Arizona Immigration Law

Arizona Immigration Law
In 2010, President Barack Obama and his administration challenged the constitutionality of
Arizona's "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" (S.B. 1070). Not only does
the case further clarify federal power and jurisdiction over important policy functions, but it also
enlightens the citizenry on issues of racial tolerance as well as highlights the Supreme Court's role
as the arbiter of disputes over the power balance between states and the federal government. Arizona
governor, Jan Brewer, signed the Act in April of 2010 with intention to block further illegal
immigration. "The new law would require law enforcement officials to enforce existing federal
immigration laws in the state by checking the immigration status of a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The United States sought an injunction to prevent the law's implementation in its entirety by
challenging provisions 2b, 3, 5c, and 6 of the bill. The district court granted preliminary injunction
and the Ninth Circuit affirmed. After which, Arizona filed for appeal, and the Supreme Court
granted certiorari on December 12, 2011.
The Supreme Court's 5–3 decision held that three of the four provisions challenged were in violation
of the Supremacy Clause. Their decision reaffirmed that immigration policy is solely within the
purview of the federal government. Section 3 was preempted by the Supreme Court's clarification
that states cannot develop programs that require illegal immigrants to report themselves as non–
citizens. Furthermore, the Court upheld against Section 5C that the state cannot make it a crime for
undocumented immigrants to work or even apply for work. Finally, Section 6 was undermined by
the Court's decision to forbid state policies that lead to deportation of illegal immigrants who have
committed crimes, with the exception that the federal government explicitly asks for assistance in an
immigrant's immediate removal. Per contra, the Court unanimously voted in favor of Section 2(B),
which required that officers check the immigration status of all arrestees. The Court's holding was
that federal law did not preempt states' practice of checking immigration status on detainees. Due to
an unclear perception of the intention behind this provision,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Immigration Laws Should Be Repealed
Paolo S. Mutia
J. Richardson
AP Government 2nd Period
11 March 2015
Currently, one of most debated policy issues in America is immigration. Starting with the Chinese
Exclusion Act of 1882, the American government created several immigration laws that sought to
put an end to illegal immigration by mandating workplace regulations, employer sanctions, internal
enforcement mechanisms, and border security (Nowrasteh 2). According to immigration policy
analyst Alexander Nowrasteh at the Center of Global Liberty and Prosperity of the Cato Institute, by
the 1990s, legal immigration was essentially impossible to the United States unless the immigrant
was highly skilled, had a close American citizen or legal permanent resident relative or friend who
could sponsor him or her, or was a refugee. The Arizona immigration laws should be repealed due to
damage done to the state's economy, the benefits of immigrants to the American economic structure,
and the societal harm imposed upon citizens.
Illegal immigration is an unintend¬ed result of federal immigration restric¬tions from the shortage
of green cards (permanent residence) and temporary work visas available for migrants (Nowrasteh
2). Currently, 73% of the 11.5 million illegal immigrants nationally are located in ten states,
including Arizona (Nowrasteh 2). Between 2000 and 2008, Arizona experienced a large increase of
illegal immigrants from 330,000 to 560,000 (Nowrasteh 2). The costs of the housing bust and the
Great Recession

The Immigration Law Of 140 Years
Throughout the years we have gone through various achievements; the election of the first "Black"
President; the release of enslavement; the approval of "Gay" marriage and more, yet immigration
still remains untouched. Now that is clearly an exaggerated statement, but
The fact that the immigration law of 140 years ago is still not seen as a type of repression and the
American current civilization is still in denial of it, is what makes it ever so severe. From the first
immigration policy: the Page Act of 1875, to the Immigration reform and Control Act of 1986 the
immigration policies have remained the same. Both acts, among others are not written for the safety
of one country but for the racial discrimination of one specific group of immigrants, now especially
to Latin Americans. Because of this discrimination is why it is so essential to understand how the
immigrants have continued to exclude people and have not changed over time.
The Page Act determined whether the immigration of any subject of China, Japan, or any Oriental
country, to the United States, is free and voluntary. Further the importation into the United States of
women for the purposes of prostitution was forbidden and deemed a conviction of no more than five
years of prison time (Included in Chapter 141 Section 3 and 5 session 2). This act was incredibly
specific in its exclusion, it deliberately targeted a particular group and limited their entrance for
example by adding one characteristic (prostitution)

Stricter Immigration Laws
Kate Stein was a thirty–two–year–old woman who lived in San Francisco. She was murdered in
front of her father's eyes by Juan Lopez–Sanchez, and illegal immigrant from Mexico. In today's day
and age, immigration laws do little to protect Americans, and the few put in place are blatantly
ignored by certain cities. The United States is in need of immigration reform due to the dangers of
terrorism, as well as the drastically high criminal rates in sanctuary cities.
Stricter immigration laws need to be issued to protect citizens from terrorism. In 1998, Al–Qaeda
issued a religious decree, declaring all Muslims must wage a "holy war" against America. Since
then, thousands of innocents have been killed by radical Muslims misusing their religion.

Illegal Immigration Law
Just like the natives, immigrants also commit criminal activities, and they are supposed to face
corrective measures designed by the respective countries they reside. One of the research that was
carried by and published in local dailies revealed that contrary to popular belief, immigrants are less
likely to commit crime than the natives. Also, experts assert that the available evidence does not
support the claim that undocumented immigrant's disproportionate share of the crimes. When the
U.S. president assumes s power, he gave executive orders stating that many people who are entering
the country with no permission did present a significant threat to public safety and national security
at large (Martin 136). Therefore, a directive to the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Just like it is our expectation when we go the hospital when we are sick, we expect to come out with
a feeling of relief and better than when we went into the facility. It is also in the same breath that the
criminal justice system needs not to be dissimilar in applying the help to them than exposing them to
deportation.
Currently, there is a grand senate plan that will form the core of any successful reform effort. The
program considers a second chance too many non–citizens who are convicted of criminal activities.
Moreover, immigration departments together with the judges would be powerless to make
exceptions for the aliens if they were to be put into deportation proceedings. These people have
lived their lives in the United States since their childhood and consequently, have established strong
family ties to the U.S. people. Many of them are lawful permanent residents, but the crime may have
been a relative minor. No matter, even the people that have served out their punishment and have
been ardent law–abiding citizens would have less or no hope of getting right with the law
(Morawetz 29). It is, therefore, needless to say, deportation of the immigrant with criminal records is
an easy political tool to campaign on, but it calls for sobriety. Eviction becomes the best alternative
in situations where all social justice

Plenary Power In Immigration Law
In United States, under the constitutional law, plenary power is a power that is granted to Congress
absolutely, with no review of, or limitations upon, the exercise of power. The assignment of a
plenary power to Congress divests all other authorities from the right to exercise that power, and
where unless otherwise entitled; also, the right to substantively review the exercise the power in a
particular instance or in general. In relation with immigration law, Congress, under the Plenary
Power Doctrine, has the power to make immigration policy. The Executive Branch is entrusted with
enforcing the immigration laws passed by Congress and Judiciary reviews immigration

Persuasive Essay On Immigration Law
Every year, hundreds of thousands of immigrants travel legal and illegal, from around the world,
come into the United States. The destination that attract some individuals or group to leave their
home are for better economic opportunities, higher standards of living, and freedom. Immigration
has been the defining characteristic of America long before the country even began. It's important to
remind ourselves of our rich history of where it all started. We all came from different places of the
world to create this multicultural groups of people that is in the United States in the 21st century.
While Immigration policies have been perfected over the decades, the Trumps administration
attempts to abolish those laws that have been in place by prioritizing on the value of immigrants,
prohibit the travel of Muslim countries from entering the United States and end a government
program which thousands of young immigrants can face deportation.
A proposed change in immigration law announced by president the Trump administration would
have a critical impact in the way possible immigrants are selected and become citizens. No longer
would America be a place for people that had the desire to come for equal opportunity. Instead,
America would largely focus on the skilled, higher earning and English speaking immigrates. Trump
states that this change will benefit "struggling America families" by putting "their needs first and
Americas needs first." This bill propose will include a limit on

Should Immigration Laws Be Reformed?
Mark Zepeda
Mr. Witt
American Literature
26 November 2009
Should Immigration Laws Be Reformed?
Immigration is a great part of this country. Immigrants came here for freedom and liberty from their
oppressed and miserable country. They come here to find a "NEW" life to live and support their
family. America was basically built from immigrants. How else would we have started this beautiful
country? If it wasn 't for Christopher Columbus (who was an immigrant) this wouldn 't be the great
country it is today.
Immigration is becoming a big deal in this country. Everyone is complaining about it. Honestly they
need to mind their own business. They are not the ones who are trying to make their families have a
better life. Americans have it made for them. They can go find a job whenever they want, get a
rental car, airplane ticket, start a career, just everything. Immigrants have to live here for some
amount of years, and have a criminal check. Its just harder for immigrants to get respect in this
country. Americans always complain about immigrants coming here to steal jobs from all the
americans. They 're trying to start a new life and get a family started. Mind your own business and
let them be. There trying to be like "us" americans, to have a successful job and a family.
Immigrants are a great benefit to our economy. We're always saying immigrants are ruining our
economy and are harming it. They should do their research and actually see how much immigrants
help our

Immigration Law Summary
Summary article: At the hearing of President Tuman's appointed commission on Immigration and
Naturalization witnesses plead with the retainment of security and the liberalization of racial
restrictions on McCarran Immigration Act. In Los Angeles, California witnesses like Edward H.
Gibbons who was a representative the Los Angeles Conference of Civic Organizations gave
examples of individuals under the immigration act and the examples they are pleading to the
commission. Edward H. Gibbons mention Harry Bridges who was a union leader convicted on
perjury in obtaining a citizenship and was now under deportation. However Mr. Gibbons explain
that Harry Bridges hasn't been deported in the last twenty years as his country refuse to accept him.
This

Immigration Law Joseph Justin Summary
Focusing much of his work around immigration law, Joseph Justin "J.J." Rollins has dedicated much
of practice to helping undocumented citizens and their families before the United States Citizenship
and Immigration Services and Immigration Courts. Justin is the co–director of the Immigration
Rights Project, specifically targeting immigrants. Much of his work revolves around crimmigration
issues, which is the merge between criminal law and immigration policy. His work also includes
working with criminal defense counsels to minimize consequences for immigrants with pending
criminal charges. Currently, Justin works at the Oregon Justice Resource Center in Portland, Oregon
and their mission is to improve legal representation and to promote civil

Anti Immigration Law Essay
The influence of the anti–immigration law to the American's future. Every year people from all over
the world, leaving their homes and moving to the United States. These people are willing to sacrifice
themselves in the hope to start a new life, to find an opportunity for financial support for their
families, to give a chance for their children have a better future in the safe country. Some of them
immigrate in order to find freedom or relief from political and religious persecution. Each of these
brave persons has a big reason to leave a Homeland, family, friends, work and all elements of a
human's life without even a possibility to come back home one day. According to recent changes in
the immigration law of the U.S., not everyone, who is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Despite the fact that immigrants are raising the country's economy, the government does not provide
them an adequate financial support, legal and medical protection. Having arrived in the country, a
potential immigrant must submit the documents to the immigration office for reviewing his or her
case. Depending on the category of a visa, the person will receive a work permission approximately
in 6 months. Before this time, the alien is not allowed to apply for a driver's license, insurance,
work, school, and cannot leave the country. Compere to Sweden, where the government pays
pension while the alien's documentations are in the process, the U.S. does not support foreign people
until the work permission is approved. It is very difficult to live without even a possibility of income
during a long time. In general, a whole documentation process can take from one to five years, or
even more. For people, who do not speak English, their new life in America seems like a prison.
After receiving a green–card, a person has right to apply for the U.S. Passport, not earlier than in
another five years. Brave people, who went through a long documentation process, today
establishing their own companies for the benefits of their families, and their

Anti-Immigration Law
The influence of the anti–immigration law to the Americans future. Every year people from different
parts of the world leaving their homes and immigrate to the United States. These people are willing
to sell themselves in order to find a better life or to have money to send back home, or to make sure
their children are raised in a better county. Some of them came seeking personal freedom or relief
from political and religious persecution. Each one of these brave persons has a big reason to leave a
Homeland, family, friends, work and all elements of a human's life without even a possibility to
come back one day. According to recent changes in the immigration law of the U.S., not everyone,
who is ready to leave a Homeland is allowed to join ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Today's foreign immigrants account for approximately one–third of America's annual population
growth, not only because of their large and increasing numbers, but also because of America's low
birth rate (16 per 1000) and low fertility rate (1.8)" (Carlson). The current population of the U.S. is
212 million people, if one–third of them will leave, then a country's economy will crash. The impact
of the anti–immigrant laws have is completely negative, because if immigrants will go back home or
will move to another country, the state loses workers and consumers who earn and spend money and
pay taxes in the state. These taxes are the part of the country's budget, which is distributed of the
benefits for all residents of the country. The absence of immigrants will impact and loss in many
different occupations and industries, from construction and landscape to finance and IT. Though
some U.S.–born workers could fill some of those jobs, large gaps in several sectors would remain
and cause a decline in the economy. The generations of immigrants have helped lay the railroads and
build American cities, pioneer new industries and fuel our Information Age, from Google to the
iPhone and society cannot just lose these people or not let potential ones of them enter into the
country. The consequences of an anti–immigration law will cause to the recession of the

Arizona’s Immigration Law Essay
It is clear that illegal immigration has gotten out of control and constringent measures need to be
taken to protect the United States borders. The local Government of Arizona recently decided to take
control of the situation, by passing the "Support our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods
Act" {House Bill 2162}. This bill gives law enforcement officers and agencies the authority, to
lawfully stop, detain and arrest anyone who appears to look like an illegal alien. The bill out–right
condones racial profiling and it violates civil rights, as well!
Home Land security statistics on immigration verifies that there are approximately 11 million illegal
immigrants who reside in the United States. In Arizona, there is an estimate of 460,000 ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition, State Senator Russell Pearce (R) seems to be quite friendly with J.T Ready who is
known member of the Neo–Nazi National Socialist Movement. His association to the White
Supremacist, J. T Ready has caused citizens to question his motivation behind the new immigration
law (Beirich Heidi).
Kris Kobach the main legal mind behind Arizona's new immigration law, in the past has been
associated with racial profiling. Kobach was U.S Attorney John Ashcroft's leading Advisor on
immigration. He invented the "National Security Entry–Exit Registration System" {NSEERS}. The
program was developed to closely observe Arab and Muslim Men; and sometimes U.S citizens. On
December 1 2003, NSEERS was suspended. The termination was due to allegations of racial
profiling and discrimination which violates civil rights. In April 2010, Kris Kobach and Arizona
Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, was accused of racial profiling. These allegations led to a
federal grand jury investigation. Kris Kobach is currently an attorney for legal arm for the
Federation of American Immigration Reform {FAIR}. FAIR is listed as an anti–immigrant hate
group since 2007 by SPLC. It is considered a hate group; it received donations of $1.2 million from
Pioneer Fund a foundation that was established by Nazi affiliates (Bauer Mary). The Legal Director
of Southern Poverty Law Center {SPLC} has implied that Kris Kobach is an anti–immigration
lawyer and racist in several articles.
Janet

Strict Immigration Law
Legal immigration law are making it hard for people to get in this country to have a good future
with their families or to have good job opportunities. Some reasons why legal immigration laws
should be less stricter is because some people from their original nation might have been threatened
with killing family members or other things. Another reason it should be less stricter is because if
the laws are to strict, people are going to try break them so they can get what they want, but if they
are not as strict not many people would break the law.
Some people want strict legal immigration law because some people think that immigrants are
taking away people's' jobs. Other people think that immigrants come here to "harm" people. Some
think that

Reasons To Follow Immigration Laws
Recently President Trump, the 45th President of the United States, has acted to follow the current
Immigrations Laws, set out by the United States Congress, by ending former President Obams
Executive Action order which was designed to supersede the law and provide amnesty for illegal
immigrants. I support this position for several reasons, one being that we must have laws in the
country to follow, we must follow the order of the U.S. Constitution and we must not allow people
to unfairly cut in line because they have children. Our founding fathers set up many of our policies
from following the teachings of very smart philosophers of the past. One such philosopher, John
Locke stated, "The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve

Immigration Laws Essay
Perhaps the most complex set and the most aspiring for anyone to look for is the US Immigration
Laws. It is also the most followed for any country for Immigration. The set of laws which undergoes
a paradigm shift. This law has its traces as early as 1790, because the first ever framed set of laws
was also framed in the year 1790. From then on the Immigration laws has been to put to heavy make
over, which till date undergoes many amendments. Five years from its promulgation the law was
amended having 5 years as a period for a permanent residency, which still holds good even today.
The INA (Immigration and naturalization Act) is the covering body for the current Immigration Act.
The law allows for 675,000 immigrants every year to be processed. The immigrants may be fall
under any of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Family reunification, provision of scarce labor and protecting American workers from competition
with foreign workers are some of the ways where the American Government manages and controls
the number of migrants. High skilled but rare labor is always in demand. Migrating through such
areas of Immigration laws is the legal and right way to path break the complex structured
Immigration Laws of the U.S. Though the highly structure and the myriad amendments might have
made the law complex it is still one of the most liberal and free set of laws for the Birth right of
Citizenship is acquired right from one birth, unlike many European or other developed countries
where one has to spend several years of permanent residency to acquire citizenship. Obtaining a
permanent residency will be the ultimatum for any immigrant, which is acquired by employment,
family based, and the most unsolicited path "The Refugee", because a lot of restrictions and benefits
are curbed when you are an illegal immigrant. The U.S. Government has in the recent years has
made permanent residency viable for foreign

Law Enforcement and Immigration Essay
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Two major periods of immigration
influxes since the turn of the century as well as the transformation of the nation due to both illegal
and legal immigration have determined large
Hispanic communities in many Western states. States like Texas, for example, have struggled to
define increasingly complex Hispanic communities and create a response, both in the government
and in law enforcement, for addressing the needs of these large Hispanic communities.
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
In recent years, an obvious dichotomous view has come to the forefront of national debates about
the composition of Hispanic communities in border ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; It is necessary to recognize that many of the individuals
comprising the Hispanic communities in cities of West Texas were not primarily the product of
illegal immigration. The immigration history of the United States suggests two primary influxes of
Hispanic populations during periods of legal immigration. In 1965, for example, the
Immigration and Nationality Act removed federal limits on new immigration and allowed a greater
number of relatives of current citizens to enter the United States (Andrews and Knack, 1997). In
1986, the government opened the system for people who had illegally settled in the United
States, increasing the number of once–illegal immigrants who became
American citizens (and then were able to sponsor the immigration of additional family members)
(Andrews and Knack, 1997). The base of illegal immigrants who came to the United States because
of the availability of migrant farm work since the turn of the century, the amnesty program th! at
allowed them to attain citizenship, and the secondary introduction of family members defined a
large segment of the Hispanic community.
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; In addition to a largely stable Hispanic American community
in regions of the state of Texas, there is also a definable segment of the Hispanic community
comprised

Immigration Laws Affect America
"The Immigration Ban and How it Will Affect America"
On January 20th, 2017, Donald J. Trump was inaugurated and became the official 45th President of
the United States. A mere seven days later, and the country is already tearing at the seams. January
27th, 2017 marks the day that the world stopped spinning for a multitude Muslim immigrants. It
marks the day that the immigration ban was signed, prohibiting citizens from seven countries of a
large Islamic populace (Yemen, Sudan, Iraq, Syria, Iran, Somalia, and Libya) from entering America
for a period of 90 days.On top of that, the U.S. refugee program was suspended for an extra 30 days
in hopes of preventing terrorists from entering the country. This ban will be detrimental to not only
America's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rallies, riots, and protests have been springing up even outside of the U.S. Former president Barack
Obama has already spoken out against the immigration ban recently put into place. "In his final
official speech as President, he spoke about the important role of citizen[s] and how all Americans
have a responsibility to be guardians of our democracy― not just during an election but every day,"
said Obama's spokesman Kevin Lewis, quoted in a 2017 NPR article. Not only that, but according to
a 2017 New York Times article, the immigration ban is illegal. Over 50 years ago, Congress
outlawed discrimination against immigrants based on national origin. In 1924, after the troubles
relating to the Asiatic Barred Zone, Congress created a comprehensive "national–origins system."
Trump, in defense, quoted a 1952 law allowing the president the ability to "suspend the entry" of
"any class of aliens," which was restricted in 1965, something our president should know if he's
going to run the country for four years. Donald Trump, by doing this, is violating the beliefs of the
Philosophes, i.e. Voltaire, Rousseau, and Locke. He does so by ignoring religious tolerance, and by
violating the Constitution and natural rights. Donald Trump is not only lacking knowledge on the
Constitution and American laws, but he is also putting out country at risk by placing this ban in
order. On the contrary, Trump is doing so with best

Immigration Reform Is The Renewal Of Our Immigration Laws
Our laws on Immigration need an upgrade and most politicians would agree that we need
immigration reform also. Immigration reform is the renewal of our immigration laws, but little
progress has been made to make this a reality. Obama has made several actions to hopefully allow
immigrants to have a chance to become citizens, but no new laws have been put into action.
Presidential candidates speak a lot about immigration reform. Democrats tend to want laws to
become more relaxed while Republicans tend to be opposing that view. Democrats want to allow
immigrants a better chance at becoming citizens. Republicans want to close our borders; some are
more extreme than others.
Many people think that allowing more people in our ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Without immigration America wouldn't be America.
Immigration is an important part of the world, it affects our lives today. Our country was founded on
immigration and it's an important subject. Our past can guide us through changes in America 's
immigration reform.
The history of immigration runs strong in the U.S because almost all of us are descendants of
immigrants. The first major waves of immigrants came around the colonial era, seeking a new life.
These colonial era immigrants came to America for economic reasons, mostly, or greater
opportunities. Though most of these colonial immigrants lived in poverty, working as servants,
similar to modern immigrants.
First major immigration act was the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. The act banned all Chinese
laborers to come to America. The act was mostly for those on the west coast, due to the thought that
the Chinese were decreasing wages. The act suspended Chinese immigration for ten years and then
for another ten years after that. Racism played a part in the motives to remove the Chinese
immigrant also.
The immigration and nationality act was meant to allow refugees into America. "The act was placed
due to the lack of immigration around the time of the great depression and World War II, according
acording to history.com". This act allowed Americans to sponsor relatives in a different country.
Since this act was placed the nationality of immigrants have changed to Latin born immigrants,
which is the

Immigration Laws And Policies Are Unfair
Immigration has been an existing occurrence ever since the first of humans and persisted as land
continued being discovered. There has always been major controversy over this subject, both public
and political, especially in the country of America. Immigration laws and policies are unfair because
many of these people are not what citizens depict them as. When people think of immigrants their
thoughts automatically connect to Mexicans, field workers, and crossing the U.S./Mexico border.
What many Americans forget is that the United States was founded off of immigration, everything
from America's discovery by Europeans, to African slavery, and has followed up to current day
cultural diversity. Illegal immigration should not be a real concept because most of the accusations
that are connected to immigrants are not true and are based solely on stereotypes and there are
further issues associated with this process of deportation than the ones that initially appear.
Regardless of the common claims that are directed at immigrants, there are many statistics that
support the more positive aspect of these "aliens." One of the many things that cause many people to
oppose immigration are that many immigrants have low living standards or are simply living off of
government welfare programs. The Center for American Progress actually stated that "Less than one
in five immigrants live in poverty, and they are no more likely to use social services than the native–
born Americans" (CAP,

Essay on Immigration Law Reform
Immigration reform has been making the news for many years – since Arizona passed SB1070 and
Alabama passed HB56. In an attempt to curtail enactment of these laws, the United States
Department of Justice, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department
of State, and United States Department of Education filed complaints against both states.
Additionally, there are over "865 bills and resolutions relating to immigrants and refugees in 45 state
legislatures and the District of Columbia during the first quarter of 2012" (2012 Immigration–
Related Laws, 2012) with the exception five states who were not in session at the time of reporting.
Immigration laws in the United States started with the passage of the 1790 ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 delegated federal
authority to state and local enforcement "to arrest, detain, investigate non–citizens for immigration,
and collective evidence. In addition, transferred enforcement to the Department of Homeland
Security after the 9/11 terrorist attacks" (as cited in Huntington, 2008, p. 799–800) on behalf of the
federal government. Finally, the purpose of immigration laws is to determine status, rights, and
obligations associated with alien residency, naturalization and/or citizenship (Immigration, n.d.).
Furthermore, "immigration law serves as a gatekeeper for the nation's border, determining who may
enter, how long they may stay, and when they must leave. Congress has complete authority over
immigration. States have limited legislative authority regarding immigration" (as cited in
Immigration, n.d).
Arizona v. United States, ___ U. S. ___ (2012) is a pending court case regarding Arizona's
immigration statute. In 2010, Arizona enacted to immigration reform laws after the federal
government's failure to enforce current immigration reform laws. Arizona state laws SB1070 and
HB2162, "enjoined since July 2010 following a federal challenge, and currently under appeal to the
United States

Immigration Laws : Are They Fair
Immigration Laws: are they Fair to New Immigrants?
From Sea to Sea to Sea. This is the Canadian belief. All are welcome: from sea, to sea, to sea.
Canada, to this day, is one of the most open countries towards immigration in the world (Troper).
With a whopping 20.6% of its population identified as immigrants (Immigration...), Canada is
known for its generosity towards Immigrants and refugees all around the world. Though Canada
asks immigrants of certain qualifications (Tariq), it is nevertheless drastically easier to enter,
compared to most of other western developed countries (Debra). The process of Immigration to
Canada is attainable, and fair to immigrants of all status.
A common misconception of law, in general, is considering ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
You might ask: "Where do all these immigrants come from, and who are they?" The answer is,
everyone. All, or almost all, are welcome to Canada. Whether you are an economic class, family
class, a refugee, or a temporary worker, you have the ability to apply for immigration and
citizenship. Unless you have a disease that could endanger public health, have no means of financial
support, or are known to be a criminal or a terrorist, you have the ability to apply for immigration to
Canada. Is prohibiting a terrorist from entering your country unfair? Not in my opinion. A great
number of people complain about Canada making it harder to immigrate by passing a new Act, but
this is not true. Immigration and Refugee Protection Act was passed in 2002, replacing the 1976
Immigration Act (Troper), and the new Act did have more restrictions on the less wealthy,
undereducated, and unskilled immigrants, but that does not make it unreasonable. Before this Act,
countless number of the skilled and educated could not immigrate because their place was taken by
immigrants that in many cases were not even educated. This was very frustrating. Imagine entering a
contest with a few friends and working very hard to win the prize, then watching as the
administrator hands the prize to a little kid who just happened to walk down the street that your
contest was taking place at. These people

The Immigration And The Rule Of Law Essay
The Republicans Immigration and the Rule of Law is a controversial topic because of the
stereotypical propaganda that all legal and illegal immigrants take jobs and blow up buildings. These
ideas are byproducts of racial profiling in America. Racial profiling is a common occurrence in the
United States. In an article called Racial profiling – separate and unequal keeping the minorities in
line – the role of law enforcement in America, it specifically talks about racial profiling in the police
force. The article expresses that racial profiling is one of the most serious, enduring, and divisive
human rights violations in the United States. April Walker has gone more into detail about racial
profiling. Also stating that social and economic progress of African–Americans over the past fifty
years, Americans continue to live in a country where racial inequity is the norm and it affects the
progression of Black–Americans in the United States (Walker, 2011). The dominant belief about
Blacks, upon which their legal rights, or lack of, were historically constructed, was the belief in their
ontological inferiority. (Walker, 2011) . In traditional Americanism, Black–American people are
perceived as poor, lazy, lustful, ignorant, and prone to criminal behavior. (Walker, 2011). April
Walker also expresses multiple incidences that minorities were the victims of brutal attacks. Walker
further goes into if race or religion or ethnicity increase the chance of becoming a victim,

Special Immigration Law
Special Visa Provision for Third World African Countries Immigrants
Immigration is a big issue globally, and it's even a bigger issue in the United States. Countries are
constantly evaluating the influx of immigrants to their countries. Are there benefits to allowing these
immigrants to keep coming to the countries? Are there downsides to such benefits and how is the
population of these countries that allow immigrants affected? In the United, which has been termed
"The land of opportunity" by the entire world, how do the immigration laws work? Do immigrants
from other countries contribute to the success, safety, and prosperity of the nation? What role would
immigrants from third world countries play in America and what does it mean for those ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Yes, this special immigration law will make it very easy for individuals from these countries to get
visas to come to the United States. They should be given a 20 years permanent residency at the port
of entry to legally stay and live in US, study, and develop themselves in various aspects of life. It's
better to show them how to fish for themselves than just giving them fish to eat all the time.
Through the opportunities that the United States offers; they can become democratic politicians,
doctors and nurses, lawyers, professors and teachers, philanthropists, journalists, community
leaders, psychologists, artists, motivational speakers, life coaches, counsellors, human rights
activists, accountants and CPAs, pilots, entrepreneurs and business managers. People form these
third world African counties need to have their minds renewed and educated in the American
systems and standards because that's the only way they can truly experience freedom. They can take
these skills and leadership back to their respective countries to become the true catalyst of change
that they desperately need. Giving enough time and making it easy for these immigrants to immerse
themselves in the American culture is the real change that their countries and communities need.
Immigrants from these African third world countries are hardworking and wonderful cultured
people. For example, people from Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Liberia, and more have deep love for
family and are law abiding too. They don't complain and are grateful individuals. Short term visas
ranging from one month to three months given to these individuals through a very tough and
excruciating process are not enough to allow them to totally assimilate in the American culture that
would produce a serious change in their lives . If they get short term visas, they'll eventually become
unlawful

Immigration Law Case Study
aw enforcement to demand proof of immigration status from anyone whom they have reasonable
suspicion to believe is unauthorized. This law also criminalizes actions such as (a) living in Arizona
without lawful immigration status, (b) failing to carry immigration documentation, and (c)
transporting or housing and unauthorized individual (Detention Watch Network, 2010). Under the
law S. B. 1070, undocumented immigrants may be given a misdemeanor charge for trespassing, a
penalty that includes a mandatory prison sentence of 20 days, obligation to pay jail fees, and
deportation (Miller, 2010).
According to Miller (2010), "the stage was set for S. B. 1070 in 2005,when the Department of
Homeland Security launched Operation Streamline, a federal immigration– ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
This occurred a few days after a Federal District Court Judge made a decision that allowed most of
this new law's provisions to go into effect. Under the new 11th Circuit ruling, some of the provisions
of H. B. 56 that are still in effect include Section 12: requires local law enforcement to request
verification of immigration status if reasonable suspicion that person is undocumented, Section 18:
requires law enforcement to request verification of immigration status from persons arrested for
driving without a license, Section 27: invalidates contracts entered into when one individual knows
the other is undocumented, and Section 30: makes it a felony for undocumented immigrants to
conduct a business transaction with the state including applying for a driver's license ("Despite
Department of Justice's Relentless Attack," 2011). Other provisions of the H.B. 56 have been
temporarily blocked. These include Section 10: states that undocumented individuals who do not
comply with federal registration laws may be charged with a misdemeanor, and Section 28: requires
public schools to gather information regarding students' immigration status and submit this data to
the state ("Despite Department of Justice's Relentless Attack,"

Argumentative Essay On Immigration Law
Immigration is such a complicated topic. I really didn't realize everything that went into it until I got
to college and was able to vote myself. Although I have written thousands of words on this topic, I
still am unsure if I can for certain say that I completely agree with one side of the argument or the
other. What I do believe is the fact that immigration is a touchy issue, especially within the United
States, and each case should be looked at differently. My first source I talked about was an article I
found on the internet called, "Top Ten Reasons for Enforcing America's Immigration Laws". This
article was written by Frosty Wooldridge and promoted the idea of a more enacted immigration law
in the United States. Wooldridge promoted 10 different reasons why he so strongly believed that
these immigration laws should be strictly followed. Wooldridge believed that "it's time to raise the
American standard of living." The real minimum wage in the United States has been dropping for
more than an entire decade. Some people believe that we need to raise the minimum wage, but then
this would lead to raising to price of illegal laborers above our free–market value. This would then
result in a huge amount of mass unemployment. This I agree with. American citizens are the ones
suffering when it comes to illegal workers getting paid under the table. Wooldridge also stated that
we as America, would be creating over ten million new jobs for United States citizens. I agree with
this

Immigration Law: A Case Study
U.S. law requires everyone admitted into the country under an H4 visa to pay federal income taxes;
however, many are confused about the process because they are ineligible to apply for a Social
Security number, which is required by the IRS to process an individual's tax return. The attorneys at
Berd & Klauss, PLLC, a NYC immigration law firm, explain that visa holders must apply for a
different unique number under which they can submit their taxes: the Individual Taxpayer
Identification Number, or ITIN.
Like a Social Security Number, an ITIN is a nine–digit number the Internal Revenue Service issues
to identify individual taxpayers, but for resident and non–resident aliens who owe taxes to the
federal government.
To apply for an ITI, H4 visa

Immigration Laws In The Late 1800s
Immigration law have the 'aliens' pursuing fault dreams of becoming a U.S citizen. The United
States began to get big waves of immigrants in the late 1800's and in the late 1900's. Immigrants
came to the "land of opportunities" to begin a new and better life. The immigration laws began with
the Page act of 1875, that was when the United States restricted immigrants from Asia. Next was the
Chinese Exclusion act of 1882, the act stated the prohibition of all immigrants of Chinese laborers.
With this act, more and more immigration laws came into play. In the early 1900's the "congress
created the U.S border patrol within the Immigration Service."(cis.org) In 1952 the United states
passed the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, the act prohibited immigrants to come to the
United states because the population was getting out of control. In 1996, congress passed the illegal
immigration reform and immigrants responsibility act. The act ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The United States passed the Life act. The Life act was a mini–amnesty aimed at those illegal aliens
who hoped to become green card holders through marriage, employment or other categories, but
who were not anywhere near approval yet, due to the long line of people ahead of them. After the
terrorist attack on September 11th the United states began to question the idea of giving immigrants
visas. 4 of the terrorist did have visas and had violated the terms of their visas and became illegal
aliens.The attack exposed long–standing holes in our immigration system that included failures at
visa processing, internal enforcement, and information sharing. One of the main arguments was
should we punish all immigrants looking for a better life when only 4 committed a crime. I think the
only thing the U.S should've done different was do a bigger background check and every once in
while they should try to check up on

Immigration Laws : Arizona Anti Immigration Law
SB 1070: Arizona Anti–Immigration Law
Introduction and Summary
SB 1070 Anti–Immigration Law was passed by Arizona legislators and signed by former Arizona
Governor Jan Brewer in early 2009 when another former Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano
became Secretary of Homeland Security under President Barack Obama's administration (Morse,
2011). After Jan Brewer took office, she was looking for ways to strengthen the anti–immigration
laws. Former Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce was attempting to find ways to pass an anti–
immigration bill through the Arizona legislature called SB1070 (Morse, 2011). The new law
required people to provide identification at traffic stops and crime scenes, but targeted illegal
immigrants or those suspected to be illegal immigrants (Pavlich, 2012). This law is already passed
and has received backlash from the Hispanic community.
Effects on Family, Friends, Community, Economy, Services
The illegal immigrations affect lots of family members who lived in the United States and were
deported back to Mexico. The family members are unable to speak by telephone, the internet or
through detention centers (American Immigration Council, n,d). The school district took a
responsibility to make sure the children didn't drop out of grade school. When the family members
got deported to Mexico they were unable to speak with their children, causing economic hardship
and psychological stress in the children (American Immigration Council, n.d).
How the Bill Affects

The Enactment Of Arizona Immigration Laws
A.Thesis statement: The enactment of Arizona immigration laws is the result of long–standing
structural racism effects, and the practice of these laws leads to unconstitutional racial profiling
concerns that target the Latino community on the basis of ethnicity.
B. Description of paper / argument:
a. In this paper, I will first discuss the historical development of structural racism in Arizona.
b. Second, I will examine and analyze Arizona's current immigration policies.
c. Finally, I will discuss unconstitutional practices that have originated from the criminalization of
the immigration legislations toward the Latino community.
d. I will argue that the current immigration system in Arizona results in a continual perpetuation of
structural racism affecting the daily lives of its Latino communities.
e. Recommendations to be constructed...
BACKGROUND
The Historical Emergence of Structural Racism in Arizona
Several historical legislations have contributed to the intensification of structural racism in Arizona
towards Latino immigrants that has been carried along to modern days. Most of them originated
from past disputes over illegal immigration, which for the most part entail perceptions of illegal
immigrants as "criminal aliens".
The creation of the term "criminal alien" arose from lawmakers that urged to combine immigration
control with criminal law enforcement (Coleman) and to focus on reducing illegal migration with
militarized border security and strict

Australian Immigration Law Essay
Have you been looking for a way to find the right Immigration Law Firm Melbourne? Recently, I
wrote an article on hiring the right immigration lawyer in Melbourne, and this article is an extension
to my previous article. Australian Immigration process comes with complicated rules and
regulations that you may don't understand. Which means you need to hire a top–class Immigration
Law Firm Melbourne who can do it right for you. Good–for–nothing law firms are everywhere
today, so you should find the right one after a thorough research. Don't worry. In this article, I am
giving you tips on finding the right law firm in Melbourne. Let's begin.
* As mentioned, terrible law firms are there across Melbourne who will just waste your time and
money. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Meet them in person, and have a serious conversation about their previous happy customers and so
on. A sit–down meeting is the best time to know who they are and what they do. Trust your intuition,
and don't hesitate to ask for references. A reputable Immigration Law Frim Melbourne should have
hundreds of previous happy clients to show you.
* Yes, you can negotiate on fees. Anyway, don't expect a reputable law firm to be that cheap. It is
dead simple. A reputable firm will charge you more for their exceptional service. Hiring the cheapest
law firm in Melbourne is not advisable so. It is a well–known fact that if you get your application
rejected, then the second time is going to be tougher. Anyway, a reputable Immigration Law Firm
Melbourne can help you with your appeal case too.
* Make sure they allocate an immigration attorney to your case. Every visa application is a different
application, so the immigration attorney should take it seriously. Don't make blind decisions so. Do,
your research on the visa process before you hit the law firm you are considering. If not, you will
not know whether they the right thing or not. When you have come to the right Immigration Law
Firm Melbourne, you will know it. Now, that is called your intuition. Be ready to spend some cash. I
mean, as mentioned; a reputable law firm will charge you more than what the good–for–nothing
companies do. But you will

Should Immigration Laws Be Reformed
Immigration is a serious problem but without it the united states would be nothing. Most consider
immigration a big problem, and i agree it's a problem in the united states but not all immigrants are
bad. Without immigrants you wouldn't be here i wouldn't here only the native americans will be
here. Immigration laws in the United States should be reformed because, kids go to foster homes
because parents get deported, they live in fear due not knowing if it's their last day here or not, and
they make up a lot of the population. Let's look at why immigration laws should be reformed. The
United States is against immigrants coming here illegally but what they don't realize is the damage
they do to families. 'At least 5,100 children in 22 states

Canadian Immigration Law
The appellant, a woman with Canadian–born dependent children, was ordered deported. She then
applied for an exemption, based on humanitarian and compassionate considerations under s. 114(2)
of the Immigration Act, from the requirement that an application for permanent residence be made
from outside Canada. This application was supported by letters indicating concern about the
availability of medical treatment in her country of origin and the effect of her possible departure on
her Canadian–born children.
In this application, senior immigration officer replied by letter stating that there were insufficient
humanitarian and compassionate reasons to warrant processing the application in Canada. This letter
contained no reasons for the decision. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The order that the appellant be removed from Canada, which was made after the immigration
officer's decision, was stayed pending the result of the appeal.
The appeal was held and as per the Judge, L'Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, McLachlin, Bastarache and
Binnie JJ.: " Section 83(1) of the Immigration Act does not require the Court of Appeal to address
only the certified question. Once a question has been certified, the Court of Appeal may consider all
aspects of the appeal lying within its jurisdiction. Certain questions were raised during the trial.
Though the immigration officer gave reasons for his or her decision. It should be noted that other
factors should have been taken into consideration in regards to procedural fairness applies to
humanitarian and compassionate decisions.
Key question raised in the court in regards to this appeal is the United Nations convention on the
treatment of children which the country is in agreement with but such was not incorporated in the
legal system as regards to detention and deportation of children. It has gone to exposes the lapses
and eventually reinforce the need for children to be treated

Immigration Laws In America
There is a big problem these days and it is immigration. There are estimated 11.4 million
unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. "Immigration is the act of moving from one country or region
to another for the purpose of settling there permanently." America's Immigration laws need to
change. Immigration laws today are not strict how they should be.
There is the right way to come into the United States and there is a wrong way. Back then
Immigration wasn't a huge thing but now a days it's harder to get allowed in so people sneak into the
U.S. If someone want's to come into the U.S they should have to and get approved to come into the
U.S instead of trying to sneak in. It is unfair for people who are trying to come into the U.S the right
way. Immigration is a popular topic right now especially because Donald Trump is now President of
United States of America. People who are citizen get jobs taken away from them because illegal
immigrants come in and work for low wage. They should change the law to if you want to come into
the U.S you should have to take the naturalization test and be able to speak english. For the number
of illegal immigrants maybe as high as 20 million people in the United States that's almost double
the official estimates of 11.1 million of the March 2005 Current Population Survey. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are more than 10 million undocumented immigrants currently in the United State. The Illegal
Immigration rate is growing by more than 700,000 a

Immigration Laws And Immigration Policies In The United...
Imagine for a minute the fear of losing everything that you have worked so hard to earn, think of
yourself waking up every day with the fear of everything being taken away from you after all of
your hard work and effort you have put in. That is the constant fear that thousands of immigrants go
through every day. It hurts to know that the Republican Party believes in immigration laws and
immigration reforms that address the needs of national security. The party has always been divided
on to exactly what extent immigration laws should be tightened, but as a whole the party believes
this system needs to be in place to ensure that immigrants who enter this country illegally are not
provided with the same benefits that legal citizens are. They believe in warmly welcoming those
who enter the country through legal methods. The party believes that amnesty towards those who
have broken immigration laws only encourage future immigrant to enter the country illegally rather
than legally. More people have died crossing the border from Mexico to the US in the first seven
months of 2017 compared to the year before, even though significantly fewer people seem to be
attempting the journey, according to the United Nations migration agency. The number of
immigrants deaths tailed at the border jumped 17% from 204 in the first seven months of 2016 to
232 immigrant's fatalities in 2017. The report does not identify what could be causing the change,
but historically, stricter immigration policies in the US have driven people to take more dangerous
routes. This is partially because these policies don't mitigate the factors the drive people to leave,
such as the threat of gang violence, crime and lack of economic opportunity. One of the reasons why
my parents decided to come to the United States was so that I and my three siblings could have a
better future. Also so we could have more education than my parents had to have a better chance in
life and better job opportunities. I admire my parents so much because I have witness every single
struggle they have been through trying to give us the best and also because they are humble and
strong as a family. That's one of the reasons why I decided to go to college is because I strive to

Anti Asian Immigration Laws Essay
Canada's Anti–Asian immigration laws as reviewed by 2015 standards
CLN4U
Wilson
Chiu
Canada has a bias towards eurocentric residents when it comes to immigrants. People hailing from
America, or European have the best chance at immigration, while those from South America, Africa
and Asia were given more hurdles to overcome( Makarenko).Canadian Immigrant laws deny Asian
refugees safety due to a racist perspective on their status of need, which leads to a second class life
should they make it to Canada. The Government has a history of racism towards Asians in Canada.
As shown through the Chinese Head taxing, the Japanese internment camps, and currently through
the rejection of North Korean refugees.
During World War two, threat ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This forces North Korean refugees to live in an unsafe environment; often times women are forced
into sex work to support their families. In China, a member of the United Nations refugee
convention, if reported to the authorities refugees are returned to North Korea where they will be
punished severely, as will their post mortem relatives for 7 generations (Nuttal). Otherwise, refugees
in China are faced with physical, mental and sexual abuse from the society for 'putting up' the
refugees. In South Korea refugees are considered leeches to the community, spies or otherwise
untreated, and if found out by the North Korean authorities, they are watched closely and can be put
on an unsafe list(

The Pros And Cons Of Immigration Laws
Immigration is a hot button topic today and so many people have different opinions about it, but
who oversees its laws? Our government is split into three main branches, Legislative, Executive and
Judicial. Every branch contributes in a different way to have a law in action. The Legislative branch,
which contributes to the first step of making any law, consists of the house of representatives and the
senate, which together form the United States Congress which have the supreme authority to enact
legislation, the privilege to confirm or reject many presidential appointments, and massive
investigative powers ("The Legislative Branch", 2017). The Executive branch, contributes to
enforcing the laws and it mainly involves the President of the United States, who also acts as head
of state and commander–in–chief of the armed forces. The President is responsible for implementing
and enforcing the laws written by Congress and, to that end, appoints the heads of the federal
agencies, including the Cabinet ("The Executive Branch", 2017). The Judicial branch, puts the final
touches on the law and polishes it. It consists of the United States Supreme Court and lower federal
courts. The Supreme Court's primary function is to hear cases that challenge the constitutionality of
legislation or require interpretation of that legislation ("The Judicial Branch", 2017). Immigration
laws are made within the Legislative branch, carried out by the Executive branch, and evaluated by
the Judicial

Racial Profiling And Immigration Law Enforcement
I. NEXT LECTURE ANNOUNCEMENT
A. Next week the professor will lecture about the final student essay [FSE]
1. She will provide some possible themes for each folder of readings
B. Will also review in next lecture: 1st peer review draft due 11/29, second peer review draft due
12/6.
II. LECTURE
A. Mary Romero (2006) "Racial Profiling and Immigration Law Enforcement"
 Thesis Paraphrase: Romero (2006), in her article titled, "Racial Profiling and Immigration Law
Enforcement" uses the case study approach of the "Chandler Roundup" in 1997 to analyze the use of
racial profiling by immigration law enforcement and to document the racial impact on both citizens
and undocumented immigrants.
1. Domestic Function of Immigration Policy
a. The author provides a brief history of immigration policy in order to determine what the domestic
function is.
b. The author talks about how we created the Texas and Arizona Rangers to do policing in
agriculture/ capitalist interests
(1) the INS rarely raided the fields during harvest time and scheduled massive immigration
roundups during periods of economic recession and union activity (they did not want to intrude on
the economic/agriculture business, so they will raid immigrants when they were not needed in the
field)
c. She points out on some of the hypothesis of the U.S. border policies, in the sense that when we
need their labor we let them in, but when we don't we deport them. So, what we really are doing is
paying for this illusion that we are

Arizona Immigration Law

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Christina Santos

More from Christina Santos (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Arizona Immigration Law