Probation and Punishment Due Week 10 and worth 250 points In preparation for this assignment, please view the Jurisville scenarios and resulting simulations from Weeks 8 through 10 in the Corrections unit. In the scenarios and resulting simulations, Robert Donovan, a Jurisville probation officer, discusses the intricacies of probation. Kris, the defendant, is offered an intensive supervised probation plan to follow. Brennan Brooke, a senior criminologist, discusses the tailoring of the inmate to the appropriate facility. Finally, Orlando Boyce, a sergeant at the fictional Deephall correctional facility, discusses measures that could conceivably make prison life effective and thus decrease the likelihood of recidivism. Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you: Outline your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for whom Robert is considering probation. State whether or not your results from the file review match Robert’s. Explain two (2) instances in which your views and those of Robert are both similar and different. Develop a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to participate in an intensive supervised probation program. The profile should contain at least three (3) attributes that you believe make this defendant the perfect candidate for this type of probation. Defend or critique the strategy of matching the inmate to the correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel and unusual punishment. Provide a rationale for your position with concrete examples. Defend or critique whether programs and amenities geared to making prison life effective—which run the gamut from hiring extra officers, to counseling and therapy, to building a garden—are time and taxpayer money well spent. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Outline the major characteristics and purposes of prisons, including prisoners’ rights and prison society. Use technology and information resources to research issues in criminal justice. Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric IF YOU CAN DO THIS ASSIGNMENT USING TH.

1. Probation and Punishment
Due Week 10 and worth 250 points
In preparation for this assignment, please view the Jurisville
scenarios and resulting simulations from Weeks 8 through 10 in
the Corrections unit.
In the scenarios and resulting simulations, Robert Donovan, a
Jurisville probation officer, discusses the intricacies of
probation. Kris, the defendant, is offered an intensive
supervised probation plan to follow. Brennan Brooke, a senior
criminologist, discusses the tailoring of the inmate to the
appropriate facility. Finally, Orlando Boyce, a sergeant at the
fictional Deephall correctional facility, discusses measures that
could conceivably make prison life effective and thus decrease
the likelihood of recidivism.
Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:
Outline your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for
whom Robert is considering probation. State whether or not
your results from the file review match Robert’s. Explain
two (2) instances in which your views and those of Robert are
both similar and different.
Develop a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to
participate in an intensive supervised probation program. The
profile should contain at least three (3) attributes that you
believe make this defendant the perfect candidate for this type
of probation.
Defend or critique the strategy of matching the inmate to the
correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel
and unusual punishment. Provide a rationale for your position
with concrete examples.
Defend or critique whether programs and amenities geared to
making prison life

2. effective—which
run the gamut from hiring extra
officers,
to counseling and therapy, to building a
garden—are
time and taxpayer money well spent.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment.
Note:
Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality
resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size
12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references
must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your
professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the
student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title,
and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not
included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this
assignment are:
Outline the major characteristics and purposes of prisons,
including prisoners’ rights and prison society.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in
criminal justice.
Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice using proper
writing mechanics and APA style conventions.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality,
logic / organization
of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the
following rubric

3. IF YOU CAN DO THIS ASSIGNMENT USING THE
GUIDELINES AS SHOW ABOVE AND FOLLOWING THE
GUIDELINES FROM THE EXEMPLARY COLUMN FROM
THE RUBRIC BELOW. IF NOT I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO
USE
YOU..
Points: 250
Assignment 3:
Probation and Punishment
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Outline your findings from your review of the file of Kris,
for whom Robert is considering probation. State whether or not
your results from the file review match Robert’s. Explain
two (2) instances in which your views and those of Robert are
both similar and different.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely
outline your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for
whom Robert is considering probation.

4. Did not submit or incompletely s
tate whether or not your results from the file review match
Robert’s.
Did not submit or incompletely e
xplain two (2) instances in which your views and those of
Robert are both similar and different.
Insufficiently
outlined your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for
whom Robert is considering probation. Insufficiently stated
whether or not your results from the file review match
Robert’s. Insufficiently explained two (2) instances in which
your views and those of Robert are both similar and different.
Partially
outlined your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for
whom Robert is considering probation.
Partially
stated whether or not your results from the file review match
Robert’s.
Partially
explained two (2) instances in which your views and those of
Robert are both similar and different.
Satisfactorily
outlined your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for
whom Robert is considering probation.
Satisfactorily
stated whether or not your results from the file review match
Robert’s.
Satisfactorily
explained two (2) instances in which your views and those of
Robert are both similar and different.
Thoroughly
outlined your findings from your review of the file of Kris, for
whom Robert is considering probation.
Thoroughly
stated whether or not your results from the file review match
Robert’s.

5. Thoroughly
explained two (2) instances in which your views and those of
Robert are both similar and different.
2.
Develop a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to
participate in an intensive supervised probation program. The
profile should contain at least three (3) attributes that you
believe make this defendant the perfect candidate for this type
of probation.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely
developed a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to
participate in an intensive supervised probation program.
Insufficiently
developed a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to
participate in an intensive supervised probation program.
Partially
developed a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to
participate in an intensive supervised probation program.
Satisfactorily
developed a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to
participate in an intensive supervised probation program.
Thoroughly
developed a profile of the so-called perfect candidate to
participate in an intensive supervised probation program.
3.
Defend or critique the strategy of matching the inmate to the
correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel
and unusual punishment. Provide a rationale for your position
with concrete examples.

6. Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely
defended or critiqued the strategy of matching the inmate to the
correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel
and unusual punishment.
Did not submit or incompletely
provided a rationale for your position with concrete examples.
Insufficiently
defended or critiqued the strategy of matching the inmate to the
correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel
and unusual punishment.
Insufficiently
provided a rationale for your position with concrete examples.
Partially
defended or critiqued the strategy of matching the inmate to the
correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel
and unusual punishment.
Partially
provided a rationale for your position with concrete examples.
Satisfactorily
defended or critiqued the strategy of matching the inmate to the
correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel
and unusual punishment.
Satisfactorily
provided a rationale for your position with concrete examples.
Thoroughly
defended or critiqued the strategy of matching the inmate to the
correctional facility as a response to the legal concept of cruel
and unusual punishment.
Thoroughly
provided a rationale for your position with concrete examples.
4. Defend or critique whether programs and amenities geared to
making prison life effective—which run the gamut from hiring
extra officers, to counseling and therapy, to building a
garden—are time and taxpayer money well spent.
Weight: 25%

7. Did not submit or incompletely defended or critiqued whether
programs and amenities geared to making prison life
effective—which run the gamut from hiring extra officers, to
counseling and therapy, to building a garden—are time and
taxpayer money well spent.
Insufficiently defended or critiqued whether programs and
amenities geared to making prison life effective—which run
the gamut from hiring extra officers, to counseling and therapy,
to building a garden—are time and tax-payer money well
spent.
Partially defended or critiqued whether programs and amenities
geared to making prison life effective—which run the gamut
from hiring extra officers, to counseling and therapy, to
building a garden—are time and tax-payer money well spent.
Satisfactorily defended or critiqued whether programs and
amenities geared to making prison life effective—which run
the gamut from hiring extra officers, to counseling and therapy,
to building a garden—are time and tax-payer money well
spent.
Thoroughly defended or critiqued whether programs and
amenities geared to making prison life effective—which run
the gamut from hiring extra officers, to counseling and therapy,
to building a garden—are time and tax-payer money well
spent.
5. 3 references
Weight: 5%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; all references
poor quality choices.
Does not meet the required number of references; some
references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality
choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high
quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

8. Weight: 10%
More than 8 errors present
7-8 errors present
5-6 errors present
3-4 errors present
0-2 errors present
.