I meet with a lot of social software companies, ranging from startups that have yet to go public to the established large vendors. This presentation highlights three of the areas that I would like to see all of the vendors doing a better job on: 1) Activity Streams, 2) focus on the individual 3) Analytics.
These slides were presented at Defrag 2012 in Denver, CO on Nov 15, 2012 www.defragcon.com
The image is being used via Creative Commons: http://www.flickr.com/photos/76266195@N08/6976092486/
The image is being used via Creative Commons: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31246066@N04/4377035185
http://www.flickr.com/photos/navonod/1729937274/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/b-tal/482294488/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/navonod/1729937274/
The image is being used via Creative Commons: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mybloodyself/222578140/Universal inbox? !!!!!!!!!!!!I can’t keep up with my own inbox, do you really think I want to read everyone's?Email provides sorting, flagging, colour coding, foldering, etc. Stream are no where near as advanced.
While I'm not worried about total protonic reversal, I am concerned that having status updates, file sharing, Q&A, news links, CRM updates, social media feeds, workflow approvals, ERP orders, support tickets, polls/surveys and a dozen other sources of information all piped into the same stream can make social software almost unusable.
The image is being used via Creative Commons: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dinnerseries/6032052545
Allow users to control the content in the stream by voting for things (posts, people, topics) they like.Does not need to be complex like mail rules.Take a look at Zyte
http://www.flickr.com/photos/badboy69/2333409688/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/auntiep/17135231/
Imagine this for work.Your postsYour file uploadsYour wiki pagesYour blog entriesYour meetings