2. Representation of a Dye Sensitized Solar Cell
-LUMO potential of the dye
must be more negative than
the potential of the TiO2
Conduction Band edge (-0.5
V).
-HOMO potential of the dye
must be more positive than
Redox potential of electrolyte
for efficient dye regeneration.
3. Important electron processes in a DSSC
Regeneration and Recombination kinetics
(2) 100 fs to 100 ps
(3) μs range
(5) μs to ms range
(6) ms to s
(7) ns
5. Open-circuit Voltage (Voc)
- Increasing the redox potential of the electrolyte
increases Voc and reduces overpotential losses.
6. Important Requirements for New
Electrolytes
Positive redox potential to maximize/optimize Voc (1.2 V), yet allowing
enough driving force to regenerate photo-oxidized dye (0.18 V-0.4 V vs.
NHE).
Slow recombination kinetics (5) and (6).
Negligible light absorption in the visible region.
Alternative Redox Mediators
Co(II/III)(bpy)3, 0.535 V Co(II/III)(bpy-pz)2, 0.86 V Fc/Fc+, 0.62 V
• Fast recombination
kinetics, poor dye
regeneration
• Not optimal with Pt-
coated counter electrode
• Very fast
recombination kinetics
7. Proposed Research
Hypothesis: Synthesis of low spin Fe(II/III) iron
complexes, with a fast self-exchange electron rate,
and a large redox potential, as alternative redox
mediators in DSSCs with a high Voc.
1. ([Fe(bphen)3]2+/3+)
2. ([Fe(phen)3]2+/3+)
R=Me, Ph, OR2
1. 2.
8. Motivations
Potential reversibility between the Fe2+/3+ species and
possibility to tune the redox potential through ligand
modifications.
Larger self-exchange electron rate than cobalt analogs due to
smaller reorganizational energy going from presumably low
spin d6 to low spin d5 electron configuration. Dye regeneration.
Bulky electron donating groups can function as insulating
spacers, slowing down dark current.
k11= 1.0 x 106 M-1s-1 k11= 1.0 x 10-9 M-1s-1
9. Motivations
Generally, the observed trends in the redox potentials are dependent on
geometrical distortions caused by the introduced ligands.
10. Potential Drawbacks
The redox potential of the parent complex
([Fe(phen)3]2+/3+) (1.22 V vs SHE) must be lowered
by 0.2 V to allow dye regeneration.
Light absorption in the visible spectrum (400-700
nm) might reduce the photocurrent.
Ligand substitutions at the 5,6 positions are barely
described in the literature.
Faster self-exchange electron rates are also related
to faster recombination kinetics.
11. Synthesis of benzo[f][1,10]phenanthroline ligand
The syntheses of ligands as well as the ferrous complexes are
described in the literature. Low yields are reported for the ligands,
ranging from 15 to 30% due to multiple steps
Skraup
synthesis
12. Characterization of the complexes
1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, ESR (Fe3+), IR spectroscopy,
and high resolution mass spectroscopy can be used
to characterize the ligands and complexes.
Magnetic susceptibility measurements through the
Evans method can be used to corroborate the low
spin nature of the [Fe(bphen)3]2+/3+ complexes.
UV/Vis/NIR absorption spectra are obtained.
Cyclic voltammetry experiments are
performed to fulfill the reversibility criteria
13. Characterization of the complexes
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction
NMR line-broadening technique is used to measure
the electron transfer self-exchange rate. Faster self-
exchange translates into faster regeneration kinetics.
14. Preparation of electrolytes
Typical example of an electrolyte preparation: “The
electrolyte consists of 0.22 M [Fe(bphen)3]2+ , 0.05 M
[Fe(bphen)3]3+ , 0.1 M LiClO4, and 0.2 M 4-tert-
butylpyridine in acetonitrile.”
Decreases
photocurrent,
increases
photovoltage
Increases
photocurrent
, decreases
photovoltage
15. Experiments with electrolytes
The redox potential of the electrolytes is calculated using
the Nernst equation and the formal potentials obtained
from cyclic voltammetry.
YD2-o-C8 porphyrin dye (1.29 V vs. NHE)
J/V and IPCE spectra.
- Octyloxy groups reduce charge
recombination
- 2.12 x 105 M-1 cm-1 (400 to 500 nm)
16. References
1. Ooyama, Y; Harima Y. ChemPhysChem. 2012, 13, 4032.
2. A. Listorti, B. O’Regan and J. R. Durrant, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 3381-3399.
3. Boschloo, G.; Hagfeldt, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1819−1826.
4. Hardin, B; McGehee, M. Nat. Phot. 2012, 6, 162-169.
5. Yum, J.; Gratzel, M; Baranoff, E. Nat. Comm. 2011, 3, 1-8.
6. Mayer, J; Yoder, J. J. Am. Chem Soc. 2003, 125. 2629-2640.
7. Slattery, S. Inorg. Chim. Act. 2004, 357, 202-206.
8. Hamman, T; Xie, Y. J. Phys Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 328-332.
9. Koft, E; Case, F. J. Org. Chem., 1962, 27 , 865–868.
10. Jameson, D; Anand, R. J. Chem. Educ., 2000, 77 , 88.
11. Hara, K. and Arakawa, H. Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering, 2005, 15, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd,
Chichester, UK.
12. Yella, A.; Lee, H.-W.; Tsao, H. N.; Yi, C.; Chandiran, A. K.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Diau, E. W.-G.; Yeh, C.-Y.;
Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Grätzel, M. Science 2011, 334,629−634.