Literary Analysis Of Revelation By Flannery OConnor

Literary Analysis Of Revelation By Flannery OConnor
Revelation
Among many diseases, judgment is an epidemic virus within the human mind; more dangerously with the lack of discernment can create a toxic
atmosphere and such intoxication is highlighted within the short story, Revelation, by Flannery O'Connor. The story is set in the south, and revolves
around an irrational yet religious character, name Mrs. Turpin, who overlooks her own flaws to cast judgments on others. The author uses language,
irony, and archetypes within the story to present that judgement is a form of unconscious self deception that causes hypocritical behavior and
ultimately self agitation. The author demonstrates this by having the characters cast judgment upon each other, which makes the act of passing
judgment on to others an infectious disease fed by society.
The usage of informal language in the beginning of the story, produces transparent characters by exposing their flaws through their speech. Opening
with the reckless announcement addressed by Mrs.Turpin, "I wish I could reduce"(3). in front of strangers had marked her hasty character. This
early exposure of her flaw notes the tragedy of her character for being quick to speak, quick to conclude and quick to judge. As Mrs.Turpin begins to
build judgment upon others from "Girl Scout Shoes" to "bedroom slippers" as she "expects"(5) Mrs.Turpin becomes a false believer, drowning within
her own deceptive conclusion by gripping onto her theory of goodness being carried by people's shoes. Ultimately,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

David Hume and His Thoughts Essay
David Hume and His Thoughts
Hume begins his argument by observing that there is "a great variety of taste, as well as of opinions, which prevails the world." This diversity is
found among people of the same background and culture within the same group and is even more pronounced among "distance nations and remote
ages." A "standard of taste" would provide a definite way to reconcile this diversity. By taste, Hume refers to impressions or emotional responses
associated with beauty and ugliness. Each person perceives beauty differently or, in other words, "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder." Hume then
starts to outline this thesis. Sentiments are subjective and can neither be right or ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Beauty, however, exists in the minds of the individuals contemplating it and thus each individual perceives beauty differently.
3. 5 Principles of Taste of the Ideal Critic
The Ideal Critic possesses delicacy of taste, practice, unprejudiced mind, ability to engage in comparison, and overall good sense. Hume defines
"delicacy of taste" as thus: "where the organs are so fine, as to allow nothing to escape them, and at the same time so exact as to perceive every
ingredient in the composition." He then uses the story of the two kinsmen from Don Quixote to illustrate this concept. The main point of this story is
that some individuals are more sensitive to subtle differences in an artwork and that delicacy of taste is required to make a judgment. The ideal critic
can improve their "delicacy of taste" through practice and comparison. In order to do so, the critic must free the mind from prejudice by being a
disinterested observer. The last attribute of an ideal critic is good sense, which means the ideal critic must be intelligent and rational.
4. Characteristics that Account for Differences in Taste
Hume identifies two characteristics that may account for the differences of taste: "the different humors of men" and "particular manners and opinions
of our age and country." Maturity, character, position, and culture are unavoidable influences on the judgments

Book Review Of The Book Blink The Power Of Thinking
The name of the book I read is, "Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking". This book is written by Malcolm Gladwell and was published
on April 5, 2005. Gladwell is known as out of the one hundred most influential people to New York's, "Time Magazine." Gladwell is a New York
journalist and author. Authoring four books that made an appearance on New York Times bestsellers list, these books were, "The Tipping Point: How
Little Things Make a Big Difference" (2000), "Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking" (2005), "Outliers: The Story of Success" (2008), and
"What the Dog Saw: And Other Adventures" (2009). All of the works he has created touch a great deal on subjects such aspsychology, social
psychology, developmental psychology, sociology, and relationships between people. I obtained this book from an app called, Audible, where I listened
to Gladwell narrates the book himself.
"My book, Blink, is a book that's about snap judgments and it's about taking snap judgments seriously. And it's not a book that says they're great
and it's not a book that says they're terrible. It's a book that says they are both. It can be really good and it can be really bad. And we need to
understand them on a very much more sophisticated level if we were to construct a better world for ourselves." (Malcolm Gladwell, On Books Podcast)
This was a quick explanation of what the book is about from his professional point of view. In my explanation of the book, Blink is a book about snap

Frankenstein, By Mary Shelley
In Frankenstein, nature and anatomy are linked, and through an innate reaction, these differences are rejected. Despite the monster language skills,
passion, and cognizance, society rejects him due to his ugly form. Several differences between Frankenstein and his monstrous creation exits, but at the
same time parallels do. However, Victor is accepted by the society and the monster is rejected. Victor's and the monster's problematic childhood, both
result in their mutual destruction. The idea of conforming to the society that rejects him seems unfit. The monster, in particular, is an outcast from
society, and the reader empathizes with his subsequent rage of being outcast. His isolation allows for the realization that an "increase of knowledge
only discovered to [him] more clearly what a wretched outcast" he is (Shelley 145). Even though the novel Frankenstein focuses on the cultural
struggles of society during Shelley's lifetime, the Enlightenment, an intellectual movement during the time of the novel, focuses on trying to question
our own perceptions, whether it be accepting an idea or a person or a monster that is "shunned and hated by all mankind"; the ideas of the
Enlightenment fail to reflect on the society of Frankenstein (156). After looking at the monster, people come to an instant realization about his internal
qualities. Although judgment of internal qualities is believed to be based off those qualities, the judgment of external appearance masks the judgment of

Implicit Theories And Their Role Of Judgments And...
1.Author(s) of the Article:
Carol S. Dweck , Chi–yue Chiu , and ying–yi Hong
2.Title of the Article:
Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions : A world from two perspectives.
3.Purpose and/or Hypothesis(es) of the Study:
Examine the of the implicit beliefs on people inferences , judgments, and reactions.
4.Results of the Study:
For (hong and dweck) for the failure condition entity theorists " response times to the ability adjectives differed significantly from those of incremental
theory" also results showed that the difference wasn't due to generalized feeling of failure among the entity theorists group.results from ( bandura and
dweck , dweck and Leggettshowed that that those who chose the performance goal tasks are mostly the entity intelligence theory holders also it showed
that entity intelligence theory holders focused on the achievement situation. Results showed (henderson and dweck) study "that entity theorists who
received low grades in the 6th grade tended to receive low grades in the 7th grade who received high in the past tend to receive high in the 7th " while
the opposite was true for the incremental theory they showed improvement also entity theorist showed more anxious attiude toward their school work
nd the results showed for zhao and dweck study that " entity theorists of intelligence were more likelygenerate responses reflecting strong neagative
effect and helpless copying reactions".in the judgement of others and reactions

Analysis on The Rush from Non-Judgment by Theordore...
In the article "The Rush from Judgement," Theordore Dalrymple argues that refraining from making judgements creates an unhealthy society.
Judgements are usually evaluations of certain behaviors or ideas. Dalrmple believes that those who refrain from making judgments practice self
deception. Self deception is the generally defined as the practice of deceiving oneself, which in turn hinders us from attaining self knowledge. The
number one problem associated with self deception is that it has the capability of creating moral dilemmas, such that people use it as a "prophylactic
against leaning from experience," according to Dalrymple. Because one knowingly deceives oneself into believing something even in the face of strong
evidence to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this one case alone we can track this incidence from the mother all the way to the role society played. First, the patient had three children from
three different fathers, all of whom did not provide any support for her. The first father could have been written off as badjudgment, but to attempt to
write off three would be an injustice to her. It is evident due to some emotional attachment to the idea of not wanting to be alone she was able to
rationalize her decisions based on that concept. Because of self deception she refused to even entertain the thought of whether these man had any
qualities that would make good fathers. Had she not refrained from making judgement on these man father the first father she would have been
able to recognize the signs that this man might not make a good father in a nutshell she would have been able to learn from her prior mistakes.
However, father she decides to better herself and her children we see society impede this improvement. After she is hospitalized, Social Services
sent the two year old to live with his father whose daily routine consisted of a life of "drinking, whoring and fighting." Enlight of all the evidence
pointing to a bad home situation Social Services stated "it was wrong to pass judgement on a man like this." The contradiction however is shown after
the father and his girlfriend kill the two year old and as a result

Feb 10 Hamilton Case
MEMO
This memo is regarding Hamilton Corporation and the fraud that occurred. When people make decisions they don't always do it with the right mindset.
There are limitations in our judgment processes and we can identify methods to mitigate bias and improve judgment (KPMG Judgment Framework).
The four common tendencies that cause limitations in our judgment processes are, availability, confirmation, overconfidence, and anchoring. In this
memo I will explain each of the four tendencies, talk about which tendency I believe to have manifested in the Hamilton case, clarify issues relating to
auditing the warranty reserve and describe the alternatives that should be considered in auditing the warranty reserve, and finally provide factors that ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Background on Hamilton
Hamilton (the Company) was a subsidiary of Motor Company (MC). In 1999 the Company spun off from MC and incorporated. After the separation
MC informed the Company that they owed $350–$800 million in warranty claims related to sales that occurred prior to the separation in 1999.
Hamilton's management believed that any warranty claims related to sales prior to the separation should be limited to the reserve amount that was
agreed upon separation. MC wanted the full payment for what they owed relating to warranty claims. MC remained Hamilton's largest client and
because of that, Hamilton's management was motivated to find a solution that would appease MC. Management realized that in paying anything over
$100 million to MC would cause a significant reduction in operating income. For this reason, management had significant incentives to mask the true
level of warranty expense in order to meet analysts' forecasts. Management made the decision to report favorable results, no matter what.
The tendencies or bias manifested in Hamilton Corporation
Hamilton's auditor employed multiple tendencies. Confirmation was used in the scheme to support management when they obtained a letter from the
Company's actuary that provided the "reasonable range" for pension assumptions that had been made in the past. Management also convinced MC to
allow the meeting minutes between the two companies to

Case Analysis : Richard Diaz And Charles Logan
INTRODUCTION
Defendants, RICHARD DIAZ and CHARLES LOGAN, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, move for Summary Judgment on Defendant's liability under a civil action using 42 U.S.C. В§ 1983, alleging that Defendants, former
correctional officers, engaged in nonconsensual sexual conduct with Plaintiff, an inmate, depriving her of her right under the Eighth Amendment of the
Constitution to remain free from cruel and unusual punishment. In further support of this Summary Judgment requesting that Plaintiff's request for
relief be denied, the Defendants respectfully refer the Court to this Memorandum. As grounds therefore, Defendants state the following:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Tr. Letts. Diaz 1:4–6, Apr. 17, 2016; 1:17–18, May 10, 2016; 1:23–24, May 21, 2016.)
On August 29, 2016, Plaintiff was moved to isolated confinement after being involved in a fight. (Compl. 2:24–26.) The next day, while Defendant
Logan was monitoring the isolated confinement wing, Plaintiff invited him to join her in her cell for, as she put it, "a bit of fun in this boring place."
(Logan Aff. 1:9–12.) Upon entering the Plaintiff's cell solely at her request, Defendant Logan and Plaintiff engaged in consensual sexual intercourse.
(Logan Aff. 1:13–14.) On two occasions following this encounter, Plaintiff again requested that Defendant Logan enter her cell where they engaged in
consensual sexual intercourse. (Logan Aff. 1:15–17.) These encounters were the only sexual encounters between Plaintiff and Defendant Logan, each
of which was at the Plaintiff's request. (Logan Aff. 1:18–19.) No special treatment was provided to Plaintiff. (Logan Aff. 1:20–21.)
On September 13, 2016, Plaintiff reported both relationships to the superintendent of the Correctional Facility and supervisor of the Defendants.
(Compl. 3:5–7.) Plaintiff has filed a civil action under 42 U.S.C. В§ 1983 alleging that the sexual conduct between Plaintiff and Defendants was not
consensual in nature, because an inmate cannot, as a matter of law, consent to sexual

Judgment In Puppy And Sonny's Blues
So Judgmental
In the world today it takes 5 seconds for a person to judge someone. That quick 5 second judgment will stay in a person's brain forever. In the short
story "Puppy" and "Sonny's Blues" Judgment plays a prominent role in how the stories playout. In this essay I will show you the ways that judgment
come into play, the similarities in between characters, and how moving past judgment can affect the outcome.
In Sonny's Blues the narrator and in Puppy the main character Marie presents many similarities including judgement against other characters. In
Sonny's Blues the narrator is displaying his judgment towards his brother Sonny. For example, the narrator keeps his brother at arms length and does
not think it is possible for Sonny to ever change his ways. The narrator is very skeptical of his brother's life. Just like in the Puppy the main character
Marie emphasizes her dislike against Callie's parenting skills. One example would be, when Marie refuses to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Sonny at first does not know how to handle his emotions, causing him to go on a dark downward spiral of drugs and trouble at an early age. It is
not until later in his life that he lets his emotions come out in a healthy way, through music. The narrator on the other hand deals with his emotions
by boxing them inside of himself, causing him to isolate himself from the world around him. The characters in "Puppy" are very similar also. Both
Marie and Callie come from difficult past and have strange children. Marie's son has violent outburst. She fixes the outburst by having him
constantly play a video game to calm him. Callie's son darts in front of cars while playing outside. Callie feels as if she has solved the issue by putting
her son on a chain that is connected to a tree. Both Marie and Callie love their sons and feel like they are doing what is best for

Examples Of Social Judgment Theory
Heald, J. E. (1991). Social Judgment Theory: Applications to Educational Decision Making. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(3), 343–57.
This study (Heald, 1991) uses social judgment theory, a theory that is supposedly nontraditional to the field of education to improve the ability of
school administrators in identifying more accurately students who are at risk of dropping out of school. The study argues that social judgment theory,
although it is not traditionally utilized in educational decision–making, has significant potential in that area. Particularly, the researchers argue that
social judgment theory offers decision makers (perhaps not just those in educational settings) the opportunity to better understand "the nature of their
intuitions, inferences, and biases and the role they play in their judgments" (p. 355).
Ex post facto data were collected on 120 students who were 7th graders during the 1985–1986 school year. Their records had been randomly chosen
from rural, urban, and suburban school districts in Atlanta, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An odered alternatives scale was created to assess the three latitudes with regard to the believability of various percentages of students who drink at
most five drinks at social gatherings. Nine questions were given as alternatives. Following the survey, an intensive social norms campaign that began
the previous year was resumed to reduce high–risk alcohol consumption on campus. Posters with several different messages of the statistics of alcohol
consumption were displayed and widely distributed around campus. In the spring of the following year, another survey was conducted to display
reproductions of the campaign messages and measured the amount of exposure the students had to the messages in the last three

Theme Of Revelation By Flannery O Connor
Flannery O'Connor was a Southern Gothic writer who grew up in Georgia in the mid 20th century. She is known for her short stories and admired
for reflecting her background along with her religious beliefs as a Roman Catholic into her writing. She was affected by lupus at age 26 and only lived
for another 13 years afterwards. Her later stories more heavily reflected her beliefs and her faith, one of which being "Revelation," published the year
she died in 1964. It is about a stereotypical southern woman, Mrs. Turpin, who identifies others by their social class and is caught off guard when a
young educated daughter can no longer ignore her bigotry and attacks her with a textbook. Throughout the rest of the story, Mrs. Turpin is in conflict
with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Turpin's self image. The first of which is the dramatic irony of O'Connor giving the reader insight into the two sides of the main character. She sees
herself as a, "respectable, hard–working, church–going woman," and as the reader we are able to see a very different side (194). This contrast gives the
reader their first insight into the theme of self image. Later on in the waiting room when Mary Grace hurls the book across the room, we see the
theme develop through more irony. The book was titled "Human Development," exactly what Mrs. Turpin needed to develop spiritually. At home,
when in bed with Claud, we see the first instance in which she worries about what others think about her as a consequence of her actions. "She wanted
to tell him... she did not wish to put the image of herself as a wart hog from hell into his mind" (194–195). It's ironic because as her husband, he should
be someone she can come to with problems, but instead, she takes them to the farm help, which just makes her feel worse and further frustrates her.
The last and most significant piece of irony that finalizes Mrs. Turpin's transformation comes in her religious image at the end of the story. Those that
she categorized at, "the bottom of the heap," were transcending into heaven before herself and her husband (181). This is the ultimate wake up call for
her and her understanding of God, judgment, and self–perception. This development of irony happens parallel to Mrs. Turpin's developing
self–perception and judgmental behavior. The irony within the religious image seen at the end, further clears up her faith and spiritual understanding to
restore her

Rosea Lake Judgments Analysis
Allison Braud
September 15th, 2016
WGS 2010.001/Dr. Verner
Rosea Lake's Judgments
Judgements, a photograph captured by Rosea Lake, can be seen as an attempt to address the double standard women face when presenting themselves
to the world. The photo depicts the back of a young woman's leg with her skirt hem slightly lifted. Horizontal markings on the subject's leg are
reminiscent of those on a measuring cup or ruler. The markings on the woman's leg are meant to be length markings, specifically the length of a
woman's garment hem. The horizontal markings don't mark specific length measurements, such as centimeters or inches. Rather, the markings depict
how a sexist mainstream society would react to seeing such skirt lengths on young women. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It's to–the–point, aesthetically pleasing, and brings to light an issue that isn't often discussed in mainstream media. It also disproves a common
antifeminist stereotype that all feminists are hairy, butch man–hatters, because the subject is a slender, hairless, assumingly attractive white women.
However, though I admire the piece and the message it shares, I do find myself disgruntled with it. As a feminist, intersectionality is very important
to me. I love supporting women of all shapes, sizes, races, backgrounds, ages, social status, geographical location, and specific circumstance. Though
the issue of sexual objectification is a problem many women face, this seems like amn issue that's specific to young, middle class women living in
first world countries, specifically America. Additionally, sexual objectification may be perceived differently, and typically more severely, pending on
weight, size, or race. Since the subject is an able–bodied, slender, white women, I'm not sure if I feel like it's showing the most accurate depiction of
your average victim of sexual objectification. Though it may not be the most representative depiction, I can only assume that Lake's intentions were
good when creating this piece of art, and I think she made her point well. I believe that Rosea Lake's Judgements is an important part of feminist
media, and it sets the grounds for further discussion about how else women are treated inferiorly to

Reflection And Discernment
Reflection and Discernment in a Dynamic World
Reflection
Reflection is a careful thought about oneself, one's behaviour and one's beliefs. It means reviewing past experiences and making insights about them.
Reflection is like looking into the mirror and saying what you see. ("Self reflection | Unison", 2017)
It is necessary, because it encourages personal growth. Reflection helps identify our mistakes and how we can improve on them in the future. It also
strengthens a person's emotional intelligence and self–regulation, because during self–reflection, you have the opportunity of checking your strengths,
weaknesses, values, and goals and to also check your impact on the people around you. Self–regulation involves being able to correct oneself and adapt
to changing situations. This is the building of a successful life. Reflection enables one to act with Integrity. This occurs as a result of conscious effort,
reviewing all the actions made and decisions taken and comparing them to the values you hold in esteem would help you monitor and control yourself
and slowly help you become a person of integrity. Over time, reviewing and reflecting on your past will help you solidify the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
If you have a friend that is known to be very loud and restless person, you know not to make that person you study partner, because your goal of
achieving an "A" may not be achieved. "A person who is negative, puts people down, and carries around anger all the time has bad energy– we choose
not to spend time with them because it's simply not healthy for us. We don't have to tell other people "that's a bad person". We know they aren't good
for us and it will become self–evident for others who use their discernment. [Discernment] gives us clear perception and the ability to make good
choices without having to be better or worse than anyone else." (Habash,

Illusory Causation Essay
Extensive research has shown the causes of false confessions can be attributed to a phenomenon known as illusory–causation. Illusory–causation is a
phenomenon which happens when, "people attribute unwarranted causality to a stimulus simply because it is more noticeable or salient than other
available stimuli." (Lassiter, 2002) Illusory–causation phenomenon can be seen most notable on how people evaluate legal evidence leading to
prejudicial effects. (Lassiter, 2002) Evidence such as, videotaped confessions camera perspectives can vastly influence the jurors judgment. Videotaped
confessions are most commonly recorded with the camera focused on the suspect this in turn leads mock juror to judge that the confessions were more
voluntary and most likely make them guilty. (Lassiter, 2002)Furthermore, integration techniques also play a role in false confessions such as
non–assaultive psychology manipulation. (ct. Kassin & Kichel, 1996),cited in (Lassiter,2002). In a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Lassiter, 2002) The researches made up mock confessions and used elements found in real interrogations. Stage one was split up to eight experiments
with five being conducted in 5 minutes. The remaining three was more developed using actual police interrogation transcripts lasting 30 minutes. They
found that videotaped recording focused on the suspect did in fact caused the confessions to appear more voluntary. The biasing effect of
camera–perspective showed that it influenced judgment of voluntariness, but also effects the likelihood of guilt and sentencing of the suspect.
(Lassiter, 2002) They also found the sentencing for the suspects were more sever. Furthermore, Lassiter (2002) asked the mock jurors to only focus on
the content of the confession and not on how the confession was presented. However, the jurors still experienced the prejudicial effect of camera

The Importance Of Body Image
Body image has always been a significant issue in society. However, the judgements associated with the topic of body image, specifically about one's
physical appearance, provoke us to think about the factors that may lead to one's body being judged. Many of the viewpoints on this matter are
divided into two categories: the first one being the body itself of the individual, and the second one being the character inside the body. Taking into
consideration of the viewpoints stated above, it is clear that judgments do not grow from one's body itself, rather from the character traits possessed
within or linked to the individual's body.
Body image has been around for several years. Although the ideal body image expectations set out in society ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
In other words, I always search for the brand name/label on their clothing to classify their status and belonging in society. To illustrate, certain brand
names such as; Nike, Adidas, Roots, TNA, Brandy Melvin, Polo, Top shop and much more, all show signs of wealth and trendy fashion. Thus, if I
were to spot an induvial wearing clothing from an expensive brand like such, I automatically consider them to be athletic/sporty based on their attire
type, wealthy and/or fashionable in a sense. Similarly, looking at an individual's dressing also says a lot about them, for example, recalling from my
past experience, I remember being labelled fat and unattractive in elementary school, because of my tomboy dressing style. On the whole, there are
many factors that come into play when one is being judged, although, based these points we can say that one's body itself does not construct judgment.
Body image only refers to one's physical structure, shape, size or height, which in other terms, merely represents the outer persona of an individual.
For this reason, when some individual judges another based on their body type, body language or dressing style they are not merely judging the
individual's physical structure or body type itself, but also their appearance and other traits. With this in mind, if we compare body image itself with
appearance, the two attributes are very similar, yet so different. Being that, appearance describes one's facial features which

The Elevator William Sleator
Of all the battles young Martin faces from William Sleator's "The Elevator", a reader can grasp one of the greatest and most important themes to fit
this story. When Martin and his dad move into an apartment, Martin is apprehensive about it because of the fact that the place is old and practically
falling apart. For one, Martin is afraid of elevators, and he has to use an old one everyday. To top it off, he has to ride the old thing with a
mysterious, creepy, fat lady. Once Martin's situation gets to the point of being unbearable, he confronts his dad telling him about the creepy lady on
the elevator. Martin's dad is the exact opposite of how a father should be. Martin's dad insults him whenever he looks to him for help. Also, Martin
doesn't... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, this fails to account for Martin's dad's and the lady on the elevator's actions because for one, Martin's dad continuously, non–stop insults his
own son, making him feel like a disappointment. If one was to be treated like that by their own father, one would also think that they would be hurt
or affected in some way. Martin is not acting irrational or making a big deal of his situation, if anything, he reacted normally. Like I said before, in
the story after Martin goes to his dad seeking for help, his dad starts insulting him and calling him names, what does one think he should do at twelve
when you look to your father because you have no mother and all his dad does is insult him? Therefore Martin is doing well in his situation because he
tries not to cry as the story says, he only cries when his situation is unbearable which is appropriate in this situation.
In conclusion, William Sleator uses many different craft moves to lead to the theme. Sleator uses thoughtshots, foreshadowing,irony, and tension to
lead readers to infer that the theme of the story is in order to thrive in life, you cannot let other's judgement's change you or the way you think. Martin
learns the hard way because he allows his dad, bullies at school, and the lady on the elevator affect him, and then ironically his worst fear becomes a

Negative Review
We hypothesized that a negative first impression would resonate with participants more so than negative review placed somewhere else in an
evaluation, and therefore would produce a higher desire to avoid taking a class with the professor. We also hypothesized that female professors would
generally be less desired, as well as be more intensely impacted by a negative impression than male professors would. We found no significance in
effect of gender on the likelihood someone will take a class with a professor, both independently and paired with the position of a negative review.
We did, however, find that there was a large main effect for the position of a negative review for both genders. It was surprising to find to the main
effect of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As expected from our literature search, at least in terms of professor evaluations, like judgments of hazardous driving, the primacy effect overpowered
the recency effect. It can be hypothesized, then, based off of our findings, that at least in terms of evaluations and character judgment, the primacy effect
is more significant than the recency effect. There are numerous ways to justify this claim, including looking back to the research of Hennessy et al.
The researchers claim that perhaps their finding of an overpowering primacy effect can be a result of the lack of need to make a continual judgment.
The participants of both the Hennessy et al. study as well as our study were put into circumstances where there was no pressure and low cost to make a
judgment right from the start and not evaluate it later. Hennessy et al. also suggests that in cases of judgment the primacy effect is powerful in that
participants use the first impression as a basis of understanding and then look for support for their original impression throughout the rest of the
information presented, providing a biased view of the subject under

Passing Judgment In Mrs. Turpin's Revelation
When is passing judgment on others wrong? If we keep it to ourselves and do not speak it aloud, is this okay? All humans judge each other, that is
one of our unconscious past times, we do it without thought to the consequences. We put ourselves in others positions and think we can do better, just
as Mrs. Turpin does, in the story Revelation "what if Jesus had said, "All right you can be white–trash or a nigger or ugly!"(300). Mrs. Turpin prides
herself on having good qualities and is sure she would be respectable even if she were black. As we start our day, we try to find something to wear.
Immediately, we are worried about what people will think if we wear those pants that are a little tight, or the skirt that is a little young for us,... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Turpin did. Somehow, we have to right the wrong, and clear our conscience, come to grips with it and learn to live with how we are, or change.
Mrs. Turpin was one of the lucky ones; she saw a vision in the sky, which helped clear things up for her. "A visionary light settled in her eyes, she
saw the streak as vast swinging bridge extending upward from the earth through a field of living fire: upon it a vast horde of souls were rumbling
towards heaven. There were whole companies of white trash, clean for the first time in their lives, and bands of black niggers in white robes and
battalions of freaks and lunatics shouting, clapping, and leaping like frogs. And bringing up the end of the procession was a tribe of people whom
she recognized at once as those who, like herself and Claud, had always had a little of everything and the God–given wit to use it right. She leaned
forward to observe them closer. They were marching behind the others, with great dignity; accountable as they had always been for good order and
common sense. They alone were on key" (331). "Yet she could see by their shocked and altered faces that even their virtues were being burned away"
(332). Ultimately, Mrs. Turpin was shown that no matter what she thought of herself or how she judged others, God makes his own decisions and in
the end, it may surprise us all, just as it did Mrs.

Judgment in Peter Shaffer's Equus and Albert Camus' The...
Personal judgment in Peter Shaffer's Equus and Albert Camus' The Stranger, though internal in the first and external in the latter, mirrors society's
judgment of those who differ from the norm. The two postmodernist authors both use judgment as a tool to promote the postmodern idea that society
oppresses and criticizes people who are not like everyone else. Camus and Shaffer place specific motifs and elements into their novels in order to push
the idea of societal judgment on the reader. However, while the ideas may be the same, Camus and Shaffer use them contrastingly. Shaffer tends to use
judgment of the self while Camus leans towards judgment of others, but the judgment ultimately leads back to people who do not conform to the norm.
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The combination of the setting of a trial, the inspection of Meursault, and the anonymity of the jurors leads to an unmistakable sense of external
evaluation and consequently societal judgment in The Stranger. Camus and Shaffer use these physical elements in their works in order to permeate
both texts with a sense of societal criticism. Shaffer and Camus pass judgment on Dysart and Meursault through their lack and removal of passion.
In Equus, Dysart specifically mentions the lack of passion in himself. When speaking to Hesther, Dysart criticizes himself for his fake love for the
wild and primitive. He states, "I settled for being pallid and provincial, out of my own eternal timidity" (2.25). This statement, just a small part of the
entire rant against himself, is opposed by Hesther. Dysart, as a psychiatrist, tries to remove emotion and individuality from his patients, specifically
Alan. Unlike Hesther, who sees psychiatry as removing pain, Dysart judges himself for becoming a person who removes uniqueness. Alan contains too
much emotion to ever be considered normal and as the play continues Dysart becomes more and more opposed to 'fixing' him. Dysart's specific
speeches about how he hates himself for becoming impassionate and removing the passion in his patients contrast with society's normal views. These
rants, because they are in

Social Judgment Theory Essay
Abstract
The best theory to addresses how people's attitudes change as situations and involvement change is social judgment theory. A review of the literature on
social judgment theory (SJT) improves understanding of one's own judgment process and of one's work, marital and interpersonal relationship. The
social judgment theory of attitude change was first presented by the U.S.–based Turkish psychologist Muzafer Sherif (1906–88) and the U.S.
psychologist Carl I(vor) Hovland (1912–61) in Social Judgment (1961). SJT attempted to explain how attitude change is influenced by judgmental
processes. The focus of SJT was about attitude change on a specific issue that results from judgments on related issues. This study provides insight
literature ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, Carl Hovland died before completing the book Social Judgment in 1961, thus Sherif carried on their study and published the book after
Hovland's death (Sherif & Hovland, 1961). Carolyn W. Sherif, Muzafer Sherif's wife, is one of primary theorist of social judgment theory (Sherif et
al., 1965). Carolyn W. Sherif and Muzafer integrated the social judgment–involvement approach into the study of individual attitude and behavior
within the patterned interaction of such groups in Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment–Involvement Approach (1965), the book in
which the social judgment–involvement theory is detailed.
Fundamental Theoretical Ideas
The focus of SJT is that an attitude change on a specific issue will result from judgments on related issues. Because we cannot observe a person's
attitude using traditional research methods, therefore the social judgment theory was developed (Sherif & Sherif, 1968). Based on Muzafer Sherif and
Carl Hovland's research (1961), they establish the ordered alternative questionnaire to measure the judgments. The questionnaire requires that the
participant rate a list of statements as being acceptable, objectionable, or non–commitment (neither acceptable nor objectionable). An individual's
latitudes of acceptance, rejection, and non–commitment represent an individual's feelings about the topics. According to Sherif et al.

Examples Of Appearance And Judgement In Frankenstein
"Children learn to read around ages five and six when they have to attend school because an education is required by law in the United States. People
have to read when it is required by school, but why do people choose to read? Reading can expand one's intelligence and touch one's emotions when
one ponders over characters, topics, and themes. Thinking about emotional topics can lead people towards common views. When discussing the topic
of appearance and judgment, one common insight that becomes apparent is that looks do not determine one's personality. While it is true that
appearances can foreshadow danger, it seems evident that judgment should come from personal knowledge. The topic of appearance and judgment is
greatly exemplified in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein as it becomes apparent that... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The first incident when the reader witnesses a passage of judgment that is based on one's appearance is when the Frankenstein family adopts
Elizabeth Lavenza. Elizabeth is found living in the streets with a poor Italian family and Caroline Frankenstein adopts Elizabeth because she is a very
pretty girl. Elizabeth's beauty allowed people to judge her as pure and worthy so, despite all the other children in the streets, Elizabeth is given a great
education, a wealthy family, and a beautiful home. On the contrary, when Victor creates his creature, Victor is so horrified by his ugliness that he flees
his apartment. When Victor later returns and finds that the creature is gone, Victor has the audacity to celebrate and call the creature his "enemy". It is
true that in nature, the creature would be a great predator. The creature is great in stature, incredibly fast, incredibly strong, and exceedingly intelligent.
Weaker animals would be smart to run from this animal. However, Frankenstein's creature is not an animal. The creature was comprised of the most
perfect human limbs, organs, and bones that Victor

The Terminator 2 : Judgment Day Directed By James Cameron...
Terminator 2: Judgment Day directed by James Cameron and District 9 directed by Neill Blomkamp, at first glance don't share much similarities
between each other. One is about a terminator, a T–800 to be exact, and a boy named John Connor. District 9 is about aliens and humans having
problems with each other and the point is that if you put closer detail to both of these movies; there is similarity in two themes, war and technology.
The message for both movies in the end is similar if we can connect the way these movies use both war and technology in order to gain our attention.
Lets start off with Terminator 2 and the way it makes us look at war, technology and the message that it brings along. At the start of the movie it shows
us a world of terror, where the terminators have taken over the world and there is only a few remaining humans, one of them being John Connor, the
man destined to lead the resistance against the machines. The fact that the movie shows us a world reduced to rubble is because the humans tried to
advance technology too quickly. The movie only gives us a glimpse of what would transpire if this war were to take place, which in all likeliness the
machines would defeat the humans. They are faster, stronger, they are killing machines. The only problem is that humans were the ones who made
them and this is where technology comes in, a man named Miles Dyson who is the creator of Skynet. Skynet is a big reason behind how the
terminators came to be. For Dyson,

The Court Used The Discerning Observer Test For...
The court used the discerning observer test for substantial similarity, analyzing protectable elements and how those elements were arranged and placed
and the total concept and feel of the quilts. Id. at 273. In particular, the court considered the arrangement and shapes of letters, colors that were chosen
to represent letters and other parts of the quilt, quilting patterns, icons chosen and placement of protectable elements. Id.; See Hogan v. DC Comics, 48
F. Supp. 2d 298 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (reasoning that the comic book and novel were not substantially similar because the similarities were of unprotectable
ideas and themes, in addition to the differences in the total look and feel of the works, the interactions of the characters', and the plots). However, in
Knitwaves, when the plaintiff, a clothing manufacturer claimed that the defendant had copied two sweaters that were created and copyrighted by the
plaintiff, the court ruled that the two sweater designs at issue were substantially similar because the alleged infringed work copied the original
contribution of the copyrighted work. 71 F.3d 996. In addition, the court reasoned that the sole use of Knitwaves ' sweaters as reference materials and
the selection, coordination and arrangement of patterns was enough to constitute copyright infringement. Id. at 1004.
Copyright protection does not extend to scenes a faire, which are stock themes commonly linked to a particular genre or characteristics that appear in a
work of

The American Dream
America has always been considered a melting pot. Today, it is filled with people of many different backgrounds and is more diverse than ever
before. Mostly all of these people are in search of a better life or strive to accomplish "The American Dream". Although, there is an underlying factor
that restricts these dreams from becoming a reality. In society,mainstream today requires people to be and act like the "ideal American" to fully
succeed in this world. There is a bias in society that if someone does not fit the perfect description of an American they will not be the best at any job
or goal they want to achieve. The mainstream that is active in America today has created norms that people must fulfill in order to have a fair chance
at succeeding. In Sherry Turkle's passage "The Flight From Conversation" she elaborates on how technology distracts us from living a full life and
working toward personal goals. This passage relates to In "Covering: Hidden Assault on Our Civil Rights" by Kenji Yoshinobecause he explains how
mainstream pressures people to be someone they aren't, which also distracts them from their personal goals because they have a new role to fill. He
explains how the mainstream today as forced people to cover up stigmas to be presented as normal and how assimilation has never been lost in
American society, even when culture had shifted to "celebrate diversity". Defining others has become a routine to ultimately decide if a person can
succeed in this world

The Case Of Pedigo V.
In the case of Pedigo v. P.A.M. Transp., 891 F. Supp. 482, 485 (W.D. Ark. 1994), rev 'g, 60 F.3d 1300 (8th Cir. 1995), "The court advised that the
ADA as it was being interpreted had the potential of being the greatest generator of litigation ever. Also, that the court doubted whether Congress, in its
wildest dreams or wildest nightmares, intended to turn every garden–variety worker 's compensation claim into a federal case. Based on statistical data
from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), from the time the Americans with Disabilities Act on July 26, 1992, enacted to FY
1996, 71,977 individuals had filed disability charges . From FY 1997 to FY 2015, 376,658 individuals had filed disability charges . Reviewing the...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is also possible that plaintiff lawyers simply do not yet fully understand the legal requirements of the ADA. To the extent that cases lose because of
the distinctive features of the ADA–like the reasonable accommodation requirement and the definition of disability. My analysis of appellate decisions
under the ADA suggests that defendants are much more likely than plaintiffs to prevail in appellate litigation are .
In a summary judgment case, a person with a qualifying disability is the first step, along with the threshold step for plaintiffs in making the prima facie
case of discrimination requisite. There are two elements of the plaintiff's prima facie case (in the absence of direct evidence of discrimination) are that
the plaintiff was qualified for the position, with or without accommodations, and that the plaintiff experienced the adverse action as a result of
disability . It is also, found that the elements of the prima facie case may be more difficult to dismiss on motions for summary judgment, as they likely
involve disputed claims about the facts.
In the empirical study by Beford in 2013 , one assumption is that the ADAAA will result in fewer summary judgment rulings finding that claimants
lack standing as covered individuals with a disability. This study examines all reported federal court summary judgment decisions arising under Title I
of the ADA for a forty–month period extending from

Judging To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee
Judgment has become part of everyday life, something you need to get used to. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee a historical fiction. Whether it
was Scout, Jem or, any of the Maycomb citizens they always had judge everybody and anybody that came in there sight. Being even racist against the
black happen every day, judging them by their looks and skin color was the ways many people in Maycomb function. Throughout the novel the
characters judge each other though first impressions, social class and behavior. Social class judgment has occurs in the story many in the story many of
times. One example would be when Jem judges Maycomb citizens by who they like and do not like. "The thing about it is, our kinds of folks don't
like the Cunninghams, the Cunnighams don't like the Ewells, and the Ewells hate and despise the colored folks." (258). Social class was being
judged here and that is one of many social class judgment in this story by the characters. Another social class judgment would be when Miss Caroline
was being judged on her wealth and her looks by Scout. "Miss Caroline was no more than twenty one. She had bright auburn–hair, pink cheek, and
wore crimson fingernail polish." (18). Scout judges on the way Miss Caroline looks and the ways she looks shows her wealth. There was also
another social class judgment in the book when the trial was starting and the colored folks have to sit in the balcony. "The colored balcony ran along
three walls of the courtroom..." (186–187).

I Can 't Determine First Time I Ever Felt Shame
I can't determine first time I ever felt shame, nor am I certain that I want to remember. The thought of even discussing shame makes me feel quite
vulnerable and uncomfortable, but, upon deeper reflection, I can conclude that shame has almost always been an integral part of my character. This
same reflection also causes my mind to race towards the "p" word: perfection. Dr. BrenГ© Brown stated in her lecture that this attitude of feeling
shame from an inability to reach an ideal existence is commonly found in women, but it is in this manner that I feel I most commonly interact with
shame (www.ted.com). To make matters worse, I have consistently bottled this shame up within myself and have not communicated or acknowledged
its existence. By so doing I have allowed shame to flourish within me. Dr. Brown added that shame, "needs three things to grow exponentially:
secrecy, silence, and judgment." Without knowing it, I have been effectively growing my own shame over the past twenty years. I personally desire to
kill shame at its very roots in my mind now that its existence has been made known. Examining perfection could be the place to begin my quest to
eliminate shame. Perfection for me has presented itself as a persistent need to properly meet or surpass expectations. There are always expectations that
a person must live up to, and they may come from internal or external sources. These expectations can vary between cultures, but they are always
present. I have realized that I

How Should One Face Death Be Controlled By Humans
According to Epictetus, how should one face death – both one's own death
and the death of people close to you? Compare and contrast this attitude
with the attitude of another figure we have studied in the course (e.g., Hector,
Achilles, Antigone, Socrates). Do you accept either of these attitudes? Why
In his handbook, Epictetus asserts that the gods created a perfectly just universe. Humans must align their beliefs with the wills of the gods and
acquiesce to whatever happens in the world. In order to live a life of equanimity, Epictetus believes that people must understand that life is a fragile
and temporary gift from the gods and that death must be recognized as inevitable. In the Iliad, Hector and Achilles' attitudes to death ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Epictetus affirms that people must trust the gods' judgment in establishing a well and just universe. People must understand that death, like the rest
of the universe's events, is a deliberate element of the gods' world. Therefore, people "should want [events] to happen as they do happen, and [their]
life will go well" (Epictetus, 13). When people shape their perception of death in accordance with the gods' wills, they are able to maintain
equanimity. On the other hand, Epictetus argues, "If [people] are averse to illness or death or poverty, [they] will meet misfortune. So [people must]
detach [their] aversion from everything not up to [them] (Epictetus, 12). People must not dwell on uncontrollable courses of events, like death, because
it places their wills in opposition to the will of the gods, resulting in suffering. However, when people accept that death is an intentional aspect of the
gods' immaculate set up of the universe, they bring their wills in agreement with the gods' wills and may live with composure.
In addition, Epictetus argues that people must remember that human life in the gods' well and just universe is a transitory gift from the gods, which
justifies its preordained revocation–death. In other words, as long as life is given to humans by the gods, people must "take care of it as something
that is not [their] own, just as

Judgement In The Crucible
Judgement. We all do it, every day. We make decisions based on certain factors of a person. In the Crucible, a group of girls tell lies and act
be–switched to accuse people they dislike. They act as if the convicted are Satan followers, knowing that the highly religious villagers would do
anything to rid of evil. It goes hand in hand with judgment, we see something or hear something we don't like, and automatically have a whole idea
about that person. Judgement is always present. Day to day can see at least one person, or maybe even yourself=ves, making decisions or judgments
purely based on say, religion, gender, race, sexual orientations, and so on and so forth.
The accusations of today's world are just like the ones from the groups of the girls we see in the Crucible. Everything in the Puritan society of the
Crucible has to do with religious intolerance and bigotry. As soon as John Proctor admitted to adultery, people had a change of hearts for the
convicted, but it all changed with what followed. Because adultery was seen as being of the devil, he was risking everything. As seen in the Crucible,
the black servant, Tituba was automatically thought to have to do with the witch crafting because of her cultural background and ethnicity, which made
it easier for the girls to accuse her and have her thrown into jail. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
You can see women wearing hijabs, and some people rudely assert that they are terrorists and, not actual people! In fact, as an example of religious
discrimination wearing hijabs in some countries is illegal. It is very unfair that just because someone looks or dresses a certain way means that people
can automatically assume things. The people of today no doubt need to change that. Judgement has been with people throughout history, and it indeed
does shape the way things turn out or have turned

How to Start a Child Support Recovery Business
HOW TO START A CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT RECOVERY BUSINESS
From Your Kitchen Table
By
Phyllis M. Croswell
Judgment Specialist
HOW TO START A CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT RECOVERY BUSINESS
From Your Kitchen Table
Book Four of The Kitchen Table Office Series
Copyright February, 2008 By Phyllis M. Croswell & MELENDEZ PUBLISHING Providing Work At Home Solutions ISBN 978
–0–9794887–0–2
DISCLAIMER
This booklet is a product of my own past experience in the judgment recovery industry. This manual only contains my own personal tips and proven
methods based on years of experience as a judgment recovery specialist. While this material is designed to assist you in the recovery of court awarded
judgments, we do not present this material as legal advise. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
You don't need to meet your clients face to face. Everything can be done by mail, fax, or email. The occasional trip to the records department in
your local courthouse is your only venture outdoors. You do not need any type of license to do this type of work. What exactly is JUDICIAL
JUDGMENT RECOVERY? First let's call it JJR for short. Then let's break it down one word at a time. 2
A) JUDICIAL means (in this case) "a legal court of law". B) JUDGMENT means "the determination of the court", a legal obligation as determined
by the judge. C) RECOVERY means "the act of becoming lost). If you know what a court order is then you already have a good idea. A court order
is pretty much a judicial judgment in that they both mean, in essence, "As Ordered By The Court". So what does it mean to us? It means that when one

person (the plaintiff), sues another person (the defendant), in small claims court, and wins, it's because the "court ordered" the defendant, now known
as the judgment debtor, to pay the plaintiff, usually, a said dollar amount. So now the plaintiff is awarded a piece of paper proclaiming them a
judgment winner. But are they really the winner? The easy part was winning the case. Now comes the difficult part, and that is getting the judgment
debtor to actually pay–up. You see, the court cannot collect the money for the judgment winners. It is actually up to the judgment winners to collect
their own judgments. But with no pressure to

Malicious Prosecution Essay
I.
The cases discussed below seem to agree on the four main elements of malicious prosecution: (1) termination of earlier suit in the plaintiff's favor,
(2) lack of probable cause for the suit, (3) malice on the defendant's part, and (4) special injury flowing from the earlier suit. Frey v. Stoneman, 722
P. 2d 274, 277 (Ariz. 1986); Young v. Motor City Apartments, 133 Mich. App. 671, 675, 350 N.W.2d 790, 792 (1984). Elements (2) and (3) are
satisfied in our client's case: the earlier suit lacked probable cause; and the suit was presumably malicious because the lienholder's only motive was to
put her out of business. Element (1) is dicussed under Issue I and element (4) is discussed under Issue II below.
Can a plaintiff sue satisfying ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The court also stated that when a suit is terminated in a way that indicates the accused was innocent of wrongdoing it constitutes a favorable
termination and that "...Termination prior to trial on the merits is favorable if it "reflects on the merits of the matter" Frey, 722 P.2d at 279 (quoting
Minasian v. Sapse, 80 Cal.App.3d at 827, 145 Cal.Rptr. at 832). This would require trying a case within a case to determine the outcome. The final
decision on what is a favorable termination is decided by the judge and any vagueness surrounding the termination of the prior proceedings is
determined by the factfinder. Since the court determined there were genuine issues of material fact with respect to the details regarding the termination
of the prior proceedings due to: (1) the confusing nature of the termination, and (2) the conflicting judgments entered, the case was remanded to resolve
these issues.
Colli and Frey are similar in the sense that both cases are trying to determine whether the circumstances surrounding the termination of the prior
proceedings can satsify element (1) requiring that they end in the plaintiffs favor through voluntary dismissals. Colli has to do with satisfying the
requirement through a voluntary dismissal without any debate; while Frey has been prosecuted as though it was through a

Essay on Reflexive Transparency, Mental Content, and...
Reflexive Transparency, Mental Content, and Externalism
It has been disputed whether an externalist conception of the individuation of intentional states, such as beliefs and desires, is compatible with
self–knowledge, that is, the claim that one's judgments about one's intentional states are non–evidential, non–inferential, and authoritative. I want to
argue that these theses are indeed incompatible, notwithstanding an important objection to this incompatibility claim. The worry has been raised that if
externalism is true, then for a subject to know, say, that he or she believes that p, the subject would need to know, on the basis of some evidence, the
external conditions which determine the belief's content. Thus, externalism would be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
And thus externalism would be incompatible with self–knowledge. But many philosophers have accepted an objection suggesting that this worry is
mistaken, because even if one's belief content is externally determined, one need not know the external conditions determining that content in order to
have the belief. And, thus, the subject's reflexive judgment about the belief would not need to rest on evidence about those external conditions.(2) But
this objection rests, in turn, on a crucial assumption according to which mental content is reflexively transparent in the sense that a subject could not
judge that she has an intentional state and be mistaken about the content of her state, even if content is externally determined.(3)
My main purpose is to question this crucial assumption. Now the claim that mental content is reflexively transparent is extremely compelling and, if it
is correct while externalism is true, then this would indeed support the compatibility of externalism and self–knowledge. But, I want to argue that
mental content is not reflexively transparent on the assumption of externalism. If my argument is correct, the upshot is that self–knowledge and

Judgment in the House of Sand and Fog Essay
Judgment in the House of Sand and Fog People place judgment on one another every day based on differences. Sometimes it is done subconsciously;
sometimes it is done on purpose. In the book The House of Sand and Fog, by Andre Dubus III, two different cultures were represented; Kathy
represented the culture of the western civilization, whereas Behrani represented the culture of Persians. People judge one another based on unimportant
things, and get judged based on those same things as well. Two cultures were used to amplify how different their cultures were from one another.
Throughout the book cultures vocalized what they did not like about the other cultures by placing judgment on people based on ethnicity, appearance,
and status; ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
167). Lester judged Behrani's morals and his past based on the fact that Behrani was an ethnic man, a Persian man, photographed with a man who has
a bad history. He also threatened to have the INS check out the Behrani family, and "pull strings" if necessary to get the Behranis out of the house, even
though the Behrani family had full U.S. citizenship at that point. These judgments passed out by both cultures show that all cultures function using
judgment. In the reading The Case for Contamination, Appiah states that some people like and some people don't like that certain cultures have
accepted being "able to get a discussion going about Ronaldo, Mike Tyson or Tupac," and being able to "find a bottle of Guinness or Coca–Cola,"
(paragraph 9). Many people judge people who have accepted western civilizations, considering their identities threatened. Different cultures possess
different ideas of how people should present themselves. Appearance is a large part of culture, because a complete stranger can be judged based on
their appearance. Behrani is the kind of man who always has to look put together. He will not let people see him in un–kept clothing. When he worked
on the highway doing manual labor, he would wear a "work shirt", however when he left he would go to the bathroom at a hotel where he parked his
car and change immediately and wash up. He did not want anybody to see him looking dirty. The

Does Proof Can Be Better Than Others? Essay
reading activity:
Before you read, consider the following questions and jot down a few thoughts on each:
1.Often, when we talk about proof, we usually have a somewhat vague understanding of the term. When you use the word proof, what do you mean
by it? What kinds of proofs are there? Are there degrees of proof? Is a certain kind of proof better than another? What kind of proof do you feel most
strongly about?
When I use the word proof, I mean evidence to support something. I think you either have proof or you don't. For example, do you have proof to
support your claim? I think there aren't different kinds of proofs, and there could be varying degrees of proof. I also think that proof can be better
than others. Let say you are sick for a class and need proof of your sickness. You could either get proof that you were sick from a roommate, mom,
sister, brother etc. or you could get a doctors note. The doctors note would be a better kind of proof. I feel most strongly about proof that when
there is a high probability it cannot be anything else. For example, when you ask someone for their id and it looks like them, and they can produce
other forms of id, there's a high chance it is them. This is the same when you are providing evidence for your claim. I feel most strongly about proof
that comes from a reliable source.
2.On any given day, teachers make numerous judgments. When making a reasoned judgment, there are a number of things we need to do. For

Injustice and Judgment in Harper Lee's To Kill a...
Injustice and judgments are well known in the world. With so many people who get out of what they deserve or are punished for nothing at all.
People who are judged by how they appear or seem, and how cruel it can all be. The concept of injustice and judgments is written out in To Kill a
Mockingbird by Harper Lee. Injustice and judgments is the theme of To Kill a Mockingbird with certain symbols that help convey it, certain examples
are Mr. Raymond's "liquor" bottle, the snowman Scout and Jem made, and the gifts from Boo Radley. Mr. Raymond's "liquor" bottle helps conveys
the theme of the story because the bottle is actually Coca–Cola but the town believes it to be alcohol just because it is in a brown paper bag. The bottle
conveys ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"'–the assumption– the evil assumption– that all Negroes lie, that all Negroes are basically immoral beings, that all Negroes are not to be trusted
around our women, an assumption one associates with minds of their caliber,'" (204). This quote is Atticus talking to the jury at the trial. Atticus
is saying that most white people when they see a Negro they automatically do not trust them to tell the truth, have moral conscience, and to be
alone with females. All Negroes are thrown into the same group and are judged because of their skin. The last symbols are the gifts from Boo
Radley. The gifts are a show of affection from Boo to Scout and Jem. This falls into the theme because the whole town has rumors about how
horrible Boo is. Wild stories such as how Boo looks into people's windows at night and how he stabbed his father in the legs with scissors. They judge
Boo because he does not come out of his house at all, but Boo is really just another human being. He is capable of love and happiness just like
everyone else. To Kill a Mockingbird is an amazing book filled with life lessons. It gives the chance to realize how horrible people can be and how
injustice can fit into the world. Though most people will leave the book with a different conclusion. It is probably safe to say everyone will have a
positive conclusion and a new frame of mind. To Kill a Mockingbird is truly a

The Effect Of The Halo Effect
According to social psychologists, 30 seconds is how long it takes for someone meeting you for the first time to form a list of determinations about
your character and abilities. In 30 seconds, people form impressions of you based almost entirely on what they see – your clothes, hairstyle, smile, how
you carry yourself, and the rest of your nonverbal communications. Appearances do count. These quick impressions can also be lasting ones.
Psychologists call it the "halo effect." ("Appearances and First," 2011) The Halo Effect is the idea that global evaluations about a person (e.g. she
is likeable) bleed over into judgements about their specific traits (e.g. she is intelligent). It was deemed the "halo effect" because our perception of
others also creates a perception of a halo above their heads. People often only perceive what they want to perceive. An example of this affect is the
obsession that some people have with celebrities. Because most Hollywood stars are attractive, we often associate other likable traits with them such
as friendliness and intelligence. An experiment done by two professors at The University of Virginia, Richard Nisbett and Timothy Wilson, shows the
effects of the halo effect. Nisbett and Wilson 's experiment aimed to address and find an answer to the question regarding people 's awareness of the
halo effect. The researchers believe that people have little awareness of the nature of the halo effect, and that it influences their judgments and

Young Goodman Brown Character Analysis
Why are humans so judgmental of each other and of themselves, and with the harshest application? What causes such abysmal behavior? Is it because
of low self–esteem, envy, fear of rejection/feeling threatened or part of our culture or religion. Whatever the reasons "Young Goodman Brown" and
"A Good Man Is Hard to Find" illustrates the dangers of being judgmental. Brown see his self as a good person prior to entering the forest, and the
grandmother from A Good Man Is Hard to Find see herself as an upstanding southern woman until the end shows her different.
Let's explore "Young Goodman Brown" to see if there is a lesson to be learned about the dangers of being judgmental. Brown is a young man living in
the seventeen centuries and in Salem a town known as the capital of witchcraft. "Hawthorne references three dark events from the Puritans' history: the
Salem Witch Trials of 1692, the Puritan intolerance of the Quakers, and King Philip's War. During the Salem Witch Trials, one of the most nightmarish
episodes in Puritan history, the villagers of Salem killed twenty–five innocent people who were accused of being witches. The witch hunts often
involved accusation based on revenge, jealousy, botched child delivery and other reason that had little to do with perceived witchcraft." Based on the
history of the town it is easy to see why Young Goodman Brown is easily in tangled with corrupt thoughts about his friends and family because of
Puritan history. Coupled with Brown, going

The Little Red Chair Analysis
The Little Red Chair by Edna O'Brien demonstrates the judgment of small towns in Ireland. When a mysterious stranger arrives from an Irish town
of Cloonoila, the town begins to talk and question this man. Dr. Vladimir is an intriguing man and the town is dying to figure more about the new
visitor in town. The word around town is that Dr. Vladimir will practice as a Sex Therapist, as Father Damien states, " this is a Catholic country and
chastity is our number one commandment." Father Damien believes that Dr. Vladimir, "we have to be ever vigilant and SexTherapist sends the wrong
signals...experimentation thrills.. deviances.." Dr. Vladimir was not trying to send the wrong signals to the people of the town. As he stated, " I thank
you for having put it so succinctly, but let me say, I am not here to snatch away souls or bodies from your faith. I am here to do good." This statements
demonstrate the importance of religion to some small towns. Also, Father Damien did not want to seem judgmental, but he was to the career choice of
Dr. Vladimir. This small town in Ireland at this time is judgmental, O'Brien throughout the novel focuses on the different judgments the town has. In a
comparison to today's present time this novel is a great example of problems that the community faces in the 21st century.
It compares to today's society on the judgement of people's decisions regarding, religion. Today's community say that they are accepting, but if it does
not fit their religious

Memo for Motion Against Summary Judgment Essay
I.Introduction and Standard for Opposition to Summary Judgment
Crowell Academy, Inc. and Arturo Gomez, (hereinafter, collectively "Crowell") were grossly negligent and used willful misconduct in their
responsibilities involving the fencing club. The bargaining power of Crowell was so grossly unequal so as to put Lajuana Barnett at the mercy of
Crowell's negligence. Lastly, the exculpatory clause contained in the release form (see release form) is void as against public policy. Consequently,
under Maryland law, it is up to the trier of fact to determine if the exculpatory clause is unenforceable. As such, there is a dispute as to the genuine
issue of material fact related to Crowell's Answer, Crowell can be liable to Lajauna Barnett ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The defendant did not ask whether the plaintiff was left or right handed, and the plaintiff, not knowing otherwise, put on her equipment the same way
as she saw the other members of the club putting on their gear. A waiver of a right to sue is ineffective to shift the risk of a party's own willful,
reckless, or gross conduct. Id. at 543 (citing Winterstein v. Wilcom, 16 Md.App. 130, 134–36, cert. denied, 266 Md.744 (1972)).
In the present case, the defendant was "certified by the U.S. Fencing Association to provide instruction in fencing" and was to "instruct fencing club
members in the proper methods of fencing." These are direct quotes taken from the release form signed by the plaintiff. In signing the exculpatory
clause, plaintiff was to release defendant from "any and all claims" arising out of student's participation in fencing club activities. In return, plaintiff was
to receive instruction in the proper methods of fencing. This includes proper instruction in putting on the safety equipment, arguably the most important
aspect of the sport of fencing. The wording any and all claims can be construed as ambiguous. It would be against public policy to hold valid a claim
that released the defendant from any and all claims arising out of fencing club activities, including claims arising from the defendant's negligence. The
plaintiff signed the exculpatory clause releasing the defendant from

Literary Analysis Of Revelation By Flannery OConnor

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Cynthia Lamarche

More from Cynthia Lamarche (16)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Literary Analysis Of Revelation By Flannery OConnor