2. ray transfer matrix, that which opens the possibility of other assemblies only with the consideration of the
elements of the ray transfer matrix system and the application of the mathematical condition found in this
paper.
THE FRACTIONAL FOURIER TRANSFORM AND THE GENERALIZED
COLLINS FORMULA
The well-known Collins formula can be rewritten as:
UP (u; v) =
−i
¸B
exp
Ã
i¼D
¡
u2
+ v2
¢
¸B
!
Z
R2
Z
R2
exp
Ã
i¼A
¡
»2
+ ´2
¢
¸B
!
exp
µ
−2i¼ (u:» + v:´)
¸B
¶
UA (»; ´) d»d´ (1)
From this expression a conventional standard Fourier transform (® = 1)[5] multiplied by a factor phase;
between the output field complex amplitude UP (u; v) in the plane P and the input field complex amplitude
UA (»; ´), in the plane A can be obtained if and only if A = 0.
Furthermore illuminating with spherical wave of radius R1
A and introducing appropriate input and output
scale parameters; by making use of the fractional Fourier transform and comparing with (1) the following
expression is obtained:
UP (u; v) =
2¼sen®
i¸ (B)
exp
⎡
⎣
⎛
⎝D
B
−
cos2
®
A
³
1 − B
R1
´
B
⎞
⎠
i¼
¡
u2
+ v2
¢
¸
⎤
⎦
h
exp
h
−i
³¼
4
−
®
2
´ii2
F®
[UA (»; ´)] (2)
An interesting fact is that exist a fractional Fourier transform F(®)
relation of order ® between the output field
complex amplitude UP (u; v) and the input field complex amplitude UA (»; ´). The phase factor is associated
in paraxial approach with a divergent wave; therefore the field complex amplitude over the output UP (u; v)
is over spherical surface with radius R2 and proportional to the fractional Fourier transform of order ® of
the input field complex amplitude UA (»; ´)[6,7]. Where:
R2 =
−AB
³
1 − B
R1
´
AD
³
1 − B
R1
´
− cos2®
(3)
This relationship establishes the general obtainment condition of a fractional transform between emitter and
spherical detectors when is known the ray transfer matrix of the optical system and their physical meaning
it corresponds to the presence of the Huygen’s principle. for the particular case of emitter flat R1 → ∞, the
fractional Fourier transform is over a spherical surface with raidus R2 = −AB
AD−cos2® .
In the general form; when it is wanted to obtain receptor flat, the fractional Fourier transform of orfer ® can
be obtained illuminating with spherical emitter of radius R1 calculated of:
AD
µ
1 −
B
R1
¶
= cos2
® (4)
In the particular situation to obtain a fractional Fourier transform [8] over the plane surface its necesary
that B different to zero, ® different to zero and:
164
3. AD = cos2
® (5)
That which means that if one knows the elements of the ray transfer matrix, one can obtain the condition
of the optic system for which the fractional Fourier transform is reached.
In summary the fractional Fourier transfom provides a compact and powerful formulation for wave propa-
gation in an optic system whose ray transfer matrix it is known.
THE TRANSFER MATRIX FOR SCALED FRACTIONAL FOURIER
TRANSFORM IN THE WAIST-TO-WAIST TRANSFORMATION OF A
GAUSSIAN BEAM
Assume an incident optical field is:
UA (»; ´) = exp
"
−
¡
»2
+ ´2
¢
w2
01
#
(6)
Figure 1. Transformation of a Gaussian beam passing through a thin lens.
The whole transfer matrix is:
Ã
1 − d2
f d1 + d2 − d1d2
f
− 1
f 1 − d1
f
!
UP (u; v) =
2¼sen®
i¸
³
d1 + d2 − d1d2
f
´
h
exp
h
−i
³¼
4
−
®
2
´ii2
F®
"
exp
"
−
¡
»2
+ ´2
¢
w2
01
##
(7)
The former analysis leads to a classical result, the resonator stability condition:
µ
1 −
d2
f
¶ µ
1 −
d1
f
¶
= cos2
® (8)
By Equation (8) we have:
d1 = f
⎡
⎣1 −
cos2
®
³
1 − d2
f
´
⎤
⎦ (9)
165
4. Inserting the scaled variables » ⇒ − u
f
∙
1− cos2 ®
¡
1−
d2
f
¢
¸
¸
y ´ ⇒ − v
f
∙
1− cos2 ®
¡
1−
d2
f
¢
¸
¸
into Equation (9), one obtains:
using the beam Gaussian beam inavariance to the fractional Fourier transform:
UP (u; v) =
2¼sen®
i¸
³
d1 + d2 − d1d2
f
´
h
exp
h
−i
³¼
4
−
®
2
´ii2
⎡
⎢
⎢
⎢
⎣
exp
⎡
⎢
⎢
⎢
⎣
−
¡
u2
+ v2
¢
w2
01f2
∙
1 − cos2 ®
¡
1−
d2
f
¢
¸2
¸2
⎤
⎥
⎥
⎥
⎦
⎤
⎥
⎥
⎥
⎦
(10)
The Equation (10) can be written as:
UP (u; v) =
2¼sen®
i¸
³
d1 + d2 − d1d2
f
´
h
exp
h
−i
³¼
4
−
®
2
´ii2
"
exp
"
−
¡
u2
+ v2
¢
w2
02
##
(11)
The resulting output waist radii of Gaussian beams at the output plane can be expressed by:
w2
02 = f2
¸2
⎡
⎣1 −
cos2
®
³
1 − d2
f
´
⎤
⎦
2
w2
01 (12)
Now let us consider some particular cases:
When ® = ¼
2 ; d1 = d2 = f; Then:
UP (u; v) =
2¼
i¸f
∙
exp
µ
−
u2
+ v2
w2
02
¶¸
(13)
Where:
w02 = f¸w01 (14)
When ® = 0; d1 = d2 = 0 Then:
UP (u; v) = exp
"
−
¡
u2
+ v2
¢
w2
02
#
(15)
Where:
w02 = w01 (16)
When ® = ¼; 1
d1
+ 1
d2
= 1
f parity operator, then:
UP (u; v) = exp
"
−
¡
u2
+ v2
¢
w2
02
#
(17)
The resulting output waist radii of Gaussian beams can be expressed by:
166
5. w02 =
⎡
⎣−
¸d2
³
1 − d2
f
´
⎤
⎦w01 (18)
We know, a thin lens is extensively used on the transformation of Gaussian beams for focusing or mode
matching. The above results give us a direct relation between the beam waist radius and the parameters of
lens (focusing length, and position). The above analyses [9,10] have shown that:
1. A beam waist in the front focal plane always produces a beam waist in the back focal plane.
2. When d1 = d2 = 0; we have shown that the width of the waist produced by the lens, the right minimum
beam width is obtained.
3. When d1 = d2 = f; the right maximum beam width is obtained.
4. When d1 = d2 6= 0 and d1 = d2 6= f; always produces inverted beam width.
5. When d1 = d2 and f
2 ≤ d1 < f; always produces a image that increases of size when d1 tends a focal
distance.
6. When d1 = d2 and 0 < d1 < f
2 ; always produces a image that decreases of size when d1 approaches the
position of the lens.
Examinations of equation (18) shows that beam waists are not imaged into beam waists in the usual
sense, as the initial waist is moved toward the lens, the second waist may also move toward the lens rather
than away from it as we might expect from normal image considerations.
CONCLUSIONS
In this paper we have analyzed the beam waist-to-waist transformation of Gaussian beam between input
and output reference planes by the scaled fractional Fourier transform. In other words,the waist-to-waist
transformation of the Gaussian beams is just a scaled fractional Fourier transform.
REFERENCES
1. D. Zhao, “Multi-element resonators and scaled fractional Fourier transforms,” Opt. Comunn. 168, 85-88 (1999).
2. J. Hua, L. Liu and G. Li, ”Scaled fractional Fourier transform and its optical implementation” Appl. Opt. 36,
8490-8492 (1997).
3. C.O. Torres, Y. Torres and P. Pellat—Finet, Electronic Edition. Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas,
Físicas y Naturales, paper 090,Santafé de Bogotá, October, (1998).
4. P. Pellat-Finet, “Fresnel diffraction and the fractional-order Fourier transform”, Opt. Let., 19, pp 1388- 1390,
1994.
5. W. Goodman, “Introduction to Fourier optics,” McGraw-Hill, New York, Chap. 3, p. 34, (1996).
6. X. Wang and J. Zhou, “Scaled fractional Fourier transform and optical system,” Opt. Comunn. 147, 341-348
(1998).
7. W A. W. Lohmann, Z. Zalevsky, R. G. Dorsh and D. Mendlovic, “Experimental considerations and scaling
property of the fractional Fourier transform,” Opt. Comunn. 146, 55-61 (1998).
8. A. W. Lohmann, “A fake lens for fractional Fourier experiments,” Opt. Com. 115, 437-443 (1995).
9. J. D. Gaskill, “Linear system, Fourier transforms; and optics,” John wiley sons, New York, Chap. 10, p. 420,
(1980).
10. Fan Ge, Shaomin Wang, Daomu Zhao ”The representation of waist-to-waist transformation of Gaussian beams
by the scaled fractional Fourier transform”. , Optics and laser technology. Article in press.
167