Instead of finding justification, there should be looked for errors
in existing theories to correct (Popper, 1963).
According to Immanuel Kant our fundamental convictions about the natural world are derived from
twelve a priori –principles which he had classified into four categories: Quantity, Quality, Relation
and Modality. He believed that we have obtained these a priori–principles in the process of natural
selection. Because of these principles, we were able to judge induction quite accurate (Kant, 1781).
Even though this gives an explanation for our trust in the principle of induction, it does not give any
justification for our
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Mills Inductive Reasoning Essay
Mill's Inductive reasoning
Mill's method of agreement identifies a cause of an event in terms of its sufficient condition. When
using this method, one searches for a single factor that is common to multiple situations in which the
same event occurred.
Mill says that, when two or more occurrences of the event under investigation have only one
condition in common, then that condition is the cause of the event. (Mill, 2002)
More simply stated, Mill's method of agreement eliminates all but one common precursor. Mill's
method of agreement requires that in all cases where a consequence has occurred, the antecedent
condition must be present. This method isolates the supposed origin by listing all of the possible
factors that can be...show more content...
Method of Difference
According to Mill, if an occurrence in which the event being investigated occurs, and an instance in
which it does not occur, have every condition in common except one, then that one circumstance in
which alone the two instances differ is the effect, or the cause, or an indispensable part of the cause,
of the occurrence. The method of difference necessitates a comparison of at least one case in which
the occurrence appeared and at least one in which it did not, (Kemerling, 2001).
Simply stated, Mill's method of difference is the exclusion of all differences between the cases
being studied except one between instances in which the effect occurred and those in which it did
not. For example, in the case above: Suppose our four co–workers all ordered the same meal –
Hamburger, Fries and a Diet Pepsi. However, one decided to add a slice of cherry pie. It would be
reasonable for that one person to say, "I shouldn't have had the pie. It made me sick."
The pie may have been spoiled or perhaps the sickness was from over eating – we're not sure.
However, it would be reasonable to conclude that we have isolated the pie as a factor that caused
that one person's nausea, (Kemerling, 2001).
The major difference between the indirect method of difference and the method of agreement is that
the indirect method uses negative cases to strengthen conclusions drawn
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Inductive Bible Study Essay
dholloway3@liberty.edu
Douglas Holloway
Due by Monday at Midnight of the end of Module / Week #8
Name:Best Email Address:
BIBL 350 – Inductive Bible Study
Assignments for Submission #4
Assignment 19–4: Deuteronomy 22:8
"When you build a new house, make a parapet around your roof so that you may not bring the guilt
of bloodshed on your house if someone falls from the roof."
(1) Study the text and make as many observations as you can. List the observations in the space
provided. Be sure that you understand the meanings of all the words. Do background study and word
studies as needed to understand each term. (2) Identify both the historical–cultural context and the
literary context. Regarding the...show more content...
Gal. 5:13 sums up the principle of this Old Testament law perfectly: You' my brothers' were called
to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge the sinful nature; rather, serve one another in love."
G
(3d) Step #4: Cross into the New Testament:
(3e) Step #5: Grasping the Text in Our Town:
Christians today need to grow in love and to show that love through concern and service for the
well–being of others. We need to put the care and well–being of others above our care and concern
for ourselves. We need to love all people, not just the ones that are like us, or that are nice, or that
can help us get what we want. This love for people will reflect God's love for all people which He
made clear by His laws in the Old Testament and the sacrificial death of Christ for our sins in the
New Testament.
Assignment 20–1: Psalm 20
Based on the discussion of parallelism in the textbook, classify each of the couplets (verses) in
Psalm 20, printed below. That is, identify each set of parallel lines as synonymous,
developmental, illustrative, contrastive, or formal. Note that verse 5 and 6 each have three lines
instead of two. Either classify all three lines together as one category, or classify the first two as
one category and then relate the last line to the first two as a category. Verse 1 has been completed
as an example for you.

5. 1May
Get more content on HelpWriting.net