The Holocaust In The Diary Of Anne Frank

The Holocaust In The Diary Of Anne Frank
The Holocaust was important to world history between the years of 1939–1945 because it was a
tough time for jews and the whole world. Adolf Hitler was ordering all jews to get out of Germany
or be executed in death camps also called concentration camps. Many Jews went into hiding to
escape these tough times. In the play "The Diary Of Anne Frank" eight people that barely know each
other go into hiding in an attic for two years to escape these tough times. Anne Frank was born 1929
in Frankfurt Germany. January 1933: Adolf Hitler comes to power in Germany. Over the next few
months, all political parties, except the Nazi Party, are banned. Jews are dismissed from medical,
legal, government, and teaching positions.In the summer of 1933 alarmed
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Blackbeard Piracy Facts
Edward Teach, known by the nickname Blackbeard, was born in England, Bristol, 1680. Bourgoin
(Blackbeard). During his time, an age more formally known as the"Golden age of Piracy" was in
place; this was a time when piracy was abundant in the waters of the Caribbean and North America.
Pirates during this time were legally allowed to steal a certain group of ships, namely Spanish ships
(Woodward). These type of pirates were named either privateers, buccaneers, etc. Blackbeard was
one of them. Specifically, Edward Teach was a common combination of legal and illegal pirates.
The ferocious pirate Blackbeard was defined by his time as a privateer, a true pirate, and his death
(Blackbeard). First of all, privateers are people that steal ships for ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There were also seasonal patterns on Blackbeard's voyages. When it was warm, Blackbeard robbed
ships off the coast of Virginia and Carolina. He had a favorite spot to attack the ships, the Ocracoke
Inlet; he would anchor his ships in shallow waters that prevents other ships from attacking. As the
weather becomes colder, he sails to the south until he reaches the Caribbean (Blackbeard). The way
they attack the ships are by boarding onto the ship themselves. Usually, the people on the merchant
ship surrenders, but if they do resist, they will be promptly executed in a brutal manner (Minister).
When he is raiding ships, he would prioritize his crew's health first. The crew's health is so
important that he once demanded a box full of medicine from the governor of South Carolina or else
he would "murder all their prisoners, send up their heads to the governor, and set the ships they had
taken on fire." The government soon gave Edward a box of medicine (Jarus). This action is known
as the Charleston

How Bibery And Persuasion Affected Scotland's Decisions?
During 1714 George Lockhart memoirs were published which blamed over 30 Scottish people of
accepting bribes from Queen Anne during the Union Treaty negotiations between both England and
Scotland in 1706. Robert Burns then later immortalised these events in his poem "such a parcel of
rogues in a nation" which claimed that Scotland had been "bought and sold for English gold". This
outtake has persisted so much that it was used for the subject of Christopher Whitley's seminal work
during 1994. This essay will look further into how bribery and persuasion affected Scotland's
decision during 1688 until 1707.
In 1688, the Glorious Revolution replaced James II with William of Orange. The revolution came to
an end when James II had insisted that he would like Roman Catholicism reappointed as the ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, the Dutch and the English said that they wouldn't fund the venture so it was left to the
Scottish, both rich and poor, to raise the money that was needed. The first ship was set to take sail in
1698, they arrived at Darien having lost 70 people during the journey and many of them that did
make it were already sick and it went downhill from there because of the lack of food and the
attacks from the Spanish. Many native Indians felt sorry for the Scottish people and brought them
food but after seven months 400 of the Scottish people had died and many of them had diseases so
they decided to cancel the scheme. Unaware of the news, eleven more ships set sail in 1699 but only
one ship returned in total and only a few made it back home safe. £500,000 was lost which left them
almost bankrupt.
The Act of Succession was passed by the English in 1701 which stopped a Catholic succession to
the throne once Queen Anne had died. When Queen Anne had died, Sophie of Hanover was to take
on the responsibility of the

The Glorious Revolution Essay
The Glorious Revolution Some say the glorious revolution was one of the greatest landmarks in the
history of England. The glorious revolution is a very important event in history for multiple reasons.
It wasn't exactly a peaceful occasion but it was one in which no war of fight occurred. This was a
pleasant change for England at the time because they had been experiencing plenty of fights over the
throne and for once it was a relatively smooth transaction. After Charles the second died his brother,
James the second gained the throne in 1685. His main objective was to re–establish the Roman
Catholic religion in England. The people of England were mostly of a Protestant religion and they
did not want to change their ways. Oddly enough ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He practiced absolute monarchy and the people of England strongly disliked him. As things
continued to heated–up between parliament and Mary's father James II, she married the Dutch
Protestant prince, William of Orange. William desperately feared an alliance between James II and
the Catholic French King. William and Mary were prepared to lead armed forces into England and
take over the throne. When James' II second wife gave birth to a son who would be raised Catholic
and be the heir to the throne, Parliament got worried. Seven members of parliament signed a letter
asking Mary and William to bring an army and drive out James II. William arrived at Torbay, on
November 5th 1688 ready to fight for the throne. He was a brave man, for James II's army was
double the size of William's army. Although it didn't matter because James II's army was deserting to
the other side, James II army had abandoned him. When William of Orange was welcomed into
London, James II fled to France in disguise. Parliament claimed that by abandoning his country, the
king had abdicated and the throne was now left vacant. On February 6th 1689 Mary and William
became King and Queen of England. Perhaps the most revolutionary part of the Glorious Revolution
was that the throne had been taken over without a shot fired. But what this truly meant was the
ending of absolute monarchy in England. Now rulers had to abide by the laws of their country as
well as its people.

King Henry Viii's Accomplishments
Henry VIII
King of England from 1509–1547, Henry VIII had an exceptional life. He was famously married 6
times. Henry VIII was witty, highly educated, and had a love for music. Despite being good–
natured, Henry knew how to get what he wanted no matter the cost. Overall, Henry VIII was well
liked by his people and was determined to accomplish great things throughout his reign and lifetime.
The second son of King Henry VII and Elizabeth of York, Henry VIII was born on June 28, 1491 at
Greenwich Palace. He had 6 siblings, but only 3 survived. Their names were Arthur, Margaret, and
Mary. Henry was known for his love of hunting and dancing, along with music. After the death of
Arthur, his elder brother, in 1502, Henry VIII became ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He became unhealthy and as a middle–aged man, became covered with pus–filled boils and possibly
suffered from gout. The final years of his reign, Henry dealt with great physical decline along with
an increasing desire to appear all–powerful. He continued with fruitless and expensive campaigns
against Scotland and France. In 1540, Henry VIII got married yet again to a teenage girl named
Catherine Howard. The marriage was short lived, and Catherine was executed in 1542 for adultery
and treason because of an alleged affair with Henry's courtier, Francis Dereham. His sixth and final
marriage was to Catherine Parr. Catherine acted more as a nurse to him than a wife, and went on to
outlive

King Lear Research Paper
Through the rule of King James as he was pursuing the union of Scotland and England,
Shakespeare's tragedy appears to be reflective upon his political project. In "King Lear" it seems to
be reflective with his theory of Britain, the kings understandment of evils, and the similarities in
how the kinds reacted to anything that seemed to have evil power. When King James was pursuing
the Union of Scotland and England into the kingdom of Great Britain. James considered
Shakespeare to be one of the most powerful playwriters, Shakespeare came up with many of plays
to reflect off King James, but none as significant as "King Lear." The theory of Britain in "King
Lear" was a direct reflection to James's idea that England and Scotland are completely ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is through the kings worry with evil possession. Through James rule he had many examples of
his worries but one stuck out to me and it was with his worry of Anne Gunter. Anne Gunter was a
woman who was allegedly said to be woman with demonic possessions, so King James performed a
test of true and false to try to dim his worries of someone who may contain those kinds of features.
As of in "King Lear," King Lear was worried about his kingdom being over powered and his
daughters causing his kingdom to go down to one having more power than the other. So, King Lear
stated, "to shake all cares and business from our age. Conferring them on younger strengths, while
we unburdened crawl toward death (1.1. 40–43)." And King Lear also conducted a mock trail of his
absent daughter due to his worries of his kingdom. As he stated, "let them anatomize Reagan, see
what breeds about her heart. Is there any cause in nature that makes these hard hands (3.6. 60–63)."
As shown Shakespeare reflected upon King James by showing how they both are worried of the
people whom are closest to them and how they both worry about their kingdom being corrupt after
their

A Diary That Affected The World By Anne Frank
Anne Frank wrote a diary that affected the world by showing she was a normal girl who wanted to
be her true self. Her diary was the only place she could really be herself (Frank 1). Anne's dream
was that her diary would one day become a book. She wrote that she wanted to be famous and to
help others. Her influence on World War II was based on her life experiences in hiding, and her
diary.
Frank's life was full of hard times and persecution. She was born on July 12, 1929. She received her
famous diary on her 13th birthday, the same day of her very first diary entry (Frank 1). It was
wartime 1942 in Amsterdam and Adolf Hitler was at his height of power (Byers 36). Hitler had
given Germany the scapegoat they had been looking for: the Jews. World War II was raging across
Europe, making its way toward changing the life of Anne Frank. The Nazis had taken much of
Europe and there was barely a place the Jews could go without fear of being persecuted. The Nazi
special forces, the SS Army, had taken away many of the Jewish families in Amsterdam and were
offering a cash reward to anyone who turned in a Jew. The Nazis isolated the Jews from daily life:
They only allowed the Jews to walk, gave them a curfew, banned them from swimming and going to
the movies, and made them wear a yellow star so they could quickly be identified. Hitler fanned the
flame of an age–old prejudice until it exploded into a violent hatred (Lewis 4). The icing on the cake
for the Jews was when Hitler started

Inigo Jones And The Queens House
Throughout this essay I will explore to what extent Inigo Jones's design for the Queens House was
inspired by the works of Palladio and Palladian architecture and 15–16th century European
architectural precedents, while also exploring the role the building played on the development of
Neoclassical architecture on a wider scale. The Queens House represents the stylistic point of origin
for the great imposing buildings surrounding Greenwich but also for Neo–Classical architecture in
Britain more generally. The formative years of the designer, Inigo Jones (1573–1652) is largely
unknown although its believed he trained as a joiner and received no formal architectural education.
Its documented that in the year 1597 he visited Italy several ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Queens house, his first residential project gave him the chance to implement these ideas in
practice. Jones career was prolific, although a lot of what he created or modified has since
disappeared. Some of the buildings that remain include Banqueting Hall at Whitehall, the Queen's
Chapel at St James's Palace and St Paul's Church. He also consulted on the reconstruction of
Somerset House and the Covent Garden Piazza.
Palladian architecture is based on the symmetry and perspective of classical architecture,
particularly the temples of the Ancient Greeks and Romans. It was characterised by the use of
pediments and symmetry, and proportions that were based on mathematics rather than ornament.
"Palladian architecture is recognisable for its classical facades. Some of the defining features of
Palladianism include the use of Corinthian columns, decorative motifs such as masked faces and
scallop shells. Pediments used over doors and windows, both external and internal. Terms – free–
standing stones representing the head and upper torso of the Roman god Terminus, on top of a
pillar". Palladio, its founder "believed that a building and its decoration should be considered as a
whole". He particularly admired the monuments left by the ancient Greeks and Romans, and often
used the orders of classical columns in his buildings. Many of these architectural precedents

William And Mary Rule 1750-1910
William III of Orange, Stadtholder of the United Provinces of Netherlands, King of England,
Scotland, and Ireland(ruled 1689–1702) was born in Netherlands in 1650, and died in London.
Queen Mary II of England, Scotland, and Ireland was the daughter of King James born on 1662 who
ruled from 1689 to her death, 1694 (William). These two monarchs ruled England, Scotland, and
Ireland together in what was called the William and Mary rule. Their rule resulted in the formation
of the English Bill of Rights, creation of a more restricted monarchy, creation of the Cabinet system
of governance, creation of the Bank of England, formation of national debt, and the spark of the war
of Spanish Succession (William, Harris–William, Burkholder).
The rule of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was was caused by conflicting backings of a king for Spain. The end of this war promoted
English power and for the first time, promoted Britain as one of the major powers of Europe
(Burkholder, Harris–William). It also helped disrobe the power of the Catholic church within Europe
and outside of Europe, which was a large development that gave way to further expansion of the
Protestant faith. The war of spanish succession was started mostly because of two factors, including
the Anti–French, Anti–Catholic agenda of Queen Mary II and King William III, and the
establishment of the national bank in England (William, Harris–William, Harris–Glorious). The
Anti–French, Catholic agenda of the joint rulers was of great importance as it stripped away the
power of the Catholic church and greatly promoted the power of the states themselves. The
establishment of the national bank was also very important as it was the first occurance of a debt
based economy(William). The creation of the bank allowed for vast expansion of the British
Military which consequently lead to the expansion of the British kingdom, promoting the formation
of an empire, one of the most important concepts of this time

Freedom Of Religion In The British Colonies
The British Colonists traveled over into the New World for society to work out in their own favor.
However, this was not the case for these colonists; they carelessly came into the New World with the
intent of having their own freedom of religion, being culturally intertwined with the natives already,
and for their own overall independence economically . The British did not make a smooth
transformation into this New World when they first arrived over seas, they brought chaos not only to
the Natives but also the development of their colonies and themselves.
A plan for some of the colonists moving to the New World was freedom of religion, such as the
quakers (located in Pennsylvania) and pilgrims believed in the freedom of living off of your own
specific religion. The puritans on the other hand, settled in the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1629 ,
identified themselves as God's chosen pure angels because of their belief that they were born saved
into the world. They would also turn a blind eye to other denominations and focused on their church
to be an Angelic Catholic Church specifically. Which of course if you know anything about their
"home" back in Europe. That is their "main" denomination over in Britain and they do required
everyone to believe in. The puritans brought over their beliefs from England not trying to make it
into their own. For example in England they created various religious laws, that were put into place
over from England but now the laws transferred into

Essay on Great Britain Rise as the Global Leader of the...
When examining the bloody and often tumultuous history of Great Britain prior to their ascent to
power, one would not have predicted that they would become the global leader of the 18th century.
Prior to the Treaty of Westphalia, which ended the Thirty Years War, the Spanish and the Holy
Roman Empire held much of the power in Europe. Only with the suppression of Catholicism and the
development of national sovereignty did Great Britain have the opportunity to rise through the
ranks. While much of continental Europe was seeking to strengthen their absolute monarchies and
centralized style of governing, in the 17th and 18th centuries Great Britain was making significant
political changes that reflected the ideals of the Age of Enlightenment. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Under the Bill of Rights, Parliament would have a say over the direction the monarchy was taking
the country, that the royal power to suspend and eliminate laws was abolished, that the monarchs
were prohibited to levy taxes and the monarchy could not maintain a standing army in peacetime
without first going through Parliament (Glorious Revolution) . The addition of the Bill of Rights to
England's constitution pushed them forward into a political system not dominated by the interests
and whims of the monarchy. William and Mary not only changed the religious course of Great
Britain and the idea of divine right but also allowed the ideas of personal liberties and social
welfare, encouraged by the Enlightenment, to gain momentum. In addition, William and Mary
moved forward with their government by implementing new, modern economic policies which
placed more focus on the merchants of the time. While William and Mary were busy ruling the
British empire, John Locke was busy producing new ideas on how government should treat its
people and vice versa. Chiefly influenced by the political mishap that led to the Glorious
Revolution, Locke published his revolutionary work Two Treatises. In this essay, Locke argued that
the reason for the whole existence of governmental authority is to protect the civil liberties and
freedoms of the governed. Locke's named this agreement the "social contract" and stated

Edward Taylor And Anne Bradstreet
Throughout this class we have read different types of literature from many different authors. Some
of the material I truly enjoyed and some of it not so much. I really enjoyed the Native American
literature that we started out with in the beginning of the semester. I think the Native Americans are
beautiful people who appreciated the land more than most. The Native Americans were smart people
who used short stories such as The Chief's Daughters and Coyote and Bear to warn their readers of
dangers or teach them moral lessons. I also enjoyed authors such as Edward Taylor, Anne
Bradstreet, and Thomas Paine. I did not like reading William Byrd's material, chiefly because he
was rude and spoke nastily of the Native Americans. It personally offended me that he thought their
belief of afterlife to be "gross and sensual".
I have read material from many different authors and although I enjoyed most of them, I have to say
that my two favorites were Edward Taylor and Anne Bradstreet. Both of these authors are Puritans,
and it is easy to tell when reading their pieces. Puritans typically write in simple language, and
always refer to God. Edward Taylor created a powerful analogy in his piece, Upon a Spider
Catching a Fly. The analogy that he describes is an analogy between people and Satan. The spider
represents the devil, who is manipulative and wants to trap people in his web of sin. The wasp
represents someone who is strong in their faith and does not let themselves get trapped in

Revolution : The Glorious Revolution
The Glorious Revolution that occurred in 1688 to 1689 was a bloodless revolution in England that
was a turning point in modern history. The true glory of the revolution was that it contained no
massacre and that a settlement by consent was reached on the religious and political differences that
had divided parties for ages. A thinker during the time, John Locke came up with new models and
inspirations for the evolving concept of government. Locke argued that power came from the
people, not from a divine right to royal rule. Kings should therefore be restrained by institutions that
protected the public interest, including certain general rights to freedom and property. Therefore. a
more democratic form of government known as a limited monarchy replaced absolutism and at the
same time limited its power by the 1689 Bill of Rights. The revolution established the supremacy of
parliament over the crown that set Britain on the path towards constitutional monarchy and
parliamentary democracy (Maurice, 2017). The king and queen became figureheads, when before
they were absolute monarchs. In 1660, when Charles II was on the throne, Englishmen were
uncertain about the Stuarts and suspected him of Papal tendencies and absolutists learnings. Charles
II did not adhere to Parliament since he had favoring alliances with Catholic powers in Europe.
When Charles II died in 1685, Charles was succeeded by his brother James II, Duke of York. The
Whigs, a parliamentary group did not want a

Conflict With Spain Analysis
Conflict with Spain and Britain Many events that happened in history start with a conflict between
two people or countries. Everything that has happened in the past, trades, slavery, war, everything
good and bad, had to start with a plan or some sort of conflict. In this case, both Spain and Britain
were trying to colonize the land that belonged to the Indians. There were many causes that helped
lead to the conflict with Spain and Britain. The main causes of the conflict within Spain and
Britain's "New World" colonies include motives from the Spanish, the Virginia Company, and the
Puritans. The Spanish had several motives that added to the conflict. One of which was dealing with
the Indians. According to the "Requirement" article, the impact ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Puritans external conflict with gender issues added to the causes of the conflict within Spain
and Britain's "New World" colonies. It started with the Massachusetts Bay Colony Case against
Anne Hutchinson, she was a prominent Puritan dissenter and would argue with leaders. She
"claimed to have experienced direct revelations from the Holy Spirit that revealed which of her
neighbors had been saved and which were damned, including ministers" (FTR 47–48). By doing
that, Anne was put in front of the General Court who would say things about her gender that would
get a rise out of her and it worked. She got so worked up and started having revelations from God
which was blasphemy in the eyes of the orthodox

Walter Fitzalan Personality
Born about the year 1108 and growing up at Oswestry, Walter FitzAlan knew wealth, privilege, and
warfare. And he was quick to capitalize on his background. In his late twenties, Walter joined forces
with some of the most powerful Norman figures in England, engaging a series of battles in which
the throne of England was at stake. On one side was the claimant Stephen of Blois, and opposing
him Matilda (called "Maud"), the daughter of recently deceased King Henry I. In these contests,
Walter FitzAlan linked up with Scotland's King David and also with one of King Henry's sons
named Reginald Dunstanville, a half–brother of Maud [10]. Although their cause on behalf of Maud
was eventually lost, firm relationships between Walter FitzAlan, Reginald ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
David granted Walter the lands of "Kerkert" and "Strathgryffe" (much of the land of Renfrewshire)
and it was here, in Paisley, that Walter established his home. He built a structure called Blackhall
Manor that served him and his descendants for generations [12]. Blackhall served as an ancestral
home for subsequent generations of his family who served as hereditary stewards of Scotland. In the
centuries to follow these hereditary stewards ascended to the Scottish throne as kings, adopting the
surname Stewart for themselves and ultimately forming the Stuart dynasty that ruled Scotland,
Ireland, and England during the 17th century [13]. Thus Blackhall Manor can be thought a cradle of
kings, as the Stuart dynasty of Scotland and England find their beginnings in Walter FitzAlan at
Blackhall. Also at Paisley, Walter endowed a Cluniac monastery in Paisley in Renfrewshire,
importing monks from Shropshire, which monastery grew into Paisley Abbey in Walter's lifetime. In
later years Walter would be buried

Anne Frank: Positive Attitudes In War
Positive Attitudes in War Positive attitude: a positive outlook or feeling on a fact or state. Many
people believe sometimes reacting negatively is the best way to respond to a problem because it will
make that person feel better, or maybe even just scare the person or thought away. Sometimes, the
best way to react is to respond positively. According to studies, the best way to maintain health and
stay happy is to remain positive. Although conflicts can make somebody just freak out and have a
total temper tantrum, staying calm actually helps physically and mentally. Many of our own role
models show great magnitude of this act. For example, one of the most well–known role models,
Anne Frank, did this in Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The benefits don't only include the few minutes of feeling good, but include long–term benefits like:
future skills, development resources, and characteristics. According to Mayo Clinic, there are many
health benefits too. From their scientific research, reacting positively and having positive attitudes
can: increase lifespan, limit stress, lower the rates of depression, and increase coping skills. "One
study of 1,558 older adults found that positive thinking could also reduce frailty during old age"
(Cherry Paragraph 13). Not only can positive thinking help the brain and how humans think, but it
can actually help the physical well–being

Great Britain Dbq
During the early 1500s and mid 1600s western civilization went through major change with the
protestant reformation. One county that was affected by the reformation during this time was Great
Britain. Leading up to its reformation Great Britain had key factors within the english reformation
that distinguish it from the protestant reformation and its entirety. What makes this religious change
different is the cause of this event happening. Some historians like to blame or give credit to the
woman, Anne Boleyn, for the drastic change that occurred within England's church in the 16th
century. Saying that Boleyn was a reformist and wanted the protestant reformation to reach Great
britain. While others believe that Anne Boleyn was not influential in change of England's religious
change from catholic to anglicanism. After extensive research it is easy to see that there is no
evidence that can prove Anne Boleyn having responsibility for the dramatic ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The English Reformation was a detailed process, in 16th–century England, where the Church of
England broke ties with the authority of the pope and the Roman Catholic Church. It all began with
King Henry VIII marriage with Catherine of Aragon. After years of marriage Catherine had not
produced a male heir who survived into adulthood angering the King. With this in mind King Henry
will set his eyes own Anne Boleyn who was a maid of honor to Queen Catherine. By the late 1520s,
Henry wanted his marriage to Catherine annulled, claiming it to be invalid due to the fact that
Catherine was his late brothers wife making it wrong for Henry VIII to be allowed to marry her. In
1527 Henry asked the Pope, Pope Clement VII, to annul his marriage. The pope refused in fear of
the Queen's nephew, Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V. this

The Enlightenment And The Glorious Revolution
The Enlightenment is said to have begun in the 1680's, the same decade that the "Glorious
Revolution" occurred, which crowned daughter of James II Mary and her husband Prince William of
Orange Monarchs of England. This turning point in English history can be considered part of the
Enlightenment due to the switch from an Absolute Monarchy to a Constitutional Monarchy and the
passing of the English Bill of Rights in 1689 after William's ascension to the throne.
The passing of the English Bill of Rights ushered in a new age for England, giving the power of the
Monarchy to the Parliament, and banning the Monarch from adjourning Parliament or going against
the opinion of its majority. The Bill lists that many tyrannical actions that had previously been made
by many kings, such as levying money and suspending/revoking laws were illegal without the
consent of Parliament (Document 3), essentially giving Parliament control of the direction of
English law. The English Bill of Rights was ratified by William in 1689, which directly stated
multiple times that the ruler's power was to be checked by Parliament, thus inhibiting them from
exercising full power over the people, preventing tyranny. He states in Document 2 that he and his
wife Mary will "concur in everything that may procure the peace and happiness of [the] nation,
which a free and lawful Parliament shall determine... [and support] the securing of the whole nation
the free enjoyment of all their laws, rights, and liberties,

The Revolution of 1688
The Glorious Revolution, also known as the Revolution of 1688, refers to the events of 1688–1689.
These events eventually led to the overthrow of Catholic King James II and the ascension (of
William III and Mary II) to the English throne. These events also produced a significant shift in the
relationship between the monarchy and parliament. This paper will discuss the overthrow of King
James II, the rebellion and revolt and the consequences as well as the global effects of the
Revolution in order to explain the importance of this event in world history. James II, king of
England from 1685–1688, inherited a very strong position when he came to power. When James II
first came to the throne, he was not very well liked in the eyes of the people of Great Britain, simply
because he was a Roman Catholic King to an overwhelmingly Protestant nation. Like most
politicians, James made promises to protect the peoples personal beliefs. At the beginning of his
reign, James had promised to respect his subject's rights and liberties and protect the Protestant
establishment in the church. Despite these promises, James decided to advance the Catholic tenets
over the protestants. He did this by issuing dispensations to Catholics including the Test Act of
1673, promoting the public celebration of mass, forcing the universities to admit Catholics, issued a
Declaration of Indulgences and also engaged a campaign to pack Parliament so that he would be
able to establish Catholic tolerance by

Argumentative Essay Titled 'Stay Positive'
Stay Positive
Even if things may seem bad, you should always stay positive.
If you were in a horrible situation, what would you do?
You should always be positive no matter what situation you are in. Like Anne Frank when she was
in hiding and she had looked on the brighter side of their hiding place. Someone else who looked on
the brighter side of things was Winston Churchill. While the Axis powers were taking over Europe
Churchill kept Great Britain hopeful and calm. Anne Frank is well known for her diary which held
the information of the events that she had gone through while in hiding with her family. She had
died 1 week before the camps were liberated. Her diary holds the information of each day she was in
hiding. Each day had a more serious feeling, but she kept a positive attitude. When her family was
upset about the chiming of the western clock, but she had gotten used to it and had accepted it and
even though in her words ¨It may be damp and lopsided, but there's probably not a more
comfortable hiding place in all of Amsterdam. No, in all of Holland.¨ As we can see even though it
is damp and lopsided Anne Frank looks at the brighter things. Winston Churchill also looked on the
brighter side of things. He kept all of Great Britain ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Elie had kept calm during the holocaust in Auschwitz. Examples of him staying calm is when he and
his father were separated from his mother and his sister. This is a quote that shows how he stayed
positive. ¨Confidence soared. Suddenly we felt free of the previous night's' terrors. We gave thanks
to God.". This quote shows an example of hope. Hope is a form of positivity, so with that, it shows
Elie has had a positive attitude. He stayed positive and calm when he had a gold tooth taken away
and then found out it was pointless when he was killed for his side business of selling the teeth. He
had also kept calm when the bombs were dropped at

The British Government : Constitutional Monarchy
The current British government is a constitutional monarchy, where the monarch is the Head of
State, but only Parliament has the ability to make laws. This distribution of power originated during
the reign of the Stuarts. While absolute monarchs ruled the rest of Europe, the English Parliament
slowly forced the kings and queens to relinquish much of their power. However, limits on the power
of the monarchy were in place far before the Stuart dynasty. In 1215, King John signed the Magna
Carta and agreed to consult the Great Council, which later became Parliament, before raising taxes,
effectively giving Parliament the power of the purse. The conditions of the Magna Carta came into
conflict during the Stuart monarchy. Before the Stuarts, the Tudor family had good relations with
Parliament. When Henry VIII wanted to break away from the Catholic Church, Parliament passed
the Act of Supremacy and because of the many wars, he had to consult Parliament regularly to raise
taxes. After the Tudors, there were six Stuart monarchs, reigning from 1603 to 1714. James I did not
associate well with Parliament, unlike his Tudor predecessors. James, like many absolute rulers at
the time, believed he had a God given divine right to rule and thus did not appreciate Parliament's
role in his government. James and Parliament were in constant conflict over taxes and who had the
right to levy them. Parliament passed the Great Protestation, declaring it had freedom of speech and
superiority in

Is The Glass Half-Empty Or Half-Full?
Is the glass half–empty or half–full? An age old question that is more of a personality question
rather than just an opinion. Many people see the glass half empty, but should it actually be seen as
half–full? When someone faces any sort of conflict, they can approach it in many different ways.
Some methods work better than others, but one way has the most beneficial results. Facing conflict
with optimism inspires others, has health benefits, and is easier for the person to deal with the
problem.
Having an optimistic attitude inspires others to be hopeful. There are many resources that show
having a hopeful attitude makes people around them feel more comfortable. Winston Churchill
wrote a speech convincing the citizens of Great Britain that they needed to remain confident in him
and their government that the war could be won. He started by describing how hard Great Britain
was going to work to defeat the evils ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
– Health Encyclopedia – University of Rochester Medical Center. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Apr. 2017.
Churchill, Winston. "Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat." Studysync: Reading & Writing Companion.
Sonoma, CA: BookheadEd Learning, LLC, 2015. 367–68. Print.
Conversano, Ciro, Alessandro Rotondo, Elena Lensi, Olivia Della Vista, Francesca Arpone, and
Mario Antonio Reda. "Optimism and Its Impact on Mental and Physical Well–Being." Clinical
Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health : CP & EMH. Bentham Open, 2010. Web. 6 Apr. 2017.
Frank, Anne. "Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl." Studysync: Reading & Writing Companion.
Jackson, Brian K. "JavaScript." All–important Attitude. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Apr. 2017.
"Mindfulness and Positive Thinking." Pursuit of Happiness. N.p., 10 Sept. 2016. Web. 28 Mar.
2017.
Publications, Harvard Health. "Optimism and Your Health." Harvard Health. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Mar.

Essay on Adolf Hitler and The Nuremberg Race Law
Adolf Hitler was an Austrian man who fought in World War I (WWI) as a German soldier. After
Germany's defeat, Hitler tried to illegally take over the government. He was promptly arrested, and
was sentenced to five years in prison. He only served nine months. In that time, Hitler wrote a book
titled "Mein Kampf", whch translates to "My Struggle". In "Mein Kampf", he speaks of his ideas for
Germany's future, which he titled the "Final Solution". After his release, Hitler joined the Nazi party,
and a few years later, he controlled it. He slowly gained power in the German government, and in
1933, he was appointed chancellor of Germany. He eventually removed the position of president in
Germany (after the previous president's death), which left ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Hitler and the rest of the Nazi party created camps to hold, imprison, or kill the undesirables. In
extermination camps, people were herded into gas chambers where they would be gased to death
with Zyklon B. Auschwitz, one of the largest death camps, killed up to 10,000 people per day.
If an undesirable had not been sent to an extermination camp, they'd be sent to transit camps,
concentration camps, or labor camps. In these camps, they would do work to aid the war effort or do
hard labor, like digging ditches. Upon arrival, people were stripped of valuables or anything that
individualized them. They had numbers tattooed on their skin for easy recognition. People in these
camps were crowded, starving, and many had contagious diseases that eventually would kill them.
The prisoners were heavily guarded, and if they disobeyed, they would promptly be shot or taken to
a gas chamber. People were selected to move from camp to camp, and they would be transported in
crammped cattle cars. When arriving at new camps, they were often separated from family
members, never to see them again.
World War II (WWII) began in 1939 when Nazi Germany invaded Poland. The Tripartite Pact was a
pact that created an alliance between Germany, Italy, and Japan, forming the Axis powers. Later that

How Did Thomas Cromwell Influence European Society
Thomas Cromwell, Jean–Baptiste Colbert and William Pitt each influenced their country and
changed the course of European history in their own way. Thomas Cromwell, often regarded as a
corrupt and ruthless politician, was also a dedicated evangelical, who's ideologies and determination
changed England's religious biases forever. Cromwell was one of the most powerful and influential
figures of the 16th century, his masterful skills of manipulation allowed him rise all the way from
the bottom of social hierarchy to almost having king like power. Jean–Baptiste Colbert was a trusted
advisor to Louis XIV and a master of finance and mercantilism. He made France's economy more
unified and less chaotic. By creating standards and enforcing deadlines, Colbert was able to bring
France up to a place of prestige and wealth that had ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Henry VIII was having trouble conceiving a male child with his current wife: Katharine of Aragon.
Henry wanted the current pope to give him an annulment so Henry could marry Anne Boleyn.
Wolsey was unsuccessful in his attempts due to interference from Katharine. This led Henry to lose
trust in Wolsey and led to his eventual fall from grace and death in 1529. Cromwell was able to
distance himself enough from Wolsey that when he fell, he did not take Cromwell with him. This
left Cromwell in the perfect position to fill the space that Wolsey left empty. Through a series of
events, the king enlisted Cromwell to use his legal skills to convince parliament to create laws that
undermine the authority of the pope, allowing Henry to divorce Katharine without the pope's
permission. Henry VIII was wildly impressed by Cromwell success, Cromwell was granted the title
"Master of Jewels" and invited to the English court. This complicated situation is largely responsible
for Cromwell's initial rise to power. (MacCulloch, Borman

Was The Second World War?
The Second World War was something that mankind would not expect to see in regards to such
devastation the war would bring compared to the First World War and the new political ideas that
would arise during the period of 1914–1945 such as fascism, communism and 'social democracy'. It
was such a horrific conflict seen in human history in terms of the number of deaths, both civilian
and military deaths combined. With battles raging across the globe particularly in Europe, North
Africa and to the Far East in Asia, people feared for their lives and didn't know what darkness this
terrible war would bring to them especially for the Jewish people living in Europe.
The war was divided into two sides. One being the Axis powers which included ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The lead up to the Second World War happened in 1936 when Adolf Hitler, Führer to the German
people, moved his troops into the demilitarised zone in the Rhineland, West of Germany. Once he
controlled the region, his next plan would be to annex Austria in 1938 and later in the same year,
Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia consisting of German minorities was also annexed by the Germans.
Britain and France accepted the 'Anschluss' of Austria as it was a German speaking country and the
Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia was also resolved by France and Britain at the Munich Agreement.
In 1939, Hitler broke the Munich Agreement with France and Britain leading to him occupying most
of Czechoslovakia. The last roll of the dice occurred when Hitler signed a non–aggression pact with
the Soviet Union, meaning that he could invade Poland in which he had no hesitation in doing so. As
a result, these actions triggered the beginning of the Second World War.
So why did Hitler believe that he was doing the right thing? That his actions were for the greater
good? Why did he believe that Germany deserved more? What was his end goal for Germany if he
succeeded? All these questions have many different answers and beliefs from historians on what
they think about Adolf

Nintendo Australia
Question 1 Memorandum of Advice for Nintendo Australia Introduction Character merchandising
has become one of the most popular businesses in the market place. Therefore the tort of passing off
has been expanded by the common law, to protect the owners of fictional characters. Under the
section of unauthorised character merchandising, Nintendo Australia will have legal rights to assert
against Beta Bar for using the characters from Pokémon to promote their events. Passing off Three
elements should be satisfied, for a plaintiff to be successful in the tort of passing off. Reputation or
goodwill of the plaintiff is the first element and the plaintiff should be able to prove that they have
gained reputation among potential customers and in the minds of customers in some sort of a trade
indicia. The next element will be misrepresentation, where the plaintiff should prove that the
defendant relied on the reputation of the plaintiff and tried to mislead customers in the market.
Misrepresentation to affiliation, sponsorship or licencing, mere association and misappropriation are
the three ways of misrepresentation in character merchandising. In other words, the customers
should be confused and mislead into thinking that there is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Therefore it is unlikely for Pokémon to not have establish a reputation in Australia and also around
the world as they have been in the industry for almost 20 years. These four characters had been
released in the US in 1998 and it still continues to be popular among customers, is one of the factors
that can prove reputation for Pokémon. Moreover with the increasing number of sales and earnings
Pokémon brand alone has achieved for the company, very well proves that reputation has been
established for these characters in the market. Advertising budget and use of the Pokémon characters
in a cartoon can also proof that they have been able to establish

What Divided Whigs and Tories in the Reigns of William Iii...
Jack Wilson
What divided Whigs and Tories in the reigns of William III and Queen Anne (1688–1714)?
The early days of the new reign of King William III of Orange and his wife Queen Mary II were
overshadowed by uncertainty. Could James II hasty departure be treated as abdication? If so by
which means– mere physical absence or a violation of fundamental laws? And what kind of steps
should be made to ensure such monarchic contractual failures didn't occur again?
Such questions were a true cause of glory in the "Glorious revolution". People with incompatible
views, despite the passion of beliefs and the heat of the moment, where driven together in pursuit of
a compromise through diplomacy. This uncertainty, arising as a result of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
But their support was not confined to the countries gentry: the party garnered strong backing in
backward, agrarian regions as well as small market towns[9]. The Whigs were largely associated
with the nouveau riche: those who lacked aristocratic lineage but had acquired considerable wealth
within their generation, usually through their own exploits and endeavour. This included the
substantial number of merchants, financiers and monopolists that emerged during William and
Anne's reigns. The party was also strong in budding industrial areas and amongst religious
dissenters[10].
Although it may not seem like such on first inspection, the principles adopted by Whig and Tory
upon William's succession to the throne in 1689 followed much the same pattern as those adopted
during the Exclusion Bill crisis of 1678–1681. Just as in the exclusion crisis the Whig's stance
hinged entirely upon their religious beliefs. Like Charles II, James II and his newborn Stuart heir
were Roman Catholic. All Whigs were united by the unwavering belief that Roman Catholics,
regardless of their lineage, should not under any circumstances be in possession of the throne[11].
Such a scenario, in their eyes, would endanger Protestant religion, liberty and property. This
principle was not totally unshared by the Tories. However, in the case of William, it was severely
undermined by other staunch Tory beliefs– namely their belief in indefeasible hereditary succession,
non–resistance and passive

The War between Scotland and England in the Reign of...
Why did War break out between Scotland and England in the Reign of Edward I?
On the 14th of May 1264, the forces of Simon de Montfort, Gloucester and the Londoners were set
arrayed against the loyalist forces of King Henry III, Richard of Cornwall and Prince Edward (later
to become King Edward I). The loyalists suffered a massive defeat at this Battle of Lewes and
among those captured, aside from Richard of Cornwall and perhaps the King (Prestwich indicates
the unsure nature of the King's capture 46), were the northern barons (Scottish lords) of Balliol,
Bruce and Comyn. (Jenks 132) Prince Edward also became a hostage as part of an exchange after
the battle. These same men who fought together and were held captive by the de Montforts ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of these four advisors was John Balliol, father of the future King of Scotland. (Prestwich 26) It
is quite clear that, "[families] notable in Scottish history were also notable in England... The
Bruces... were a Yorkshire family, and the Robert Bruce who was Balliol's rival for the Scottish
crown in 1292 had served Henry III for twenty years and ended... as chief justice of the English
court of king's bench." (Miller 4) Given that such relationships so closely tied the English and the
Scottish leaderships war was far from anyone's agenda. However, during this time it was not
uncommon even for close relationships to digress towards war. Family lines were built with
strategic marriages to link families together, but they could just as easily lead to arguments and even
war, specifically resulting from such strategic partnerships (or lack there of).
Alexander II King of Scotland had been married to Joan, younger sister to Henry III, but later
married Mary of Coucy (daughter of a great French house) after Joan's death. This new marriage
offended Henry III, not least of all because he was trying to recover French land (Poitou) and gain
respect in continental Europe. (Powicke 586–7) To prevent war a new treaty was made giving the
King of Scots more power, but at the same time asking him not to enter into any alliances hostile to
England. This treaty was cemented by the marriage of Alexander (son of Mary and King Alexander
II, who died before the

Revolutionary War Without The Pamphlet Common Sense By...
The freedom of press sounds like one of the things we shouldn't be focused on, especially with
everything else that is going on in our world. Why exactly is this an important freedom? I have
always found it to be a little bit strange that we are protecting the right to say hateful things about
people you barely know. It doesn't sound like it should be as important as things like torture or
murder. Sometimes words can hurt, but they can also be used to do great things. Think about all of
the influential books, newspapers, and websites that have helped to change the world for the better.
Our country would have never won the Revolutionary War without the pamphlet "Common Sense,"
by Thomas Paine. He used his knowledge of the country's issues with

The Enlightenment And Enlightenment : The Causes Of The...
In the 1600's the reign of James II in England with his emphasis on Catholic practices and the
censorship of mail motivated English Parliament to undertake a journey to the Netherlands in search
of new leaders by the names of William and Mary. Their arrival in England prompted James II to
abdicate his throne. This further propelled the period of William and Mary's reign otherwise known
the Glorious Revolution. Additionally, it put forth a new period of constitutional monarchy, religious
toleration, and peaceful succession in England. The Glorious Revolution of 1688 led to the
Enlightenment because, William of Orange promoted and protected religious toleration and a
constitutional monarchy. Furthermore, the majority of English Protestants agreed with William of
Orange's stance and allowed the Glorious Revolution to further inspire them as enlightened thinkers.
However, William was still heralded as a king and the people of England nevertheless portrayed him
an absolute monarch.
One of the main ways that the Glorious Revolution promoted enlightened thought was through
William and Mary's emphasis on religious toleration and constitutional monarchy. In, King William
III's declaration, he expressed a vow to preserve each person's right to practice different religions in
an effort to preserve peace in England. He placed emphasis on civil rights and a person's freedom
within a just government. He assumed that through a person's freedom and their happiness lay the
key to a secure

Persuasion Courtship Essay
Courtship and its effect on Characters in Persuasion
In Jane Austen's Persuasion, she examines life among the 19th–century landholding elite in Britain,
and the proposition of marriage between several couples creates a dynamic social atmosphere.
Austen's novel centers around Anne Elliot, the unmarried daughter of a Baronet, however, there are
several auxiliary characters that play into the social atmosphere of courtship and marriage. These
characters give the reader an insider look into the complexities of courting during the period. The
experience of courtship develops the characters of Persuasion by putting them in hyper–realistic
social settings for the time.
Henrietta Musgrove and Charles Hayter's relationship sheds light on Charles' character. ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When hearing the news of their engagement, Anne thinks, "Captain Benwick and Louisa Musgrove!
The high–spirited, joyous–talking Louisa Musgrove, and the dejected, thinking, feeling, reading,
Captain Benwick, seemed each of them everything that would not suit the other." (Austen 156).
Anne is in utter shock to hear that these unlikely lovers are set to marry each other. During Anne's
time in Lyme, she discovers that Benwick is a mature, well–read man who reads only poetry and
Louisa is a foolish young girl who nearly killed herself by jumping off of a seawall. The discovery
of their engagement surprises Anne because she could not believe that such an unlikely pair could be
a good match. Later she says with a tone of realization, "Louisa, just recovering from illness, had
been in an interesting state, and Captain Benwick was not inconsolable." (Austen 156). The narrator
insinuates that their engagement is a product of being bored in a city with nothing to do. These two
rely on each other almost entirely as Louisa heals Benwick's emotional brokenness from the death of
his late wife, while Benwick helps to heal Louisa's injured body and mind. They are not necessarily
a perfect match, but they fulfill each other's needs

How Perseverance Has Changed People's Life
Perseverance has changed many people's lives and people have even made livings from persevering.
Perseverance is doing something despite difficulty, or delay in achieving success. Anne Frank ,
Steve Jobs and Derek Redmond are all examples of people who persevered to succeed in what their
goals were. Anne Frank is probably one of the most known person for perservening. She spent
almost 2 years in an attic with 7 other people, to hide from the Nazis who were taking over many
countries. Anne, despite everything happening, she still found ways to do her school work and all of
her lessons. She also did all of her chores while also overcoming all of the odds, she wrote a journal
about all the things that have changed in her life about the

Examples Of Hope In Conflict
Strength and Hope in Conflict How could a circumstance change by showing hope or strength
throughout? What really happens when people show courage and are optimistic when faced with a
life or death situation? There are many events and stories throughout history that show someone
having courage or hope, Anne Frank, Winston Churchill, and Elie Wiesel to name a few. They were
all facing the same conflict, World War II and the tyrannous reign of Hitler and his Nazis. They all
showed hope, courage, and faith in some of the hardest times of their lives, and it ultimately
changed how their lives, and countless other lives, were continued. Winston Churchill was faced
with an immense obstacle to overcome. He had just recently been appointed as the Prime Minister
of Great Britain, and during this time World War II was just beginning. Churchill had to decide what
route he would take for war. In his speech labeled "Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat", he declares to
Parliament that "without victory there is no ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Whether they don't have very much time left to live, like Anne Frank, or they go on to live a long,
prosperous life, like Elie Wiesel, a positive outlook on life can change everyone else's outlooks too.
Works Cited
Churchill, Winston. "Blood, Toil, Sweat, and Tears." Studysync: Reading & Writing Companion.
Sonoma, CA: BookheadEd Learning, LLC, 2015. N. pag. Print.
Connolly, Kate. "Tales from Auschwitz: Survivor Stories." The Guardian. Guardian News and
Media, 26 Jan. 2015. Web. 24 Apr. 2017.
Frank, Anne. "Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl." Studysync: Reading & Writing Companion.
Harran, Marilyn. "Yom Kippur in Auschwitz: 70 Years Ago." Holocaust Education. Chapman
University, 2 Oct. 2014. Web. 14 Apr. 2017.
Wiesel, Elie. Night. New York, NY: Hill and Wang, a Division of Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013.

A Brief Look at World War II
World War II World War II was the largest war and the bloodiest war that the U.S. has ever been
involved in. Forty to Fifty million people lost their lives during World War II. This was a war that
lasted for about six years and involved countries from around the whole world. The axis powers in
the war consisted of Germany, Italy, and Japan. The Allie powers consisted of the United States,
France, Great Britain, the Soviet Union, and to a lesser extent, China. It is said that unsettled
disputes from the first world war, World War I, is what was the main cause of WWII. Japan trained
men for the war starting at the age of nine years old. It is said that of all the Soviet men that were
born in the year 1923, only twenty percent survived the war. This means eighty percent of all males
died in the war. That's from one country, imagine how many innocent lives were taken during the
war. All because of one man, Adolf Hitler. The war stemmed off in early 1939 when German
dictator Adolf Hitler had intentions of invading Poland. Poland knew about this, so they went to
France and Britain for an alliance should Germany invade them. When Germany heard about this,
they decided it would be good to take out the Soviets because they didn't know if they would fight
on Poland's side or not. On August 23, 1939, Germany and the Soviets signed the German–Soviet
Nonaggression pact. This stated that once Poland was taken over, the country would be divided
evenly between the two power countries.

Causes Of The Glorious Revolution
The Glorious Revolution of 1688 was a time of enlightened thinking and establishing a new
principle of dividing power within the monarchy. With the emergence of philosophical thinkers,
such as John Locke, the idea of separation of powers and rationalism formed the foundation for our
modern use of a constitutional democracy. During this time period, James II was just expelled from
the throne, with William III and Mary taking over the throne. James II was a Catholic absolute
monarch who was religiously intolerant. James II violated the Test Act, which were a series of
English penal laws that served as a religious test for public office and imposed various civil
disabilities on Roman Catholics. He did this by giving government and university jobs to Catholics.
Fear of the Catholic monarchy led to the expulsion of James II, which then led to the beginning of
the Glorious Revolution. The Glorious Revolution was a time of unity within the English
Parliament. This Revolution established the principle that power should be divided between the
King and the Parliament, similar to a checks and balances system. This was established to ensure
that one individual could no longer oppressively rule over the monarchy. During 1688, James II was
just expelled from the position of ruler of England. Evelyn, a writer and founding member of the
Royal Society of London, reports events that are occurring in England under the rule of James II.
Evelyn specifically focuses on the current

Blood, Toil, Tears And Sweat By Winston Churchill
Every morning when people wake up, they face a new day filled with the challenges of life. These
challenges come in many forms. Many of the challenges people face can be solved and overcome;
however, others may be difficult or even impossible to solve. As people endure the challenges they
cannot solve, it is important to remember that a positive attitude will help anyone successfully
endure challenges they face in life. Research has confirmed and the book The Diary of Anne Frank
and the speech "Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat" by Winston Churchill are proof that the best way to
respond to conflict is to maintain a positive attitude and focus on the task at hand. Things in life can
change in the blink of an eye. The life of Anne Frank, for instance, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Barbara Fredrickson is a positive psychology researcher at the University of North Carolina and she
published a landmark paper that provides surprising insights about positive thinking and its impact
on the lives of people. Her work is among the most referenced and cited in her field. She tested the
impact of positive emotions on the brain by setting up an experiment. During this experiment, she
divided her research subjects into 5 groups and showed each group different film clip. The first two
groups saw clips that created positive emotions, the third group saw images that were neutral and
produced no significant emotion, and the last two groups were shown clips that created negative
emotions. At the end of the experiment, participants who experienced positive emotions could think
of more possibilities in life; showing that positive emotions broaden the sense of possibility and
even open the mind up to more options. In her paper, "The Broaden–and–Build Theory of Positive
Emotions", Barbara Fredrickson concludes, "Positive emotions promote discovery of novel and
creative actions, ideas and social bonds, which in turn build that individual's personal resources;
ranging from physical and intellectual resources to social and psychological resources."
(Fredrickson, p. 1367 ) The lives of Anne Frank and Winston Churchill are proof

Peter And Anne Frank's Relationship Essay
Compare and contrast Anne's relationship with her mother to that with her father.
Anne's relationship with her mother is very different then with her father Anne has a very good
relationship with her father she always wants him around when there is a problem. Anne thinks that
her father understands her,Anne doesn't think her mother understands her,she thinks that she is
wrong about the things she says. Anne rejects her mother usually. Anne always listens to her father.
In the play Anne pushes her mother away when she try's to comfort her when she had a bad dream.
Anne i think secretly loves her mother the way she is she just doesn't admit it.
Compare and contrast the relationship between Anne and Peter at the beginning of the play and later
on in the play. Anne's relationship with Peter in the beginning of the play is very quiet because peter
doesn't really talk to Anne he just says a couple of words then walks away. They aren't really close
in the beginning,Peter is shy in the beginning also. Later in the play peter starts to warm up to Anne,
starts talking more to her. Peter and Anne actually ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
What did she plan to become in the beginning of the play? What is she planning to become now?
Why does she "think more seriously about life." Anne's plans have changed for the future by she
wanted to be a dancer actress, wanted to be famous. In the beginning of the play Anne wanted to be
famous. Now she is planning on being a writer she thinks it suits her because of her writing in her
diary. She thinks more seriously about life now because her body is changing and because her life is
on the line. I think Anne is doing the right thing by thinking more seriously about life because she is
getting older and changing and should think like this. If i were Anne i would be thinking the same
things as she is right now. I think it is great that Anne has been holding on and not letting everything
that is going on bring her

Essay On The American Colonies
The American Colonies for the past 20 years have become accustomed to living a thousand miles
from their sovereign, the King of England and Parliament. This separation from "monarchial"
control and power has created a tough and independent society, which although they believe
themselves to be subjects of the crown, has molded an experience and lifestyle unlike any found
within the "Crown's" realm. Subsequently, these differences in lifestyles bond both Mother Country
and colony on a path that veers from the typical empirical rule that has ruled the known world for
the last century.
The journal asks what possible reasons Americans could have to begin to quarrel over our identity
with the crown. We are not defiant because we simply have nothing else to do; rather we are defiant
because we have been stepped on countless amounts of times by "Parliament (specifically, the
House of Commons)" that insist that they are "the guardians of British constitutional liberty" only
because of their victorious efforts against the "tyranny of the Stuart kings of England." Yet, their
understanding of a constitution is so much more different that they continue the same practices of
the Stuarts.
Take, for example, the nonsensical use of authority to create laws that exerts extensive pressures on
American families, such as the passing of the General Writs of Assistance Case in 1761. The writ
allows British government officials the general right to search and seize colonist's private property

The Holocaust In The Diary Of Anne Frank

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Carolina Lewis

More from Carolina Lewis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Holocaust In The Diary Of Anne Frank