This document provides feedback on a case study assignment submitted by Gayathri Muniandy. The summary identifies several areas for improvement, including more detailed descriptions of the annotated articles, demonstrating a deeper understanding of the articles' conclusions, properly justifying the selection of sources, addressing grammatical and spelling errors, and properly citing sources and references according to APA style. Overall, the feedback indicates the assignment would benefit from stronger support and evidence from scholarly sources.

1. AB Case Study Assignment Help
by Gayathri Muniandy
Submission date: 24-Jul-2017 01:12PM (UTC+1000)
Submission ID: 832700865
File name: 31215_59881709_1064177977_AB_case_study.docx (28.34K)
Word count: 1884 Character count: 10966

4. Incorrect Spelling
Methodology
Limitations (weaknesses)

6. Methodology
Limitations (weaknesses)

8. Methodology
Limitations (weaknesses)

10. 6
7
8
9

12. Support
Structure of essay
Support
Vague

15. Improper Citation

17. Support
Support Needed:<br>A well-written paper will include strong support f or its thesis. Support f
or your thesis should come f rom primary (original documents, interviews, and personal
experiences) and secondary (inf ormation that has been processed or interpreted by someone
else) sources. To use your support ef f ectively, you must elaborate upon the inf ormation,
quotations, and examples taken f rom your sources and connect them to your thesis. It is also
important to remember to cite the sources of the evidence and support you use in your paper.
Structure of essay
Incomplete. Ref er to the instructions and Health Writing and Ref erencing guide
QM Support
Support Needed:<br>A well-written paper will include strong support f or its thesis. Support f
or your thesis should come f rom primary (original documents, interviews, and personal
experiences) and secondary (inf ormation that has been processed or interpreted by someone
else) sources. To use your support ef f ectively, you must elaborate upon the inf ormation,
quotations, and examples taken f rom your sources and connect them to your thesis. It is also
important to remember to cite the sources of the evidence and support you use in your paper.
QM Vague
Unclear:<br>When making a point in one of your body paragraphs, one of the most common
mistakes is to not of f er enough details. A paragraph without much detail will seem vague and
sketchy. A paper is always strengthened when your claims are as specif ic as possible, The more
detailed evidence you of f er, the more ref erence points your reader will have. Remember that
you are communicating your argument to a reader who has only your description to go by.
Someone who reads your essay will not automatically know what you mean to express, so you
have to supply details, to show the reader what you mean, not just tell him or her.
QM Improper Citation
Improper citation:<br>Improperly cited material. Please use the link below to f ind links to inf
ormation regarding specif ic citation styles:
http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
GRADING FORM: 1203NRS UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH
GAYATHRI MUNIANDY45

18. COMPONENTS OF THE ESSAY
Annotated Bibliography: 3 articles have been chosen from the list provided. (1) Justification
for your choice of sources: The chosen articles have been justified as relevant for the case study
using 9 different sources from scholarly literature. (2) Recommendations for clinical practice
supported from the same sources of scholarly literature.
COMPREHENSION AND EVALUATION
A high level response will provide: • Accurate discussion of the importance of the articles to
the topic provided. (10) • All the annotations include accurate detailed descriptions of each
article in a clear & consistent, succinct manner. (10) • Provide evidence of a deep understanding
of each article’s conclusions from the research as described. (10) • Evaluation links all aspects
including methodology, findings, conclusions, limitations of the topic. (10) • Use of scholarly
literature appropriately to support the discussion.
Description of each article insufficiently summarised.
20
Lack of understanding with articles ready
demonstrated.
SELECTION OF LITERATURE
A high level response will provide: Evidence of accurate comprehension of each article (6)
Evidence of an exploration of the literature to justify the annotation. selections reflecting
understanding of the clinical issue & its connection to your clinical practice. (6) The evidence
based sources provided have been read, understood and annotated. (6) The justification of the
selections and the recommendations demonstrate all relationship points between the topic and
clinical practice. (6) Use of scholarly literature appropriately to support the discussion. (6)
Strengths and justifications of selected article not
13
discussed. Lack of scholarly evidence to justify
annotation sections reflecting understanding of the clinical issue discussed.
PRESENTATION AND STRUCTURE
A high level response will provide: The writing is clear and concise.
(2) The annotations are clear & succinctly convey the key information about the source. (2)
Conforms to the Health Writing and Referencing Guidelines.(2) Word limits for assessment
items are strictly adhered to. (2) Essay is well presented, with correct spelling, grammar, with
well-constructed sentence and paragraph structure. (2)

19. Writing is unclear and discussion is vague . Multiple
4
grammatical and spelling errors found . At times, the
writing is awkward and illogical making ti difficult to understand the student argument
REFERENCING
Referencing as per APA Style 6th Edition.(4) Essay is supported with no fewer than 9 different
sources from the scholarly literature & free of APA errors (4) Separate page for reference list. (2)
Some referencing and intext citation errors. Please
5
refer to APA6th ed for referencing.
AB case study
ORIGINALITY REPORT
25% 19% 7% 22%
SIMILARITY INDEX INTERNET SOURCESPUBLICATIONS STUDENT PAPERS
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Griffth University
14%
1
Student Paper
Submitted to Southern Illinois University
2%2
Edwardsville
Student Paper
Submitted to University of Sydney
2%
3
Student Paper
Submitted to Chamberlain College of Nursing
2%
4
Student Paper
Submitted to Australian Catholic University
2%
5
Student Paper
onlinelibrary.wiley.com 1%

20. 6
Internet Source
jdc.jefferson.edu
<1%
7
Internet Source
pure.york.ac.uk
<1%8
Internet Source
9medicine.exeter.ac.uk
Internet Source
<1%
monash.edu
<1%
10
Internet Source
Exclude quotes Of fExclude matches Of f
Exclude bibliography Of f