The First Seminole War

The First Seminole War
The First Seminole War was the first of three conflicts in the early 19th century that involved the United States Army and the Seminole population in
Florida. At the time, Florida was still under the control of Spain. Most of its population consisted of the Seminole Native Americans and African
Americans. The dates of the First Seminole War are debated but most believe that it occurred between 1816 and 1818. This war took place after theWar
of 1812 and tensions were still high between the United States, Spain, and Great Britain. Spain still had control of Florida, but they didn't do a good
job of enforcing the borders (Mahon, 1998). In 1812, a fort was built near the Apalachicola River in Florida. This was used as a strategic point during
the conflict and tried to recruit Seminoles into the American army.
After the War of 1812 was over, the fort built near the Apalachicola River was taken over by African Americans and was then deemed the "Negro
fort." The people in neighboring states were outraged by this and couldn't believe it really existed. General Andrew Jackson wanted this fort to be gone
and threatened Spain about it. Soon after, Fort Scott was built right above the Florida border in response to the "Negro fort." It was put there so the
American troops could watch over what was happening in Florida. The indigenous people, the Seminoles, still very much inhabited the area and didn't
like this.
In 1816, a supply ship that was transferring equipment to Fort Scott was
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

U.S. History 1865 to 1945 Worksheet Essay
U.S. History 1865 to 1945 Worksheet
Matrices
Using the information from your textbook and classroom discussion complete the following matrices.
1.Era of Reconstruction Matrix
While completing the Matrix, contrast presidential reconstruction plans with congressional reconstruction. Note key people, major dates, policies, and
outcomes for the New South. If necessary, additional rows may be added to the matrix.
PlanKey PeopleDatesPoliciesOutcomes
Lincoln's 10%PlanAbraham Lincoln Andrew Johnson Congress General William Tecumseh Sherman John Wilkes Booth 1860–1864Wade–Dave Bill
The freeman's bureau Proclamation and Amnesty and ReconstructionThe Ten–Percent Plan was more of a political ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Income taxNational The incorporation of income taxes help build government revenue and redistribute wealth.
Short Answer
Using the information from your textbook and classroom discussion, prepare a minimum of 200–word response to the following questions:
1.To what extent did the Era of Reconstruction create a New South?
On December 8, 1863, approximately 16 months before the North defeated the South in the Civil War, Lincoln issued a proclamation that laid out his
vision of Reconstruction. For example, laws were passed requiring Southern states to adopt new constitutions in conformity with the U.S. Constitution,
and to ratify the 14th Amendment and grant blacks the right to vote. This was a drastic change because before the reconstruction era African
Americans were slaves and were not allowed to vote. The South entire society was impacted by the Era of Reconstruction from the way they lived to
how they made a living. The Reconstruction Era implemented various changes to the South as for as the workforce with a great emphasis on cash
crops the majority of the crops grown in the South were being imported. African–Americans also were giving the right to actively participate in the
government. A Rise of Merchants stores in the south sprang up around plantations to sell supplies on credit which allowed them to build a clientele and
make money.
2.What impact did the

The Legacy Of John Caldwell Calhoun
John Caldwell Calhoun was born March 18th, 1782 in Abbeville, South Carolina. In the year 1807, John Calhoun received admission to the South
Carolina bar and practiced law. The year after, he was elected into the state legislature of South Carolina, where he served for two years leading to his
election to the U.S House of Representatives in the year 1810. In 1817, John Calhoun was appointed as Secretary of War by President Monroe, in
which during his term, he made substantial changes to the War Department. Calhoun served two terms as Vice President: in 1825 with John Quincy
and in 1829 with Andrew Jackson. In 1832 he quit his Vice President position and returned to South Carolina as a Senator, a position which he held for
eleven years. In ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Then he served as a Senator of Kentucky from the years of 1806 and 1807, and returned to the State House of Representatives, from the years of 1807
until 1809. Henry then returned to the Senate until 1811. Clay became one of the leaders of an anti–British group known as the War Hawks while he
was a U.S Representative from 1815 to 1825. After his term as Secretary of State, Henry returned to the U.S Senate from 1831 to 1852. Clay's
recognition as a compromiser originated from his involvement in the Missouri Compromise. Henry's appointment as the Secretary of State caused
controversy. His pursuit for the Presidency in the 1824 election ended with no majority for any of the candidates. Clay supported John Adams
instead of Andrew Jackson, which violated the instructions of the Kentucky legislature. Due to the informal precedent that the Secretary of State
would eventually assume the presidency, Jackson supporters pictured Clay's position as Secretary of State as a "corrupt bargain." Nevertheless,
Clay had experience as a diplomat and a goal to pursue as Secretary of State. Clay served in the Peace Commission after the War of 1812 which
negotiated the Treaty of Ghent with the British in 1814. As one of the commissioners, Clay urged to keep the British from receiving free navigation on
to the Mississippi River. Clay had based his policy plan on the "American System," dwelling upon the federal support of the national economic
development. To that time in history, Clay had

Accelerated US History
Accelerated US History I
In the Presidential Election of 1824, Andrew Jackson – the "people's choice" – lost the ballot by way of a "corrupt bargain" in the House of
Representatives. Four years later and with the backing of a larger political following, Jackson became president, campaigning to the middle class and
offering the opportunities of a benevolent democracy. Jackson's supporters, the Jacksonians, were as diverse as they were numerous; northern farmers,
southern and western yeomen, and even urban immigrants all joined the ranks of the Champion of the Common Man (OI). During Andrew Jackson's
two terms, the state of Jacksonian Democracy that took form upheld the principles of equality and majority rule that bound the United States together
politically, economically and socially. During the 1820s and 1830s, Jacksonians served as guardians of the Constitution and equality of economic
opportunity, and functioned as a catalyst for popular sovereignty, but sacrificed some individual liberties to advance the political democracy in the
union. As President, Andrew Jackson strictly adhered to the guidelines set in the Constitution to uphold the union. In 1830, Andrew Jackson vetoed the
bill, passed in Congress, which pushed for a federally funded road system to be developed in Kentucky (OI). To defend this denial, Jackson abided by
the Constitution's declaration that intra–state internal improvements are to be funded by the states, not the federal government.

Christopher Columbus, Andrew Jackson, And President Van Buren
This war began when the White man crossed the Atlantic Ocean in search of independence. They left Europe and slowly began fighting for a better
life which eventually led to their break away from the harsh brutalities of the British government. When, in all reality, their search for independence led
to the abolishment of the freedom of the Native Americans. Instead of placing light onto this subject, it is swept under the rug in schools across
America today. I believe that the way the American government chose to gain territory was selfish and ignorant and led to the loss of many cultures
and precious lives. Some of the ways this happened was by the removal of rights, battles, untruthful treaties, and confiscation of land. In many ways
American history books and movies portray Christopher Columbus, Andrew Jackson, and President Van Buren to be American heroes, but these
so–called "heroes" are actually murderers, thieves, and liars. Jackson and Van Buren believed that the Indians needed to become civilized and convert
to Christianity, yet the actions these two presidents practiced were opposite of what the religion boasts. Obviously, they were the ones who needed to
become civilized and remember where they came from and that what they were taking away from the Indians is exactly what they had fought for.
Whenever Jackson was elected president, he implemented laws that "did away with the tribe as a legal unit" and made them "subject to militia duty
and state taxes,"

Analysis Of ' Chasing Lincoln 's Killer ' By James L. Swanson
The feeling of change, is one many are afraid of. Moreover, the possibility of moving on from the style of one life into the unknown world where they
are vulnerable, is frightening to many, unthinkable to some. After the Civil War, hundreds of thousands of Southerners refused to believe in a world
where African Americans were also citizens of the Union, one where they were all men were free. While most maintained peace in order to prevent
more mayhem, some decided to act out. John Wilkes Booth was one of these such men, and he demonstrated his anger through murder. Booth
assassinated President Abraham Lincoln on April 15th, 1865 .The book, Chasing Lincoln's Killer, written by James L. Swanson reports the anger
felt by Booth, in addition to the manhunt that followed, and the shocked nation left behind. The magnitude of emotions felt by Booth leads him to
this traitorous act, and this text shows a lot about the how people react to change in their life, because of fear of change, and the annoyance of a
new system. Most importantly this text shows us how even through the pain from the worst, there is always a better door in life, waiting to be
opened. How you ever looked around in how much change is going on in our world? A new style of life is emerging, and that's how it felt in 1865,
at the end of the civil war. However, there were plenty of people afraid of the new power that was given to freed African Americans. They now had the
ability to vote, which could completely

Andrew Jackson Was An Influential President
According to Andrew Jackson, "It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their own selfish purposes".
Jackson believed that the rich were using their position of power to become wealthy. Jackson's main goal during his presidency was to shift the power
from the rich overpowering leaders to the more common people. He believed that the common people would do a better job at running the government
and he wanted the voices of the people to be heard. Jackson was a debated president during his presidency however he did many influential things that
was important to the overall benefit of the country. Even though he set up the Trail of Tears that forced many Native Americans from their homes ,
Andrew Jackson was an influential president because he destroyed the national bank which ultimately saved our country from debt and he was
instrumental in the acquisition of Florida. Andrew Jackson continues to prove that he was an influential President because the things he did when he
was president continue to benefit United States to this day.
Andrew Jackson was the seventh president of the United States. Jackson was born on March 15, 1767 in North Carolina. His family immigrated
before he was born from Scotland and Ireland however Jackson was born in the United States. His family was a modest farm family who worked hard
for their money. Jackson earlier in his life was a lawyer and later served as a military general during the time that Monroe

The Road Of The Trail Of Tears
The Trail of Tears has been one of the most controversial government sponsored events in American History. Was America justified in destroying a
culture in its pursuit of Manifest Destiny, or did they feel it was their only option in this matter at the time? Based on research, I feel that the American
policy of Indian removal and relocation was extremely unethical and unjustified in its motives and execution. Before Europeans arrived in present–day
America, the Native Americans were living on millions of acres of land their ancestors had occupied and cultivated. Many Native Americans were
initially somewhat willing to share land with original settlers. However, when settlers began taking land that already belonged to the Natives,... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Cherokee Indians and some Choctaw Indians attempted to follow these guide lines and blend in with Americans, sending their children to schools and
some even started to own slaves. Even though many Cherokee and Choctaw Indians tried to assimilate with the American culture, they were still forced
out of their homeland and were rarely truly accepted by the white population as anything other than tamer savages.
Despite the Native's attempts to conform to society, they were still discriminated against, losing their land, homes, and property. As white settlers began
to realize the value of the Native's land, many began to encroach west after the Louisiana Purchase. Settler's wished to use the land for plantations and
farms. As the desire and need for more land grew, the state governments began to realize the futility of trying to contain the settlers' attitude of Manifest
Destiny and they soon joined in making laws that would limit the rights of the Native Americans. The Supreme Court attempted to stop this harsh
treatment of the Natives, but were ultimately ignored as the harsh treatment continued. Southern states were determined to have the Native's land for
their own and they felt this was reinforced

Andy's Gift Essay
Andy's Gift
No matter who you are, the world won't stop existing if you disappear. Your beloved ones will just learn to live without you. "Andy's Gift", written
by Michel Faber in 2001, tells a story about how hard it can be to return to normality, when you've been cut off from the outside world for so long.
The world is constantly changing and if you're not there, it's just too bad, the lives of everyone else's will continue. That is what happens for the
protagonist Andrew. "Occasionally he'd peek out at the world, and for his peek hole he'd use the shrieking idiot the nursing staff called Andy." (p. 1,
l.3–4)
For 5 years, Andrew has been trapped in the body of a shrieking idiot called Andy. Finally, a miracle happens and he breaks free. He gets to be Andrew
again, but there's a problem. His wife has changed, she is no longer the woman he married, his oldest son doesn't seem excited about his return and his
two youngest kids think the madman Andy, is better at howling.
In the beginning, the story takes place at a nursing home. Andrew wakes up in an institutional pyjama and is greeted by an old man, who's sitting in the
bed right next to him.
When Andrew answers back, it is to the old man's surprise. "Ha! Good for you, Andy boy!" said his neighbour, as if impressed." (p. 1, l. 11) The nurse
who's arriving next doesn't believe the old man ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Andrew doesn't seem much excited about returning back home. "...But he found that her feelings were of no interest to him." (p. 4, l. 102) He's no
longer interested in his wife's feelings, a person who meant a lot to him before. His love for his family has slowly been fading away. "A child's
painting, rather tattered and signed Robert, was almost hidden behind the bedhead." (p. 1, l. 15–16) Robert's, his oldest son, painting symbolizes his
children, his family and how they've been forgotten, hidden away the past 5

Analysis Of The Poem ' The Gospel Of Wealth '
Dagan Martinez Dr. Amanda Bruce AMH2020 26 September 2014 Comparison, Analysis, and Criticism of Economic Ideals in the Gilded Age In
his essay, "The Gospel of Wealth," Andrew Carnegie argues that the imbalance of economic wealth is essential to the advancement of society. In
days past, there was little difference between the quality of life between a ruler and his subject. Alluding to a time when Carnegie visited the chief
of an indigenous American tribe, he observed that the Chief of the Indians ', who lived in a state of antiquity, tent was no different from even the
poorest among the tribe. Returning back to this stage of civilization would be detrimental to both the ruler and subject. Is it better for all of us to live
in poverty than for a few of us to have riches? Shouldn 't those who prove themselves masters in art and literature and those of higher intelligence have
more than those with no talent? This is the way society is progressing. Whether or not one actually believes that doesn 't matter, as changing the
destiny of civilization is beyond one 's power. (Carnegie, 28–29) It is better to improve society through the construction public foundations such as
museums and libraries rather than alms–giving. Through alms–giving, one encourages laziness and vagrancy rather than integrity, and thus damages
society. Through public structures, one provides support for those who actually wish to succeed can rise in society. Those who are most deserving of
alms rarely need

Relationship Between The Us And Indian Communities Of...
The US in the 1830s debated the relationship between the US and Indian communities of North America. The principles calling for equal rights and
political democracy of the people in America were in contradiction with the principles the US was initially against. American colonists began to view
the vast expanse of lands controlled by Indians as desirable and could now use Indians in a new way: to acquire land for development . As the rapidly
growing United States began to move towards the South in the early nineteenth century, white settlers were confronted by the Cherokee, Creek,
Choctaw, Chickasaw and Seminole nations, which became an obstacle in the way of their plight to acquire land to grow cotton and crops. In order to
effectively ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This declared Indian Removal as unconstitutional since sovereign nations could not be constrained. Accordingly, the question, "What is the best
explanation for why President Andrew Jackson and the United States continued with Indian removal even after the court deemed the forced removal
of and interference in the affairs of sovereign nations unconstitutional?" is viable because it analyzes and examines the arguments and describes the
principles the US relied on and practiced as one description and assessment of Jacksonian Democracy and thus explains why they were able to
continue with Indian Removal. Indian removal was maintained because of the varying points of view between the three parties: President Jackson
(Pro–Removal), the Supreme Court and the Indians. This transformed into a quarrel between the President Jackson and the Supreme Court while the
Indians and their views were completely and utterly disregarded. The varying points of view brought up contradictions and created tensions that
ultimately created a window for Indian Removal.
Greed for Land and Power
Many Americans advocated Indian removal because of their greedy intentions for power and land. The US took control of Indian land through treaties.
At first, these treaties were to maintain peace. However, as time went on, the US started taking advantage of the Indians' generosity and their greed got
worse. Before, it was just a

The Road Of Success : Andrew Jackson
The Road To Success Andrew Jackson was not, by the common meaning of the word, a good person. Jackson was the clear cause of the Trail of
Tears, but it was for a good reason. Jackson was a slaveowner that didn't free a single one of his slaves, but he fought for equality. Jackson is often
looked upon as a horrible blemish dotting America's history, but he was truly a shining light. Jackson is so widely hated today that he was recently
moved to the back of the $20 bill over someone who wasn't even a president. Luckily for Andrew Jackson, being a subpar person doesn't mean that you
won't be one of the greatest presidents this country has ever seen, and this is one of those cases. Andrew Jackson was the only president to leave the
country debt–free, and he was the first president to fight for the people's rights. He stuck to his ideals, followed through on his promises, and had an
incredible way of managing his relations with other countries. For these reasons: his economic improvements, his foreign policy, his outstanding
popularity at the time, and his unwavering ideals, Jackson was by far the most successful president in United States History.
Andrew Jackson was the first President to speak for the common working class man instead of the wealthy elite, and he was able to successfully take
the people's side in the bank debate and founded the Democratic Party to fight for the people, and he was just so popular that he would've won an
earlier term if the election didn't

Cherokee Native American Indians and the Trail of Tears
Cherokee Native American Indians and the Trail of Tears
What made the Cherokee culture distinctive towards others in the Trail of Tears time period was that they had a more peaceful, harmless outlook on
the situation. In 1814, Andrew Jackson who would eventually become the President of the United States, had his and his whole army's lives on the line
in the Battle of Horseshoe Bend to the British forces when the Cherokee allied with them to win the battle. Surprisingly, 16 years later when Jackson
was President of the United States, he made the deciding decision on the controversy of whether or not the Cherokee deserved their land. Jackson
completed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, sending the Cherokee out of their own land which they ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They were walking mostly through moist valleys and forests which provided some nutrition and shelter. The weather was overall favorable for the
Cherokee during the Trail of Tears. The rivers were also helpful to the Cherokee as a source of food and basis for navigation.
Some may wonder why the Cherokee did not fight for their land. Historians suggest that the Cherokee knew America was a more powerful force.
They were also a peaceful tribe that didn't wish to start a war, so they instead chose to go and find new land. Based on their belief system they valued
peace, not violence. This made the Cherokee distinctive to other tribes involved in the Trail of Tears, because they peacefully left while the other
tribes planned to fight until they realized they had a small chance of winning a battle against Jackson and America. The Cherokee knew that America
was acting harsh and cruel towards them, but they didn't believe strongly in acts of violence. The Cherokee would also communicate with Jackson
occasionally (not often at all) about their progress and health during their voyage. After their long, treacherous voyage, they reached their new land
where they had to resettle, and had to start all over again.
When the Cherokee resettled, they were a different group with no leaders; everybody became the same during their voyage to new settlement. The
Cherokee then became more civilized, and began to fade

Essay on Analyis of Knowledge of a Possibility by JUllary...
The value of literature as a source of knowledge is a timeless debate that varies depending on how knowledge is defined. I will adopt Hillary
Putnam's theory of "Knowledge of a Possibility" (Putnam 488) in "Literature Science, and Reflection" (1976), and focus on the value of literature as a
source of conceptual knowledge. The emergence of the novel brought with it conventions for a more realistic writing style that aimed to appeal to the
common readers. Variations of the degree of realism ranged from writing that tried to present a fully authentic experience of life, known as Formal
Realism, and writing that offers some authentic aspects of life but also conserves characteristics of classic genres of epics and romances. These ... Show
The criterion for knowledge is rather complex and Putnam addresses literary knowledge in "both the empirical and conceptual elements" (Putnam
488). On the one hand, there are the conceptual elements of knowledge, those that can be considered "knowledge of possibility" (Putnam 488) that
allow us to think of new possibilities through "conceptual discovery" (Putnam 488). Conceptual knowledge allows readers to get a sense of what
something is like or provide insight to another person's beliefs. There are not necessarily claims to truth in this form of knowledge, but in some
instances the hypotheses we obtain from literature may be tested confirmed through personal experience, and consequently may be confirmed or
falsified. On the other hand there is empirical knowledge, which is gained through observations, scientific experimentation, and evidence. In this
context, Putnam rejects the ability of literature to provide readers with empirical knowledge. In his example about The Golden Notebook by Doris
Lessing, Putnam suggests that the book provides knowledge of "what it was like to be a communist in the 1940s" (Putnam 489) but offers a
disclaimer "you may say to yourself this is what it must have been like; but...you have no right to say "I know what this is what it was like"" (Putnam
489). Despite this distinction, Putnam still asserts the value of knowledge in literature "Dorris

Social Media and the Law
The First Amendment, granting Americans the right to freedom of press, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly and freedom to
petition the government, has been one of the most heavily debated since its ratification in 1791. For years, court cases pertaining to the amendment
have abounded, particularly in relation to the freedom of speech. From cases defining obscenity to those allowing for expression, the meaning of the
freedom of speech has changed greatly through the years. Similarly, so has the freedom of press. As technology evolves– from the first printing press
to Google Glass – so too does the media. New media calls for new laws and precedents, and social media has been no exception. The rapid pace and...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A federal court ruled that online services were simply distributors and therefore not liable for any information posted on their servers (Cubby, Inc. v.
CompuServe, Inc.). This set precedent for online libel for years to come. A 1995 case, Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy, had a different outcome for
internet service providers. Prodigy hosted a "Money Talk" bulletin board open for user comment, and on that board, a user alleged that Stratton
Oakmont, Inc. and its president had committed criminal and fraudulent acts. The company and its president then sued Prodigy for defamation,
contending that Prodigy was a "publisher" and therefore liable. The plaintiff argued that this case was different than Cubby v. CompuServe because
Prodigy said on its bulletin board that it exercised editorial control, and the court found this to be true, ruling in favor of Stratton Oakmont, Inc.
(Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy). The nation, and Congress, took note of the decision. A year later in 1996, Congress passed the Communications
Decency Act (also referred to as the Telecommunications Act). The act changed internet and the First Amendment, and section 230 specifically
addressed how interactive computer services were legally regarded. Instead of falling into a category with newspapers or magazines, which are liable for

Reconstruction Policies And Their Effects
Reconstruction Policies and Their Effects Three new Constitutional Amendments were ratified during the Reconstruction Era as well as many policies
on both the state and federal levels. The amendments that were ratified during the Reconstruction Era were the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth
amendments. The policies to assimilate the Southern states back into the union and for Reconstruction all varied dramatically between the Radical
Republicans in Congress, President Abraham Lincoln, and President Andrew Johnson. President Lincoln's Reconstruction plan was started before the
Civil War even ended. He wanted to reunify the North and South in his plan called the "Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction", in this plan he
would ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Lincoln pocket–vetoed to Wade–Davis Bill and it was not re–introduced. After President Lincoln's assassination, then Vice–President Andrew Johnson
became president. He pardoned all Confederates but he required the members of the planter class and Confederate leadership to write to him
personally for pardons. He also returned property, other than slaves, to those who pledged loyalty to the Union and promised to support the
Thirteenth Amendment. Johnson was against slavery, but mostly because he was opposed to the Southern planter class. His plans were very lenient
and allowed the formation of the Black Codes in the South, which were a set of laws that limited freedoms of the former slaves that lived there.
Initially Johnson's plans were supported, but the Radical Republicans wanted the rights promised in the Declaration of Independence to be extended to
all free men, including former slaves. President Johnson was impeached on February 24, 1868. It was only by one vote that he was not removed from
office, but his impeachment greatly reduced his influence over Reconstruction. This was the first time in history that a sitting President was impeached.
Congressional (Radical) Reconstruction was the plan set by Radical Republicans in Congress. Leaders of the Radical Republicans included Thaddeus
Stevens, who opposed the leniency granted by President

Andrew Jackson 's President Of The United States
On many accounts people look back on Andrew Jackson and applaud his terms as president. But those people do not look closer into his term on the
huge mistake he made. To appeal his personal feelings and not for the greater good of the country, president Jackson vetoed the bill that would renew
the Bank of the United States (BUS) in 1832. Because of this veto, state banks were unleashed from their restrictions and given the freedom they
craved so badly. "He believed the financial sector of the American economy was spoiled, corrupt and bad for the overall health of the nation, and so he
destroyed, at great length, great drama and great cost, the Bank of the United States."1 Due to many experiences brought up with him, Andrew Jackson
failed ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He thought they all violated the Constitution. But he was led by the men around him to focus his aversion on the federal Bank, which being the
biggest must be the worst and whose regulatory pressure on the state banks must obviously be the oppression to be expected from a great, soulless
corporation.4
This would cause his decision to veto the bill passed by congress and cause uproar. The president of the BUS at the time, Nicolas Biddle, would put
up a long fight to try to save the bank he loved so much.5 One of the challenges faced with the decision to veto the bill was how the American people
felt on the issue. Jackson did not take into account how this would affect the country and the people living within it. "This was personal misfortune,
undeserved and severe. The more important victim was the American people. For with destruction of the United States Bank there was removed from
an overexcitable economy the influence most effective in moderating its booms and depressions."6 In spite of the American people and their opinion,
Jackson acted on his own and in doing so made decisions that were not for him to do without having something to back up his words. In his famous
veto message, he declared the bank "unconstitutional" whereas the Supreme Court would have never declared the Bank constitution nor Congress if
that were the case.7 Even some of the great people from the past supported the very thing Jackson

The Flea, By Andrew Marvell
John Donne 's, "The Flea," and Andrew Marvell's To His Coy Mistress are persuasive poem in which the speaker is attempting to establish a sexual
union with his significant other. These poems is spoken by a male lover to his female beloved as an attempt to convince her to sleep with him. John
Donne and Marvell brings out and shapes this meaning through his collective use of conceit, rhythm, and rhyme scheme. The basic theme of the
poems is the speaker's need to turn his "coy mistress" into a "willing mistress".
Donne uses the flea as a conceit, to represent a sexual union with his significant other. Marvell using his way with words to convince his lover to a
sexual union. In the first stanza in The Flea, a flea bites the speaker and woman. He responds to this incident by saying, "And in this flea our
bloods mingled be." (line 4). He is suggesting that they are united in this flea and would equally be united in intimacy. In the first stanza of "To His
Coy Mistress", the speaker tells his woman that if they had more time and space that her coyness wouldn't be a crime. He says this, "Had we but
World enough, and Time, This coyness lady were no crime". (line 1,2) Marvell also would compliment her and admire her. In the "Flea", the speaker
tries to marry the man and woman while in "To His Coy Mistress" the man is not trying to marry the
Duncan 2 two but trying to get the lady to sleep with him by using time. Donne states, "This flea is you and I, and this our marriage bed, and

The War Of The American War II
World War II is one of the most prolific events in American history. While soldiers were away on foreign soil, thousands of Americans at home were
doing their part as well. For example many citizens worked in factories across the nation producing the supplies the military needed to accomplish their
goal. When people think of the places that most frequently furnished these products the common perception is that most products were manufactured in
the northern industrial states, although this is not always the case. Throughout the war Louisiana played a critical role in adequately preparing for the
war. Andrew Higgins has become famous for his role in inventing the Higgins's Craft, which played a critical role in the beach landings in ... Show
Louisiana played an important role in nearly every aspect of America's success in World War II, and likewise, it deserves to be highlighted. The
American army lacked adequate preparation to go to war in 1941, but that soon changed. Nearly half a million soldiers participated in a series of
military maneuvers, or games, across mostly north Louisiana. Fourteen of the 27 divisions of the army took place in these events. The Louisiana
maneuvers have become one of the largest peacetime military maneuvers in American history. This practice proved to be important for the army.
Brigadier Raymond H Fleming explained that everything the United States Army had, except for bullets, would be turned loose in Louisiana. This
allowed for the soldiers, most of them being newly enlisted, to gather wartime experience. Likewise, not all commands were fully equipped with the
latest technology, but through these games the ill–equipped commands were able to see the effectiveness of the new technology. The soldiers that
endured these games went through full paced war–like maneuvers. The Army was divided into two and simulated a mock war between each other. The
two "armies" went back and forth between over the course of ten days. They struggled through long hours and simulated combat. Along with the
struggle of

On How the American Indians Were Removed from Their Land
"One by one Indian peoples were removed to the West. The Delaware, the Ottawa, Shawnee, Pawnee and Potawatomi, the Sauk and Fox, Miami and
Kickapoo, the Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek and Seminole. In all some 90 thousand Indians were relocated. The Cherokee were among the last to go.
Some reluctantly agreed to move. Others were driven from their homes at bayonet point. Almost two thousands of them died along the route they
remembered as the Trail of Tears." For decades, the state of Georgia sought to enforce its authority over the Cherokee Nation, but its efforts had little
effect until the election of President Andrew Jackson, a longtime supporter of Indian removal. In 1838 the U.S. government forced the Cherokee
Indians out of their land ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He was going to relocate the eastern tribes beyond the Mississippi River. Another President of the United States, James Monroe, wrote a letter to
Andrew Jackson that stated, "I have long viewed treaties with the Indians an absurdity not to be reconciled to the principles of our government."
The Choctaw relocation began in 1830, seven years later the Chickasaw were removed. In 1836 the Creek were removed by force that was
followed by the negotiations that started in 1832. The Seminole removal triggered a 7 year war that ended in 1843. They had been given 2 years
to pack and move, and after the two years they would be moved by force. The government sent 7,000 troops to start the moving process. The
Indians were forced off their land at bayonet point. They were not given any extra time to pack, they started loading and the whites took their homes
and lands as soon as they were gone. Being forced out of their land and to another affected the Indians more than most people know. About four
thousand Cherokee people died on their way to the new land, some died of cold, hunger, or diseases. Some of the Indians later committed arson and
murder because of how hard it was for them to get over the treatment of their people. In

Look again at the three seventeenth century poems, To His...
Look again at the three seventeenth century poems, To His Coy Mistress,
The Flea, and Shall I compare thee. In what ways have the three poets used, or departed from, the conventions of their time and why do you think they
have been successful in ...
Look again at the three seventeenth century poems, "To His Coy
Mistress", "The Flea", and "Shall I compare thee". In what ways have the three poets used, or departed from, the conventions of their time and why
do you think they have been successful in entertaining their readers? "To His Coy Mistress", "The Flea" and "Shall I Compare Thee" are all poems
written in the 17th century. Marvell, Donne and Shakespeare who were the authors of the poems, departed from conventions of ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
It was customary in the 17th century to write poems about love in comparison to nature and he uses the world to describe his space of love. In just
two lines we can already the feel of the poem and build up a picture of his passion. The poet is attempting in the first stanza, through flattery, to win
over his Lady and persuade her to consummate their love. This stanza is typically metaphysical, demonstrating a controversial use of imagery, for
example, "Thou by the Indian Ganges side, shouldst rubies find; I by the tide" and a double entendre, for example when he talks about his "vegetable
love".
It is written in the style of other poems of that time. However, half way through the stanza his passionate words turn gently satirical and we feel a
change in the poet's tone. For example he says "Love you ten years before the Flood and you should, if you please, refuse till the conversion of the
Jews". Here his flattery turns slightly frightening and we start to wonder if the poet's true intentions are purely innocent or very selfish.
"But at my back I always hear, time's winged chariot hurrying near" is a famous phrase and is used in the second stanza to mark a change in the
atmosphere. The speed up of pace, as the verse goes on, reveals desperation and anxiety that he might not get his own way after all.
In contrast to the first stanza, where he used flattery

The Era Of The Common Man
The Jacksonian period has been regarded as the era of the "common man", this characterization only holds true in regard to politics. Jackson's action in
economic development was little different from when this era began. His view towards reforms were threatening and unwanting.Jackson was relentless
in his strive for presidency. Jackson lost his first presidential run to John Quincy Adams in 1824 despite having the popular and electoral votes. The
Jacksonians (supporters of Jackson) called this event the "Corrupt Bargain" due to Henry Clay support of Adams after he was out of the race.
Jackson won the following election in 1828, after a war of words were exchanged between supporters of Jackson and Adams. The Jacksonians
accused Adams of being wasteful with money, while Adams supporters accused Jackson of being a murderer in the war of 1812 and called his wife
a bigamist. These accusations got to Rachel and weeks later she passed. Nonetheless, this was still a victory for the new Democratic Republicans
against the National Republicans. Politically, the age of Jackson was a triumph for the common man since politics were more open. Before Jackson
politics were only indulged in by aristocrats and elites; With Jackson it was open to all white male citizens. It has also be noted that before Jackson
came into office that there was expansion in voting with Ohio and other new western states. These new constitutions made older states conform to their
laws due to the fear of losing

Cherokee Population Losses During Trail Of Tears : A New...
Currently, when the losses suffered by the Cherokee Nation as a result of their forced removal are discussed, there is a focus on the loss in
numbers. However, Russell Thornton's "Cherokee Population Losses During Trail of Tears: A New Perspective and a New Estimate" clearly
presents a new, suitably researched perspective that argues the focus should not be only on those that died, but also on those that never lived.
Thornton is a professor at UCLA in the Anthropology department. He has a number of degrees related to this study, including a Ph.D. in Sociology
and a postdoctoral in Social Relations from Harvard, and specializes in Native American studies. He is clearly appropriately acquainted with this
field, and his knowledge of the subject matter is evident in this piece. However, he also cites a number of papers and books by other authors, so as
not to rely purely on his knowledge. Thornton asserts in his abstract that the number of Cherokees who died may have been twice the currently
accepted number. However, this is not what he says the number of Cherokees . He argues that the losses of theCherokee Nation should be determined
based upon the number of Cherokee who would have lived, not the ones who died, a vital distinction when one considers the drastic reduction in birth
rate immediately following removal. However, when reading this article, one must take into account the potential for bias outside of confidence in
one's research. It is possible that as a Cherokee,

Andrew Marvell, вЂњto His Coy MistressвЂќ
Andrew Marvell, "To His Coy Mistress" In 'To His Coy Mistress' the speaker carefully constructs a subtle and logical argument as to why his addressee
should sexually unite with him. The speaker attempts this proposition through finesse in manipulating reason, form and imagery. The reasoning
employed would be familiar to a reader educated in Renaissance England, as it is reminiscent of classical philosophical logic, entailing a statement, a
counter–statement and a resolution. In line with this method Marvell's speaker codes his argument in classical imagery. To understand this argument I
will be approaching the poem in three clearly defined sections, which are denoted in the poem with indented lines. The first of these section... Show
The next section runs from lines 21 to 32, here the speaker moves away from the hypothetical to reality but retains the melodramatic language used
in the previous section to sustain the tenacity of his points. Time here is portrayed as chasing the speaker as opposed to being something the speaker
is in control of as in the end of the last section. This is done using the image of a 'winged chariot' (l.22), this has classical associations with Greek
mythology which relates to his form of argument. The meter of the poem is restrictively regular, this structure emphasises the idea that time is
constantly progressing; reflecting the speaker's argument. Space is no longer inhabited by images of movement and life like the rivers previously
mentioned but instead: 'before us lie / Deserts of vast eternity' (ll. 23–4). The desert has strong connotations with deathliness, an issue that the speaker
gruesomely develops upon and progresses within this section. The speaker implies on lines 26–7 that the only exploration of the mistress's body that
will be undertaken will be by the worms that are decomposing her body if she remains in her coy state. This thought that her sexuality should not be
wasted is elaborated upon with a crude pun on line 29: 'And your quaint honor turn to dust' which, as the Norton Anthology of Poetry explains in the
footnote, is a play on the Middle English noun queynte which means female genitals. These images of

The Equitable Change Of The Voting And Race Laws
The equitable change of the voting and race laws, widening the suffrage and equivalent rights for every single white male, were consistent
augmentations of the belief system of the American Revolution. These rights, be that as it may, were not stretched out to ladies or free dark
individuals. A religious recovery development called the Second Great Awakening, drove by Methodists and Baptists, changed the religious scene.
Another political gathering, the Democrats, had blended around Andrew Jackson, coming full circle in his race as President in 1828 and disparaging the
Adams organization 's vision of patriotism. The 1828 race was a watershed in constituent history, engaging the masses and focusing on identities, not
issues. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the event that a voter needed financial autonomy, then it appeared that the individuals who controlled his work could undoubtedly control his vote.
Humorously, pretty much as mechanical pay work made ward workers on a substantial new scale, the more seasoned republican duty to propertied
voters dropped out of support. As property necessities for voting were annulled, financial status vanished as an establishment for citizenship. By 1840
more than 90 percent of grown–up white men had the privilege to vote. Religion and freedom is a topic so critical and (in the First Amendment) an
outcome so pivotal that it is hard to envision causal associations being overlooked in the pre–Revolutionary period. However, that has been to a great
extent the case as British approach and practice have been investigated solely from the point of view of political oppression or financial misuse. Carl
Bridenbaugh has convincingly indicated how extraordinary was the provincial trepidation of a ministerial oppression designed by the Church of
England. Conceived in destitution, Andrew Jackson (1767–1845) had turned into a rich Tennessee legal advisor and rising youthful government official
by 1812, when war broke out between the United States and Britain. His administration in that contention earned Jackson national distinction as a
military saint, and he would turn into America 's most influential–and polarizing–political figure amid the 1820s and 1830s. After

Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller: Captains of...
Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller; Captains of industry, or robber barons? True, Andrew Carnegie and John D Rockefeller may have been the
most influential businessmen of the 19th century, but was the way they conducted business proper? To fully answer this question, we must look at the
following: First understand how Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller changed the market of their industries. Second, look at the similarities and
differences in how both men achieved domination. Third and lastly, Look at how both men treated their workers and customers in order achieve the
most possible profit for their company. Let us first look at Mr. Andrew Carnegie. Carnegie was a mogul in the steel industry. Carnegie
... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although Carnegie liked to be the tough businessman, he was not a monopolist and did not like monopolists. On the other side of the pool,
Rockefeller was dominating the oil industry with no mercy. He believed in primitive savagery in the world of business, where only the fittest
survived. He helped coin the term 'ruin or rule.' Rockefeller had a great belief in ruthless business, yet Carnegie did not. But in the end both had the
most successful companies in their industries. Although their industries were booming, customers and workers felt the cruel and harsh treatment the
two leaders had to offer. Rockefeller treated his customers as Carnegie treated his workers, cruel and harsh. Rockefeller wanted desprately for every
company to buy his product. He would use ruthless tactics such as start his own chain of grocery stores to put local merchants out of business if they
did not buy from his standard oil company. Carnegie dealt with his customers better than Rockefeller did but Carnegie dealt with his own workers like
ants on an ant farm. Carnegie treated his workers as nothing; he gave them nothing but a cold lack of diplomacy and consideration. Carnegie
encouraged rivalry amongst his workers for he thought it helped turn a better profit. These rivalries became so important to the workers that many
involved would not speak to each other for years. Although both Carnegie and Rockefeller used tactics that may have

Historical Events That Played A Paramount Role During...
There have been many historical events that played a paramount role in mapping the trends of the United States (US) from the 1800's to the 1920's.
Some of these events took place during very prominent periods of time such as the shaping of the Reconstruction Act in early 1865 to its end in 1877.
Reconstruction, after the Civil War, was the desired intent in bringing the southern states back into the Union, provide legal citizenship and protection
for the liberated slaves, and establish the rights of the people. The period of Reconstruction experienced many successes along with its failures. The
leading cause to the end of Reconstruction was due to the failures of the federal government and their lack to maintain the southern white resistance in
1877. This brings us to another event, which is the leading of US Industrialism in the 1900's. At this time the US nation produced more than thirty
percent of manufactured product throughout the world. Innovative ideas assisted in spurring the US past its rivals. Another historical event that still
has a place in society today is the women's suffrage movement and social reform that commenced as early as the mid–19th century. Women across the
nation stood together in their resolve for peace, equality and women's rights. Furthermore, their fight often took women away from their families. Some
women spent time in jail, publicized hunger strikes, and participated in protests in their efforts towards women's suffrage and social reform.

Analysis Of Henry Clay 's ' The Great Compromiser '
Title
Marissa Walker
Mr. Patrick Stoker
HISTORY 1301–140
November 20, 2015 Humans have faults. Politicians are humans therefore they have faults. No matter how people feel about politicians most of them
don't wake up in the morning wanting to ruin the country. Many politicians take advantage of opportunities to make the country better in the way they
see fit. Henry Clay is known for the strides he made to improve the quality of life for the American people. Henry Clay put forth every effort to
become the president of the United States. Clay never became president but he had great influence in government matters. His skill of effectively
charming people and finding balance in negotiations earned him the nickname, "The Great Compromiser" (Clay, 2015). Henry Clay was born and
raised in Virginia. Henry's family was part of the middle–class. Clay was studied law under the guidance of American revolutionist, George Wythe. He
was then admitted to the Virginia bar and moved to Kentucky to practice as a real estate lawyer settling land claims (Bowen, 2014). While in
Kentucky he married into a wealthy family who was popular among the social circles of Kentucky. After making a name for himself in Kentucky as a
well–established lawyer he was elected to be part of the Kentucky legislature in 1803. He served as part of the Kentucky House of Representatives
until 1806. After serving as a representative for the state of Kentucky, Clay was elected to fill a vacant seat in

The Louisiana Purchase Affected The Boundaries Of The...
The Louisiana Purchase affected the boundaries of the U.S. because when Jefferson bought the land, the boundaries were not clear. Spain claimed the
border was about one hundred miles west of the Mississippi River, while Jefferson was under the impression that it was around eight hundred miles
further west, which was defined by the crest of the Rocky Mountains. This lead to four different government–funded expeditions. The first was in 1804
when Lewis and Clark led an expedition westward to determine the upper reaches of the Missouri River. Throughout the expedition Lewis and Clark
were instructed to study the Indian culture, such as plants and animals. They were able to explore the Indian culture when they stayed their first winter
in huts beside the Mandan Indians. Without the help from the Indians they would not have survived the winter. They also had to draw out the
geography of the West. After the treacherous journey, they reached the Pacific Ocean on November 7, 1805. They made their journey back to St.
Louis and arrived back in September 1806. The other three expeditions that took place between 1804 and 1806 were to determine the southwestern
border. The first group went down the Red River to the Ouachita River, ending in current–day Arkansas. The second group went west into eastern Texas
along the Red River and the third group ended up going too far into the Spaniard's Territory, which caused them to get arrested and then released soon
after. The Adams–Onis treaty

Biography of Andrew Carnegie Essay
Biography of Andrew Carnegie
Andrew Carnegie was born into a poor working class family living in the town of Dunfermline, Scotland, in 1835. His father operated a small hand
looming business located in the family home. The Carnegies was literate, well read, and active in the politics of the day. It was a time of repression of
the Scottish worker by the Government, the employers, and the culture. Rebellious in thought as well as actively participating in protests was part of
the Carnegie family life style. He was exposed to all of Scotland's dramatic portrayal of Scottish Heroes. He learned the poetry and songs that were
filled with the heroics of the underdog and their fight for equality.
Andrew Carnegie's mother was the strong parent ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He had been offered free tickets which enabled him to become acquainted with Shakespeare's plays. While other young men lives were filled with
work, pleasure, and home, Andrew's life was filled with work, school, drama, and reading. He took advantage of the chance to study in a private
library and then he encouraged other young men to join him. He said, "I knew nothing of the base and vile. I had always been brought in contact
with good people. This was the world in which I dwelt with my companions, all of them refined young men, striving to improve themselves and
become respected citizens" (Carnegie 65). "I went to school at night and read history and classics on weekends. Every step of the way–factory drudge,
office boy, messenger, I pushed myself hard, mastered my duties, maximized opportunities, and waited with self–assurance the arrival of the next
chance".
There are many theories on why this Scottish immigrant succeeded in the "land of opportunity". It couldn't be based solely on the fact he spoke
English and was literate. He was one of among thousands of other Scottish immigrants who came to this country searching for economic opportunity.
Louis Hacker expounds on one theory on what drove him,
Because of his father's failure, because of his deep devotion to a mother . . . perhaps more because of the unequal society from which he had come and
which had squandered talent so stupidly, Carnegie

The Revolution Of The United States
Jacksonian Revolution In the early 1800s, it was generally known that in order to vote, a person was required to have a "stake" in society, they
either had to pay taxes or own so many acres of land. Voting rights varied throughout the colonies, for example, some colonies added restrictions due
to the religious beliefs of the voters. Furthermore, under the United States Constitution the presidential electors were chosen by the state legislatures
not by the people, as well, eligibility to vote for members of the House of Representatives was left to the states. Women, Indians and blacks (slave or
free) were restricted from voting almost in all regions. In our era, democracy is known as a government "for the people, by the people", and is ... Show
Many believed that giving the vote to all would lead to misguided legislation. For the same reason they feared the control of political "parties" by
corrupt people. The nation's founders believed that "democracy" could contain harmful effects, but eventually the term had become acceptable and
could be functional in American institutions. Citizens in the 1820s and 1830s slowly lost their fear that democracy would lead to anarchy. Though
each individual was to be given an equal start in life, equality of opportunity did not mean equality of results. In the campaign of 1828, Jackson, known
as "Old Hickory", triumphed over the unpopular President John Adams. Following Andrew Jackson's election of 1828, a birth of a new era of mass
democracy came about and influenced a revolution in American history. Of course, he could not go about making such radical changes without
supports, but that never created a problem. Jacksonian Democrats (supporters) were great in number, they created a new Democratic party. Jackson 's
policies followed the era of Jeffersonian democracy which dominated the previous political era. Yet, in contrast to the Jeffersonian era, Jacksonian
democracy promoted the strength of the presidency and executive branch at the expense of Congress, while also seeking to broaden the public 's
participation in government. More broadly, the term Jacksonian Democracy can be referred to as the period of the Second Party System when
Jacksonian

The Era Of The American Civil War
After the American Civil War, a laissez–faire government allowed for a new class of businessmen to rise to power: those who dominated an entire
industry, sometimes several markets. They were the hallmark of the so–called Gilded Age, which lasted from the end of reconstruction until the early
1900s. These men, known as Robber Barons, shaped the American economy, necessitating new laws to be signed to limit their power . Although there
were only four main Barons (John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, Cornelius Vanderbilt, and J.P. Morgan), they controlled much of the economy
with their four respective trades: Oil, steel, railroads, and banking . Although all four were important, Rockefeller and Carnegie stand head and
shoulders above the rest, becoming among the richest and most successful people the world has ever seen with the exception of some royalty.
During the Civil War, both the Union and Confederacy converted to "Total War" economies. With all industries, from manufacturing to agriculture to
textiles, focused on the war effort, many relatively new industries grew surpassingly large. Railroads in the North grew by around 16,000 miles, an
increase of nearly 75%. However, relatively small companies controlled relatively small sections of track privately. This set the stage for Vanderbilt to
begin buying up companies until he controlled one of the largest railroad networks ever seen. The latter parts of the Civil War and the early
reconstruction saw the rise of a new

The War Of 1812 Was A Great Deal Of Curiosity
History has the tendency to cause a great deal of curiosity. For instance, someone may wonder what the War of 1812 was and what difficulties the
United States had in waging the War of 1812. They also might ponder about why the War of 1812 was widely viewed as a victory for the United
States or how the war lead to an increasing pattern of diplomatic cooperation between the United States and Britain. Our very own seventh president,
Andrew Jackson, has meant a great deal in our history and some may ask what it was about his presidency that distinguished him compared to his
predecessors, or how he refined the role of the president. Last but not least, there remains the important question about what factors lead to the
increasing production of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Before getting to that point, we must first discuss the events that led to increasing tensions between the United States and Britain. One of the
difficulties that led to the War of 1812 was because of the failure of economic sanctions. In 1810, congress had replaced the Nonintercourse Act with
Macon's Bill No. 2 in hopes of creating easier trading throughout the nations. Through this time, and with the replacement of the Nonintercourse Act
with Macon's Bill No. 2, Napoleon had promised to withdraw decrees against U.S. shipping on the condition that if Britain should not follow suit,
Madison would have to force Britain to respect U.S. rights. Unfortunately, French seizures of U.S. ships continued and by the time Napoleon's requests
were clear, he had worsened Anglo–American tensions. In November of 1810, Madison had reimposed Nonintercourse against Britain which only
caused the two nations to have more conflicts. Another difficulty leading to the decision of war in 1812 was due to the frontier and Indian resistance.
Madison was also pushed toward a war against Britain because of mounting frustrations in the South and West. Farm prices plunged when Jefferson's
embargo shut off exports, but stayed low after the embargo was lifted. Much of the blame for persistent agricultural depression focused on the British
and their hold on overseas trade after 1808. As we can see, Britain and the U.S. had not been on good sides of the other. In fact, western

How Did The Indian Removal Act Under President Jackson...
Jake Vertin
TA: Andrew Dial
HIST 211
Fall 2014
In what ways did the Indian Removal act under President Jackson help establish a new interpretation of democracy and a movement away from
revolutionary era republicanism?
Andrew Jackson: The Era of the Common Man at the Expense of the "Other"
The essential question of the Jacksonian period in American history should not be focused on slavery, nor on western migration of native tribes (as
important, relevant, and controversial as these topics are). It is true that his administration did try to hide and dismiss slavery, and it is also true that in
the manner of its execution the policy of Indian removal was a horror. However, the fundamental question surrounding his presidency revolves around
how the doctrines of democracy replaced the doctrines of republicanism. Indeed, Jackson had a powerful contribution to American political history. The
Jacksonian Era actually changed the goal of the Founding Fathers to put more power into the presidency rather than in congress. His commitment to
the federal structure, states' rights, and a severely limited central government, all accounted for in his policy of Indian removal are Jackson's greatest
contributions and resulted in the development of modern democracy in the United States.
The founding fathers envisioned and brought to life a system of checks and balances to prevent an over–concentrated power in a central government.
They wanted to preserve and protect American

The Gilded Age And The Age Of Information
The term the "Gilded Age" was coined by Mark Twain. "By this, he meant that the period was glittering on the surface but corrupt underneath." With its
period of extreme economic growth, there was tremendous wealth, but only for the wealthy. The "Second Gilded Age," which some say was brought
on as the Information Age, brings a level of inequality to America that has never been seen before. Experts believe that this shift could kill the
American dream. The Gilded Age and the Age of Information are similar in terms of the vast economic inequality prevalent, the issues arising with
immigration (both reform and influx), and the disparity between the political parties.
Vast economic inequality prevalent
"The United States income inequality has risen drastically since the 1970's and has not been this high since 1928." Economic inequality is the unequal
differences in how assets, wealth, and income are dispersed among the people and different populations throughout the United States. It is often
described as the gap between the rich and the poor.
Wealthy industrialists and financiers such asJohn D. Rockefeller, founder of the Standard Oil Company; Andrew Carnegie, the self–made steel tycoon
and philanthropist; Cornelius Vanderbilt, known for developing the inland water trade and rapidly growing railroad industry after building the New
York Central Railroad; and Jay Gould, a developer of the railroads, were labeled as "robber barons," meaning an American capitalist who became

The Age Of Jackson 's Political History
The Age of Jackson
On particular, The Age of Jackson changed America's political history because Jackson established new precedents with the government's relations
with Indians, the issue of state and federal rights and also established a political rivalry. The Age of Jackson occurred during the time period from
1829 to 1837. During this time period, the United Stated of America was under the presidential term of Andrew Jackson. Ever since Andrew Jackson's
election, there was a complete transformation in the political history of the United States. Before Andrew Jackson, who in which was the 7th president
of the United States, there had only been presidents that did nothing but follow imposes of George Washington. The presidents were John Adams,
Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe and John Quincy Adams. These presidents did not involve themselves with wars that occurred in
Europe, they had no political parties, and they did nothing about the relations with the Indians. They also kept the Bank of America that President
George Washington created. In the other hand Jackson is known for the Trail of Tears, he ended, the Bank of America and initiated a two
–party
political system.
To initiate, one of the reasons that Jackson marked a new age in American political history is the Trial of Tears which occurred from 1831 to 1838.
This event in history was when Jackson relocated the Indians from the east of the Mississippi River to the west. Andrew Jackson believed that it

Emphasizing The True Meaning Of Poems By Andrew Marvell...
Kinsey Jordan
Mrs. Russler
English Honors I
February 4, 2015
"Emphasizing the True Meaning of Poems" Around the seventeenth century the poets Andrew Marvell and John Donne expressed their feelings
through poetry. Both John Donne, born in 1572 and Andrew Marvell, born in 1621 inEngland, are known for their ideas of metaphysical poetry.
Metaphysical poetry is a persuasive poem that uses a conceit. It focuses on imagery, paradoxes, arguments, philosophy and religion.Andrew Marvell's
"To His Coy Mistress" and John Donne's "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning," focus on the theme of love, which was trending at that time. Although
both poems justify the importance and essence of love, the tone differs in each poem making them distant from each other. The figurative language also
makes the two poems different. However, they both focus on the idea of Carpe Diem, enjoying the moment and not worrying about the future. Through
comparing these poems, the differences and similarities result in the true understanding and effectiveness of the poems. In "To His Coy Mistress,"
Andrew Marvell does not perceive true, fervent love, but rather that time and beauty will not last. The tone of this poem is sad, but the author seems to
make it happier. There is an example shown in the first stanza;
"Had we but world enough and time...we would sit down, and think which way to walk, and pass our long love's day." (1–4) Marvell appears to be
straying from the idea of Carpe Diem; stating that if

19th Century 's Famous Industrial Men : Robber Barons Or...
Nineteenth century's famous industrial men:
Robber Barons or Captains of Industry?
By:
Justine Wetten
Advanced U.S. History
Mr. Unis
January 5th, 2015
Discuss whether the industrial leaders of the late nineteenth century are more accurately described as "captains of industry" or "robber barons"?
A. Plan of Investigation
This investigation will assess whether the industrial leaders, such as, Andrew Carnegie, John Pierpont Morgan and John Davison Rockefeller were
perceived as captains of industry or robber barons. In order to evaluate this claim, the investigation will analyze their major contributions to American
Society; how they treated their workers in the factory; and why people questioned their honesty because of the techniques they used to eliminate their
competitors. Mostly secondary sources were used, as well as some primary sources. Two of the sources used in this essay are The Robber Barons: The
Great American Capitalists by Matthew Josephson and Wisdom from the Robber Barons: Enduring Business Lessons from Rockefeller, Morgan, and
the First Industrialists by George D. Smith which will be evaluated for their origins, purposes, values, and limitations.
This investigation does not assess any other nineteenth century industrial leaders.
Part B
In 1863, when Andrew Carnegie was 27, he began working for Pennsylvania Railroad, which was considered a small fortune.
Andrew Carnegie moved to

The First Seminole War

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Cynthia Lamarche

More from Cynthia Lamarche (11)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The First Seminole War