How Did Truman Use The Atomic Bomb Dbq

How Did Truman Use The Atomic Bomb Dbq
The Pacific War was a series of bloody battles, unlike any other in American history, that was fought in
many obscure areas between Japan and The United States of America. It dated from 1941 to 1945. The
theatre of war in the Pacific was significantly different compared to any battle in Europe during World
War II. If given the choice, any soldier would prefer to battle in Europe, a less treacherous and foreign
land, compared to the islands and unfamiliarity in the Pacific. Japanese territory consisted of jungles,
caves, and volcanic mountains that were exceedingly difficult to fight on. Correspondingly, the sun was
blazing hot and soldiers lived with severely small rations, making it hard for them to adjust to such
brutal conditions. Because ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One may argue the atomic bomb dropped on Japan ended the war, saved lives, and saved a small
amount of money by not going to waste. The two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Iwo Jima
overall ended the war by forcing Japan to surrender. "For Americans in uniform and those who waited
for them to come home, outrageous as this might appear from the moral heights of hindsight, it was a
sunburst of deliverance." (Doc 13) Lester Bernstein gave examples of the alleviation felt once the war
ended. Although many were relieved, the act of dropping the bomb was completely barbaric. It was
immoral for the United States to drop a bomb when there was opportunities to defeat the Japanese in
various ways. The United States could stage a demonstration of the nuclear weapons they could
possibly use or even use less violent weapons like smaller bombs. Similarly, another argument was that
the atomic bombs saved American lives. "That was the attitude of the United States in those years... I
have been convinced that we saved more lives than we took." (Doc 3) Colonel Tibbets recollected his
experiences when dropping the bomb and seemed to be persuaded that dropping an atomic bomb
would only have positive effects. Many Americans were somewhat brainwashed into thinking the
bombs were the only answers and saved more of our population. Unfortunately, American leaders
forgot to mention all the innocent lives being lost in
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Essay On The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb Unjustified
In my opinion the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan was not justified because it caused many
problems and issues that even today, affects all of us. The dropping of the atomic bomb was decided by
Harry Truman the president of the US at the time. Truman thought by dropping the bomb it would
make Japan to unconditionally surrender. The US did not how destructive the bomb really was until
they dropped it on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The US had chosen Hiroshima not only since it was a
military target, but also because of how heavily urbanized it is. After three days another big atomic
bomb was dropped in Nagasaki. It's unjustified because of the long term and bad effects it had on
Japan, it started the cold war, and it started technology that changes warfare forever. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The bomb that was dropped in Hiroshima killing 80,000 to 140,000 people instantly and seriously
injuring 100,000 more. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki destroyed a lot of Infrastructure and
had a lot of psychological and physical damage was caused to the people in Japan. Furthermore, a lot
of people had radiation that affected them which would often be passed down to future leading to
further health problems.
Not only did the atomic bomb have effects instead of actually ending the world war two it had started
the cold war. The conference in Yalta that had happened in February 1945 had stated that "Russia
would help Japan when Germany was defeated" but it changed in the Potsdam conference where the
new president of the US Harry Truman had different plans. Instead of going with what had been said in
Yalta, Truman had dropped the atomic bomb on Japan. When Stalin realized that he was tricked he was
furious, so he too started making an atomic

Why Shouldnt Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Essay
They shouldnt have dropped the bomb. In August 1945 President Truman decided to drop two atomic
bombs on Japan. Dropping the bomb on Japan was not a good idea. (because) They shouldnt have
dropped the bomb on Japan. Their are people that have inocent lives & some of them died like kids.
Kids shouldnt have died because they didnt have any thing to do with it & they got their lives taken.
First of all I dont think they should have dropped the atomic bomb because, thier were alot of inocent
lives . There were 80,000 people that died in the atomic bomb dropped. Some people think it was
wrong for them to drop the bomb but I mean we cant do anything about it. Over the next four to six
months the effects of the atomic bombing killed 90,000 to 146,000 people in Hiroshima and 39,000 in
Nagasaki. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
35,000 got injured in the bomb drop. Shortly afterwards on August 15 , 1945 japan finally admitted
defeat. President Harry S. Truman wanted Enola Gay to drop the atomic bomb. President Harry S.
Truman warned by some of his advisors that any attempt to invade would result horrific american
casualites. Enola Gay dropped a five–ton bomb over the japanese city of Hiroshima. Their was about
like 500–800 babies were examined in their houses. (aasc.ucla.edu/cab/index.html) We think the
atomic bomb was a horrible disision to drop on so many people lives that some of them was inocent.
The main reason why they dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima is because, it involved 7 planes but
the only one that they remember is the Enola Gay becuase that is the mans name that dropped it . If that
wouldnt have happen the world would be a different place today. Tibbits the mother of the plane , who
selected the aircraft while it was on the assembly line. On August 6, 1945 during the final stage it was
about to happen. Their was inocent lives taken about 105,000 is dead in both. Aprocxmently 94,000
was injured in both of the bombing.

The Pros And Cons Of Albert Einstein And Enrico Fermi
In 1939, during World War 2, German physicists learned how to split an Uranium atom. Albert Einstein
and Enrico Fermi knew the dangers of this, and knew they had to tell President Franklin Roosevelt, and
warn him of this. Few of the government officials told people of their uneasiness. Because the
president still was not aware of this, Albert Einstein decided to write to him. Einstein's letter urged the
development of an atomic research program. Roosevelt didn't see the necessity for such a project, but
decided that he would follow through with the plan, slowly. The project started in late 1941 and was
called the Manhattan Project (The Manhattan Project, pars 1–3). Once the United States got involved
in the war, the War Department was mostly

A Petition To The President Analysis
A Critical Review of A Petition to the United States In A Petition to the President, Szilard and his
cosigners, used their knowledge about atomic bombs to try and persuade the President of the United
States, to not to allow the authorization of atomic bombs during the war. They write about the
destruction caused by using an atomic bomb and the potential fall out from using such a weapon.
Before the devastating bomb dropped on Japan by America, there were scientists who tired to bring
awareness of such an event. In this essay the scientists, Szilard and his 59 consigners, drafted a petition
to the President of the United States, in hopes that he would not allow the use of atomic bombs during
the war. The scientists who worked in the field of atomic power for many years, want the President to
know that using atomic bombs could increase ruthlessness, which the country has already started on a
journey to do so. They go on to state that the Air ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Szilard did rewrite and it on July 17, 1945. Had this made it to his desk on time, maybe the President
would have considered their views on the bombs. No one will really know if that is the case. This
petition was successful in that it brought the attention it needed to atomic bombs. It may not have
gotten to the desk of the President in a timely manner for it to be used in a yes or no on the bombs, but
it was still a piece of information that made you aware of them. Before the devastating bomb dropped
on Japan by America, there were scientists who tired to bring awareness of such an event. Szilard and
his co signers had hoped to write a petition that would sway the President to not allow the use of
atomic bombs. We know from history that the use of atomic bombs did happen during the war. Just one
month later the use of an atomic bomb was dropped on Japan. If this petition made it to the desk of the
President on time, maybe a different outlook would have

Why Did President Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb
In August 1945 President Truman decided to drop two atomic bombs on japan. Just the bomb in
Hiroshima killed 146,000 people. Killed all 226,000 people in all. Dropping the bomb was a huge deal.
President Truman did not have to drop the bomb to end' the war. An atomic bomb is a very powerful
bomb. This bomb destroyed a whole city and killed lots of people.
The bombings killed more than 200,000 Japanese civilians [https://qz.com/472146/its–clear–the–us–
should–not–have– bombed–hiroshima–and–nagasaki/ ]. There were still many more after the bomb
was dropped. Many adults pass the radiation poisoning down to their kids. Most of these kids got
leukemia and died.
President Truman did not have to drop the bomb to end the war
[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/08/08/we_didnt_have_to_drop_the_bomb_127709.html

The Enola Gay
One of the biggest controversies of the 20th century was caused by one little plane, the Enola Gay. The
Enola Gay was a B–29 Superfortress bomber that dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. August 6,
1945 was a historic day. Lives were lost and it was the start of the very end of World War ll. The use of
this very destructive weapon could be seen as inhumane, but it was a decision that had to be made.
Americans and people from other countries today have their own opinion of our war ending tactic.
What is important to think about is that sometimes tough decisions have to be made for the greater
good of everyone. The use of the Enola Gay was justified in that it was used for the greater good of
saving thousands of lives, but also helping to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"The committee concluded that the bomb should be used to end the war as soon as possible; that it
should be dropped on a military–urban target so as to demonstrate its full force; and that a
demonstration or warning should not be made beforehand, lest the bomb lose its shock value."
(McDougall np) The United States had two options really and they were either invade Japanese
mainland or use the atomic bomb. "The Japanese navy had ceased to exist and Japan 's military losses
were staggering, but instead of surrendering the Japanese army decided to fight on. U.S. military
leaders then calculated what losses could be expected if U.S. troops invaded the Japanese mainland.
Based on earlier battles, they expected the casualties to be horrendous." (Hiroshima 77) In war, lives
being lost is unavoidable, however President Truman knew that if the bomb was not dropped the
amount of casualties would be too many from the invasion. The crew members of the Enola Gay have
a story that only they can tell. They were the people the dropped the first atomic bomb. Since the
dropping of the bomb is such a controversial topic, many people probably wonder how the people that
went through with this war–ending tactic feel about it. The crew felt that the use of the bomb was
definitely justified, but a few were disappointed that it had to come to that point even though

Compare And Contrast Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki
I do not think the United States was justified when dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and
Nagasaki because it should of been considered a war crime, the attack was unnecessary and Japan was
already on the verge of surrendering. A war crime is torturing/giving inhumane treatment to humans or
causing serious injury to one's body and or health When the United states dropped the atomic bomb on
Hiroshima on August 6th, 1945, 90,000–146,000–civilians lives were lost. Three days later, on August
9th, the United states dropped a second bomb on Nagasaki instantly killing 40,000 people overall
killing 50,000. Since it was virtually impossible to count every single person who perished in these
bombings it is estimated that 225,000 people passed

Why America Dropped The Atomic Bomb
America built the atomic bomb for defense not offense. Einstein, a renowned scientist from the country
of Germany, told America that Germany was close to creating a nuclear bomb. This caused America to
go into full action. Then on August 6, 1945 the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima by the
Americans. Although the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in many Japanese casualties,
ultimately the bombings had reasons behind them, saved many more lives, and ended the war quickly.
Everyone knows the atomic bomb, but not everyone knows the story behind it. "Since 1940, the United
States had been working on developing an atomic weapon, after having been warned by Albert Einstein
that Nazi Germany was already conducting research into nuclear weapons." (History.com–Atomic
Bomb dropped on Hiroshima). This thus started an intense race to see who would create the nuclear
bomb faster, either the Americans or ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One reason is that it was used as a field experiment on Japan. The second reason would be that when
dropping this bomb, it would ensure and demonstrate how powerful America was. This would give
America a lot of presence.Another reason is because the two cities hiroshima and Nagasaki were vital
points for the war effort towards the Japanese firepower (History.com–Bombing of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki). America also decided to target these two cities is because when compared to the other
cities, these two were less densely populated (Doug). This would result in fewer civilian casualties.
Even so, if America still attacked these two choke point cities; Japan would still be at a great loss, see
what America could really do, and lose a lot of help for the war cause. America wanted to be strategic
about their choices because they were trying to take as few lives as possible but at the same time do as
much damage as

Pros And Cons Of Hiroshima Bombing
Although the bomb killed thousands of people, we should have dropped the atomic bomb on
Hiroshima because, we needed to end the war in a quick and promising way, since we didn't have any
better options.
In the book Hiroshima, an atomic bomb was dropped on the city in efforts to end World War 1. It was
not uncommon to get bombed in times of war, especially if it was a major city. Nearly all of the
Hiroshima expected to be bombed but their warning signals had alarmed so much that people began
going on with life as if the warnings were not going off. Mrs. Nakamura was one of many in Hiroshima
to realize the bombing would happen sooner or later. She even told Hersey that, "It was war and we
had to expect it" (Hersey 89). Exceedingly high percentages ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Any other alternative proposed, created threats to the American country. A New York Times Upfront
article declared that, "[the options] each posed serious military, political, and diplomatic risks... [the
atomic bomb] appeared to be the most promising way to end the war as soon as possible and without
the drawbacks of the alternatives" ("Necessary"). The US government could have waited and tried
something different but in that case, we would risk ourselves, and there was no definite way to know it
would work or if we needed something else. These other choices may have slightly shifted the war if
used but the chances of creating more issues would arise. In a time of war, all anyone wants is to have
it over with. During the battle, men fighting rarely think much about who they are killing but more so
the reason they are fighting: "there was no difference between civilians and soldiers, and that the bomb
itself was an effective force tending to end the bloodshed, and warning Japan to surrender and thus to
avoid total destruction (Hersey 89–90). Whatever it took to stop the war, we would do. The sooner the
better as that means less death and destruction. All we were trying to do was stop the conflict without
resulting in more friction among nations. On both sides of the war, people lay dead. The longer war
went on, the more issues that came up. Ending the war did not mean stopping it for now, or making
something worse just to get a better advantage. It meant completely putting it to a stop and saving
people's lives and the future of humanity in the long run. The New York Times write, "necessary to
bring Japan to its knees without an invasion that would have had far greater casualties, both American
and Japanese" ("Fireball"). America still wanted to win the war when it was finished, but also wanted
the best for Japan. If anything else other than the

Effects Of The Atomic Bomb Essay
Invention: The Atomic Bomb
The atomic bomb is one of the most important events in history. The atomic bomb changed the world
because of its destruction. I do not believe in the atomic bomb because it killed thousands of innocent
people. Sure, we were in the war with the Japanese but most of those people were just humans who
lived there; most were not involved in the war. The bomb killed kids and many people The atomic
bomb might have ended World War II, but it started the cold war. After the bomb, there was an atomic
race and everyone felt they needed an atomic bomb because the U.S. had one and that was a threat to
many people. I do not think that we should have killed those people. That is mainly because now there
are problems with the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
And kilotons are one thousand tons of dynamite going off. One megaton is equal to one thousand
kilotons.
The United States dropped the atomic bomb because we wanted to end brutal World War II against the
Japanese. The reason the bomb was dropped on Japan and not Germany is that the Japanese were very
strong; they would not surrender; they would keep fighting. They only gave up after the atomic bombs
that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The bombs were dropped on august 6th and 9th in 1945
on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This will remain one of the most important events in history. We might
always remember this bomb ending the war, but we should also remember the innocent people who
were killed (most were not even involved in the war) and the brave people who fought for their country
and died because we killed them. One of the only good things about the about the atomic bomb is that
it allowed us to learn more about the atom. There are many bad things about the atomic bomb: first of
all, it killed about 150,000 people in Hiroshima and 80,000 in Nagasaki. Half of these people died the
next day and about 67% of Hiroshima was destroyed. Nagasaki was also almost destroyed: 62%
percent was ruined. Even though people are still living in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, traces of the bomb
will be there for many years. A few weeks after the bomb was dropped, hospitals were full with sick
people because

Compare And Contrast Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki
Imagine a leader of a country that has sent a super weapon to a country they are fighting that's already
losing. This bomb kills over 80,000 people and ends the war with this country, and the leader still said
that they made the right choice up until their death, about sending the super weapon. Well this actually
happened, President Truman ordered the atomic bomb to be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to
end the war. The war has gone on for six years and over sixty–million people had died. Europe had
already surrendered, but the war in Japan was still going on. The U.S. has developed a super weapon to
end the war, and stop the endless bloodshed. This super weapon was the first atomic bomb. President
Truman decided to drop the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing Japan to surrender, but killing
over 80,000 people in Hiroshima alone. The controversy over whether the U.S. should've dropped the
bomb or not has been an endless debate (Debate: Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki). The U.S. should
have dropped the bomb on Japan because the U.S. didn't know the power of the bomb, a demonstration
of the weapon wouldn't have ended the war, and because it helped Japan in the long run (Debate:
Bombing Hiroshima ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
should have dropped the bomb on Japan because the U.S. didn't know the power of the bomb, a
demonstration of the weapon wouldn't have ended the war, and because it helped Japan in the long run
(Debate: Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Were we right or wrong? 27 28, 29). Dropping the atomic
bomb was the decision made by President Truman, and this is a wise quote that he said about his
decision: "The atom bomb was no "great decision." It was used in the war, and for your information,
there were more people killed by fire bombs in Tokyo than dropping of the atomic bombs accounted
for. It was merely another powerful weapon in the arsenal of righteousness. The dropping of the bombs
stopped the war, save millions of lives. (Harry S. Truman Quotes About Atomic

The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay
Introduction
August 6th 1945, the end of the world war had begun with the dropping of the atomic bombs on the
Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. An American B–29 bomber dropped as described by many as
the weapon that could destroy the world. One of which dropped on the 6th of August on the city of
Hiroshima was dropped by a Uranium bomb nicknamed the "little boy" and the other bomb dropped
August 8th on the city Nagasaki was made of Plutonium nicknamed "fat man". During the Hiroshima
bombing, it was estimated that between 90,000–166,000 killed in Hiroshima and 39,000–80,000 killed
in Nagasaki. The dropping of the atomic bombs showed that America showed complete dominance in
the war in the Pacific but it is stated that these bombs weren't required as they were seen as
unnecessary or inhumane. Historian Peter Kuznick a well known historian and Director of the Nuclear
Studies Institute at American University give his perspective on why the US dropped the atomic bombs
and he believes it was to exclude the Russians from entering the war in the Pacific. Henry L. Stimson,
former war US war general/advisor was highly decorated and his perspective states that the use of the
atomic bomb was unfair and wasn't necessary.
Perspective 1: Stimson
Explanation of perspective
Henry L. Stimson, was former American Secretary of War during 1940–1945, the years in which
America was in battle with Japan throughout the Pacific. Henry Stimson was seen responsible for the
training of 13

World War 2 Persuasive Letter
Task 1 – You are an adviser to President Truman and he has asked for your advice. You now write a
letter to him, dated July 1945, trying to convince him to decide on a course of action regarding what to
do with the bombs. You take a position on how to use the bombs to end the war with Japan. President
Truman, I am writing to you today to give you my advice regarding what to do with the atomic bombs
to end World War II. I strongly advise that the bombs should be dropped on Japan for multiple reasons.
This is obviously going to be a difficult decision to make with positives and negative behind it but
hopefully my advice will help you in your decision. I think that the bombs should be dropped and I
think the best place to drop it would have ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I will warn Japan a week from the day I will potentially drop the bomb. In doing this it will give them
the opportunity to surrender before the bomb is dropped. I will write up leaflets with the date that it
will be dropped and that they have time to surrender beforehand. I will also write on them that if they
don't surrender, the innocent people that die will be on them and not me and I will not be to blame. I
hope they make the right decision for Japan and everyone involved in the war and surrender. It will
save the Japanese and also me the heartache for the innocent people that die at the place of the
bombing. I was given the advice that we could demonstrate the danger of the bomb on an uninhabited
place with one of the two bombs that we have ready. This was a very good idea recommended to me
from one of my presidential advisors but I have decided that I am not going to go ahead with it due to
me giving them warning in a different way. I think if we were to drop one of the bombs on an
uninhabited place it would be a waste and that the bomb would be better saved for a later date if the
first bomb was not a success in ending the

Persuasive Essay On Dropping The Atomic Bomb
During World War II, President Harry S. Truman ordered for an atomic bomb to be dropped on the
Japanese city of Hiroshima on August 6th ,1945. The second and last atomic bomb to ever be dropped
was in the city of Nagasaki on August 9th, 1945. Many Americans believed dropping the atomic bomb
was necessary to end the war in a more timely manner, however, many others believed dropping the
atomic bomb was too extreme of a measure to take against Japan. With the creation of the atomic
bomb, the United States had a weapon of mass destruction that no one else yet had. Therefore, with the
power the atomic bomb possessed, some people believed its use should only be used as a last resort. If
Japan would not surrender during this war, then the United States would have a valid and necessary
reason in using the power of an atomic bomb. For the other Americans that believed in the immediate
drop of the atomic bomb, dropping it would end the war sooner, which would then decrease the amount
American soldiers who would be killed during the war. Whether dropping the atomic bomb on Japan
was the most ethical decision that President Truman could have ordered is still debated. World War II
was a devastating war that impacted the entire world. It is estimated that nearly 60 million people were
killed, including civilians. The fight was between the Allies and Axis powers. While the United States
tried to remain neutral in the war and not get involved. However, due to Japan's military launching

The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
In August 1945 president Harry Truman dropped the first atomic bomb on Japan. There are many sides
in which people have taken that either support or go against this decision. If I were Harry Truman and I
was given the decision on whether the atomic bomb should be dropped I would NOT have dropped the
bomb on Japan. This decision I have made comes from a Christian view point. While reading the letter
sent from Samuel McCrea Cravert to Harry S. Truman I developed the opinion that America was
attempting to fight fire with fire. President Truman stated, "The only language they seem to understand
is the one we have been using to bombard them." This meant that the Japanese wouldn't surrender and
only understood violence. He says this in response to McCrea's ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They believed we should give Japan another chance to reconsider the ultimatum before the atomic
bomb was used on their nation. If I was Harry Truman I would have agreed with this protest and given
them another chance to surrender before dropping the atomic bomb. These Christians were disturbed
over the use of the atomic bomb and so were many other citizens. I personally do not believe the use of
this bomb would end all wars and that it would cause a worse war in the future. The courage to drop
this bomb on another nation would only be seen and replicated far worse. Who are we to say this
weapon would end wars when it could potentially cause a nuclear war later in time. The Atomic bomb
is defined by dictionary.com as "a bomb whose potency is derived from nuclear fission of atoms of
fissionable material with the consequent conversion of part of their mass into energy." This simply by
definition is too complex of a bomb to be

Should The Us Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay
On August 6, 1945, the United states have dropped the atomic bomb on Japan city of Hiroshima and
three days after The United States have dropped the second bomb on Japan city of Nagasaki to end
World War II. The United States should not have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan to end World
War II because it was inhumane, unnecessary, and brutal.
The United States should not have dropped the atomic bomb because it was inhumane. By using that
powerful bomb on japan lots of people died and lots of people lost their children, families, and it also
ruined everything on their land so they can't have access to anything. According to document 'E,' the
evidence shows that it was hard for Japanese because they lost lots of people, 64,000 people total died
from Nagasaki and 135,000 total died from Hiroshima which was terrifying. This evidence helps
explain that the U.S. should not have dropped the atomic bomb because it took lives of civilians and
innocent people.
The United States should not have dropped the atomic bomb because it was unnecessary. United State
still had many other resources to use on Japan to end the war. They should not have used this powerful
atomic bomb because Japan was already defeated. When the United States wanted to stop World War
II, they could have used not too powerful bombs at a location which would not ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The atomic bomb killed many innocent people that didn't have anything to do with war such as school
kids and little children. " One of my classmates, he muttered something and pointed outside the
window" All I can remember was a pale lightning flash for two or three seconds then, I collapsed, it
was awful"(document D). This evidence helps explain that the U.S. should not have dropped the
atomic bomb because it is about the innocent school children that were hit by the bomb and it shows
how they did not have anything to do with the

Why We Should Not Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive...
There are many reasons why we should not have dropped the atomic bomb. So I will tell you some
reasons why we should not have dropped the atomic bomb. First is the radiation that stays there for
250,000 years. The dropping has made it to where no plants will grow from where the bomb hit and
left radiation. Most of all of their water in Hiroshima is radiated and if you drink the water you will get
sick. (Radiation exposure). The radiation has also killed most of the entire wild in Hiroshima which
means they don't have a lot of food. The radiation has also killed many men, woman, and children.
Then all of their houses would start to deuterated. Then the atomic bomb put our nation under a nuclear
threat, because when we dropped the bomb the country's

Essay On The Atomic Bomb
On August 6, 1945, the US dropped a atomic Bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, instantly killing
140,000. Three days later, the US dropped another on the Japanese city, Nagasaki, killing 74000. The
US dropped these bombs instead of invading the Mainland Japan. The United States should not have
dropped these atomic bombs on the Japanese.
The dropping of these bombs was unnecessary. The Japanese government was on the verge of collapse.
They were completely defeated, and the Japanese were ready to surrender. Admiral Leahy said, ""The
use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war
against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender..."(Document 2). This
weapon had no benefit towards us in winning the war against Japan. Not only that, but the US had
already bombed 60 of the cities in Japan, leaving many cities ruined. Death counts from bombing raids
total 300,000 lives from the US bombing. From this number, you can clearly see how the atomic bomb
wasn't necessary and we had already killed so many lives. Dropping these bombs did nothing to end
the war, as it already was ending. The atomic bombs only devastated Japan further and killed more
civilian lives.
The atomic bomb did horrible, horrible things to the people, who were exposed to it. It did horrible
things when it exploded and killed hundreds of thousand instantly. The explosion was so powerful,
some people were even vaporized immediately when it

A Closer Look at the Bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki
With multiple chances from the United States to surrender in the war and rejecting each one, the
Japanese set themselves up for disaster. On August 6, 1945 the course of history was changed. Two
atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima, and three days later, August 9, 1945,
on Nagasaki that ended World War II. Japan had already been a defeated nation from conventional
bombs and World War II. Many innocent lives were lost, psychological scars were left on the lives of
the bomb survivors, and thus many lives were changed forever. The atomic bombings caused many
people to have genetic effects due to the radiation from the bombs. Revisionists have said the US used
the bombs to blackmail the Soviet Union. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The atomic bombs ultimately saved both American and Japanese lives (Henry 51). If the bomb had not
been dropped, more lives would have been lost and other nations could have gotten involved. The
soldiers would have kept fighting for who knows how long, causing the war to continue on longer, with
many more lives lost, both American and Japanese. If other nations got involved in the Pacific War
effort, then people from those nations too would have more dead. The bombs saved the US from an
invasion of Japan, therefore saving thousands of American lives. The bombs ended the war and there
has not been a third world war. If the bombs had not been dropped the war would have taken longer to
end and the threat of a third world war would have been on the rise. The atomic bombs on Hiroshima
and Nagasaki ended the war quickly. President Truman stated in a speech in 1945, "The use of the
atomic bomb was a military decision to end the war and save millions of lives. It was just the same as
getting a bigger gun than the other fellow had to win the war and that's what it was used for"(Loebs 7).
The bombs were dropped as a military move to end the war (Henry 51). Then Secretary of War Henry
Stimson stated that the dropping of the bombs and the destruction was the least horrible choice and that
the dropping of the bombs ended the war (Loebs 6). The atomic bombs had not been dropped yet and
Japan was already a beaten nation

Why Was The Atomic Bomb Justified
When the atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki all living things in a five square
mile radius of where the atomic bombs impacted died instantly, it ended the war and saved thousands
lives. The following documents tell you about the importance of dropping the atomic bomb and the
thinking behind there strategies. The US wanted Japan to surrender and wanted no more bloodshed and
wanted the Soviet Union to be surprised. As stated in document 13 the Americans concern for Japan's
unwillingness to resign, "imminent threat of a landing, on Japan proper by us, to convince them of the
hopelessness of their situation"1. and again in document 16 shares thoughts for Russia involvement,
"atomic attack against Japan would shock the Russians"2 finally document 17 shows the stubbornness
of "Japan to agree Japanese leadership would probably not have surrendered if the Truman
administration had clarified the status of the emperor when it demanded unconditional surrender
prolongation of the war and cost a large number of human lives"3. Although some people think
dropping the atomic bombs on Japan wasn't justified, I think that dropping the atomic bombs on Japan
was justified. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Here are some details about the atomic bombs, Fat Man was an implosion–type bomb and Little Boy
was a normal type of atomic bomb. Many lives were lost when the atomic bombs exploded do you
think it could have been avoided? By dropping the atomic bombs on Japan the war ended and many
lives were saved and that is why I think dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was justified. When the
atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki all living things in a five square mile radius
of where the atomic bombs impacted died instantly, it ended the war and saved thousands lives and that
is why dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was

Drop The Bomb? Essay
U.S. History – Grech
Atomic Bombs Dropped on Japan, Justified?
On August 6th and 9th of 1945 U.S. bombers dropped atomic bombs on the
Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing utter destruction and many deaths.
These bombs were dropped as the Pacific battles of World War II were coming to an end.
Soon after Japan surrendered, ending the war. But, was the use of atomic warfare
necessary? Was it too harsh and cruel to the Japanese? The first question was whether or
not to drop a bomb. The effects of atomic warfare had not been known and studied, but it
was apparent that it would be a good tool in ending the war. The first bomb did appear
necessary to ending the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
had. That never happened. George Marshall then suggested that
we warned the Japanese ahead of time to clear the military base at Hiroshima of people,
but the army didn't want the Japanese to expect the attack. Less than a month after the
first test, a bomb fell on Hiroshima.
Dropping an atomic bomb worked as expected. The two main goals of using
atomic warfare were simple, to put a quick end to the war, saving up to a million U.S.
lives, and finish off Japan before the Russians try to take over parts of the Pacific. It
pretty much worked, the war ended soon after and even though the Russian declared war
on the Japan, like expected, they were not able to gain to much power in the Pacific.

Dropping of the first bomb on Hiroshima was the right choice of the American military.
Even though it was justified to used atomic power to put an end to the war, the
second bomb on Nagasaki was unnecessary. It came only three days after the first bomb
hit Hiroshima. Most historians say this was not enough time for the Japanese to consider
and sign a surrender. Another city was destroyed for no reason. Old documents state that
Japan was ready to surrender. Besides the time factor the bombing of Nagasaki was
obviously wrong because it seemed like

Atomic Bomb History
The first atomic bomb ever to be used in a military operation was
dropped on the City of Hiroshima. The second bomb exploded over Nagasaki. The
first bomb dropped on Hiroshima was made from uranium. The bomb dropped on
Nagasaki was made from plutonium. Little Boy was based on enriched uranium–
235 and Fat Man on plutonium–239. During world war ll, Hiroshima was a city of
considerable military importance. Hiroshima was the primary target of the first
U.S. nuclear attack mission. The city of Nagasaki however, was not the primary
target for the second atomic. Nagasaki was put on the target list in place of Kyoto.
The Aug. 6 bomb was name "little Boy" and the Aug. 9 bomb was name "fat
Man". More than 60,000 buildings were decimated.
The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By this fact alone, Americans to this day feel justified in their support for
the action of Truman and his war machine. However, Truman did not have any
serious discussions with the military about possible losses in a ground invasion, all
such calculations have been done since the events of August 1945." The bomb
was released to detonate at 1,900 ft. above ground for maximum effect, creating
a fireball that reached a diameter of 1,000 ft. and a temperature of more than
3,000 degrees Celsius, followed by a deafening boom and a blast wave". In a
matter of seconds, Hiroshima became silent to the rest of Japan. The Japanese

had no idea what had happened".
"They sent an aircraft to find out. The aircraft arrived and circled above the city.
The staff officer looked at the scarred land, the dark cloud above and the burning
city in disbelief. The aircraft landed and the rescue mission began. Many people
believe that this was the only way to get Emperor Hirohito of Japan to surrender
to the United States. Some believe that there were other reasons for dropping

Why Did The United States Build An Atomic Bomb?
During world war two, many countries were trying to build an atomic bomb. They wanted to build it
first so they could end the war and win. The United States was mainly racing against Germany and the
Soviet Union to build an atomic bomb. We did not know how far along Germany was in building an
atomic bomb because everyone was keeping their progress very secret. The Soviet Union had many
spies trying to figure out the science behind the atomic bomb because we were farther along than them.
Once we had built the bomb Germany had already surrendered, but Japan had not. We decided to drop
two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because we did not want to lose any more American
soldiers in the war. After I read this book, I think we made

Was The Atomic Bomb Necessary In World War II?
Was it necessary for Truman to drop the Atomic Bombs on Japan in World War II? On August 6, 1945,
the first atomic bomb was dropped by a US aircraft on Hiroshima. This atomic bomb was dropped to
force Japan into surrender, this bomb alone destroyed Hiroshima and over 90,000 people were instantly
killed in the explosion and an additional 100,000 people perished from burns and radiation sickness.
On August 9, 1945 only three days later, the second atomic bomb was dropped over Nagasaki resulting
in an additional 80,000 casualties of the Japanese population. The people of Japan surrendered on
August 14, 1945 soon after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Many people opposed to the use
of the atomic bombs because people argued that Truman 's decision to use atomic bombs was a
barbaric act of cruelty. People also argued that the US government had other ulterior motives to drop
the atomic bomb that were necessary for America 's ideals. Necessary motives like presenting The
Soviet Union a strong message for the Soviets to watch their step around America. A conventional way
of warfare for Japan 's surrender would have costed many more American lives. Truman and others
believed that the atomic bomb was necessary to save American lives but also Japanese lives. These
actions from President Truman marked the end of the most destructive war in history. The two sources
that will used and evaluated in this paper are is The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb by Dennis D.
Wainstock (1996)

Why Is The Atomic Bomb Wrong
The Atomic Bomb Two atomic bombs were dropped by the United States on Japan in order to stop
World War II. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. The second atomic bomb
was dropped on Nagasaki on August 9, 1945. These were the deadliest bombings in history. Twoo
scientists played an important part in the science behind the atomic bomb. The scientist that created the
theory of converting mass into energy, e = mc2 , was Albert Einstein. Energy is represented by e, mass
is m, and c is the speed of light. The destructive energy released when mass is turned into energy
makes the atomic bomb the most deadliest weapon ever used. Leo Szilard was also an important
scientist in developing the atomic bomb. He was instrumental in ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They are too powerful. However, at the end of World War II, we needed to use the atomic bomb. Many
Americans had already died at the hand of the Japanese. It looked as if Japan would not surrender
without an American invasion of Japan. This would have most likely caused the death of thousands of
more Americans as well as more Japanese. At that time, there was no fear of retaliation, we were the
only country in possession of the atomic bomb. However, that is no longer the case. Now more
countries possess atomic weapons. Also, the weapons are far more

Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb On Japan
In 1945 The US army dropped an atomic bomb on japan but some people think we shouldn't have
dropped the bomb on japan. I believe that we should have dropped that atomic bomb on japan. My
three reasons why are that it saved many of millions of lives, ended WW2 fast, and because japan
bombed pearl harbor. The atomic bomb saved millions of lives by if we would have just invaded japan
it would've been one of the most bloodiest wars. it would have been many, many times greater than the
200,000+ people that died from the atomic bombings. Japan would have lost so much more than what
it had actually suffered. The US decided whether to invade or not but they decided that the atomic
bomb was the route go to go without a lot of casualties. My second

The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And...
The U.S. should have dropped the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the bomb
brought the cruel war to an end quicker than it would have been without it. 50 to over 80 million lives
were taken during the war and the numbers would have continued growing if it hadn't been dropped. It
was up to President Harry S. Truman to decide whether or not they should drop the bomb. When
defending his decision to drop it he says, "But we knew that our enemies were on the search for it. We
now know how close they were to finding it. And we know the disaster which would come to this
nation...to all civilizations, if they had found it first...." President Truman believed that if the U.S. did
not use the bomb first then the Japanese would have. The U.S. used the Atomic ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war. It stopped the fire raids,
and the strangling blockade; it ended the ghastly specter of a clash of great land armies. In this last
great action of the Second World War we were given final proof that war is death." Death is inevitable
in war. The fights would have continued until either the U.S. or Japan surrendered which could have
taken months to happen. Many people died during the war. The U.S. not dropping the Atomic Bomb
would have led to having more battles in Japan, more deaths. In 1990, Paul Fussell, a World War II
Soldier, wrote an article, Thank God for the Atomic Bomb. In it he writes, "On Okinawa, only a few
weeks before Hiroshima, 123,000 Japanese and Americans killed each other. War is immoral. War is
cruel." Numerous Japanese live were lost in battles throughout the war. The Atomic Bomb killed
39,000–80,000 people in Nagasaki. This one battle alone killed 123,000 people. More battles like this
would have been fought and more people would have died then the amount of people who died due to
the

The Atomic Bombings Of Japan
One of the most argued topics in all of history is the atomic bombings of Japan in August of 1945.
Many argued that we should have done exactly as we did, they would argue it was the only way to get
Japan to surrender and to not lose any more American lives. Others believe that it was very unethical in
dropping the atomic bombs. The director of Nuclear Studies Institute at American University in
Washington D.C, Peter Kuznick, was against the whole idea, stating that "Truman knew he was
beginning the process of annihilation of the species. It was not just a war crime; it was a crime against
humanity."
Back in the fall of 1945, there was a poll, the Roper Poll, that the people of the United States took to
determined whether they think if we should have dropped the atomic bombs, Fat Man and Little Boy,
on the Japanese cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Back then 53.5 percent of the people who took this
poll agreed with it. Harold Steele was among this percentage. Steele was a U.S. Army Infantry
lieutenant in European theater during World War II, when he was interviewed by Mark DePue he stated
that, "I come even more proud of a president that had the courage, the conviction. But also, he'd been a
battery commander in the artillery in World War I. . .And that helped him make decisions without
probably thinking too long. Get this sucker over. . .We're fighting to the last blood, the last person!. .
.The kamikaze pilots and all the other factors brought into being that were not even

Pros And Cons Of Using The Atomic Bomb
Is Using the Atomic Bomb Ethical? In August of 1945, two nuclear bombs were dropped on Japan,
consequently, killing tens of thousands of civilians due to radiation, burns, or turning them
immediately into ash. The monstrous bomb sneaks up on innocent civilians and rips their life from
them in one foul swoop. The Atomic bomb kills masses of people at one time, but can also save masses
of people's lives from the ongoing war. Herein lies the conflict, since the nuclear bomb is extremely
lethal, but effective, should it be used in war? Do you believe that this act was ethical? The atomic
bomb should have never been used in past wars and should never be used today because its deadly side
effects. Even before the outbreak of War, the United States was concerned with a fascist regime in
Europe researching in nuclear weapons. In retaliation, the United States began to fund an atomic
weapon development program which became known as "The Manhattan Project" led by J. Robert
Oppenheimer. Over the next several years, the Manhattan project started obtaining key materials such
as Uranium–235 and Plutonium and testing prototypes until they reached a working model (Coroner).
With the new working bomb, during World War II American B–29 bomber dropped the world's first
atomic bomb called the little boy weighing 9,000 pounds on Hiroshima, Japan instantly killing eighty–
thousand people then killing over tens of thousands of people after due to radiation exposure. Three
days later another bomb

Atomic Bomb Persuasive Speech
Demarko Gates Mrs. Dean English 3 1 May 2015 The Atomic Bomb Threescore and fifteen years ago,
America dropped the first nuclear bomb on two civilian cities in japan. Hiroshima and nagasaki,
adding up to a sum of over 200,000 civilian casualties(compton). Several questions have arisen about
the development, whether or not dropping the bomb was necessary, why did America decide to bomb
two entire populated cities and what may have happened if America had not dropped the bombs . In
1939, influenced and convinced by other prominent scientist. Albert Einstein who fled germany
because of Nazi persecution, wrote a letter to president Franklin D. Roosevelt to persuade him that
America should build an atomic bomb in response to Nazi Germany attempt to purify uranium atoms
which could be used to create an Atomic bomb(cooper) . Because of Einsteins honorable body of
achievements and reputation, the president listened to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During the height of the world war in the early 1940s japan decided to bomb an American military base
on Hawaii called pearl harbor which was home to thousands of military personnel and several civilians
.That along with the fact that invading the proud country of Japan would result in mass American
casualties(compton) .The president knew japan would not stop if force was not put on Japan and
decided dropping the bombs would be the best chance at speeding up the war . So that being said ,it
sounds like the bombs were dropped to perserve American lives and end the war which in many ways
it did. So dropping the bomb was necessary if you put American soldiers lives above innocent Japanese
civilians . If the war carried on and the bombs were not used ,then its safe to assume thousands of men
and women on each side of the war would have lost their lives and most likely billions of dollars

The Atomic Bomb
In the 1930's and the 1940's there was a change in American leadership. Having this change not only
changed the outcome of the war that we were currently in, but how the rest of the world would view
our country after the war. The decision that Harry Truman was forced to make on the choice to drop the
atomic bomb or to attempt more land invasions was a choice that shaped the outcome of the war. There
were major influences and side effects from the dropping of the atomic bomb and what it did to the
country of Japan. Having the option and the weight of the moral decision weighing on Truman's
shoulders about what decision should be made, he was the only one who was capable of making the
decision that shaped the outcome of the war. Having dropped the bomb on Japan, as a statement of
power and a means to an end in a form was the only way that American lives could have been spared
as comparing that to the lives that would have been lost in a land invasion. Knowing what the issues
with the bomb was; one has to look at the moral issues, the results of the incident, and also how it
played in the rest of the development of the world. The first atomic bomb was dropped on the city of
Hiroshima, one of the larger cities of the country of Japan. The announcement that an atomic bomb had
been dropped on Japan came from Truman as a "scientific landmark and the age of atomic energy" .
This power came as not only for the advancement of civilization, but also the ability for civilization to
be

Atomic Bomb Dbq
There are three main reasons as to why the atomic bomb should have been dropped on Japan. The main
reason behind the atomic bomb being used is that Japan failed to respond to the Potsdam Declaration.
President Truman also knew that the american public wanted the war to end soon. Within his
knowledge was the admittedly high american casualties. To meet the demands of the public and to
minimize further american casualties, president Truman made his decision. The atomic bomb was to be
dropped on Japan. Many american military leaders opposed this decision. Some claimed that when the
Soviets declared war, Japan would undoubtedly surrender, while others feared for the future of
humanity if such a weapon was used. General Dwight Eisenhower was one

Atomic Bomb Pros And Cons
After the surrender of Nazi Germany, America and the Allies wanted to end the World War once and
for all. The United States had become tired and wanted to bring peace around the world. As pressure
increases each day during this time span, the Americans decided to do things differently and drop an
atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, cities of Japan. The Americans secretly created an atomic
bomb to use it on Japan and it was the only time it was used. The atomic bomb was necessary to end
the war or otherwise Japan wouldn't have surrendered that quickly. The U.S. Military had different
views such as whether the bomb should or shouldn't be used. One example includes when The United
States Department of War states to the Japanese people, "Because ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For example, when Albert Einstein introduces Dr. Leo Szilard to Franklin D. Roosevelt in March of
1945. Dr. Szilard concerns the hypothetical importance that nuclear weapons should be used for natural
defense. Dr. Leo Szilard is one of the founders of the neutron emission of uranium (Einstein). Einstein
introduces him to Roosevelt because of the fact that Dr. Szilard can help learn about the atomic bomb
and its pros and cons of using it. Paul Tibbets, pilot of the Enola Gay, didn't regret the fact that he
dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima during an interview. He verbalizes when asked about having
second thoughts about dropping the atomic bomb, "Second thoughts? No. Studs, look. I got into the air
corps to defend the United States to the best of my ability. That's what I believe in and that's what I
work for... knew we did the right thing because when I knew we'd be doing that I thought, yes, we're
going to kill a lot of people, but by God we're going to save a lot of lives. We won't have to invade
[Japan]." Paul Tibbets feels that the decision the United States made was right and should have to
rethink their decision. Also, going back to what Truman said earlier about saving American lives,
Tibbets agrees with this matter. These ethical views show the importance of the atomic

When Was Hiroshima Bombing Wrong
To Drop or To Not Drop
Is it right and just to kill an innocent person? Is it right and just to bomb a crowded city of civilians?
Towards the end of World War 2, President Truman bombed Hiroshima, Japan. Truman killed innocent
men, women, and children without a proper warning. Many Americans wondered if dropping the bomb
was the right way to end the war between the U.S. and Japan. Truman was wrong about dropping the
atomic bomb on Hiroshima because it was too powerful, it went against war rules, and had long term
consequences. In September 1939, Germany invaded Poland, starting the war in Europe. In the same
month, Britain and France declared war on Germany. As aggression grew against Germany, the United
States stayed out of the rising problems in Europe. That changed in July of 1940 when Germany started
bombing Britain. Britain's leader Winston Churchill then asked if the U.S. would aid their country
during the bombing. The U.S. began sending supplies to Great Britain. In December of 1941, Japan
dropped bombs on Pearl Harbor, killing and destroying most of the navy. In May of 1945, Germany
finally surrenders due to the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The United States and Japan both had consequences that lasted a lifetime. Many people that risked
their lives for their countries died. The bomb not only killed, but it spread radiation through the city for
years to come. "The bomb killed an estimated 60,000–100,000 people instantly and tens of thousands
more victims died later from injuries and radiation exposure" (Apgar). Additionally, the U.S. spent a lot
of our funds to help rebuild Japan. We sent over money and supplies to help their country with the after
effects of war. We wasted a lot of money on building the bomb and then clean up its devastation. "And
why argue over numbers when an invasion and the atomic bomb itself might not have been military
necessary?"

World War 2 Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay
World War II Atomic Bombing
World War II was considered as one of the deadliest war in the history. Many innocent civilians died
due to the aggressiveness of the Axis powers because of this actions the Allies wanted to overthrow the
Axis powers in response to its aggression and to establish a peaceful post–war. The United States
decided to join the war along with the Allies after Japan's surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, which
destroyed a lot of United States battleships. President Truman should have dropped the atomic bombs
on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of Japan's bombing attack of United States naval base on Pearl
Harbor which resulted in the United States to declare war on Japan, to end the inhumane actions of the
Japanese soldiers to its ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mrs. Wen, in her testimony of the Japanese atrocities at Nanking in 1937, she writes " Japanese troops
arrived, all of them armed with guns, knives, force me to take off my pants, I would be killed if I didn't,
I personally watched as the Japanese troops massacred many people" (Doc A). In stating this, the
author means that the Japanese soldiers went through every house and shooting every civilian they
could and raping women without hesitation. Mr. Taketa, in his testimony about life in Japan before the
atomic bomb was dropped, he claims that "the Japanese people were forced to endure poverty and
suffering" (Doc D). The author means that Japan's government starve their people to death and let them
suffer, as part of their culture. Furthermore, the Japanese were known by their way of killing their
prisoners. These brutalities by the Japanese soldiers were considered inhumane. Thus, President
Truman should have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan because the cruel actions of the Japanese
needed to be stopped, and save innocent

The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
In August of 1945, two nuclear bombs were dropped on Japan, consequently, killing tens of thousands
of civilians due to radiation, burns, or turning them immediately into ash. The monstrous bomb sneaks
up on innocent civilians and rips their life from them in one foul swoop. The Atomic bomb kills masses
of people at one time, but can also save masses of people's lives from the ongoing war. Herein lies the
conflict, since the nuclear bomb is extremely lethal, but effective, should it be used in war? Do you
believe that this act was ethical? The atomic bomb should have never been used in past wars and
should never be used today because its deadly side effects. Even before the outbreak of War, the United
States was concerned with a fascist regime in Europe researching in nuclear weapons. In retaliation,
the United States began to fund an atomic weapon development program which became known as "The
Manhattan Project" led by J. Robert Oppenheimer. Over the next several years, the Manhattan project
started obtaining key materials such as Uranium–235 and Plutonium and testing prototypes until they
reached a working model (Coroner). With the new working bomb, during World War II American B–29
bomber dropped the world's first atomic bomb called the little boy weighing 9,000 pounds on
Hiroshima, Japan instantly killing eighty–thousand people then killing over tens of thousands of people
after due to radiation exposure. Three days later another bomb called the fat man weighing nearly

How Did Truman Use The Atomic Bomb Dbq

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Alison Reed

More from Alison Reed (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

How Did Truman Use The Atomic Bomb Dbq