The Threat Of The War Against Terrorism

The Threat Of The War Against Terrorism
As the world evolves new threats appear and some stand by what they believe in. These beliefs cause harm to other people. An example this would
be, big military forces trying to prove a point by killing innocent civilian lives. This is where the Counter Terrorism forces comes into play. Such as the
United States Seal team six, United kingdom S.A.S and Kopassus – Gultor 81. They seek out those who do wrong and bring them to justice. The only
problem is that they need to have a stronger force to be able to do their job more effectively and perform well in urban areas. By having a larger force,
Many countries can work together in helping the innocent lives of people by getting information of these terror acts. Most recently in Brussel...show
more content...
This would help to find terrorists and prevent any atrocities from happening and it'll most definitely lead to the people who planned any attacks. This is
why countries should put aside their problems and work together to fight terrorism to many innocent lives are being lost. The biggest problem America
faces is terrorism. Polls from December 2–6 2015 show that terrorism was 16% of Americans biggest concerns (Cook). This goes to show that
terrorism is a problem not only for the American people but the entire world. Countries can start by improving their homeland security. After the
United states was attacked on September 11, they did major adjustments to Homeland Security, such as improving screening for passenger bags at
airports. Advanced passenger information and name record data to be able to find high value targets if they ever try board on any plane. Many things
the United States have improved on the European countries should improve on too, especially with many terrorists making fake passports and using
those to pass any airport. Also with German Chancellor Angela Merkel allowing refugees to come to Europe, it should be a necessity to have strict
policies on passports. With Germany being the dominant country bringing refugees, mostly from Syria. That is why most countries who accept
refugees should enforce their passports policy and give the refugees special identification, this should increase the security and address any issues
countries
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

War On Terror Essay
The goal of the War on Terror defined by President Bush is "Our war on terror begins with Al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until
every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated". The problem with this goal is that it is unrealistic and that the definition
of a terrorist varies with in countries. For example those who are labeled freedom fighters in one nation can be considered terrorists in another. People
argue that there is no real enemy and that those who do a terrorist act should be handled through the Judicial System and not by the military. An
example of this is the Boston bombings. Another problem with the War on Terror is that it has added about $1.7 trillion to $18 trillion onto theUnited
States debt. It has also taken jobs away from the American people due to the fact that for every $1 billion given as a tax cut supplies a demand to
create 10,779 jobs when $1 billion spent on defense creates 8,555 jobs. Meaning that for every billion we spend of defense takes away 2,224 jobs.
Another thing is that due to the war in Iraq and Afghanistan people argue that President's Bush's true goal was to "strengthen the U.S. grip on the
Middle East, turn Iraq into a military and political platform for further aggression, gain tighter control of international energy supplies, control and
reshape the entire arc from North Africa to Central Asia, and strengthen the U.S. hand against rivals–current and...show more content...
It protects the United States citizens because after 9/11 the United States has gotten more serious with defense. For example restrictions on what you
can bring on a plane and then going through a metal detector before entering boarding area. Another pro is that by interfering in Afghanistan and Iraq
on can argue that the United States did bring some balance into the lives of the people living

war and terrorism
P3: Outline the terrorism methods used by key terrorist organisations
Terrorism is an act that threatens or carries out violence with the intention to disrupt, kill or coerce against a body or nation in order to impose will.
This means that a lot of groups use this method to get what they want. The groups use a variety of methods, groups such as:
Al Qaeda, who mainly use suicide bombing methods, this is good, because it means there are lots of deaths. This leads to scare and forcing the
Government to negotiate.
Another group, the IRA, the Irish Republican Army use assassinations and guerilla warfare tactics to cause terrorism.
The ETA, Euskadi Ta Askatasuna use bombing tactics. Destroying key economic targets in Spain, such
...show more content...
For example, if there is a chemical spillage, the Fire Service will tackle the incident, and then be able to de–brief and work on a strategy for any similar
future incident.
However, with war and terrorism it is more likely the personnel of Armed Forces have more chance of losing their lives. This is because they are on
the front line and have a higher chance of obtaining an injury. This is going to affect the personnel's families as they may have to do deal with the
tragedy.
Another positive that comes from war, conflict and terrorism, is the media coverage. Media means that there is a lot more publicity and so the services
will get more support and money, allowing them to get more equipment and training. On the other hand, if an incident is dealt with poorly, then the
media will report this, meaning the public will see, this is not good.
This may change the public's perception on the Armed Forces may change because if the public see a bad story that goes against them then the public
will not have as much trust in the Armed Forces.
Terrorism can create tension between countries. With this, wars can be started, and this affects the UK Armed Forces. This is because the army will

then have to defend and fight the enemy who started the

War On Terror Policy Analysis
In order to understand the policies adopted in the War on Terror, we must first look to the origins of the conflict as well as the practices involved.
Whilst the term itself was initially introduced during the Reagan administration, it was given renewed vigour under George Bush following the attacks
on the World Trade Centre in New York and the Pentagon on 9/11. The consequences of these attacks saw the Bush administration undertake a new
policy against terrorism which included: defeating terrorists and abolishing their organisations, denying sponsorship and support to terrorists and
defending US citizen's interests at home and abroad (Whitehouse Archives, 2003). In this way, the War on Terror can be considered more than just an
armed conflict

Essay The War on Terrorism
The war on terrorisms
The war on terrorisms has had many lost souls, this war has been the most expensive war is history and not a lot of countries are in favor of it.
Because of the terror attacks on September 11, the president of the United States George W Bush and his government has spent hundreds of billions of
dollars trying to protect their county and finding terrorist on other countries. (Picture 1)
Terrorism is the affected, use of violence to bring forth fear . Terrorists know what they are doing and their targets are planned in advance. Terrorism
may be motivated by political, religious, or ideological ideas. The base of terrorism is to produce fear in someone to make a government change its
...show more content...
The many environmental impacts include, the preparation for war, including training grounds, camps, barracks, weapons testing etc. the immediate
impacts of terrorism, are usually sudden, and can be either direct or indirect. Direct impacts include bomb and blast damage to settlements, rural areas
and communication networks. Defoliation and ecosystem destruction, the dumping of the machinery of war and the destruction of resources such as
oil fields also occur. Indirect impacts are many and varied and are often longer lasting than the direct impacts. They include the construction of various
camps such as refugee camps, and the distortion of population composition as young males join the conflict; in countries where agriculture is a major
activity this may result in land abandonment and degradation may ensue. Other indirect impacts include loss of wildlife as animals are hunted for bush
meat. Particularly long–lasting effects include the use of land for war graves and other things. Also if terrorists get a hold of a plane what is used for
agriculture like spraying herbicides and pesticides they can put chemicals on the planes and omit them over large area in a short period of time which
can kill plants, animals and even people.
Social Issues on the War on Terrorism
In a society that is every changing many people have different thoughts about the war on terror, the days after 911, the Council on American–Islamic
Relations says it

Terrorism Essay
Terrorism is the unlawful use of force against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population or any segment thereof,
in the furtherance of political or social objectives". This definition includes three elements: (1) Terrorist activities are illegal and involve the use
of force. (2) The actions are intended to intimidate or coerce. (3) The actions are committed in support of political or social objectives.
The main topic here is Terrorism and Foreign Policy. The two terms that are going to be discussed is how the waragainst terrorism is expanding and
how American President George W. Bush misnamed his National Security Strategy.
In his State of the Union address, President Bush threatened to expand...show more content...
Furthermore, if the president attacks North Korea, Iran, or Iraq, he could exacerbate the proliferation problem rather than reduce it. Other nations
would believe that they could be next and think that working on missiles and weapons of mass destruction was the only way to keep out a superpower
bent on intervening in civil wars everywhere in the name of fighting terrorism.
And would the United States really intervene unilaterally in friendly nations that it believed were too timid in fighting terrorism–for example, the
Philippines or Yemen? In the Philippines, would the United States intervene against the wishes of a democracy that it helped institute?
A perpetual state of war–as the president seems to envision when he asserted that the war may run beyond the duration of his term–could undermine
economic recovery, does not comport with the values of a republic, and will likely lead to the erosion of constitutional liberties and the accumulation
of too much power in the executive branch. And a war in perpetuity is not needed to minimize the threat from North Korea, Iran and Iraq. If the United
States could contain the threat from a rival superpower during the Cold War, it can certainly contain three small, poor countries. In addition, a
seemingly unprovoked war against another Moslem nation, Iran, Iraq or both could act as a recruiting poster for

Essay on The war against terrorism
Is war the right way?
Why do people resort to such violent acts as bombing, assassinations, and hi–jacking? How do individuals and organizations justify these acts of terror?
These acts can be described as terrorist actions. Terrorism is a growing international problem. During the last twenty years, new terrorist groups have
sprung up all over the world. Governments have had little success in their attempts to resolve issues in which terrorism is used.
A major problem in discussing terrorism is establishing a generally accepted definition. Terrorism can be described as the unlawful use of fear or
force to achieve certain political, economical, or social aims. Because it is so hard to define, organizations like the United Nations have had...show more
content...
In some cases it may be right but to fight terrorists with war is the wrong way. It is only showing that our country is worse than they are. By
committing war we are only embracing the thought that fighting and killing is the only way to go. This war that we are creating against these
people and their actions is not justified in any manner. We are only creating more of a war in our own country than we are in the country of the one
we are trying to fight. We have created such a war that people can even go places they normally go without being check by an officer or being
suspected by someone that u are a terrorist. As we further bomb and shoot at these terrorists we they will further come back as if they have lost nothing.
We see these terrorists in the news every day and we see that they are not even moved by the actions we are doing to them. They just brush it off as if
it where nothing and had nothing to lose. In this case they don't lose anything but there husbands or wives or maybe their children, they can't lose a
home because most of them don't have homes and if they do they are very dirty and small.
One's gut reaction to any kind of attack is to get revenge, but much like a tango, it takes two to wage war. And frankly, we Americans should stand
our ground! Show everyone that terrorism will not be tolerated! ... and show it peacefully. Once someone drops a nuclear bomb in this day and age,
the world, as we know it, will come to an

War On Terrorism Pros And Cons
"Our war on terror begins with Al– Qaida, but it does not end there, It will not end end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found,
stopped, and defeated." – President George W. Bush after 9/11. After the attack on the twin towers the Bush Administration and some of the United
States' allies formed an organization that fought against terrorism, known as the war on terror. The idea of the war on terror, that one day terrorism
would be eliminated entirely, is a great idea but we, as a nation, should have went about it differently. The war on terror has a negative influence on
the world as demonstrated by the increase in racial profiling, unethical use of torture, and the decrease of privacy. Racial profiling has made the war

The War Against Terrorism Essay
The War Against Terrorism
On August 2nd 1990, Iraq invaded the small oil rich country of Kuwait on its southeastern border. Iraq claimed that Kuwait was a long time province
from the 1800's and early 1900s', whose lands belonged under control of Iraq, a so–called province. Saddam Hussein also argued that Kuwait was
pumping oil from an oil field that was on the border of the two countries and belonged to Iraq. Upon gaining control of Kuwait, Hussein was able to
eliminate his previous debt to Kuwait and gain it's substantial oil wealth, roughly 10% of the worlds oil supply. Regardless of the motives behind Iraq's
invasion, under international law, none of Iraq's claims against Kuwait justified its invasion of that country.
The...show more content...
In the aftermath of the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11th, the world has had a sobering look at worldterrorism. Led mainly by the
United States, and supported by the United Nations, a new war on terrorism has begun. Overwhelming support worldwide has surfaced as President
Bush has vowed to punish those who decide to commit terrorist acts, as well as those who harbor or condone these activities. So far Bush has
followed through on his promise with the war in Afghanistan against the Taliban regime. Others are also displaying their understanding of the situation
and are treading a great deal lighter in search of their causes to avoid being labeled as terrorists, as shown by the latest disarmament and return to the
negotiating table by the Irish Republican Army. As the world watches, President Bush is now faced with enormous pressure to gain control of the
Arab–Israeli conflict.
However, this situation is a difficult one. With Israeli's continual attempt to occupy more land in the disputed settlements, Palestinian anger only grows.
With Yasir Arafat's inability to control, or unwillingness to control, such militant groups as Hamas and Islamic Jihad, chances of the two sides reaching
a piece agreement dwindle.

Exploratory Essay: The War On Terrorism
Carlos M. Fernandez
2/27/2015
P#3
Exploratory Essay
The War on Terror is one of the most discussed topics in politics today, however not enough citizens seem to realize how closely it is affecting their
daily lives. As witnessed by many living in the developed world, including me, airplane travel can be very drawn out and stressful. This can be seen as
a direct effect of the War on Terror, which began in September of 2001 with the U.S invasion of Afghanistan. Since then the U.S. has gotten involved in
more than ten nations in the Middle East resulting in two million deaths, and an estimated $1.2 to $2.7 trillion dollars spent. Even spying on citizens
has become acceptable by the government's standards. But despite all the measures that are being taken to protect America...show more content...
There have been numerous questionings and tortured suspects, and even more detained in GTMO, yet not many convicts. For this research project, I
asked myself the question, Is the War on Terror working? I believe this question should concern Americans becauseterrorism is a looming threat that is
being face by millions around the world, and, thus, we need to find an effective solution to fight against it while minimizing the costs.
To begin my research, I decided to first learn who were the real victims of the War on Terror, and what the U.S. could do to help them. I started by
reading an online news article, "We Are Losing the War on Terror," written by CEO and editor of Foreign Policy, David Rothkopf. He argues that,
while fewer Americans are being killed by terrorists, this war is only creating incentives for, and fueling the spread of terrorism in the Middle East. I
learned that in 2007 there were 28 al–Qaeda–like, jihadist groups; as of 2013 that number has increased to 49, and the

Essay on The War on Terror
War on terror refers to the ongoing military campaign led by U.S and U.K against organizations identified as terrorists. Terrorism can be defined as
an unlawful violence or war deliberately targeted to civilians. It can also be defined as a systematic use of terror to coerce or violent acts intended to
create fear. This threat is normally perpetrated for religious, political or ideological goals. The conflict as also called by other names. They include
World War III, The Long War,War on Terrorism, Bush's War on Terror, The Global War of Terror and War on
Al–Qaeda, (Coaty, 2010).
Terrorism became popular in 1996 when Al– Qaeda network was formed by the late Osama Bin Laden. The network was formed by the World Islamic
Front for Jihad...show more content...
Underlying conditions that terrorists seek to exploit were reduced. This was a measure that was used to reduce the chances of unlawful attacks on the
globe. U.S partnered with the international community to empower weak states and prevent emergence of terrorism. To date, this can be seen in Libya,
Cote Devore and Somalia where the states have no proper governments. The international troops have been deployed in the above states to ensure that
terrorists do not utilize such loopholes to attack the citizens.
Fighting the War on Terror
War on terror is a global challenge. A number of ways have been put across to fight the problem led by theUnited States of America. Defeating terrorist
has been found to be a very effective way of fighting this threat. It is achieved by identity, location and destruction of the terrorists along with their
organizations. Once the unlawful activities are spotted, they are confirmed and relevant actions taken against them instantly. Evidence is the U.S
bombing of Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan in pursuit of Al– Qaeda network which was successful because Osama was later found and killed.
Strategy of targeted killings is also a major way to fight terror. This is a method that focuses on the individuals who bear the greatest responsibility.
The aim is to catch them alive or dead. It has indeed borne fruit over the years. Evidence is the demise of Sadaam, Fazul and the recent killing of Osama

Fighting the War on Terrorism Essay
It has been said that the easiest way to discredit someone in the political field is to accuse them of possessing "Machiavellian morals." Until recently,
today's political arena has been consumed by such illusive and controversial topics as human rights and the environment. Thus, it is easy to see why
being referred to as a disciple of the austere Machiavellian principle could result in the untimely death of a political career. However, as of September
11th, the times have changed and so should the mindset with which politicians approach such elusive topics.
This tragedy was not, however, suffered in vain. Underneath this enveloping shroud of sadness, there were a few blessings in disguise. Outwardly, the
nation acquired a...show more content...
The logical, scientific, methodology behind his theories allows for concise, clear–cut approaches in management of state affairs. His infamous book on
statecraft entitled, "The Prince", is the embodiment of Machiavellianism. This philosophy is centered on two main tenets. Primarily, that political
order is equivocal but entirely separate from any other known 'good' including morality. "Politics has and should have it own rules and should not
accept of any kind from any source where the object is not to win or to prevail" (Machiavelli,vii). In other words, "It must find its inner laws, and free
itself from methodological dependence on theology, metaphysics, and moral philosophy" (Parel, 5). All extemporaneous theories and ideals not
associated specifically with the perfection of political application must be removed from the equation. The state must play 'God' in order to secure the
desired outcome.
Secondly, Machiavelli asserts that "One successfully governs by force and not by law" (Machiavelli). This is not to say that prudency should not also
be simultaneously practiced. However, given the anarchical nature of the international system, conventions and resolutions do not carry much, if any,
weight. Without an authority to enforce such legislation, it is ultimately up to individual states to redress the injustices committed against them. Thus,
it is ultimately the responsibility of United States to avenge the inconceivable attacks of

War on Terrorism Essay
The War On Terrorism
Every morning, millions of people around the world begin their day by reading the newspaper. News topics are constantly discussed in everyday life
and remain the dominant topic of conversation between friends, family, and even strangers. It is our responsibility as a modern society to recognize
all events that impact our lives and make others aware of them, and newspapers as well as the general media allow us this opportunity. The New York
Times, a worldwide newspaper, offers us a chance to become informed of worldwide current events while also offering insight into the development
of society as seen through the eyes of the media. Through developing an archive of New York Times articles over a period of several
...show more
content...
Considering this, I have chosen articles for this chapter that seem most pertinent in the general overview of the response to these attacks, and through
reviewing them one can clearly see the escalation of the American public's grief and desire for revenge and closure.
The development of man's intellectual ability and understanding of the world around him can be most readily seen in the continued development of
science and technology. Whether it be new advancements in medicine and healthcare or improvements on missiles for the anti–terrorism war, science
and technology breakthroughs reassure us that our culture is thriving and continuing to expand our horizons.
As an economic giant in the worldwide scheme of business, the United States has a great focus on economical development and relations with
foreign countries. The stock market has drastically changed in response to the terrorist attacks, and this in turn has led to a great impact on the lives
of billions. The World Trade Towers, a symbol of our economic prowess, have fallen, but the American desire to move forward in the field of world
business has compelled me to include this aspect of life in my archive.
Although economics fuels our society from a business standpoint, the development of the mind is a practice that can never be rivaled. Through arts and
entertainment, man is able to find what he is most

Essay On War On Terror
Introduction. The United States' War on Terror is a mistake because it is bringing more burdens and terrorism to the United States at home and
abroad. While the October 11, 2001, U.S. invasion of Afghanistan is considered to be rightfully justified by 9/11, there is evidence to show that the
January 17, 1991 Operation Desert Storm, which started the issues in the Middle East, was merely justified by the fear of a monopoly on the world's
oil by the ruthless dictator Saddam Hussein. This event is essential to understanding the current War on Terror, given that it is the beginning of the US
involvement in the Middle East. Therefore, understanding what occurred in 1990, is necessary to understanding the reasons behind the current War on
Terror. On August 1, 1990, the Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, ordered an attack on Iraq's neighbor Kuwait, who had been a part of Iraq until 1961.
Hussein stated that he was simply reuniting what should have never been divided. April Glaspie, U.S....show more content...
This was another violation of the laws of war. This report shows how the CIA and theUnited States clearly failed to uphold the laws of war that are
supposed to be upheld with the signing of the Geneva Convention. Because the United States signed the Geneva Convention, the ones responsible for
the war crimes should have been tried at the International Criminal Court ("Punishment). But rather than those in the CIA that were responsible for
these heinous acts being tried and convicted, no one was ever punished for these horrible acts. One could argue that they were just using these methods
to get an upper hand on the terrorists that they were fighting that would have done the same thing to U.S. soldiers in a heartbeat, but by the United
States doing these things to the terrorists that they capture, makes them just as bad as the terrorists that they are

The War On Terror Summary
The beginning of "The War on Terror". "The appeal of justice and liberty in the end, is greater than the appeal of hatred and tyranny in any
form."(Bush).Bush's comment was referring to "The War on Terror" because he was in presidency during this year so this quote said by him means
that he wants freedom for everyone.The solution to the "U.S.'s War on Terror" is ITA researchers, Antiterrorism Assistance Program, The Institute for
the Study of War and The Critical Threats Project. The Antiterrorism Assistance Program is helping out by assisting in different assignments such as
protecting us. The ways it's protecting us is by having us alerted to every threat, incident, and action a terrorist plans, and or has done. It has helped
about 84,000

Wars and terrorist attacks are both catastrophic events that occur all around the world. War and terrorism both have some aspects that make them
unique. They also share some similarities such as destruction and fear. Chris Hedges War is a Force That Gives us Meaning, the movie Why we Fight,
and the RAND Corporation's Terrorism Past and Present show some of these similarities and differences.
One of the biggest differences between war and terrorism is the way the government and society wants Americans to feel about each. Why we Fight
makes the point that the government wants Americans to support war. By supporting war, citizens are allowing for more jobs and government profit.
In general, the United States considers war to be good, even if the reasoning behind the war is unknown. Hedges mentions how war gives
Americans a sense of empowerment and hope. War can be one's key to success in life. He also discusses how these concepts exist due to the way the
media sugar coats the realities of war. The Government and the society want citizens to have the opposite feelings about terrorism. Americans are told
to believe war is good and terrorism is evil. In Terrorism Past and Present, Bruce Hoffman, a knowledgeable person on the subject of...show more
content...
Soldiers go to war knowing that they may never return home, but also know they are giving the ultimate sacrifice to their country. Some wars such
as World War II have also used suicide bombing. There is also a kind of terrorism called suicide terrorism. In both suicide bombing and suicide
terrorism, the victim is willing to voluntarily kill himself for what he believes is the ultimate good. Suicide bombing is however planned out by
many war officials prior to the attack. Suicide terrorism is usually carried out by a single person, also known as a "lone wolf"

The Battle Against The War On Terrorism
What Now? An analysis of the responses to the Senate Report on CIA Interrogation
The fight against the "war on terrorism" has initiated a debate in the United States over the use of torture and advanced interrogation techniques to
extract information needed to protect the safety of its citizens. In lieu of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, government officials believed that using extensive
force against suspected is justified, especially if such force results in the prevention of future planned attacks. Others reject torture and the methods
used by the government agencies, especially the CIA, as both "unreliable and an affront to legal and civilized norms of behavior." In December of
2014, The Senate Intelligence Committee Report on CIA torture, drafted by the bipartisan United States Select Committee on Intelligence, brought light
to the controversy by unearthing the methods and techniques used to interrogate detainees, prisoners of war, and suspected terrorists. The findings
have ignited strong opposition and outcry among the citizens, critics of the government, and foreign nations. The aftermath of this report have
prompted two important questions: Should the CIA be held responsible for its actions and face investigations, prosecution, and full legal action or
should the CIA have the ability to act and determine policies they seem fit to protect the U.S. from any threats and outside forces?
Torture is defined by the United Nations Convention Against Torture as "any act by

Argumentative Essay On War On Terrorism
AMERICAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITY
HOW EFFECTIVE IS U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY IN COUNTERING TERRORISM
VICTOR RAY HOLLIFIELD
TERRORISM AND COUNTERTERRORISM INTL450
10 DECEMBER 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The United States of America has for centuries been confronted with many situations of terror. However, these situations
had never before the 2001 September attack made Americans feel anxious about their safety. Most times that American security was threatened, the war
was conventional, and the country's military was always prepared for the attacks. However, the 2001 September terrorist attack awakened America to
an age of unconventional terror and heightened anxiety. The aftermath of the attack forced the USA to change its view and tactics of dealing with
terrorism drastically. Having identified the need to deal with terrorism from its roots, president's Bush administration declared war on terror with the
aim of bringing Al–Qaeda and Osama bin Laden to justice and to stop further attacks and existence of other terrorist groups. According to Urgoji
(2017), the first tactic that the government used was to place economic and military sanctions on states that were perceived to harbor or fund
terrorism.[footnoteRef:1] The other tactic the USA employed was increasing global surveillance and intelligence sharing among its allied states. The
third policy initiated involved the USA invasion of Iraq targeting Al–Qaeda and Taliban camps. Some of the domestic policies

George Bush and His War Against Terrorism Essay
George Bush and His War Against Terrorism
When George W Bush came to the presidential office of America at the beginning of the year 2000, there was already a lot of controversy that
surrounded him. He was appointed Governor of Texas in 1995 and as of 7:30pm, December 7, 2000, 152 people have been executed during Bush's
office as governor. This makes Texas Governor George W Bush the most
–killing Governor, in the history of the United States of America. This list can
be found on the website http://www.bushkills.com/murders.html. Even his run for presidency was controversial: it is still not certain if Bush actually
won; many believe that it was his opponent Al Gore. Following the tragic events...show more content...
So we now have an accusation that cannot be backed up, yet Bush still decides to launch an attack on Afghanistan. The attack is widely regarded as a
failure though Bush will not admit it. In Afghanistan the US army used a policy of 'blanket bombing', which was basically: bomb everything in sight,
and you're bound to hit something. This 'something' was 1 nursing home, 2 Red Cross hospitals, 1 school and hundreds of homes. They did manage,
with the help of the anti–Taliban group in Afghanistan, the Northern Alliance, to find some arms caches and 'eliminate' some Taliban members. Once
people realized that the operation in Afghanistan was a failure, Bush tried to regain his popularity by announcing yet another controversial move; plans
to attack Iraq. During the 1990's Saddam Hussein, the leader of Iraq invaded Kuwait, the worlds biggest oil producer, and the US and UN stepped
in to defend it. This was known as the gulf war and was a big success for the US, although they did not manage to get rid of Hussein. Many people
now believe that Bush is now trying to pick up where his predecessor, Bill Clinton, left off and rid the world of Saddam Hussein and his oppression
forever. This is all fine and well, but they are completely unprovoked and have absolutely no reason to attack: Iraq has kept themselves to themselves
since the end of the gulf war. An assault on Iraq would, as the assault on

The Threat Of The War Against Terrorism

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

The Threat Of The War Against Terrorism