4. COMPONENTS
LEADERSHIP GRID
also known as Managerial Grid, is
the best-known leadership style.
The grid contains two famous
leadership matrices that initially
appeared in the 1960s. It was
largely utilized in organizational
training and development, despite
being refined and changed multiple
times.
5. The Leadership Grid was created to
explain how leaders help
organizations achieve their goals
by focusing on two leadership
orientations or dimensions
variables: production and people.
Concern for Production
( / tasks and productivity / results) refers to
how a leader is concerned with achieving
organizational tasks
Concern for People
people refers to how a leader attends to the
people in the organization who are trying to
achieve its goals.
6. FIVE MAJOR
LEADERSHIP
STYLES
01 02 03 04 05
Authority-Compliance
Management
Country-Club
Management
Impoverished
Management
Middle-of-the-Road
Management
Team
Management
(9,1) Autocratic (1, 9) Content
Workforce
(1, 1) Why are they
leading?
(5, 5) Comfortable
but ineffective
(9, 9) The level we all
aspire to !
7. 7
Add title text
Paternalism/Maternalism
Describes a leader who
employs 1,9 and 9,1 leadership
styles but does not combine
them.
“Benevolent Dictator”
Paternalistic/Maternalistic Manner
“Fatherly” or “Motherly”
“Family”
BEHAVIORS
8. Opportunism
a leader who employs any combination of the five
main leadership styles to advance personally. An
opportunistic leader will adapt and modify their
leadership conduct to obtain a personal advantage,
placing self-interest ahead of other considerations.
The Leadership Grid is an example of a practical
leadership model based on two key leadership
behaviors: task and relationship.
10. Support and Challenge Leadership Model Different styles of leadership and its different
environments
1
2
3
4
High challenge + low support = Taskmaster
leading to stress
High Support + low challenge = Counselor
that precedes comfort-zone
Low challenge + low support = Abdicator
causing apathy
High challenge + high support = Coach
resulting in high-performance
12. STAGNATE
too little or no conflict
01
DIVISIVE
or too much conflict
02
PPT下载 http://www.1ppt.com/xiazai/
Relationship between Conflict and
Organization Effectiveness
13. Positive-sum styles Mixed styles
.
Zero-sum styles
Interpersonal Styles of Handling Conflict
Integrating = communication +
examination –(problem-solving)→
acceptance
Obliging = commonalities -
differences
Dominating = winner’s mindset -
ignorance to others
Avoiding = failed to satisfy self and
others → withdraw/buck-
passing/sidestep
Compromising = both give up
something → mutually
acceptable decision
CONCERN FOR
SELF
CONCERN FOR
OTHERS
14. cooperation (attempting to
satisfy the other person’s
concerns) and assertiveness
(attempting to satisfy one’s
own concerns)
= assertive + uncooperative
= assertive + cooperative = intermediate in both cooperativeness and
assertiveness
= unassertive + uncooperative
= unassertive + cooperative
Conflict MODE Instrument
15. Thank You !
C E 4 2 6 1
GROUP NO. 1
3546
PEÑAFLOR, ALDRICH | RAMOS, JEBRIL | BULAY, KRISTINE | OLLAGON ALLYSSA