Topic Any U.S. government issue (State issue is better than Feder.docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•5 views

This document provides guidelines for a 2500 word paper on a debatable U.S. state or federal government issue. The paper must include a historical background on how the issue and related laws have changed over time, discuss the issue in relation to the U.S. Constitution citing evidence from amendments or other sources, and provide scholarly and topical sources to support a hypothesis while also including counterarguments. An outline is suggested beginning with an introduction of the topic, a research question, a thesis statement as the hypothesis, more background details, a pro-con debate over the thesis, and a conclusion weighing the pros against the cons.

Education

Topic
: Any U.S. government issue (State issue is better than Federal)
MUST be DEBATABLE. For example: same-sex marriage law
in California.
Length: 2500
Paper must include:
- historical background of the issue; how it (&laws in its'
regard) changed over time.
- MUST HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL EVIDENCE/DISCUSSION
(use it as a source and cite it) supporting your position (e.g.
Amendments/ articles of confederation etc.)
- scholarly + topical sources (no minimum)
- give your hypothesis & include counterarguments
General Outline
Describe a situation
: Briefly, in a paragraph or two introduce your topic.
Pose a research question
: One that lends itself to debate
Hypothesis
: This is your thesis statement or, hypothetical question answer
Background
: Go into more detail here on your topic and relevant
considerations
Pro-Con Debate
: Over the thesis statement
Conclusion
: Weighing the pros against the cons

Topic Any U.S. government issue (State issue is better than Feder.docx

By now, you should have a firm grasp of the existing conversation on your topic after having surveyed the field on your topic so as to narrow the who, what, where, when, and why/how, so that you can fully formulate your own ideas and develop an original complex claim with which to place yourself in the scholarly conversation on your topic. Evaluating your working claim As you draft your working claim, evaluate its efficacy. A strong claim will be: • Contestable: Intentionally writing a claim that someone can disagree with may seem counterintuitive, but consider that if no one could possibly disagree with what you’re arguing, there’s little point in writing about it. Being able to acknowledge and refute counterarguments will strengthen your claim, not weaken it. o POOR: “Durham and Chapel Hill have much in common, although they are different in some ways.” Well, yeah, but who cares? o BETTER: “Although Durham’s industrial past has created a more deeply troubled economic caste system than found in Chapel Hill, it has also created greater cultural diversity that is now helping to guide the city’s economic renewal.” There is certainly room for disagreement in this claim; as a result, it provides a much more interesting basis for discussion. The author is likely to support it more passionately than the first claim. • Reasonable: While you want your claim to be contestable, you also want it to be reasonable. A claim can be radical, in the context of current dialogue on your topic, and still be reasonable if you have sufficient evidence to support it. Readers will recognize the difference between thoughtful, critical interpretations of evidence and contortions that twist evidence around to support an unreasonable claim. • Specific: Broad claims are more difficult to support effectively than focused claims. Specific claims also tend to provide readers with more useful information than broad claims. o POOR: “North Carolina apple farmers are responding to the current economic situation by finding new ways to generate income.” o BETTER: “With hurricanes causing significant crop losses over the past decade, North Carolina apple farmers are increasingly relying on agrotourism to generate reliable supplemental income.” • Significant: Consider the context of the course for which you are writing your paper. Is your claim adding anything meaningful to the current dialogue surrounding your topic? Note that as you become more familiar with the concerns of a given topic or discipline, you will be able to contribute more significantly to the discussion. • Interpretive: Does your claim offer an interpretation of evidence or does it simply describe a situation? If it describes a situation it is a claim of fact. o POOR: “The United States is a federal system that divides governmental powers between national and state authorities.” Rather than offering an interpretation, this sentence describes an incontestable fact. While it may have truth value, it makes a poor th.

Turning Research Topic into an Argument

Dilip Barad

This document provides guidance on developing a research topic, turning it into an argument, and writing a first draft of a research proposal. It recommends starting with a topic of interest and researching key studies, approaches, issues, and potential gaps in the field. A topic should then be narrowed and questions or problems formulated to give it direction for an argument. Research involves using evidence to prove or establish an argument, not just gathering information. Examples of argument types are given. A research proposal should state the argument, list primary and secondary sources, propose a chapter structure, and include a provisional conclusion and bibliography.

English 1130Paper #4 – 2 PartsPart 1 -- Researched Argument.docx

SALU18

English 1130 Paper #4 – 2 Parts Part 1 -- Researched Argument Part 2 – Visual Essay Part I For Paper #4 you will write a researched argument essay that addresses an issue related to the U.S. Judicial and/or prison system. Think about the documentary films we’ve watched (Into the Abyss, Lost for Life, The Farm), about any direct or indirect experiences you may have had, any discussions you may have engaged in (in personal as well as academic settings), any material you may have read (in and out of school). Decide on a topic that interests you, and devise a corresponding issue. The issue should be sufficiently complex – something debatable. Your paper shall be 10 pages, typed, double-spaced. It shall include proper source citations (in-text citations, work cited page). Follow these steps as you construct your paper:  Read what experts have already said about the issue.  Examine the various dimensions of the issue by analyzing and evaluating the experts’ arguments to determine which are the most convincing, which are reasonable but not terribly convincing, and which are flawed.  Articulate a thesis expressing your own position.  Discover solid reasons to support your thesis.  Return to the sources (research) to extract evidence you will use to back up each of your reasons. Ways to support your reasons:  Examples --  Based on a similarity to something that happened in the past.  Based on a similar case.  Based on a hypothetical situation.  Relevant Information –  Facts  Statistics  Points of interest  Statements, testimony, or other relevant information from acknowledged authorities.  Personal experience (be sure the experience relates directly to the reason you are developing).  Summarize alternative views and reasonable objections to your argument.  Respond tactfully to these alternative views.  Structure your essay (for this essay, I ask that you follow the following structure):  Introductory Section  Opener – Introduce the issue and invite your readers into the conversation.  Explanation and background – Familiarize your readers with the controversy. Give them the information they need to understand the issue at hand and make sense of the conversation.  Thesis – Give your stand on the issue – your main claim.  Body of the Essay  Alternative view on one aspect of the controversy  Your refutation of this view  Reason + evidence for your thesis  Alternative view on another aspect of the controversy  Your refutation of this view  Reason + evidence for your thesis *(This pattern continues until you have covered all the aspects of the issue you have chosen to focus on.)  Conclusion  Recap of the argument  Final statement of argument/final assessment of main issue and claim Part II Visual Essay – Select 5 images ...

Raising Minimum An explanation of the its.docx

bkbk37

This document discusses the key components of an essay arguing for or against raising the minimum wage. The essay would provide an explanation of the controversy around raising the minimum wage, including the background and current state of the issue. It would articulate a clear position and support that position with reasons backed by evidence from research. The essay would also have to address counterarguments and refute them with detailed rebuttals. It would conclude by restating the main argument and possibly suggesting a solution or policy. Sources would need to be cited in MLA style and include at least 5 non-internet sources.

In at least 250 words reflect on your proposed amendment to the U.S..docx

mecklenburgstrelitzh

In at least 250 words reflect on your proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that you presented to your peers in the discussion board.. This assignment is about creating and communicating a fully developed argument. First, describe your proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (this is a thesis statement) Second, present and describe three (3) arguments in support of your Amendment. Think especially about the ideas, themes, and nature of our nation’s founding and political institutions. For example, do our founders ideas of what liberty means support you proposed amendment? Third, address at least two 2 counter arguments that could be made by those that might oppose your proposed amendment. Describe those counter arguments fully and discuss why those counter arguments do not sufficiently counter your proposed amendment to the Constitution. Finally, write a conclusion paragraph that restates your proposed change to the Constitution and reviews what you believe to be the most compelling argument in support of your proposed amendment. Be sure to include a reference list for any outside sources you use in completing your paper. Please note: APA formatting and citations rules apply to this and all essays in this course. .

IReflection on Your Proposed Amendment to the ConstitutionIn at .docx

BHANU281672

I Reflection on Your Proposed Amendment to the Constitution In at least 250 words reflect on your proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that you presented to your peers in the discussion board.. This assignment is about creating and communicating a fully developed argument. First, describe your proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (this is a thesis statement) Second, present and describe three (3) arguments in support of your Amendment. Think especially about the ideas, themes, and nature of our nation’s founding and political institutions. For example, do our founders ideas of what liberty means support you proposed amendment? Third, address at least two 2 counter arguments that could be made by those that might oppose your proposed amendment. Describe those counter arguments fully and discuss why those counter arguments do not sufficiently counter your proposed amendment to the Constitution. Finally, write a conclusion paragraph that restates your proposed change to the Constitution and reviews what you believe to be the most compelling argument in support of your proposed amendment. Be sure to include a reference list for any outside sources you use in completing your paper. Please note: APA formatting and citations rules apply to this and all essays in this course. As with all weekly written assignments, submit your work as an attached file. Double-space your paper and use 12 point Times New Roman as your font. ...

English 1130Paper #4 – 2 PartsPart 1 -- Researched ArgumentP.docx

SALU18

AJ 107 Concepts of Criminal Law Research Paper Instructio.docx

daniahendric

AJ 107: Concepts of Criminal Law Research Paper Instructions What is a research paper? A research paper is one in which you have identified a topic, have researched what others have written about that topic, and (at the end of your paper) have taken a position of your own about elements of the topic. All research papers should have a thesis (more on this later), which becomes the starting point for your research. You support your thesis by presenting referenced information from reliable sources, such as books, periodicals, journals, newspapers, on-line databases, academic/scholarly web sites, etc. Important Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable research source. Ever. All referenced material, whether paraphrased (put in your own words) or quoted, must be cited properly in MLA format. All research papers must contain proper MLA in-text citation as well as a Works Cited page. This is a standard college-level writing requirement. There are writing resources available to you in our “Research Paper Instructions and Resources” Module. For additional help on writing your research papers, please visit the SBCC Writing Center located in the Cartwright Learning Resources Center. This is the building on the West Campus closest to the footbridge. Walk into the building and enter the CLRC to the left. The library is to the right. Hours: Mon. – Thur.: 9 a.m. – 7 p.m. and Fri.: 9 a.m. – 3 p.m. You can also access a lot of helpful materials by going to their website at: http://www.sbcc.edu/clrc/writing_center/index.php AJ 107: Concepts of Criminal Law Research Paper TOPIC Instructions Choose a topic that interests and challenges you. Your attitude towards the topic often determines the amount of effort and enthusiasm you put into your research. If you are uncertain as to what is expected of you in completing your research paper assignments, re-read your assignment sheets carefully or ask me. That’s what I'm here for! Select a subject you can manage. Avoid topics that have only a narrow range of source materials. Your topic is to be an in-depth legal analysis of a law that has been discussed in lectures or in your textbook. Specifically, you will critically analyze the various legal rulings and interpretations surrounding your law. You need to develop a thesis statement based upon your topic. The thesis statement summarizes the main point of your paper and is often phrased as a question that you then answer through your research. The thesis is normally found at the end of the paper's introductory paragraph(s). It is usually a single sentence and acts as a guide to let your audience know the central idea of your research and to know what to expect in the body of your paper. Your thesis statement should be specific—it should cover only what you will discuss in your paper and should be supported with specific evidence. Thesis Statement Example: Ho ...

This week’s written assignment is important preparation for the Final Paper. You will construct an outline of your Final Paper that will ensure you have all of the required elements. You are expected to write an outline, not a draft of your final paper. Drafts of your paper will NOT meet the requirements of this assignment . Prepare : Please review the necessary course text chapters, articles, and multimedia. Conduct additional research necessary to complete the assignment. Reflect : The end of the course is rapidly approaching, and now is a great time to begin working on your Final Research Paper. This assignment will give you an opportunity to create a detailed outline of your paper, which will help you to establish a structure for your final paper. Your outline will be reviewed by your instructor and the feedback provided will certainly help you create a better final product. Remember, the main point of your outline is to help you organize your thoughts and research. The outline should serve as the backbone of your paper and should provide the building blocks for your Final Research Paper. Write : Make sure to read over the instructions for the Final Research Paper, which are located in Week Five of your online course or in the Course Components section of this course guide. As explained in those instructions, your paper should have seven major sections. For this assignment, you will need to create an outline in a Word document. Review the Sample Outline (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. from the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. . Your outline must include the following: Title page (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. in APA format Introduction and Thesis Introduce (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. the main topic and provide a brief preview of main points. Include a thesis statement (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. that identifies how the concepts of federalism, civil liberties, and civil rights are implicated and affected by your selected topic. Main Point 1: Identify implications for federalism related to the topic. Provide a topic sentence that describes one positive impact of federalism on the selected topic. Provide a topic sentence that describes one negative impact of federalism on the selected topic. Provide at least one piece of supporting evidence (a quote or paraphrase) that supports all of your claims concerning the impacts of federalism on the selected topic. Be sure to provide an in-text citation. (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. In a single sentence, explain the meaning of the evidence you added above. So what? Add a sentence that tells your reader how this evidence supports your topic sentence. Why is this evidence important to share? Main Point 2: Identify implications for civil rights related to the topic. Provide a topic sentence that describes one ...

Researched Argument Essay OutlineYour Researched Argument Es.docx

brittneyj3

Researched Argument Essay Outline Your Researched Argument Essay is an argument. You are not just presenting your findings; rather, you are choosing an argument based on your findings, and you are using your findings to prove that your claim is true and that a solution/resolution is warranted. Introduction I. Intro to Topic: Grab your reader’s attention with an interesting fact, analogy, or anecdote. Background Information on topic: A. Set up the issue, provide the background and what this essay will show, cover, or prove for your audience. B. Reference the Stimulus Packet article that inspired your question and explain how it did so. C. What is the larger context of this issue? Why is it important (this is where you can use journalistic articles)? Thesis: Thesis statement in one single sentence. Clearly identify what your essay will argue. Body Section ONE (change the heading to match your topic) Heading: for example: “Age Restrictions: The Health Implications of Being Too Young” I. Context: 1-2 sentences of context if necessary (include sources citation if necessary). Topic Sentence/Claim: first main point topic sentence/claim ( main points/claims are never questions, quotes, or information that requires a source citation - remember to focus on what this whole section is showing or proving): A - First perspective’s assertion (claim - 1 sentence). E - Use evidence to prove the claim (include appositive, quoted material, and in-text citation). C - Provide commentary that explains, expands on, and/or connects the quoted information to the issue. If you have a second claim that falls under the same perspective, include it in the A - E - C format in the same paragraph (copy and paste). A - Second perspective’s assertion (claim - 1 sentence). E - Use evidence to prove the claim (include appositive, quoted material, and in-text citation). C - Provide commentary that explains, expands on, and/or connects the quoted information to the issue to the first perspective . A - Opposing/Different perspective’s assertion (claim - 1 sentence). E - Use evidence to prove the claim (include appositive, quoted material, and in-text citation). C - Provide commentary that explains, expands on, and/or connects the quoted information to the issue to the first and/or second perspective. Use this commentary to disprove or devalue this perspective in light of the first to you’ve presented . Summarize and re-assert your initial claim with info discussed above (1-2 sentences max). Section TWO (change the heading to match your topic) Heading: for example: “Age Restrictions: The Health Implications of Being Too Young” I. Context: 1-2 sentences of context if necessary (include sources citation if necessary). Topic Sentence/Claim: second main point topic sentence/claim ( main points/claims are never questions, quotes, or information that requires a source ci.

Checklist Do not use a standard essay format. Provide each co.docx

spoonerneddy

Checklist : Do not use a standard essay format. Provide each component clearly and distinctly. Two paragraphs comparing two selected documents. One thesis statement One discussion question WORD LIMIT 300-400. Content Expectations: Step ONE: Identify the nature of the source material. Which readings are primary or secondary sources? Are they fictional works or do they present any evident bias? Step TWO: Choose TWO READINGS from the assigned documents to perform a compare/contrast analysis. Video material is not acceptable in this assignment. If you choose a primary and a secondary source, then think about how the primary source fits into the narrative/position of the secondary source. If you choose two primary sources, then compare how they represent different viewpoints or perspectives on important issues. If there is only one assigned reading, then extract two meaningful examples instead of comparisons. Step THREE: Draw TWO meaningful comparisons between the two documents that reveals important insight into the historical period/topic of the week. The comparison may be any similarity or difference, but should focus on explaining how it helps historians understand the past. Think about how and why things happened the way they did. Figure out what you think is the most significant SIMILARITY between the two passages. Consider the author's perspective (national origin, class, ideology etc) for each document. STEP FOUR: If these documents were the source material for your research project, what would your preliminary research question or thesis statement be? This should be no more than two sentences and cover the main idea that you would try to argue. Ex. Using the works of Robespierre and St. Just, this paper will argue that the violence of the French Revolution was created by their interpretation of the needs of the French nation rather than their philosophical beliefs. Be ambitious but with limits. Lay out a provable case that makes a strong a point, regardless of whether you are fully convinced that it is the case. You will be evaluated on the composition and effect of the ideas rather than the perfectness of the answer. Step FIVE: Create one discussion question that you can propose to the class during seminar. It should be a ‘why’ problem that poses an issue for debate rather than demanding a specific factual answer. Ex. ‘Why didn’t Frankenstein name the Creature?” instead of “Did Frankenstein name the Creature?” Do NOT use quotations or paraphrase the document. You may refer to specific passages but do not summarize the document. “ex. Where Thomas Paine talked about hereditary right, he was focused on the legitimacy of an absolute monarchy.” The paper should consist entirely of your own ideas and opinions about the sources using a compare/contrast approach. Therefore, citations should never be required. If you do quote/paraphrase then include citations. READINGS- CHOOSE ONLY 2. Avalon Proj.

Lesson 3: Refining Your Topic

bsimoneaux

This document discusses refining topics for argumentative papers. It explains that argumentative topics require taking a stand through a claim that can be proven logically. Some types of claims are listed, such as claims of fact, cause and effect, values, and solutions/policies. General topics are given as examples, like global warming, and tentative thesis statements are developed that take a position within one of the claim types. Students are instructed to discuss their general topics and possible thesis claims with classmates to help refine their topics.

35806 Topic AbortionNumber of Pages 5 (Double Spaced)Num.docx

rhetttrevannion

35806 Topic: Abortion Number of Pages: 5 (Double Spaced) Number of sources: 3 Writing Style: APA Type of document: Essay Academic Level:Undergraduate Category: Philosophy Language Style: English (U.S.) Order Instructions: Week 5 - Final Paper Ethical Reasoning [WLO: 3] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4] Please read these assignment instructions before writing your paper as they contain very precise and specific instructions on both the content and format requirements. You should download the provided outlinePreview the document and use that to structure your paper, and consult the assignment guidancePreview the document and modeled examplePreview the document for additional help. Finally, before submitting your assignment please use the checklistPreview the document to ensure that you have completed all of the requirements. Overview This course has three written assignments that build upon one another and are designed to take you step-by-step through a process of writing a paper that identifies an ethical question, examines the context, issues, and arguments surrounding the question, and attempts to defend an answer to that question using strong moral reasoning. In the Week 1 assignment, “Ethical Question,” you chose an ethical question, provided an introduction, a position statement and supporting reason, and an opposing position statement and supporting reason. In the Week 3 assignment, “Applying an Ethical Theory,” you explained utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics, including its core moral principle or ideal, and applied that theory to the topic by demonstrating how its principles would support a particular position on your ethical question. In this final written assignment, you will combine what you have done in these two exercises by examining an ethical issue and defending your own position on an ethical question regarding that issue. This final written assignment should be written in essay form with the following clearly labeled sections: Introduction Ethical Argument Explanation and Defense Objection and Response Conclusion The paper should be between 1,300 and 1,500 words, utilize three scholarly resources, and include a title page and reference page. Part 1: Introduction In this section of the paper, you will begin with your ethical question, introduce the topic and paper, and close with a thesis statement. The ethical question may be the same as your Week 3 written assignment (“Applying an Ethical Theory”) or a revised version of it. The introduction should be revised in a way that reflects your additional thinking on the issue and question. End this section with a thesis statement that states your position on the issue (the answer to the ethical question you believe is strongest) and provides a brief summary of the main ideas you will be presenting in the paper. Please see the assignment guidance for examples of thesis statements. Place the introduction under the Part 1: Introduction heading. Part 2: E.

Lesson 5: Thesis Statements

bsimoneaux

This document provides guidance on writing effective thesis statements for argumentative essays. It defines a thesis statement as a writer's reasoned conclusion about an issue or writing problem that will be proved through logical analysis and argumentation. The document discusses different types of claims that can be made in a thesis statement, including claims of fact, cause and effect, value, and solutions/policies. It provides examples of strong and weak thesis statements and analyzes their strengths and weaknesses. The key objectives are to understand how to write an analytical thesis statement and to develop a draft thesis statement for one's own essay.

Reflection on Your Proposed Amendment to the ConstitutionIn at l

felipaser7p

Reflection on Your Proposed Amendment to the Constitution In at least 250 words choose an amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This assignment is about creating and communicating a fully developed argument. 1. First, describe your proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (this is a thesis statement) 2. Second, present and describe three (3) arguments in support of your Amendment. Think especially about the ideas, themes, and nature of our nation’s founding and political institutions. For example, do our founders ideas of what liberty means support you proposed amendment? 3. Third, address at least two 2 counter arguments that could be made by those that might oppose your proposed amendment. Describe those counter arguments fully and discuss why those counter arguments do not sufficiently counter your proposed amendment to the Constitution. 4. Finally, write a conclusion paragraph that restates your proposed change to the Constitution and reviews what you believe to be the most compelling argument in support of your proposed amendment. Be sure to include a reference list for any outside sources you use in completing your paper. Please note: APA formatting and citations rules apply to this and all essays in this course. View your assignment rubric. ...

Part one!Propose an amendment to the U.S. Constitution.Be sure t.docx

dunnramage

This document outlines an assignment to propose an amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Students are asked to argue for their proposed amendment in 75-150 words, explaining how it would benefit Americans and why it requires a constitutional change rather than a law. They then must reflect on their proposed amendment in 250+ words, restating their proposal, presenting three arguments in support and addressing two counterarguments against it, and concluding by reemphasizing the most compelling pro argument.

Paper Format Approximately 1,500 words, typed, double-spaced,.docx

herbertwilson5999

Paper Format: Approximately 1,500 words, typed, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, twelve-point font Prompt: Read and analyze the primary secondary documents on the U.S. Civil Rights Movement discussed in this course. Your thesis should address the following two questions: What were the goals of the civil rights movement that developed in the 1950s and 1960s and why did this black freedom struggle assume the characteristics that it did? Your essay should analyze primary documents on the injustices the movement sought to redress, including the diverse motivations that inspired individual participation & interpret the strategies that guided organized activism. You should also consider the interpretation posited in the secondary source, At the Dark End of the Street, in your analysis of the primary documents of the civil rights movement. Your essay should answer these questions by providing a detailed presentation of primary & secondary evidence in support of your thesis. Your thesis should be focused on the question identified in BOLD print above. Conventions of Historical Writing: The following components are essential to a historical essay: 1) An introductory paragraph that establishes the scope of the argument – including the specific time period, geographic area, & demographics of the group of people you’ll discuss. 2) A thesis statement (located at the end of the introduction) in which you establish a specific position that you will defend in the body of your essay. 3) A detailed presentation of evidence to support your thesis derived from both lecture & course readings, with particular emphasis on primary documents. Each paragraph should begin with a topic sentence that advances your argument and is supported, in the body of the paragraph, by at least one primary source. 4) A concluding paragraph that restates your argument and explains its significance. No bibliography is needed. However, please cite readings in the body of your paper by indicating the editor or author’s name and page number in the following format: (Taylor, 65). Please proofread your paper before submitting it. Papers will be checked for plagiarism. So PLEASE do not use sources from outside the course readings. Thesis (and Introduction) 20 pts Analysis of primary source evidence on goals of civil rights movement 35 pts Analysis of primary source evidence on characteristics of civil rights movement 35 pts Organization, clarity, writing conventions 10 pts Total Points: 100 EX 1. Thesis: Although Washington and DuBois shared the goal of social equality between African Americans and whites, Washington’s ideas were better suited for the conditions of the time. vs. Although both men envisioned eventual equality, Washington’s ideas were safer, and therefore better responses to the discriminatory legislation and violence against African Americans after the Reconstruction era. or Although both men envisioned event.

Types of Legal Writing in Legal English modern

yara122605

Transmission of Genetic MaterialComplete the discussions on the fo.docx

Topic Any U.S. government issue (State issue is better than Feder.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Topic Any U.S. government issue (State issue is better than Feder.docx

Similar to Topic Any U.S. government issue (State issue is better than Feder.docx (10)

More from depoerossie

More from depoerossie (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Topic Any U.S. government issue (State issue is better than Feder.docx