This document is a civilian evaluation report for Wayne Smith, who works as a Quality Assurance Specialist for the Office of the Program Manager, Saudi Arabia National Guard (OPM-SANG). The report covers the period from 2011 to 2012. It details Mr. Smith's duties, which include developing and maintaining quality assurance programs. It provides positive comments on Mr. Smith's work developing training and standard operating procedures. The rater and senior rater both rate Mr. Smith's overall performance as "successful."

1. SENIOR SYSTEM CIVILIAN EVALUATION REPORT
For use of this form, see AR 690-400; the proponent agency is ASA(M&RA).
PART I - ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
a. NAME (Last, First. Middle Initial) b. POSITION TITLE, PAY PLAN, SERIES AND GRADE
Smith, Wayne Quality Assurance Specialist, GS-1910/ 12
c. ORGANIZATION/INSTALLATION IOffice of the Program Manager, Saudi Arabia National Guard (OPM-SANG)
d. REASON FOR SUBMISSION
QI ANNUAL D SPECIAL D INTERN
e. PERIOD COVERED (YYYYMMDD)
FROM 20 111101 THRU 2012 1031
If. RATED MOS. I g. RATEE COPY (Check one and date)
12 ~GIVEN TO RATEE D FORWARDED TO RATEE
PART II -AUTHENTICATION
a. NAME OF RATER (Last. First. Middle Initial) SIGNATURE
WESTON.J.ANA.LYNN.1231&713~
DATE (YYYYMMDD)
Weston, Jana 20 121124
GRADE/RANK, ORGANIZATION, DUTY ASSIGNMENT
GS-1102/15, OPM-SANG, Saudi Arabia
b. NAME OF INTERMEDIATE RATER (Optional)(Lasi. Flfst, MIJ SIGNATURE DATE (YYYYMMDD)
GRADE/RANK, ORGANIZATION, DUTY ASSIGNMENT
c. NAME OF SENIOR RATER !Last First. Middle lnitial)(lfusedJ SIGNATURE
BAII..EY.THOMAS.MICllABL.10984053~
DATE (YYYYMMDD)
Bailey, Thomas M 20 1211 24
GRADE/RANK, ORGANIZATION, DUTY ASSIGNMENT
GS-15, OPM-SAN G , Unit 61304, APO A E 09803, ChiefofStaff,
d. RATEE: I understand my signature does not constitute SIGNATURE OF RATEE DATE (YYYYMMDD)
agreement or disagreement with the evaluations of the
ISMl'IllWAYNE.NORBER.T.1216621~Rater and Senior Rater, and merely verifies Part I and Part 20 1211 25
IV data.
PART Ill - PERFORMANCE AWARD/QUALITY STEP INCREASE
a. RECOMMENDATIONS b. ST, SL, GM, GS, WS - PERFORMANCE AWARD/OSI
SES - AWARD. BONUS/
PERFORMANCE PERCENT OF SALARY ( INCLUDES Locality Pay) % (OR)
RATING SALARY
SALARY INCREASE AWARD-BONUS AMOUNT s (OR)
(1) (2) (3) OSI (GS with Successful Level 1 Rating Only - minimum of 52 weeks
RECOMMENDING OFFICIALS
must have elapsed since last QSI)
YES NO YES NO TO (Grade/Step):
RATER '"l I I AWARD APPROVED BY
INTERMEDIATE RATER I I I I
PERFORMANCE REVIEW BOARD I I D DATE (YYYYMMDD) IFUND CITE
SENIOR RATER ES s
PART IV - DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)
DAILY DUTIES ANO SCOPE (To include as appropriate: poople, equipment. facilities. and dollars) . Position Description (DA Form 374) is correct: 6lJ YES LJ NO
Serves as a Senior Q uality Assurance Specialist providing direction and guidance during development, procurement, production,
conversion and overhaul phases to assure the accomplishment of the QA programs for the assigned system(s). Serves as the technical
expert and consultant on QA matters and provides technical staff guidance in carrying out the overall quality assurance program.
procurements. Manages coordination between manufacturing facilities, contractors, commodity command quality organizations and
directs quality aspects coverage at the contractor facilities.
PART V - VALUES (Rater)
VALUES BULLET COMMENTS
Loyalty
Duty - Possesses abundance of enthusiasm, and exuberance to get the job done
Respect - Highly commited to achieving organization success
s elness service
- Consistentl y displays a commitment to core values
- Perceptive and hard working
Honor - Always willing to assist anyone within the organization
Integrity - Accepts taskings above and beyond whenever called on
Personal courage
DA FORM 7222, MAR 2010 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. APO PE vl.OOES

2. PERIOD COVERED (YYYYMMDD)
20111101 thru 20121031 I
RATEE'S NAME
Smith, Wayne
PART VI - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Rater)
a. PERFORMANCE DURING THIS RATING PERIOD
Comparison of individual objectives against accomplishments and DA-established performance standards resulted in the following objectives ratings:
~ Excellence
75% or More Obj D Excellence
25-74% Obj
Includes Excellence in Org MgVLdshp OR EEO/AA
Obj for supv/mgr 0 Yes D No
b. BULLET EXAMPLES
D Success All or
Excellence
0 Needs Improvement
1 or More Obj D
Fails 1 or More
Obj
- During this rating period Mr Smith accepted responsibility for developing and maintaining a viable contracting officer representative's
(COR) program for OPM SANG. Mr Smith independently worked with the Army Contracting Command to attain 100% completion of
records loaded into the mandatory COR reporting tool.
- Develped and conducted a comprehensive training program tailored for the unique OPM SANG environment for
- Developed a Standard Operating Procedure for use by OPM SANG CORs that fully addressed the organziation's responsibility for
monitoring contractor performance.
- Assisted numerous customers and contracting officer's with developing quality assurance surveillance plans that were effective in
monitoring high profile contractor performance
- Developed Quality Assurance program/process for applicable contracts.
- Performed Quality Assurance inspections on contractor performance and contract files that resulted in documentation required by
Federal Acquisition regulations.
- Worked with OPM SANG contracting officers to develop QASP strategies that conformed to unique SANG environment and were
prepared within time limits necessary to support timely contract awards.
BULLET COMMENTS
PART VIII - SENIOR RATER (if used) or
RATER (no senior rater used)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
x2 } SUCCESSFUL
3
4
5
FAIR
UNSUCCESSFUL
(MUST Have Senior
Rater Review)
REVERSE, DA FORM 7222, MAR 2010
PART VII - INTERMEDIATE RATER (Optional)
PART IX - SENIOR RATER (if used)
BULLET COMMENTS (Performance/Potential)
- Impact performer within the OPM-SANG Procurement Support Branch. His efforts
were paramount to the implementation of a comprehensive Contracting Officer
Representative program.
- Highly motivated and high energy; always works hard to get the mission accomplished.
- Capable of levels of increased responsibility.
A completed DA Form 7222-1 was received with this
report and considered in my evaluation and review:
l2j YES D NO (Explain)
APO PE v1.00ES